Forums: Climbing Information: Beginners:
Newb Cordallette Anchor
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Beginners

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All


caughtinside


Mar 30, 2005, 1:31 AM
Post #26 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yes, 48" runners are nice. I don't often use them on routes, but they are great for slinging trees and using for anchors. I don't use 12" runners, you can just double a 24" one.

Also, I prefer to girth hitch tree limbs, as opposed to looping around, as you have done. That way, there's only one part of the sling through the biner, pulling one direction.


illimaniman


Mar 30, 2005, 1:34 AM
Post #27 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 21, 2002
Posts: 128

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Without the overhand knot your anchor is not redundant and violates the "no extension" rule. If any piece of protection blows, you'll shock load the system. If any strand of the cord is cut, the whole thing will come undone. Just so there's no misunderstanding: ALWAYS TIE AN OVERHAND (OR FIGURE 8 IF YOU'RE SO INCLINED) IN YOUR CORDALETTE ANCHOR


enjoimx


Mar 30, 2005, 1:34 AM
Post #28 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: 378

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

That tree anchor is not redundant. If any one of those strands fails, the whole anchor fails. If you dont believe me, weight the anchor and cut one strand with scissors. The lesson might be worth the 8 buck cordolette.

A figure eight or overhand makes it redundant.


bmxer


Mar 30, 2005, 1:46 AM
Post #29 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: 220

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

OK THANK YOU FOR TELLING ME ABOUT THE OVERHAND KNOT. Let me requote myself. "lol actually I did after I took the pictures"
Like I said, it's not hard to tie an overhand knot and I did. Then I untied it. Not a big deal.

CAN SOMEONE ACTUALLY HELP, WHERE I ASKED FOR HELP.

w/ exception to caughtinside who did answer my runners question. However I read in a book that a girth hitch is not such a wise choice because it puts strain on the part that's being cinched and reduces the strength of the runner.


Partner gunksgoer


Mar 30, 2005, 2:11 AM
Post #30 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 1290

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
However I read in a book that a girth hitch is not such a wise choice because it puts strain on the part that's being cinched and reduces the strength of the runner.

there may be some truth to that, but if you loop the slings around the branches like you have, theres danger of loading the biner 3 ways, wichcould be just as bad if not worse as girth hitching the sling


chemicalclimber


Mar 30, 2005, 3:38 AM
Post #31 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 79

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

you could go buy some webbing and learn to (correctly) tie the water knot. Then you can sling things that are too big to girth hitch, or you can use the "wrap three pull two" method of tying around objects.


dontfall


Mar 30, 2005, 4:11 AM
Post #32 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 31, 2003
Posts: 2798

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

http://www.evula.org/.../captain.obvious.jpg


bmxer


Mar 30, 2005, 4:45 AM
Post #33 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: 220

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post


T5.9


chemicalclimber


Mar 30, 2005, 5:09 AM
Post #34 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 79

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Am I being insulted or am I being thanked for taking the role of Captain Obvious?

In case its the former- no one had pointed it out, and the OP, obviously a newb (said so himself), might not have though of it. So bite me.


bmxer


Mar 30, 2005, 6:20 AM
Post #35 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: 220

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I wouldn't mind having a couple of 48 inch runners, but I do have 30 feet of webbing, I just don't want to cut it yet.


kman


Mar 30, 2005, 7:29 AM
Post #36 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 16, 2001
Posts: 2561

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
ok I just built a cordallette anchor in my backyard from a tree.




Here's some things I noticed about it. But I would appreciate feedback.

- Obviously the branches are about 2-3 inches thick, thicker would be better snip...

http://img.photobucket.com/.../Soteki/DSC05587.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/.../Soteki/DSC05586.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/.../Soteki/DSC05585.jpg

If you were actually using the tree as a real anchor and not for practice you would want your anchor to be around the entire base of the tree.


Partner bear829


Mar 30, 2005, 4:11 PM
Post #37 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1407

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Am I being insulted or am I being thanked for taking the role of Captain Obvious?

In case its the former- no one had pointed it out, and the OP, obviously a newb (said so himself), might not have though of it. So bite me.

Well, I am Captain Obvious and that means that there can't be two of us....so you do the math. But if you need help, I think it was an insult. :lol:


chemicalclimber


Mar 31, 2005, 9:11 AM
Post #38 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 79

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

okay, I'll be captain oblivious. :(


jimdavis


Apr 1, 2005, 7:15 AM
Post #39 of 39 (4240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 1, 2003
Posts: 1935

Re: Newb Cordallette Anchor [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Without the overhand knot your anchor is not redundant and violates the "no extension" rule. If any piece of protection blows, you'll shock load the system. If any strand of the cord is cut, the whole thing will come undone. Just so there's no misunderstanding: ALWAYS TIE AN OVERHAND (OR FIGURE 8 IF YOU'RE SO INCLINED) IN YOUR CORDALETTE ANCHOR

Be careful using the word always, and the word never. There is a time and a place for everything.

Yes, usually you want to pre-equalize...usually, not always.

And "use a overhand or a fig 8"... or a figure 9, or 15, or 21, ect. You can do that to take up length and shorten up the master point.

Jim

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Beginners

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook