Forums: Climbing Information: Access Issues & Closures:
Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Access Issues & Closures

Premier Sponsor:

 


peas


Aug 16, 2004, 9:57 PM
Post #1 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 30, 2002
Posts: 400

Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't know if the news has hit here yet, but if you're interested, you should read this article.

http://www.thetyee.ca/...nt/ChiefGondolas.htm

If you're really interested, you should sign the petition in the Squamish Valhalla Pure, and write to these people:

Ian Sutherland
Squamish Mayor
isutherland@squamish.ca

Sonja Lebans
Acting Mayor of Squamish
admdept@squamish.ca

(The Honourable) Bill Barisoff
Minister of Water Land and Air Protection
WLAP.Minister@gems9.gov.bc.ca


onemistakebigpancake


Aug 16, 2004, 10:10 PM
Post #2 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 162

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

OR... if you are in the area, Valhallpure (the gear shop in the plaza) has a petition going.


verticallaw


Aug 16, 2004, 10:30 PM
Post #3 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 21, 2002
Posts: 552

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Dude that's rough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Stupid lazy people trying to modernize their way to the top. (Might as well suggest escalators to the smoke bluffs as the trails are sooooooooo dificult)

the emails are on their way.


Partner wormly81


Aug 16, 2004, 10:31 PM
Post #4 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2004
Posts: 280

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh thank god. I thought I was going to have to climb my first ascent of the Chief.

:shock:


barc


Aug 16, 2004, 10:45 PM
Post #5 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 19, 2002
Posts: 116

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This kind of stuff drives me crazy. From the article:
In reply to:
“Why not just carve our initials in the rock at the top? Why not turn the Grand Wall into a large screen plasma TV for advertising? Why not put up some waterslides on the Apron?
This is exactly what they are doing. People are so fu*ing stupid.
Elliott


findingit


Aug 16, 2004, 11:15 PM
Post #6 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2003
Posts: 155

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This is the link to the firm that is pushing the project.

http://www.ecosign.com/

Not that they give a rat's ass if you email them, they will be in business regardless. It's the politicians that need us for their jobs. Petition the hell out of them, I'm personally delivering my letter to the mayor's office.


moose_jaw


Aug 17, 2004, 12:17 AM
Post #7 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 2, 2004
Posts: 16

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I LOVE how people can justify almost anything to generate revenue, or because they are just lazy. People should get their priorities straight.


scrapedape


Aug 17, 2004, 5:19 PM
Post #8 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 2392

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Okay, I know I'm going to incur the wrath of a lot of people here, but is this really that bad an idea? Hear me out...

1. This is not a wilderness area. It's right next to a highway that's going to be getting a lot bigger in the near future. The view from the top overlooks a logging town and not one but two pulp mills. We're not talking about the Bugaboos here.

2. Tourons are there already. I've been one of them. I've never climbed the Chief but I've hiked it. So do a lot of other people on any given sunny day.

3. The hike up is nice, but the hike down sucks. What does hiking down get you, other than sore knees? Having a cable car might be nice - like the Grouse Grind, it would be another place to go for a quick hike up and be able to get down fast, and in the dark.

4. It doesn't have to hurt the climbing. Are they going to put this thing right up the face, or out of sight up the back or side? This is key, I think. They've got these things all over Europe, including places like Chamonix, and people still flock there to climb. No one's talking about closing climbing routes for this thing, are they?

5. Yeah, people are lazy. It happens. If they have any money left after the trip to McD's, I'm happy for them to leave it in my home province.

Ok, that's my bit.

Bring on the flames.

:tinfoilhat:


fiend


Aug 17, 2004, 5:34 PM
Post #9 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Plans call for the lift to pass directly over the first summit and to have a 12 foot high fence enclosing most of the second summit so that employees and tourons won't fall off.

It would be an eyesore from town and for those who hike up it. If you don't like hiking then go to Whistler or do the Grouse Grind like everyone else.


peas


Aug 17, 2004, 7:07 PM
Post #10 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 30, 2002
Posts: 400

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

According to the article, the top station would be on the South Summit, which would be the first summit. So it would only be the South Summit that would be completely dedicated to a commercial venture. There is a beautiful crag up there called Raven's Castle that is home to my favourite 5.7 in Squamish and a bunch of nice other climbs. These would definitely be put in Jeopardy.



Addressing Scrapedape's points:

1) Although Squamish started out as a logging town, it is increasingly selling itself as Canada's Outdoor Recreation Capital. Putting a gondola to the top of the Chief might not be the brand that people put with outdoor rec capital and may effect people's view of Squamish.

2) The article mentioned some ridiculous number of people that would be able to be transported to the summit. If you think there are a lot of tourons there now, just wait for the gondola to be put in.

3) Hiking down is just another part of hiking up. What it gets you is down the mountain without having a gondola running up the frontside of the Chief. I'll gladly trade sore knees for no gondola. My guess is that most tourons don't know that up is the easy part and that down is the hard part, and you'll have quite a few McDonald's fed people wallowing their way down the backside trail. Suck it up, and make the hike down.

4) The proposal I've heard is for the gondola to run up above the Bulletheads and Tantalus wall, which would put it in direct view of the highway and would potentially effect a number of climbing areas. I don't think they're at the stage of talking about closing climbing routes. I can imagine that constructiong wouldn't be very climber friendly. Any sort of debris coming down the front face would put a damper on climbing in the Bulletheads, Tantalus Wall, the Dihedrals and over onto at least the southern half of the Grand Wall. Might get rid of a few Peregrines while they're at it, which after all would help climbers too.

5) I'm happy having a better experience in my home province and not having one of my favourite places wrecked so that people don't have to put a little effort into getting an amazing experience.


findingit


Aug 18, 2004, 12:02 PM
Post #11 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2003
Posts: 155

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I sent this to the mayor, see below for his response........

Dear Mr. Sutherland,

I've recently heard a disturbing rumour that someone (Ecosign, Peter Alder) is pushing a project involving the construction of a gondola up the Stawamus Chief. I cannot express how much this disturbs me and all of my friends many of whom visit your town every year to climb, bike and hike. Projects like this are perpetuating the act of reducing nature's challenge and mystique to the lowest common denominator. People must be driven to experience nature on a personal, physical and mental level to realize the emotion that is present when you have accomplished something so grand as ascending the Chief. If you visit a place and can ride a gondola up a mountain you will not return for that experience, you will say "oh I've been there done that, nice view but no big deal really". If you visit a place and ascend a mountain under your own power, regardless of the technical difficulty of your ascent, you will be amazed by the experience and always dream of returning to challenge yourself further.

Sir you are sitting on a gold mine in Squamish. With the exponential increase in the climbing population and the expansion of the highway you will already be experiencing a large increase in visitors in the near future. Please, if you intend to maintain the integrity of your majestic surroundings, oppose the installation of this mechanical eyesore proposed by the money hungry developers.

We are counting on you and your colleagues to protect one of Canada's greatest treasures from this threat. I'm not sure of your personal involvment in outdoor recreation, but I know for a fact if you are a climber or hiker you will feel as strongly as I regarding this topic.

My sincerest regards,



This is his reply (I'm guessing he's been replying to many emails, or has some half witted subordinate doing it for him)..........I'm trying to decide if it's a positive response or a brush-off.......i'm guessing the latter.

Dear Clinton,

Thank you for your letter.

Be assured most of your views.

Best,
Ian


Anyone else have a reply to a letter sent?

later

Clint.


peas


Aug 18, 2004, 6:34 PM
Post #12 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 30, 2002
Posts: 400

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Be assured most of your views???

Does that even make sense?

I haven't sent a letter yet, but will be doing so soon.


beesty511


Aug 18, 2004, 6:47 PM
Post #13 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 4, 2004
Posts: 336

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Addressing Scrapedape's points:
1) Although Squamish started out as a logging town, it is increasingly selling itself as Canada's Outdoor Recreation Capital. Putting a gondola to the top of the Chief might not be the brand that people put with outdoor rec capital and may effect people's view of Squamish.

The new casino in town proves that Squamish really does want to be the Outdoor Recreation Capital. In addition, any place that becomes popular with climbers gets turned into a trash heap, so the "brand" is already tarnished. You can't even drink the water anymore because climbers polluted it.

In reply to:
3. The hike up is nice, but the hike down sucks. What does hiking down get you, other than sore knees?

Hmmm...I would think the hike up would be the thing that would give you sore knees. Hiking down is good training for any skiing you might want to do at Whistler.


simplistic


Aug 18, 2004, 7:39 PM
Post #14 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: 53

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In response to the talk surrounding a Gondola to the top of the chief in Squamish I must add my two cents to the entire ordeal. First, I am a hiker, climber, and advocate of self proppelled wilderness adventures. That said I am also an advocate of change. As a local in the area I understand and can appreciatte the view points of those in oppositiion to such a project, however, the number of persons that climb and hike in squamish must pale in comparison to those that pass through squamish on an annual basis. The relatively small number of hikers and even smaller numbers of climbers that feel that their experiences in squamish would be impacted by the presence of the gondola should, in my opinion, consider that from the top of the chief right now one can view one of the most heavily traveled roadways in the province, a pulp mill, a growing downtown core, new golf courses, new retail outlets, and even the local of a proposed new university in squamish. My point here is that squamish although a great climbing destination is hardly pristine. It is also a community that is going through a time of change and is working towards having tourism as the driving economic machine of the town. The local government and business community has embraced this change which is evident in many ways including supporting the 2010 games, hosting world class bike races, and posting new climbing and park related signage.
The origin of the proposed gondola is unknown to me, and if its economic benefits are to be felt in the community of squamish I am all for it. It appears to me, at this point, that the hiking trails and classic climbs of squamish will not be impacted and as such the gondola would only increase economic activity and also increase the numbers of those who are able to enjoy the majestic beauty of the chiefs summit.
To all those that feel that it is cheating or somehow undermines self proppelled wilderness, I respectfully suggest that we all consider how fortunate we are to have discovered climbing and its rewards and suggest further that bringing people to the top of the chief may have positive impacts for the climbing community.
Simplistic.


michell_e


Aug 18, 2004, 7:51 PM
Post #15 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2002
Posts: 49

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

please excuse the bad composition style, sentence structure, etc...

assuming this isn't a troll (sorry, i didn't research all the links).

Regarding the person who said a gondola wouldn't be so bad, and that it would 'only' be like the grouse grind... sounds like this person has no problem with the grouse grind, but in my experience that's definitely not the opinion of most people who actually enjoy hiking and climbing.
Going up the grouse grind, you may as well be on a stairmaster in some busy meatmarket gym in kitsilano. It's a completely gym-culture, lululemon-uniformed, yuppie abomination of an "outdoor experience" which (I would guess) vancouverites who enjoy squamish for its true recreation value avoid like the plague. I'm not completely trashing it because it does have its value - but so does the chief trail - they're just different.

The fact that the two trails are different (and are currently filling two separate niches) actually brings more business to squamish BECAUSE it's not the grouse grind. I bring visitors to squish preferentially even though it's not always the most convenient day trip. If they put a gondola on the chief, why even bother leaving the city - go to grouse, the view is better, the road up there is less busy, you'll save gas, and you can have a martini at the top when you're done and watch the sunset.

I personally think this gondola idea is ridiculous. However, Gondola or not, the highway, the olympics, etc are going to increase traffic in squamish, and increase the number of visitors to the chief. By NOT building a gondola, we save the crowding of the trail from those too out-of-shape (or too lazy, rushed, whatever) to get to the top without it (because they wouldn't be hiking it anyway). But the number of hikers to the back of the chief will STILL increase (of course by much less), and with that, the impact on the trails, etc.. so maybe we should think a little bit about the increase in maintenance that will be required for the trails, how to keep people from wandering off and completely de-vegetizing (good word, eh?) the access valley and the trails from peak -to-peak?

So who pays for all of this increased maintenance? are we going to see user fees introduced even for hikers with the excuse that the trails need to be maintained?

blah, blah blah, i could go on, but i won't except to say...


Those who think the gondola will only affect the first peak, sorry, you're probably wrong...
If the gondola does go up, we will see a big increase in the number of people heading up to the second and third peaks - these trails are relatively flat and will get the 'offensively large number of people' away from the nasty crowd at the first peak. result - the 1st peak - to 2nd and 3rd peak trails would go from being the least-used to being the most-used segments of trails - so then does the gondola dude have to help pay for the upkeep? what about toilets, does he now have to install toilets on the second and third peaks, too (you know they're going up on the first peak)

okay, now i'm running away on myself i'll stop.

have a great day, everyone. :D


scrapedape


Aug 18, 2004, 8:11 PM
Post #16 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 2392

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
The new casino in town proves that Squamish really does want to be the Outdoor Recreation Capital. In addition, any place that becomes popular with climbers gets turned into a trash heap, so the "brand" is already tarnished. You can't even drink the water anymore because climbers polluted it.

Um, I think there's some sarcasm in here, but I'm having a hard time piecing together your message. What does this say on the topic of whether or not the gondola should be built?

In reply to:
In reply to:
3. The hike up is nice, but the hike down sucks. What does hiking down get you, other than sore knees?

Hmmm...I would think the hike up would be the thing that would give you sore knees.

Hmmm... I'm thinking you've never hiked up anything steep and sustained. Or more to the point, you haven't hiked down it.

In reply to:
Hiking down is good training for any skiing you might want to do at Whistler.
News to me...

simplistic makes some good points. Fact is, people come in all shapes, sizes, ages, and levels of motivation. Lots of people would be happy to shell out money to ride up a gondola, have a drink at the top, etc, who just wouldn't be inclined to hike or climb up the Chief. Does that mean they won't enjoy the scenery as much as the next person? Or that their money's not as green (or blue, or purple, or red, or brown...) as someone else's?

Developing ways to make the scenery available to everyone helps to build the BC brand around the world, making it a destination with appeal to a broader range of people. It means a greater number of visitors get something more out of their experience, and will recommend BC to their friends and families. BC's economy is in the tank right now. That's why I moved to DC. Tourism offers a great source of revenue and jobs but to derive the maximum benefit from it you have to appeal to a wide variety of visitors.

Protecting wilderness is important, but if a project like this can be done without causing undue harm to the existing stakeholders, I say go for it. If it's going to mean the closure of a lot of climbing routes, then it's another matter. But the folks in Squamish know that the Chief as a climbing destination is probably the no.1 thing their town is known for, and they'd be fools to do anything to hurt that reputation.

So go ahead and let them know how you feel.


peas


Aug 18, 2004, 11:40 PM
Post #17 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 30, 2002
Posts: 400

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
But the folks in Squamish know that the Chief as a climbing destination is probably the no.1 thing their town is known for, and they'd be fools to do anything to hurt that reputation.

I don't think this is true. The average person in Squamish is not aware of just how world famous the Chief is. The average non-climber knows Squamish as a pit stop up to Whistler with a large mountain out in front.


virtual


Aug 21, 2004, 5:39 PM
Post #18 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 4

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The gondola proposal is picking up steam, but so is opposition to it. Around Squamish, it's hard to find anyone who supports the plan. A local resident and climber, Megan Olesky, has decided to mobilize the opposition to help kill the proposal, and has formed a group called 'Friends of the Chief'. Although the group is in its infancy, it has begun to tap the increasing anger about the proposal and is growing fast.

Megan has penned an open letter to opponents of the gondola plan. The letter can be found here. It reads in part:

In reply to:
The Park Management Plan of the Chief was completed in 1997 after two years of community consultation. It was an important and time-consuming process that determined the Chief as a natural and unique landmark of cultural importance for British Columbians. Mechanical lift access is not permitted under the management plan.
There has been a proposal put forward to the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection by a group of Whistler developers to construct a gondola up to the second summit of the Chief. This proposal includes 14-16 tram towers, and the capacity to carry 880 people per hour to the summit. Two acres of usable land at the second summit will be fenced off to accommodate an observation deck and visitor facilities.
The current hiking trails on the Chief are some of the most popular and heavily used trails in the province, and the climbing at the Chief is some of the best in the world. To the recreational community, this proposal is akin to suggesting a gondola to the top of El Capitan in Yosemite. It will introduce Industrial Tourism on a large scale to one of the crown jewels of recreation in Squamish and British Columbia.
Thank you for your support in our attempt to maintain and protect the Stawamus Chief Provincial Park. If you would like to be involved in our fight to make sure this gondola does not happen, please write a letter to the following:

Honourable Bill Barisoff, Minister of Water Land and Air Protection
Box 9047 Stn Prov Gov’t,
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
Phone: (250) 387-1187 email: WLAP.Minister@gems9.gov.bc.ca

Honourable Gordon Campbell, Premier of British Columbia
Box 9041 Stn Prov Gov’t,
Victoria, BC V8W 9E1
Phone: (250) 387-1715 email: premier@gov.bc.ca

Mayor Ian Sutherland, District of Squamish
Box 310, Squamish, BC V0N 3G0
Phone: 1-877-892-5217 email: isutherland@squamish.ca


Thank you for all of your efforts and support!
Sincerely,

Megan Olesky
Friends of the Chief

If you wish to contact Megan directly, you can do so at friendsofthechief@yahoo.ca.

Megan will be appearing on Vancouver radio on the Rafe Mair show Monday, August 23rd at 9:15 on AM 600. If you wish to call to express your support, the studio number is (604) 280-0600.

I think Megan's El Cap comparison is apt. I would also compare it to putting a tram on Ayers Rock. Please pass the word.


c-money
Deleted

Aug 21, 2004, 7:29 PM
Post #19 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered:
Posts:

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It is hard to believe that this proposal would be seriously considered... well, money is involved so I guess it is not so hard to believe.

The visual impact of such a project would be huge and would affect every visitor to the area. Sure, there are mills, roads, powerlines, etc. in the vicinity (these are not excuses to further alter the area), but the Chief dominates the Squamish area. Any change to it would have an immediate impact, not just to those climbing on it (a minoity of area users), but to all those simply driving through who place an asthetic value on front-country wilderness features such as the Chief.

What affect would this proposal have on businesses in the Squamish area who, in part, rely on the view of the Chief as a selling feature of their balcony's, patio's, windows, etc? What would the affect be on the property owners who have situated their homes for views of the Chief? Certainly not positive.


virtual


Aug 21, 2004, 7:43 PM
Post #20 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 4

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
What affect would this proposal have on businesses in the Squamish area who, in part, rely on the view of the Chief as a selling feature of their balcony's, patio's, windows, etc? What would the affect be on the property owners who have situated their homes for views of the Chief? Certainly not positive.

The outdoor-oriented businesses in town, such as Valhalla Pure and Climb On, certainly agree. And it's difficult to believe the owners of the Brew Pub support having their signature view ruined.

The best information we have for this proposal has the gondola line beginning near Shannon Falls and travelling up the Bulletheads, across the top of Tantalus Wall and the Grand Wall, right over the First Summit, and across the South Gully to the Second Summit. Not only will it be visible from everywhere in town, but it will dominate visitors' first view of the Chief, as they approach the town on highway 99 from the south.

As I said, it's hard to find anyone in town who thinks the gondola is a good idea. Except perhaps the former mayor - she's the one who tried to destroy the downtown by sticking a chip mill in the middle of it a couple of years back. Her views on Squamish's future are bizarre enough that she just might support it.


Partner iclimbtoo


Aug 21, 2004, 7:51 PM
Post #21 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 10, 2002
Posts: 645

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

All right! Gondolas are good...but's let's clear cut everything too so that people can get a better view, and to make room for possibly MULTIPLE gondolas on one peak! :shock: :? :roll:


simplistic


Aug 21, 2004, 8:18 PM
Post #22 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: 53

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

there are some good points made about the asthetics of the chief and its ability to represent the town and region overall. The point is especially strong considering squamishs' mandate to represent itself as the outdoor capital of Canada. In my previous comments I failed to consider the asthetics and the value it has for the town overall. That said, I still feel that it (the gondola) may have some economic benefit if the asthetic issue could be considered in the design of the project. For example, the Gondola could potentially ascend the southeast portion of the chief and in doing so the current park area and trail system could remain intact, no climbs could be impacted, bulletheads or otherwise, and the users of the Gondola could still enjoy majestic views to the south of howe sound and the suprise of the top could be part of the draw. In this manner the gondola would not impact the asthetics of the town( at least not on the surface, because arguments could be made for the soul of the town being impacted), but thats an entirely new set of ideas........ If this were accomplished the town could still benefit economically and on the surface the town would remain in its current asthetic state. The only issue that would remain is the big one, how do we measure the value of the landscape to our communities if it does not create economic activity. Unfortunately, as we all know our current system does not allow for this type of value system. IE) valuing air water and pristine beauty for its fundamental purpose, sustaining life. We live in a world that requires the movement of MONEY! I do not neccesarily agree with it, but I do not know how to change it, so i am forced to work within the current system. It is for this reason I suggest they built it out of plain view to the town. Great point of asthetics. Anyone interested in valuing our natural world should check out a book called " ecology of commerce', good read. I look forward to more insight on this topic, until my next post........


virtual


Aug 21, 2004, 9:47 PM
Post #23 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 4

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

A few random points:

Is anyone suggesting that people will drive an hour up the Sea to Sky just to ride a tram to the top of the Chief? They can get better views by taking trams in Vancouver or Whistler. The only people that will ride the gondola are people who are driving by here anyway. They are likely to stop, ride the tram, perhaps eat dinner at the top, then carry on to Whistler. There are many other ways we can encourage tourists to stop, and stay, in Squamish, ways that don't involve throwing huge metal contrapions all over the skyline of our primary landmark.

The benefit to Squamish will be limited to a few, mostly low-paying jobs. Squamish residents have, with the chip mill fight, already flatly refused to be bribed by the promise of 'jobs'. Just as with the chip mill, the majority of the work will be low-paying and will be more than offset by the job loss that ruining the appearance of our town's centrepiece will cause.

It has been suggested that the tram will open up the summit of the Chief to those who are unable to climb it unaided. True as far as it goes; but is anyone suggesting that the real reason for the gondola is concern for disabled people? Of course not. The reason is profit, whatever the cost to the town of Squamish. It is unfortunate that there are people who are prevented from enjoying the experience of climbing the Chief. Is the only way we can help them to ruin it for everyone else?

The issue of economic development is a red herring. The Olympics are coming to the Sea to Sky corridor. A university is being built in Squamish. We are in the middle of our biggest ever real estate boom. Anyone who drives the highway to Whistler can see all the new businesses springing up. Economic development is coming to Squamish, and will continue to come. We don't need the gondola.

There is also the objection that there are tons of gondolas in mountain resorts like Chamonix, yet people still climb there. Again, I think this is a red herring. In most cases the trams were there long before the climbing. And those places are quite different. They don't have one central, beautiful, focal point that draws tourists, they have a valley full of ski runs. Does anyone want to put a gondola up Ayers Rock? How about a roller coaster around the Taj Mahal?

In reply to:
For example, the Gondola could potentially ascend the southeast portion of the chief and in doing so the current park area and trail system could remain intact, no climbs could be impacted, bulletheads or otherwise

Yes it could, but that's not what's on the table. The proposal has the tram going right up the rim of the Tantalus and Grand walls, presumably to increase the feeling of vertigo, over the first summit, and on to a restaurant on the second summit. There is no way this can avoid making the skyline of the Chief look silly. And even if the tram did go up the back side, the terminus and restaurant would still be highly visible from the town.

Sorry for venting. I live in Squamish, and this is a bit of a sore point with most of us. Frankly, by far the most common reaction when people first hear of this is laughter. No one can believe that any developer would have such chutzpah.


jefffski


Aug 22, 2004, 1:36 AM
Post #24 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 286

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Squamish has billed itself as "The Outdoor Recreation Capital of Canada." How does a gondola up its focal point promote that ideal?

This summer in squamish i have met people from all over the world, including south africa, britain and spain. in the paring lots there are always cars with license plates from all over the US. Squamish has become a mecca for climbers and more recently for bouldering, not to mention kite boarding, windsurfing, moutaineering, mountan biking and other outdoor activities.

Squamish is enjoying a boom, perhaps not in its traditional industry, but it is slowly making its way back up the economic ladder.

People come to Canada and BC specifically for its pristine wilderness, or at least the perception of it. The gondola proposal does "Natural BC" a disservice.

My american friends, although i take every opportunity to poke fun at your country, it is always ina good hearted way. You are our best friend.

Pleae write to the Mayor of Squamish and let him know that you might not visit (again) if this proposal is accepted.

Mayor: Ian Sutherland
Phone: 604 815-5030
Toll Free: 1-877-892-5217
Fax: 604 815-5032
E-mail: isutherland@squamish.ca

peace

jeff


bubba


Aug 24, 2004, 6:16 AM
Post #25 of 63 (13371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2002
Posts: 284

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

From Gripped.com/ CASBC (www.access-society.ca/)


Gondola on the Chief. Now the fight is for real.

The BC Provincial government has recently announced it intends to allow a group of Whistler-based ski developers to formally solicit public support for their proposal to build a sight-seeing gondola to the Centre (Second) summit of the Chief. This proposition has been mooted for much of the last year, but of late had appeared to be dormant. Now is it coming forward with the encouragement of the BC Government.

The gondola would have its base at the large gravel pit beside the Highway, south of the Chief campground, and would employ 15 or so towers to reach the Centre Peak where the summit area would be fenced off for tourists to shop and unload their money. The lift would hold 22 gondola cabins, look rather like the Excalibur lift on Blackcomb, and carry 880 tourists per hour to the top. It would cross over the Backside trail several times, and skim close by the South summit on its way to the top of the Centre Chief. Ironically, the place chosen for the top station, shopping and restaurant is precisely where, over the years, the ashes of many people have been spread, including Ben De Menche. Climbers descending off Bellygood Ledge would be greeted as they exit the trees by gondolas skimming close overhead with gawking tourists, and people on the South Summit would actually become a tourist attraction for those passing by on the gondola. It is quite reasonable to speculate that over time, the Chief would become branded as a defacto private enterprise, marketed and sold, and what is presently a public space would slowly become a private domain.

An extract from the Minister of Land, Water and Air Protection's August 6th letter to the SAS (in response to our letter of May 28th) is:
...The ministry has informed the proponents that they may choose to seek community support for an amendment to the management plan. In order to do so, the proponent will be required to consult in an open and transparent manner with the local community, First Nations, interested or affected public agencies, users and stakeholder groups. The proponent has indicated that they are interested in pursuing this option. It is expected that public consultations may occur in the fall of this year, in which case I encourage you to participate in the process to ensure your perspectives are brought forward. Should those consultations demonstrate broad community support for a continuation of the park's management plan to restrict mechanized access on the Chief, then we would reflect those wishes....

Although the words are somewhat innocuous the curious way this is coming forward, after much delay and in the teeth of what they must surely know will be major opposition, holds inference of other motives (why stick their necks out so far for such a small project?). One possibility being mooted by some close to the government is that they may be using this as a test opportunity--on the back of the 2010 Olympics--to try and pry open the Park Act to make it politically easier for much larger commercial and industrial exploitation of the provinces park system. If that is so, this is an issue of province-wide concern and it could be a long fight. The government may be quietly intending to proceed unless opposition is overwhelming and politically damaging to them. They will be judge and jury of what constitutes broad community support, with no requirement to measure it in democratic terms, or publish public response results.

A new Squamish community group headed by Megan Olesky; The Friends of the Chief, is developing a campaign to try and derail the gondola, but very considerable support from a coalition of interests will be needed. If you wish to be placed onto their email broadcast list, please write to Megan at: friendsofthechief@yahoo.ca Megan and Squamish Acting Mayor Sonja Lebans are guests on the CKNW's Rafe Mair radio show at 9:15am on Monday August 23rd (tomorrow!) Listeners can call in on (604) 280-0600. We will also send out periodic emails to climbers. There are two attachments with this email for your interest and information: one is the letter written by the Squamish Access Society to Minister Barisoff on May 28th; the other is the excellent "Good Letter Writing Guide" from the Sierra Club. An excellent article on the situation by Lisa Richardson was posted on August 12th on The Tyee, an online news website: http://www.thetyee.ca/News/current/ChiefGondolas.htm

Please forward this email to those you consider appropriate, read the attachments, and write to express your opposition to the gondola and mechanized access into Stawamus Chief Provincial Park. The two organizations that may carry the greatest influence on the provincial government are The District of Squamish (which stands to lose its title of Outdoor Recreation Capital of Canada if the gondola is built), and Squamish Nation.

For now, we suggest emails be sent to the following:

Hon. Bill Barisoff, Minister of Water, Land and Air Protection
(250) 387-1187
WLAP.Minister@gems9.gov.bc.ca

Mayor Ian Sutherland
877-892-5217
isutherland@squamish.ca

Hon. Gordon Campbell, Premier
(250) 387-1715
premier@gov.bc.ca


biff


Aug 24, 2004, 10:01 PM
Post #26 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 5, 2001
Posts: 851

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

honestly .. I don't see how this gondola will make money.

The best way to get these people from builging a gondola is to let them know that they won't make any profit.

I'd like to see their business projections, the nubers that tell them that this is going to be a successful venture.


fiend


Aug 25, 2004, 6:43 PM
Post #27 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Some emails and new info:

In reply to:
This is very serious folks, and if nobody does anything the Chief will be changed forever!

There has been a proposal put forward to the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection to construct a gondola up to the second summit of the Chief. This proposal includes 15 tram towers, and the capacity to carry 880 people per hour to the summit. Two acres of usable land at the second summit will be fenced off to accommodate an observation deck and restaurant facilities!

Please take the time to read the attached document and write letters.

Ivan

Below are a couple of sites where you can read more about the proposal, public hearings are due this fall.

http://findwhistler.com/page.cfm/5157

http://www.thetyee.ca/...nt/ChiefGondolas.htm


In reply to:
CLIMBERS' ACCESS SOCIETY OF B.C.
ACCESS ALERT - AUGUST 2004

Greetings! This message is from the Access Society, with current information and updates about climbing access and related issues in B.C. We hope the news is useful, and encourage readers to share, post and forward it. Our apologies if this broadcast is overly lengthy, or unwanted!


The Stawamus Chief, and surrounding cliffs, are an outstanding landmark and natural feature, only 50 km north of Vancouver. They offer world-class rock climbing, some of the most heavily-used trails in B.C., excellent camping, and superb vantage points. There are tens of thousands of annual climber-days at the Chief. It is B.C.'s home crag, and a 2004 estimate is that recreation at the Chief contributes $20 million annually to the area. Many climbers have moved to Squamish because of the Chief, and it has an important role in the culture and economy of the area. The Chief is largely old-growth forest, apart from the highway/powerline swath in front.

A proposal has been made to the B.C. government, to build a gondola to the second summit of the Chief. It would be based at the gravel pit between Stawamus Chief and Shannon Falls provincial parks, and would ascend via numerous towers to the Bulletheads, the top of Tantalus Wall, the upper backside of the first summit, to a terminal on the second summit. About a hectare on the second summit would be enclosed, with an observation deck and various facilities. Gondola capacity would be 880 passengers/hour. The proposal appears well-financed and serious, and is consistent with government plans for economic development and tourism in the area.

The Stawamus Chief became a Class A provincial park in 1995. For the gondola proposal to proceed, the government would have to overrule the 1997 park master plan, which after two years of community consultation affirmed that the Chief is a natural and unique landmark of cultural importance to British Columbians. The master plan prohibited mechanical lift access, but the government made changes to the Park Act in 2003 which allow it to override the plan if it wishes.

Representatives of the Squamish Access Society, an informal, organized group of Squamish climbers affiliated with the Access Society, met with the gondola proponents several months ago, received a great deal of information about the project, discussed it, and then wrote to the government to express concerns. It was then hoped that, having been giving a fair hearing, the proposal would quietly die. However, the eventual reply from the Minister of Water, Land and Air Protection was as follows:

“The management plan for Stawamus Chief Provincial Park was completed in 1997 following extensive public input. Mechanized access to the Chief is not consistent with the plan, and therefore, under the current management plan, a gondola could not be permitted. The ministry has informed the proponents that they may choose to seek community support for an amendment to the management plan. In order to do so, the proponent will be required to consult in an open and transparent manner with the local community, First Nations, interested or affected public agencies, users and stakeholder groups. The proponent has indicated that they are interested in pursuing this option. It is expected that public consultations may occur in the fall of this year, in which case I encourage you to participate in the process to ensure your perspectives are brought forward. Should those consultations demonstrate broad community support for a continuation of the park's management plan to restrict mechanized access on the Chief, then we would reflect those wishes.”

The nature of the consultative process is not yet known, and the Access Society believes that the government should manage the process and ensure it is impartial. The gondola proposal is being given serious consideration, and community opinion will be an important factor in the government decision. The Access Society will work, particularly with the Squamish Access Society and the Friends of the Chief (friendsofthechief@yahoo.ca), to ensure climbers’ interests and views are represented. We will also publicize developments through our website, broadcast e-mails, and the autumn edition of Access News. It seems likely that information about the proposal will be published, and there will be public meetings, but more is not yet known.

The proposal was discussed on CBC Radio's Early Edition in mid-August, and Megan Olesky, of Friends of the Chief, will be interviewed on AM600 Radio's Rafe Mair show about it at 9:15 AM on Monday August 23rd. 600 kHz in Vancouver, rebroadcast on other stations around B.C., or www.600am.com. Listeners can call (604) 280-0600 and comment.

For now, you can write, phone or e-mail and express your views on the project. The concerned officials:

Bill Barisoff, Minister of Water, Land and Air Protection
P.O. Box 9047, St'n. Prov. Gov't.
Victoria, B.C.
Canada V8W 9E2
(250) 387-1187, or WLAP.Minister@gems9.gov.bc.ca

Gordon Campbell, Premier
P.O. Box 9041, St'n. Prov. Gov't.
Victoria, B.C.
Canada V8W 9E1
Phone (250) 387-1715, or premier@gov.bc.ca

Ian Sutherland, Mayor
District of Squamish
P.O. Box 310
Squamish, B.C.
Canada V0N 3G0
Phone 1-877-892-5217, or isutherland@squamish.ca

Please write or call! A written letter counts for significantly more than an e-mail, and an e-mail for significantly more than a phone call - very simply, the more effort you put into whatever you send/say, the more impact it has. Please:

a) cc the Access Society (see 'contact us' on the website) with anything you send;
b) be polite, and brief;
c) identify who you are, where you live, who you represent (if anyone besides yourself), your interest in the area and issue, your views on the gondola proposal, and the reasons for them;
d) be as reasonable and constructive as you can - there are many aspects to this issue; and
e) be clear about what you support, or oppose.

The Access Society particularly encourages climbers, and climbers' organizations, from outside B.C. to write and express their concerns.

There are also petitions in Squamish-area climbing stores, and petitions may appear elsewhere. Other actions - website information, meetings, broadcast e-mails, attending public meetings - will occur as the occasion demands.

The Access Society's position with respect to the Stawamus Chief gondola proposal is that a gondola of this kind would be appropriate somewhere in the Squamish area, if well planned and designed, and if supported by First Peoples, governments, affected interest groups, and the public. A gondola within Stawamus Chief provincial park is not appropriate. It would:

a) be contrary to the master plan,
b) significantly conflict with existing low-impact users (climbers, hikers, campers, viewers),
c) mar a geological, visual and cultural landmark, and
d) negatively affect the Chief's standing as a national and international landmark and recreational resource.

The proposal also seems likely to generate substantial public comment, and may affect the peregrine falcons which nest on the Chief. There are alternative sites in the Squamish area that would not conflict with existing uses, or have such high environmental, community and visual impacts.


Thank you!
Anders Ourom (president)

PDF Downloads:
Friends of the Chief letter with proposal info and addresses to write. Sized to print and post .
http://www.halcyonclimbing.com/...riendsoftheChief.pdf

Squamish Access Society letter to the Minister of Land, Air and Water.
http://www.halcyonclimbing.com/...tertotheminister.pdf

Sierra Club information on how to write a good letter to the Government.
http://www.halcyonclimbing.com/...tterwritingguide.pdf


fiend


Aug 25, 2004, 7:23 PM
Post #28 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
According to the article, the top station would be on the South Summit, which would be the first summit.

Just to clarify, as stated in Megan's letter, it would be to the second summit.

In reply to:
The new casino in town proves that Squamish really does want to be the Outdoor Recreation Capital.

Squamish Casino? I can only assume that you're thinking of the Wild Cherry set they had up last summer for the filming of The Rock's new movie "Walking Tall". Is there a real casino that those of us living here in town don't know about?

In reply to:
My point here is that squamish although a great climbing destination is hardly pristine.

I see your point in some ways, but think of it like this. Stand on highway 99 and look north. Turning to your left you see the garbage that you described but as it stands you can turn right and see something a little more wild and beautiful like the Chief. Adding a gondola means that you're seeing crap whichever way you look.


One of the problems we're facing is that the gondola would make money, for one person at least. Tourists on their way to Whistler would stop and ride the damn thing. Working at Valhalla Pure, the subject comes up quite frequently and there's a large percentage of people out there who are generally opposed to the idea but wouldn't mind so much if it went through and would probably ride it anyways.

The arguments remain that it would look ugly sitting on top of the Chief, it would only marginally increase the number of tourists who actually stop in the town of Squamish on their way to Whistler, and not everything that takes more than 20 minutes to hike up needs a lift to the top. Whistler and the Grouse Grind are two other gondola options already in place and are less than an hour's drive in either direction.


peas


Aug 25, 2004, 7:38 PM
Post #29 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 30, 2002
Posts: 400

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The Vancouver Sun carried an article on the gondola proposal today. Interesting tidbits from the developers and a first nations representative. Not many clips given from the con side however.

http://www.canada.com/...25-b06d-e833ff3a0067


kman


Aug 25, 2004, 9:11 PM
Post #30 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 16, 2001
Posts: 2561

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Here is a link to the Rafe Mair radio broadcast. Click on the Monday archive It starts talking about the Chief at 01:05:00 http://www.600am.com/pages/Rafe_archives.html


flying_dutchman


Aug 30, 2004, 4:44 PM
Post #31 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 708

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I wish they would scrap the chief gondola idea cause it will only piss off a lotta people and think about the other proposal to put a gondola accross the squamish river up into the mountains on the other side of the valley. That would potentially open up more areas for hiking and climbing.


glowering


Aug 30, 2004, 5:54 PM
Post #32 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2002
Posts: 386

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
It has been suggested that the tram will open up the summit of the Chief to those who are unable to climb it unaided. True as far as it goes; but is anyone suggesting that the real reason for the gondola is concern for disabled people? Of course not.

Unable to climb it unaided?? Nonsense.
A Quadriplegic climbed it!!!! With no friggin gondola.

http://www.verticalchallenge.org/index.html (notice he's against the gondola too).

Here is a guy who designed a rig that uses upper arm power to ascend this rock. But we should put a gondola in another placefor the lazy losers who won't hike.


virtual


Aug 30, 2004, 7:24 PM
Post #33 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 4

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Unable to climb it unaided?? Nonsense.
A Quadriplegic climbed it!!!! With no friggin gondola.

http://www.verticalchallenge.org/index.html (notice he's against the gondola too).

IIRC Brad didn't make it. He had to turn back because of the heat. But a guy with that much spirit WILL make it eventually.

In reply to:
But we should put a gondola in another place

I agree completely. I have heard Mount Habrich and Echo Lake mentioned as possible destinations.


fiend


Aug 31, 2004, 4:56 PM
Post #34 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
But we should put a gondola in another place

I agree completely.

Me too. How about Whistler?


squish


Aug 31, 2004, 5:37 PM
Post #35 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 2, 2003
Posts: 470

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
But we should put a gondola in another placefor the lazy losers who won't hike.

Last I heard, they were feeling the heat from their original proposal, and were also considering to run the towers in a more easterly direction from the base; over Olesen Creek and up onto the crag between Shannon Falls and the Chief.

That might just be a rumour; I can't remember where I heard that. Personally, I can't imagine that someone with that much balls to propose it in the first place would back down so easily. Does anyone know if this is true? Is the space between Shannon and Stawamus listed as Park or Crown land?

I'm strongly against the idea, but if a gondola must be built, it should be better-planned as a means to open access to a larger area, not just some dead-end summit that concentrates hordes of tourons into one small space. That is purely profit-driven and does no service to the outdoor recreation community, the landscape, or anyone's appreciation of this beautiful landmark.

Those who bring up Europe as a benchmark for gondola building should consider that not all gondolas are equal--and while Europe has a few that run to the airy summit of some major feature--most were not built to cater to camera-toting tourons exclusively. A gondola should be able to shuttle tourists to an upper base where their adventures would begin; not end.

A smarter location wouldn't exclude use by the camera-toting tourons, but it would also provide a much wider service. This is just one more reason why Grouse and Whistler are acceptable, but the Stawamus Chief plan isn't.


kman


Sep 2, 2004, 2:40 AM
Post #36 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 16, 2001
Posts: 2561

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I have heard Mount Habrich and Echo Lake mentioned as possible destinations

NOOOOOOOO not Habrich :roll: Aww F!_!ck man. Look at Habrich http://rockclimbing.com/photos.php?Action=Show&PhotoID=9670


scottcody


Sep 2, 2004, 2:49 AM
Post #37 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 27, 2003
Posts: 577

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

From the orginal link posted
In reply to:
The legislation enables the Minister to allow private interests to pursue recreational and tourism developments in parks if, in his opinion, development is “consistent with or complementary to” recreational values.”
Here in lies your problems... looks like the pigs are in the farm house.

But hey look on the bright side, you have socialized medicine.


veilneb


Sep 2, 2004, 3:15 AM
Post #38 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 11, 2001
Posts: 189

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't really see anything wrong with the proposal. In fact, I think the gondola should stretch from Squamish to El Cap and across the valley up Half Dome. Imagine the international venture! It would be great. I will be the first to propose that the gondola cars be designed by Hummer.

We really should do more to reward sloth and gluttony, after all, obesity is only costing the US healthcare system 112 billion dollars a year.

v


cacti-tro
Deleted

Sep 5, 2004, 6:47 AM
Post #39 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered:
Posts:

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

first of all, i went to squamish for the first time in Aug. that being said, i honestly believe that it is one of the most beautiful places in the world. the reason it is so beautiful is because it is NOT what i like to say, "AMERICANIZED".

there is not a single place in U.S. like it. there are places as beautiful origanally, but we have destroyed them all with national parks, state parks, tourists who give less than a sh!t, fences, gondolas, park fees, climbing restrictions for tourists' sake, and worst of alll, we promote fat americans to get off there a$$es and come see the wonderous outdoors from a chair! we promise them they wont have to "exercise" at all. stay fat and enjoy everything you dont deserve because you are only motivated when you hear "Mickey D's", or "Fried". it's the outdoors people, we need to face the fact that pretty nails, fasionable shoes and expensive suits just dont work together, and we shouldn't be trying to make it.

I believe the only reason i so enjoyed my stay at Squamish was because it is seemingly untouched. there is a nice small town, some of the most enjoyable company of locals and respective passers by like me. if tourist really want to see the excellent view, make them climb like everyone else has already done.

i've been climbing for almost 2 years now, and although i've only climbed V8, i feel like the hike up the Chief was an accomplishment, and it made the view way better than it could ever have been after a five minute ride in a chiar, eating some mini doughnuts.

If you are not willing to break a sweat to get to the top, THEN TOUGH LUCK!!!!!! i'll show you my pictures when i get back down.

Squamish is a worldly gem and i dont think they should change a thing. if i could, i'd change the 2010 olimpics to some other place also. thats going to have an impact. :(


floater


Sep 5, 2004, 3:56 PM
Post #40 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 8, 2003
Posts: 37

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

A crime, a crime, a crime it would be. But not a surprise. There's not much that stands in the way of developers these days it seems. We had a similar proposal long ago in Newfoundland where they wanted to put a gondola to the top of Gros Morne. It is a super long hike in but to hell with it. If you can't do it... you can't do it. Anyway, luckily the wind and weather conditions were too unpredictable to warrent the build and instead the money went to a huge interpretation centre.


bandycoot


Sep 6, 2004, 6:08 AM
Post #41 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Fuck civilized society and its "dumbing down" or "least common denominator" drift. That makes me want to vomit. What's next, an elevator up El Capitan? One of those moving walkways on Everest? People suck!


lightandfast


Sep 6, 2004, 8:14 AM
Post #42 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 31, 2003
Posts: 174

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

EVERYONE GET INVOLVED, E-MAIL THE POWERS THAT BE, TOGETHER WE CAN STOP THIS!!!!!!!!!!


vanclimber


Sep 6, 2004, 8:18 AM
Post #43 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 31, 2002
Posts: 202

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Here is the letter I wrote:


Honorable Gordon Campbell, Premier of British Columbia

Honorable Premier,

I am writing to express my opposition to the gondola project being considered for the Stawamus Chief. As a Vancouver resident and soon to be property owner, I consider Squamish to be the best place in my world to relax and get away from the city and it's unending streams of people. As a climber who travels several times a week to Squamish for bouldering and rope climbing, I find the idea of a private gondola on a public park, especially one so steeped in history and local culture as the Chief, to be distasteful at the very least and environmentally irresponsible in general. Squamish has earned it's title as "Outdoor Recreation Capital of Canada" by offering some of the most spectacular and adventurous activities around while retaining a pioneering spirit. This reputation has great meaning when you consider the number of beautiful and exciting places you can travel to in our country.

I have ascended the Chief several times via the backside trail, and it has always been a hike that has given me a sense of accomplishment. When you sit at the South Peak and look down onto Howe Sound, you can really feel a connection with the generations of people who have the same climb. At the same time, this level of hiking is accessable to a wide cross section of the population, and I have seen both young and old enjoying this unique and rewarding hike.

By adding a gondola, we would be taking away something that is integral to the close sense of community that is present in Squamish. I cannot recall a place that I have travelled to where the people were more generous or more friendly than those of Squamish. Taking advantage of this characteristic would be deeply regretable in the future.

Please reconsider before supporting this proposal.

Respectfully,

Donald Springford

Here is the response I got:

Thank you for your email regarding a proposal for a gondola within Stawamus
Chief Provincal Park.

I appreciate your sharing your views with me and have forwarded a copy of
your email to my colleague, the Honourable Bill Barisoff, Minister of Water,
Land and Air Protection, for his review and attention. I assure you that
Minister Barisoff will give your input every consideration.

Thank you for taking the time to inform me of your views on this matter.

Sincerely,

Gordon Campbell
Premier

pc: Honourable Bill Barisoff


mkjwngoat


Sep 6, 2004, 1:11 PM
Post #44 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2003
Posts: 35

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It seems to me that If you build the gondola, then in ten years you'll have this massive thing up the side of the mountain that nobodys uses because the thrill has worn off. Then the comanies involved will get out because it costs more to maintain the thing and pay workers than they make off of it. To keep it from becoming an eyesore, the local government will have to take over financing. Eventually, it'll just be a target for punk kids to mess with. a nasty thing like that will have a predictable effect on tourism. It's happened before.

Alternative: kick the proposers in the nuts. It won't accomplish much, but I'd kinda like to see it.


fiend


Sep 7, 2004, 4:46 PM
Post #45 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If anyone is feeling up to writing letters I was recently told that the best thing you can do is send in hardcopy... you know.. with stamps and all.

A poli-sci major might be able to correct this info but I was told that certain forms of formal protest recieve modifiers when submitted.

ie:
A signature on a petition represents one person's opinion.
An email represents the opinions of 10 people.
A printed snail mail represents the opinions of 100 people.

Therefor, 10 written letters equal 1,000 signatures on a petition.


We probably have about 1,000 signatures on the petition aimed at the district of Squamish as of now and more people are signing every day. Whatever the actual modifier is, imagine if all of those people decided to write a letter as well.


overlord


Sep 8, 2004, 4:13 PM
Post #46 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

man, i hope they wont build it.

if youre too lazy to walk (and then descend) then dont go. its your problem.


fiend


Sep 9, 2004, 4:09 PM
Post #47 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Mailed my two letters (to Gordon Campbell and Bill Barisoff) today.


brokentaylor


Sep 22, 2004, 11:30 PM
Post #48 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 28, 2002
Posts: 2

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Like any other summit, If you can not reach the top by climbing or hiking, TOO BAD!


squish


Sep 23, 2004, 7:37 AM
Post #49 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 2, 2003
Posts: 470

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

There will be a council meeting on September 28th at 7:00pm, where the developer will make their presentation. I'm taking the night off work to be there, and I'm hoping there will be a tough crowd to send these clowns back to Whistler with their tails between their legs.

I called the district office, and they confirmed that it will be held at Brennan Park Leisure Centre rather than council chambers, I guess due to heavy interest in this issue. Please show up too, if you care about the Chief.


sileebailey


Sep 27, 2004, 6:04 PM
Post #50 of 63 (10526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 2

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I am an avid hiker and just getting into outdoor climbing. The Chief has been a favorite destination for years.
I have been reading the comments in this forum for and against the gondola.
Perhaps the only argument that could have held any validity for me is the potential of increasing business for Squamish. The argument I believe is that a gondola would make people stay longer and spend more money in Squamish.
Unfortunately, I feel this is not likely.
Already there are reams of tour buses stopping at the Chief. No gondola isn't discouraging them. Most of these tourist will not hike the Chief, but do the short walk to see Shannon Falls. They then get back in the bus and continue onto Whistler, they are not stopping in Squamish town itself. Adding a gondola is not going to make people stop in the town and spend money. The money from this venture is going to go into the pockets of the gondola owners not to the locals. And who will pay the price? Climbers, hikers, etc. Will the trail suddenly be gated and given open/close times like Grouse in order to avoid lawsuits?
The arguement that the gondola will allow more people to appreciate nature is also ridiculous. People are already enjoying nature just by driving up the Sea to Sky, looking at Shannon falls...and hey those tourists will be taking the gondola up at Whistler where the views are better anyways.
For those who are arguing for the gondola, please do not be naive in thinking this is at all going to be helping the local businesses in Squamish. The money will be going elsewhere. It they want more people to stop in town, they should build something in town to attract people there.
The locals will be much more aided by the continued marketing of Squamish as a ecotourist mecca. This is where the goverment should be placing their attention!


Partner missedyno


Sep 29, 2004, 6:40 PM
Post #51 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2001
Posts: 4465

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
There will be a council meeting on September 28th at 7:00pm, where the developer will make their presentation. I'm taking the night off work to be there, and I'm hoping there will be a tough crowd to send these clowns back to Whistler with their tails between their legs.

I called the district office, and they confirmed that it will be held at Brennan Park Leisure Centre rather than council chambers, I guess due to heavy interest in this issue. Please show up too, if you care about the Chief.

How did it go?


bubba


Sep 29, 2004, 6:52 PM
Post #52 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2002
Posts: 284

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

From Squamishclimbing.com:

Council voted to possibly allow further discussion of a gondola in the area (which could still include the park) but not to the top of any of the Chief's 3 summits. This echoed the sentiments of the Squamish First Nations group who saw the proponents proposal before it went to council.
Overall it was a pretty quick meeting - all said and done in just under an hour.

Also:

http://vancouver.cbc.ca/regional/servlet/View?filename=bc_chief20040929


squish


Sep 29, 2004, 7:12 PM
Post #53 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 2, 2003
Posts: 470

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
How did it go?

Quite well. There was a fairly good crowd. The gym wasn't over-packed, but all the chairs were filled, at least. Here's some highlights:

A representative of BC Parks was there, and explained the history of the park and the current management plan, as well as the process of possibly changing the plan to allow mechanized construction therein. This meeting, he pointed out, is merely a first step to see if the idea should be pursued any further.

The proponent made their presentation, and showed how well they actually recognize the local geography. One of them repeatedly referred to the mountain as the "Chieftain," which is actually a bar/hotel in downtown Squamish (we all think it's run by the H-A's). A question came from council asking whether they'd considered a more sensitive line, by perhaps running the gondola towards Goat Ridge. The answer was "and Goat Ridge is... where exactly?" Haha, well, that answered that question. They also talked about having spoken with the Squamish First Nations and that they "weren't exactly jumping up and down at the idea, but left the door open to discussion." Councillor Corinne Lonsdale, our former mayor, later asked a pointed question saying that she heard that the Nation had "shut the door" on them regarding The Chief. (This question came after another councillor was reminded that the meeting was about the District's input, and not the Squamish Nation; they have their own separate process. Councillor Lonsdale pointed out that the Squamish Nation are one of our constituents, and that this was feedback she had received from them.) The proponent was backed into admitting that they had "left the door open, but that they said definitely not on the Chief." This was received by loud cheers from the audience.

In the end, the council was given three options, one being that they approve of the plan, second being that they reject a gondola in the area, and third that they would approve a plan, but not on The Chief.

They voted "not on The Chief," which was well received by the audience. It still leaves the door open to gondola development quite nearby, as they briefly mentioned a second idea to run the line between Shannon Falls and Stawamus Chief parks. But, effectively, we've sent them back to the drawing board, for them to determine if the new plan would be feasible, and start with a whole new approval process. At least, that's how it seemed to me.


slabbyd


Sep 29, 2004, 7:51 PM
Post #54 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 40

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Between the Chief and the Shannon Falls, is forest and broken bluffs leading the logged out valley below Habrich and Sky Pilot. So... you wouldn't be able to see Shannon Falls, the backside of the chief looks like a forest covered wart and a clear cut valley has never rated high on the tourist attraction scale. Basically there would be an ok view of Howe Sound and the highway. Sounds like a loosing venture to me.


fiend


Sep 29, 2004, 7:56 PM
Post #55 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Those who have spoken with the proponents of the Gondola have said that they knew that they weren't going to get the Chief as a site but it helped them get the proposal out there and sift through a lot of the initial BS and reaction to a gondola at all.

The problem is still the amendment of the Forest Service Plan to allowe mechanized transport in a Class A park. It's good that it won't be on the Chief but still bad that it will be anywhere else in the park.

I think far too many people went home from the meeting last night thinking that this was all over. There are still problems with a gondola being run anywhere in that area.


slabbyd


Sep 29, 2004, 8:05 PM
Post #56 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 40

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I find it hard to believe that any other location in that area would have the pull to make it economically viable. So so far the Squamish City Council and the First Nations have said no to the Chief. Aren't there two more stakeholders? The Olympic Committee and who else? Do you think they'll say no go? I doubt it.

I would bet they continue to focus on the Chief. The fight probably hasn't even begun.


squish


Sep 29, 2004, 8:33 PM
Post #57 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 2, 2003
Posts: 470

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Those who have spoken with the proponents of the Gondola have said that they knew that they weren't going to get the Chief as a site but it helped them get the proposal out there and sift through a lot of the initial BS and reaction to a gondola at all.

You mean we were trolled? It's probably true to some extent--part of the aim high strategy, and all that. Although if that's the case, they didn't present themselves as very knowledgeable or sensitive to the local area.

In reply to:
The problem is still the amendment of the Forest Service Plan to allowe mechanized transport in a Class A park. It's good that it won't be on the Chief but still bad that it will be anywhere else in the park.

I think far too many people went home from the meeting last night thinking that this was all over. There are still problems with a gondola being run anywhere in that area.

Yeah, I'm not too sure what this means. It could mean that an alternate plan might not be feasible for them, and that would be the end of it; or else they were counting on this decision all along. It doesn't seem like it, though. They weren't prepared with anything to indicate that they even researched any other alternatives.

To me, "not on The Chief" means not in Stawamus Provincial Park, which is pretty much all that the park encompasses, or am I wrong?


peas


Sep 30, 2004, 12:38 AM
Post #58 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 30, 2002
Posts: 400

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The park encompasses more than the Chief. I believe it covers the land across Oleson Creek from the Chief as well to a fair distance up the Oleson Creek Valley. That would make it pretty tough to run a gondola from near the highway/Chief/Shannon Falls anywhere up on to of Shannon Falls, Goat Ridge, etc. without going through a provincial park.


flying_dutchman


Sep 30, 2004, 4:22 PM
Post #59 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 708

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
The Chief Wins the Day

At a special meeting of Squamish Council, Tuesday evening September 28th, the two Whistler developers seeking to build a gondola to the summit of the Centre Chief made their formal public presentation to solicit support from the Mayor and six Councillors. This was preceded by a 10 minute presentation by Tom Bell of the Ministry of Water, Land & Air Protection, explaining the details of the public process.

After the developers' presentation the concept was discussed by Squamish Council then politely but firmly rejected to loud applause. This followed, as was stated at the meeting, a similar rejection by Squamish Nation earlier the same day that was reportedly less than polite.

It was an extraordinary event. About 200 climbers attended, and for many it was their first Council meeting. Three Vancouver television stations were present, as well as print and radio media, and many climbers were interviewed. The developers presentation was halting at times, and some of their comments, such as the Chief being only for "...an elite group of very fit young people" brought groans from the audience. The red lapel buttons from Anders Ourom, declaring "Friend of the Chief", were a big hit. Almost everyone attending, including elected officials, snapped them up.

One lasting effect of the no-gondola campaign, the media attention on climbing values, and the high attendance at the meeting is that climbers have now staked out a political presence in Squamish that has gained the respect and attention of elected officials and the media. This bodes well for the future. We will need it, as major issues are upcoming in the not-so-far-distant future.

Squamish Council's decision was in the form of a motion that indicated their rejection of a gondola on the Chief itself, but it left open the door to discussion of a gondola elsewhere. The proponents alluded to an interest in perhaps looking at going up from the same base area by Olesen Creek into the general area north of Shannon Falls, but what comes of that remains to be seen. The financial plan may not be as promising, and Stawamus Chief Provincial Park extends much further south than many realize, even encompassing most of Shannon Falls itself. Shannon Falls Park is quite small, basically the flat land up to the foot of the falls, most of the Papoose and hillside above it.

That being so, First Nation's and Squamish Council's rejection of the gondola in Stawamus Chief Provincial Park would most likely require the proponents to start all over again for another location near Shannon Falls, and Bill Barisoff, Minister of Water, Land & Air Protection, may be glad to have that opportunity to ditch the idea once and for all.

Our congratulations go to all who participated in ways large and small in this two-month campaign, most especially Megan Olesky and Ron Enns of Friends of the Chief, supported by Tyrone Brett, John Irvine, Andrea Harris, Marie Palmer, Anders Ourom, Paul Demers, Lisa Richardson, myself, and a cast of hundreds.


Kevin McLane
chair, Squamish Access Society


Postscript One of the developers told television media after the meeting that "...only climbers and First Nations are against the proposal, currently 99% of the population does not have access to the climbers' private sandbox".


fiend


Sep 30, 2004, 5:08 PM
Post #60 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
The Chief Wins the Day

....

Postscript One of the developers told television media after the meeting that "...only climbers and First Nations are against the proposal, currently 99% of the population does not have access to the climbers' private sandbox".

The best part of the council meeting was when when Peter Alder said something to the effect of only the young elite being able to get to the top right now and a clearly aged voice from the back shouted something I couldn't make out. I think she was shouting something about being 65 and hiking the Chief with no problems... the people applauding her drowned out her voice pretty fast.


fiend


Sep 30, 2004, 5:11 PM
Post #61 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
The park encompasses more than the Chief. I believe it covers the land across Oleson Creek from the Chief as well to a fair distance up the Oleson Creek Valley. That would make it pretty tough to run a gondola from near the highway/Chief/Shannon Falls anywhere up on to of Shannon Falls, Goat Ridge, etc. without going through a provincial park.

One of the places that some of the locals are trying to convince them would be better is up to a ridge on Habrich which would provide access to biking, climbing and backcountry skiing in winter. It could probably also be done with only one or two support towers in the actual Stawamus Chief Provincial Park.

Mathews and Alder already own the gravel lot they want to use as the gondola base station and I don't think they'll give it up easilly and move elsewhere


Partner tattooed_climber


Oct 18, 2004, 3:12 AM
Post #62 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 4838

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

No Gondola for the Chief
Wednesday, September 29, 2004
No Gondola on the Chief. Squamish council grounds bid...

At a special meeting of Squamish Council, Tuesday evening September 28th, the two Whistler developers seeking to build a gondola to the summit of the Centre Chief made their formal public presentation to solicit support from the Mayor and six Councillors. This was preceded by a 10 minute presentation by Tom Bell of the Ministry of Water, Land & Air Protection, explaining the details of the public process.

After the developers' presentation the concept was discussed by Squamish Council then politely but firmly rejected to loud applause. This followed, as was stated at the meeting, a similar rejection by Squamish Nation earlier the same day that was reportedly less than polite.

It was an extraordinary event. About 200 climbers attended, and for many it was their first Council meeting. Three Vancouver television stations were present, as well as print and radio media, and many climbers were interviewed. The developers presentation was halting at times, and some of their comments, such as the Chief being only for "...an elite group of very fit young people" brought groans from the audience. The red lapel buttons from Anders Ourom, declaring "Friend of the Chief", were a big hit. Almost everyone attending, including elected officials, snapped them up.

One lasting effect of the no-gondola campaign, the media attention on climbing values, and the high attendance at the meeting is that climbers have now staked out a political presence in Squamish that has gained the respect and attention of elected officials and the media. This bodes well for the future. We will need it, as major issues are upcoming in the not-so-far-distant future.

Squamish Council's decision was in the form of a motion that indicated their rejection of a gondola on the Chief itself, but it left open the door to discussion of a gondola elsewhere. The proponents alluded to an interest in perhaps looking at going up from the same base area by Olesen Creek into the general area north of Shannon Falls, but what comes of that remains to be seen. The financial plan may not be as promising, and Stawamus Chief Provincial Park extends much further south than many realize, even encompassing most of Shannon Falls itself. Shannon Falls Park is quite small, basically the flat land up to the foot of the falls, most of the Papoose and hillside above it.

That being so, First Nation's and Squamish Council's rejection of the gondola in Stawamus Chief Provincial Park would most likely require the proponents to start all over again for another location near Shannon Falls, and Bill Barisoff, Minister of Water, Land & Air Protection, may be glad to have that opportunity to ditch the idea once and for all.


Kevin McLane
chair, Squamish Access Society


Copied from the Arc'Teryx Website
http://www.arcteryx.com/...logfile=Gondola-Blog


gunkyjon


Jan 7, 2005, 12:39 AM
Post #63 of 63 (9952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 17, 2004
Posts: 10

Re: Squamish Chief Gondola Proposal [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The gondola idea is stupid
After the olympics is over how much will the government pay to maintian it? After all the hike up the chief is not that hard after all. I dont know what the hell the government is thinking. All the government is going to do is piss off a bunch a climbers, hikers, and etc.


Forums : Climbing Information : Access Issues & Closures

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook