Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Trad Climbing:
First fall on gear
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Trad Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 Next page Last page  View All


moose_droppings


Aug 2, 2009, 5:57 PM
Post #51 of 116 (4820 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [ACJ] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Yeah, he had an accident with his gear failing.

DuH


ACJ


Aug 2, 2009, 6:03 PM
Post #52 of 116 (4811 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2008
Posts: 162

Re: [moose_droppings] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah from what I hear he left his rig out in the rain and snow for a month and then took about a 900 foot fall on it (not sure about those exact details).

His rope broke right? So how does that have anything to do with falling on trad gear?


moose_droppings


Aug 2, 2009, 6:06 PM
Post #53 of 116 (4807 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [moose_droppings] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Purposely falling (jumping) onto his gear (don't tell me rope isn't gear). And he was a pro at this.
By the way, rope cutting wasn't on your list, was it?

Shit happens!


ACJ


Aug 2, 2009, 6:07 PM
Post #54 of 116 (4802 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2008
Posts: 162

Re: [ACJ] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

After a quick search it appears that his ropes got tangled while taking one of his controlled free fall jumps and melted and cut. For the record I don't think you should take any falls that big on your trad gear.


ACJ


Aug 2, 2009, 6:11 PM
Post #55 of 116 (4795 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2008
Posts: 162

Re: [moose_droppings] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

So again, he wasn't rock climbing, he was doing a completely different activity, using the gear for something it wasn't made for. Trad gear and the ropes are made to hold falls.

Again I said use your judgement when you take falls. I didn't say find a sharp edge and fold your rope over it and then take a big whip.

The straws you are grasping at are awfully small. I wouldn't fall on those either.


moose_droppings


Aug 2, 2009, 6:30 PM
Post #56 of 116 (4786 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [ACJ] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

ACJ wrote:
So again, he wasn't rock climbing, he was doing a completely different activity, using the gear for something it wasn't made for. Trad gear and the ropes are made to hold falls.

Different activity, like taking a fall on climbing gear??? Less of a FF on that one than you can take climbing though.

ACJ wrote:
I didn't say find a sharp edge and fold your rope over it and then take a big whip.
Because you didn't think of the rope in your list till it was pointed out. Doesn't take a big whip either.

" wrote:
The straws you are grasping at are awfully small.

With a narrow view they would be.


AntinJ


Aug 2, 2009, 6:48 PM
Post #57 of 116 (4770 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 4, 2008
Posts: 475

Re: [moose_droppings] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

At this point, You guys should just exchange numbers and settle this one over the phone...


ACJ


Aug 2, 2009, 6:50 PM
Post #58 of 116 (4768 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2008
Posts: 162

Re: [moose_droppings] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Your argument is transparent and getting old. I'm moving on after this.

Free falling 900 feet doesn't happen in climbing so you are talking about forces and systems that are unrelated.

I'm not writing a list to have you proof read it so yeah I mentioned a thing or two. No I didn't write up a lesson plan for anyone on how to do this, nor did I say I was listing everything that was going wrong. My point was solely focused on trad gear such as cams and nuts, (anything else you want to add?). I said judgement, yep that is a very large encompassing word. Anything else I didn't mention throw it in there too. I was not talking about rope systems at any point until you brought them into play in order to strengthen your already failing argument.

Climbing isn't about analyzing everything that could go wrong and then avoiding any chance of risk. If it was then it wouldn't make much sense to climb in my opinion.

The difference between you and I is that I am simply stating a way of doing something that is available to anyone. You are trying to show that I am stupid and wrong and that other people should listen to you. Yet, you have no evidence to back it up. Since I am not trying to tell anyone to do anything the burden of proof falls on you, not me. You have not succeeded in it.

Being pissed hasn't solved any problems I know of. Hopefully you find a system that works in.


csproul


Aug 2, 2009, 6:53 PM
Post #59 of 116 (4763 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [AntinJ] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

AntinJ wrote:
At this point, You guys should just exchange numbers and settle this one over the phone...
Or better yet, Moose should just stfu.


moose_droppings


Aug 2, 2009, 7:23 PM
Post #60 of 116 (4751 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [ACJ] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

ACJ wrote:
Your argument is transparent and getting old. I'm moving on after this.

Free falling 900 feet doesn't happen in climbing so you are talking about forces and systems that are unrelated.

I'm not writing a list to have you proof read it so yeah I mentioned a thing or two. No I didn't write up a lesson plan for anyone on how to do this, nor did I say I was listing everything that was going wrong. My point was solely focused on trad gear such as cams and nuts, (anything else you want to add?). I said judgement, yep that is a very large encompassing word. Anything else I didn't mention throw it in there too. I was not talking about rope systems at any point until you brought them into play in order to strengthen your already failing argument.

Climbing isn't about analyzing everything that could go wrong and then avoiding any chance of risk. If it was then it wouldn't make much sense to climb in my opinion.

The difference between you and I is that I am simply stating a way of doing something that is available to anyone. You are trying to show that I am stupid and wrong and that other people should listen to you. Yet, you have no evidence to back it up. Since I am not trying to tell anyone to do anything the burden of proof falls on you, not me. You have not succeeded in it.

Being pissed hasn't solved any problems I know of. Hopefully you find a system that works in.

Very weak.

Your trying to pass this off as a safe and good thing, Its not. The fact that so far its been OK doesn't tip any scales.

No evidence?? No proof?? There's Dan and a multitude of other climbers that took the chop on gear, without trying to push their gear. Climbing is much about trying to analyze everything you can think of and than minimizing it the best you can. You can't get rid of all the risks of climbing, but there is no sense in inviting any either. When your talking about taking a fall onto gear, guess what, you are talking about roped systems. Dan's setup wasn't instilling abnormal forces as you imply, they are well within forces gear is able to take, quite a bit less actually. He wasn't an idiot, shit happens, he new there were risk. The scary thing about you is you don't see any risk and offer it up to anyone as the thing to do, and that those that see the inherent extra risk in it as being scared of it.


moose_droppings


Aug 2, 2009, 7:26 PM
Post #61 of 116 (4747 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [csproul] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

csproul wrote:
AntinJ wrote:
At this point, You guys should just exchange numbers and settle this one over the phone...
Or better yet, Moose should just stfu.

Let me guess, you two want to be alone.


moose_droppings


Aug 2, 2009, 7:28 PM
Post #62 of 116 (4739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [AntinJ] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

AntinJ wrote:
At this point, You guys should just exchange numbers and settle this one over the phone...

Ding! Ding! Ding!


csproul


Aug 2, 2009, 11:49 PM
Post #63 of 116 (4703 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [moose_droppings] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
ACJ wrote:
Your argument is transparent and getting old. I'm moving on after this.

Free falling 900 feet doesn't happen in climbing so you are talking about forces and systems that are unrelated.

I'm not writing a list to have you proof read it so yeah I mentioned a thing or two. No I didn't write up a lesson plan for anyone on how to do this, nor did I say I was listing everything that was going wrong. My point was solely focused on trad gear such as cams and nuts, (anything else you want to add?). I said judgement, yep that is a very large encompassing word. Anything else I didn't mention throw it in there too. I was not talking about rope systems at any point until you brought them into play in order to strengthen your already failing argument.

Climbing isn't about analyzing everything that could go wrong and then avoiding any chance of risk. If it was then it wouldn't make much sense to climb in my opinion.

The difference between you and I is that I am simply stating a way of doing something that is available to anyone. You are trying to show that I am stupid and wrong and that other people should listen to you. Yet, you have no evidence to back it up. Since I am not trying to tell anyone to do anything the burden of proof falls on you, not me. You have not succeeded in it.

Being pissed hasn't solved any problems I know of. Hopefully you find a system that works in.

Very weak.

Your trying to pass this off as a safe and good thing, Its not. The fact that so far its been OK doesn't tip any scales.

No evidence?? No proof?? There's Dan and a multitude of other climbers that took the chop on gear, without trying to push their gear. Climbing is much about trying to analyze everything you can think of and than minimizing it the best you can. You can't get rid of all the risks of climbing, but there is no sense in inviting any either. When your talking about taking a fall onto gear, guess what, you are talking about roped systems. Dan's setup wasn't instilling abnormal forces as you imply, they are well within forces gear is able to take, quite a bit less actually. He wasn't an idiot, shit happens, he new there were risk. The scary thing about you is you don't see any risk and offer it up to anyone as the thing to do, and that those that see the inherent extra risk in it as being scared of it.
Thanks for the lecture, dad. Climbing is not about minimizing the risk. It is about accurately assessing the risks, deciding whether you find those risks acceptable, making a choice, and accepting the consequences of that decision. ACJ has merely said that he has learned to assess whether a fall is safe or not, assess whether the gear is good, and fall or not fall as HE deems appropriate. Whether this is on purpose, or as a result of climbing to the point of failure is immaterial. If he feels he is able to make these assessments and is willing to accept the consequences of such a choice, good for him. If you aren't capable of telling whether a fall is safe and/or if your gear is good, then don't take the fall. Just don't assume that other climbers don't possess the skills that you do not. It's probably really irresponsible to climb above good gear knowing that there is a low probability of pulling the moves too, huh?


moose_droppings


Aug 3, 2009, 12:56 AM
Post #64 of 116 (4691 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [csproul] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

csproul wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
ACJ wrote:
Your argument is transparent and getting old. I'm moving on after this.

Free falling 900 feet doesn't happen in climbing so you are talking about forces and systems that are unrelated.

I'm not writing a list to have you proof read it so yeah I mentioned a thing or two. No I didn't write up a lesson plan for anyone on how to do this, nor did I say I was listing everything that was going wrong. My point was solely focused on trad gear such as cams and nuts, (anything else you want to add?). I said judgement, yep that is a very large encompassing word. Anything else I didn't mention throw it in there too. I was not talking about rope systems at any point until you brought them into play in order to strengthen your already failing argument.

Climbing isn't about analyzing everything that could go wrong and then avoiding any chance of risk. If it was then it wouldn't make much sense to climb in my opinion.

The difference between you and I is that I am simply stating a way of doing something that is available to anyone. You are trying to show that I am stupid and wrong and that other people should listen to you. Yet, you have no evidence to back it up. Since I am not trying to tell anyone to do anything the burden of proof falls on you, not me. You have not succeeded in it.

Being pissed hasn't solved any problems I know of. Hopefully you find a system that works in.

Very weak.

Your trying to pass this off as a safe and good thing, Its not. The fact that so far its been OK doesn't tip any scales.

No evidence?? No proof?? There's Dan and a multitude of other climbers that took the chop on gear, without trying to push their gear. Climbing is much about trying to analyze everything you can think of and than minimizing it the best you can. You can't get rid of all the risks of climbing, but there is no sense in inviting any either. When your talking about taking a fall onto gear, guess what, you are talking about roped systems. Dan's setup wasn't instilling abnormal forces as you imply, they are well within forces gear is able to take, quite a bit less actually. He wasn't an idiot, shit happens, he new there were risk. The scary thing about you is you don't see any risk and offer it up to anyone as the thing to do, and that those that see the inherent extra risk in it as being scared of it.
Thanks for the lecture, dad. Climbing is not about minimizing the risk. It is about accurately assessing the risks, deciding whether you find those risks acceptable, making a choice, and accepting the consequences of that decision. ACJ has merely said that he has learned to assess whether a fall is safe or not, assess whether the gear is good, and fall or not fall as HE deems appropriate. Whether this is on purpose, or as a result of climbing to the point of failure is immaterial. If he feels he is able to make these assessments and is willing to accept the consequences of such a choice, good for him. If you aren't capable of telling whether a fall is safe and/or if your gear is good, then don't take the fall. Just don't assume that other climbers don't possess the skills that you do not. It's probably really irresponsible to climb above good gear knowing that there is a low probability of pulling the moves too, huh?

Being aware that even perfect looking placements can fail has nothing to do with fear. Its a reality that you can accept or ignore. I can climb above gear knowing this without dwelling on it. Its a risk I'm willing to take, its not a risk I'm willing to push. You can push the odds all you want.

Simply put, you need to advise people of the drawbacks of hucking yourself onto gear if your going to advocate it.


csproul


Aug 3, 2009, 1:24 AM
Post #65 of 116 (4685 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [moose_droppings] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
csproul wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
ACJ wrote:
Your argument is transparent and getting old. I'm moving on after this.

Free falling 900 feet doesn't happen in climbing so you are talking about forces and systems that are unrelated.

I'm not writing a list to have you proof read it so yeah I mentioned a thing or two. No I didn't write up a lesson plan for anyone on how to do this, nor did I say I was listing everything that was going wrong. My point was solely focused on trad gear such as cams and nuts, (anything else you want to add?). I said judgement, yep that is a very large encompassing word. Anything else I didn't mention throw it in there too. I was not talking about rope systems at any point until you brought them into play in order to strengthen your already failing argument.

Climbing isn't about analyzing everything that could go wrong and then avoiding any chance of risk. If it was then it wouldn't make much sense to climb in my opinion.

The difference between you and I is that I am simply stating a way of doing something that is available to anyone. You are trying to show that I am stupid and wrong and that other people should listen to you. Yet, you have no evidence to back it up. Since I am not trying to tell anyone to do anything the burden of proof falls on you, not me. You have not succeeded in it.

Being pissed hasn't solved any problems I know of. Hopefully you find a system that works in.

Very weak.

Your trying to pass this off as a safe and good thing, Its not. The fact that so far its been OK doesn't tip any scales.

No evidence?? No proof?? There's Dan and a multitude of other climbers that took the chop on gear, without trying to push their gear. Climbing is much about trying to analyze everything you can think of and than minimizing it the best you can. You can't get rid of all the risks of climbing, but there is no sense in inviting any either. When your talking about taking a fall onto gear, guess what, you are talking about roped systems. Dan's setup wasn't instilling abnormal forces as you imply, they are well within forces gear is able to take, quite a bit less actually. He wasn't an idiot, shit happens, he new there were risk. The scary thing about you is you don't see any risk and offer it up to anyone as the thing to do, and that those that see the inherent extra risk in it as being scared of it.
Thanks for the lecture, dad. Climbing is not about minimizing the risk. It is about accurately assessing the risks, deciding whether you find those risks acceptable, making a choice, and accepting the consequences of that decision. ACJ has merely said that he has learned to assess whether a fall is safe or not, assess whether the gear is good, and fall or not fall as HE deems appropriate. Whether this is on purpose, or as a result of climbing to the point of failure is immaterial. If he feels he is able to make these assessments and is willing to accept the consequences of such a choice, good for him. If you aren't capable of telling whether a fall is safe and/or if your gear is good, then don't take the fall. Just don't assume that other climbers don't possess the skills that you do not. It's probably really irresponsible to climb above good gear knowing that there is a low probability of pulling the moves too, huh?

Being aware that even perfect looking placements can fail has nothing to do with fear. Its a reality that you can accept or ignore. I can climb above gear knowing this without dwelling on it. Its a risk I'm willing to take, its not a risk I'm willing to push. You can push the odds all you want.

Simply put, you need to advise people of the drawbacks of hucking yourself onto gear if your going to advocate it.
I am not advocating that people indiscriminately huck onto gear. I am advocating that people gain the experience to accurately assess the actual dangers, make a decision whether or not falling is ok, and act appropriately on that decision. If this includes attempting low probability moves above gear or knowing 100% you are going fall, it doesn't really matter, as long as you accept responsibility for your own decision. In fact, experienced climbers routinely fall onto gear (on purpose even!) because they are capable of making such assessments. If you are not confident in your ability to do so, then falling is probably not a good idea. Furthermore, I doubt you are in any position to gauge whether ACJ or most any other climber on this site possesses such ability. BTW, "its" is the possessive pronoun/adjective of the pronoun "it". "It's" is the contraction of "it is".


jt512


Aug 3, 2009, 1:48 AM
Post #66 of 116 (4679 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [jdwynn] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jdwynn wrote:
There is a change in your mental game and confidence in your gear that comes from unplanned falling on your gear (never fall test gear on purpose that is whats suicidal)...

Logically, if it's not suicidal to fall accidentally on gear, then it shouldn't be to fall intentionally on it either.

Jay


moose_droppings


Aug 3, 2009, 2:54 AM
Post #67 of 116 (4661 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [csproul] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Guess I haven't heard of any 'experienced' climbers that routinely take falls onto gear on purpose, doesn't mean that there aren't any of course, just saying.
You can't judge the entire fall or whether it's safe or not if it's born from the idea that your piece won't pull, or the next one. Textbook placements fail from time to time, shit happens, as you've heard me say before. I am confident in saying that no one is capable of judging a 100% of the time that their gear won't pull, to many variables beyond their control. Not scared of that fact, just aware of it, accept it and climb on.

Thanks for the English lesson, its Unsure it's good to know.


cush


Aug 3, 2009, 3:32 PM
Post #68 of 116 (4619 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 2, 2008
Posts: 320

Re: [moose_droppings] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lots of extremely good trad climbers (beth rodden, Didier Berthod, ceder wright, many others i don't feel like typing out) will work hard routes the same way sport climbers will. when doing a really hard ground up ascent part of the experience is to climb, and fall, pull the rope, and try again. i suppose this isn't the same as intentionally taking a fall but they start these climbs knowing full well that they're going to be taking falls onto gear. that's just the nature of the beast.


coolcat83


Aug 3, 2009, 3:48 PM
Post #69 of 116 (4614 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 1007

Re: [cush] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cush wrote:
lots of extremely good trad climbers (beth rodden, Didier Berthod, ceder wright, many others i don't feel like typing out) will work hard routes the same way sport climbers will. when doing a really hard ground up ascent part of the experience is to climb, and fall, pull the rope, and try again. i suppose this isn't the same as intentionally taking a fall but they start these climbs knowing full well that they're going to be taking falls onto gear. that's just the nature of the beast.

and many times they have rapped the route or aided it to see where the gear is and know exactly what to expect.


saxfiend


Aug 3, 2009, 5:48 PM
Post #70 of 116 (4585 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: [moose_droppings] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
purposely taken falls onto gear is flat out stupid.
I'm looking forward to reading your explanation of why gear is more likely to fail in an intentional fall than it is in an accidental one. Since you seem to be pretty good at tortured logic, I'm sure you can come up with something entertaining.

JL


cush


Aug 3, 2009, 8:01 PM
Post #71 of 116 (4554 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 2, 2008
Posts: 320

Re: [coolcat83] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i don't see how this makes my statement any less true? or were you agreeing with me? i couldn't tell if that was support or criticism.


moose_droppings


Aug 4, 2009, 2:16 AM
Post #72 of 116 (4521 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [saxfiend] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

saxfiend wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
purposely taken falls onto gear is flat out stupid.
I'm looking forward to reading your explanation of why gear is more likely to fail in an intentional fall than it is in an accidental one. Since you seem to be pretty good at tortured logic, I'm sure you can come up with something entertaining.

JL

No where did I say that, so following the logic you've asked for, I don't need to explain it.
Unimpressed


Partner cracklover


Aug 4, 2009, 4:06 PM
Post #73 of 116 (4495 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [moose_droppings] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
saxfiend wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
purposely taken falls onto gear is flat out stupid.
I'm looking forward to reading your explanation of why gear is more likely to fail in an intentional fall than it is in an accidental one. Since you seem to be pretty good at tortured logic, I'm sure you can come up with something entertaining.

JL

No where did I say that, so following the logic you've asked for, I don't need to explain it.
Unimpressed

I hate to speak for him, but I think perhaps the point Moose is trying to make is that there's a risk vs. reward calculation you have to make.

Think of it as if every trad fall, with the non-zero risk it entails, is like shelling out $$.

When you commit to a sequence you know you may not stick in the pursuit of a hard onsight or redpoint, you may end of paying $$ in the form of taking that fall, or you may send a route that's hard for you. This is a worthwhile benefit/risk endeavor for many people.

However, when you take the fall just for the sake of taking it, this is a risk with little or no reward IMO. Basically, the risk equivalent of flushing your $$ down the toilet.

GO


saxfiend


Aug 4, 2009, 6:19 PM
Post #74 of 116 (4476 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: [cracklover] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
I hate to speak for him, but I think perhaps the point Moose is trying to make is that there's a risk vs. reward calculation you have to make.
I don't think you're speaking for mooseturds at all; your analysis is right on, but it's not what he was saying. The only conclusions that can be drawn from his statements are a) an intentional fall is more likely to injure you than an unintentional one; or b) it's somehow more worthwhile to get injured in an unintentional fall than it is to get injured falling intentionally. The first is factually untrue, and the second is a matter of personal taste.

Mind you, I don't agree that intentional falls on gear, or a casual attitude toward falling in general, is a good thing. But having said that, I think you could make the case that an intentional fall on gear could actually be safer, when you consider it's more likely that the leader doing this will pay much closer attention to his gear placement and to backing up that placement in case it fails. Contrast that with an unintended fall on a single piece that's 10-20' above your last placement (not exactly an uncommon scenario); I think that's a situation with far more potential for disaster than the intentional fall.

JL


csproul


Aug 4, 2009, 8:28 PM
Post #75 of 116 (4450 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [saxfiend] First fall on gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I think what Moose is saying is that there is some finite probability that a fall will result in injury. And that there are uncontrollable factors that contribute to this probability. So if you intentionally fall, you are increasing the number of falls, and increasing the odds that you are injured. I don't think that this line of reasoning is completely stupid, and if that is how he/she feels, then by all means don't fall on purpose (especially if you see no benefit to doing so). What I object to is the lecturing of others who do not feel the same. Many people do see benefit in practice falls, or at the least climbing into high probability fall situations. Some of these people are even qualified to assess when this is appropriate.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Trad Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook