Forums: Community: Campground:
Ethics of climbing companies
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Campground

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All


Partner phaedrus


Jan 6, 2006, 11:39 PM
Post #76 of 80 (4192 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 3046

phaedrus moved this thread [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

phaedrus moved this thread from Gear Heads to Community.


pico23


Jan 7, 2006, 12:56 AM
Post #77 of 80 (4192 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 14, 2003
Posts: 2378

Re: Ethics of climbing companies [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Target was founded in Minneapolis, Minnesota in 1902, and is still based there
Your right. I apologize for that bit of miss information. But the main point still stands, just replace Target with Toyota and French with Japanese. And you are right, the American empire will undoubtedly fall. I think I stated that before. But when it falls is something that can be influenced.
In reply to:
Actually, no, I mean the never ending war on terror! And congress is handcuffed at this point on Iraq but it made it clear that the US is pulling out sometime soon. Congress DID NOT DECLARE WAR ON IRAQ OR TERRORIST. Therefore the president HAS NO AUTHORITY UNDER THE CONSTITUTION TO EXPAND HIS POWERS which he would in a time of war. BTW, Congress was also duped by a misleading president into the war. A war the president wanted since the first day of his presidency.

My favorite all time quoute is during the 2000 pres election debates with
Gore. President Bush stated, as president this nation will not undertake nation building. Funny we've already undertaken rebuilding of at least two nations.

As far as the Tsunami, some things are just too big to pass up. Even the US government needs good press sometimes. Remember imediately after the tsunami US gov got bashed for not doing enough. And I do think I clearly stated that the US occasionally does something not in it's best interest. Ironically, I have no problem with our country looking out for itself, I have a problem with idiots in this country believing our government is so benevolent that it hurts the US. What hurt the US in both credibility and financially for probably another generation is the pre emptive war on a nation that had nothing for us to preempt.

You are sadly confused. And I feel bad for you. I feel bad for myself too because people like you are the reason Americans are increasingly hated throughout the world.

I'm glad that you read the mind of George W. Before he was elected. You should have told everyone that he wanted a war. Don't get me wrong, hes a jackass, but its not like the Democratic party had a much better offering. And last I checked, we are still in the war in Iraq, so why is the pres not entitled to the power given to him in a time of war?

The balance of power you seem of speak of is temporary at best. By power I think you must mean things like the Patriot Act and the likes. (if thats not it, start specifying things, its hard to argue when you are making very general statements...) Unfortunately, those were also approved by congress, though they are about to get kicked out the door by congress. (I hope so anyway.) Some of it was also deemed unconstitutional by the courts. The balance cannot always, if ever, be perfect, but the mechanism to equalize itself is in place and that is (in my opinion and the opinion of most people I know, including teachers) what the founding fathers most likely envisioned.

Its cool if you feel bad for me and yourself, but I don't understand why. If others hate me because of my values, that sucks. Its part of human nature I guess. We both have what seems to be inverse views on our countries policies. I'm sure we can both agree on one thing: we cannot change each others opinions. Aryemanhattanforme was right in that there is lots of bad information in this thread, from myself included. (see above.) I consider myself lucky to have participated in this argument because I learned something.

Again, we are not at war. We have a military action in Iraq. By no means is it less a war to the people on the ground and their families but it has legal meanings to everyone. it's not splitting hairs, legally there is a major difference.

The patriot act was at best needed at the time and even then a mistake which gave too broad of powers. Talk about vague the patriot act is filled with vagueness. Congress realizes it shouldn't be permanent. it essentially terminates the bill of rights. and there have been many abuses since it was created.

The spying without even a warrant from the secret court is the greatest and most illegal abuse of power yet. You clearly aren't up to date on the last few months. It's not as though there weren't legal means to wiretap. IMO, if something is illegal it's illegal. There was a legal way to conduct this sort of spying and an illegal way.

I'm a firm believer that if you don't protect your rights and even the rights of others you will eventually have nothing left to protect. It's easy to say that doesn't affect me so I couldn't care less but things eventually change and stuff does start to affect all involved. Better to preemptively protect your rights than to do it after being sucker punched.


zackattack


Oct 7, 2008, 4:13 PM
Post #78 of 80 (511 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 7, 2008
Posts: 2

Re: [maldaly] Ethics of climbing companies [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

maldaly wrote:
good effort, tattooed_climber, you got most of it right. Of the big clothing companies, Patagonia and Outdoor Research are about the only independents left.

Sadly, that ray of light has dimmed further. Outdoor Research was bought by Dan Nordstrom, back in 2003:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/..._dannordstrom04.html

And to illustrate the point, check out http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/...259163_retail11.html, which describes the shift to overseas production, and even includes a quote from Nordstrom himself rationalizing it.

"We're a very technical gear company, so we have to have the very latest of technologies and fabrics," Nordstrom said. "The textile industry in the U.S. is a remnant of what it used to be."

Manufacturing is not all that is being taken overseas -- international sales have doubled in the past year, making up a fifth of all sales. Military sales are now 35 percent of the total -- nearly caught up to North American sales, which are 45 percent of the whole.



dingus


Oct 7, 2008, 8:56 PM
Post #79 of 80 (488 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [zackattack] Ethics of climbing companies [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

zackattack wrote:
And to illustrate the point, check out http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/...259163_retail11.html, which describes the shift to overseas production, and even includes a quote from Nordstrom himself rationalizing it.

"We're a very technical gear company, so we have to have the very latest of technologies and fabrics," Nordstrom said. "The textile industry in the U.S. is a remnant of what it used to be."

What a sad sack of shit the rich boy Dan Nordstrom is. Reworded: After we forced the US textiles industry to offshore we can no longer afford to sew locally either.

FMT


zackattack


Oct 7, 2008, 9:10 PM
Post #80 of 80 (484 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 7, 2008
Posts: 2

Re: [dingus] Ethics of climbing companies [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Seriously.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Community : Campground

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook