Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads: Re: [j_ung] Stretchy terminology: Edit Log




jt512


Jun 3, 2010, 3:05 PM

Views: 4308

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [j_ung] Stretchy terminology
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  

j_ung wrote:
I think we've established over and over again that "absorbs force," is technically incorrect to describe what happens when rope stretches during a fall. So, what exactly is the correct terminology to denote what a dynamic rope does? Is it "dissipate energy?" "Eat force and poop energy?"

The rope stretches, converting the kinetic energy of the falling climber into strain energy in the rope. So, saying that the rope "absorbs" energy (as opposed to force) is not too far off the mark.

The reason that a dynamic rope reduces the impact force on the climber, relative to a static rope (or the ground), is that force F is proportional to acceleration a:

F = ma ,

where m is mass (of the climber).

The stretchier the rope, the smaller will be a; and the smaller a is, the smaller F will be. A dynamic rope is stretchier than a static one; therefore, by the above argument, the impact force will be lower for a dynamic rope than a static one, all else equal.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Jun 3, 2010, 3:43 PM)



Edit Log:
Post edited by jt512 () on Jun 3, 2010, 3:43 PM


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?