Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads: Re: [crackers] 40B: Edit Log




dps


Feb 3, 2009, 2:18 AM

Views: 1654

Registered: Jul 24, 2005
Posts: 116

Re: [crackers] 40B
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  

crackers wrote:
btreanor wrote:
As I said in the other thread, the 40B is perfect. Usable for a day cragging or an overnight technical route. The amazing compressibility of Cilogear makes larger size packs usable for smaller tasks. That being said, I pretty much only use my 40B now; the last time it actually opted for the 60L was a 5 day backpacking trip where I was carrying the "guide's load" (extra sh|te, first aid kids, etc., etc.). For all my personal trips, half day to three day two night, it's the 40B.

Thanks for the kind words Brian and all the rest of you!

The 45L is the pack that's shown up in those awesome pictures in the last, oh, seven Patagonia catalogs. That said Mr Retro, you want the 40B if your torso is under 20 inches...

The new 40B and 45 are both quite a bit lighter than the old packs. They're both made here in Portland, Oregon. But the 40B does have a shorter back panel length than the 45L / 60L sized packs as Justin suggested quite correctly.

The guys in those catalogs are using the 45 in Patagonia, in the himalayas and all that jazz. They're using 30L's and 40B's at home for days or even weekends. I suspect that you'll have plenty of room in the 40B for all of your stuff.

I've gotten it down to about 150 emails to respond to from the OR shutdown, and I should be caught up by tomorrow. (I hope.)

I totally agree with what crackers is saying. My 45L has seen the most use on big alpine days and internationally. The pack has been through hell and back and there are only a few things wrong with it. I haven't used my 60L since I got the 45L, I've just been loaning it out to friends (including some attempted new routing in South America).

And now that I have a 30L, I barely take out the 45L for local trips. I've put over 30 days of use on a 30L pack so far this ice season and it is holding up beautifully. If you think you might want to carrying a bit more than the bare essentials, the 40B is the perfect pack in my opinion.

I'm 6'2'' and never have a problem carrying the 45L on an alpine climb as long as I take out the plastic frame sheet. I don't know why you'd be climbing with it, as the pack is so much lighter and comfortable for climbing without it.


(This post was edited by dps on Feb 3, 2009, 2:21 AM)



Edit Log:
Post edited by dps () on Feb 3, 2009, 2:21 AM


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?