Why is it when I deal with Mods/Admins here, all logic is irrelevant?

Why is it when I deal with Mods/Admins here, all logic is irrelevant?

Are there any quotas or standards the admins/mods must meet regarding irrational behavior?

From my experience, they must be held to a pretty high standard of stupidity...

try this: stop being a whiny little b-tch.

Biatch It's biatch dude. Be-ah-ch. Get with the now.

...it would be useful for you to cite the current problem with the admin/mods...

...it would be useful for you to cite the current problem with the admin/mods...

Being singled out by the Mods/Admins because of my public accountability thread, and the conspiracy between the moderators and the administrators to harass, and also to moderate every thread I post thenceforth.

believe it or not, we actually have very lively discussions about these things.

Don't push them, because they rule and you do not

I don't care much for the hassel, but things need to change. If you want to know the problems with this site, it's simple - look back over my public accountability thread. Change is good and natural. But in the end, nothing will likely change - the people 'running the show' here are too deeply 'intrenched' and fear they'll lose too much by changing anything because of their own bizarre and twisted perspectives.

Change is good and natural, but in the end, nothing will likely change - because the people 'running the show' here are too deeply 'intrenched' and fear they'll lose too much by changing anything because of their own bizarre and twisted perspectives.

To be a mod, you need to have committed at least one federal crime on the internet(e.g. rrradam), prompted more than one person to contemplate murder(e.g. jt512, or any other rec.climbing subhuman), unethically pumped the rating of your climbing photographs(e.g. broganadams and his progeny), or generally be a poster who distinguishes himself by having a high insult to knowledge ratio. Lack of logic, wasting other mod's time, coming up with useless ideas like the route database, and putting a large number of emoticons in your posts are all relevant in determining qualified candidates.

To be a mod, you need to have committed at least one federal crime on the internet(e.g. rrradam), prompted more than one person to contemplate murder(e.g. jt512, or any other rec.climbing subhuman), unethically pumped the rating of your climbing photographs(e.g. broganadams and his progeny), or generally be a poster who distinguishes himself by having a high insult to knowledge ratio. Lack of logic, wasting other mod's time, coming up with useless ideas like the route database, and putting a large number of emoticons in your posts are all relevant in determining qualified candidates.

This thread has become counterproductive, as I predicted it would...

Forget it, this site is hopeless. Lock it, delete it, modify it, tarpit me, I really no longer care... use this website for what it's worth despite it's indiscretions, but don't bother changing it... for you won't be heard.

two admins and at least one mod have tried to get more information from you about your grievance, but you wont respond to pm's...

And just who might YOU be, with your recent born-on date and vast knowledge of RC.com history??

Oh yes, put pressure on me from someone I respect to get me to change the title. By the way, I thought PMs were private, why are they being discussed amongst moderators and admins again?

And his qualifications for mod are incorrect, or at least incomplete. Failing the employment application at REI is also acceptable credential.

-Jay

Why would I reply to anyone I don't trust, which will in all probability turn abusive, as it has before?

Furthermore, do you believe if RC.com was as perfect as you assert it to be there would be threads like these?

And everyone who posts one similar is blasted off as a 'drama queen', 'problem user' or 'conspiracy theorist'...

:lol: :lol:


Hmmm...I passed that. Must've slipped through the cracks...

Does failing the REI credit card application count?? :P

Please address the double standard and felonious behavior

and maybe reread my post too

you're addressing issues that aren't even in my post...

please provide specific examples of these...

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...iewtopic.php?t=17614

Many users have been banned for much less.

why not just walk away?

will someone please post some naked butt pics already?

Also, since there is supposedly huge commotion over the title, please make any requests here for title changes and with recommendations as to what the title should be changed to here. Submissions will need to have the same ring and attention-getting title as the original...

Amber, it's the double standard, that is just an example which I am comparing to a relatively recent event.

will somebody just ban this whiny little fruitcake please?

I have stated my point, why are some people banned for certain allegations, yet some who have abused their power far worse are promoted/left alone?

...but I passionately disagree he should have ever been banned. Sending people out the backdoor and pushing them under the rug is furthering the problem, not fixing it. So, how can the PTPP case and the rrradam case be compared? You won't state the evidence in the PTPP case, just sweep it under the rug.

So please cite said evidence in each case and let the community judge for themselves.

Zing!

In a last gasp effort to keep the troll alive, DS plays the Pete card! We're good for at least 5 more pages! Hurrah!

You will NEVER know the details. It is not now, nor will it ever be any of your business what happened with Pete or Adam for that matter. Those matters are handled privately for a reason. It doesn't concern you, move on!

So please cite said evidence in each case and let the community judge for themselves. It's clear, as Dingus put it, where do we get off?

however, i would like to point out that you've presented a double standard of your own - the same person who mistrusts the system about private messaging is asking that system to publicly reveal the names/identities and details of incredibly personal situations.

This is why there are F.O.I. Acts, because it was decided long ago hiding facts isn't the best way.

however, i would like to point out that you've presented a double standard of your own - the same person who mistrusts the system about private messaging is asking that system to publicly reveal the names/identities and details of incredibly personal situations.

To be a mod, you need to have committed at least one federal crime on the internet(e.g. rrradam), prompted more than one person to contemplate murder(e.g. jt512, or any other rec.climbing subhuman), unethically pumped the rating of your climbing photographs(e.g. broganadams and his progeny), or generally be a poster who distinguishes himself by having a high insult to knowledge ratio. Lack of logic, wasting other mod's time, coming up with useless ideas like the route database, and putting a large number of emoticons in your posts are all relevant in determining qualified candidates.

Gather around your computer screens and watch the next installment of "I am a delusional, self important, self proclaimed internet martyr"

Ok then, it's settled. RC.com's official position is they would rather allow users to make a descision based upon incomplete facts than the truth in it's entirety.

I've had enough fun watching the people that fear that have much to lose, find all sorts of creative ways to argue and wiggle and squirm...

Ok then, it's settled. RC.com's official position is they would rather allow users to make a descision based upon incomplete facts than the truth in it's entirety.

interesting, so a) this was a troll, and b) refusing to breach confidence on something as sensitive as sexual harassment by publicly humiliating people who've placed trust in me means that i'm a vile snake in the grass, so there you have, folks - i'm a vile snake in the grass for actually having some semblence of integrity. yaaay me!

just how stupid are you? you are the like the energizer bunny of stupidity - you keep going and going and going...

rc.com's official position is that the users don't have anything thing to say about the pete banishment - the user community's input was neither required nor necessary in light of what was happening. get over it.

i think we should create the tinfoil hat award for the most bizarre conspiracy theory argument and hand it over to diesel__smoke right away. the dude is like enigma with a spell checker.

just how stupid are you? you are the like the energizer bunny of stupidity - you keep going and going and going...

rc.com's official position is that the users don't have anything thing to say about the pete banishment - the user community's input was neither required nor necessary in light of what was happening. get over it.

i think we should create the tinfoil hat award for the most bizarre conspiracy theory argument and hand it over to diesel__smoke right away. the dude is like enigma with a spell checker.

Gosh Di-zell. You sure are high maintenence.

Worse than my last 3 girlfriends put together.

Sheesh.

6 pages and still rolling! Go Diesel Go! 5 or 6 mods/former mods hooked and reeled in!

Pete PMed me some dirty pictures, but I forgive him for it. Now give me the rest of the facts! :lol:

Do I really make it to 'real' troll level?

Thank you Mreardon for being the only civil mod/admin to chime into this thread.

dude. http://www.gamers-forums.com/...ages/smilies/wtf.gif u've gotta be kidding me.

...what a pain the a$$. :evil:

Not me.

Hep me, Jeebus, you can't even present a cogent argument.

Not interested in having someone so clueless have so much errant power.

SKibs

Regarding moderation, the purpose would be to disallow people from being cut off. This has annoyed me very much, locking and suppressing threads is BS.

I concur