Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Trad Climbing:
Protecting hard laybacks?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Trad Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All


Partner devkrev


Mar 15, 2009, 10:15 PM
Post #26 of 55 (1656 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 28, 2004
Posts: 933

Re: [kane_schutzman] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
1. That route looks like garbage with a capital G, and a pronounced B, and GGGGGGG, and the end.

2. I shoot the next person I see jamming a lieback.

What about the next person tick marking gear placements on a top rope?


Johnny_Fang


Mar 15, 2009, 10:31 PM
Post #27 of 55 (1651 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2006
Posts: 289

Re: [kane_schutzman] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
1. That route looks like garbage with a capital G, and a pronounced B, and GGGGGGG, and the end.

2. I shoot the next person I see jamming a lieback.

don't feed the trolls, folks. i do like your sig line, kane.

hey, where is that climb? i've spent a decent amount time at squamish but i can't identify it. it looks fun.


justroberto


Mar 16, 2009, 5:23 AM
Post #28 of 55 (1603 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876

Re: [devkrev] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

devkrev wrote:
kane_schutzman wrote:
My style is to be able to climb another day. I'm not going to compromise my fucking good health just to do a shitty lieback route in good style. OHH god don't chalk up the rock. R U fucking serious?Tongue

Then why lead the climb at all?


dev

Well, what else is he going to do with the 53 cams he bought before he knew how to use them?


rschap


Mar 16, 2009, 5:56 AM
Post #29 of 55 (1597 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 30, 2005
Posts: 592

Re: [dynoho] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I’m going to have to agree with Angry, especially after seeing the picture. That crack should be taken head on, you are only using the lie back as a crutch and it’s making you weaker. If you’re going to just TR the route climb it however you want, if you’re trying to advance your climbing ability start working on taking it head on the skills you’ll learn will pay off later. Of course that’s just my opinion from the climbing I’ve done, do what you want.


dr_feelgood


Mar 16, 2009, 12:45 PM
Post #30 of 55 (1574 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [kane_schutzman] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
The hell with each and every one of you vegan eatin hippi sons a bitches. Im tick marking every lieback crack I climb from now until I fucking die. Someone else say something smart and I'm going to start racking one of those neon green concrete chalk sticks on my rack. Good day.

Why not just carry a sharpie and write which sized piece you're going to place with several green and red arrows pointing to the proper orientation.
Toolbag.


dr_feelgood


Mar 16, 2009, 12:46 PM
Post #31 of 55 (1573 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [kane_schutzman] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
1. That route looks like garbage with a capital G, and a pronounced B, and GGGGGGG, and the end.

2. I shoot the next person I see jamming a lieback.

Yes, death threats in compensation for poor skill. Real mature.


nthusiastj


Mar 16, 2009, 1:20 PM
Post #32 of 55 (1562 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 3, 2002
Posts: 1994

Re: [mar_leclerc] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mar_leclerc wrote:
It could be jammed theoretically. The problem is that the crack cuts into the face at an angle (not cutting straight into the rock) so one side is a jug and the other is a big sloper. It's pretty easy just to grab the jug and put your feet on the sloper and cruise up. Halfway is gets wider and I just jam it and take a rest, then the crack petters out and it's face holds to the top. The climb is way below my max grade, so I guess I ought to just ball up and go for it...


Heres the route (I know Im pinkpointing, please don't turn this into a hate thread)

[image]http://imglarge.mountainproject.com/106174126_898ee7.jpg[/image]

The key really is to know your cam sizes to your hand and finger sizes as someone has said.
It looks like you can see the whole route from the ground and scope out what gear you want and in what order. Just rack the gear on your harness in order.
Tick marks probably aren't necessary if it's pretty far below your ability. Just take some time to memeorize where you want to place.


Partner j_ung


Mar 16, 2009, 2:06 PM
Post #33 of 55 (1545 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [nthusiastj] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ya know, there are several stages of ticking that fall someplace between none and a ten-inch long, 1/2-inch thick line that looks like it was applied in oil by Michaelangelo. If done responsibly, tick marking doesn't have to be an ethics issue.


thabadcharacter


Mar 16, 2009, 2:19 PM
Post #34 of 55 (1537 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2005
Posts: 52

Re: [j_ung] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey, could be worse- on the Black Roof pitch of the North america Wall/El Nino, there were taped down Post-It notes saying "#3 Camalot, 0.5 Camalot, etc". In very Euro handwriting I might add!


(This post was edited by thabadcharacter on Mar 16, 2009, 4:13 PM)


kane_schutzman


Mar 16, 2009, 3:21 PM
Post #35 of 55 (1512 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 14, 2005
Posts: 896

Re: [justroberto] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

justroberto wrote:
devkrev wrote:
kane_schutzman wrote:
My style is to be able to climb another day. I'm not going to compromise my fucking good health just to do a shitty lieback route in good style. OHH god don't chalk up the rock. R U fucking serious?Tongue

Then why lead the climb at all?


dev

Well, what else is he going to do with the 53 cams he bought before he knew how to use them?
You again? Jesus I swear its like your trying to write my fucking biography or something. Is it bad to have alot of cams? Is it bad I have money coming out of my ass? Your probably right I need to get that checked, its just that Im running out of place to put it.Get a life man!

I've tried the sharpie thing, first off, the rock tears the tips up too easily. The line is too skinny, probably the size of your penis. Also the chalk sticks get into the divits in the rock better.

Mr. Feelgood.


(This post was edited by kane_schutzman on Mar 16, 2009, 3:24 PM)


kane_schutzman


Mar 16, 2009, 3:26 PM
Post #36 of 55 (1506 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 14, 2005
Posts: 896

Re: [kane_schutzman] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think the real problem here is that neither of you climb hard enough to know why tick marks can be useful.


diebetes


Mar 16, 2009, 4:15 PM
Post #37 of 55 (1481 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2007
Posts: 106

Re: [kane_schutzman] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
I think the real problem here is that neither of you climb hard enough to know why tick marks can be useful.

It's pretty self explanatory what purpose tick marks serve. And I mean, if you know what they're good for, chances are the rest of the people on here do as well.
I like to keep things friendly, but I gotta say Kane, you're being a big ol bag-o-douche in this thread. Please remedy this.
Also, keep in mind that more than just climbers enjoy rock faces and the areas around them. Sure climbers get used to chalk, but lets face it- if it weren't for climbers, there wouldn't be chalk on the rock to begin with (don't be a smart-ass and point out exceptions provided by nature). Think of something really hate- let's go with vaginas. Imagine how upset you'd be if you had to put up with unwanted vaginas scattering your recreational areas. You'd probably think that the people responsible were selfish. You'd be right.
Keep chalk to a minimum.


Tipton


Mar 16, 2009, 4:25 PM
Post #38 of 55 (1477 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2007
Posts: 272

Re: [kane_schutzman] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
I think the real problem here is that neither of you climb hard enough to know why tick marks can be useful.

I think the real problem here is that you haven't climbed long enough to know why tick marks can be a pain.


brownie710


Mar 16, 2009, 5:03 PM
Post #39 of 55 (1464 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 25, 2007
Posts: 531

Re: [kane_schutzman] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
The hell with each and every one of you vegan eatin hippi sons a bitches. Im tick marking every lieback crack I climb from now until I fucking die. Someone else say something smart and I'm going to start racking one of those neon green concrete chalk sticks on my rack. Good day.

I believe this is the adult translation of "I'm taking my marbles and I'm going home!"


md3


Mar 16, 2009, 5:11 PM
Post #40 of 55 (1456 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 13, 2004
Posts: 172

Re: [brownie710] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Off topic as to tick marks -- but maybe its worth mentioning that if you do end up laying something back thats hard for you on lead, its a good time to be wearing a helmet. At least when I have taken falls in those situations, I have sometimes ended up flipping over and falling in less predictable ways than when climbing straight in.


mar_leclerc


Mar 16, 2009, 6:18 PM
Post #41 of 55 (1429 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2008
Posts: 156

Re: [kane_schutzman] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
I think the real problem here is that neither of you climb hard enough to know why tick marks can be useful.

The only time I ever used a tick-mark was on a V9 to find a fotthold around a corner.


mar_leclerc


Mar 16, 2009, 6:20 PM
Post #42 of 55 (1427 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2008
Posts: 156

Re: [Johnny_Fang] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Johnny_Fang wrote:
hey, where is that climb? i've spent a decent amount time at squamish but i can't identify it. it looks fun.

Thats because its at the Harrison Bluffs, near Harison Hot Springs, a couple hours East of Squamish. The crack the right is like our local 'Crime of the Century'...


sungam


Mar 16, 2009, 6:20 PM
Post #43 of 55 (1425 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [mar_leclerc] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mar_leclerc wrote:
kane_schutzman wrote:
I think the real problem here is that neither of you climb hard enough to know why tick marks can be useful.

The only time I ever used a tick-mark was on a V9 to find a fotthold around a corner.
Spiritual crimez!!!!11one1
Banz him now! NOW!


caliclimbergrl


Mar 16, 2009, 9:00 PM
Post #44 of 55 (1388 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 19, 2008
Posts: 354

Re: [angry] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

angry wrote:
There are some exceptions I can think of. That said, I've climbed thousands of cracks at all grades.

If I were to chart it all out I bet that the layback is the "better" or "easier" way maybe 2% of the time.

For the sake of argument, lets say it's 10%. That leaves you with 90% of crack routes working better with pure jamming techniques and not laybacks.

I'd say that would be the ideal skillset to follow a strict dogma of techniques. Even on the laybacks, you still place your pro off jams then return to laybacks once you're ready to climb again.

I agree with you. My first thought when I read the OP was, "Why in the world would you layback a splitter?! There are plenty of cracks that you need to layback. But they're usually corner cracks -- almost never splitters.

And seeing the picture confirms that for me -- yeah, it's a bit of an awkward angle, but it looks like granite so you could jam one foot and smear the other. Looks like a jam crack to me!


caliclimbergrl


Mar 16, 2009, 9:03 PM
Post #45 of 55 (1386 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 19, 2008
Posts: 354

Re: [Tipton] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Tipton wrote:

Tick marks suck. They are so much more obvious than a chalked hold and don't clean nearly as easy. If your good health is at risk, then you shouldn't be leading the route.

I'm sure this is true in a lot of places, but it looks like he's in British Columbia. It rains pretty much constantly 9 months a year there and usually at least once a month for at least several days straight even in the summer. Tick marks aren't a problem up there.


Tipton


Mar 16, 2009, 9:35 PM
Post #46 of 55 (1373 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2007
Posts: 272

Re: [caliclimbergrl] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

caliclimbergrl wrote:
Tipton wrote:

Tick marks suck. They are so much more obvious than a chalked hold and don't clean nearly as easy. If your good health is at risk, then you shouldn't be leading the route.

I'm sure this is true in a lot of places, but it looks like he's in British Columbia. It rains pretty much constantly 9 months a year there and usually at least once a month for at least several days straight even in the summer. Tick marks aren't a problem up there.

I suppose that might be the case. But for the person who jumps on the route an hour after you, they are still an annoyance.

Personally, I think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. I mean, is it really that hard to remember what goes where? If you've already inspected it and worked out the placements on top rope, then why can't you just rack the pieces in the appropriate order and remember where to put them?


caliclimbergrl


Mar 16, 2009, 9:39 PM
Post #47 of 55 (1371 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 19, 2008
Posts: 354

Re: [Tipton] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 
Tick marks suck. They are so much more obvious than a chalked hold and don't clean nearly as easy. If your good health is at risk, then you shouldn't be leading the route.[/quote]

I'm sure this is true in a lot of places, but it looks like he's in British Columbia. It rains pretty much constantly 9 months a year there and usually at least once a month for at least several days straight even in the summer. Tick marks aren't a problem up there.[/quote]

I suppose that might be the case. But for the person who jumps on the route an hour after you, they are still an annoyance.

Personally, I think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. I mean, is it really that hard to remember what goes where? If you've already inspected it and worked out the placements on top rope, then why can't you just rack the pieces in the appropriate order and remember where to put them?[/quote]

I don't know -- personally, I wouldn't feel comfortable placing gear blind. I wouldn't trust my memory. Actually, I'm not entirely sure I'd trust tick marks either. Just because you're placing the right size piece in the right place doesn't mean it's well placed! If I couldn't at least get jams for gear placement, I wouldn't lead that crack. But it wouldn't really bother me to climb it with tick marks on it.


hafilax


Mar 16, 2009, 9:50 PM
Post #48 of 55 (1360 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [mar_leclerc] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mar_leclerc wrote:
It could be jammed theoretically. The problem is that the crack cuts into the face at an angle (not cutting straight into the rock) so one side is a jug and the other is a big sloper. It's pretty easy just to grab the jug and put your feet on the sloper and cruise up. Halfway is gets wider and I just jam it and take a rest, then the crack petters out and it's face holds to the top. The climb is way below my max grade, so I guess I ought to just ball up and go for it...


Heres the route (I know Im pinkpointing, please don't turn this into a hate thread)

My strategy based on that photo would be to look for good left foot holds and good right foot smears to get a kind of stemming effect then lock off with the right hand placing gear at the waist with the left. If you can get a good finger lock and a good foot jam you're solid.


Partner camhead


Mar 16, 2009, 9:55 PM
Post #49 of 55 (1358 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [kane_schutzman] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
I think the real problem here is that neither of you climb hard enough to know why tick marks can be useful.

heh.

hey, do I climb hard enough to have an opinion on ticks? Because I do think they are kind of lame.

To the OP, laybacking is a good skill to have and pull out for the very rare occurrences that you actually need it. get to know how to gauge gear size by the type of lock you are using, or how far your finger is going into the crack. but even still, you will rarely place gear on layback.


kane_schutzman


Mar 16, 2009, 11:34 PM
Post #50 of 55 (1332 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 14, 2005
Posts: 896

Re: [camhead] Protecting hard laybacks? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Frankly the best thing about this deal is that I'm not sure I've ever even placed a tick mark. Still I will defend them in some instances. I have bigger things to worry about, tick marks don't annoy me, I pass them by. Wow, well this was fun guys.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Trad Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook