|
snoopy138
Jun 14, 2008, 5:02 AM
Post #88526 of 97182
(2109 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992
|
tripperjm wrote: Now that the king of nothing is here, maybe he will figure it out and come to the same conclusion as I did.
no idea. is death wish 2005 the route you fell on your back from?
and route you would go back and climb regularly ... travesty? I didn't see anything that was listed as 12d that you had 12c in the description.
I did see that jay gave lethal weapon a rating of 12c even though it's listed as 12d.
and they'll probably approve the change once the area admin looks at it.
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Jun 14, 2008, 5:05 AM
Post #88527 of 97182
(2105 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
lethal weapon.
I'm getting too old for this shit!
|
|
|
|
|
bender
Jun 16, 2008, 6:10 AM
Post #88528 of 97182
(2086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 23, 2002
Posts: 188
|
caughtinside wrote: lethal weapon. I'm getting too old for this shit!
so youve bought into a secure living community and have moved onto maximizing your dollar in poly leisure wear
|
|
|
|
|
bender
Jun 16, 2008, 6:15 AM
Post #88529 of 97182
(2084 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 23, 2002
Posts: 188
|
snoopy138 wrote: tripperjm wrote: Now that the king of nothing is here, maybe he will figure it out and come to the same conclusion as I did. I did see that jay gave lethal weapon a rating of 12c even though it's listed as 12d.
anyone whod argue over a letter is a jock or wears a pleated skirt
or is a nearly graying malcontent who would rather be eitherof them
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Jun 16, 2008, 10:55 PM
Post #88530 of 97182
(1941 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
So very sad, no wild accusations... no slanderous speculation, no going two far? WTF is rong with you guys? There was plenty to work with... I'm so disapointed. I'm still bummed that some spraylord meatbombzed my rating. Still haven't heard back about my attempt to change the rating back to it correct rating.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Jun 16, 2008, 11:07 PM
Post #88531 of 97182
(1934 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
tripperjm wrote: So very sad, no wild accusations... no slanderous speculation, no going two far? WTF is rong with you guys? There was plenty to work with... I'm so disapointed. I'm still bummed that some spraylord meatbombzed my rating. Still haven't heard back about my attempt to change the rating back to it correct rating.
Shut the fuck up Jack, you're too damn old to remember what the ratings used to be anyway. The spray lord was probibly correct, people we're just entertaining your delusional ratings so they would have to listen to you bitch about it. You're washed up old man, move on to Bingo.
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Jun 16, 2008, 11:32 PM
Post #88532 of 97182
(1929 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: tripperjm wrote: So very sad, no wild accusations... no slanderous speculation, no going two far? WTF is rong with you guys? There was plenty to work with... I'm so disapointed. I'm still bummed that some spraylord meatbombzed my rating. Still haven't heard back about my attempt to change the rating back to it correct rating. Shut the fuck up Jack, you're too damn old to remember what the ratings used to be anyway. The spray lord was probibly correct, people we're just entertaining your delusional ratings so they would have to listen to you bitch about it. You're washed up old man, move on to Bingo.
Don't have to remember, in the guide book it is correctly rated, though in this case, since it is a well known and done route.... It wasn't really to hard for even me to remember the rating.
Now if I were to give you my best guess who the spraylord is... and the spraylord in correct, I thing you just agreed with one of your arch enemies.
Well it's true, I'm a washed up old man. Can't climb a lick, never could. Still any time you think you are ready to try to outclimb me, let me know. You pick the style, the area, and the routes. Even with a number grade handycap... I'll still bout you.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Jun 16, 2008, 11:45 PM
Post #88533 of 97182
(1925 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
tripperjm wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: tripperjm wrote: So very sad, no wild accusations... no slanderous speculation, no going two far? WTF is rong with you guys? There was plenty to work with... I'm so disapointed. I'm still bummed that some spraylord meatbombzed my rating. Still haven't heard back about my attempt to change the rating back to it correct rating. Shut the fuck up Jack, you're too damn old to remember what the ratings used to be anyway. The spray lord was probibly correct, people we're just entertaining your delusional ratings so they would have to listen to you bitch about it. You're washed up old man, move on to Bingo. Don't have to remember, in the guide book it is correctly rated, though in this case, since it is a well known and done route.... It wasn't really to hard for even me to remember the rating. Now if I were to give you my best guess who the spraylord is... and the spraylord in correct, I thing you just agreed with one of your arch enemies. Well it's true, I'm a washed up old man. Can't climb a lick, never could. Still any time you think you are ready to try to outclimb me, let me know. You pick the style, the area, and the routes. Even with a number grade handycap... I'll still bout you.
Goddammit. Now I have to go back and read your posts so I know what the hell we're talking about.
Agreeing with one of my arch enemies? That's not good. Damn, a predicament: Agree with an arch enemy, or Jack. Tough call, gonna have to think about this one.
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Jun 17, 2008, 12:05 AM
Post #88534 of 97182
(1925 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: tripperjm wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: tripperjm wrote: So very sad, no wild accusations... no slanderous speculation, no going two far? WTF is rong with you guys? There was plenty to work with... I'm so disapointed. I'm still bummed that some spraylord meatbombzed my rating. Still haven't heard back about my attempt to change the rating back to it correct rating. Shut the fuck up Jack, you're too damn old to remember what the ratings used to be anyway. The spray lord was probibly correct, people we're just entertaining your delusional ratings so they would have to listen to you bitch about it. You're washed up old man, move on to Bingo. Don't have to remember, in the guide book it is correctly rated, though in this case, since it is a well known and done route.... It wasn't really to hard for even me to remember the rating. Now if I were to give you my best guess who the spraylord is... and the spraylord in correct, I thing you just agreed with one of your arch enemies. Well it's true, I'm a washed up old man. Can't climb a lick, never could. Still any time you think you are ready to try to outclimb me, let me know. You pick the style, the area, and the routes. Even with a number grade handycap... I'll still bout you. Goddammit. Now I have to go back and read your posts so I know what the hell we're talking about. Agreeing with one of my arch enemies? That's not good. Damn, a predicament: Agree with an arch enemy, or Jack. Tough call, gonna have to think about this one.
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Jun 17, 2008, 12:09 AM
Post #88535 of 97182
(1922 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
snoopy138 wrote: tripperjm wrote: Now that the king of nothing is here, maybe he will figure it out and come to the same conclusion as I did. no idea. is death wish 2005 the route you fell on your back from? and route you would go back and climb regularly ... travesty? I didn't see anything that was listed as 12d that you had 12c in the description. I did see that jay gave lethal weapon a rating of 12c even though it's listed as 12d. and they'll probably approve the change once the area admin looks at it.
Got dropped to the deck on the Death Wish 2005 the weekend before I did the ffa. Got dropped to the deck the next year on the Lethal Weapon. Different belayers, same belay device.... fuking belayers! You would think that they could at least pay attention while I try the crux.
There is a list of difficult climbs that I go back to. When we are not doing new routes we pick daily projects off the list.
I saw that two... I think it's a trick.
Haven't heard back yet.
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Jun 17, 2008, 12:23 AM
Post #88536 of 97182
(1919 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
Fuking inbreds... had a bunch of stuff, drill, cash, handgun, bag of bolts, sleeping bag, down jacket, tons of clothes.... and a bunch of other stuff. All they took was a cheap pair of thaibans. Probibly cost 40+ bauht. Lenses were totaly fuked up. Got to buy a window but I probibly got lucky.
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Jun 17, 2008, 12:30 AM
Post #88537 of 97182
(1916 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: tripperjm wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: tripperjm wrote: So very sad, no wild accusations... no slanderous speculation, no going two far? WTF is rong with you guys? There was plenty to work with... I'm so disapointed. I'm still bummed that some spraylord meatbombzed my rating. Still haven't heard back about my attempt to change the rating back to it correct rating. Shut the fuck up Jack, you're too damn old to remember what the ratings used to be anyway. The spray lord was probibly correct, people we're just entertaining your delusional ratings so they would have to listen to you bitch about it. You're washed up old man, move on to Bingo. Don't have to remember, in the guide book it is correctly rated, though in this case, since it is a well known and done route.... It wasn't really to hard for even me to remember the rating. Now if I were to give you my best guess who the spraylord is... and the spraylord in correct, I thing you just agreed with one of your arch enemies. Well it's true, I'm a washed up old man. Can't climb a lick, never could. Still any time you think you are ready to try to outclimb me, let me know. You pick the style, the area, and the routes. Even with a number grade handycap... I'll still bout you. Goddammit. Now I have to go back and read your posts so I know what the hell we're talking about. Agreeing with one of my arch enemies? That's not good. Damn, a predicament: Agree with an arch enemy, or Jack. Tough call, gonna have to think about this one.
Well don't hurt yourself... thinking can cause your brain to explode. Don't really want that. Just agree with me and everything will be OK.
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Jun 17, 2008, 12:35 AM
Post #88538 of 97182
(1913 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: tripperjm wrote: So very sad, no wild accusations... no slanderous speculation, no going two far? WTF is rong with you guys? There was plenty to work with... I'm so disapointed. I'm still bummed that some spraylord meatbombzed my rating. Still haven't heard back about my attempt to change the rating back to it correct rating. Shut the fuck up Jack, you're too damn old to remember what the ratings used to be anyway. The spray lord was probibly correct, people we're just entertaining your delusional ratings so they would have to listen to you bitch about it. You're washed up old man, move on to Bingo.
Almost forgot... When I figure it's time... I won't be moving on to bingo or any other weke activity. I'll be going on a shooting spree. Already have a list going and of course I've been stockpiling wepons and ammo. You're on the list just not at the top... but you are moving up fast.
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Jun 17, 2008, 12:37 AM
Post #88539 of 97182
(1910 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
bender wrote: caughtinside wrote: lethal weapon. I'm getting too old for this shit! so youve bought into a secure living community and have moved onto maximizing your dollar in poly leisure wear
He has a pink couch already.
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Jun 17, 2008, 12:40 AM
Post #88540 of 97182
(1907 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
bender wrote: snoopy138 wrote: tripperjm wrote: Now that the king of nothing is here, maybe he will figure it out and come to the same conclusion as I did. I did see that jay gave lethal weapon a rating of 12c even though it's listed as 12d. anyone whod argue over a letter is a jock or wears a pleated skirt or is a nearly graying malcontent who would rather be eitherof them
Well I guess bender know who it is.
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Jun 17, 2008, 12:45 AM
Post #88541 of 97182
(1905 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
caughtinside wrote: lethal weapon. I'm getting too old for this shit!
So CI which shit are you getting two old for?
Remembering what was said? Keeping up? Posting? Slander? pc++? 100k? Climbing? Work? Women? Or just living?
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jun 17, 2008, 1:09 AM
Post #88542 of 97182
(1894 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
tripperjm wrote: snoopy138 wrote: tripperjm wrote: Now that the king of nothing is here, maybe he will figure it out and come to the same conclusion as I did. no idea. is death wish 2005 the route you fell on your back from? and route you would go back and climb regularly ... travesty? I didn't see anything that was listed as 12d that you had 12c in the description. I did see that jay gave lethal weapon a rating of 12c even though it's listed as 12d. and they'll probably approve the change once the area admin looks at it. Got dropped to the deck on the Death Wish 2005 the weekend before I did the ffa. Got dropped to the deck the next year on the Lethal Weapon. Different belayers, same belay device.... fuking belayers! You would think that they could at least pay attention while I try the crux. There is a list of difficult climbs that I go back to. When we are not doing new routes we pick daily projects off the list. I saw that two... I think it's a trick. Haven't heard back yet.
Dude, if you entered the route in the database, then you entered it as 12d. No one has been able to edit route data since the skydivers took over the web site.
Jay
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Jun 17, 2008, 1:18 AM
Post #88543 of 97182
(1881 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
jt512 wrote: tripperjm wrote: snoopy138 wrote: tripperjm wrote: Now that the king of nothing is here, maybe he will figure it out and come to the same conclusion as I did. no idea. is death wish 2005 the route you fell on your back from? and route you would go back and climb regularly ... travesty? I didn't see anything that was listed as 12d that you had 12c in the description. I did see that jay gave lethal weapon a rating of 12c even though it's listed as 12d. and they'll probably approve the change once the area admin looks at it. Got dropped to the deck on the Death Wish 2005 the weekend before I did the ffa. Got dropped to the deck the next year on the Lethal Weapon. Different belayers, same belay device.... fuking belayers! You would think that they could at least pay attention while I try the crux. There is a list of difficult climbs that I go back to. When we are not doing new routes we pick daily projects off the list. I saw that two... I think it's a trick. Haven't heard back yet. Dude, if you entered the route in the database, then you entered it as 12d. No one has been able to edit route data since the skydivers took over the web site. Jay
u r rong. I entered it as 12c. If you look at the Lethal Rock page that I also entered, I rate it 12c. It's been 12c since it was established, still should be.
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Jun 17, 2008, 1:35 AM
Post #88544 of 97182
(1875 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
tripperjm wrote: Well it's true, I'm a washed up old man. Can't climb a lick, never could. Still any time you think you are ready to try to outclimb me, let me know. You pick the style, the area, and the routes. Even with a number grade handycap... I'll still bout you.
If this results in AB doing teh grots dance and crying the reel tearz, well then I am all for it.
|
|
|
|
|
epoch
Moderator
Jun 17, 2008, 1:59 AM
Post #88545 of 97182
(1868 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163
|
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Jun 17, 2008, 3:01 AM
Post #88546 of 97182
(1859 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
tripperjm wrote: caughtinside wrote: lethal weapon. I'm getting too old for this shit! So CI which shit are you getting two old for? Remembering what was said? Keeping up? Posting? Slander? pc++? 100k? Climbing? Work? Women? Or just living?
Sorry Jack, I forget you are too lazy to hang out in the Grupe. Where you could have heard about my weekend glory. I onsighted an .11d at Mickey's with a couple hangs, and then redpointed it half hour later with just one hang.
I tried the Sex Porposise too, but it turns out you actually have to know how to climb to get up that one so naturally I got bouted.
Other than that, I have been crushing holds to dust in the gym and spraying about it on grupe, I spent the afternoon abusing zeke about tricams in grupe, and i've been working a lady on the side.
You know how it is. It isn't easy trying to take over the world!
Meanwhile, got all these rumors flying around. You know, Jack's old, Jack can't climb any more, Jack's thinking about hanging up his boots. In the back of the closet, next to that other stuff. Well, that's what I heard!!
Didn't know about the stockpile of munitions until just now though. But if you could do me a small personal favor it would be to move Snupe up to the top of that list you mentioned. I'd appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Jun 17, 2008, 3:04 AM
Post #88547 of 97182
(1858 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
Oh yes, when you go for snupe be sure to aim below the hat and above the shoulders. Double tap, just to be certain.
And my life was nearly claimed by a rogue wave at mickey's. That place is dangerous!!
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Jun 17, 2008, 3:17 AM
Post #88548 of 97182
(1854 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
Man my landlord is just too much. He lives two doors down from me. He's an Iranian guy who chainsmokes, has a real guttural voice.
'hey ahmed, here's my july rent, I'm going to montana for three weeks."
"montana? what you do in montana?"
"oh, you know, fish, drink beer, party."
"No pussy?"
I shake my head.
"What kind of fucking party is it without the pussy? David, David, my friend. It is no party without the pussy."
"Sorry Ahmed. It's out in the middle of nowhere."
Ahmed shakes his head and closes the door.
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Jun 17, 2008, 3:51 AM
Post #88549 of 97182
(1989 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
caughtinside wrote: I spent the afternoon abusing zeke about tricams in grupe, and i've been working a lady on the side.
|
|
|
|
|
snoopy138
Jun 17, 2008, 4:12 AM
Post #88550 of 97182
(1988 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992
|
tripperjm wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: tripperjm wrote: So very sad, no wild accusations... no slanderous speculation, no going two far? WTF is rong with you guys? There was plenty to work with... I'm so disapointed. I'm still bummed that some spraylord meatbombzed my rating. Still haven't heard back about my attempt to change the rating back to it correct rating. Shut the fuck up Jack, you're too damn old to remember what the ratings used to be anyway. The spray lord was probibly correct, people we're just entertaining your delusional ratings so they would have to listen to you bitch about it. You're washed up old man, move on to Bingo. Don't have to remember, in the guide book it is correctly rated, though in this case, since it is a well known and done route.... It wasn't really to hard for even me to remember the rating. Now if I were to give you my best guess who the spraylord is... and the spraylord in correct, I thing you just agreed with one of your arch enemies. Well it's true, I'm a washed up old man. Can't climb a lick, never could. Still any time you think you are ready to try to outclimb me, let me know. You pick the style, the area, and the routes. Even with a number grade handycap... I'll still bout you.
arch enemies of AB? I'm confident its not renob or happiegrrl. maybe murf? I no AB does want too cutz his rope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [tripperjm] CI's sulking thread....
[
