|
healyje
May 21, 2011, 3:25 AM
Post #276 of 287
(4783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
There seem to be no shortage of folks who attempt to claim clean climbing, LNT, and hard free climbing didn't really happen in the 70's - can't imagine why.
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
May 21, 2011, 5:18 PM
Post #277 of 287
(4747 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
Trads essence IMO is found in Scotland.
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
May 21, 2011, 9:41 PM
Post #278 of 287
(4732 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
wmfork wrote: healyje wrote: I've been working my current project with a guy twenty five years younger who climbs 5.13 sport, so far he's making it one move higher than me, but only after I lead the pitch, which he has yet to do. So far I call the two approaches a wash in this case. So your climbing partner has a lot to learn about trad leading, route finding, etc, etc. Addressing those issues would make him a better climber, no doubt. He's actually well versed as both a sport and trad climber, it's just that the pitch was initially X rated due to very technical, marginal pro. Now that I've led it five times with him following he's more than capable of leading it on his own and we now consider it R-rated due to our familiarity with it.
wmfork wrote: If you think running, swimming, and losing weight is how you'll be able to progress on your project, then that's what you'll do. I'm not really one of those people into 'training' per se, I either get in shape doing what I love or I don't. And most especially with climbing I'm definitely not into 'training' - I mean, why waste the time when I could be climbing.
wmfork wrote: I'm merely trying to be realistic: becoming better at climbing (or anything) may require doing things you don't like. I've always been one of those unfortunates who suffers from 'sporadic hedonism' and finds pain, discomfort, and 'things I don't like' unrewarding. Terrible, I know; some years even I don't know how I muddle through it all, but using my free time to do things I don't like doing ain't one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
May 23, 2011, 8:00 AM
Post #279 of 287
(4689 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
healyje wrote: wmfork wrote: healyje wrote: I've been working my current project with a guy twenty five years younger who climbs 5.13 sport, so far he's making it one move higher than me, but only after I lead the pitch, which he has yet to do. So far I call the two approaches a wash in this case. So your climbing partner has a lot to learn about trad leading, route finding, etc, etc. Addressing those issues would make him a better climber, no doubt. He's actually well versed as both a sport and trad climber, it's just that the pitch was initially X rated due to very technical, marginal pro. Now that I've led it five times with him following he's more than capable of leading it on his own and we now consider it R-rated due to our familiarity with it. So, is it "R" or is it "x." Either it's dangerous to fall on, or it's not. How well you know the moves is irrelevant.
In reply to: wmfork wrote: If you think running, swimming, and losing weight is how you'll be able to progress on your project, then that's what you'll do. I'm not really one of those people into 'training' per se, I either get in shape doing what I love or I don't. And most especially with climbing I'm definitely not into 'training' - I mean, why waste the time when I could be climbing. wmfork wrote: I'm merely trying to be realistic: becoming better at climbing (or anything) may require doing things you don't like. I've always been one of those unfortunates who suffers from 'sporadic hedonism' and finds pain, discomfort, and 'things I don't like' unrewarding. Terrible, I know; some years even I don't know how I muddle through it all, but using my free time to do things I don't like doing ain't one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
May 23, 2011, 8:24 AM
Post #280 of 287
(4685 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
guangzhou wrote: So, is it "R" or is it "x." Either it's dangerous to fall on, or it's not. How well you know the moves is irrelevant. Well, I'd disagree. Once you know know the moves and feel reasonably confident you can navigate them, then I have a hard time calling the moves X rated. First couple of times up it, cleaning on lead and trying to sort out marginal and technical pro, definitely X-rated. As it is both the moves and the pro are highly technical for the first 60-70ft. of the pitch. I've taken one 40-50 footer on a reasonable piece after that stretch and definitely wouldn't want to fall on that lower bit.
|
|
|
|
|
jstan
Aug 27, 2011, 8:31 AM
Post #281 of 287
(4555 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2003
Posts: 37
|
You all will have to forgive me for not reading the whole thread. The thread is entitled,"Trad climbing, what's in a name?" Here is the full answer. It is what ever the person speaking intends the word "Trad" to mean. No two people agree. I learned this on one of my first climbs with Willie Crowther, my teacher. One day he asked if I wanted to do Birdie Party. I just said "Yes!" though I had no guide book and did not know it was an aid climb. Willie wore old Sears pants whose back pockets were out and would not hold his hammer. It would just fall through and hang at full length below him. There he was hanging from one hand at the ceiling using his teeth and the free hand to thread the hammer back up through the torn out pocket. It was a three pound sledge and he never needed more than two whoomps! to set a pin. Then he carefully put the hammer back in his pocket. It of course immediately again fell full length. The truth could not have been more self-evident. This was Willie's form of climbing. I have not the slightest doubt when he had a new set of pants with good pockets, he did not consider that he was doing the climbs properly. Already in my first month of climbing, I learned the answer to all manner of questions over which people get twisted up in their shorts. And lead to threads lasting thousands of posts. Besides having an absolutely superb instructor, I had one other really big advantage. I was already 26 years old and doing significant deeds was not why I had come to the Gunks. While snowshoeing around in the Adirondaks I had decided I needed to come to the Gunks and learn how to use a rope. That was the whole of it. Pure and simple. Unfortunately the Gunks was a trap. After spending just a little time with these people, you can't bear to leave. Too funny. Too bright. Too interesting. Bottom line? If you let any of the very strange arguments and attitudes, reduce your enjoyment of the people, you have entirely missed out on the real fun. Take my word for it. When you are old and crotchety, it's the people you will miss. Above there are various statements about what Stannard did or did not do. Frankly they are all largely off the mark. But it makes no difference at all what Stannard did. As long as you do not damage the rock or the area, do not change the rock or the climbing available to others, and do not prevent others from enjoying themselves as they choose to enjoy themselves you are free to climb as pleases you. Bear in mind though. If you choose to take great risks, your friends will miss you when you are gone.
(This post was edited by jstan on Aug 27, 2011, 8:50 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Aug 27, 2011, 1:12 PM
Post #282 of 287
(4540 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
jstan wrote: You all will have to forgive me for not reading the whole thread. The thread is entitled,"Trad climbing, what's in a name?" Here is the full answer. It is what ever the person speaking intends the word "Trad" to mean. No two people agree. I learned this on one of my first climbs with Willie Crowther, my teacher. One day he asked if I wanted to do Birdie Party. I just said "Yes!" though I had no guide book and did not know it was an aid climb. Willie wore old Sears pants whose back pockets were out and would not hold his hammer. It would just fall through and hang at full length below him. There he was hanging from one hand at the ceiling using his teeth and the free hand to thread the hammer back up through the torn out pocket. It was a three pound sledge and he never needed more than two whoomps! to set a pin. Then he carefully put the hammer back in his pocket. It of course immediately again fell full length. The truth could not have been more self-evident. This was Willie's form of climbing. I have not the slightest doubt when he had a new set of pants with good pockets, he did not consider that he was doing the climbs properly. Already in my first month of climbing, I learned the answer to all manner of questions over which people get twisted up in their shorts. And lead to threads lasting thousands of posts. Besides having an absolutely superb instructor, I had one other really big advantage. I was already 26 years old and doing significant deeds was not why I had come to the Gunks. While snowshoeing around in the Adirondaks I had decided I needed to come to the Gunks and learn how to use a rope. That was the whole of it. Pure and simple. Unfortunately the Gunks was a trap. After spending just a little time with these people, you can't bear to leave. Too funny. Too bright. Too interesting. Bottom line? If you let any of the very strange arguments and attitudes, reduce your enjoyment of the people, you have entirely missed out on the real fun. Take my word for it. When you are old and crotchety, it's the people you will miss. Above there are various statements about what Stannard did or did not do. Frankly they are all largely off the mark. But it makes no difference at all what Stannard did. As long as you do not damage the rock or the area, do not change the rock or the climbing available to others, and do not prevent others from enjoying themselves as they choose to enjoy themselves you are free to climb as pleases you. Bear in mind though. If you choose to take great risks, your friends will miss you when you are gone. Who the Hell are you to presume to know what Stannard did or did not do!? (Sorry. I couldn't resist.)
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Aug 27, 2011, 1:35 PM
Post #283 of 287
(4535 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
j_ung wrote: Who the Hell are you to presume to know what Stannard did or did not do!? (Sorry. I couldn't resist.) You realize you've possibly gone over the heads of some of the self-avowed expert historians on this forum? And parody often has a difficult time here as well.
|
|
|
|
|
rangerrob
Sep 13, 2011, 11:32 AM
Post #284 of 287
(4480 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 8, 2003
Posts: 641
|
JStan says very eloquently what I have been flubbering to say the whole time. In the end it makes no difference really what you call it, because "IT" is just a silly thing we do.
|
|
|
|
|
jjones16
Sep 14, 2011, 3:54 AM
Post #285 of 287
(4456 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 2, 2010
Posts: 80
|
+1 I don't give a shit where it came from. I look up to people that do ballsy things period; mostly because I'm not of that of that ilk. I shit myself (still) on multipitch 5.7. I'll plug gear, clip bolts, wrestle pebbles and have fun, period. I won't ever bolt a route because I'm lazy. I clean up trash where I climb and I encourage others to do the same, but only so the areas don't get shut down, not because I have some innate love of nature. I'm not especially great at climbing, but I love it just the same. I don't send hard, and I get Elvis leg on just about every route I attempt. Nevertheless, I consider myself a climber as all of you do. It's a shame, though, that as climbers almost every thread ends up in a pissing contest. Come on man. Make your point, be heard (or read rather) then move on. Save the ego-intensive dick measuring contests for the roid-ridden ball sports.
|
|
|
|
|
hugepedro
Sep 14, 2011, 8:58 AM
Post #286 of 287
(4446 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
Crusty Old Farts wrote: It's climbing without weighting the rope.
Ripe Old Farts wrote: It's a combination of the route and how you climb it.
Greasy Green Farts wrote: It's no bolts
Beans (not yet even farts) wrote: * *It will be whatever the Beans decide it is. They will win by attrition.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Sep 15, 2011, 2:28 PM
Post #287 of 287
(4385 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
healyje wrote: guangzhou wrote: So, is it "R" or is it "x." Either it's dangerous to fall on, or it's not. How well you know the moves is irrelevant. Well, I'd disagree. Once you know know the moves and feel reasonably confident you can navigate them, then I have a hard time calling the moves X rated. First couple of times up it, cleaning on lead and trying to sort out marginal and technical pro, definitely X-rated. As it is both the moves and the pro are highly technical for the first 60-70ft. of the pitch. I've taken one 40-50 footer on a reasonable piece after that stretch and definitely wouldn't want to fall on that lower bit. The protection rating isn't personal. That's like saying, there's absolutely no gear but I can solo it blindfolded, therefore it's a safe lead. The X rating merely conveys that a fall at any crux sequence will be be dangerous if not fatal. Just because you can navigate that section without worry doesn't change the protection. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|