Forums: Rockclimbing.com: Suggestions & Feedback:
No Embedded Images - A real loss?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Suggestions & Feedback

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All


Partner kimgraves


Nov 13, 2006, 5:37 PM
Post #1 of 136 (7149 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 13, 2003
Posts: 1186

No Embedded Images - A real loss?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hi Gang,

This is not a bug - it's a feature. The new site does NOT allow embedding images in treads - for performance issues. I feel this is a real loss to the look and feel of the site. Images for trip reports; explanation of technical issues; "the girls of RC.com" are all gone.

If you feel the same way, post up here. Maybe we can convince the new powers to restore this functionality.

Best, Kim

PS: I tried to start a poll, but there's a bug.


(This post was edited by kimgraves on Nov 13, 2006, 5:40 PM)


veganboyjosh


Nov 13, 2006, 5:41 PM
Post #2 of 136 (7116 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 22, 2003
Posts: 1421

Re: [kimgraves] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

no more worst pictures thread?

a shame, i think.

if the performance issues were based on photos being posted, (i assume by "imbedded pics" you mean photos posted in threads, if i'm wrong, forgive/ignore me) why wasn't it brought up before the switch.


Partner robdotcalm


Nov 13, 2006, 5:43 PM
Post #3 of 136 (7109 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1027

Re: [kimgraves] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Hi Gang,

This is not a bug - it's a feature. The new site does NOT allow embedding images in treads - for performance issues. I feel this is a real loss to the look and feel of the site. Images for trip reports; explanation of technical issues; "the girls of RC.com" are all gone.

If you feel the same way, post up here. Maybe we can convince the new powers to restore this functionality.

Best, Kim

PS: I tried to start a poll, but there's a bug.

I agree. Significant loss.


Partner the_mitt


Nov 13, 2006, 5:44 PM
Post #4 of 136 (7105 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 17, 2006
Posts: 279

Re: [kimgraves] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I agree with you. Some cool new improvements. But no real speed increase and allot of missing features like no pics. In my opinion not an improvement. Site is more sucky when it was supposed to suck less. although there is a very big increase in advertisement space. I am sure google ads will be happy with the changes.

Mitt


Partner kimgraves


Nov 13, 2006, 5:45 PM
Post #5 of 136 (7101 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 13, 2003
Posts: 1186

Re: [veganboyjosh] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
(i assume by "imbedded pics" you mean photos posted in threads, if i'm wrong, forgive/ignore me)

That's correct. You can't have an image in a thread.


shogun


Nov 13, 2006, 5:54 PM
Post #6 of 136 (7082 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 11, 2002
Posts: 107

Re: [kimgraves] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

pictures are worth a thousand words... with out it this site just got closer to becoming... well... worthless.

off to taco i go...


saxfiend


Nov 13, 2006, 6:04 PM
Post #7 of 136 (7054 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: [kimgraves] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Agreed. Pictures in trip reports are what make them worth reading.

Please restore this functionality, mods!

JL


Partner thespider


Nov 13, 2006, 6:04 PM
Post #8 of 136 (7052 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 471

Re: [kimgraves] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I am very disappointed with the new site. Loosing images is just one of the let downs. I hope it will improve on this new and better platform...Unsure


unabonger


Nov 13, 2006, 6:06 PM
Post #9 of 136 (7044 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 8, 2003
Posts: 2689

Re: [saxfiend] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

That sucks huge. Bring it back.


notch


Nov 13, 2006, 6:11 PM
Post #10 of 136 (7022 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 599

Re: [unabonger] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

No photos in threads greatly reduces the fun. That may be a trade off I'm not willing to make.


jcasper


Nov 13, 2006, 6:18 PM
Post #11 of 136 (7000 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2005
Posts: 108

Re: [saxfiend] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I agree, bring embedded pictures back to the forums!!

In reply to:
Agreed. Pictures in trip reports are what make them worth
reading.

btw, Trip Reports are now Articles, which appear to accept pictures.


quadfire


Nov 13, 2006, 6:23 PM
Post #12 of 136 (6987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 13, 2006
Posts: 203

Re: [notch] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Seems you can attach a photo and then display it but this would suck if you merely wish to display someone else's photo that is already onnthe internet somewhere.


Well hell the inline thing worked when I previewed it MadPirate


(This post was edited by quadfire on Nov 13, 2006, 6:31 PM)
Attachments: 287271-largest_marshall_loveslave.jpg (228 KB)


chanceboarder


Nov 13, 2006, 6:28 PM
Post #13 of 136 (6975 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 6, 2003
Posts: 1348

Re: [quadfire] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I agree bring back the embedded photos. That is a serious loss to the forums.Mad

The photo critique forums going to suck with out it!

Jason


(This post was edited by chanceboarder on Nov 13, 2006, 6:43 PM)


anykineclimb


Nov 13, 2006, 6:31 PM
Post #14 of 136 (6956 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 30, 2003
Posts: 3593

Re: [chanceboarder] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

please bring it back!
trip reports, rack photos, girls of rc all will not be the same!


deltav


Nov 13, 2006, 6:32 PM
Post #15 of 136 (6955 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 597

Re: [chanceboarder] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Bring back the pics damnit...Mad


nikegirl


Nov 13, 2006, 6:43 PM
Post #16 of 136 (6925 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 2, 2001
Posts: 5662

Re: [deltav] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

very sad !

pics are a must.


:(

~T


lena_chita
Moderator

Nov 13, 2006, 6:48 PM
Post #17 of 136 (6911 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [nikegirl] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah, I can live with all the other changes, but I want embedded photo option!


dingus


Nov 13, 2006, 6:51 PM
Post #18 of 136 (6906 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [nikegirl] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post



No images in posts?

What, is this USENET? Didjyall forget what the internets are for?

DMT


wjca


Nov 13, 2006, 6:51 PM
Post #19 of 136 (6902 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7545

Re: [nikegirl] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It might not be that bad. There were a lot of people that would post really inappropriate and down right disgusting pictures on the old site. This might be a fresh change of pace.


Partner brent_e


Nov 13, 2006, 6:51 PM
Post #20 of 136 (6902 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: [saxfiend] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

definitely a loss.

Definitely.


chanceboarder


Nov 13, 2006, 6:52 PM
Post #21 of 136 (6903 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 6, 2003
Posts: 1348

Re: [quadfire] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Seems you can attach a photo and then display it but this would suck if you merely wish to display someone else's photo that is already onnthe internet somewhere.


Well hell the inline thing worked when I previewed it MadPirate
Isn't having to up load the photo again for each post just going to load up some server somewhere with more photos. Wouldn't just embedding the images like we used to do and have the photo being hosted somewhere else save space?

Correct me if I'm wrong but if I want to upload a photo to my profile and then I want to display that photo in one of my post, I have to upload it again in the post itself? Doesn't that just mean I uploaded the photo twice and taken up more space on the RC.com server somewhere?

Jason


qdiggety


Nov 13, 2006, 6:57 PM
Post #22 of 136 (6882 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 2, 2004
Posts: 808

Re: [wjca] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
It might not be that bad. There were a lot of people that would post really inappropriate and down right disgusting pictures on the old site. This might be a fresh change of pace.

It looks like WJCA's mom is using his computer again.....


cchildre


Nov 13, 2006, 7:00 PM
Post #23 of 136 (6872 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 5, 2004
Posts: 671

Re: [kimgraves] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Need to get images back if we can....a real downer....the best thread was worst photos of RC.com....arrrhhh!


Partner j_ung


Nov 13, 2006, 7:01 PM
Post #24 of 136 (6867 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [kimgraves] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I also miss that funcionality, but consider that the vast majority of embedded photos on RC.com are actually thefts of other sites' bandwidth.

And to anybody who feels that the first day is enough to warrant you leaving and not coming back... b-bye. The performance is far superior, there are a lot of new things to explore and we were all warned that this is very much a process, not a one-time switch and BAM done -- on to the next project. So, leave if you must. Best of luck.


glowering


Nov 13, 2006, 7:08 PM
Post #25 of 136 (6841 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2002
Posts: 386

Re: [kimgraves] No Embedded Images - A real loss? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Na na, na na na na, na na na....


GOODBYE!!

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Rockclimbing.com : Suggestions & Feedback

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook