Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Trad Climbing:
Most Worthless Piece of Gear
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Trad Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 


Partner devkrev


Oct 1, 2010, 4:28 PM
Post #1 of 225 (19546 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 28, 2004
Posts: 933

Most Worthless Piece of Gear
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey,

There are numerous threads for the "must-have" specialized gear for a given crag, but for fun/discussion: What is the most WORTHLESS piece of gear that you have found to be the case at a crag?

I'll start with a few off the top of my head:

Rumney: Cordelette
Gunks: DMM aluminium offset nuts, hexes

I found myself finding very few nut placements on Chapel Pond Slab in the Dacks. I remember being happy that my fiancee decided to bring extra small cams. I would be tempted to not bring nuts at all, but that would make for some expensive bailing if need be.


roninthorne


Oct 1, 2010, 4:43 PM
Post #2 of 225 (19526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 27, 2002
Posts: 659

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

a gym climbing instructor


full1346


Oct 1, 2010, 5:24 PM
Post #3 of 225 (19476 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2007
Posts: 61

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

a mammut chalk container


Partner camhead


Oct 1, 2010, 5:25 PM
Post #4 of 225 (19476 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [roninthorne] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hexes. ATCs. Cordalettes. PAS's.


Rudmin


Oct 1, 2010, 5:27 PM
Post #5 of 225 (19471 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2009
Posts: 606

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

search function?

http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._reply;so=ASC;mh=25;


gblauer
Moderator

Oct 1, 2010, 5:28 PM
Post #6 of 225 (19468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2002
Posts: 2824

Re: [Rudmin] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

metollius rope hook


Partner devkrev


Oct 1, 2010, 5:32 PM
Post #7 of 225 (19453 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 28, 2004
Posts: 933

Re: [Rudmin] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post


No, I definitely find the search function useful at the cragsTongue

I guess I was looking at specifically, pieces of protection, thats kinda why I put this in the trad forum, I guess I didn't explain myself enough/derailed it from the get go with my Rumney cordelette listing.

I didn't mean all around worthless junk, I guess I meant protection that is useless in some crags, that could really be useful elsewhere.

dev


bill413


Oct 1, 2010, 5:36 PM
Post #8 of 225 (19445 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Big Bro - totally glad I borrowed it on a route on Chapel Pond slabs; Otherwise, not so useful where I climb.


swoopee


Oct 1, 2010, 5:49 PM
Post #9 of 225 (19422 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 560

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

SMC Camlocks. Frown


spikeddem


Oct 1, 2010, 6:14 PM
Post #10 of 225 (19396 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [swoopee] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (9 ratings)  
Can't Post

gold camalots


bill413


Oct 1, 2010, 6:30 PM
Post #11 of 225 (19382 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [swoopee] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

swoopee wrote:
SMC Camlocks. Frown

Oh, yeah.


potreroed


Oct 1, 2010, 6:49 PM
Post #12 of 225 (19357 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 30, 2001
Posts: 1454

Re: [gblauer] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gblauer wrote:
metollius rope hook

Really?? As a Potrero Chico enthusiast I would think you'd appreciate them. You're not one of those who drape the rope over your foot when belaying on multi-pitch, are you?


Gmburns2000


Oct 1, 2010, 7:28 PM
Post #13 of 225 (19315 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

devkrev wrote:
Hey,

There are numerous threads for the "must-have" specialized gear for a given crag, but for fun/discussion: What is the most WORTHLESS piece of gear that you have found to be the case at a crag?

I'll start with a few off the top of my head:

Rumney: Cordelette
Gunks: DMM aluminium offset nuts, hexes

I found myself finding very few nut placements on Chapel Pond Slab in the Dacks. I remember being happy that my fiancee decided to bring extra small cams. I would be tempted to not bring nuts at all, but that would make for some expensive bailing if need be.

I actually have a couple of DMM offset nuts and I find really good placements for them at the 'Gunks fairly often.

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Most worthless piece of gear I've seen specifically on High E in the 'Gunks: Big Bros (seriously, wtf?)


moose_droppings


Oct 1, 2010, 7:35 PM
Post #14 of 225 (19303 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

devkrev wrote:
I didn't mean all around worthless junk, I guess I meant protection that is useless in some crags, that could really be useful elsewhere.

dev

By that criteria, tricams.


ClimbSoHigh


Oct 1, 2010, 7:49 PM
Post #15 of 225 (19274 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 28, 2008
Posts: 208

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Anything metal, true heros jam knots in cracks.

But in reality, as far as pro goes, I would say most worthless is the valley giant, get with the big bros.




malcolm777b


Oct 1, 2010, 7:57 PM
Post #16 of 225 (19263 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 9, 2009
Posts: 204

Re: [ClimbSoHigh] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ClimbSoHigh wrote:
Anything metal, true heros jam knots in cracks.

But in reality, as far as pro goes, I would say most worthless is the valley giant, get with the big bros.

[image]http://home.pacbell.net/takasper/slcd/VGhistory.html[/image]

Are you serious??? VGs are AWESOME for the wide. You can't walk a Big Bro....Big bros are for when you want to leave a piece, but you want to keep walking that valley giant up with you.


bearbreeder


Oct 1, 2010, 8:05 PM
Post #17 of 225 (19253 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960

Re: [moose_droppings] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

tricams r awwwsum ... i place them on every moderate climb in squamish/rockies ...

they work great as a second set of nuts/cams and r much lighter to boot

for alpine you can just bring em instead of cams since they also work in lightly iced cracks

useless??? ... everything is useless till nothing else will fit ... lol


marc801


Oct 1, 2010, 8:19 PM
Post #18 of 225 (19230 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.
Except for where it's critical on routes at Smith, Skaha, NRG, American Fork, Owens River Gorge, and numerous other places where the first bolt on many routes is intentionally placed high to keep you from decking before bolt #2.

You need to travel a bit more before making these sweeping generalizations.


shoo


Oct 1, 2010, 8:35 PM
Post #19 of 225 (19212 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501

Re: [marc801] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Before his devolves into another "I love/hate tricame" thread, let me get it over with and say shut up, you're wrong.


marc801


Oct 1, 2010, 8:39 PM
Post #20 of 225 (19204 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [shoo] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shoo wrote:
Before his devolves into another "I love/hate tricame" thread, let me get it over with and say shut up, you're wrong.
But I didn't say anything about tricams.


moose_droppings


Oct 1, 2010, 8:47 PM
Post #21 of 225 (19196 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [bearbreeder] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I agree and use them all the time.
You wait though, just as in many other threads, a lot of people from different areas will say that they're useless.

So they fit his criteria of
devkrev wrote:
I didn't mean all around worthless junk, I guess I meant protection that is useless in some crags, that could really be useful elsewhere.


Partner camhead


Oct 1, 2010, 9:10 PM
Post #22 of 225 (19172 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.


hafilax


Oct 1, 2010, 9:15 PM
Post #23 of 225 (19164 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [camhead] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.
This is in the trad climbing forum.


Gmburns2000


Oct 1, 2010, 11:07 PM
Post #24 of 225 (19091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [camhead] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?


hafilax


Oct 1, 2010, 11:11 PM
Post #25 of 225 (19087 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?


Gmburns2000


Oct 1, 2010, 11:25 PM
Post #26 of 225 (9849 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [hafilax] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.


hafilax


Oct 1, 2010, 11:55 PM
Post #27 of 225 (9842 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.
Why would you let a question of style keep you from climbing a good route?


johnwesely


Oct 2, 2010, 12:01 AM
Post #28 of 225 (9832 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [swoopee] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

swoopee wrote:
SMC Camlocks. Frown

Yes. Why do you have them?


johnwesely


Oct 2, 2010, 12:01 AM
Post #29 of 225 (9831 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear I've seen specifically on High E in the 'Gunks: Big Bros (seriously, wtf?)

Good times.


Gmburns2000


Oct 2, 2010, 12:10 AM
Post #30 of 225 (9825 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [hafilax] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.
Why would you let a question of style keep you from climbing a good route?

seriously, do I need to answer this, particularly in this thread?

OK, you wanted thread drift, here we go with the forever basic question that gets asked about a dozen times per year: why do you climb?

I climb for me. I don't climb for anyone else, even though I will gladly lend my services to my partner so that (s)he can also climb for him/herself. I try very hard to make climbing satisfying for me, and I get disappointed when I don't succeed in reaching that goal. Using a stick clip is very unsatisfying to me. Therefore, for me, which, as you may note is consistently how everyone else has responded to the question at hand, a stick clip is a worthless piece of gear.

Someone else noted tri-cams. I couldn't disagree more, but I assume, based on my answer above, that they have a reason for saying that, and that's because they climb for themselves, too, and that tri-cams don't factor into their climbing-satisfaction equation, so to speak.


Gmburns2000


Oct 2, 2010, 12:11 AM
Post #31 of 225 (9824 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [johnwesely] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear I've seen specifically on High E in the 'Gunks: Big Bros (seriously, wtf?)

Good times.

she was kinda sexy though.


bill413


Oct 2, 2010, 12:40 AM
Post #32 of 225 (9807 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.

Why not respect the first ascensionists/bolters who designed the route to use a stick?


johnwesely


Oct 2, 2010, 1:41 AM
Post #33 of 225 (9783 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear I've seen specifically on High E in the 'Gunks: Big Bros (seriously, wtf?)

Good times.

she was kinda sexy though.

She was a he Greg.


ensonik


Oct 2, 2010, 3:58 AM
Post #34 of 225 (9752 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 15, 2009
Posts: 134

Re: [johnwesely] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
She was a he Greg.

Awkward.

More to the point : Rap rings at Rumney.


giggly


Oct 2, 2010, 4:49 AM
Post #35 of 225 (9735 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2010
Posts: 64

Re: [ensonik] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

carabiners


sbaclimber


Oct 2, 2010, 4:54 AM
Post #36 of 225 (9733 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [ClimbSoHigh] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ClimbSoHigh wrote:
Anything metal, true heros jam knots in cracks.
I wish.....Frown

Knots are a good pick for this thread though. There are some crags were I can't imagine placing any that would have an even remote chance of holding.


Gmburns2000


Oct 2, 2010, 10:17 AM
Post #37 of 225 (9700 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [johnwesely] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear I've seen specifically on High E in the 'Gunks: Big Bros (seriously, wtf?)

Good times.

she was kinda sexy though.

She was a he Greg.

um, there were three of them, and the one with the big bros hanging off her harness was a she.


Gmburns2000


Oct 2, 2010, 10:17 AM
Post #38 of 225 (9699 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [bill413] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

bill413 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.

Why not respect the first ascensionists/bolters who designed the route to use a stick?

heh.


USnavy


Oct 2, 2010, 11:41 AM
Post #39 of 225 (9684 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667

Re: [gblauer] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gblauer wrote:
metollius rope hook
Those are actually quite useful for half ropes to help stack them IMO. I find stacking half ropes over my lap like I stack a single rope always leads to tangle fucks, the rope hook reduces them quite a bit.


johnwesely


Oct 2, 2010, 12:32 PM
Post #40 of 225 (9668 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear I've seen specifically on High E in the 'Gunks: Big Bros (seriously, wtf?)

Good times.

she was kinda sexy though.

She was a he Greg.

um, there were three of them, and the one with the big bros hanging off her harness was a she.

I am just yanking your chain.


moose_droppings


Oct 2, 2010, 4:51 PM
Post #41 of 225 (9621 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [johnwesely] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear I've seen specifically on High E in the 'Gunks: Big Bros (seriously, wtf?)

Good times.

she was kinda sexy though.

She was a he Greg.

um, there were three of them, and the one with the big bros hanging off her harness was a she.

I am just yanking your chain.

Five foot penalty slack for chain yanking to johnwesely.
Ten foot penalty slack for not getting it to Gmburns2000.

Net loss of 5 foot penalty slack to Gmburns2000


marc801


Oct 2, 2010, 4:52 PM
Post #42 of 225 (9619 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (7 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.
This makes zero sense. It's like saying you wouldn't want to do the Nose because it has a couple of pendulums.


uni_jim


Oct 2, 2010, 5:18 PM
Post #43 of 225 (9608 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 429

Re: [marc801] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

The only route I have ever used a stick clip on was my own.

The thing is, it was not so much a route as a one bolt "stick clip problem." If the landing didn't suck so bad it would have been a cool highball, but it was bad so I sunk one bolt. You stick clip it, climb through the crux moves on TR, and then move above the bolt on 5.9 to top out and walk off.

too short to bolt like a sport climb, and a top rope setup puts the rope over an abrasive edge, so this seemed like the best way to protect the climb.


swoopee


Oct 3, 2010, 2:23 AM
Post #44 of 225 (9538 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 560

Re: [johnwesely] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
swoopee wrote:
SMC Camlocks. Frown

Yes. Why do you have them?

I had a few until recently. I haven't seen them since I moved but they are probably around here somewhere.


johnwesely


Oct 3, 2010, 2:56 AM
Post #45 of 225 (9529 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [swoopee] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

swoopee wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
swoopee wrote:
SMC Camlocks. Frown

Yes. Why do you have them?

I had a few until recently. I haven't seen them since I moved but they are probably around here somewhere.

I have the entire set, including the wired one.


jakedatc


Oct 3, 2010, 2:19 PM
Post #46 of 225 (9472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [hafilax] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.
Why would you let a question of style keep you from climbing a good route?

He has quite a long list of reasons why he won't try hard...ever. among others are too hot, too cold, too scared, too hard, too steep, too crimpy, too slopey,..........


bill413


Oct 3, 2010, 3:25 PM
Post #47 of 225 (9450 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [jakedatc] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.
Why would you let a question of style keep you from climbing a good route?

He has quite a long list of reasons why he won't try hard...ever. among others are too hot, too cold, too scared, too hard, too steep, too crimpy, too slopey,..........

....It's a high gravity day.


milesenoell


Oct 3, 2010, 4:07 PM
Post #48 of 225 (9440 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Have fun at Smith.


Gmburns2000


Oct 4, 2010, 1:06 PM
Post #49 of 225 (9356 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [marc801] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.
This makes zero sense. It's like saying you wouldn't want to do the Nose because it has a couple of pendulums.

uh, yeah, because single pitch sport climbs and classic big walls are the same thing. there are plenty of the prior in this world and not very many of the latter. sometimes in life one takes what one can get. if and when I'm ever ready to take on the Nose, I'll pendulum. single pitch sport climbs? simply not worth it.

there are very, very, very few absolutes in life. activism is a matter of convenience. if anyone says any different then they're full of shit.


Gmburns2000


Oct 4, 2010, 1:09 PM
Post #50 of 225 (9351 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [jakedatc] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.
Why would you let a question of style keep you from climbing a good route?

He has quite a long list of reasons why he won't try hard...ever. among others are too hot, too cold, too scared, too hard, too steep, too crimpy, too slopey,..........

yeah, yeah Jake you climb hard. we know how hard you climb. you climb FUCKING HARD. but knowing how hard of a climber you are, how big your sack is, and how little I am compared to you, I still won't stick clip because I think its stupid.


marc801


Oct 4, 2010, 1:55 PM
Post #51 of 225 (8716 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (9 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
...I still won't stick clip because I think its stupid I'm a stubborn jackass.
Fixy.


jakedatc


Oct 4, 2010, 2:04 PM
Post #52 of 225 (8709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.
Why would you let a question of style keep you from climbing a good route?

He has quite a long list of reasons why he won't try hard...ever. among others are too hot, too cold, too scared, too hard, too steep, too crimpy, too slopey,..........

yeah, yeah Jake you climb hard. we know how hard you climb. you climb FUCKING HARD. but knowing how hard of a climber you are, how big your sack is, and how little I am compared to you, I still won't stick clip because I think its stupid.

I didn't say CLIMB hard.. i said TRY hard. I don't give a flying fuck if someone climbs 5.8 or 5.13+ but give an honest effort.

you will be missing 3 star routes at the Red if you don't have a stick clip.


Gmburns2000


Oct 4, 2010, 2:31 PM
Post #53 of 225 (8696 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [jakedatc] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.
Why would you let a question of style keep you from climbing a good route?

He has quite a long list of reasons why he won't try hard...ever. among others are too hot, too cold, too scared, too hard, too steep, too crimpy, too slopey,..........

yeah, yeah Jake you climb hard. we know how hard you climb. you climb FUCKING HARD. but knowing how hard of a climber you are, how big your sack is, and how little I am compared to you, I still won't stick clip because I think its stupid.

I didn't say CLIMB hard.. i said TRY hard. I don't give a flying fuck if someone climbs 5.8 or 5.13+ but give an honest effort.

you will be missing 3 star routes at the Red if you don't have a stick clip.

FYI - you've climbed with me ONCE, and that was a shitty, cold, rainy weekend this past spring when NO ONE wanted to be there. As a group of four we did, what, five climbs the entire weekend? Yeah, that's a good representation of me pushing my limits.

I hear there are thousands of climbs in the Red. I'm sure I'll find more than enough 3-star climbs to enjoy myself.


blueeyedclimber


Oct 4, 2010, 2:41 PM
Post #54 of 225 (8690 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Normally I would love to join in and bash sport climbers with you (more specifically to get under Jake's skin Wink), but there are a lot of routes that you would be stupid to not stick clip them. If you don't believe me, go do Flying Hawaiian at Rumney without stick clipping and report back to me. Angelic

I can't recall finding any gear that was useless, but I did see someone climbing a steep route at the Gunks, carry a #5 and #6 camalot. Theres not too many overhanging offwidths at the Gunks. Cool

Josh


MS1


Oct 4, 2010, 3:12 PM
Post #55 of 225 (8678 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?

feels a lot different to me. generally speaking, if I don't feel comfortable putting in that first piece because of its location (or in this case, clipping the first draw) then I will very likely not lead it.

I totally get and understand the first bolt being high for the second bolt concept, but I'd still rather either walk away or clip the first bolt as I climb.
Why would you let a question of style keep you from climbing a good route?

He has quite a long list of reasons why he won't try hard...ever. among others are too hot, too cold, too scared, too hard, too steep, too crimpy, too slopey,..........

yeah, yeah Jake you climb hard. we know how hard you climb. you climb FUCKING HARD. but knowing how hard of a climber you are, how big your sack is, and how little I am compared to you, I still won't stick clip because I think its stupid.

I didn't say CLIMB hard.. i said TRY hard. I don't give a flying fuck if someone climbs 5.8 or 5.13+ but give an honest effort.

you will be missing 3 star routes at the Red if you don't have a stick clip.

FYI - you've climbed with me ONCE, and that was a shitty, cold, rainy weekend this past spring when NO ONE wanted to be there. As a group of four we did, what, five climbs the entire weekend? Yeah, that's a good representation of me pushing my limits.

I hear there are thousands of climbs in the Red. I'm sure I'll find more than enough 3-star climbs to enjoy myself.

On a good number of Red classics, the technical crux is getting to the first bolt. So you might find it hard to push your limits without stick-clipping.


rangerrob


Oct 4, 2010, 4:02 PM
Post #56 of 225 (8661 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 8, 2003
Posts: 641

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (9 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR


kachoong


Oct 4, 2010, 4:27 PM
Post #57 of 225 (8644 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh, by far the grappling hook. So many cons! Those bloody things keep snagging shit all the time, claw at the back of my knees. They really do cause some panic when I have all the sizes slung on one side of my harness; I'm always reaching down and adjusting them. They don't always catch the first time, gouging holes in my forehead when I don't grab for them properly on their way back down. You can't put them in your carry-on luggage. Also, the red size for some reason doesn't sit tight when oriented for a sideways pull... walks all over the fucking place! Damn grappling hooks suck!


blueeyedclimber


Oct 4, 2010, 4:33 PM
Post #58 of 225 (8641 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [rangerrob] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

That's because you don't understand sport climbing.



In reply to:
It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

Oh wait, yes you do. Nevermind Cool

Josh


jakedatc


Oct 4, 2010, 4:35 PM
Post #59 of 225 (8638 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [rangerrob] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

so.. because a type of rock doesn't take gear it is absurd. good. thanks for that contrived and ridiculous point of view. you should probably just not say anything.

Sport climbing should not be bolted dangerously, ever. Which conflicts with your statement about stick clipping because having the first bolt clipped keeps you off the deck if the landing sucks. having a bolt lower would not solve the problem Crazy

Sport climbing you either can pull a move or you can't clipping the bolts is a secondary activity like tying your shoes.


dm


Oct 4, 2010, 5:17 PM
Post #60 of 225 (8614 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 31, 2004
Posts: 90

Re: [rangerrob] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic...

if he really did he'd also skip the rap bolts. Accepting one aspect of the sport climbing game (rap bolting for safety) but not the other (bolting it with a stick clip in mind for the very same reason) is about as bright as driving around in a Lexus with brake lines cut. But then again, whatever floats his goat.


(This post was edited by dm on Oct 4, 2010, 6:42 PM)


Partner devkrev


Oct 4, 2010, 5:21 PM
Post #61 of 225 (8611 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 28, 2004
Posts: 933

Re: [rangerrob] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

Yeah, I would definitely say trying to bring trad climbing ethics to a sport crag is not very useful.

Kind of like a stick-clip at a trad crag.

dev


rangerrob


Oct 4, 2010, 11:32 PM
Post #62 of 225 (8552 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 8, 2003
Posts: 641

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (7 ratings)  
Can't Post

Exactly Dev, which is why I don't. And for the record i didn't say that just because a piece of rock doesn't take gear well that it is absurd to climb it. I said the fundamental idea of sport climbing to me, is absurd. You just took it personally that's all jake. Besides, every sport route could be led on trad gear, just with varying amounts of risk. When you bolt it you're just altering it to fit the level of safety you are comfortable with.

Back to the argument......the smallest tricam is pretty damned worthless, as is the biggest tricam.

RR


Gmburns2000


Oct 4, 2010, 11:46 PM
Post #63 of 225 (8545 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [rangerrob] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

quoted just because it is well said, and to remind people once again that the question was, in fact, posted in the trad forum.


petsfed


Oct 5, 2010, 12:28 AM
Post #64 of 225 (8528 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599

Re: [shoo] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shoo wrote:
Before his devolves into another "I love/hate tricame" thread, let me get it over with and say shut up, you're wrong.

But how else will I get an erection?


jakedatc


Oct 5, 2010, 12:36 AM
Post #65 of 225 (8521 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

quoted just because it is well said, and to remind people once again that the question was, in fact, posted in the trad forum.

Then WHY did you put : stick clip

gumbie


jakedatc


Oct 5, 2010, 12:38 AM
Post #66 of 225 (8521 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [rangerrob] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

rangerrob wrote:
Exactly Dev, which is why I don't. And for the record i didn't say that just because a piece of rock doesn't take gear well that it is absurd to climb it. I said the fundamental idea of sport climbing to me, is absurd. You just took it personally that's all jake. Besides, every sport route could be led on trad gear, just with varying amounts of risk. When you bolt it you're just altering it to fit the level of safety you are comfortable with.

Back to the argument......the smallest tricam is pretty damned worthless, as is the biggest tricam.

RR

aka free solo or taped on hooks on terrain at your limit.. yea.. totally not absurd. you an KN could be good fuck buddies.


dr_feelgood


Oct 5, 2010, 12:48 AM
Post #67 of 225 (8517 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [bearbreeder] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bearbreeder wrote:
tricams r awwwsum ... i place them on every moderate climb in squamish/rockies ...

they work great as a second set of nuts/cams and r much lighter to boot

for alpine you can just bring em instead of cams since they also work in lightly iced cracks

useless??? ... everything is useless till nothing else will fit ... lol

Did you finally finish that GED program?


dr_feelgood


Oct 5, 2010, 1:05 AM
Post #68 of 225 (8504 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [kachoong] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. So many cons! Those bloody things keep snagging shit all the time, claw at the back of my knees. They really do cause some panic when I have all the sizes slung on one side of my harness; I'm always reaching down and adjusting them. They don't always catch the first time, gouging holes in my forehead when I don't grab for them properly on their way back down. You can't put them in your carry-on luggage. Also, the red size for some reason doesn't sit tight when oriented for a sideways pull... walks all over the fucking place! Damn grappling hooks suck!

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth. That way it does not hit you in the leg, head, or carry-on baggage.

Most useful piece of gear ever, imo.




jt512


Oct 5, 2010, 1:20 AM
Post #69 of 225 (8495 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (9 ratings)  
Can't Post

Most worthless piece of gear? The Rock Exotica BiWire Carabiner:




Honorable mention: The Black Diamond ATC–n00b:



Jay


milesenoell


Oct 5, 2010, 2:24 AM
Post #70 of 225 (8469 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Most worthless piece of gear? The Rock Exotica BiWire Carabiner:


This one intrigues me.

Clearly you aren't going to be clipping it on lead, but it probably saves a decent bit of weight in place of a locker.

The more I think about it, I'm curious as to how it compares to a locker for security. Locking sleeves can get spun open in use after all.


quiteatingmysteak


Oct 5, 2010, 7:23 AM
Post #71 of 225 (8429 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [rangerrob] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rangerrob wrote:
I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm.

...

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.


Sport climbing tactics and ethics in the same post... rad!


Partner devkrev


Oct 5, 2010, 7:49 AM
Post #72 of 225 (8425 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 28, 2004
Posts: 933

Re: [dr_feelgood] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. So many cons! Those bloody things keep snagging shit all the time, claw at the back of my knees. They really do cause some panic when I have all the sizes slung on one side of my harness; I'm always reaching down and adjusting them. They don't always catch the first time, gouging holes in my forehead when I don't grab for them properly on their way back down. You can't put them in your carry-on luggage. Also, the red size for some reason doesn't sit tight when oriented for a sideways pull... walks all over the fucking place! Damn grappling hooks suck!

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth. That way it does not hit you in the leg, head, or carry-on baggage.

Most useful piece of gear ever, imo.

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/Dr_feelgood/P1000652.jpg[/IMG]


jeez, are you guys freakin' ninjas or something?


Guran


Oct 5, 2010, 10:22 AM
Post #73 of 225 (8416 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2008
Posts: 220

Re: [jakedatc] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
Sport climbing should not be bolted dangerously, ever. Which conflicts with your statement about stick clipping because having the first bolt clipped keeps you off the deck if the landing sucks. having a bolt lower would not solve the problem Crazy

Sure it would. Just grid-bolt the route and voila, no need to stick clip.
If the first bolt can be reached from the ground and all bolts are close enough to the previuos one there is never ground fall potential.

Granted, the route might be considered "lame".


Gmburns2000


Oct 5, 2010, 11:56 AM
Post #74 of 225 (8397 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [jakedatc] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

quoted just because it is well said, and to remind people once again that the question was, in fact, posted in the trad forum.

Then WHY did you put : stick clip

gumbie

because it's worthless

idiot.


carabiner96


Oct 5, 2010, 1:13 PM
Post #75 of 225 (8378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

quoted just because it is well said, and to remind people once again that the question was, in fact, posted in the trad forum.

Then WHY did you put : stick clip

gumbie

because it's worthless

idiot.

Aww. Young love.


carabiner96


Oct 5, 2010, 1:14 PM
Post #76 of 225 (5549 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Most worthless piece of gear? The Rock Exotica BiWire Carabiner:

[img]http://www.gear.com/wp-content/images/posts/full_225_3.jpg[/img]


Honorable mention: The Black Diamond ATC–n00b:

[img]http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com/uploads/products/6/2/0/620052_atcsport_rb.jpg[/img]

Jay

Not sure why everyone is one starring this post, I think he's suggested the winners in this thread so far.


rsmillbern


Oct 5, 2010, 2:47 PM
Post #77 of 225 (5523 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 319

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Most worthless piece of gear? The Rock Exotica BiWire Carabiner:

[img]http://www.gear.com/wp-content/images/posts/full_225_3.jpg[/img]


Honorable mention: The Black Diamond ATC–n00b:

[img]http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com/uploads/products/6/2/0/620052_atcsport_rb.jpg[/img]

Jay

+1
WTF the 2 rope ATC is too heavy? Belay with a munter...


hafilax


Oct 5, 2010, 3:13 PM
Post #78 of 225 (5508 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [carabiner96] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Most worthless piece of gear? The Rock Exotica BiWire Carabiner:

[img]http://www.gear.com/wp-content/images/posts/full_225_3.jpg[/img]


Honorable mention: The Black Diamond ATC–n00b:

[img]http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com/uploads/products/6/2/0/620052_atcsport_rb.jpg[/img]

Jay

Not sure why everyone is one starring this post, I think he's suggested the winners in this thread so far.
He's got a hate club that one stars all his posts regardless of the content.


dynosore


Oct 5, 2010, 3:29 PM
Post #79 of 225 (5499 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2004
Posts: 1768

Re: [rangerrob] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (7 ratings)  
Can't Post

rangerrob wrote:
The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

RR

It's simple really. You can spray about how you "led" xyz even though you effectively toproped the crux and fell 15 times before sending it. Too many people way too worried about what grade they can climb to impress other people. You know what impresses me? A guy who can walk up to any 5.9 crack, offwidth, or face climb and trad lead it, onsight. That impresses me. Not another dime a dozen spraybot that "leads" 5.12 with a stickclip and takes 3 weeks to work a climb into submission.


Partner cracklover


Oct 5, 2010, 3:55 PM
Post #80 of 225 (5481 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
If you don't believe me, go do Flying Hawaiian at Rumney without stick clipping and report back to me. Angelic

Twice. But I'm not too bright.

GO


lvpyne


Oct 5, 2010, 8:20 PM
Post #81 of 225 (5450 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 7, 2005
Posts: 207

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
I can't recall finding any gear that was useless, but I did see someone climbing a steep route at the Gunks, carry a #5 and #6 camalot. Theres not too many overhanging offwidths at the Gunks.

I'm slowly coming to terms with this and I'm distraught...I hung my 5s, 6s, and 9s up on my gear rack this week and realized that they're not going to get much love for a while...


julio412


Oct 5, 2010, 9:03 PM
Post #82 of 225 (5431 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 16, 2005
Posts: 144

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I bought a couple of these for a Scotland trip a couple of winters ago.
Used them as lockers at belays- they worked great.
Most lockers in shitty(Scottish) conditions will eventually just freeze up; then you're kind of fucked.
Gave one to a Scottish guide even; he could easily the benefits.
Mario


AntinJ


Oct 5, 2010, 10:02 PM
Post #83 of 225 (5412 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 4, 2008
Posts: 475

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 
My Steel Omega Pacific locking carabiner. I bought it when I was first learning to set up top-ropes.....

What a waste of moolah. But look at the bright side; next time I need 62kN of holding power, I know where to find it!




hafilax


Oct 5, 2010, 10:25 PM
Post #84 of 225 (5401 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [AntinJ] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

AntinJ wrote:
My Steel Omega Pacific locking carabiner. I bought it when I was first learning to set up top-ropes.....

What a waste of moolah. But look at the bright side; next time I need 62kN of holding power, I know where to find it!

[image]http://media.rei.com/media/801624.jpg[/image]
When I started I was told to get a few meters of tubular webbing. At one point I used it to tie up a hammock but that's about it. I don't think I have enough for a slackline.


technogeekery


Oct 6, 2010, 12:12 AM
Post #85 of 225 (5383 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2009
Posts: 146

Re: [hafilax] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Its not intrinsically useless - but about the only piece of gear I have that I don't use is my daisy chain. I bought it when I got back into climbing 2 years ago after a long break, and saw a lot of people using them as tethers on sport climbs and multipitch. Then I remembered / worked out / learned about 3 better and safer ways to do each of the things I had been using it for, and retired it.


Perihelion


Oct 6, 2010, 4:44 AM
Post #86 of 225 (5343 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

devkrev wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. ...

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth.

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/Dr_feelgood/P1000652.jpg[/IMG]


jeez, are you guys freakin' ninjas or something?

I'm going to go with "or something," by which I mean "moron." Why in the world would you be carrying that thing? I try to maintain a broad perspective of things I don't quite personally appreciate, but this one is pushing the envelope. So you're flinging that thing up the rock and you can't figure out why it comes back to hit you? And for that you blame the hook? And, if it does snag, you'd trust a piece that just randomly snagged a rock or a root? Moron! Moron! MOR-RON!!


moose_droppings


Oct 6, 2010, 6:27 AM
Post #87 of 225 (5331 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Perihelion wrote:
devkrev wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. ...

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth.

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/Dr_feelgood/P1000652.jpg[/IMG]


jeez, are you guys freakin' ninjas or something?

I'm going to go with "or something," by which I mean "moron." Why in the world would you be carrying that thing? I try to maintain a broad perspective of things I don't quite personally appreciate, but this one is pushing the envelope. So you're flinging that thing up the rock and you can't figure out why it comes back to hit you? And for that you blame the hook? And, if it does snag, you'd trust a piece that just randomly snagged a rock or a root? Moron! Moron! MOR-RON!!

I'm quoting this one before it gets away.


redlude97


Oct 6, 2010, 7:11 AM
Post #88 of 225 (5319 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2008
Posts: 990

Re: [moose_droppings] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
devkrev wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. ...

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth.

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/Dr_feelgood/P1000652.jpg[/IMG]


jeez, are you guys freakin' ninjas or something?

I'm going to go with "or something," by which I mean "moron." Why in the world would you be carrying that thing? I try to maintain a broad perspective of things I don't quite personally appreciate, but this one is pushing the envelope. So you're flinging that thing up the rock and you can't figure out why it comes back to hit you? And for that you blame the hook? And, if it does snag, you'd trust a piece that just randomly snagged a rock or a root? Moron! Moron! MOR-RON!!

I'm quoting this one before it gets away.
That could be the post of the year


c4c


Oct 6, 2010, 10:30 AM
Post #89 of 225 (5305 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

devkrev wrote:
Hey,
I found myself finding very few nut placements on Chapel Pond Slab in the Dacks. I remember being happy that my fiancee decided to bring extra small cams. I would be tempted to not bring nuts at all, but that would make for some expensive bailing if need be.

I just established a new route only a mile or two up the road from chapel pond slab called Chock full o' nuts that you could use all of your nuts before the first belay. It all depends on the route that you are on.


dingus


Oct 6, 2010, 12:32 PM
Post #90 of 225 (5284 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [julio412] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

julio412 wrote:
I bought a couple of these for a Scotland trip a couple of winters ago.
Used them as lockers at belays- they worked great.
Most lockers in shitty(Scottish) conditions will eventually just freeze up; then you're kind of fucked.
Gave one to a Scottish guide even; he could easily the benefits.
Mario

Ah the only think your Scottish climbing and SoCal sport climbing have in common are the attitudes.

Hehe. And that is IT. Even the ropes are different.

DMT


rangerrob


Oct 6, 2010, 12:51 PM
Post #91 of 225 (5274 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 8, 2003
Posts: 641

Re: [dingus] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I love the "I established a new route" when he is telling someone about a another climb to try. Notice he didn't just say "there is route just down the road that would be better for you". He had to add the "I established it" part. I love it!! We all want our recognition, right?


carabiner96


Oct 6, 2010, 1:13 PM
Post #92 of 225 (5269 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610

Re: [rangerrob] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

rangerrob wrote:
I love the "I established a new route" when he is telling someone about a another climb to try. Notice he didn't just say "there is route just down the road that would be better for you". He had to add the "I established it" part. I love it!! We all want our recognition, right?

I think you're reading too much into it, Mr. 'My shit smells so much like roses that I'm too good for bolts, lookahme! Lookahme!.'

C4C, can you pm me deets? I'd love to hop on it next weekend...is it north or south>


jakedatc


Oct 6, 2010, 1:46 PM
Post #93 of 225 (5253 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [carabiner96] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I love the "I established a new route" when he is telling someone about a another climb to try. Notice he didn't just say "there is route just down the road that would be better for you". He had to add the "I established it" part. I love it!! We all want our recognition, right?

I think you're reading too much into it, Mr. 'My shit smells so much like roses that I'm too good for bolts, lookahme! Lookahme!.'

C4C, can you pm me deets? I'd love to hop on it next weekend...is it north or south>

HA :checks clipboard: ZING!


Perihelion


Oct 6, 2010, 3:02 PM
Post #94 of 225 (5223 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [redlude97] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

redlude97 wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
devkrev wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. ...

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth.

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/Dr_feelgood/P1000652.jpg[/IMG]


jeez, are you guys freakin' ninjas or something?

I'm going to go with "or something," by which I mean "moron." Why in the world would you be carrying that thing? I try to maintain a broad perspective of things I don't quite personally appreciate, but this one is pushing the envelope. So you're flinging that thing up the rock and you can't figure out why it comes back to hit you? And for that you blame the hook? And, if it does snag, you'd trust a piece that just randomly snagged a rock or a root? Moron! Moron! MOR-RON!!

I'm quoting this one before it gets away.
That could be the post of the year

Could be... not. The original post was a troll. That's OK -- I had a good rant and felt better afterwards. Tongue

On topic, I'll nominate the Metolius PAS as the most worthless piece of gear I personally own. For $25 you get 1/6 the functionality of $4 worth of 7mm accessory cord. On the bright side, at least the PAS gets in your way all the time and it is not at all versatile. Such a deal.


MS1


Oct 6, 2010, 3:11 PM
Post #95 of 225 (5214 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Perihelion wrote:
redlude97 wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
devkrev wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. ...

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth.

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/Dr_feelgood/P1000652.jpg[/IMG]


jeez, are you guys freakin' ninjas or something?

I'm going to go with "or something," by which I mean "moron." Why in the world would you be carrying that thing? I try to maintain a broad perspective of things I don't quite personally appreciate, but this one is pushing the envelope. So you're flinging that thing up the rock and you can't figure out why it comes back to hit you? And for that you blame the hook? And, if it does snag, you'd trust a piece that just randomly snagged a rock or a root? Moron! Moron! MOR-RON!!

I'm quoting this one before it gets away.
That could be the post of the year

Could be... not. The original post was a troll. That's OK -- I had a good rant and felt better afterwards. Tongue

On topic, I'll nominate the Metolius PAS as the most worthless piece of gear I personally own. For $25 you get 1/6 the functionality of $4 worth of 7mm accessory cord. On the bright side, at least the PAS gets in your way all the time and it is not at all versatile. Such a deal.

+1. But I would go farther: The PAS is actually worse than a $4 piece of nylon cord, due to its use of high-tech, low-stretch materials.


Perihelion


Oct 6, 2010, 4:19 PM
Post #96 of 225 (5188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [MS1] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

MS1 wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
[
On topic, I'll nominate the Metolius PAS as the most worthless piece of gear I personally own. For $25 you get 1/6 the functionality of $4 worth of 7mm accessory cord. On the bright side, at least the PAS gets in your way all the time and it is not at all versatile. Such a deal.

+1. But I would go farther: The PAS is actually worse than a $4 piece of nylon cord, due to its use of high-tech, low-stretch materials.

That is my other major objection to the PAS. I've decided that I will not use a static personal anchor. I doubt I'll ever fall directly onto my anchor, because I am careful not to put myself into a situation where that is a likely outcome. But, if I ever systematically screw up every step of the process and manage to fall on my anchor, I see no reason to make the situation even worse by landing on a static tie-in.

I have settled on a Purcel prusik made with 7mm, all-nylon cord as my personal anchor. I don't use a daisy chain, but if I did, I'd pick one made of nylon with the "weak" 300lbf loop stitching.


(This post was edited by Perihelion on Oct 6, 2010, 4:20 PM)


dingus


Oct 6, 2010, 4:46 PM
Post #97 of 225 (5173 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

The turn around away from personal anchor systems such as PAS and daisies and cordalettes is both heartening and amazing.

My work seems done here.

DMT


karmiclimber


Oct 6, 2010, 4:54 PM
Post #98 of 225 (5166 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [technogeekery] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

technogeekery wrote:
Its not intrinsically useless - but about the only piece of gear I have that I don't use is my daisy chain. I bought it when I got back into climbing 2 years ago after a long break, and saw a lot of people using them as tethers on sport climbs and multipitch. Then I remembered / worked out / learned about 3 better and safer ways to do each of the things I had been using it for, and retired it.

I use mine as a gear sling...it actually works really well.


Perihelion


Oct 6, 2010, 6:41 PM
Post #99 of 225 (5127 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [dingus] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
The turn around away from personal anchor systems such as PAS and daisies and cordalettes is both heartening and amazing.

My work seems done here.

DMT

Your work might be done here, but I think you still need to go forth unto the Land, and spread the Word, for yea, the infidels remain ignorant. We need a Prophet, someone with a venerable name such as "dingus", "dorkus", or "doofus." If you can perform a laying on of hands and lift the veil of ignorance from the masses, even a name such as yours shall be celebrated long after your untimely death due to autoerotic asphyxiation (one of the diverse uses for a Purcel prusik, or so I hear).

Cool


dingus


Oct 6, 2010, 6:45 PM
Post #100 of 225 (5123 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Perihelion wrote:
even a name such as yours shall be celebrated long after your untimely death due to autoerotic asphyxiation (one of the diverse uses for a Purcel prusik, or so I hear).

Cool

I know enough to grab the right neck when choking my chicken. Whaddaya think I'm NEW?

DMT


notapplicable


Oct 6, 2010, 6:56 PM
Post #101 of 225 (6507 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771

Re: [carabiner96] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

quoted just because it is well said, and to remind people once again that the question was, in fact, posted in the trad forum.

Then WHY did you put : stick clip

gumbie

because it's worthless

idiot.

Aww. Young love.

When I first saw the title to this thread I told myself, "Bryan, don't read that thread. Just don't fuckin do it."

And then I read it anyway. *facepalm*


carabiner96


Oct 6, 2010, 7:17 PM
Post #102 of 225 (6490 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610

Re: [notapplicable] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

notapplicable wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

quoted just because it is well said, and to remind people once again that the question was, in fact, posted in the trad forum.

Then WHY did you put : stick clip

gumbie

because it's worthless

idiot.

Aww. Young love.

When I first saw the title to this thread I told myself, "Bryan, don't read that thread. Just don't fuckin do it."

And then I read it anyway. *facepalm*

Then you have no one to blame but yourself.


dingus


Oct 6, 2010, 7:19 PM
Post #103 of 225 (6487 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [carabiner96] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
notapplicable wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

quoted just because it is well said, and to remind people once again that the question was, in fact, posted in the trad forum.

Then WHY did you put : stick clip

gumbie

because it's worthless

idiot.

Aww. Young love.

When I first saw the title to this thread I told myself, "Bryan, don't read that thread. Just don't fuckin do it."

And then I read it anyway. *facepalm*

Then you have no one to blame but yourself.

Cavet Emptor.

DMT


MS1


Oct 6, 2010, 8:58 PM
Post #104 of 225 (6446 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560

Re: [dingus] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
notapplicable wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

quoted just because it is well said, and to remind people once again that the question was, in fact, posted in the trad forum.

Then WHY did you put : stick clip

gumbie

because it's worthless

idiot.

Aww. Young love.

When I first saw the title to this thread I told myself, "Bryan, don't read that thread. Just don't fuckin do it."

And then I read it anyway. *facepalm*

Then you have no one to blame but yourself.

Caveat EmptorLector.

DMT

(This obnoxious correction was brought to you by your friendly neighborhood Latin nazi.)


erisspirit


Oct 6, 2010, 9:07 PM
Post #105 of 225 (6437 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770

Re: [hafilax] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
AntinJ wrote:
My Steel Omega Pacific locking carabiner. I bought it when I was first learning to set up top-ropes.....

What a waste of moolah. But look at the bright side; next time I need 62kN of holding power, I know where to find it!

[image]http://media.rei.com/media/801624.jpg[/image]
When I started I was told to get a few meters of tubular webbing. At one point I used it to tie up a hammock but that's about it. I don't think I have enough for a slackline.

Yeah the only time I needed any of that was to replace a dying rap station in JTree.


dr_feelgood


Oct 7, 2010, 12:45 AM
Post #106 of 225 (6401 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [moose_droppings] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
devkrev wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. ...

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth.



jeez, are you guys freakin' ninjas or something?

I'm going to go with "or something," by which I mean "moron." Why in the world would you be carrying that thing? I try to maintain a broad perspective of things I don't quite personally appreciate, but this one is pushing the envelope. So you're flinging that thing up the rock and you can't figure out why it comes back to hit you? And for that you blame the hook? And, if it does snag, you'd trust a piece that just randomly snagged a rock or a root? Moron! Moron! MOR-RON!!

I'm quoting this one before it gets away.

I am the wave of the motherfucking future. WI6=WI4 with that motherfucker.


c4c


Oct 7, 2010, 1:53 AM
Post #107 of 225 (6381 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: [carabiner96] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I love the "I established a new route" when he is telling someone about a another climb to try. Notice he didn't just say "there is route just down the road that would be better for you". He had to add the "I established it" part. I love it!! We all want our recognition, right?

I think you're reading too much into it, Mr. 'My shit smells so much like roses that I'm too good for bolts, lookahme! Lookahme!.'

C4C, can you pm me deets? I'd love to hop on it next weekend...is it north or south>

PM sent (no stick clip required)


moose_droppings


Oct 7, 2010, 2:39 AM
Post #108 of 225 (6359 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [dr_feelgood] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
devkrev wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. ...

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth.

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/Dr_feelgood/P1000652.jpg[/IMG]


jeez, are you guys freakin' ninjas or something?

I'm going to go with "or something," by which I mean "moron." Why in the world would you be carrying that thing? I try to maintain a broad perspective of things I don't quite personally appreciate, but this one is pushing the envelope. So you're flinging that thing up the rock and you can't figure out why it comes back to hit you? And for that you blame the hook? And, if it does snag, you'd trust a piece that just randomly snagged a rock or a root? Moron! Moron! MOR-RON!!

I'm quoting this one before it gets away.

I am the wave of the motherfucking future. WI6=WI4 with that motherfucker.

Useless without the cannon launcher that goes with it.


climbingaggie03


Oct 7, 2010, 3:27 AM
Post #109 of 225 (6344 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: 1173

Re: [moose_droppings] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adjustable aider from metolious, that was useless.


Colinhoglund


Oct 7, 2010, 5:33 AM
Post #110 of 225 (6321 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 5, 2008
Posts: 338

Re: [dr_feelgood] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
devkrev wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. ...

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth.

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/Dr_feelgood/P1000652.jpg[/IMG]

jeez, are you guys freakin' ninjas or something?

I'm going to go with "or something," by which I mean "moron." Why in the world would you be carrying that thing? I try to maintain a broad perspective of things I don't quite personally appreciate, but this one is pushing the envelope. So you're flinging that thing up the rock and you can't figure out why it comes back to hit you? And for that you blame the hook? And, if it does snag, you'd trust a piece that just randomly snagged a rock or a root? Moron! Moron! MOR-RON!!

I'm quoting this one before it gets away.

WOW, that reply made my day. Hook line and sinker. The angry ones are never right Laugh


kachoong


Oct 7, 2010, 12:33 PM
Post #111 of 225 (6291 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [dr_feelgood] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
devkrev wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Oh, by far the grappling hook. ...

Fucking n00b. You need a grappling hook with retractable teeth.



jeez, are you guys freakin' ninjas or something?

I'm going to go with "or something," by which I mean "moron." Why in the world would you be carrying that thing? I try to maintain a broad perspective of things I don't quite personally appreciate, but this one is pushing the envelope. So you're flinging that thing up the rock and you can't figure out why it comes back to hit you? And for that you blame the hook? And, if it does snag, you'd trust a piece that just randomly snagged a rock or a root? Moron! Moron! MOR-RON!!

I'm quoting this one before it gets away.

I am the wave of the motherfucking future. WI6=WI4 with that motherfucker.

Yeah, instant hanging belay, whether you wanted one or not.


julio412


Oct 7, 2010, 1:17 PM
Post #112 of 225 (6275 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 16, 2005
Posts: 144

Re: [kachoong] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I was with an old climbing buddy (over 25 years climbing together) awhile back cruising through an irrigation canal up in the mountains- man, I wish I had a grappling hook.
And, I think and agree on on one aspect of this thread.
Sport Climbing is neither Sport nor Climbing.
And the most worthless piece of gear is the one you don't have the imagination to figure out how to use.


Partner camhead


Oct 7, 2010, 1:43 PM
Post #113 of 225 (6260 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [climbingaggie03] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbingaggie03 wrote:
adjustable aider from metolious, that was useless.

I've not used the adjustable aider, but adjustable daisies are AWESOME for aiding and route development.


Partner xtrmecat


Oct 7, 2010, 1:58 PM
Post #114 of 225 (6254 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 548

Re: [climbingaggie03] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbingaggie03 wrote:
adjustable aider from metolious, that was useless.

Umm. These are my primary aiders. I don't even take ladders with me anymore. No need. Maybe more practice.

Burly Bob


Guran


Oct 7, 2010, 2:09 PM
Post #115 of 225 (6249 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2008
Posts: 220

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Piece of gear most worthless on one route, while being essential on another: (drum roll) The quick draw.


hafilax


Oct 7, 2010, 3:08 PM
Post #116 of 225 (6229 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [Guran] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

The old DMM belay master. Having to lock the biner to close the plastic doohickey or have it catch on everything or ripped off relegated it to the bottom of the gear bin.


dingus


Oct 7, 2010, 3:30 PM
Post #117 of 225 (6218 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [julio412] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

julio412 wrote:
I was with an old climbing buddy (over 25 years climbing together) awhile back cruising through an irrigation canal up in the mountains- man, I wish I had a grappling hook.
And, I think and agree on on one aspect of this thread.
Sport Climbing is neither Sport nor Climbing.
And the most worthless piece of gear is the one you don't have the imagination to figure out how to use.

Hah! So I'm not the only one.

Stu and I rode our mtn bikes down the edge of an irrigation canal past some no trespass signs. The 'trail' along side the canal went from bad to worse to non-existent at a bridge. The canal was empty and about, oh, 10-12 feet deep I reckon. Very steep sides, U-shaped bottom like a glacier carved canyon.

OK so we lowered our bikes into the canal and proceeded to our destination. When we arrived at the base of the our target crag, we just left the bikes in the ditch.

To get out, I boosted Stu up so he could grab the lip and mantle out. With suitable jumping and one-arming we figgered we could get out on our own, but boosting was a lot easier. When he was up he just offered me his arm - I grabbed his hand like a hand hold and yarded on up

So we went and we sent! New route, one pitch. While contemplating if there was time to do another, we heard a strange sound.

Looked around a while, nothing.

Then Stu was all,

"dude, they turned the water on. LOOK!" He points to the canal and sure enough there is water coming down the thing! Not a deluge, at least not yet, we could actually see the wave front of the advancing water.

I have no idea if someone saw us and decided to flush us out or if it was just bad timing on our part, but we had to skeddadle!

Laughing at our predicament we went back to the bikes, now in a foot of rapidly moving and rapidly rising water! Hah!

Again I boosted Stu up to the rim, then passed him our packs and then one by one the bikes as well. When it was my turn, Stu stood up, looked down at me, grinned and said....

"Do I know you?"

BASTARD!

True dat.

DMT


(This post was edited by dingus on Oct 7, 2010, 3:31 PM)


Partner cracklover


Oct 7, 2010, 4:05 PM
Post #118 of 225 (6197 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [dingus] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I honestly have never bought a piece of climbing gear I didn't get a lot of use out of. I just wanted to post to the thread to say thanks for the story, Dingus!

I haven't been on rc.com much lately, but stuff like that reminds me of why I keep coming back.

GO


boymeetsrock


Oct 7, 2010, 4:36 PM
Post #119 of 225 (6183 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709

Re: [cracklover] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
<snip> thanks for the story, Dingus!

GO

+1


dr_feelgood


Oct 7, 2010, 5:39 PM
Post #120 of 225 (6152 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (7 ratings)  
Can't Post

I would like to nominate a piece of gear as the most useless item:

Jakedatc's rack.

It is an antiquated, mostly second hand pile of rusted crap. The majority of the pieces are blue tcu sized, and it is quite greasy while reeking strongly of neglect and cabbage.

The only reason that he is still alive is because no part of his rack has made contact with the rock for as long as he has owned it.

Quite nauseating, really.


jakedatc


Oct 7, 2010, 6:12 PM
Post #121 of 225 (6160 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [dr_feelgood] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
I would like to nominate a piece of gear as the most useless item:

Jakedatc's rack.

It is an antiquated, mostly second hand pile of rusted crap. The majority of the pieces are blue tcu sized, and it is quite greasy while reeking strongly of neglect and cabbage.

The only reason that he is still alive is because no part of his rack has made contact with the rock for as long as he has owned it.

Quite nauseating, really.

KNOT TREW!!!111 Pirate


c4c


Oct 7, 2010, 11:35 PM
Post #122 of 225 (6092 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: [dr_feelgood] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
I would like to nominate a piece of gear as the most useless item:

Jakedatc's rack.

It is an antiquated, mostly second hand pile of rusted crap. The majority of the pieces are blue tcu sized, and it is quite greasy while reeking strongly of neglect and cabbage.

The only reason that he is still alive is because no part of his rack has made contact with the rock for as long as he has owned it.

Quite nauseating, really.

1z tru! 1 haz scene it!


giggly


Oct 8, 2010, 12:00 AM
Post #123 of 225 (6082 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2010
Posts: 64

Re: [c4c] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

a helmet


Perihelion


Oct 8, 2010, 4:43 PM
Post #124 of 225 (6017 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [Colinhoglund] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

"Colinhoglund wrote:
WOW, that reply made my day. Hook line and sinker. The angry ones are never right Laugh

yep, I admit it, I swallowed the bait. But like I said, I took a good rant and felt much lighter afterwards, so it wasn't a total loss. Smile

Editing to add a P.S.: I misunderstood the first poster, who was actually talking about the familiar grappling hook/cliffhanger. I don't think those items are worthless, but I can appreciate the bit about racking hooks and having them fly back into your face. The second guy, the one who posted the picture, is apparently channeling 007/Batman, and I'll stand by my comments about him... moron. WI6 to WI4, indeed. Right-O. (Of course I mean that in the nicest possible way, as far he knows.)


(This post was edited by Perihelion on Oct 8, 2010, 5:10 PM)


kachoong


Oct 8, 2010, 5:44 PM
Post #125 of 225 (5990 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Perihelion wrote:
"Colinhoglund wrote:
WOW, that reply made my day. Hook line and sinker. The angry ones are never right Laugh

yep, I admit it, I swallowed the bait. But like I said, I took a good rant and felt much lighter afterwards, so it wasn't a total loss. Smile

Editing to add a P.S.: I misunderstood the first poster, who was actually talking about the familiar grappling hook/cliffhanger. I don't think those items are worthless, but I can appreciate the bit about racking hooks and having them fly back into your face. The second guy, the one who posted the picture, is apparently channeling 007/Batman, and I'll stand by my comments about him... moron. WI6 to WI4, indeed. Right-O. (Of course I mean that in the nicest possible way, as far he knows.)

Ummm, no that's not what I was talking about. Here I thought you were riding the wave of sarcasm, but it seems you were seriously bunching your panties about the grappling hook. Heh! Whyyyyy soooo serioussssss?


Colinhoglund


Oct 8, 2010, 5:54 PM
Post #126 of 225 (6599 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 5, 2008
Posts: 338

Re: [kachoong] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kachoong wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
"Colinhoglund wrote:
WOW, that reply made my day. Hook line and sinker. The angry ones are never right Laugh

yep, I admit it, I swallowed the bait. But like I said, I took a good rant and felt much lighter afterwards, so it wasn't a total loss. Smile

Editing to add a P.S.: I misunderstood the first poster, who was actually talking about the familiar grappling hook/cliffhanger. I don't think those items are worthless, but I can appreciate the bit about racking hooks and having them fly back into your face. The second guy, the one who posted the picture, is apparently channeling 007/Batman, and I'll stand by my comments about him... moron. WI6 to WI4, indeed. Right-O. (Of course I mean that in the nicest possible way, as far he knows.)

Ummm, no that's not what I was talking about. Here I thought you were riding the wave of sarcasm, but it seems you were seriously bunching your panties about the grappling hook. Heh! Whyyyyy soooo serioussssss?

LaughWow!!!!! This just keeps getting better!Laugh


Perihelion


Oct 8, 2010, 6:05 PM
Post #127 of 225 (6592 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [kachoong] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

kachoong wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
"Colinhoglund wrote:
WOW, that reply made my day. Hook line and sinker. The angry ones are never right Laugh

yep, I admit it, I swallowed the bait. But like I said, I took a good rant and felt much lighter afterwards, so it wasn't a total loss. Smile

Editing to add a P.S.: I misunderstood the first poster, who was actually talking about the familiar grappling hook/cliffhanger. I don't think those items are worthless, but I can appreciate the bit about racking hooks and having them fly back into your face. The second guy, the one who posted the picture, is apparently channeling 007/Batman, and I'll stand by my comments about him... moron. WI6 to WI4, indeed. Right-O. (Of course I mean that in the nicest possible way, as far he knows.)

Ummm, no that's not what I was talking about. Here I thought you were riding the wave of sarcasm, but it seems you were seriously bunching your panties about the grappling hook. Heh! Whyyyyy soooo serioussssss?

As I've said before: I do not wear panties, nor have I ever worn panties, but if called upon, panties I will wear. Big, white house panties, or small, delicate European briefs. Nothing like the feel of silky nylon on the boys. I have to draw the line at butt floss, though; that wouldn't play well with the package during a mantel or stemming move.

You're on double-secret probation now, Buckwheat.


gmggg


Oct 12, 2010, 7:35 PM
Post #128 of 225 (6505 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [cracklover] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
blueeyedclimber wrote:
If you don't believe me, go do Flying Hawaiian at Rumney without stick clipping and report back to me. Angelic

Twice. But I'm not too bright.

GO

Add two for me as well. It's an exposed start but it's not too bouldery as to be completely unsafe.


lemon_boy


Oct 12, 2010, 8:49 PM
Post #129 of 225 (6480 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 287

Re: [Colinhoglund] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.


milesenoell


Oct 12, 2010, 11:08 PM
Post #130 of 225 (6451 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [lemon_boy] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

lemon_boy wrote:
the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.

In what way are you suggesting that that is an ill advised setup?


jt512


Oct 12, 2010, 11:23 PM
Post #131 of 225 (6444 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (7 ratings)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
lemon_boy wrote:
the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.

In what way are you suggesting that that is an ill advised setup?

In the way of not providing any friction to reduce the impact force on the belayer.

Jay


milesenoell


Oct 12, 2010, 11:47 PM
Post #132 of 225 (6427 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
lemon_boy wrote:
the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.

In what way are you suggesting that that is an ill advised setup?

In the way of not providing any friction to reduce the impact force on the belayer.

Jay
I suppose, but it seems to me that using them on the rope end of draws while leading (as I believe they are intended to be used) would be to subject your belayer to much higher forces in a fall than anything you would see in a TR scenario.

Edited to add: I'm not sure how much extra force we are talking about by reducing the friction (but I suspect you do) but I'm just not all that concerned about the forces in a TR system. (I also don't generally climb with anybody who significantly outweighs me.)


(This post was edited by milesenoell on Oct 13, 2010, 12:00 AM)


jt512


Oct 13, 2010, 1:36 AM
Post #133 of 225 (6406 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
lemon_boy wrote:
the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.

In what way are you suggesting that that is an ill advised setup?

In the way of not providing any friction to reduce the impact force on the belayer.

Jay
I suppose, but it seems to me that using them on the rope end of draws while leading (as I believe they are intended to be used) would be to subject your belayer to much higher forces in a fall than anything you would see in a TR scenario.

You just made another argument for their uselessness.

In reply to:
Edited to add: I'm not sure how much extra force we are talking about by reducing the friction (but I suspect you do) but I'm just not all that concerned about the forces in a TR system. (I also don't generally climb with anybody who significantly outweighs me.)

If the revolver were frictionless it would increase the force on the belayer by about 50%. Let's say you and your partner each weigh 170 lb. Then, if you used a revolver, it would be like belaying someone who weighed 255 lb. How pleasant an experience would that be? Now, imagine that your partner weighed 200 lb. A 30-lb difference is no big deal, but with a revolver it would theoretically be like belaying someone weighing 300 lb. Is this a reason to be "concerned"? No. Is this a reason to be unhappy? Hell, yes.

Jay


climbingaggie03


Oct 13, 2010, 2:02 AM
Post #134 of 225 (6393 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: 1173

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
lemon_boy wrote:
the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.

In what way are you suggesting that that is an ill advised setup?

In the way of not providing any friction to reduce the impact force on the belayer.

Jay
I suppose, but it seems to me that using them on the rope end of draws while leading (as I believe they are intended to be used) would be to subject your belayer to much higher forces in a fall than anything you would see in a TR scenario.

Edited to add: I'm not sure how much extra force we are talking about by reducing the friction (but I suspect you do) but I'm just not all that concerned about the forces in a TR system. (I also don't generally climb with anybody who significantly outweighs me.)

You know, I never bought any, but I always thought that they would make good biners for crevasse rescue. that way you could set up a Z-drag without the hassle of pulley's. Not ideal, but lighter and simpler than pulley's. I also wonder if they'd be any good for setting up a slackline.


jt512


Oct 13, 2010, 2:54 AM
Post #135 of 225 (6382 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [climbingaggie03] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbingaggie03 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
lemon_boy wrote:
the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.

In what way are you suggesting that that is an ill advised setup?

In the way of not providing any friction to reduce the impact force on the belayer.

Jay
I suppose, but it seems to me that using them on the rope end of draws while leading (as I believe they are intended to be used) would be to subject your belayer to much higher forces in a fall than anything you would see in a TR scenario.

Edited to add: I'm not sure how much extra force we are talking about by reducing the friction (but I suspect you do) but I'm just not all that concerned about the forces in a TR system. (I also don't generally climb with anybody who significantly outweighs me.)

You know, I never bought any, but I always thought that they would make good biners for crevasse rescue. that way you could set up a Z-drag without the hassle of pulley's. Not ideal, but lighter and simpler than pulley's. I also wonder if they'd be any good for setting up a slackline.

IIRC, when the load on them exceeds a threshold, they don't rotate, and so act like a regular biner. If I'm not just imagining that, then they probably wouldn't be too helpful for tensioning a slackline, nor do they pose the lead fall concern suggested by milesenoell.

Jay


Colinhoglund


Oct 13, 2010, 3:57 AM
Post #136 of 225 (6355 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 5, 2008
Posts: 338

Re: [climbingaggie03] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climbingaggie03 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
lemon_boy wrote:
the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.

In what way are you suggesting that that is an ill advised setup?

In the way of not providing any friction to reduce the impact force on the belayer.

Jay
I suppose, but it seems to me that using them on the rope end of draws while leading (as I believe they are intended to be used) would be to subject your belayer to much higher forces in a fall than anything you would see in a TR scenario.

Edited to add: I'm not sure how much extra force we are talking about by reducing the friction (but I suspect you do) but I'm just not all that concerned about the forces in a TR system. (I also don't generally climb with anybody who significantly outweighs me.)

You know, I never bought any, but I always thought that they would make good biners for crevasse rescue. that way you could set up a Z-drag without the hassle of pulley's. Not ideal, but lighter and simpler than pulley's. I also wonder if they'd be any good for setting up a slackline.

Actually they are excellent for this purpose because they take up less space in the system. Just think, the one inch they are shorter saves you up to 6" of wasted work on a 6-1 Z drag. Not to mention they are lighter and more compact than a similarly efficient locker/pulley combo.
I usually carry one as part of my multipitch kit just in case.


Perihelion


Oct 13, 2010, 4:33 AM
Post #137 of 225 (6344 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
If the revolver were frictionless it would increase the force on the belayer by about 50%. Let's say you and your partner each weigh 170 lb. Then, if you used a revolver, it would be like belaying someone who weighed 255 lb. How pleasant an experience would that be? Now, imagine that your partner weighed 200 lb. A 30-lb difference is no big deal, but with a revolver it would theoretically be like belaying someone weighing 300 lb. Is this a reason to be "concerned"? No. Is this a reason to be unhappy? Hell, yes.

Jay



Even if we ignore friction, your examples would be valid only if we were to climb on perfectly inelastic rope. You are ignoring friction and assuming an inelastic rope, which means that your examples are far removed from reality, so much so that they are useless even as a basis for discussion.

The Revolver is not frictionless; it is roughly a 5-10% improvement over a plain biner. (Source: Climbing Self Rescue) This modest reduction of friction, combined with the dynamic properties of the rope, mean that using a Revolver for a TR setup is a non-issue for practical purposes.


milesenoell


Oct 13, 2010, 4:39 AM
Post #138 of 225 (6341 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
lemon_boy wrote:
the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.

In what way are you suggesting that that is an ill advised setup?

In the way of not providing any friction to reduce the impact force on the belayer.

Jay
I suppose, but it seems to me that using them on the rope end of draws while leading (as I believe they are intended to be used) would be to subject your belayer to much higher forces in a fall than anything you would see in a TR scenario.

You just made another argument for their uselessness.

In reply to:
Edited to add: I'm not sure how much extra force we are talking about by reducing the friction (but I suspect you do) but I'm just not all that concerned about the forces in a TR system. (I also don't generally climb with anybody who significantly outweighs me.)

If the revolver were frictionless it would increase the force on the belayer by about 50%. Let's say you and your partner each weigh 170 lb. Then, if you used a revolver, it would be like belaying someone who weighed 255 lb. How pleasant an experience would that be? Now, imagine that your partner weighed 200 lb. A 30-lb difference is no big deal, but with a revolver it would theoretically be like belaying someone weighing 300 lb. Is this a reason to be "concerned"? No. Is this a reason to be unhappy? Hell, yes.

Jay
Hey, I never made any claims to their usefulness. Personally, I never got past the fact that they are heavy, expensive and irrelevant to the climbing I do.

I was just intrigued by the post suggesting they their use was "ill advised", when a TR system just doesn't seem like the environment most likely to expose a piece of gear's weakness.


jt512


Oct 13, 2010, 4:42 AM
Post #139 of 225 (6339 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

Perihelion wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If the revolver were frictionless it would increase the force on the belayer by about 50%. Let's say you and your partner each weigh 170 lb. Then, if you used a revolver, it would be like belaying someone who weighed 255 lb. How pleasant an experience would that be? Now, imagine that your partner weighed 200 lb. A 30-lb difference is no big deal, but with a revolver it would theoretically be like belaying someone weighing 300 lb. Is this a reason to be "concerned"? No. Is this a reason to be unhappy? Hell, yes.

Jay



Even if we ignore friction, your examples would be valid only if we were to climb on perfectly inelastic rope. You are ignoring friction and assuming an inelastic rope, which means that your examples are far removed from reality, so much so that they are useless even as a basis for discussion.

The Revolver is not frictionless; it is roughly a 5-10% improvement over a plain biner. (Source: Climbing Self Rescue) This modest reduction of friction, combined with the dynamic properties of the rope, mean that using a Revolver for a TR setup is a non-issue for practical purposes.

What do you mean "even if we ignore friction"? First of all, if we ignore friction, there is nothing to discuss, since the essential difference between the Revolver and ordinary biners is that the former reduces friction. Secondly, my entire conclusion is due to considerations of friction, so we can hardly ignore it. And, no, I'm not ignoring the elasticity of the rope. My conclusions assume that the rope has the same elastic properties regardless of which biner is being used.

As to the improvement in friction being only 5-10%, I'm shocked that it is so small, and frankly, I don't believe it; and, perhaps worse, if your claim is true, I am undecided whether that makes this silly device more or less worthless!

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Oct 13, 2010, 4:50 AM)


lemon_boy


Oct 13, 2010, 2:05 PM
Post #140 of 225 (6274 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 287

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i often see people recommending them in a toprope anchor. this is retarded. have you ever seen what happens when you use a pulley for a toprope anchor? belayer=meat launch, climber = meatbomb. that aside, if you used 2 of them in a TR anchor, the direction of rotation of the 2 pulleys where they are in contact is tangentially opposite, which is obviously fucked up.

if you use them when you don't have a ton of rope drag the leader will likely take a much bigger fall, as there isn't as much friction to act as a 'braking' mechanism.

whenever i see people with revolvers on their rack i just shake my head. ultra specialized, basically useless, and if used in the wron scenario - dangerous.


hafilax


Oct 13, 2010, 2:10 PM
Post #141 of 225 (6273 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

As far as I can tell, the revolver doesn't make a very good pulley because of the tight bending radius which leads to lots of bending losses in the rope. You really have to go to a larger diameter wheel to get the benefit of using a pulley with a 180 bend in the rope. Where the revolver would make more of a difference is at smaller bending angles such as on a piece of pro.


marc801


Oct 13, 2010, 2:25 PM
Post #142 of 225 (6263 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [hafilax] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
Where the revolver would make more of a difference is at smaller bending angles such as on a piece of pro.
Exactly. That's what they're intended for - reducing rope drag at pro where direction of travel changes.


acorneau


Oct 13, 2010, 2:27 PM
Post #143 of 225 (6262 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889

Re: Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The only real info on the roller that I can find:

In reply to:
The roller itself is made of 7075 and blends smoothly into the back of the carabiner to encourage the rope to run correctly. Inside the roller is a dry tube Igus bearing which in turn is supported by a high tensile stainless sleeve over a high tensile stainless spindle. The whole assembly runs very smoothly and the sealed bearing tubes as it wears. It is also very strong, and the spindle will not deform until a force approaching 10 to 12 kN is generated.

http://www.dmmclimbing.com/...sp?pid=1&pid2=76


(This post was edited by acorneau on Oct 13, 2010, 2:31 PM)


Guran


Oct 13, 2010, 2:48 PM
Post #144 of 225 (6252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2008
Posts: 220

Re: [lemon_boy] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

lemon_boy wrote:
whenever i see people with revolvers on their rack i just shake my head. ultra specialized, basically useless, and if used in the wron scenario - dangerous.

Nah...
A revolver is a better-than-nothing pulley and as such at least better than those petzl plastic thingys.
It is also a speciality piece for meandering routes.

...and of course the true mark of a gear whore.

I have one. I take it when I might have use for a pulley, but don't expect to. Otherwise it stays in the gear box.


Perihelion


Oct 13, 2010, 4:47 PM
Post #145 of 225 (6226 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If the revolver were frictionless it would increase the force on the belayer by about 50%. ...



Even if we ignore friction, your examples would be valid only if we were to climb on perfectly inelastic rope.

The Revolver is not frictionless; it is roughly a 5-10% improvement over a plain biner. (Source: Climbing Self Rescue)

What do you mean "even if we ignore friction"? First of all, if we ignore friction, there is nothing to discuss, since the essential difference between the Revolver and ordinary biners is that the former reduces friction. Secondly, my entire conclusion is due to considerations of friction, so we can hardly ignore it. And, no, I'm not ignoring the elasticity of the rope. My conclusions assume that the rope has the same elastic properties regardless of which biner is being used.

As to the improvement in friction being only 5-10%, I'm shocked that it is so small, and frankly, I don't believe it; and, perhaps worse, if your claim is true, I am undecided whether that makes this silly device more or less worthless!

Jay

You began with the words "If the Revover were frictionless..." and then proceeded to base several apocryphal examples on that premise. Thus my comment "even if we ignore friction". Your examples read like a first semester Newtonian physics problem: "Assume a frictionless pulley and no air resistance...".

I can't see how you are allowing for the dynamic properties of a rope, because among other things, that is dependent on FF. If our hypothetical 200 lb climber falls on 30' of rope we will get different results than if the climber fell on 60' of rope. Of course the total energy is the same in both cases, but the climber and belayer will experience different peak forces.

Also, I don't expect the relationship between the 170 lb and 200 lb climbers to be linear. This is an integration problem. A statement such as "If the climber weighs X, the belayer will feel Y" is only valid for a specific set of circumstances. You can't extrapolate from that without a more info. As they said back in that first Engineering Physics class "Show your work."

As for the Revolver's efficiency: That isn't my claim, it is the claim made on pg 136 of Climbing Self-Rescue. I think it is probably valid. The efficiency of a pulley is related to the ratio of rope diameter to sheave diameter, and the Revolver has a tiny, 10mm pulley that runs on a really tiny axle and a plain bearing. DMM isn't forthcoming with efficiency rating, probably because the number is underwhelming.

Personally, I don't see the problem with using a Revolver in the MP for a TR rig. It's a non-issue, if you have $60 to throw at a couple of baubles for use on your TR rig. It seems to me that there might actually be an advantage to reducing MP friction, but if that is a goal, then the money is better spent on a beefy rescue pulley. I'd climb on that, if everything else were up to snuff. In fact, now I am curious, to the point where I might experiment the next time an opportunity presents.


Kevthecoffeeguy


Oct 13, 2010, 5:24 PM
Post #146 of 225 (6204 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2010
Posts: 149

Re: [hafilax] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
camhead wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:

Most worthless piece of gear in general: stick clip.

Sigh. Burnsie, you don't know what you're talking about. I have a regularly use a stickclip. And I don't think we need to debate about my trad/soloing/r/x/headspace abilities, either, so don't even go there.

then why use it?
Why place gear?
Cause its a long way down from up here...


jt512


Oct 14, 2010, 4:40 AM
Post #147 of 225 (6157 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

Perihelion wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Perihelion wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If the revolver were frictionless it would increase the force on the belayer by about 50%. ...



Even if we ignore friction, your examples would be valid only if we were to climb on perfectly inelastic rope.

The Revolver is not frictionless; it is roughly a 5-10% improvement over a plain biner. (Source: Climbing Self Rescue)

What do you mean "even if we ignore friction"? First of all, if we ignore friction, there is nothing to discuss, since the essential difference between the Revolver and ordinary biners is that the former reduces friction. Secondly, my entire conclusion is due to considerations of friction, so we can hardly ignore it. And, no, I'm not ignoring the elasticity of the rope. My conclusions assume that the rope has the same elastic properties regardless of which biner is being used.

As to the improvement in friction being only 5-10%, I'm shocked that it is so small, and frankly, I don't believe it; and, perhaps worse, if your claim is true, I am undecided whether that makes this silly device more or less worthless!

Jay

I can't see how you are allowing for the dynamic properties of a rope, because among other things, that is dependent on FF.

I'm using the so-called Wexler, or standard, model of impact force, in which the rope is modeled as an undamped, Hooke's Law spring. Hence, the elasticity of the rope is represented by a spring constant that is not a function of the fall factor. But, regardless, your criticism is nearly irrelevant in the circumstances we are discussing—a toprope fall—which, assuming that there is no slack, is always a fall-factor-0 fall.

In reply to:
Also, I don't expect the relationship between the 170 lb and 200 lb climbers to be linear.

Under the standard model my claim is correct: for a fall-factor-0 fall, reducing the "friction factor" from the generally-assumed-to-be-correct value of 1/3 to 0 is equivalent to increasing the weight of the climber by 50%.


In reply to:
"Show your work."

The model is explained here: The Standard Model of Impact Force

In reply to:
As for the Revolver's efficiency: That isn't my claim, it is the claim made on pg 136 of Climbing Self-Rescue.

I know it is not your claim per se. However, the idea that the Revolver would only decrease the friction in a toprope setup by 5–10% seems preposterous to me. I could certainly be wrong, but my guess would be that either your source is wrong or that you've misinterpreted it.

In reply to:
Personally, I don't see the problem with using a Revolver in the MP for a TR rig.

Whether you see it or not, the problem is that it reduces the friction between the rope and the anchor, resulting in a direct increase in the impact force on the belayer. If there really is no problem using the Revolver for the master biner a toprope set up, it would only be because it really is as worthless as you claim; ie, that it only reduces friction by 5–10%. The more effective it is at doing its job, the more detrimental it is as the top-rope master point biner.

In reply to:
It's a non-issue, if you have $60 to throw at a couple of baubles for use on your TR rig. It seems to me that there might actually be an advantage to reducing MP friction, but if that is a goal, then the money is better spent on a beefy rescue pulley. I'd climb on that, if everything else were up to snuff.

You've gotten it completely backwards. If anything, you want to increase the friction in the toprope anchor. Why else do you think that so many gyms use thick pipes as their toprope anchors, and wrap the rope around them twice.

In reply to:
In fact, now I am curious, to the point where I might experiment the next time an opportunity presents.

Please do. And enjoy the ride, no matter which end of the rope you're on.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Oct 16, 2010, 4:57 AM)


jbro_135


Oct 14, 2010, 4:07 PM
Post #148 of 225 (6094 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2009
Posts: 662

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor


jt512


Oct 14, 2010, 4:17 PM
Post #149 of 225 (6090 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [jbro_135] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor

Too bad, because when you reduce the friction on the anchor, you increase the impact force on it.


spikeddem


Oct 14, 2010, 4:39 PM
Post #150 of 225 (6076 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor

Too bad, because when you reduce the friction on the anchor, you increase the impact force on it.

A belayer getting pulled off the ground doesn't produce lower peak forces?


jt512


Oct 14, 2010, 4:58 PM
Post #151 of 225 (5500 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [spikeddem] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
jt512 wrote:
jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor

Too bad, because when you reduce the friction on the anchor, you increase the impact force on it.

A belayer getting pulled off the ground doesn't produce lower peak forces?

Whether the belayer is anchored or not, reducing friction at the anchor increases the force on the belayer and decreases the force on the climber. If the climber is anchored (and the belay static), then reducing friction increases the force on the anchor because the increase in the force on the climber is greater than the reduction of force on the belayer. If the belayer is unanchored, then I'm unsure what the net effect on the anchor would be.

Jay


redlude97


Oct 14, 2010, 6:41 PM
Post #152 of 225 (5462 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2008
Posts: 990

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
jt512 wrote:
jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor

Too bad, because when you reduce the friction on the anchor, you increase the impact force on it.

A belayer getting pulled off the ground doesn't produce lower peak forces?

Whether the belayer is anchored or not, reducing friction at the anchor increases the force on the belayer and decreases the force on the climber. If the climber is anchored (and the belay static), then reducing friction increases the force on the anchor because the increase in the force on the climber is greater than the reduction of force on the belayer. If the belayer is unanchored, then I'm unsure what the net effect on the anchor would be.

Jay
Just to clarify, you don't mean unanchored but just not leaving the ground correct?


kachoong


Oct 14, 2010, 6:45 PM
Post #153 of 225 (5459 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Everyone knows pieces of gear are worthless without pics!


jt512


Oct 14, 2010, 7:54 PM
Post #154 of 225 (5423 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [redlude97] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

redlude97 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
jt512 wrote:
jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor

Too bad, because when you reduce the friction on the anchor, you increase the impact force on it.

A belayer getting pulled off the ground doesn't produce lower peak forces?

Whether the belayer is anchored or not, reducing friction at the anchor increases the force on the belayer and decreases the force on the climber. If the climber is anchored (and the belay static), then reducing friction increases the force on the anchor because the increase in the force on the climber is greater than the reduction of force on the belayer. If the belayer is unanchored, then I'm unsure what the net effect on the anchor would be.

Jay
Just to clarify, you don't mean unanchored but just not leaving the ground correct?

No, I mean anchored and unanchored, and I'm assuming, pursuant to spikeddem's question, that the force is great enough that it would pull the belayer off the ground (if he is unanchored).

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Oct 15, 2010, 2:11 AM)


chossmonkey


Oct 15, 2010, 1:40 AM
Post #155 of 225 (5384 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414

Re: [Gmburns2000] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

quoted just because it is well said, and to remind people once again that the question was, in fact, posted in the trad forum.

So why would you bring up a piece of sport climbing gear?

By your argument it should be limited to dodads and widgets.

Perhaps the most worthless piece of gear is your mother's failed diaphragm?


climbingaggie03


Oct 15, 2010, 3:15 AM
Post #156 of 225 (5362 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: 1173

Re: [chossmonkey] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

chossmonkey wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
rangerrob wrote:
I've done Flyin' Hawaiin at Rumney, and I don't remember ever owning a stick clip. It's not impossible. I agree with anti stick clip guy on this one. He values his ethic that he needs to be able to confidently climb the entire route without the aid of an artificial long arm. It's sort of arbitrary, because the bolts are more or less arbitrarily placed, so the danger is arbitrary.

I would use a stick clip if I felt I needed it, but I would admire someone much more who climbed routes that they were comfortable with on their own terms.

The whole concept of a stick clip, and sport climbing in general is kind of absurd. You are manufacturing a route with whatever degree of danger you want to have in it. If it's okay to stick clip the first bolt, why not stick clip the second, or third? Why not leave the rope hanging from all but the chains? What's the difference?

Aside from bolting on the lead, why would someone intentionally make a sport route dangerous to lead? That's what i don't get about sport climbing. When you're placing gear you are either good enough to place the gear or you're not. With a sport climb you can easily make the route safer by just adding a lower bolt, and spacing them closer together. It's a joke, a farce...something that is there for pure entertainment. Not something to REALLY push the limits of what you yourself find as acceptable risk, and how close you can push yourself to the edge while still being in control.

RR

quoted just because it is well said, and to remind people once again that the question was, in fact, posted in the trad forum.

So why would you bring up a piece of sport climbing gear?

By your argument it should be limited to dodads and widgets.

Perhaps the most worthless piece of gear is your mother's failed diaphragm?

BURN!!!!!!


Perihelion


Oct 15, 2010, 5:45 PM
Post #157 of 225 (5308 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Interesting. There are some things to think about here. I printed the pdf & will review that, however, there is an abbreviated version available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_factor. I need to work a few examples using real-world values before I comment further.

I will add one thing, in passing: Although it is mathematically possible to have FF=0, in practice, if that were true you would have no fall. FF is always > 0, even in a TR situation. It would be more accurate to say that the limit of FF approaches zero as the length of fall approaches zero. You'll never quite get to zero, though.


spikeddem


Oct 15, 2010, 5:49 PM
Post #158 of 225 (5305 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Perihelion wrote:
Interesting. There are some things to think about here. I printed the pdf & will review that, however, there is an abbreviated version available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_factor. I need to work a few examples using real-world values before I comment further.

I will add one thing, in passing: Although it is mathematically possible to have FF=0, in practice, if that were true you would have no fall. FF is always > 0, even in a TR situation. It would be more accurate to say that the limit of FF approaches zero as the length of fall approaches zero. You'll never quite get to zero, though.

IIRC, stretch is not included in calculating the FF. So, it's definitely possible to have an FF of zero. The "fall distance," as I understand it, is equal to the distance fallen before the rope is weighted.


Perihelion


Oct 15, 2010, 5:54 PM
Post #159 of 225 (5299 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [spikeddem] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
IIRC, stretch is not included in calculating the FF. So, it's definitely possible to have an FF of zero. The "fall distance," as I understand it, is equal to the distance fallen before the rope is weighted.

You are correct. My mistake. If you hang on the rope like wet laundry, you could have a FF=0.


spikeddem


Oct 15, 2010, 6:00 PM
Post #160 of 225 (5294 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Perihelion wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
IIRC, stretch is not included in calculating the FF. So, it's definitely possible to have an FF of zero. The "fall distance," as I understand it, is equal to the distance fallen before the rope is weighted.

You are correct. My mistake. If you hang on the rope like wet laundry, you could have a FF=0.

I can't tell if you're trying to be wise with that comment, but it's common to see beginners keeping each other very tight when it comes a TR belay.


milesenoell


Oct 15, 2010, 6:14 PM
Post #161 of 225 (5291 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
lemon_boy wrote:
the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.

In what way are you suggesting that that is an ill advised setup?

In the way of not providing any friction to reduce the impact force on the belayer.

Jay
I suppose, but it seems to me that using them on the rope end of draws while leading (as I believe they are intended to be used) would be to subject your belayer to much higher forces in a fall than anything you would see in a TR scenario.

You just made another argument for their uselessness.

In reply to:
Edited to add: I'm not sure how much extra force we are talking about by reducing the friction (but I suspect you do) but I'm just not all that concerned about the forces in a TR system. (I also don't generally climb with anybody who significantly outweighs me.)

If the revolver were frictionless it would increase the force on the belayer by about 50%. Let's say you and your partner each weigh 170 lb. Then, if you used a revolver, it would be like belaying someone who weighed 255 lb. How pleasant an experience would that be? Now, imagine that your partner weighed 200 lb. A 30-lb difference is no big deal, but with a revolver it would theoretically be like belaying someone weighing 300 lb. Is this a reason to be "concerned"? No. Is this a reason to be unhappy? Hell, yes.

Jay

This one cracks me up. It's basically just a direct response to a comment I made in which you supply information I was curious about and clarify your stance (indicating that we see this similarly). How did that draw 4 one star ratings?

I can understand that there are some folks out there that strongly disagree with you, but can't they at least do so in a more effective way than these ratings? Wouldn't it be more satisfying to actually point out any differences in opinion, or better yet to maybe point out where they think you are incorrect?


jt512


Oct 15, 2010, 6:47 PM
Post #162 of 225 (5276 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

Perihelion wrote:
Interesting. There are some things to think about here. I printed the pdf & will review that, however, there is an abbreviated version available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_factor.

I know. I wrote most of the Wikipedia article.

In reply to:
I need to work a few examples using real-world values before I comment further.

If you want an easy way to work with the equation(s), you can use my online impact force calculator. It reports results using two models: the standard model and another model that treats friction at the top anchor in a more accurate fashion [source].

In reply to:
I will add one thing, in passing: Although it is mathematically possible to have FF=0, in practice, if that were true you would have no fall. FF is always > 0, even in a TR situation.

No, a toprope "fall" with no slack in the rope does in fact have a fall factor of 0. Fall factor is defined to be the length of the fall divided by the length of the rope out, where fall length is defined to be the height of the climber at the beginning of the fall minus the height of the climber just before the rope begins to stretch. Therefore, for a TR "fall" with no slack in the rope, the fall factor is 0 divided by a positive number; that is, the fall factor is 0.

Zero is a perfectly valid value for fall factor in either the standard or friction-adjusted impact force models. With a fall factor of 0, both models reduce to

T_1 = 2w ,

where T_1 is the tension in the climber's side of the rope and w is the climber's weight. This implies, perhaps surprisingly, that the maximum impact force (on the climber) in such a toprope "fall" will be twice the climber's weight, and perhaps more surprisingly, it will be so for a rope of any elasticity.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Oct 17, 2010, 5:24 AM)


jt512


Oct 15, 2010, 7:04 PM
Post #163 of 225 (5257 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
lemon_boy wrote:
the dmm revolver carabiner, without a doubt. i'm always surprised when people recommend using these for a top rope anchor, or other ill advised setups.

In what way are you suggesting that that is an ill advised setup?

In the way of not providing any friction to reduce the impact force on the belayer.

Jay
I suppose, but it seems to me that using them on the rope end of draws while leading (as I believe they are intended to be used) would be to subject your belayer to much higher forces in a fall than anything you would see in a TR scenario.

You just made another argument for their uselessness.

In reply to:
Edited to add: I'm not sure how much extra force we are talking about by reducing the friction (but I suspect you do) but I'm just not all that concerned about the forces in a TR system. (I also don't generally climb with anybody who significantly outweighs me.)

If the revolver were frictionless it would increase the force on the belayer by about 50%. Let's say you and your partner each weigh 170 lb. Then, if you used a revolver, it would be like belaying someone who weighed 255 lb. How pleasant an experience would that be? Now, imagine that your partner weighed 200 lb. A 30-lb difference is no big deal, but with a revolver it would theoretically be like belaying someone weighing 300 lb. Is this a reason to be "concerned"? No. Is this a reason to be unhappy? Hell, yes.

Jay

This one cracks me up. It's basically just a direct response to a comment I made in which you supply information I was curious about and clarify your stance (indicating that we see this similarly). How did that draw 4 one star ratings?

I can understand that there are some folks out there that strongly disagree with you, but can't they at least do so in a more effective way than these ratings? Wouldn't it be more satisfying to actually point out any differences in opinion, or better yet to maybe point out where they think you are incorrect?

If they were capable of responding coherently, I'm sure they would.

Jay


lemon_boy


Oct 15, 2010, 9:12 PM
Post #164 of 225 (5218 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 287

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Perihelion, would you use just one revolver or two in your MP anchor for toproping? if you use 2, the pulleys are running in tangentially opposing directions at the location where they are in contact. kind of ruins the point of using a pulley.

that being said using a pulley in a TR setup is a bad idea. as jay pointed out - why do you think they run the toprope a couple times around the anchor bar at the gym - to get more friction. not less.

side note, that was pretty funny that jay wrote the wiki artcile. didn't know that.


Perihelion


Oct 15, 2010, 10:49 PM
Post #165 of 225 (5191 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2010
Posts: 51

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
No, a toprope "fall" with no slack in the rope does in fact have a fall factor of 0. Fall factor is defined to be the length of the fall divided by the length of the rope out, where fall length is defined to be the height of the climber at the beginning of the fall minus the height of the climber just before the rope begins to stretch. Therefore, for a TR "fall" with no slack in the rope, the fall factor is 0 divided by a positive number; that is, the fall factor is 0. Zero is a perfectly valid value for fall factor in either the standard or friction-adjusted impact force models. With a fall factor of 0, both models reduce to

T_1 = 2w ,

where T_1 is the tension in the climber's side of the rope and w is the climber's weight. This implies, perhaps surprisingly, that the maximum impact force (on the climber) in such a toprope "fall" will be twice the climber's weight, and perhaps more surprisingly, it will be so for a rope of any elasticity.

Jay

Shocked

Oh, boy. I just worked your math. It was interesting. I'll post more about this later. Heheh.

BWAHAHAHAAAA!!! Cool


notapplicable


Oct 16, 2010, 5:09 AM
Post #166 of 225 (5152 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771

Re: [Perihelion] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Back to the topic at hand.

Mad Rock Aviator Belay Device






And no, I have not used one. I did just look up "superfluous" in the dictionary though, and guess what I saw a picture of...


ptlong2


Oct 18, 2010, 12:05 AM
Post #167 of 225 (5096 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2010
Posts: 102

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
This implies, perhaps surprisingly, that the maximum impact force (on the climber) in such a toprope "fall" will be twice the climber's weight, and perhaps more surprisingly, it will be so for a rope of any elasticity.

Any linear elasticity. If the rope deviates from Hooke's Law over the range in question the force may not be twice the climber's weight.

And it may not be twice if you add in other real-world complications such as a real climber instead of a block of iron, a real belayer instead of a static belay, or friction over the top anchor.

It would be interesting to see what range of forces real toprope falls generate. Most of them are probably not fall factor zero.


jt512


Oct 18, 2010, 12:39 AM
Post #168 of 225 (5083 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [ptlong2] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

ptlong2 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
This implies, perhaps surprisingly, that the maximum impact force (on the climber) in such a toprope "fall" will be twice the climber's weight, and perhaps more surprisingly, it will be so for a rope of any elasticity.

Any linear elasticity. If the rope deviates from Hooke's Law over the range in question the force may not be twice the climber's weight.

Yes. I stated in an earlier post, the model assumes that the rope behaves according to Hooke's Law.

Jay


Partner camhead


Oct 18, 2010, 10:30 AM
Post #169 of 225 (5047 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [lemon_boy] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lemon_boy wrote:

side note, that was pretty funny that jay wrote the wiki artcile. didn't know that.

I didn't know that either, but it didn't surprise me in the least.


fresh


Oct 18, 2010, 2:02 PM
Post #170 of 225 (5011 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
ptlong2 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
This implies, perhaps surprisingly, that the maximum impact force (on the climber) in such a toprope "fall" will be twice the climber's weight, and perhaps more surprisingly, it will be so for a rope of any elasticity.

Any linear elasticity. If the rope deviates from Hooke's Law over the range in question the force may not be twice the climber's weight.

Yes. I stated in an earlier post, the model assumes that the rope behaves according to Hooke's Law.

Jay
I swear, the stars have got to go.

do you know how accurate Hooke's Law is in predicting the rope's behavior?


jt512


Oct 18, 2010, 4:40 PM
Post #171 of 225 (4984 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [fresh] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

fresh wrote:
jt512 wrote:
ptlong2 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
This implies, perhaps surprisingly, that the maximum impact force (on the climber) in such a toprope "fall" will be twice the climber's weight, and perhaps more surprisingly, it will be so for a rope of any elasticity.

Any linear elasticity. If the rope deviates from Hooke's Law over the range in question the force may not be twice the climber's weight.

Yes. I stated in an earlier post, the model assumes that the rope behaves according to Hooke's Law.

Jay
I swear, the stars have got to go.

do you know how accurate Hooke's Law is in predicting the rope's behavior?

As I understand it (which isn't that well), the main difference between a Hooke's Law spring and an actual dynamic rope is that a dynamic rope acts as a dampened spring, resulting in lower impact forces than predicted by Hooke's Law. The standard model also ignores friction between the rope and the anchors or climbing surfaces, assumes the belay is static, and that the falling body is rigid. Were it not for friction, we could probably say that Hooke's Law overstates the impact force on the climber, the belayer, and the anchor. Modeling the effects of friction throughout the system is more complex.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Oct 18, 2010, 7:39 PM)


petsfed


Oct 18, 2010, 7:16 PM
Post #172 of 225 (4946 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
As I understand it (which isn't that well), the main difference between a Hooke's Law spring and an actual dynamic rope is that a dynamic rope acts as a dampened spring, resulting in lower impact forces than predicted by Hooke's Law.

That's pretty accurate to say. For the most part, the damping comes from internal friction, Hooke's law terms directed perpendicular to the force load, and non-elastic deformation of the rope.


ptlong2


Oct 18, 2010, 7:46 PM
Post #173 of 225 (4931 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2010
Posts: 102

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Yes. I stated in an earlier post, the model assumes...

I understand that. I was just wondering what range of forces a real no-slack toprope fall would produce since the model can't be relied upon to tell us.


ptlong2


Oct 18, 2010, 7:53 PM
Post #174 of 225 (4923 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2010
Posts: 102

Re: [petsfed] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

petsfed wrote:
jt512 wrote:
As I understand it (which isn't that well), the main difference between a Hooke's Law spring and an actual dynamic rope is that a dynamic rope acts as a dampened spring, resulting in lower impact forces than predicted by Hooke's Law.

That's pretty accurate to say. For the most part, the damping comes from internal friction, Hooke's law terms directed perpendicular to the force load, and non-elastic deformation of the rope.

There is some non-linearity in climbing ropes without considering damping. Look on the ITRS website for a 2001 paper by Weber. It's mainly concerned with static ropes but there are limited data from a slow pull test on a dynamic rope. The non-linearity over the working range is obvious. Less obvious is that for smaller elongations the effect is enough to change the prediction of 2x the climber's weight for a zero FF fall by about 10-15%. It's interesting to see the effect that knots have as well.

edit: typos


(This post was edited by ptlong2 on Oct 19, 2010, 4:07 PM)


rainman0915


Oct 20, 2010, 6:26 AM
Post #175 of 225 (4825 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 11, 2008
Posts: 233

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post



talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design


spikeddem


Oct 20, 2010, 1:44 PM
Post #176 of 225 (4538 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [rainman0915] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

rainman0915 wrote:


talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

An essentially regular, non-locking, bent gate biner just got nominated as the most useless piece of climbing gear. haha.


(This post was edited by spikeddem on Oct 20, 2010, 1:44 PM)


milesenoell


Oct 20, 2010, 5:25 PM
Post #177 of 225 (4494 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [fresh] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

fresh wrote:
jt512 wrote:
ptlong2 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
This implies, perhaps surprisingly, that the maximum impact force (on the climber) in such a toprope "fall" will be twice the climber's weight, and perhaps more surprisingly, it will be so for a rope of any elasticity.

Any linear elasticity. If the rope deviates from Hooke's Law over the range in question the force may not be twice the climber's weight.

Yes. I stated in an earlier post, the model assumes that the rope behaves according to Hooke's Law.

Jay
I swear, the stars have got to go.

do you know how accurate Hooke's Law is in predicting the rope's behavior?

It's always the same: 4 one-star ratings, often attached to the most clear and helpful out of several of jt512's posts in a thread. I wonder if Jay knows who the four people are yet?


milesenoell


Oct 20, 2010, 5:30 PM
Post #178 of 225 (4489 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [rainman0915] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rainman0915 wrote:


talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

Ugly, sure. Useless though?

Edited for photo


(This post was edited by milesenoell on Oct 20, 2010, 5:30 PM)


dingus


Oct 20, 2010, 6:32 PM
Post #179 of 225 (4464 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Not me, just for the record.

DMT


milesenoell


Oct 20, 2010, 7:03 PM
Post #180 of 225 (4449 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [dingus] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
Not me, just for the record.

DMT

Hey now, don't set a precedent or there will be lots of us needing to defend ourselves in a similar fashion.


boymeetsrock


Oct 20, 2010, 7:13 PM
Post #181 of 225 (4440 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
dingus wrote:
Not me, just for the record.

DMT

Hey now, don't set a precedent or there will be lots of us needing to defend ourselves in a similar fashion.

Not that this is the place for it, but I argued for disclosure of star rating before and will again. And its not me either. Just sayin'.


dingus


Oct 20, 2010, 7:20 PM
Post #182 of 225 (4432 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [boymeetsrock] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

boymeetsrock wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
dingus wrote:
Not me, just for the record.

DMT

Hey now, don't set a precedent or there will be lots of us needing to defend ourselves in a similar fashion.

Not that this is the place for it, but I argued for disclosure of star rating before and will again. And its not me either. Just sayin'.

Someone will just steal them anyway.

DMT


milesenoell


Oct 20, 2010, 7:22 PM
Post #183 of 225 (4431 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [boymeetsrock] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

boymeetsrock wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
dingus wrote:
Not me, just for the record.

DMT

Hey now, don't set a precedent or there will be lots of us needing to defend ourselves in a similar fashion.

Not that this is the place for it, but I argued for disclosure of star rating before and will again. And its not me either. Just sayin'.

While I am no fan of the stars, I was actually just joking around with Dingus about being ugly and useless.


milesenoell


Oct 20, 2010, 7:24 PM
Post #184 of 225 (4428 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

..but maybe I was mistaken about what he was referring to.


dingus


Oct 20, 2010, 7:32 PM
Post #185 of 225 (4421 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
boymeetsrock wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
dingus wrote:
Not me, just for the record.

DMT

Hey now, don't set a precedent or there will be lots of us needing to defend ourselves in a similar fashion.

Not that this is the place for it, but I argued for disclosure of star rating before and will again. And its not me either. Just sayin'.

While I am no fan of the stars, I was actually just joking around with Dingus about being ugly and useless.

Don't be so hard on yourself. Even a hippo's momma thinks its pretty.

And you can craft a cogent sentence, so you're not ENTIRELY useless!

DMT


milesenoell


Oct 20, 2010, 7:36 PM
Post #186 of 225 (4416 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [boymeetsrock] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

boymeetsrock wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
dingus wrote:
Not me, just for the record.

DMT

Hey now, don't set a precedent or there will be lots of us needing to defend ourselves in a similar fashion.

Not that this is the place for it, but I argued for disclosure of star rating before and will again. And its not me either. Just sayin'.

What I'd like to see is some other tag that could be applied to posts worth checking out, so that the best bits of info would stand out over much longer periods of time. That way the site would improve naturally over time. When 50 people give some post a thumbs up or whatever you could see that and go check out a post even if it's 5 years old.


jt512


Oct 20, 2010, 7:59 PM
Post #187 of 225 (4397 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
boymeetsrock wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
dingus wrote:
Not me, just for the record.

DMT

Hey now, don't set a precedent or there will be lots of us needing to defend ourselves in a similar fashion.

Not that this is the place for it, but I argued for disclosure of star rating before and will again. And its not me either. Just sayin'.

What I'd like to see is some other tag that could be applied to posts worth checking out, so that the best bits of info would stand out over much longer periods of time. That way the site would improve naturally over time. When 50 people give some post a thumbs up or whatever you could see that and go check out a post even if it's 5 years old.

That's exactly what the star ratings were supposed to be. J_ung, when he was in charge, planned to allow users to search for highly rated posts. However, whether you use use a 5-star system, or just a thumbs-up tag to rate posts, it is now clear that the results won't be reliable if users are not held publicly accountable for their votes.

Jay


boymeetsrock


Oct 20, 2010, 8:00 PM
Post #188 of 225 (4396 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

oopps. Blush I'm always so literal... Damn it, damn it, damn it!


rainman0915


Oct 20, 2010, 8:02 PM
Post #189 of 225 (4391 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 11, 2008
Posts: 233

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:
[image]https://www.alpenglowgear.com/gear/images/BEGA.jpg[/image]

talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

Ugly, sure. Useless though?

Edited for photo

well i guess it doesn't fit perfectly in the "useless" category, but who on earth would pay 12.95 for one of these? over a more usable and affordable bent gate or wire gate of course.


(This post was edited by rainman0915 on Oct 20, 2010, 8:07 PM)


hafilax


Oct 20, 2010, 8:05 PM
Post #190 of 225 (4386 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I think a system where one star is worth more than a no stars might clear that up. Some seem to think that 1 star=crap but I end up reading 1 star posts because they usually have something to add even if it's just purely for entertainment.


jt512


Oct 20, 2010, 8:06 PM
Post #191 of 225 (4385 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [milesenoell] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:


talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

Ugly, sure. Useless though?

Edited for photo

I wonder how far the extreme bar stock trend for carabiners is going to go. After about 1 mm of wear, the basket of that carabiner looks like it's going to turn into a knife blade. See the thread about the rope that was severed by a sharp fixed draw, for details.

Jay


moose_droppings


Oct 20, 2010, 8:13 PM
Post #192 of 225 (4378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [boymeetsrock] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

boymeetsrock wrote:
Not that this is the place for it, but I argued for disclosure of star rating before and will again. And its not me either. Just sayin'.

Me too.

Just like the prior way of rating, any monkey can stand in the shadows and toss poop.


dingus


Oct 20, 2010, 8:28 PM
Post #193 of 225 (4365 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [moose_droppings] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Ive seen several climbing sites with the equivalent of star ratings. Public accountability means nothing, it still becomes a popularity contest.

And the sort of public accountability jt512 has in mind, the one where HE is in charge of accountability, will NEVER EVER COME TO PASS, not here, not anywhere free red blooded climbers inhabit. We can't stand that sort of in-house tyranny.

Hahahahahahahahaha!

DMT


redlude97


Oct 20, 2010, 10:17 PM
Post #194 of 225 (4324 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2008
Posts: 990

Re: [rainman0915] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

rainman0915 wrote:


talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design
Just as strong as a petzl spirit(10kn open gate) and 16% lighter doesn't seem worthless to me.


Partner camhead


Oct 21, 2010, 1:41 PM
Post #195 of 225 (4262 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [spikeddem] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:


talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

An essentially regular, non-locking, bent gate biner just got nominated as the most useless piece of climbing gear. haha.

Actually, wait until that thing gets worn down one-third of the way by the rope. You'll find that it is not quite so "regular." I pulled a half dozen of these off of some routes at the Red a few weeks back. The cross section of the biner wears down to a knife edge way easier than normal biners.

(edited to fix image tag, and to say that JT GU'd me.)


(This post was edited by camhead on Oct 21, 2010, 1:47 PM)


spikeddem


Oct 21, 2010, 2:01 PM
Post #196 of 225 (4253 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [camhead] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:
[image]https://www.alpenglowgear.com/gear/images/BEGA.jpg[/image]

talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

An essentially regular, non-locking, bent gate biner just got nominated as the most useless piece of climbing gear. haha.

Actually, wait until that thing gets worn down one-third of the way by the rope. You'll find that it is not quite so "regular." I pulled a half dozen of these off of some routes at the Red a few weeks back. The cross section of the biner wears down to a knife edge way easier than normal biners.

(edited to fix image tag, and to say that JT GU'd me.)

A good point that had not crossed my mind. Here in MN, it's easy to forget that fixed gear exists in other places Laugh


Partner camhead


Oct 21, 2010, 2:06 PM
Post #197 of 225 (4249 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [spikeddem] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:
[image]https://www.alpenglowgear.com/gear/images/BEGA.jpg[/image]

talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

An essentially regular, non-locking, bent gate biner just got nominated as the most useless piece of climbing gear. haha.

Actually, wait until that thing gets worn down one-third of the way by the rope. You'll find that it is not quite so "regular." I pulled a half dozen of these off of some routes at the Red a few weeks back. The cross section of the biner wears down to a knife edge way easier than normal biners.

(edited to fix image tag, and to say that JT GU'd me.)

A good point that had not crossed my mind. Here in MN, it's easy to forget that fixed gear exists in other places Laugh

Yeah, those style of biners are just the worst offenders for wearing down to a sharp edge, but they are not the only ones. Bottom line: if you are going to leave fixed draws on a route that will become popular, steel, with a simple round cross-section are the best option.


acorneau


Oct 21, 2010, 2:23 PM
Post #198 of 225 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889

Re: [camhead] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
... Bottom line: if you are going to leave fixed draws on a route that will become popular, steel, with a simple round cross-section are the best option.


FYI: CAMP steel bent-gate biners with capture pin are on sale here: http://www.sierratradingpost.com/...-Safe-Carabiner.html

Price drops to less than $6 a piece if you use a coupon.

Carry on!


csproul


Oct 21, 2010, 2:24 PM
Post #199 of 225 (4239 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [camhead] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:
[image]https://www.alpenglowgear.com/gear/images/BEGA.jpg[/image]

talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

An essentially regular, non-locking, bent gate biner just got nominated as the most useless piece of climbing gear. haha.

Actually, wait until that thing gets worn down one-third of the way by the rope. You'll find that it is not quite so "regular." I pulled a half dozen of these off of some routes at the Red a few weeks back. The cross section of the biner wears down to a knife edge way easier than normal biners.

(edited to fix image tag, and to say that JT GU'd me.)
Someone left fixed draws with $13 biners on them!


moose_droppings


Oct 21, 2010, 4:12 PM
Post #200 of 225 (4216 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [acorneau] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Just to add to your post;

Gear Express has 3 different Liberty Mountain steel biners for under $10.


jt512


Oct 21, 2010, 4:25 PM
Post #201 of 225 (5863 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [camhead] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:


talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

An essentially regular, non-locking, bent gate biner just got nominated as the most useless piece of climbing gear. haha.

Actually, wait until that thing gets worn down one-third of the way by the rope. You'll find that it is not quite so "regular." I pulled a half dozen of these off of some routes at the Red a few weeks back. The cross section of the biner wears down to a knife edge way easier than normal biners.

(edited to fix image tag, and to say that JT GU'd me.)

A good point that had not crossed my mind. Here in MN, it's easy to forget that fixed gear exists in other places Laugh

Yeah, those style of biners are just the worst offenders for wearing down to a sharp edge, but they are not the only ones. Bottom line: if you are going to leave fixed draws on a route that will become popular, steel, with a simple round cross-section are the best option.

I'm not convinced that this is strictly a fixed draw issue. A basket of a draw's rope-end carabiner gets worn with ordinary use, and conventional wisdom says that the groove that gets formed remains rounded enough not to pose a danger; but with radical T-bar stock, like this biner has, I wonder if that is true.

Jay


caughtinside


Oct 21, 2010, 4:33 PM
Post #202 of 225 (5854 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:


talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

An essentially regular, non-locking, bent gate biner just got nominated as the most useless piece of climbing gear. haha.

Actually, wait until that thing gets worn down one-third of the way by the rope. You'll find that it is not quite so "regular." I pulled a half dozen of these off of some routes at the Red a few weeks back. The cross section of the biner wears down to a knife edge way easier than normal biners.

(edited to fix image tag, and to say that JT GU'd me.)

A good point that had not crossed my mind. Here in MN, it's easy to forget that fixed gear exists in other places Laugh

Yeah, those style of biners are just the worst offenders for wearing down to a sharp edge, but they are not the only ones. Bottom line: if you are going to leave fixed draws on a route that will become popular, steel, with a simple round cross-section are the best option.

I'm not convinced that this is strictly a fixed draw issue. A basket of a draw's rope-end carabiner gets worn with ordinary use, and conventional wisdom says that the groove that gets formed remains rounded enough not to pose a danger; but with radical T-bar stock, like this biner has, I wonder if that is true.

Jay

I used a few of those biners that a friend had on his cams. They're great biners.

I also have the sightly larger locking version for my current belay biner on the ATC xp.

It's very light and pretty strong, but after just a handful of rappels, it has noticeably worn down on both sides. It won't be too long before the grooves get deeper and the edges sharper. I've only been using it since June, and I don't rappel that much.

Pricey, disposable biners. It would be worth having one for back country routes, but they just wear down too fast.

Incidentally, I think the baskets of my biners are wearing down at different rates (can't prove this at all) and was wondering what the different characteristics of different aluminum stock is. I have some wild country biners that are disappearing before my eyes, where as my neutrinos have been going strong for several years now.


caughtinside


Oct 21, 2010, 4:35 PM
Post #203 of 225 (5852 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [caughtinside] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

caughtinside wrote:
jt512 wrote:
camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:
[image]https://www.alpenglowgear.com/gear/images/BEGA.jpg[/image]

talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

An essentially regular, non-locking, bent gate biner just got nominated as the most useless piece of climbing gear. haha.

Actually, wait until that thing gets worn down one-third of the way by the rope. You'll find that it is not quite so "regular." I pulled a half dozen of these off of some routes at the Red a few weeks back. The cross section of the biner wears down to a knife edge way easier than normal biners.

(edited to fix image tag, and to say that JT GU'd me.)

A good point that had not crossed my mind. Here in MN, it's easy to forget that fixed gear exists in other places Laugh

Yeah, those style of biners are just the worst offenders for wearing down to a sharp edge, but they are not the only ones. Bottom line: if you are going to leave fixed draws on a route that will become popular, steel, with a simple round cross-section are the best option.

I'm not convinced that this is strictly a fixed draw issue. A basket of a draw's rope-end carabiner gets worn with ordinary use, and conventional wisdom says that the groove that gets formed remains rounded enough not to pose a danger; but with radical T-bar stock, like this biner has, I wonder if that is true.

Jay

I used a few of those biners that a friend had on his cams. They're great biners.

I also have the sightly larger locking version for my current belay biner on the ATC xp.

It's very light and pretty strong, but after just a handful of rappels, it has noticeably worn down on both sides. It won't be too long before the grooves get deeper and the edges sharper. I've only been using it since June, and I don't rappel that much.

Pricey, disposable biners. It would be worth having one for back country routes, but they just wear down too fast.

Incidentally, I think the baskets of my biners are wearing down at different rates (can't prove this at all) and was wondering what the different characteristics of different aluminum stock is. I have some wild country biners that are disappearing before my eyes, where as my neutrinos have been going strong for several years now.


this is the locker I'm talking about. bionic mytholito.


veritascs


Oct 21, 2010, 4:54 PM
Post #204 of 225 (5843 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 30, 2009
Posts: 10

Re: [jbro_135] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor
Who uses a single "sketchy" nut to TR?

If you're building an anchor for TR, it should be 3+ pieces, at least 2 bomber, all equalized.


acorneau


Oct 21, 2010, 5:02 PM
Post #205 of 225 (5838 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889

Re: [veritascs] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

veritascs wrote:
jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor
Who uses a single "sketchy" nut to TR?

If you're building an anchor for TR, it should be 3+ pieces, at least 2 bomber, all equalized.




dr_feelgood


Oct 21, 2010, 5:18 PM
Post #206 of 225 (5827 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [acorneau] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

acorneau wrote:
veritascs wrote:
jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor
Who uses a single "sketchy" nut to TR?

If you're building an anchor for TR, it should be 3+ pieces, at least 2 bomber, all equalized.




spikeddem


Oct 21, 2010, 5:19 PM
Post #207 of 225 (5826 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [acorneau] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

acorneau wrote:
veritascs wrote:
jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor
Who uses a single "sketchy" nut to TR?

If you're building an anchor for TR, it should be 3+ pieces, at least 2 bomber, all equalized.


+1


Partner camhead


Oct 21, 2010, 5:25 PM
Post #208 of 225 (5819 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:
[image]https://www.alpenglowgear.com/gear/images/BEGA.jpg[/image]

talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

An essentially regular, non-locking, bent gate biner just got nominated as the most useless piece of climbing gear. haha.

Actually, wait until that thing gets worn down one-third of the way by the rope. You'll find that it is not quite so "regular." I pulled a half dozen of these off of some routes at the Red a few weeks back. The cross section of the biner wears down to a knife edge way easier than normal biners.

(edited to fix image tag, and to say that JT GU'd me.)

A good point that had not crossed my mind. Here in MN, it's easy to forget that fixed gear exists in other places Laugh

Yeah, those style of biners are just the worst offenders for wearing down to a sharp edge, but they are not the only ones. Bottom line: if you are going to leave fixed draws on a route that will become popular, steel, with a simple round cross-section are the best option.

I'm not convinced that this is strictly a fixed draw issue. A basket of a draw's rope-end carabiner gets worn with ordinary use, and conventional wisdom says that the groove that gets formed remains rounded enough not to pose a danger; but with radical T-bar stock, like this biner has, I wonder if that is true.

Jay

Yeah, I suppose that the reason I was emphasizing this as a fixed draw issue was just my recent experience removing a lot of them. Furthermore, these are still a fairly new arrival in climbing gear; obviously fixed draws are going to wear much more quickly than most peoples' personal draws. It will be interesting to see how people are liking these things on their personal racks after 4-6 years of use.


jt512


Oct 21, 2010, 5:41 PM
Post #209 of 225 (5809 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [camhead] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
jt512 wrote:
camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
camhead wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
rainman0915 wrote:
[image]https://www.alpenglowgear.com/gear/images/BEGA.jpg[/image]

talk about unnecessarily over complicating a design

An essentially regular, non-locking, bent gate biner just got nominated as the most useless piece of climbing gear. haha.

Actually, wait until that thing gets worn down one-third of the way by the rope. You'll find that it is not quite so "regular." I pulled a half dozen of these off of some routes at the Red a few weeks back. The cross section of the biner wears down to a knife edge way easier than normal biners.

(edited to fix image tag, and to say that JT GU'd me.)

A good point that had not crossed my mind. Here in MN, it's easy to forget that fixed gear exists in other places Laugh

Yeah, those style of biners are just the worst offenders for wearing down to a sharp edge, but they are not the only ones. Bottom line: if you are going to leave fixed draws on a route that will become popular, steel, with a simple round cross-section are the best option.

I'm not convinced that this is strictly a fixed draw issue. A basket of a draw's rope-end carabiner gets worn with ordinary use, and conventional wisdom says that the groove that gets formed remains rounded enough not to pose a danger; but with radical T-bar stock, like this biner has, I wonder if that is true.

Jay

Yeah, I suppose that the reason I was emphasizing this as a fixed draw issue was just my recent experience removing a lot of them. Furthermore, these are still a fairly new arrival in climbing gear; obviously fixed draws are going to wear much more quickly than most peoples' personal draws. It will be interesting to see how people are liking these things on their personal racks after 4-6 years of use.

Or after a single season. I have biners that have gotten significant grooves in their first year.

Jay


airscape


Oct 22, 2010, 8:40 AM
Post #210 of 225 (5765 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
boymeetsrock wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
dingus wrote:
Not me, just for the record.

DMT

Hey now, don't set a precedent or there will be lots of us needing to defend ourselves in a similar fashion.

Not that this is the place for it, but I argued for disclosure of star rating before and will again. And its not me either. Just sayin'.

What I'd like to see is some other tag that could be applied to posts worth checking out, so that the best bits of info would stand out over much longer periods of time. That way the site would improve naturally over time. When 50 people give some post a thumbs up or whatever you could see that and go check out a post even if it's 5 years old.

That's exactly what the star ratings were supposed to be. J_ung, when he was in charge, planned to allow users to search for highly rated posts. However, whether you use use a 5-star system, or just a thumbs-up tag to rate posts, it is now clear that the results won't be reliable if users are not held publicly accountable for their votes.

Jay

it doesn't matter who rated it, if it's rated it's worth reading.

Thats all that counts.


airscape


Oct 22, 2010, 1:16 PM
Post #211 of 225 (5727 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240

Re: [chossmonkey] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

chossmonkey wrote:

Perhaps the most worthless piece of gear is your mother's failed diaphragm?

LaughLaugh


petsfed


Oct 22, 2010, 2:27 PM
Post #212 of 225 (5708 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599

Re: [airscape] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

airscape wrote:
jt512 wrote:
That's exactly what the star ratings were supposed to be. J_ung, when he was in charge, planned to allow users to search for highly rated posts. However, whether you use use a 5-star system, or just a thumbs-up tag to rate posts, it is now clear that the results won't be reliable if users are not held publicly accountable for their votes.

Jay

it doesn't matter who rated it, if it's rated it's worth reading.

Thats all that counts.

The issue is equivalent to photobombing. Downrating another user because you have an axe to grind, rather than because their content is shitty, is specifically contrary to the point, as an inexperienced user will only get the information that the growing cadre of photobombers deem "good", and the experienced user will know to simply wade through all the real garbage to get at the useful information. I could think of several solutions for this, but I'm not smart enough to really anticipate how those who use such things as truncheons might use my solutions.


ianmeister89


Oct 22, 2010, 5:00 PM
Post #213 of 225 (5680 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: 140

Re: [caughtinside] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I keep mine forever attached to my grigri. I used to use it with an atc, but I saw the biner wearing within about 3 months. ...So I dedicated it to a more wear-free job.

-Ian


spikeddem


Oct 22, 2010, 5:03 PM
Post #214 of 225 (5678 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [ianmeister89] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ianmeister89 wrote:
I keep mine forever attached to my grigri. I used to use it with an atc, but I saw the biner wearing within about 3 months. ...So I dedicated it to a more wear-free job.

-Ian

I can't really think of a more wear-free job for a locking biner than gri-gri duty, except I guess like going in direct to an anchor.


ianmeister89


Oct 22, 2010, 5:12 PM
Post #215 of 225 (5668 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: 140

Re: [spikeddem] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:

I can't really think of a more wear-free job for a locking biner than gri-gri duty, except I guess like going in direct to an anchor.

very true. I actually use it for that whenever I do multipitch trad.

-Ian


Partner cracklover


Oct 27, 2010, 4:33 PM
Post #216 of 225 (5590 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor

Too bad, because when you reduce the friction on the anchor, you increase the impact force on it.

Are you sure? There are two competing effects: 1 - Less of the energy of the fall converted to heat over the anchor biner (effectively increasing the fall factor); and 2 - More effective rope to "absorb" the energy, due to the rope on the belayer-side feeling more force (effectively reducing the fall-factor).

In short, are you sure that the second factor doesn't reduce the force on the anchor more than the first increases it?

All that being said - it sounds like a good nomination to me. I've never used a revolver, and have never even remotely wanted one. Though I can see how folks who refuse to use doubles in places like the Gunks where they're so useful might want a revolver or two.

GO


sungam


Oct 27, 2010, 5:46 PM
Post #217 of 225 (5565 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [cracklover] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I have a friend who has a few revolvers, he uses them on routes with big traverses and stuff. We were climbing on his rack and I tried it out. Not much of a noticable difference, really. Maybe that's cuz the rope wasn't free hanging (ie it had slabby bits) so maybe in some cases they are rad?


marc801


Oct 27, 2010, 6:44 PM
Post #218 of 225 (5552 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [veritascs] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

veritascs wrote:
jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor
Who uses a single "sketchy" nut to TR?

If you're building an anchor for TR, it should be 3+ pieces, at least 2 bomber, all equalized.
And if you're posting on a net forum, you should really know the meaning of hyperbole, parody, satire, and troll.


jt512


Oct 27, 2010, 6:59 PM
Post #219 of 225 (5545 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [cracklover] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
jt512 wrote:
jbro_135 wrote:
i like to use revolvers to reduce impact force when i'm top-roping on a sketchy single-micronut anchor

Too bad, because when you reduce the friction on the anchor, you increase the impact force on it.

Are you sure? There are two competing effects: 1 - Less of the energy of the fall converted to heat over the anchor biner (effectively increasing the fall factor); and 2 - More effective rope to "absorb" the energy, due to the rope on the belayer-side feeling more force (effectively reducing the fall-factor).

Under the Hooke's Law model, yes, I'm sure. But the model assumes a static belay. If the belayer is unanchored, I'm unsure, as I wrote in a subsequent post.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Oct 27, 2010, 7:19 PM)


ptlong2


Oct 28, 2010, 7:42 PM
Post #220 of 225 (5456 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2010
Posts: 102

Re: [jt512] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
If the belayer is unanchored, I'm unsure, as I wrote in a subsequent post.

I'm pretty sure it will depend on the mass of the "belayer", that is the steel block that you've firmly affixed your massless, perfectly Hookian, undamped rope to.

Consider the extremes. If the belayer is infinately heavy then it's the same as if the belayer is anchored: decreasing the friction increases the force. On the other hand, if the belayer is an infinitesimal mass, the climber will fall at close to g and the belayer will take off like a rocket. The belayer side tension required for this will be largely independent of the climber mass. By decreasing friction you decrease the pulley effect since the determining tension is on the belayer side.

So if you use a pulley with a big belayer the force will increase whereas with a pint sized belayer a pulley will lower the force (and the belayer will go flying). Where exactly the cross over is I can't say.

At least that's my hand waving argument.


edit: typo


(This post was edited by ptlong2 on Oct 28, 2010, 7:49 PM)


cruxstacean


Oct 29, 2010, 1:45 AM
Post #221 of 225 (5406 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 5, 2010
Posts: 174

Re: [ptlong2] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

ptlong2 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If the belayer is unanchored, I'm unsure, as I wrote in a subsequent post.

I'm pretty sure it will depend on the mass of the "belayer", that is the steel block that you've firmly affixed your massless, perfectly Hookian, undamped rope to.

Consider the extremes. If the belayer is infinately heavy then it's the same as if the belayer is anchored: decreasing the friction increases the force. On the other hand, if the belayer is an infinitesimal mass, the climber will fall at close to g and the belayer will take off like a rocket. The belayer side tension required for this will be largely independent of the climber mass. By decreasing friction you decrease the pulley effect since the determining tension is on the belayer side.

So if you use a pulley with a big belayer the force will increase whereas with a pint sized belayer a pulley will lower the force (and the belayer will go flying). Where exactly the cross over is I can't say.

At least that's my hand waving argument.


edit: typo

Anorexic belayers are all the rage these days Smile


redlude97


Oct 29, 2010, 2:31 AM
Post #222 of 225 (5394 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2008
Posts: 990

Re: [ptlong2] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ptlong2 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If the belayer is unanchored, I'm unsure, as I wrote in a subsequent post.

I'm pretty sure it will depend on the mass of the "belayer", that is the steel block that you've firmly affixed your massless, perfectly Hookian, undamped rope to.

Consider the extremes. If the belayer is infinately heavy then it's the same as if the belayer is anchored: decreasing the friction increases the force. On the other hand, if the belayer is an infinitesimal mass, the climber will fall at close to g and the belayer will take off like a rocket. The belayer side tension required for this will be largely independent of the climber mass. By decreasing friction you decrease the pulley effect since the determining tension is on the belayer side.

So if you use a pulley with a big belayer the force will increase whereas with a pint sized belayer a pulley will lower the force (and the belayer will go flying). Where exactly the cross over is I can't say.

At least that's my hand waving argument.


edit: typo
Oh noes JT is going to get you now Crazy


jjones16


May 22, 2011, 6:27 AM
Post #223 of 225 (5042 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 2, 2010
Posts: 80

Re: [devkrev] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The ultra retarded wrap-around Petzl rope protector that I bought when I was still a strictly top roping noob. Never used it. Not once.


Kstenson


May 22, 2011, 1:20 PM
Post #224 of 225 (5028 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 7, 2011
Posts: 78

Re: [jjones16] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Possibly because they are useless in a top-rope application?

Static rope protectors which remain fixed over a specific part of the rope are designed for protecting rappels, not top ropes.


(This post was edited by Kstenson on May 22, 2011, 1:21 PM)


jjones16


May 23, 2011, 12:44 AM
Post #225 of 225 (4983 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 2, 2010
Posts: 80

Re: [Kstenson] Most Worthless Piece of Gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Kstenson wrote:
Possibly because they are useless in a top-rope application?

Static rope protectors which remain fixed over a specific part of the rope are designed for protecting rappels, not top ropes.

Not always the case, in either case. First, if you're setting up a retrievable rappel on a doubled rope, or two ropes tied to get a longer rap, it does little good to have protector wrapped around them; or even one of them. Second, they can be utilized in a top roping situation when you have to anchor above a ledge and then extend the anchor over the edge, thus necessitating the protector, and NOT rendering it useless. In fact, it's quite common. I simply meant to convey that I have never used it in that application as I usually have a pack, or a jacket or something that offers more padding and is more convenient; which makes it useless to me. But thank you for your thought-provoking and somewhat condescending reply. Clearly you know more about rope protectors than I do.


Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Trad Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook