Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Trad Climbing:
Placement in Flaring Cracks
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Trad Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All


lucas_timmer


May 21, 2005, 5:25 PM
Post #26 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 28, 2004
Posts: 562

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I may have also tried a cam, either a smaller one deep in or a larger one further out- but a cam may not work depending on how flared the crack is.
This is where Wild Country Offset Friends come in (very) handy.


vanman2004


May 26, 2005, 4:23 AM
Post #27 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 17, 2005
Posts: 23

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
NO thanks, I won't be trying this bizzare idea.

Not a bizzare idea. Pretty well accepted actually. I think it might even be in freedom of the hills or some other such "climbing textbook." There are many tools in the arsenal. I don't think anyone's suggesting that this technique replace "tensioned opposition."

Look, why don;t you try some esperiments before you go with your book endorsed BIZARRE trick?

Not one person has claimed to have fallen on such a placement. If you want to debate the usefulness of weighted pieces staying in under rope drag or wiggle, then maybe you should have some experice with pulled placements and solid ones, hmmm?

Well accepted, gee, at one time it was well accepted that the earth was flat, that in climbing you had to have three points on all the time, and in computing that the country would need about three, total.

Whether or not someone has fallen on it is irrelevent, because it has no effect on the strength of a placement in a fall.

Why would it be inneffective, besides the fact that you think it is bizzarre?


alpnclmbr1


May 26, 2005, 4:42 AM
Post #28 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 3060

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
in the event of a fall, a nut that might not hold you is a better bet than nothing, which certainly will not hold you...


hosh.

That's pretty simplistic. And doesn't seem to consider that where one person plugs a nut that might stay in and hold a fall, another person can with a bit of thinking and trickery can get a bomber piece.

Your post seems to suggest "oh well, it ain't great but it's better than nothing" which is a dangerous attitude.

The one shining light in this entire thread.


Weighting a sling to help prevent a piece from walking is one of the oldest tricks in the books. (it has been advocated in numerous instructional guides.)


dirtineye


May 26, 2005, 3:22 PM
Post #29 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Weighting a sling to help prevent a piece from walking is one of the oldest tricks in the books. (it has been advocated in numerous instructional guides.)

Perhaps you can provide an example of yourself using this stupid idea with success, having fallen on such a placement without pulling the gear?

YOU must know that the plain vanilla bowline was once thought a good knot for rescue, and was advocated for this purpose, until it was discovered that the bowline can fail in certain circumstances. Of course, these days, nobody advocates the plain old bowline, because now they are wiser.

Just as, you can still find climbing dinosaurs who continue to chain biners together to extend aslimg or placement, even though it always has been and continues to be a bad idea.

Still waiting for someone to proclaim thier experience falling on weighted sling placments that held.


vanman2004


May 26, 2005, 3:29 PM
Post #30 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 17, 2005
Posts: 23

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Weighting a sling to help prevent a piece from walking is one of the oldest tricks in the books. (it has been advocated in numerous instructional guides.)

Perhaps you can provide an example of yourself using this stupid idea with success, having fallen on such a placement without pulling the gear?

YOU must know that the plain vanilla bowline was once thought a good knot for rescue, and was advocated for this purpose, until it was discovered that the bowline can fail in certain circumstances. Of course, these days, nobody advocates the plain old bowline, because now they are wiser.

Just as, you can still find climbing dinosaurs who continue to chain biners together to extend aslimg or placement, even though it always has been and continues to be a bad idea.

Still waiting for someone to proclaim thier experience falling on weighted sling placments that held.

I would think that you're a troll, but you have a whole lot of posts, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.


The weight of shoes on a placement will NOT make a difference once you fall, so whether or not someone has fallen on it is irrelevant. This only effects how well the placement stays in place when being pulled by rope drag, etc., and many people can attest to how well it works.


dirtineye


May 26, 2005, 3:51 PM
Post #31 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:

I would think that you're a troll, but you have a whole lot of posts, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.


The weight of shoes on a placement will NOT make a difference once you fall, so whether or not someone has fallen on it is irrelevant. This only effects how well the placement stays in place when being pulled by rope drag, etc., and many people can attest to how well it works.

Gear that won't hold a fall does not work.

Why do you place gear? To hold a fall. It is not irrelevant to question such a dubious idea as the weighted sling.

As I stated earlier, and several times, just how much rope wiggle do you think a pound or two will prevent? The answer is not very much. Your cherished method falls in the category of psychological pro, which is worthless in a fall.

People just believe what they want to believe.

The fact that you take post count into account in evaluating what's in a post shows just how illogical you are. I hope you use better sense placing gear.


Partner euroford


May 26, 2005, 4:00 PM
Post #32 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 2913

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
blablabla

look budy, it works ok? i don't see why your getting all bent out of shape about feeling this need to debate it. no, i've never fallen on one of these pieces (i don't make a habit of falling on anything....), but yes i've clipped my shoes to a nut and have had the weight prevent ropedrag from causing it to dislodge, as confirmed by my 2nd.

look, if you don't want to try it, fine, its something i might do once a year but its just another trick to add to your quever.

sheeeesh.....

:roll:


just for the hell of it, i'll also point out that the only place i've ever used this technique is at our local cragging spot here at Devils Lake State Park in WI. its a super hard quartzite rock that is extremely fractured, slick and sandbagged. its also about only 90 feet high, so protecting these routes can be very tricky with highly varied sizes and nuts that are prone to dislodge and cams that are prone to walking. on top of this, your so damn close to the ground that decking is an ever present possability.

at other places i've climbed (lumpy, eldo, rmnp, witchitas) i've not felt the need to try this out. but i damn sure would if the placement presented itself and thats the point in mentioning it.


dirtineye


May 26, 2005, 4:09 PM
Post #33 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:

look budy, it works ok?... ...no, i've never fallen on one of these pieces

Right.


Partner euroford


May 26, 2005, 4:11 PM
Post #34 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 2913

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:

look budy, it works ok?... ...no, i've never fallen on one of these pieces

Right.

you must be as bored as i am today....


dirtineye


May 26, 2005, 5:48 PM
Post #35 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:

look budy, it works ok?... ...no, i've never fallen on one of these pieces

Right.

you must be as bored as i am today....

I am.


brutusofwyde


May 28, 2005, 12:35 AM
Post #36 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 3, 2002
Posts: 1473

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
As I stated earlier, and several times, just how much rope wiggle do you think a pound or two will prevent? The answer is not very much. Your cherished method falls in the category of psychological pro, which is worthless in a fall.

There is a tension traverse on the Prow on Washington Column, up near the top. The tension traverse leads into an OW/chimney which can be protected with a Forrest Titon Chimney Chock. This was back in the day when the Prow was still considered a hard-man nailing route, mind you.

Now one of the problems with this situation is that no matter how long a sling you put on the Titon, unless you climb quite high unprotected above your pendulumn point, there will be rope lifting it out. Most of the rest of the pitch is unprotected.

Solution? I hung about 20 pounds of gear (half the rack) on the chock, solving two problems at once: The Titon would not lift out, even though tensioned opposition wasn't possible, and I completed the pitch 20 pounds lighter.

Dirtineye, I respect many of your posts. But just because you have not had the occasion to use a tool from the toolbox properly, doesn't mean it's not valid.

As for me not taking a fall on such pro, well, my philosophy about falling has been stated many times. Still doesn't mean the trick is not useful if used properly.

Brutus
Old Climbers' Home
Oakland, California


dirtineye


May 28, 2005, 4:49 AM
Post #37 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Butus,

HEHE. OK you win because twenty pounds might actually work.

And I'll bet you did the hanging directly on the piece and not on the sling that the rope runs on.

As for Titons, I have a few, and more to the point I have a friend who insists they are the best thing ever invented for climbing pro, and he even manages to get them stuck in a good spot once in a while. Yes, I have a climbing partner who still climbs on Titons in this day and age.


blondgecko
Moderator

May 28, 2005, 5:53 AM
Post #38 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
And I'll bet you did the hanging directly on the piece and not on the sling that the rope runs on.


I would hope not!

Think about it this way:

An average trad draw is at least a foot long, right? Now, in order for the rope to pull the piece out, it would have to pull the rope end of the draw up at least that distance. With average light-weight draws this is absurdly easy, and the friction of the rope in the krab is enough to hold them up.

Now, add a bit of weight (say half a pound) to the rope end of the draw. Suddenly things change quite a bit. In order to put an upwards force on the piece, the rope needs to lift this half-pound weight the length of the draw - again, about a foot. The thing is, this doesn't happen. Unless you have an extremely tight belay, what will happen is that every time you move, it'll get lifted slightly and then drop back to the bottom when your belayer gives out slack. Thus, the chances of the piece lifting out are drastically reduced.

What about in the event of a fall? Well, in order to pull out, this hypothetical piece requires a significant outward force with very little downward component. Without the weight there, that's easily the case. The draw is probably alread more or less horizontal due to rope drag, so that the first little bit of tension in the rope pulls the piece more or less directly outwards. Now, think about the weighted case. Here the draw is hanging vertically, and that first pull is onto the 1/2-pound weight. Now, in order to transmit an outwards force to the piece, that 1/2 pound weight has to swing up to bring the draw to horizontal, using only the friction of the rope through the draw. Thing is, by the time this happens, if it's likely to happen at all, you're already well below it on your 9.8 ms-2 joyride.

But what if we hang the weight directly on the piece? Hmm... not so good, I'm afraid. In this case, you've lost your mechanical advantage - rather than lifting the weight a foot or more, you only need to lift it the half-inch or less required to shift the piece out of its seat.

I hope this is a clear description. If you think it's wrong, I'm sure you'll feel free to flame away...


dirtineye


May 28, 2005, 1:58 PM
Post #39 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
And I'll bet you did the hanging directly on the piece and not on the sling that the rope runs on.


I would hope not!

Think about it this way:

An average trad draw is at least a foot long, right?

Stpo here. NO. Sorry, never heard of a trad draw. 2 feet wouldl be the minimum extension on a dubious piece that you didn't want to jostle.

In reply to:
Now, in order for the rope to pull the piece out, it would have to pull the rope end of the draw up at least that distance. With average light-weight draws this is absurdly easy, and the friction of the rope in the krab is enough to hold them up.

Now, add a bit of weight (say half a pound) to the rope end of the draw. Suddenly things change quite a bit. In order to put an upwards force on the piece, the rope needs to lift this half-pound weight the length of the draw - again, about a foot. The thing is, this doesn't happen. Unless you have an extremely tight belay, what will happen is that every time you move, it'll get lifted slightly and then drop back to the bottom when your belayer gives out slack. Thus, the chances of the piece lifting out are drastically reduced.

Look, I've saoid over and over what I thought about a half pound having nuch effect here. If you can't se that puting a serious amount of weight on the piece itself and then having a long sling to further reduce any chance of lifting is better. I'm sorry.

If you really think your section of rope that weighs at least a pound, can't swing a bit and move 1/2 a pound, I hope you never have to truly depend on your method.

Why don't you set up this little experiment at home adn try your way and the way I suggested and report back what happened?

In reply to:
What about in the event of a fall? Well, in order to pull out, this hypothetical piece requires a significant outward force with very little downward component. Without the weight there, that's easily the case. The draw is probably alread more or less horizontal due to rope drag, so that the first little bit of tension in the rope pulls the piece more or less directly outwards. Now, think about the weighted case. Here the draw is hanging vertically, and that first pull is onto the 1/2-pound weight. Now, in order to transmit an outwards force to the piece, that 1/2 pound weight has to swing up to bring the draw to horizontal, using only the friction of the rope through the draw. Thing is, by the time this happens, if it's likely to happen at all, you're already well below it on your 9.8 ms-2 joyride.

But what if we hang the weight directly on the piece? Hmm... not so good, I'm afraid. In this case, you've lost your mechanical advantage - rather than lifting the weight a foot or more, you only need to lift it the half-inch or less required to shift the piece out of its seat.

I hope this is a clear description. If you think it's wrong, I'm sure you'll feel free to flame away...

If your half pound nmoves at all, you're probably done on this crappy piece. Know what a pendulum is? ever notice how easy it is to set one in motion? Know anything about a harmonic oscillator, and how a wiggling rope could create such oasillations on your weighted sling?

Try the little experiment. As long as you have the weight (a large one as Brutus actually used) directly on the piece and the rope on a long sling, you're going to get a better result than with your short sling with an inadequste weight, which will move every time theh rope moves.

Even a large weight on the end of a sling is more apt tp move under normal rope wiggling than the setup I described.


brutusofwyde


May 28, 2005, 3:04 PM
Post #40 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 3, 2002
Posts: 1473

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
And I'll bet you did the hanging directly on the piece and not on the sling that the rope runs on.


I would hope not!

Think about it this way:

Think about it this way:

I've just finished a penji into a new crack system. An Offwidth/Chimney that I will have to free climb.

I want to do 4 things:

1. minimize rope drag by making the rope path as straight as possible, because climbing OWs and Chimneys are bad enough without making things worse by having the rope make a huge "Z"

2. keep the piece from lifting out.

3. protect myself as early as I can without creating a lot of rope drag

4. dump any pieces I have not used to that point which I won't likely need. because this rack weighs about 30 pounds, and OWs and chimneys are bad enough without dragging 20 pounds of un-needed gear up the thing with me.

If I clip the rack onto my extension sling, the rope will make a "Z" creating impossible rope drag, negating any potential beneficial effects from the runners.

If I clip the rack directly to the piece, the rope is free to run in a straight path, while the rack holds the piece in place.

I don't use "trad draws" whatever those are. I use full "shoulder length" runners, large enough to loop over my shoulder, bandolier style. Or double-length, enough to loop over my shoulder when doubled. In this case, I used one double-length runner plus one single-length runner in series clipped to the piece, to straighten the rope path as much as possible.

Would it have held a fall? absolutely. Even a fall from 60 feet above the piece, as I neared the belay.

But still, I'd rather not fall. And I didn't.

Brutus


blondgecko
Moderator

May 29, 2005, 1:17 AM
Post #41 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
And I'll bet you did the hanging directly on the piece and not on the sling that the rope runs on.


I would hope not!

Think about it this way:

Think about it this way:

I've just finished a penji into a new crack system. An Offwidth/Chimney that I will have to free climb.

I want to do 4 things:

1. minimize rope drag by making the rope path as straight as possible, because climbing OWs and Chimneys are bad enough without making things worse by having the rope make a huge "Z"

2. keep the piece from lifting out.

3. protect myself as early as I can without creating a lot of rope drag

4. dump any pieces I have not used to that point which I won't likely need. because this rack weighs about 30 pounds, and OWs and chimneys are bad enough without dragging 20 pounds of un-needed gear up the thing with me.

If I clip the rack onto my extension sling, the rope will make a "Z" creating impossible rope drag, negating any potential beneficial effects from the runners.

If I clip the rack directly to the piece, the rope is free to run in a straight path, while the rack holds the piece in place.

I don't use "trad draws" whatever those are. I use full "shoulder length" runners, large enough to loop over my shoulder, bandolier style. Or double-length, enough to loop over my shoulder when doubled. In this case, I used one double-length runner plus one single-length runner in series clipped to the piece, to straighten the rope path as much as possible.

Would it have held a fall? absolutely. Even a fall from 60 feet above the piece, as I neared the belay.

But still, I'd rather not fall. And I didn't.

Brutus

Ok... I apologise. I didn't read your last post properly. The pendulum obviously makes things significantly different, since this puts the penultimate piece above your last one. In this case, more than just friction is pulling the piece upwards - all the tension in the rope also contributes. In this case, weighing down the rope end of the sling would be a pretty silly idea :oops: for the reasons you pointed out.

However, for more conventional climbing where the last piece is the top piece, I stand by my earlier post. Both from a theoretical standpoint and from observing what happened in the (few) times I have used it, this technique works.

Incidentally, the term "trad draw" was common in the group I started climbing with, and as it suggests, simply refers to a quickdraw put together for trad, rather than sport purposes. Consequently, the sling is fairly long - at least a foot, up to tripled shoulder-length.


dbarandiaran


Jun 11, 2005, 11:47 PM
Post #42 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 29, 2003
Posts: 113

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ok back to the original subject, flaring placements. Three pages of posts and no one has mentioned placing a nut or hex endwise. I can't believe it! I know not all nuts and hexes are designed this way, but mine ( bd and DMM nuts, WC hexes) all are tapered twice, to accomodate flaring placements. Take a look at your passive pro from the top...


mrtristan


Jun 11, 2005, 11:54 PM
Post #43 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 21, 2002
Posts: 596

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I love my HB Offsets.


dbarandiaran


Jun 12, 2005, 12:01 AM
Post #44 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 29, 2003
Posts: 113

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ok I didn't know about HB offsets, those look pretty cool! but anyway, like I said, if you turn your nut 90 degrees from the typical placement, most (not all) nuts have this offset taper built in. Voila! flaring placement solved! oh yea, one last disclaimer, an endwise nut does not have as much metal touching the rock, so consider this and make sure you have maximum contact between nut and rock. This is especially true with the smaller nuts, my DMM's have two strength ratings for the smallest nuts, one for standard placement and one for endwise placements.


bvb


Jun 12, 2005, 2:36 AM
Post #45 of 45 (6121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 3, 2003
Posts: 954

Re: Placement in Flaring Cracks [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I ran into a flaring crack that I couldn't work out decent protection
get a younger girlfreind, n00b. the older "cracks" are always loose or flared.

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Trad Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook