|
|
Forums:
Climbing Information:
Injury Treatment and Prevention:
Re: [bspisak] Souders Crack 11d groundfall:
Edit Log
|
|
zeke_sf
May 22, 2007, 2:02 PM
Views: 13614
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
bspisak wrote: How can they possibly track down every single climber that may have a time bomb on their rack?
OK, I just want to say this sentence is why I won't be buying any more Alien cams.
Kudos for doing such a thorough sifting of the rc.com "literature," Brian. However, you lose credibility because after every review of these incidents you add in a rationalization for CCH. Biased much? They're a small company, their secretary SNAFU'd, how can they track down every climber, and CCH doesn't want to fall victim to a hoax (shouldn't they presume every report isn't a hoax before ad-hoc labelling it such? How convenient for them). Maybe by the standards of proof you couldn't send CCH to the electric chair, but they're certainly going to be paying a judgment. Not in your court, however.
Why don't you apply your self-ascribed sense of skepticism to CCH? You've had personal experiences with Alien flaws, yet even that doesn't diminish you assuming the best of CCH and the worst of the "arm-chair mechanical engineers." I guess that makes you an "arm-chair apologist."
(This post was edited by zeke_sf on May 22, 2007, 2:06 PM)
|
|
|
Edit Log:
|
|
Post edited by zeke_sf
() on May 22, 2007, 2:05 PM
|
|
Post edited by zeke_sf
() on May 22, 2007, 2:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
