|
rubber_man
Apr 3, 2010, 11:28 PM
Post #126 of 252
(1612 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2010
Posts: 273
|
PC+
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Apr 4, 2010, 3:27 AM
Post #127 of 252
(1604 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
this is correct
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Apr 4, 2010, 5:47 AM
Post #128 of 252
(1601 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
macherry wrote: this is correct
uslly. If teh orignl post mks mostly snes w/out edits.
|
|
|
|
|
rubber_man
Apr 4, 2010, 6:12 AM
Post #129 of 252
(1599 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2010
Posts: 273
|
macherry wrote: this is correct
wow i've drawn macherry's attention twice this week. I'm relatively impressed with myself for being nOOb-ish.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Apr 4, 2010, 9:02 PM
Post #131 of 252
(1582 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct uslly. If teh orignl post mks mostly snes w/out edits.
Es, und meye post d00n't mks snes w/ out edits. 
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Apr 4, 2010, 10:15 PM
Post #132 of 252
(1575 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
rubber_man wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct wow i've drawn macherry's attention twice this week. I'm relatively impressed with myself for being nOOb-ish.
but, you don't come off as NOOBish
i just noticed your PC!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Apr 4, 2010, 10:18 PM
Post #133 of 252
(1574 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
chadnsc wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct uslly. If teh orignl post mks mostly snes w/out edits. Es, und meye post d00n't mks snes w/ out edits.
Which brings me to a question, what is the highest PC ever achieved at RC.com without having one post based in an altered state. (Including the broad range here from so-tired-you-can't-see-straight to on major narcotics?) Anyone clear 1,000 without it?
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Apr 4, 2010, 10:42 PM
Post #134 of 252
(1572 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: chadnsc wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct uslly. If teh orignl post mks mostly snes w/out edits. Es, und meye post d00n't mks snes w/ out edits. Which brings me to a question, what is the highest PC ever achieved at RC.com without having one post based in an altered state. (Including the broad range here from so-tired-you-can't-see-straight to on major narcotics?) Anyone clear 1,000 without it?
4 or 5.........maybe
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Apr 4, 2010, 10:46 PM
Post #135 of 252
(1570 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
macherry wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: chadnsc wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct uslly. If teh orignl post mks mostly snes w/out edits. Es, und meye post d00n't mks snes w/ out edits. Which brings me to a question, what is the highest PC ever achieved at RC.com without having one post based in an altered state. (Including the broad range here from so-tired-you-can't-see-straight to on major narcotics?) Anyone clear 1,000 without it? 4 or 5.........maybe
4 or 5 have cleared a 1,000 without posting altered or you made it 5 posts into this site before posting drunk?
|
|
|
|
|
rubber_man
Apr 4, 2010, 11:41 PM
Post #136 of 252
(1564 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2010
Posts: 273
|
macherry wrote: rubber_man wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct wow i've drawn macherry's attention twice this week. I'm relatively impressed with myself for being nOOb-ish. but, you don't come off as NOOBish i just noticed your PC!!!!
I'll take that as a compliment.
|
|
|
|
|
rubber_man
Apr 4, 2010, 11:42 PM
Post #137 of 252
(1562 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2010
Posts: 273
|
macherry wrote: rubber_man wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct wow i've drawn macherry's attention twice this week. I'm relatively impressed with myself for being nOOb-ish. but, you don't come off as NOOBish i just noticed your PC!!!!
so thank you
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Apr 5, 2010, 1:31 AM
Post #138 of 252
(1558 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: macherry wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: chadnsc wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct uslly. If teh orignl post mks mostly snes w/out edits. Es, und meye post d00n't mks snes w/ out edits. Which brings me to a question, what is the highest PC ever achieved at RC.com without having one post based in an altered state. (Including the broad range here from so-tired-you-can't-see-straight to on major narcotics?) Anyone clear 1,000 without it? 4 or 5.........maybe 4 or 5 have cleared a 1,000 without posting altered or you made it 5 posts into this site before posting drunk?
i'm thinking no one has posted more than a few posts without being under the influence. have you seen what people post here!?!?!!?
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Apr 5, 2010, 1:32 AM
Post #139 of 252
(1557 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
rubber_man wrote: macherry wrote: rubber_man wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct wow i've drawn macherry's attention twice this week. I'm relatively impressed with myself for being nOOb-ish. but, you don't come off as NOOBish i just noticed your PC!!!! I'll take that as a compliment.
it's rare
oh yeah and post count ++
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Apr 5, 2010, 1:37 AM
Post #140 of 252
(1555 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
I don't tink dat wurd means vut you tink it means.
|
|
|
|
|
rubber_man
Apr 5, 2010, 2:01 AM
Post #141 of 252
(1536 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2010
Posts: 273
|
chadnsc wrote: I don't tink dat wurd means vut you tink it means.
but yet....
macherry wrote: this is correct
so what am i missing?
|
|
|
|
|
rubber_man
Apr 5, 2010, 2:02 AM
Post #142 of 252
(1534 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2010
Posts: 273
|
macherry wrote: rubber_man wrote: macherry wrote: rubber_man wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct wow i've drawn macherry's attention twice this week. I'm relatively impressed with myself for being nOOb-ish. but, you don't come off as NOOBish i just noticed your PC!!!! I'll take that as a compliment. oh yeah and post count ++
do you have a limit of how many compliments you give out a month, or year?
just wondering 
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Apr 5, 2010, 2:37 AM
Post #143 of 252
(1531 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
rubber_man wrote: chadnsc wrote: I don't tink dat wurd means vut you tink it means. but yet.... macherry wrote: this is correct so what am i missing?
The original premise of the question.
I still don't think that word means what you think it means.
U R Doin it Wr0nG!
|
|
|
|
|
rubber_man
Apr 5, 2010, 2:45 AM
Post #144 of 252
(1529 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2010
Posts: 273
|
chadnsc wrote: rubber_man wrote: chadnsc wrote: I don't tink dat wurd means vut you tink it means. but yet.... macherry wrote: this is correct so what am i missing? The original premise of the question. I still don't think that word means what you think it means. U R Doin it Wr0nG!
Oh noez! Corretz mez nowz. I is no wantingz to be banz!
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Apr 5, 2010, 12:45 PM
Post #145 of 252
(1515 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
macherry wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: macherry wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: chadnsc wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: macherry wrote: this is correct uslly. If teh orignl post mks mostly snes w/out edits. Es, und meye post d00n't mks snes w/ out edits. Which brings me to a question, what is the highest PC ever achieved at RC.com without having one post based in an altered state. (Including the broad range here from so-tired-you-can't-see-straight to on major narcotics?) Anyone clear 1,000 without it? 4 or 5.........maybe 4 or 5 have cleared a 1,000 without posting altered or you made it 5 posts into this site before posting drunk? i'm thinking no one has posted more than a few posts without being under the influence. have you seen what people post here!?!?!!?
I think I've made it...but I'm not about to go through that level of digging into my past.
However, I interpreted the question as not about posting under the influence, but as posting about the influence. If it's the former, then we're asking about things that are somewhat blurred by the mists of time.
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Apr 5, 2010, 1:02 PM
Post #146 of 252
(1512 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
macherry wrote: granite_grrl wrote: macherry wrote: chadnsc wrote: granite_grrl wrote: macherry wrote: granite_grrl wrote: chadnsc wrote: snoopy138 wrote: chadnsc wrote: I thought PC, PC+, PC++, and PC+++ where all referencing massive post counts, not computer programming. Now go away you anal nerd. where do you think the phrase "pc++" comes from. Well its slang here on RC.com it's all about a big post count. In the computer world it's an acronym for personal computer and in the world of politics it's all about political correctness. I'm not sure if you're serious or trying to troll me. but it's worth a pc++ I see how you are. No, no you don't. that's how it works Mysterious Marge....gotcha. come on gg post count + but then you're out climbing and i'm at a family easter function. gg for the winz
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Apr 5, 2010, 1:04 PM
Post #147 of 252
(1511 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: chadnsc wrote: snoopy138 wrote: chadnsc wrote: I thought PC, PC+, PC++, and PC+++ where all referencing massive post counts, not computer programming. Now go away you anal nerd. where do you think the phrase "pc++" comes from. Well its slang here on RC.com it's all about a big post count. In the computer world it's an acronym for personal computer and in the world of politics it's all about political correctness. Different sub cultures often take a word to warp or completely change its meaning. Take the term dork for example. Its actual meaning is a sperm whales penis, we use it as an insult thinking it means nerdy or unpopular. Now shut up and go away dork. Wow. Almost anyone else I'd give credit for a clever troll, but I think Chad is simply clueless.
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Apr 5, 2010, 1:07 PM
Post #148 of 252
(1510 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
j_ung wrote: dominic7 wrote: Hmm, when did doc knock me out of the top 5? Probably during some PBR-fueled content run. Irrelevant, since none of your ilk came about his or her post count yakking about climbing. As far as I'm concerned, there's only one person above me who has a legitimate right to be there: jt512. Edit: 
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Apr 5, 2010, 1:21 PM
Post #149 of 252
(1509 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
rubber_man wrote: chadnsc wrote: rubber_man wrote: chadnsc wrote: I don't tink dat wurd means vut you tink it means. but yet.... macherry wrote: this is correct so what am i missing? The original premise of the question. I still don't think that word means what you think it means. U R Doin it Wr0nG! Oh noez! Corretz mez nowz. I is no wantingz to be banz!
You getz teh BANZ!
Wait , what the hell where we talking about again?
|
|
|
|
|
imnotclever
Apr 5, 2010, 1:38 PM
Post #150 of 252
(1625 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2003
Posts: 10000
|
oh what the hell.
PTFTW
|
|
|
|
|
|
