Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Sport Climbing:
Screening test for n00bs
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Sport Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 6:46 PM
Post #1 of 245 (40339 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Screening test for n00bs
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (25 ratings)  
Can't Post

You're at the sport crag waiting for your partner to arrive, an unkown climber walks up to you, and asks, "Hey, you want a belay?" You're on the spot. You'd like to get a warm-up burn in, but you don't want to end up on the wrong end of some hapless gymbie's rope. If you hesitate before answering, you risk offense. You must be definitive. It's either got to be, "Sure, that would be great," or "No thanks. I'm still a little hungover." You need a way to size up your potential partner that is systematic, fast, and accurate. In short, you need a

Screening Test for N00bs


Through years of keen observation, I have identified 10 key risk factors for n00bs. Give the climber the number of points indicated for each risk factor. Then sum the points to arrive at the climber's n00b risk score.

Risk factor 1: Helmet
Climber has a helmet at the crag: 2 points
Climber is wearing a helmet belaying: 10 points
Climber wore a helmet on the approach: 25 points
Climber got out of car wearing helmet: 100 points

Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
Climber's shoes, if not slippers, are made from natural leather: 10 points*
Climber's shoes are made by Mad Rock: 10 points
*Exception 1: Climber's shoes are Firés: -50 points
*Exception 2: Climber's shoes are EBs: -100 points

Risk factor 3: Harness
Any modern harness not made by Petzl: 5 points

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
Give the climber 10^n points, where n is the number of belay devices on the climber's harness in excess of one.
In addition:
Does not have a grigri: 10 points
Has a Cinch: 10 points
Has a device whose brand name is "ATC" followed by something: 10 points

Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points
Dogbones too skinny to grab: 10 points
Petzl logo on dogbones: -50 points

Risk factor 6: Rope bag
Non-Metolius: 5 points
None: 20 points

Risk factor 7: Stick clip
None: 10 points

Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
10^n points, where n is the number of items girth hitched to the climber's harness
10 points for each locking carabiner on the climber's harness not clipped to a belay device
50 points for each quick link on the climber's harness

Risk factor 9: REI
1 point for each appearance of the REI logo on the climber's gear
20 points for each appearance of an REI price tag on the climber's gear
100 points for an REI shopping bag containing the climber's gear

Risk factor 10: The color red
1 point for each red item among the climber's gear, unless the gear is unscratched; then, 10 points.
Red grigri: 15 points

Scoring:
100 or more: Run away.
50–99 points: High n00b probability. Climb with at your own risk.
25–49 points: Possibly a n00b or a visiting trad climber.
0–24 points: Probably an experienced sport climber.
Less than 0: The climber probably knows more about climbing than you do.


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 13, 2009, 1:23 AM)


bill413


Aug 11, 2009, 6:55 PM
Post #2 of 245 (40327 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Do I detect a certain Petzl bias?


curt


Aug 11, 2009, 6:58 PM
Post #3 of 245 (40320 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (12 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
You're at the sport crag waiting for your partner to arrive...

You're a n00b. The rest was superfluous. Cool

Curt


caughtinside


Aug 11, 2009, 7:16 PM
Post #4 of 245 (40300 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Damn. I checked in at 36. BD rope bag (red by gawd!), a mish mash of non petzl draws, arcteryx harness and no stick clip. I think my shoes are leather as well. Those evolvs are too hot and sweaty for my dogs.

n00b'd!Mad


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 11, 2009, 7:18 PM
Post #5 of 245 (40293 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
Climber's shoes are made from natural leather: 10 points*
Climber's shoes are made by Mad Rock: 10 points
*Exception 1: Climber's shoes are Firés: -50 points
*Exception 2: Climber's shoes are EBs: -100 points

Hmm, I would have made this one different:

A climber has the shoes clipped to his harness, 10 points
A climber is wearing Bufos, 20 points
A climber is wearing socks with his climbing shoes, 50 points (exceptions apply if the climber is above 50yo and the socks are tube-style, in that case subtract 50)
A climber is wearing his climbing shoes while walking around, 100 points


bandycoot


Aug 11, 2009, 7:19 PM
Post #6 of 245 (40291 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Awesome post Jay! 5 stars for sure! I'm in the "High n00b probability" category. Awesome. I could make a few simple changes (like actually bring my grigri) and that would solve the "problem", but the thing weighs so damn much!

No grigri +10
No stick clip +10
Natural Leather on my "warm up" shoes +10
(Cinch comes with me some days so optional +10)

30-40 for me!

Josh

PS. The 10^n ones are SO MONEY!


(This post was edited by bandycoot on Aug 11, 2009, 7:20 PM)


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 7:19 PM
Post #7 of 245 (40290 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [caughtinside] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

caughtinside wrote:
Damn. I checked in at 36. BD rope bag (red by gawd!), a mish mash of non petzl draws, arcteryx harness and no stick clip. I think my shoes are leather as well. Those evolvs are too hot and sweaty for my dogs.

n00b'd!Mad

If I were doing the screening, I wouldn't count the red rope bag against you. Ditto for red ropes or backpacks. Red carabiners, grigris, or dogbones, however, are definite risk factors.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 11, 2009, 7:30 PM)


boymeetsrock


Aug 11, 2009, 7:20 PM
Post #8 of 245 (40286 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I LOL'd


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 7:22 PM
Post #9 of 245 (40279 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [bandycoot] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

bandycoot wrote:
Awesome post Jay! 5 stars for sure! I'm in the "High n00b probability" category. Awesome. I could make a few simple changes (like actually bring my grigri) and that would solve the "problem", but the thing weighs so damn much!

No grigri +10
No stick clip +10
Natural Leather on my "warm up" shoes +10
(Cinch comes wtih me some days so optional +10)

30-40 for me!

Josh

OK. You and caughtinside were false positives, according to the current categories, but you both scored under 50. Looks like I need break the 25-99 category into two groups.


bandycoot


Aug 11, 2009, 7:23 PM
Post #10 of 245 (40275 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah, probably. 25-50 could be "Possibly competent but wanks around on cracks too often to know what to bring to a sport crag."

Josh


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 7:25 PM
Post #11 of 245 (40269 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [bandycoot] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

bandycoot wrote:
Yeah, probably. 25-50 could be "Possibly competent but wanks around on cracks too often to know what to bring to a sport crag."

Josh

That's basically what I did.

Jay


caughtinside


Aug 11, 2009, 7:26 PM
Post #12 of 245 (40268 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [bandycoot] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bandycoot wrote:
Yeah, probably. 25-50 could be "Possibly competent but wanks around on cracks too often to know what to bring to a sport crag."

Josh

Hah! busted.

I may slide in with the shoes though. My katanas and spectros are leather, but they have a small sheet of some synthetic stuff in the forefoot that doesn't stretch to keep the shape. So if I drop the 11 points I'm cusping at 25.


bandycoot


Aug 11, 2009, 7:32 PM
Post #13 of 245 (40254 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028

Re: [caughtinside] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You want busted? I bring MYTHOS to the crag! Ha! And, before I bought my first quick draws in 2007 (Petzl) I used to climb exclusively on 2' sling tripled into trad draws! I know, I'm an embarrasment, but wanking around on the cracks is just so damn fun!


caughtinside


Aug 11, 2009, 8:00 PM
Post #14 of 245 (40216 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [bandycoot] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

bandycoot wrote:
You want busted? I bring MYTHOS to the crag! Ha! And, before I bought my first quick draws in 2007 (Petzl) I used to climb exclusively on 2' sling tripled into trad draws! I know, I'm an embarrasment, but wanking around on the cracks is just so damn fun!

Mythos... the worst edging shoe of all time.

Might have to factor in a +10 for using the tripled up runners on bolts.


shoo


Aug 11, 2009, 8:07 PM
Post #15 of 245 (40206 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Harness not by Petzl: 5 points

Does not have a grigri: 10 points. I was actually intending to get a cinch, but I'm not sure I can go any higher on this without risking certain n00bhood.

Rope bag, not Metolius: 5 points. My 59 cent blue Ikea bag is the best rope bag/tarp I've ever owned. I'll take my points with pride for this one.

No stick clip: 10 points. Seriously? A stick clip is for experts? If Henry Barber were ever to be found with a stick clip, he'd probably be using it to thwack n00bs over the head.

Red items: 1 point, for my harness

Total: 31. I can live with that.


knieveltech


Aug 11, 2009, 8:07 PM
Post #16 of 245 (40203 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

120 points for two girth hitched slings and a couple of lockers? Harsh. Frown


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 8:09 PM
Post #17 of 245 (40196 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [knieveltech] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

knieveltech wrote:
120 points for two girth hitched slings and a couple of lockers? Harsh. Frown

Sorry, Dude. Bandycoot is correct. The 10^n items are indisputable.

Besides, haven't we told you to get rid of that second daisy chain elsewhere?

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 11, 2009, 8:12 PM)


dingus


Aug 11, 2009, 8:10 PM
Post #18 of 245 (40194 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [knieveltech] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

knieveltech wrote:
120 points for two girth hitched slings and a couple of lockers? Harsh. Frown

Harsh, yes. But indicative my man, indicative.

DMT


shoo


Aug 11, 2009, 8:11 PM
Post #19 of 245 (40192 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501

Re: [caughtinside] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

caughtinside wrote:
Might have to factor in a +10 for using the tripled up runners on bolts.

Screw that. Worn tripled runners as draws indicates trad experience, neutral points. Worn, knotted 1" mil-spec slings on Chouinard 'biners gets you -10. Brand new tripled runners and 'biners should net you +10.


caughtinside


Aug 11, 2009, 8:11 PM
Post #20 of 245 (40191 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [shoo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

shoo wrote:

No stick clip: 10 points. Seriously? A stick clip is for experts? If Henry Barber were ever to be found with a stick clip, he'd probably be using it to thwack n00bs over the head.

Yeah, most steep and worthy crags tend to be chossy and/or have hard moves right from the get go, so sticking the first bolt is a good idea. It's sport climbing, no one cares how boldly you climb to the first bolt.

I'm just going to not touch that Henry Barber comment...


gmggg


Aug 11, 2009, 8:13 PM
Post #21 of 245 (40189 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Shit! 36. Damn you red grigri!!!! Damn you to hell!!!!!

How much point break can I get if the red is ~60-70% scratched off?

How does it count if I wear my Misty Mountain Cadillac?? + or - it's hard to tell...


caughtinside


Aug 11, 2009, 8:13 PM
Post #22 of 245 (40189 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
knieveltech wrote:
120 points for two girth hitched slings and a couple of lockers? Harsh. Frown

Sorry, Dude. Bandycoot is correct. The 10^n items are indisputable.

Besides, haven't we told you to get rid of that second daisy chain elsewhere?

Jay

Dead giveaway.


caughtinside


Aug 11, 2009, 8:15 PM
Post #23 of 245 (40179 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [gmggg] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
Shit! 36. Damn you red grigri!!!! Damn you to hell!!!!!

How much point break can I get if the red is ~60-70% scratched off?

How does it count if I wear my Misty Mountain Cadillac?? + or - it's hard to tell...

wall harness to sport climb, +20.


caughtinside


Aug 11, 2009, 8:17 PM
Post #24 of 245 (40176 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [shoo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shoo wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
Might have to factor in a +10 for using the tripled up runners on bolts.

Screw that. Worn tripled runners as draws indicates trad experience, neutral points. Worn, knotted 1" mil-spec slings on Chouinard 'biners gets you -10. Brand new tripled runners and 'biners should net you +10.

Worn tripled runners does indicate trad experience, but at a sport crag that could either be a good thing or a bad thing. I'd tend to go bad, since 75% of trad climbers are in the 5.7 crowd.

I will admit to having used tripled runners at sport crags on road trips... and it sucks.


dingus


Aug 11, 2009, 8:18 PM
Post #25 of 245 (40172 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [caughtinside] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

caughtinside wrote:
gmggg wrote:
Shit! 36. Damn you red grigri!!!! Damn you to hell!!!!!

How much point break can I get if the red is ~60-70% scratched off?

How does it count if I wear my Misty Mountain Cadillac?? + or - it's hard to tell...

wall harness to sport climb, +20.

No. Wall Harness to trad = _+20 (either points or pounds, either will work)

Wall harness to sport climbing? That's gotta be +50, at least.

(yes I have done both, fairly recently haha - but I slimmed down again and the Misty Lard Bucket is no longer a necessity! Yay for me!)

DMT


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 8:20 PM
Post #26 of 245 (20991 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [gmggg] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
Shit! 36. Damn you red grigri!!!! Damn you to hell!!!!!

How much point break can I get if the red is ~60-70% scratched off?

I would be suspicious of a badly worn red grigri, since red grigris haven't been around for long. I would tend to suspect an intentional attempt to disguise one's true n00biescence.

Jay


tedman


Aug 11, 2009, 8:21 PM
Post #27 of 245 (20990 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 5, 2007
Posts: 237

Re: [knieveltech] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Dang 56...although up that to 67 if red gates on mammut classic draws count. So if you belay with a grigri/cinch and carry an ATC for rapping, you still get dinged for having 2 belay devices?


gmggg


Aug 11, 2009, 8:22 PM
Post #28 of 245 (20989 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [shoo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

shoo wrote:
Harness not by Petzl: 5 points

Does not have a grigri: 10 points. I was actually intending to get a cinch, but I'm not sure I can go any higher on this without risking certain n00bhood.

Rope bag, not Metolius: 5 points. My 59 cent blue Ikea bag is the best rope bag/tarp I've ever owned. I'll take my points with pride for this one.

No stick clip: 10 points. Seriously? A stick clip is for experts? If Henry Barber were ever to be found with a stick clip, he'd probably be using it to thwack n00bs over the head.

Red items: 1 point, for my harness

Total: 31. I can live with that.

I want a red harness to match my shoes and grigri.Wink

I think color matched climbing gear (of any color) should be counted as well.


knieveltech


Aug 11, 2009, 8:25 PM
Post #29 of 245 (20984 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431

Re: [dingus] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
knieveltech wrote:
120 points for two girth hitched slings and a couple of lockers? Harsh. Frown

Harsh, yes. But indicative my man, indicative.

DMT

*sigh* Guess I'll put my gym tags back on my harness now.


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 8:26 PM
Post #30 of 245 (20982 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [tedman] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

tedman wrote:
Dang 56...although up that to 67 if red gates on mammut classic draws count. So if you belay with a grigri/cinch and carry an ATC for rapping, you still get dinged for having 2 belay devices?

Plus another 10 for rapping.

Jay


gmggg


Aug 11, 2009, 8:27 PM
Post #31 of 245 (20977 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [dingus] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
gmggg wrote:
Shit! 36. Damn you red grigri!!!! Damn you to hell!!!!!

How much point break can I get if the red is ~60-70% scratched off?

How does it count if I wear my Misty Mountain Cadillac?? + or - it's hard to tell...

wall harness to sport climb, +20.

No. Wall Harness to trad = _+20 (either points or pounds, either will work)

Wall harness to sport climbing? That's gotta be +50, at least.

(yes I have done both, fairly recently haha - but I slimmed down again and the Misty Lard Bucket is no longer a necessity! Yay for me!)

DMT

+50 sounds right.

Next question... What if someone carries their draws on a shoulder sling, either gear sling, or just a doubled 60?


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 8:30 PM
Post #32 of 245 (20967 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [gmggg] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
dingus wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
gmggg wrote:
Shit! 36. Damn you red grigri!!!! Damn you to hell!!!!!

How much point break can I get if the red is ~60-70% scratched off?

How does it count if I wear my Misty Mountain Cadillac?? + or - it's hard to tell...

wall harness to sport climb, +20.

No. Wall Harness to trad = _+20 (either points or pounds, either will work)

Wall harness to sport climbing? That's gotta be +50, at least.

(yes I have done both, fairly recently haha - but I slimmed down again and the Misty Lard Bucket is no longer a necessity! Yay for me!)

DMT

+50 sounds right.

Next question... What if someone carries their draws on a shoulder sling, either gear sling, or just a doubled 60?

You mean on a sling over the shoulder—like, not in a backpack???!!!11

Jay


gmggg


Aug 11, 2009, 8:32 PM
Post #33 of 245 (20965 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
Shit! 36. Damn you red grigri!!!! Damn you to hell!!!!!

How much point break can I get if the red is ~60-70% scratched off?

I would be suspicious of a badly worn red grigri, since red grigris haven't been around for long. I would tend to suspect an intentional attempt to disguise one's true n00biescence.

Jay

2 years is enough for for me to ruin just about anything. Gear, daughters, my technique, etc...


bandycoot


Aug 11, 2009, 8:33 PM
Post #34 of 245 (20962 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028

Re: [shoo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shoo wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
Might have to factor in a +10 for using the tripled up runners on bolts.

Screw that. Worn tripled runners as draws indicates trad experience, neutral points. Worn, knotted 1" mil-spec slings on Chouinard 'biners gets you -10. Brand new tripled runners and 'biners should net you +10.

I totally disagree... Having made the painful conversion from pure trad climbing to having a clue at the sport crag (I used to onsight trad climb harder than I could sport climb) and realizing how little I knew in the realm of overhung sport climbing techniques, tripled trad draws should be a minus regardless.....

I'm proud to say that my hardest redpoint is still a pure gear climb as of last Saturday. I think it's probably good I'm in the questionable range...

Josh


gmggg


Aug 11, 2009, 8:35 PM
Post #35 of 245 (20956 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
You mean on a sling over the shoulder—like, not in a backpack???!!!11

Jay

Hell yeah!! You can see the world at the crags of the northeast.

Also, shirtless with a beanie while climbing, + or -?


squishy654


Aug 11, 2009, 8:47 PM
Post #36 of 245 (20939 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2008
Posts: 137

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Curry Village butter knife with keeper hole: -300

Any Fish products: -100

Mountaineers coil: +10

Army surplus anything: -10


shoo


Aug 11, 2009, 8:54 PM
Post #37 of 245 (20926 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

squishy654 wrote:
Army surplus anything: -10

Absolutely not. I have seen many former actual military climbers with army surplus gear. They are without question some of the most dangerously n00bulous climbers I have every experienced. Moreso, they tend to think they know what they are doing because they rappelled on a fig 8 once in basic training and don't take advice kindly.

If there just happens to be some former military peoples reading these forums, the location on my profile is a fake. I actually live in North Dakota.


gmggg


Aug 11, 2009, 8:57 PM
Post #38 of 245 (20915 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [shoo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shoo wrote:
squishy654 wrote:
Army surplus anything: -10

Absolutely not. I have seen many former actual military climbers with army surplus gear. They are without question some of the most dangerously n00bulous climbers I have every experienced. Moreso, they tend to think they know what they are doing because they rappelled on a fig 8 once in basic training and don't take advice kindly.

If there just happens to be some former military peoples reading these forums, the location on my profile is a fake. I actually live in North Dakota.

+1

Also, much army surplus lies in the hands of teenage gumbs who don't know better.


squishy654


Aug 11, 2009, 9:10 PM
Post #39 of 245 (20889 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2008
Posts: 137

Re: [gmggg] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

I am ex-Army and I rapped with a figure eight long before that in the Boy Scouts what does that make them?

I wear old Army T shirts while climbing because I don't want to pay over 20 bucks for something that isn't cotton. While I do agree that some ex military people act like noobs, I dare you to lump them all into "n00bulous". Basically you need to remember who your talking to, and in some regard you are the noob for making such gross assumptions...

Early Yosemite climbing was done on nothing but old army surplus biners and gear...go ahead and make sure you call them noobs too...

I was actually talking about surplus military gear, not veterans, if you want to drag them into it, you're asking for a hurting...


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 9:14 PM
Post #40 of 245 (20884 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (7 ratings)  
Can't Post

squishy654 wrote:
I am ex-Army...

+10

In reply to:
...and I rapped with a figure eight long before that in the Boy Scouts....

+20

In reply to:
I wear old Army T shirts while climbing....

+15

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 11, 2009, 9:15 PM)


shockabuku


Aug 11, 2009, 9:17 PM
Post #41 of 245 (20877 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

You know, I'm still in the Army, have been since 1985 in one form or another, and I've never rappelled with a figure of eight while in uniform.

But generally he's right, most soldiers don't know shit about climbing in it's modern form.


knieveltech


Aug 11, 2009, 9:17 PM
Post #42 of 245 (20875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

squishy654 wrote:
I am ex-Army and I rapped with a figure eight long before that in the Boy Scouts what does that make them?

I wear old Army T shirts while climbing because I don't want to pay over 20 bucks for something that isn't cotton. While I do agree that some ex military people act like noobs, I dare you to lump them all into "n00bulous". Basically you need to remember who your talking to, and in some regard you are the noob for making such gross assumptions...

Early Yosemite climbing was done on nothing but old army surplus biners and gear...go ahead and make sure you call them noobs too...

I was actually talking about surplus military gear, not veterans, if you want to drag them into it, you're asking for a hurting...

Butt-hurt threatening tones on the internet +20?


squishy654


Aug 11, 2009, 9:21 PM
Post #43 of 245 (20872 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2008
Posts: 137

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
squishy654 wrote:
I am ex-Army...

+10

In reply to:
...and I rapped with a figure eight long before that in the Boy Scouts....

+20

In reply to:
I wear old Army T shirts while climbing....

+15

Jay


Hell ya, now I'm noob...!!!

at least I don't clip bolts...


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 9:22 PM
Post #44 of 245 (20870 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

squishy654 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
squishy654 wrote:
I am ex-Army...

+10

In reply to:
...and I rapped with a figure eight long before that in the Boy Scouts....

+20

In reply to:
I wear old Army T shirts while climbing....

+15

Jay


Hell ya, now I'm noob...!!!

at least I don't clip bolts...

+100

Jay


shoo


Aug 11, 2009, 9:29 PM
Post #45 of 245 (20865 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

squishy654 wrote:
...in some regard you are the noob for making such gross assumptions...

I seem to have mistaken the purpose of this thread.


gmggg


Aug 11, 2009, 9:37 PM
Post #46 of 245 (20849 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
at least I don't clip bolts...

Damn boulderers.


squishy654


Aug 11, 2009, 9:38 PM
Post #47 of 245 (20846 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2008
Posts: 137

Re: [shoo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

The assumption was that if you carry surplus army gear you must be ex-military. When in fact surplus military gear was all they had in the beginning of Yosemite climbing, but I guess this post is only read by those who do not value such history or even know of it...my bad...I shouldn't be surprised when it turns into a vet bashing thread...it's understandable based on the population I am speaking too...


hansundfritz


Aug 11, 2009, 9:39 PM
Post #48 of 245 (20843 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2008
Posts: 139

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

squishy654 wrote:
Curry Village butter knife with keeper hole: -300

Any Fish products: -100

Mountaineers coil: +10

Army surplus anything: -10

So my 10 brand new FISH slings more than offset my mountaineers coil? Cool.

Note to self: order at least 3 different colors next time assist with gear sorting/untangling.


gmggg


Aug 11, 2009, 9:41 PM
Post #49 of 245 (20839 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

squishy654 wrote:
The assumption was that if you carry surplus army gear you must be ex-military. When in fact surplus military gear was all they had in the beginning of Yosemite climbing, but I guess this post is only read by those who do not value such history or even know of it...my bad...I shouldn't be surprised when it turns into a vet bashing thread...it's understandable based on the population I am speaking too...

Yeah damn Commies!!

Oh wait climbing history had a few of those...

Yeah damn pot smokers!!!

Oh wait...

Getting this back on track, how does some ganj factor into your rating of your prospective partner?


squishy654


Aug 11, 2009, 9:41 PM
Post #50 of 245 (20839 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2008
Posts: 137

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Using old submarine bunk as portaledge: -100

Bonus, if it was stolen from House keeping camp...


jmeizis


Aug 11, 2009, 9:43 PM
Post #51 of 245 (19093 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635

Re: [shoo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

What the hell, I got 0 thanks to all the brand bias. I didn't see anything about carrying trad gear at the sport area under "Unnecessary Gear". Did I miss it? I think you're giving the EB's and Fires too much weight. I could walk over to my bosses house and buy them and it'd put me in the more knowledgeable than you category. Definately some good indicators but could still use some revisement. I wish I had those indicators when I started climbing.


suprasoup


Aug 11, 2009, 9:45 PM
Post #52 of 245 (19091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 7, 2005
Posts: 309

Re: [gmggg] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Crap and I was hoping I'd never be a noob againFrown
2 belay devices and my Silent Partner, a Purcell Prussik, tripled trad draws, my bittersweet crash pad and a beanie. Let's not forget the set of tricams as wellUnsure




(This post was edited by suprasoup on Aug 11, 2009, 10:08 PM)


dingus


Aug 11, 2009, 9:46 PM
Post #53 of 245 (19089 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
squishy654 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
squishy654 wrote:
I am ex-Army...

+10

In reply to:
...and I rapped with a figure eight long before that in the Boy Scouts....

+20

In reply to:
I wear old Army T shirts while climbing....

+15

Jay


Hell ya, now I'm noob...!!!

at least I don't clip bolts...

+100

Jay

Lol!

DMT


jt512


Aug 11, 2009, 9:47 PM
Post #54 of 245 (19088 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

squishy654 wrote:
Using old submarine bunk as portaledge: -100

OK, let's review. The premise: You're at a sport crag...

Jay


Climbing_Pink


Aug 11, 2009, 9:54 PM
Post #55 of 245 (19077 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 10, 2008
Posts: 88

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (8 ratings)  
Can't Post

You forgot 6000 NOOb points for being a gear snob and giving a damn about what someone has with them beside you at the crag....


squishy654


Aug 11, 2009, 9:55 PM
Post #56 of 245 (19072 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2008
Posts: 137

Re: [gmggg] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
squishy654 wrote:
The assumption was that if you carry surplus army gear you must be ex-military. When in fact surplus military gear was all they had in the beginning of Yosemite climbing, but I guess this post is only read by those who do not value such history or even know of it...my bad...I shouldn't be surprised when it turns into a vet bashing thread...it's understandable based on the population I am speaking too...

Yeah damn Commies!!

Oh wait climbing history had a few of those...

Yeah damn pot smokers!!!

Oh wait...

Getting this back on track, how does some ganj factor into your rating of your prospective partner?

This is easy, if they show up and want a puff and say "I haven't done this since high school" +100

If they show up stoned, smoke some more and smoke the whole time, then there's no problem: +/- NA


code08


Aug 11, 2009, 10:42 PM
Post #57 of 245 (19031 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 2, 2009
Posts: 41

Re: Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Damnit I was doing so well till I got to the red equipment. I can't help that red is my favorite color.

+5 for non-petzl harness +1 for it being red
+10 for no gri-gri
+10 for not having a stick clip
+30ish for all my red carabiners ):


climbdork


Aug 11, 2009, 11:49 PM
Post #58 of 245 (19005 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 13, 2007
Posts: 38

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

All-Encompassing Risk Factor:
-Gets annoyed/offended when you say or do something that suggests s/he establish her/his belay skills to you before you put your life in her/his hands: +10,000 points


phillygoat


Aug 12, 2009, 12:10 AM
Post #59 of 245 (18997 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 22, 2004
Posts: 428

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You forgot chalkbag connection and a point system that denotes how loose their harness is - maybe +25 if it's hanging off their hips?


gmggg


Aug 12, 2009, 12:28 AM
Post #60 of 245 (18990 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [phillygoat] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

phillygoat wrote:
You forgot chalkbag connection and a point system that denotes how loose their harness is - maybe +25 if it's hanging off their hips?

I second chalk bad connection, that's a classic give away.


coolcat83


Aug 12, 2009, 2:36 AM
Post #61 of 245 (18963 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 1007

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

With the usual stuff I bring climbing, which is trad I score a 221, super noob. I don't fair too much better if retooled for spor cause I just don't have all that sporto gear.


Myxomatosis


Aug 12, 2009, 4:02 AM
Post #62 of 245 (18945 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 12, 2007
Posts: 1063

Re: [coolcat83] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I got quite low....

An 8 which I use to rappel (but guess you could say its a belay device) +10
Non Petzl draws +5
Rope Bag +5
Two Safety Slings +10
No Grigri +10
Red Rope Bag +1
Red 8 +1

42... 20 of which are debatable offenses (no lower off's in NZ so two slings and fragile volcanic rock) and my eight which I have never used to belay on.


desertdude420


Aug 12, 2009, 4:42 AM
Post #63 of 245 (18931 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 20, 2006
Posts: 294

Re: [dingus] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

You are supposed to actually take this quiz?! I had no idea that while I was out minding my own business climbing a rock... there was a group of fashionistas judging whether they thought that I was cool enough. Wow.


jt512


Aug 12, 2009, 5:00 AM
Post #64 of 245 (18928 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [desertdude420] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

desertdude420 wrote:
You are supposed to actually take this quiz?! I had no idea that while I was out minding my own business climbing a rock... there was a group of fashionistas judging whether they thought that I was cool enough. Wow.

Clueless, insecure respondent #2.

Jay


climbsomething


Aug 12, 2009, 8:43 AM
Post #65 of 245 (18906 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm surprised there aren't more hurt butts in this thread. But there's enough to keep me from thinking this site has gone into the Twilight Zone.

Souvenirs from HOUSEKEEPING! CURRY!! I'VE BEEN TO YOSEMITE!!!!11 I'd be genuinely impressed if you smoked some of the weed from the plane crash, though.

Thanks to Jay rehabbing me a few years ago (it started on our first crag trip when he called my Reverso a "Perverso"), I got a score of 15. That's owing to my leather shoes and Metolious "NoobTech" harness. 20 if you count my BD et. al. draws, but I haven't used them in years. Sometimes I carry a few in my pack for unforeseen A0 emergencies.

I am absolutely non-apologetic about the harness. It's cush. I'm skinny. I sit a lot.


bill413


Aug 12, 2009, 1:19 PM
Post #66 of 245 (18876 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [dingus] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Do I have to score the red points if I mark my gear with red? Frown


bill413


Aug 12, 2009, 1:58 PM
Post #67 of 245 (18850 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

squishy654 wrote:
Early Yosemite climbing was done on nothing but old army surplus biners and gear...go ahead and make sure you call them noobs too...

This thread is about SPORT climbing. Those hardmen were doing CLIMBING, not SPORT Climbing.


gmggg


Aug 12, 2009, 2:07 PM
Post #68 of 245 (18845 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [bill413] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bill413 wrote:
squishy654 wrote:
Early Yosemite climbing was done on nothing but old army surplus biners and gear...go ahead and make sure you call them noobs too...

This thread is about SPORT climbing. Those hardmen were doing CLIMBING, not SPORT Climbing.

Except when they were clipping bolts on the Bachar-Yerian. God those guys were such pussies.


dingus


Aug 12, 2009, 2:16 PM
Post #69 of 245 (18837 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh sweet Jesus its painful watching you all pretending you know from what...

DMT


gmggg


Aug 12, 2009, 2:42 PM
Post #70 of 245 (18824 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [dingus] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
Oh sweet Jesus its painful watching you all pretending you know from what...

DMT

Sorry, it had to be said with a statement like "At least I don't clip bolts" thrown out there as an ultimatum...


disturbingthepeace


Aug 12, 2009, 2:52 PM
Post #71 of 245 (18816 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2004
Posts: 57

Re: [suprasoup] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

suprasoup wrote:
Crap and I was hoping I'd never be a noob againFrown
2 belay devices and my Silent Partner, a Purcell Prussik, tripled trad draws, my bittersweet crash pad and a beanie. Let's not forget the set of tricams as wellUnsure

You're also the hardest climber I know that hates it when the draws are pre-hung, and belays with an ATC. Total sport noob land for you, even if you crush everyone's projects.


dan2see


Aug 12, 2009, 2:56 PM
Post #72 of 245 (18811 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2006
Posts: 1497

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yikes! 81 noob points.

But wait!
shoo's Chouinard biners: 6 of those
bandycoots' trad draws: 10 of those

Ha ha! now - 79 pro points!

Going to the crags this afternoon. If it rains while I'm climbing, I'm adding -50 more pro points, so watch out! I'll be so pro, I won't have to climb anymore -- I'll just sit on a rock and look cool.


olderic


Aug 12, 2009, 4:12 PM
Post #73 of 245 (18776 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 1539

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

The #1 show stopper should be having a climbing gym certification card dangling from their harness. When I see that I go boulder - and I do NOT ask them to spot.


fresh


Aug 12, 2009, 4:13 PM
Post #74 of 245 (18775 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

let's see!

helmet: yes, while belaying. (I know a girl who suffered brain damage from rockfall, a guy who got hit by a tree, and a girl recently got hit by a tree, all while belaying/chilling at rumney.) 10 points! and another 25, sometimes I wear it on the approach cuz I'm lazy. edit: oh SHIIII I forgot that sometimes I wear a helmet driving for chuckles. 100 points!

shoes: all leather, 10 points! (do we get extra points for extra leather shoes?)

metolius harness, 5 points!

belay device: I only use a gri-gri for bringing up a second on multi-pitch, 10 points!

quickdraws: unfortunately I use petzl draws, but I feel like putting BD/WC carabiners on them should count for something.

rope bag: damn, metolius.

no stick clip: 10 points!

unnecessary equipment: sling girth hitched, and another locker for clipping, and a locker with a prussik! woohoo 30 points! although in honestly, what else are people using besides a PAS to rap off of routes?

fuck, no rei.

red items: 10 heliums, 1 red sling, 2 dmm spectros, there's a little bit of red on my scarpa spectros I think, and sometimes I wear a red shirt. 15 points!

grand total: 215!

NEVER CLIMB WITH ME.


(This post was edited by fresh on Aug 12, 2009, 4:15 PM)


Partner cracklover


Aug 12, 2009, 5:15 PM
Post #75 of 245 (18748 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ooh, this is fun!

Let's see...

Risk factor 1: Helmet
+2 (Sport crags are chossy)

Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
+1 (Acopas)

Risk factor 3: Harness
0

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
0

Risk factor 5: Quick draws
+5 (for non-pretzl)

Risk factor 6: Rope bag
0

Risk factor 7: Stick clip
+10 (only bring a stick clip about 10% of the time)

Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
0

Risk factor 9: REI
0 (and funny!)

Risk factor 10: The color red
+10 (some of my biners are anodyzed. So what?)

Scoring:
25–49 points: Possibly a n00b or a visiting trad climber.

I plead guilty as charged, but would like to request a lenient sentence, as I think my heliums are kickass rope-end biners. Better than any pretzl crap.

Edited to add: my total score is 28.

GO


(This post was edited by cracklover on Aug 12, 2009, 5:17 PM)


Partner cracklover


Aug 12, 2009, 5:27 PM
Post #76 of 245 (17129 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh, and five stars.

GO


jt512


Aug 12, 2009, 5:43 PM
Post #77 of 245 (17120 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [cracklover] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
Ooh, this is fun!

Let's see...

Risk factor 1: Helmet
+2 (Sport crags are chossy)

Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
+1 (Acopas)

Risk factor 3: Harness
0

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
0

Risk factor 5: Quick draws
+5 (for non-pretzl)

Risk factor 6: Rope bag
0

Risk factor 7: Stick clip
+10 (only bring a stick clip about 10% of the time)

Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
0

Risk factor 9: REI
0 (and funny!)

Risk factor 10: The color red
+10 (some of my biners are anodyzed. So what?)

Scoring:
25–49 points: Possibly a n00b or a visiting trad climber.

I plead guilty as charged, but would like to request a lenient sentence, as I think my heliums are kickass rope-end biners. Better than any pretzl crap.

Heliums are light, which makes them good for trad, and bad for sport. Also, don't load 'em over an edge.

Jay


climbsomething


Aug 12, 2009, 6:14 PM
Post #78 of 245 (17106 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [gmggg] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
bill413 wrote:
squishy654 wrote:
Early Yosemite climbing was done on nothing but old army surplus biners and gear...go ahead and make sure you call them noobs too...

This thread is about SPORT climbing. Those hardmen were doing CLIMBING, not SPORT Climbing.

Except when they were clipping bolts on the Bachar-Yerian. God those guys were such pussies.
Bachar-Yerian- the ultimate sport climb!


shoo


Aug 12, 2009, 6:18 PM
Post #79 of 245 (17103 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501

Re: [fresh] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

fresh wrote:
let's see!

helmet: yes, while belaying. (I know a girl who suffered brain damage from rockfall, a guy who got hit by a tree, and a girl recently got hit by a tree, all while belaying/chilling at rumney.)

No you don't. She was at East Peak in CT, which is a trad area well known for being chosstacular.


fresh


Aug 12, 2009, 7:08 PM
Post #80 of 245 (17074 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199

Re: [shoo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shit, my mistake. I guess that means that all injuries at rumney have been caused by trees.


dingus


Aug 12, 2009, 7:09 PM
Post #81 of 245 (17072 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [climbsomething] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbsomething wrote:
gmggg wrote:
bill413 wrote:
squishy654 wrote:
Early Yosemite climbing was done on nothing but old army surplus biners and gear...go ahead and make sure you call them noobs too...

This thread is about SPORT climbing. Those hardmen were doing CLIMBING, not SPORT Climbing.

Except when they were clipping bolts on the Bachar-Yerian. God those guys were such pussies.
Bachar-Yerian- the ultimate sport climb!

But only if you're wearing army rejects!

(I can just IMAGINE the stonemasters wearing that military garbage bwaHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!)

DMT


cleethree


Aug 12, 2009, 7:18 PM
Post #82 of 245 (17068 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2009
Posts: 78

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I bring a helmet, wear La Sportiva Katanas and a BD harness. I don't use a grigri but an ATC guide. My draws are also BD, I use a bluewater rope bag and don't carry a stick clip.

67 Points! I dont feel like doing any extra belaying anyways. Frown


rockandlice


Aug 12, 2009, 8:11 PM
Post #83 of 245 (17037 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 622

Re: [cleethree] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

15 points.

BD harness and I carry an old tube and gri. Tube to rap. Tongue

Edit to ask: If I resoled any of my old Vectors or Lasers and wore them, could I get like a -1/2 point?


(This post was edited by rockandlice on Aug 12, 2009, 8:12 PM)


jeepnphreak


Aug 12, 2009, 8:55 PM
Post #84 of 245 (17005 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ths is an interesting test for n00bness. I did a quick add up of my gear list according to each factor.

My score was -25 (climbing for 12 years)way to go for the petzl gear.

my buddy that have been climbing for 6 months score of 55. Although is do trust him he still pulls a few bone head moves,


Oh and I think that 2 points for the helmet on while belaying is crap. I do ware a helmet while belaying because I hat getting hit my rocks while my bone head friend is above me. so mehhh!!!!


shimanilami


Aug 12, 2009, 9:09 PM
Post #85 of 245 (16992 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043

Re: [fresh] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

fresh wrote:
...belay device: I only use a gri-gri for bringing up a second on multi-pitch...

This goes beyond "simple noob" and into the realm of "jackass noob". You deserve extra points for that.

Even without, I think you've won.


Partner cracklover


Aug 12, 2009, 9:19 PM
Post #86 of 245 (16983 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Risk factor 10: The color red

Well, call me a n00b or a traddie, but I still don't get what this ^^^ is about.

GO


boymeetsrock


Aug 12, 2009, 9:20 PM
Post #87 of 245 (16981 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709

Re: [cracklover] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Risk factor 10: The color red

Well, call me a n00b or a traddie, but I still don't get what this ^^^ is about.

GO

+1


jt512


Aug 12, 2009, 9:31 PM
Post #88 of 245 (16974 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [cracklover] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Risk factor 10: The color red

Well, call me a n00b or a traddie, but I still don't get what this ^^^ is about.

GO

I don't think most of the people in thread get what any of it is about. I don't know why n00bs are more likely to have red gear than experienced climbers, but in my experience, they are. Next time you go to a sport crag, look around for the guy with the matching red quickdraws. Odds are, he's the n00b.

Jay


rockandlice


Aug 12, 2009, 9:44 PM
Post #89 of 245 (16968 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 622

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I read an article once that the color red in general attracts n00bs. I did see any sufficient evidence to back this up until I started being on the lookout at the crags.


gmggg


Aug 12, 2009, 9:53 PM
Post #90 of 245 (16960 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
cracklover wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Risk factor 10: The color red

Well, call me a n00b or a traddie, but I still don't get what this ^^^ is about.

GO

I don't think most of the people in thread get what any of it is about. I don't know why n00bs are more likely to have red gear than experienced climbers, but in my experience, they are. Next time you go to a sport crag, look around for the guy with the matching red quickdraws. Odds are, he's the n00b.

Jay

Ah, but that's the funniest part...


kriso9tails


Aug 12, 2009, 10:22 PM
Post #91 of 245 (16950 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points
Dogbones too skinny to grab: 10 points
Petzl logo on dogbones: -50 points


I'm all over the map on this one, but it's the only category where I'm registering any points (I meet all three parts). My draws are the way they are for a reason, and oddly enough I have been asked more than once about it, but my explanation has been reduced to, "Fuck you. That's why."


jt512


Aug 12, 2009, 10:33 PM
Post #92 of 245 (16945 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kriso9tails] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
In reply to:
Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points
Dogbones too skinny to grab: 10 points
Petzl logo on dogbones: -50 points


I'm all over the map on this one, but it's the only category where I'm registering any points (I meet all three parts). My draws are the way they are for a reason, and oddly enough I have been asked more than once about it, but my explanation has been reduced to, "Fuck you. That's why."

How'd you score the logo dogbones?

Jay


vincent


Aug 12, 2009, 11:08 PM
Post #93 of 245 (16930 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2003
Posts: 178

Post deleted by vincent [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (8 ratings)  

 


kriso9tails


Aug 12, 2009, 11:10 PM
Post #94 of 245 (16927 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Errr... no, I think I've mashed up a combination in my head of my old gear, current gear, samples and vendor images for Petzl that I've been looking through for work recently. Long day.

+50 n00b points to me for not remembering what my own damn gear looks like. (Jebus help me)

Well, at least none of my draws have any red in them for certain.


jt512


Aug 12, 2009, 11:10 PM
Post #95 of 245 (16927 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [vincent] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

vincent wrote:
+ 500 if the climber in question has over 16,000 posts on rockclimbing.com.

Ever notice that the only people who point out post counts are n00bs?

Jay


vincent


Aug 12, 2009, 11:13 PM
Post #96 of 245 (16923 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2003
Posts: 178

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (11 ratings)  
Can't Post

+ 200 if they jump on rockclimbing.com to defend themselves anytime someone hurts their feelings.


kriso9tails


Aug 12, 2009, 11:36 PM
Post #97 of 245 (16913 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [vincent] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

That's going be kind of hard to figure out at the crag.

You suffering from post envy or something?


jt512


Aug 12, 2009, 11:38 PM
Post #98 of 245 (16911 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [vincent] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

vincent wrote:
+ 200 if they jump on rockclimbing.com to defend themselves anytime someone hurts their feelings.

You think you hurt my feelings?

Jay


vincent


Aug 12, 2009, 11:40 PM
Post #99 of 245 (16907 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2003
Posts: 178

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (7 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's ok jt , you're still my internet climbing hero.


knieveltech


Aug 13, 2009, 12:18 AM
Post #100 of 245 (16891 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
vincent wrote:
+ 200 if they jump on rockclimbing.com to defend themselves anytime someone hurts their feelings.

You think you hurt my feelings?

Jay

Congratulations on your new groupie! Teach it how to troll, will you? This is embarrassing.


gmggg


Aug 13, 2009, 12:18 AM
Post #101 of 245 (17669 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [vincent] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

vincent wrote:
It's ok jt , you're still my internet climbing hero.

As silly and useless as your last couple posts were, this one was actually pretty funny. If you made it up then kudos to you.


jt512


Aug 13, 2009, 12:56 AM
Post #102 of 245 (17659 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [knieveltech] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

knieveltech wrote:
jt512 wrote:
vincent wrote:
+ 200 if they jump on rockclimbing.com to defend themselves anytime someone hurts their feelings.

You think you hurt my feelings?

Jay

Congratulations on your new groupie! Teach it how to troll, will you?

He doesn't strike me as being very bright. He accuses me of being a n00b (as if there's anything wrong with that, in the first place), even though my profile indicates that I've been climbing since he was in diapers. Moreover, he bases the accusation on my having a high post count—a post count that I have accumulated over nearly a decade of active participation on a rock climbing site. His profile says he's a teacher. I have to wonder what subject he teaches; hopefully, not mathematics or logic. He doesn't seem teachable, himself, to me.

Jay


billcoe_


Aug 13, 2009, 4:38 AM
Post #103 of 245 (17634 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
If I were doing the screening, I wouldn't count the red rope bag against you. Ditto for red ropes or backpacks. Red carabiners, grigris, or dogbones, however, are definite risk factors.

Jay

Good stuff on this thread Jay. I'd like to see it collated and organized a bit. I have the new red Wild Country Helium's...I see it as a second childhood thing though where I can go buy the shiny new gear like I had 37 years ago when I started out. Even if the old Eiger Ovals were not anodized...and only tested to 1800 lbs - gate closed! At least they were new and shiny.

Not much else though.


jt512


Aug 13, 2009, 4:55 AM
Post #104 of 245 (17627 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kriso9tails] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
How'd you score the [Petzl] logo dogbones?

kriso9tails wrote:
Errr... no, I think I've mashed up a combination in my head of my old gear, current gear, samples and vendor images for Petzl that I've been looking through for work recently. Long day.

+50 n00b points to me for not remembering what my own damn gear looks like. (Jebus help me)

I was going to say, I'm in a Petzl-sponsored DVD, and all I got was a T-shirt, and I had to give it back, come to think of it. The logo draws are a prize.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 13, 2009, 4:59 AM)


quiteatingmysteak


Aug 13, 2009, 5:38 AM
Post #105 of 245 (17617 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Hahahah, oh man, that was great.

It looks like I'm somewhere around 16 points, for having a non petzl harness, no stick clip and red Acopa's. Other than that, I've seen 150+'s out there.

This is SPORT cragging, right? The last place you'd expect to see aid climbing gear, like a daisy chain or helmet...

But seriously, arcteryx harnesses are great for when I flail on 10c's.


Guran


Aug 13, 2009, 8:59 AM
Post #106 of 245 (17598 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2008
Posts: 220

Re: [olderic] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

olderic wrote:
The #1 show stopper should be having a climbing gym certification card dangling from their harness. When I see that I go boulder - and I do NOT ask them to spot.

O dang, I'm actually guilty of this! The card is even red, actually.

(Since I suppose attached to my chalk bag is as bad as dangling from my harness.)
And I agree that's the noob sign above all noob signs. Note to self: Must separate gym kit from rock kit. Yes even chalk bag.

And btw my draws are BD. So is my harness. Which by the way has a maillon rapide on it. Have seen anchors with only hangers more than once.
Wear a helmet too. Even belaying. Used to skip it on sport climbs when I was a noob pretending I wasn't. Seen too much rockfall since then.

My n00b score is in the triple digits. Fine by me, since it means YOU'll belay, I'll climb, muahahah!


qwert


Aug 13, 2009, 12:15 PM
Post #107 of 245 (17587 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Well lets see:


Risk factor 1: Helmet
Climber is wearing a helmet belaying: 10 points

How many points do i get if i wear my helmet on the approach when done by bike?

But anyways: I have never met any rock that was so rock solid (har har) that i didnt want to wear a helmet. I know way to much about rocks to not wear one.
how about n00b points for NOT wearing a helmet? Or wearing a helmet that doesnt fit (you all know them: absolute n00bs, with their helmet sitting somewhere in their neck)

Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
Climber's shoes, if not slippers, are made from natural leather: 10 points*

Do i get extra points if i often wear them while belaying or walking to the next climb?
My toenails are way to fucked up for uncomfortable shoes.

Risk factor 3: Harness
Any modern harness not made by Petzl: 5 points

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
Give the climber 10^n points, where n is the number of belay devices on the climber's harness in excess of one.
Does a big locker that could get used as a munter in addition to my TRE count?
In addition:
Does not have a grigri: 10 points

Has a device whose brand name is "ATC" followed by something: 10 points
Sometimes i use my ATC-XP

Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points

Dogbones too skinny to grab: 10 points

About half of my quickdraws are the skinny ones, but i actually think they are quite good to grab. how about 5 points for that?

Risk factor 6: Rope bag
Non-Metolius: 5 points

Risk factor 7: Stick clip
None: 10 points

Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
10^n points, where n is the number of items girth hitched to the climber's harness

Do slings on the shoulder count?

10 points for each locking carabiner on the climber's harness not clipped to a belay device

10 to 40 points, depending on wehter i could be bothered to "clean" my harness
What do i get for prussik loops and a tibloc and some trad gear, for those climbs that are not bolt ladders?

Risk factor 10: The color red
1 point for each red item among the climber's gear
Red helmet, a couple of red slings, a few red biners, so about 8 points

Scoring:

So at minimum i got 88.
depending on what the unclear things are worth i could go as high as a few 1000s.
So its either
100 or more: Run away.
or
50–99 points: High n00b probability. Climb with at your own risk.

UnsureUnsure
I am such a sport n00b.
I guess all the years i am climbing i did it rong.

I heard ultimate fresbee is nice? anyone wants to buy my gear so that i can get my fresbees?

qwert


bill413


Aug 13, 2009, 1:01 PM
Post #108 of 245 (17577 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [qwert] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

qwert wrote:
So at minimum i got 88.
depending on what the unclear things are worth i could go as high as a few 1000s.
So its either
100 or more: Run away.
or
50–99 points: High n00b probability. Climb with at your own risk.

UnsureUnsure
I am such a sport n00b.
I guess all the years i am climbing i did it rong.

I heard ultimate fresbee is nice? anyone wants to buy my gear so that i can get my fresbees?

qwert

As long as you aren't planning on getting red ones.


king_rat


Aug 13, 2009, 2:22 PM
Post #109 of 245 (17557 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 365

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yikes, I’ve scored 66 I’m defiantly a Noob


dingus


Aug 13, 2009, 2:28 PM
Post #110 of 245 (17550 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
How'd you score the [Petzl] logo dogbones?

kriso9tails wrote:
Errr... no, I think I've mashed up a combination in my head of my old gear, current gear, samples and vendor images for Petzl that I've been looking through for work recently. Long day.

+50 n00b points to me for not remembering what my own damn gear looks like. (Jebus help me)

I was going to say, I'm in a Petzl-sponsored DVD, and all I got was a T-shirt, and I had to give it back, come to think of it. The logo draws are a prize.

Jay

The male American wearer of a Petzl harness has a 75% chance of being gay, according to a recent AMGU study. If that man also sport climbs it rises (hehe) to 85%.

Let your freak flag fly J!

DMT


jt512


Aug 13, 2009, 2:33 PM
Post #111 of 245 (17547 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [dingus] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
jt512 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
How'd you score the [Petzl] logo dogbones?

kriso9tails wrote:
Errr... no, I think I've mashed up a combination in my head of my old gear, current gear, samples and vendor images for Petzl that I've been looking through for work recently. Long day.

+50 n00b points to me for not remembering what my own damn gear looks like. (Jebus help me)

I was going to say, I'm in a Petzl-sponsored DVD, and all I got was a T-shirt, and I had to give it back, come to think of it. The logo draws are a prize.

Jay

The male American wearer of a Petzl harness has a 75% chance of being gay, according to a recent AMGU study. If that man also sport climbs it rises (hehe) to 85%.

I'd believe it.

Jay


gmggg


Aug 13, 2009, 2:41 PM
Post #112 of 245 (17541 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [dingus] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
jt512 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
How'd you score the [Petzl] logo dogbones?

kriso9tails wrote:
Errr... no, I think I've mashed up a combination in my head of my old gear, current gear, samples and vendor images for Petzl that I've been looking through for work recently. Long day.

+50 n00b points to me for not remembering what my own damn gear looks like. (Jebus help me)

I was going to say, I'm in a Petzl-sponsored DVD, and all I got was a T-shirt, and I had to give it back, come to think of it. The logo draws are a prize.

Jay

The male American wearer of a Petzl harness has a 75% chance of being gay, according to a recent AMGU study. If that man also sport climbs it rises (hehe) to 85%.

Let your freak flag fly J!

DMT

That also explains the aversion to certain colors. Brown is the new black!


billcoe_


Aug 13, 2009, 7:57 PM
Post #113 of 245 (17492 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Uses the word "Climbing" interchangeably for climbing anything be it sport, trad, buildings, stairs or alpine ....-20

Actually uses the words "Sport" and "Trad" + 20


Johnny_Fang


Aug 13, 2009, 8:55 PM
Post #114 of 245 (17472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2006
Posts: 289

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
How'd you score the [Petzl] logo dogbones?

kriso9tails wrote:
Errr... no, I think I've mashed up a combination in my head of my old gear, current gear, samples and vendor images for Petzl that I've been looking through for work recently. Long day.

+50 n00b points to me for not remembering what my own damn gear looks like. (Jebus help me)

I was going to say, I'm in a Petzl-sponsored DVD, and all I got was a T-shirt, and I had to give it back, come to think of it. The logo draws are a prize.

Jay

there's a bunch of 'em hanging off of dreamcatcher right now. come and get 'em.


suprasoup


Aug 13, 2009, 9:09 PM
Post #115 of 245 (17467 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 7, 2005
Posts: 309

Re: [disturbingthepeace] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

disturbingthepeace wrote:
suprasoup wrote:
Crap and I was hoping I'd never be a noob againFrown
2 belay devices and my Silent Partner, a Purcell Prussik, tripled trad draws, my bittersweet crash pad and a beanie. Let's not forget the set of tricams as wellUnsure

You're also the hardest climber I know that hates it when the draws are pre-hung, and belays with an ATC. Total sport noob land for you, even if you crush everyone's projects.

harsh man, harshFrown Guess that means I can't hang with the kewl kids anymore.


dingus


Aug 13, 2009, 10:09 PM
Post #116 of 245 (17449 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [billcoe_] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
Uses the word "Climbing" interchangeably for climbing anything be it sport, trad, buildings, stairs or alpine ....-20

Actually uses the words "Sport" and "Trad" + 20

Me too and I include skiing, hiking and peak bagging in that genre too and I don't give a fuck who likes it or not.

"I'm going climbing" can mean a lot of things to me and it only means one thing to Mrs Milktoast...

Mrs Milktoast wrote:
THANK GOD!

DMT


wanderlustmd


Aug 13, 2009, 10:36 PM
Post #117 of 245 (17440 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 8150

Re: [cracklover] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

What if you have some older BD draws but they were a gift?


wanderlustmd


Aug 13, 2009, 10:37 PM
Post #118 of 245 (17439 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 8150

Re: [wanderlustmd] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Good thread, btw.


iamthewallress


Aug 13, 2009, 10:46 PM
Post #119 of 245 (17433 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 2, 2003
Posts: 2463

Re: [wanderlustmd] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

48 for me. I just barely made the visiting trad climber cut. LOL.

I've told this story before, but it's a propos here.

When our house burned, we lost all of our climbing gear. Luckily, insurance paid for us to get shiney new gear. C4s had only been out for a couple of months, so in addition to the bold colors and sparkling, unscathed anodization, the item itself, when comprising 100% of the large cams on one's rack, was a serious n00b flag.

Anyhoo, there were only a few minutes left in the day, so we thought we'd try to cram a climb in at a roadside n00b-dominated (and guide-dominated) area where I had never actually climbed before.

The climb in question was 5.9 A0 or 5.11. My bf racked up as the duo that had just been on the route tried to disuade him. He danced 5.11 moves past the A0 and the slack jawed guy like it was nothing. Then the guy turned to me and said, "How hard does that guy climb in the gym?" LOL.

They were actually really sweet and confessed that they saw the gear and thought we were in for something ugly.

A bitchy girl at Indian Creek gave me grief about that rack too, but her assumption was that I must be the Paris Hilton of climbing gear and rerack whenever something new hits the stores.


(This post was edited by iamthewallress on Aug 14, 2009, 10:10 PM)


choplops


Aug 13, 2009, 11:33 PM
Post #120 of 245 (17406 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 1, 2006
Posts: 10

Re: [iamthewallress] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If you climb in Pennsylvania, you should be considered a newb (because PA crags are choss, everybody wears helmets who actually climbs at these "crags") (at least eastern PA crags) your newbishness can also be exposed if your first post is about asking for directions to a secret PA crag!Pirate Now I just sit back and wait for the hate from people committed to the "PA kicks ass" lie


(This post was edited by choplops on Aug 13, 2009, 11:36 PM)


jt512


Aug 13, 2009, 11:43 PM
Post #121 of 245 (17393 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [choplops] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

choplops wrote:
If you climb in Pennsylvania...

Risk factor 11: Location
Pennsylvania: 50 points

Jay


rockandlice


Aug 14, 2009, 12:01 AM
Post #122 of 245 (17380 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 622

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Oh, I've got a risk factor to add. I over heard this at the crag last month.

Dude 1: "Hey man, do you want to lead this one?"

Dude 2: "Nah man, I'm not yet certified to lead."


ShockedShockedLaughLaughLaugh


kriso9tails


Aug 14, 2009, 1:15 AM
Post #123 of 245 (17355 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [rockandlice] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockandlice wrote:
Oh, I've got a risk factor to add. I over heard this at the crag last month.

Dude 1: "Hey man, do you want to lead this one?"

Dude 2: "Nah man, I'm not yet certified to lead."


ShockedShockedLaughLaughLaugh

Conversely: refers to oneself as a 'guide' within the first five minutes of conversation when no one was asking.


rockandlice


Aug 14, 2009, 2:35 AM
Post #124 of 245 (17332 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 622

Re: [kriso9tails] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
rockandlice wrote:
Oh, I've got a risk factor to add. I over heard this at the crag last month.

Dude 1: "Hey man, do you want to lead this one?"

Dude 2: "Nah man, I'm not yet certified to lead."


ShockedShockedLaughLaughLaugh

Conversely: refers to oneself as a 'guide' within the first five minutes of conversation when no one was asking.


How can you tell if someone at a party or bar is a climbing guide?

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

They'll tell you.


sungam


Aug 16, 2009, 5:43 PM
Post #125 of 245 (17247 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [lena_chita] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
A climber is wearing socks with his climbing shoes, 50 points (exceptions apply if the climber is above 50yo and the socks are tube-style, in that case subtract 50)

That would be Dave MacLeod on Perfect Crime 8B.


bill413


Aug 17, 2009, 2:39 PM
Post #126 of 245 (16833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [sungam] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
A climber is wearing socks with his climbing shoes, 50 points (exceptions apply if the climber is above 50yo and the socks are tube-style, in that case subtract 50)
[image]http://www.hotaches.com/images/perfectcrime4_SM.jpg[/image]
That would be Dave MacLeod on Perfect Crime 8B.

Ah, but is that sport?


evanwish


Aug 18, 2009, 2:46 AM
Post #127 of 245 (16792 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

This one kinda sucks... The trad one was much better


jt512


Aug 18, 2009, 3:33 AM
Post #128 of 245 (16781 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [evanwish] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

evanwish wrote:
This one kinda sucks... The trad one was much better

n00b


evanwish


Aug 18, 2009, 4:29 AM
Post #129 of 245 (16774 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
evanwish wrote:
This one kinda sucks... The trad one was much better

n00b

explain


jt512


Aug 18, 2009, 4:37 AM
Post #130 of 245 (16772 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [evanwish] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

evanwish wrote:
jt512 wrote:
evanwish wrote:
This one kinda sucks... The trad one was much better

n00b

explain

Read the responses to this post and the trad version. This one has some validity. The other was devised by a n00b himself.


evanwish


Aug 18, 2009, 5:13 AM
Post #131 of 245 (16764 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
evanwish wrote:
jt512 wrote:
evanwish wrote:
This one kinda sucks... The trad one was much better

n00b

explain

Read the responses to this post and the trad version. This one has some validity. The other was devised by a n00b himself.

yeah thats true, but some things just seemed kinda contrived... like the red one. i have a #1 camalot, does that count??


bandycoot


Aug 18, 2009, 5:25 AM
Post #132 of 245 (16761 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028

Re: [evanwish] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

evanwish wrote:
jt512 wrote:
evanwish wrote:
jt512 wrote:
evanwish wrote:
This one kinda sucks... The trad one was much better

n00b

explain

Read the responses to this post and the trad version. This one has some validity. The other was devised by a n00b himself.

yeah thats true, but some things just seemed kinda contrived... like the red one. i have a #1 camalot, does that count??

Yes! Why are you climbing with a #1 camalot at a sport crag, n00b?


(This post was edited by bandycoot on Aug 18, 2009, 5:27 AM)


quiteatingmysteak


Aug 18, 2009, 5:30 AM
Post #133 of 245 (16753 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Have you heard about all those rad areas in the southeast?































Me either.


evanwish


Aug 18, 2009, 5:42 AM
Post #134 of 245 (16748 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040

Re: [bandycoot] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bandycoot wrote:
evanwish wrote:
jt512 wrote:
evanwish wrote:
jt512 wrote:
evanwish wrote:
This one kinda sucks... The trad one was much better

n00b

explain

Read the responses to this post and the trad version. This one has some validity. The other was devised by a n00b himself.

yeah thats true, but some things just seemed kinda contrived... like the red one. i have a #1 camalot, does that count??

Yes! Why are you climbing with a #1 camalot at a sport crag, n00b?

HOLY FUCK!!!!!! wow i'm an idiot.....


evanwish


Aug 18, 2009, 5:44 AM
Post #135 of 245 (16747 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040

Re: [evanwish] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

actually on second thought... i would be considered a sport noob... i've only done four sport routes, a 7R, 10b, 11a, and 12b...

i'm a trad nut...


scotchie


Aug 18, 2009, 6:25 AM
Post #136 of 245 (16739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 31, 2004
Posts: 261

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Somwhere out there is a noob who will score 0 based on reading this thread and acting accordingly.


kriso9tails


Aug 18, 2009, 6:57 AM
Post #137 of 245 (16736 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [scotchie] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

scotchie wrote:
Somwhere out there is a noob who will score 0 based on reading this thread and acting accordingly.

No, n00bs never really read anything properly nor do they do any proper research. That's a big part of what makes them n00bs.


fresh


Aug 18, 2009, 1:18 PM
Post #138 of 245 (16714 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199

Re: [kriso9tails] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
scotchie wrote:
Somwhere out there is a noob who will score 0 based on reading this thread and acting accordingly.

No, n00bs never really read anything properly nor do they do any proper research. That's a big part of what makes them n00bs.
BS, there are tons of n00bs who do research. it's part of making the step from n00b to novice. I think you're confusing n00b with gumby.


kriso9tails


Aug 18, 2009, 1:24 PM
Post #139 of 245 (16706 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [fresh] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

No.


fresh


Aug 18, 2009, 1:54 PM
Post #140 of 245 (16696 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199

Re: [kriso9tails] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I dunno. I think n00bs are new climbers who don't know shit but might be able to learn.


dingus


Aug 18, 2009, 2:08 PM
Post #141 of 245 (16688 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [fresh] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

There are all sorts of noobs, like unpolished turds every damn one of them.

DMT


bill413


Aug 18, 2009, 3:42 PM
Post #142 of 245 (16667 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [fresh] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

fresh wrote:
I dunno. I think n00bs are new climbers who don't know shit but might be able to learn.

That would seem to imply that old climbers (and / or longer term climbers) can't be n00bs.
Better recheck the definition.


fresh


Aug 18, 2009, 4:14 PM
Post #143 of 245 (16654 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199

Re: [bill413] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bill413 wrote:
fresh wrote:
I dunno. I think n00bs are new climbers who don't know shit but might be able to learn.

That would seem to imply that old climbers (and / or longer term climbers) can't be n00bs.
Better recheck the definition.
meh, I'll leave it to you guys.


Partner cracklover


Aug 18, 2009, 4:45 PM
Post #144 of 245 (16637 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [bill413] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

bill413 wrote:
fresh wrote:
I dunno. I think n00bs are new climbers who don't know shit but might be able to learn.

That would seem to imply that old climbers (and / or longer term climbers) can't be n00bs.
Better recheck the definition.

Uh, I think you're the one unclear on the definition. A n00b is someone who's new, at least to that arena. For example, I'm an aid n00b, having only done one small wall successfully, and having done less than 50 aid pitches. But I'm reasonably experienced in sport and trad.

What did you think it meant?

GO


scotchie


Aug 18, 2009, 5:26 PM
Post #145 of 245 (16617 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 31, 2004
Posts: 261

Re: [cracklover] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
bill413 wrote:
fresh wrote:
I dunno. I think n00bs are new climbers who don't know shit but might be able to learn.

That would seem to imply that old climbers (and / or longer term climbers) can't be n00bs.
Better recheck the definition.

Uh, I think you're the one unclear on the definition. A n00b is someone who's new, at least to that arena. For example, I'm an aid n00b, having only done one small wall successfully, and having done less than 50 aid pitches. But I'm reasonably experienced in sport and trad.

What did you think it meant?

GO

I think he was suggesting that there are some who have climbed for years but never learned anything from the experience, hence they are still n00bs.


kriso9tails


Aug 18, 2009, 5:33 PM
Post #146 of 245 (16612 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [cracklover] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's largely pejorative though, perhaps not in its origins, but in this usage. You call someone a n00b when they actually are new and are woefully naďve or when they've been around awhile and are completely ignorant (as in, "What are you, a fucking n00b?").


climbsomething


Aug 18, 2009, 7:16 PM
Post #147 of 245 (16578 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [evanwish] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

evanwish wrote:
jt512 wrote:
evanwish wrote:
This one kinda sucks... The trad one was much better

n00b

explain
Read the time stamps. Jay basically wrote the trad one, too.


jt512


Aug 18, 2009, 7:25 PM
Post #148 of 245 (16570 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [climbsomething] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbsomething wrote:
evanwish wrote:
jt512 wrote:
evanwish wrote:
This one kinda sucks... The trad one was much better

n00b

explain
Read the time stamps. Jay basically wrote the trad one, too.

I wouldn't say that I basically wrote the trad version. Rather, some n00b who didn't like his score on this test (not that this test was ever intended for self-scoring) went and developed a supposed trad version. But his version fails for two reasons: one, being a n00b himself, he gave completely wrong scores for many items; and, two, he based some items (like helmets) on value judgments, rather than observation.

Jay

P.S. I made a rare visit to Holcomb Valley Pinnacles this weekend, and believe me, this test is valid. I should have taken a few illustrative portraits.


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 18, 2009, 7:27 PM)


sungam


Aug 18, 2009, 8:15 PM
Post #149 of 245 (16550 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [bill413] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bill413 wrote:
sungam wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
A climber is wearing socks with his climbing shoes, 50 points (exceptions apply if the climber is above 50yo and the socks are tube-style, in that case subtract 50)
[image]http://www.hotaches.com/images/perfectcrime4_SM.jpg[/image]
That would be Dave MacLeod on Perfect Crime 8B.

Ah, but is that sport?
No, but I was actually looking for the one of him crushing an 8c spurt wearing socks. Couldn't find it though - I think it was happiness in slavery.


Partner cracklover


Aug 18, 2009, 8:50 PM
Post #150 of 245 (16538 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [scotchie] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

scotchie wrote:
cracklover wrote:
bill413 wrote:
fresh wrote:
I dunno. I think n00bs are new climbers who don't know shit but might be able to learn.

That would seem to imply that old climbers (and / or longer term climbers) can't be n00bs.
Better recheck the definition.

Uh, I think you're the one unclear on the definition. A n00b is someone who's new, at least to that arena. For example, I'm an aid n00b, having only done one small wall successfully, and having done less than 50 aid pitches. But I'm reasonably experienced in sport and trad.

What did you think it meant?

GO

I think he was suggesting that there are some who have climbed for years but never learned anything from the experience, hence they are still n00bs.

You're confused. When I call my friend who takes forever on descents because he steps so carefully - a "granny" - that does not mean that the definition of grandmother includes twenty-something year old men.

GO


cjon3s


Aug 19, 2009, 5:50 AM
Post #151 of 245 (16740 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 8, 2009
Posts: 150

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

I;d just like to know a few things.

What;s wrong with not having a petzl harness or draws? I have black diamond for both. No problems. And I have a cinch over a gri-gri. Seeing that it works better, your test is nonsense. Seeing that I have a rope bag but it;s not metolius I gained 5 points. Again, nonsense.

And what's so wrong with wearing a helmet?


kriso9tails


Aug 19, 2009, 7:03 AM
Post #152 of 245 (16729 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [cjon3s] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Are you being facetious, or do you really not understand?


gmggg


Aug 19, 2009, 11:57 AM
Post #153 of 245 (16716 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [cjon3s] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cjon3s wrote:
I;d just like to know a few things.

What;s wrong with not having a petzl harness or draws? I have black diamond for both. No problems. And I have a cinch over a gri-gri. Seeing that it works better, your test is nonsense. Seeing that I have a rope bag but it;s not metolius I gained 5 points. Again, nonsense.

And what's so wrong with wearing a helmet?

N00b!!!


LostinMaine


Aug 19, 2009, 1:14 PM
Post #154 of 245 (16706 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 8, 2007
Posts: 539

Re: [cjon3s] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cjon3s wrote:
I;d just like to know a few things.

What;s wrong with not having a petzl harness or draws? I have black diamond for both. No problems. And I have a cinch over a gri-gri. Seeing that it works better, your test is nonsense. Seeing that I have a rope bag but it;s not metolius I gained 5 points. Again, nonsense.

And what's so wrong with wearing a helmet?

Good luck in your climbing partner search. He'll be the one carrying the walkie-talkie to communicate with his partner more responsibly.


shockabuku


Aug 19, 2009, 1:54 PM
Post #155 of 245 (16693 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [cjon3s] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cjon3s wrote:
I;d just like to know a few things.

What;s wrong with not having a petzl harness or draws? I have black diamond for both. No problems. And I have a cinch over a gri-gri. Seeing that it works better, your test is nonsense. Seeing that I have a rope bag but it;s not metolius I gained 5 points. Again, nonsense.

And what's so wrong with wearing a helmet?

Same thing that's wrong with apostrophes.


kriso9tails


Aug 19, 2009, 2:19 PM
Post #156 of 245 (16689 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [shockabuku] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
cjon3s wrote:
I;d just like to know a few things.

What;s wrong with not having a petzl harness or draws? I have black diamond for both. No problems. And I have a cinch over a gri-gri. Seeing that it works better, your test is nonsense. Seeing that I have a rope bag but it;s not metolius I gained 5 points. Again, nonsense.

And what's so wrong with wearing a helmet?

Same thing that's wrong with apostrophes.

They make your ass look fat.


shockabuku


Aug 19, 2009, 2:26 PM
Post #157 of 245 (16686 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [kriso9tails] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
cjon3s wrote:
I;d just like to know a few things.

What;s wrong with not having a petzl harness or draws? I have black diamond for both. No problems. And I have a cinch over a gri-gri. Seeing that it works better, your test is nonsense. Seeing that I have a rope bag but it;s not metolius I gained 5 points. Again, nonsense.

And what's so wrong with wearing a helmet?

Same thing that's wrong with apostrophes.

They make your ass look fat.

Exactly.


jt512


Aug 19, 2009, 3:16 PM
Post #158 of 245 (16670 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [cjon3s] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cjon3s wrote:
I;d just like to know a few things.

What;s wrong with not having a petzl harness or draws?

Who said there's anything wrong with them?

In reply to:
I have black diamond for both. No problems. And I have a cinch over a gri-gri. Seeing that it works better, your test is nonsense. Seeing that I have a rope bag but it;s not metolius I gained 5 points. Again, nonsense.

And what's so wrong with wearing a helmet?

Is my test nonsense? Your profile is blank. How long have you been sport climbing, and at what level do you climb?

BTW, what's wrong with an apostrophe?

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 19, 2009, 3:17 PM)


cjon3s


Aug 19, 2009, 7:27 PM
Post #159 of 245 (16629 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 8, 2009
Posts: 150

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Seeing that I have been flamed, I am a n00b. Sorry about my misuse of the poor apostrophe.

I was not being facetious, I really did not understand.

Sorry jt.


TarHeelEMT


Sep 10, 2009, 4:56 PM
Post #160 of 245 (16531 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

50, which puts me just past the "visiting trad climber" category, which I am.

What's the deal with the color red?


kriso9tails


Sep 10, 2009, 9:18 PM
Post #161 of 245 (16495 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [TarHeelEMT] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

TarHeelEMT wrote:
What's the deal with the color red?

They wear red to hide the blood splatter on their clothes from the climbing partners they've dropped while giving shitty n00b-style belays.


TarHeelEMT


Sep 11, 2009, 11:53 PM
Post #162 of 245 (16466 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [kriso9tails] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I see.


rjtrials


Sep 12, 2009, 2:20 AM
Post #163 of 245 (16450 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 7, 2002
Posts: 342

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I got 22 but my 'leather' shoes are either Testarossa's or Scarpa Mago's. Although my harness is not a Petzl, i do climb in the new-ish Arc'Teryx harness, so i gave myself the 5 points begrudgingly. I also gained points on the quickdraws because about half my gear is either petzl dogbones or biners. all my shit is so old, beaten, tattered and worn, my draws aren't dividend by brand. Instead dogbone and biner are mated according to length and how much of a groove/notch the biner has or does not have.
I think i really only earned 2 points for my metolius dogbones that used to be red.

What is the official ruling JT??

RJ


jt512


Sep 14, 2009, 5:48 AM
Post #164 of 245 (16423 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [rjtrials] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rjtrials wrote:
I got 22 but my 'leather' shoes are either Testarossa's or Scarpa Mago's. Although my harness is not a Petzl, i do climb in the new-ish Arc'Teryx harness, so i gave myself the 5 points begrudgingly. I also gained points on the quickdraws because about half my gear is either petzl dogbones or biners. all my shit is so old, beaten, tattered and worn, my draws aren't dividend by brand. Instead dogbone and biner are mated according to length and how much of a groove/notch the biner has or does not have.
I think i really only earned 2 points for my metolius dogbones that used to be red.

What is the official ruling JT??

RJ

The test isn't designed for self-scoring. So, you have to ask yourself: how would an experienced sport climber score you. He'd probably notice the age of your draws and give you the benefit of the doubt on the mixed brands.

Jay


roughster


Sep 14, 2009, 6:17 AM
Post #165 of 245 (16420 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 3, 2002
Posts: 4003

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I scored a 10: Non-Petzl draws (though I have many Petzls) and a non-metolious rope bag (Fuck paying, I use a homemade synthetic table cloth with a elastic band to hold it together. Works like a charm.

Looks like a pretty good scale/indicator to me.


dingus


Sep 14, 2009, 12:36 PM
Post #166 of 245 (16394 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [roughster] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

roughster wrote:
with a elastic band to hold it together. Works like a charm.

That's hilarious roughster. My buddy Angus went deep into the BC with another partner of mine, it was their first (and only) back country adventure together solely in each other's company.

My other buddy was Mr High Tech, Goretex coated sleeping bag that compressed into the size of a walnut and cost a thousand bucks, etc.

They get to the bivi site and its drizzling.

Angus whips out his custom SHOWER CURTAIN BIVI TENT, layys it over his $50 polywhatever bag and is snoring before Mr Goretex can close his open mouth.

True.

And they never DID climb together again after that, but that's another story

DMT


billcoe_


Sep 15, 2009, 12:48 AM
Post #167 of 245 (16342 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [dingus] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
There are all sorts of noobs, like unpolished turds every damn one of them.DMT

I had to read this twice to catch the inference. LOL!

For myself, JT already called me out on it so sure I'll admit I'm a sport noob, but sometimes high end sport non-n00bs take pity on my sorry trad ass and drag my sorry butt out for some sport: but everytime I get home, I feel so dirty....and used. I just don't know how you all do it all the time.


bennydh


Sep 15, 2009, 1:01 AM
Post #168 of 245 (16340 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 2, 2005
Posts: 368

Re: [billcoe_] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I try to bitch and complain a lot whilst pointing out all the manufactured or glued holds when I sport climb. Somehow, I feel a little less dirty by doing this, and little less like a desperate climbing whore when I can't get on some nice trad line.

Blush


notapplicable


Sep 17, 2009, 7:38 PM
Post #169 of 245 (16262 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771

Re: [bennydh] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Not too bad. 40 points total and I agree with 30 of em. No GriGri, an ATC and no stick clip are definitely universal signes of the sport nOObage. If I actually cared I might would argue about the non-petzl harness and draws though.


jt512


Sep 17, 2009, 7:42 PM
Post #170 of 245 (16257 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [notapplicable] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

notapplicable wrote:
Not too bad. 40 points total and I agree with 30 of em. No GriGri, an ATC and no stick clip are definitely universal signes of the sport nOObage. If I actually cared I might would argue about the non-petzl harness and draws though.

It has to be an ATC-something, and it doesn't matter what something is, as long as it isn't blank. No points for a plain vanilla ATC.

Jay


notapplicable


Sep 17, 2009, 9:03 PM
Post #171 of 245 (16240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
notapplicable wrote:
Not too bad. 40 points total and I agree with 30 of em. No GriGri, an ATC and no stick clip are definitely universal signes of the sport nOObage. If I actually cared I might would argue about the non-petzl harness and draws though.

It has to be an ATC-something, and it doesn't matter what something is, as long as it isn't blank. No points for a plain vanilla ATC.

Jay


Woot!! 30 points for me.

I was given slight pause by the phrasing on that one but decided to err on the side of over scoring. Probably a subconscious thing; sport only makes up 17.9211% of my clilmbing so I was honestly expecting to score higher.


t_camuti


Oct 4, 2009, 1:44 PM
Post #172 of 245 (16154 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 9, 2009
Posts: 3

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

My regular partner is a 63 yr old climber who has been climbing longer than I have been alive (and I'm over 30). His scoring:

Risk factor 1: Helmet
Climber is wearing a helmet belaying: 10 points


Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
*Exception 2: Climber's shoes are EBs: -100 points
extra negative points for multiple home resoles with shoe goo that you can count like geologic layers of rock?

Risk factor 3: Harness
Any modern harness not made by Petzl: 5 points

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
Does not have a grigri: 10 points
how many points for using any excuse to use the Munther hitch? If he can't see his belay device, usually it is just on his rear gear loop, he just whips up a Munther and uses that for belay/ rappel.


Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points


Risk factor 6: Rope bag
None: 20 points

Risk factor 7: Stick clip
None: 10 points

Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
10 points for each locking carabiner on the climber's harness not clipped to a belay device
= 30 points

Risk factor 9: REI
0 points

Risk factor 10: The color red
0 points

Scoring:
-10 points

Less than 0: The climber probably knows more about climbing than you do.

Good test!


backclipped


Oct 22, 2009, 2:18 PM
Post #173 of 245 (16040 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2005
Posts: 137

Re: [t_camuti] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (8 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's been some time since I've visited this website. Some things have changed (like the face of the site) and some things haven't jt512 is still a jackass. Please place me in your "kill file", you f#$ing tool.
In reply to:


dolphja


Oct 22, 2009, 3:36 PM
Post #174 of 245 (16023 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2001
Posts: 298

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Risk factor 1: Helmet
Climber has a helmet at the crag: 2 points

Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
Climber's shoes, five tenif not slippers, are made from natural leather: 10 points*

Risk factor 3: Harness
Any modern harness not made by Petzl:BD!!! FK!! 5 points

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
Give the climber 10^n points, where n is the number of belay devices on the climber's harness in excess of one.
In addition:
Does not have a grigri: 10 points
Has a Cinch: 10 points

Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points x 10 =50
Petzl logo on dogbones: -50 points x 5 = 250
-200 what if it's a mix?

Risk factor 6: Rope bag
RED metolius- gonna have to add 1 point for that one

Risk factor 7: Stick clip
None: 10 points FK!

Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
10^n points, where n is the number of items girth hitched to the climber's harness
10 points for each locking carabiner on the climber's harness not clipped to a belay device x 2!!! AHHH 20 points Pirate FKING runners for anchors


Risk factor 9: REI

Risk factor 10: The color red
1 point for each red item among the climber's gear, unless the gear is unscratched; then, 10 points.
oh boy... need a calculator. FK = 11 more points


squishy654 wrote:I am ex-Army...

+10

army surplus (not really, just gear taken from in service) T-10C paracheute pack tray that i've been using as a crag bag for the past 15 years -10 points (bonus!)

desert camo patrol bag for trad gear -10 points

digital camo camelback for long wall routes -10 points

And the tally is...Unsure...Shocked... -141 (i'm thinkin' all those Petzl draws saved my life!)

i'm gonna have to add something to this.

Has not led 5.12 or higher in the past 5 yearsFrown "injury or not" +200 POINTS

Scoring:
100 or more: Run away.
50–99 points: High n00b probability. Climb with at your own risk.
25–49 points: Possibly a n00b or a visiting trad climber.
0–24 points: Probably an experienced sport climber.
Less than 0: The climber probably knows more about climbing than you do.


(This post was edited by dolphja on Oct 22, 2009, 3:40 PM)


dolphja


Oct 22, 2009, 3:37 PM
Post #175 of 245 (16022 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2001
Posts: 298

Re: [dolphja] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dolphja wrote:
Risk factor 1: Helmet
Climber has a helmet at the crag: 2 points

Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
Climber's shoes, five tenif not slippers, are made from natural leather: 10 points*

Risk factor 3: Harness
Any modern harness not made by Petzl:BD!!! FK!! 5 points

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
Give the climber 10^n points, where n is the number of belay devices on the climber's harness in excess of one.
In addition:
Does not have a grigri: 10 points
Has a Cinch: 10 points

Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points x 10 =50
Petzl logo on dogbones: -50 points x 5 = 250
-200 what if it's a mix?

Risk factor 6: Rope bag
RED metolius- gonna have to add 1 point for that one

Risk factor 7: Stick clip
None: 10 points FK!

Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
10^n points, where n is the number of items girth hitched to the climber's harness
10 points for each locking carabiner on the climber's harness not clipped to a belay device x 2!!! AHHH 20 points Pirate FKING runners for anchors


Risk factor 9: REI

Risk factor 10: The color red
1 point for each red item among the climber's gear, unless the gear is unscratched; then, 10 points.
oh boy... need a calculator. FK = 11 more points


squishy654 wrote:I am ex-Army...

+10

army surplus (not really, just gear taken from in service) T-10C paracheute pack tray that i've been using as a crag bag for the past 15 years -10 points (bonus!)

desert camo patrol bag for trad gear -10 points

digital camo camelback for long wall routes -10 points

And the tally is...Unsure...Shocked... -141 (i'm thinkin' all those Petzl draws saved my life!)

i'm gonna have to add something to this.

Has not led 5.12 or higher in the past 5 yearsFrown "injury or not"

Scoring:
100 or more: Run away.
50–99 points: High n00b probability. Climb with at your own risk.
25–49 points: Possibly a n00b or a visiting trad climber.
0–24 points: Probably an experienced sport climber.
Less than 0: The climber probably knows more about climbing than you do.

that would put me in the Possibly a n00b or a visiting trad climber category Mad


granite_grrl


Oct 22, 2009, 4:43 PM
Post #176 of 245 (18019 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084

Re: [qwert] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

qwert wrote:
Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points

Dogbones too skinny to grab: 10 points

About half of my quickdraws are the skinny ones, but i actually think they are quite good to grab. how about 5 points for that?
The only thing worse than carrying skinny draws that suck to grab is going around telling people that you actually think they are quite good to grab.

Are you climbing slab or something?


qwert


Oct 22, 2009, 7:07 PM
Post #177 of 245 (17981 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394

Re: [granite_grrl] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

granite_grrl wrote:
qwert wrote:
Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points

Dogbones too skinny to grab: 10 points

About half of my quickdraws are the skinny ones, but i actually think they are quite good to grab. how about 5 points for that?
The only thing worse than carrying skinny draws that suck to grab is going around telling people that you actually think they are quite good to grab.

Are you climbing slab or something?
Actually i do enjoy slab climbing the most, but im not grabbing draws on slabs. Unlike ooverhanging crap, slabs can be done with technique and not just stupid power.

qwert


(This post was edited by qwert on Oct 23, 2009, 1:12 PM)


kriso9tails


Oct 22, 2009, 11:54 PM
Post #178 of 245 (17946 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [qwert] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

qwert wrote:
Actually i do enjoy slab climbing the most, but im not grabbing draws on slabs. Unlike ooverhanging crap slabs can be done with technique and not just stupid power.

qwert

Overhanging crap slabs? Sounds kind of gross.


jt512


Oct 23, 2009, 5:11 AM
Post #179 of 245 (17917 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [dolphja] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I tried this test out on myself: 10 points

And afterward, for some reason, my butt really hurt: 100 points.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Oct 23, 2009, 5:11 AM)


billcoe_


Oct 23, 2009, 5:23 AM
Post #180 of 245 (17909 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
I tried this test out on myself: 10 points And afterward, for some reason, my butt really hurt: 100 points. Jay

Was Angry giving you the test?


qwert


Oct 23, 2009, 1:16 PM
Post #181 of 245 (17876 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394

Re: [kriso9tails] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
qwert wrote:
Actually i do enjoy slab climbing the most, but im not grabbing draws on slabs. Unlike ooverhanging crap slabs can be done with technique and not just stupid power.

qwert

Overhanging crap slabs? Sounds kind of gross.
Oh yes it is!
does a , make it better?

qwert


granite_grrl


Oct 23, 2009, 1:41 PM
Post #182 of 245 (17871 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084

Re: [qwert] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

qwert wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
qwert wrote:
Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points

Dogbones too skinny to grab: 10 points

About half of my quickdraws are the skinny ones, but i actually think they are quite good to grab. how about 5 points for that?
The only thing worse than carrying skinny draws that suck to grab is going around telling people that you actually think they are quite good to grab.

Are you climbing slab or something?
Actually i do enjoy slab climbing the most, but im not grabbing draws on slabs. Unlike ooverhanging crap, slabs can be done with technique and not just stupid power.

qwert
Now you're just making excuses for yourself.


swoopee


Oct 24, 2009, 4:57 PM
Post #183 of 245 (17823 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 560

Re: [dolphja] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Apparently I am in the run away category. Unsure


hafilax


Oct 26, 2009, 8:51 PM
Post #184 of 245 (17766 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [swoopee] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

swoopee wrote:
Apparently I am in the run away category. Unsure
In that case could you put up a clearer profile picture.


swoopee


Oct 26, 2009, 11:09 PM
Post #185 of 245 (17748 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 560

Re: [hafilax] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I am sure you'll recognize me when I step out of the car and put my helmet on. Wink


tradmanclimbs


Oct 31, 2009, 3:01 AM
Post #186 of 245 (17703 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 2599

Re: [swoopee] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Damn. Jay that is an awsome test. I scored 80 but that was only after I ditched the wire brush, pry bar, hand saw, etriers, jumar, bolt kit, hammer,pitons, hooks and drillCool


Seroiusly, with my normal rig I still got an 80Tongue Wondering if I really have to give myself 10 points for Mad Rock Flash... I mean they are slippers fer christ sake.. just because they are the wrong brand...


tradmanclimbs


Oct 31, 2009, 3:12 AM
Post #187 of 245 (17701 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 2599

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

A few years ago I soloed RBF on a super nasty cold windy bulletproof day. I got in my VW buss with helmet and Crampons on and drove to chapple pond working that clutch, gas and mushy brakes with rambocomps while stareing through the one tiny clear spot on my frozen windshield. Pulled into the Chaple pond parking and step out with helmet, crampons and tools ready to go. Fight the wind accross the frozen pond and solo Chiounards.. Must have racked up some noob points with that stuntCool

Drank about 10 Adirondak pale ales on the way back to VT on that trip....


scm007


Nov 17, 2009, 1:43 AM
Post #188 of 245 (17608 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2007
Posts: 44

Re: [tradmanclimbs] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

22.

Why the bias against the Cinch?


jt512


Nov 17, 2009, 2:28 AM
Post #189 of 245 (17595 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [scm007] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

scm007 wrote:
22.

Why the bias against the Cinch?

I have no bias against the Cinch. Why the bias toward interpreting empirical observations as value judgments.

Jay


scm007


Nov 17, 2009, 2:54 AM
Post #190 of 245 (17589 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2007
Posts: 44

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
scm007 wrote:
22.

Why the bias against the Cinch?

I have no bias against the Cinch. Why the bias toward interpreting empirical observations as value judgments.

Jay

Ahh ok if the evidence points that way! I thought somehow you were just ranting against shit you didn't like. I use a cinch and I struggle on .11s, so your evidence is sound... so far :) .

Also, helmets with your name on the front +50,000


(This post was edited by scm007 on Nov 17, 2009, 2:56 AM)


ClimbTheCrag


Dec 25, 2009, 5:39 AM
Post #191 of 245 (17455 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 25, 2009
Posts: 16

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

haha, I must have read the begining backwards cause i though you were saying petzl was bad and REI was good so I was like "what the heck?"
In reply to:


ClimbTheCrag


Dec 25, 2009, 5:46 AM
Post #192 of 245 (17455 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 25, 2009
Posts: 16

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sweet -3 :D


rossross


Nov 23, 2011, 8:57 PM
Post #193 of 245 (17044 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 29, 2007
Posts: 40

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

10 points

Arcteryx harness, old school vapor, getting a little fuzzy. I think a fuzzy "skinner" harness should be worth +100 points personally lol.

Non Petzl draws. Also I think old beat up draws (still solid) should be 0 points. New spirits with minimal scratches should be +20.


tH1e-swiN1e


Nov 25, 2011, 5:05 PM
Post #194 of 245 (16943 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 28, 2011
Posts: 192

Re: [rossross] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

2 year revive..........WOW


tscampbell


Nov 26, 2011, 12:02 AM
Post #195 of 245 (16916 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 30, 2009
Posts: 38

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gonna have to say my 20 yr old gypsy rope bag (bomb proof) doesn't add any points....


jt512


Nov 26, 2011, 2:19 AM
Post #196 of 245 (16906 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [tH1e-swiN1e] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

tH1e-swiN1e wrote:
2 year revive..........WOW

Yeah, who would have thought it would have taken this long?

Jay


JimTitt


Nov 26, 2011, 12:07 PM
Post #197 of 245 (16874 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2008
Posts: 1002

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Took a while for the paint to dry on my Grigri.


Partner rgold


Nov 28, 2011, 5:38 AM
Post #198 of 245 (16768 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804

Re: [JimTitt] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well, I don't really sport climb much and don't have any dedicated sport climbing gear. So, my Noob index is 132 (*), making me one of the last people you should accept a belay from. At 132 sprinting may not be required, but a purposeful jog in the opposite direction is surely called for. However, see note below.

(*) Most of my gear is marked with red tape. If I had counted that in the scoring, my index would have been astronomical, and mere running away would probably not save you from the billowing cloud of noobish contamination surrounding me.


JimTitt


Nov 28, 2011, 7:10 AM
Post #199 of 245 (16755 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2008
Posts: 1002

Re: [rgold] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I got 20 but I climb like a beginner!

Though there must be bonus points for the rain of bolts, drill bits, spare batteries and stuff that always appears I tip my sack out.


guangzhou


Nov 29, 2011, 10:59 AM
Post #200 of 245 (16664 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You're at the sport crag waiting for your partner to arrive, an unkown climber walks up to you, and asks, "Hey, you want a belay?" You're on the spot. You'd like to get a warm-up burn in, but you don't want to end up on the wrong end of some hapless gymbie's rope. If you hesitate before answering, you risk offense. You must be definitive. It's either got to be, "Sure, that would be great," or "No thanks. I'm still a little hungover." You need a way to size up your potential partner that is systematic, fast, and accurate. In short, you need a

Screening Test for N00bs

Through years of keen observation, I have identified 10 key risk factors for n00bs. Give the climber the number of points indicated for each risk factor. Then sum the points to arrive at the climber's n00b risk score.

Risk factor 1: Helmet
Climber has a helmet at the crag: 2 points
Climber is wearing a helmet belaying: 10 points
Climber wore a helmet on the approach: 25 points
Climber got out of car wearing helmet: 100 points
Every-time or just from time to time?

In reply to:
Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
Climber's shoes, if not slippers, are made from natural leather: 10 points*
Climber's shoes are made by Mad Rock: 10 points
*Exception 1: Climber's shoes are Firés: -50 points
*Exception 2: Climber's shoes are EBs: -100 points

Love my fire, but also love my 5.10 red slippers. Rad Mock by Climb X is great too.

In reply to:
Risk factor 3: Harness
Any modern harness not made by Petzl: 5 points

Ouch, I have never liked a single Petzl Harness. Especially the gear loop layout.

In reply to:
Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
Give the climber 10^n points, where n is the number of belay devices on the climber's harness in excess of one.
In addition:
Does not have a grigri: 10 points
Has a Cinch: 10 points
Has a device whose brand name is "ATC" followed by something: 10 points

Always two devices, oh well. (Often one of them is a gri-gri)

In reply to:
Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points
Dogbones too skinny to grab: 10 points
Petzl logo on dogbones: -50 points

Skinny draws with wire-gates here. Even my runners are skinny with wire-gates.

In reply to:
Risk factor 6: Rope bag
Non-Metolius: 5 points
None: 20 points

In reply to:
Risk factor 7: Stick clip
None: 10 points
Rarely use it

In reply to:
Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
10^n points, where n is the number of items girth hitched to the climber's harness
10 points for each locking carabiner on the climber's harness not clipped to a belay device
50 points for each quick link on the climber's harness

Can you define unnecessary?

In reply to:
Risk factor 9: REI
1 point for each appearance of the REI logo on the climber's gear
20 points for each appearance of an REI price tag on the climber's gear
100 points for an REI shopping bag containing the climber's gear
Tongue

In reply to:
Risk factor 10: The color red
1 point for each red item among the climber's gear, unless the gear is unscratched; then, 10 points.
Red grigri: 15 points

I think all my gear is currently marked with red nail-polish.

In reply to:
Scoring:
100 or more: Run away.
50–99 points: High n00b probability. Climb with at your own risk.
25–49 points: Possibly a n00b or a visiting trad climber.
0–24 points: Probably an experienced sport climber.
Less than 0: The climber probably knows more about climbing than you do.

Pirate


ChalkIsCheap


Nov 29, 2011, 5:33 PM
Post #201 of 245 (14225 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 27, 2010
Posts: 93

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
tH1e-swiN1e wrote:
2 year revive..........WOW

Yeah, who would have thought it would have taken this long?

Jay
2 year revive... How many points is that worth?


donald949


Dec 2, 2011, 11:49 PM
Post #202 of 245 (14128 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455

Re: [ChalkIsCheap] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

REI Red Crag bag 1+1
Red Helmet 2+1
ATC XP 10
Leather shoes 10
Met Safe harness 5
Met skinny bones 10
homemade canvas rope sack 5
No stick 10
PAS on Harness 10
4 lockers on long bones or cord for anchor 40 points

105 run away.

Now I wanting to break out my old REI pear lockers and D's for some real bonus points.


donald949


Dec 3, 2011, 12:04 AM
Post #203 of 245 (14121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455

Re: [dan2see] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dan2see wrote:
Yikes! 81 noob points.

But wait!
shoo's Chouinard biners: 6 of those
bandycoots' trad draws: 10 of those

Ha ha! now - 79 pro points!

Going to the crags this afternoon. If it rains while I'm climbing, I'm adding -50 more pro points, so watch out! I'll be so pro, I won't have to climb anymore -- I'll just sit on a rock and look cool.
Wait, I get pro points for my Chouinard biners?
*digs through buckert of old crap*
Here it is:

Check out the scary backward locking biner.


dan2see


Dec 3, 2011, 4:54 AM
Post #204 of 245 (14093 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2006
Posts: 1497

Re: [donald949] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

That post you quoted was from August 2009. A lot has happened since then.

For one thing, that winter I went ice-climbing a few times. Always multi-pitch waterfalls. I bought some second-hand ice screws and I filed the points myself

But I scramble a lot. Mostly easy, rarely alpine, but it's real scrambles, on real rock with plenty of exposure. That means, I often rock-climb, on remote ridges, with backpack, boots, and mitts, and I climb with no pro at all!

Hey! that's gotta be worth more cool anti-noob points for me!


jae8908


Dec 4, 2011, 5:28 AM
Post #205 of 245 (14062 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 15, 2011
Posts: 270

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

petzl helmet: 2
edelrid harness: 5
mixed quickdraws: 5
mammut bag: 5
stick clip: 10
red accessory cord: 1
total: 28
luckily I carry 2 of my belay devices in my rope/gear bag all of the time along with all of my locking biners.
guess I'm a n00b


Marylandclimber


Dec 4, 2011, 8:13 PM
Post #206 of 245 (14028 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 3, 2011
Posts: 224

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I scored 50. :( whats so bad about not having a GriGri?


climbingtrash


Dec 4, 2011, 9:07 PM
Post #207 of 245 (14017 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [Marylandclimber] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Marylandclimber wrote:
I scored 50. :( whats so bad about not having a GriGri?

Add another 50 to yore score for such a question.


Marylandclimber


Dec 5, 2011, 1:31 AM
Post #208 of 245 (13993 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 3, 2011
Posts: 224

Re: [climbingtrash] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

But why? Whats wrong with ATC? Or ATC-XP?


climbingtrash


Dec 5, 2011, 2:17 AM
Post #209 of 245 (13982 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [Marylandclimber] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Marylandclimber wrote:
But why? Whats wrong with ATC? Or ATC-XP?

Nothing.


Marylandclimber


Dec 5, 2011, 12:13 PM
Post #210 of 245 (13956 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 3, 2011
Posts: 224

Re: [climbingtrash] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

So then I get 50points D: extra


rtwilli4


Dec 5, 2011, 1:55 PM
Post #211 of 245 (13946 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I got points for having a Misty Mountain Harness, DMM biners, and an IKEA bag for my rope.

Somehow that doesn't seem right to me.


chadnsc


Dec 5, 2011, 4:27 PM
Post #212 of 245 (13917 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 (35 points) I've a visiting trad climber! Now why would I be visiting a sport crag again? Tongue


jt512


Dec 5, 2011, 7:52 PM
Post #213 of 245 (13881 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [rtwilli4] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rtwilli4 wrote:
I got points for having a Misty Mountain Harness, DMM biners, and an IKEA bag for my rope.

Somehow that doesn't seem right to me.

I agree. You should have gotten more points for the Ikea bag.

Jay


rtwilli4


Dec 5, 2011, 7:55 PM
Post #214 of 245 (13877 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
I got points for having a Misty Mountain Harness, DMM biners, and an IKEA bag for my rope.

Somehow that doesn't seem right to me.

I agree. You should have gotten more points for the Ikea bag.

Jay

Why? If the rope and bag are going in a pack anyway then what is the point of spending any money on something that you are just going to toss in the dirt?

My IKEA bag cost 35 cents, keeps my rope clean and has handles that make it easy to carry from route to route. What else could you ask for in a rope bag?


jt512


Dec 5, 2011, 8:44 PM
Post #215 of 245 (13863 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [rtwilli4] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

rtwilli4 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
I got points for having a Misty Mountain Harness, DMM biners, and an IKEA bag for my rope.

Somehow that doesn't seem right to me.

I agree. You should have gotten more points for the Ikea bag.

Jay

Why? If the rope and bag are going in a pack anyway then what is the point of spending any money on something that you are just going to toss in the dirt?

My IKEA bag cost 35 cents, keeps my rope clean and has handles that make it easy to carry from route to route. What else could you ask for in a rope bag?

Since you have no sense of humor, the serious answer is, in part, that a good rope bag packs up smaller.

Now go give yourself 50 more points for being offended by your score.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Dec 5, 2011, 8:45 PM)


GabeWalker


Dec 5, 2011, 9:02 PM
Post #216 of 245 (13857 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 9, 2006
Posts: 70

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

When I show up anywhere, everyone else is a n00b


sungam


Dec 5, 2011, 9:11 PM
Post #217 of 245 (13852 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [GabeWalker] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

GabeWalker wrote:
When I show up anywhere, everyone else is a n00b
I don't know if everyone else does, but when Gabe Walker speaks, I listen.


ENARE


Dec 6, 2011, 4:35 PM
Post #218 of 245 (13762 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2011
Posts: 275

Re: [GabeWalker] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

27 - But I am still a noob - You should see the racing stripes I put on my helmet (not red - but orange duct tape).


andrewluke


Dec 10, 2011, 7:10 PM
Post #219 of 245 (13593 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 8, 2011
Posts: 14

Re: [ChalkIsCheap] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

-40. Just goes to prove this is a flawed system. Then again, the only reason I have most of what I do is because of a CL score of new gear off some guy who blew his load on a dozen Petzl draws and a good rope/bag only to decide he didn't like falling while top roping.


jt512


Dec 10, 2011, 10:20 PM
Post #220 of 245 (13575 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [andrewluke] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

andrewluke wrote:
-40. Just goes to prove this is a flawed system.

The butthurt continues.

File the form:




Colinhoglund


Dec 12, 2011, 5:49 AM
Post #221 of 245 (13478 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 5, 2008
Posts: 338

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

My points

Risk factor 1: Helmet
Climber is wearing a helmet belaying: 10 points

I live in the rockies, choss is abundant . . .

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
Does not have a grigri: 10 points
I prefer a Mammut Smart.

Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points
Dogbones too skinny to grab: 10 points

Mostly BD draws, some skinny slings, -5

Risk factor 6: Rope bag
Non-Metolius: 5 points

MEC makes a great metolius alternative . . .

Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
10 points for each locking carabiner on the climber's harness not clipped to a belay device

Standard practice here is Part "J"
http://www.petzl.com/...ing_Catalog-2010.pdf

Risk factor 10: The color red
One point for pack if that counts . . .

I get a 46, which is confirmed, visiting traddie.
Forgive me for liking my helmet, Smart and extra biner (cumulative 30pts).


ilikepargo


Dec 22, 2011, 6:24 AM
Post #222 of 245 (13310 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2008
Posts: 133

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

95 = Sadness.

It didn't help me that that my Heliums are red with skinny dogbones. That was 27 points right there.

It also didn't help me that I keep an ATC for rapping in addition to my Gri-Gri. Or that Mad Rock Demons make my toes happy. (At least they aren't red. Most of my previous shoes have been.)

Edit = My rope bag is red. +1 = 96. Frown

Edit = Uh oh. I recalculated. 105. Frown Frown Frown


(This post was edited by ilikepargo on Jan 2, 2012, 8:01 PM)


ilikepargo


Dec 22, 2011, 6:30 AM
Post #223 of 245 (13305 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2008
Posts: 133

Re: [andrewluke] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

andrewluke wrote:
-40. Just goes to prove this is a flawed system. Then again, the only reason I have most of what I do is because of a CL score of new gear off some guy who blew his load on a dozen Petzl draws and a good rope/bag only to decide he didn't like falling while top roping.
LOLzzzzezz!!!!


jae8908


Jan 9, 2012, 4:22 AM
Post #224 of 245 (13064 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 15, 2011
Posts: 270

Re: [Colinhoglund] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Colinhoglund wrote:
Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
10 points for each locking carabiner on the climber's harness not clipped to a belay device

Standard practice here is Part "J"
http://www.petzl.com/...ing_Catalog-2010.pdf

(cumulative 30pts).

But the question is do you walk around with the biner hanging off your harness all of the time? Also, contrary to the manual, most people I know and see, at least where I climb, rappel down to save wear and tear on the rings.


Colinhoglund


Jan 9, 2012, 5:44 AM
Post #225 of 245 (13049 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 5, 2008
Posts: 338

Re: [jae8908] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Pretty much . . . One 40g biner Isn't going to prevent me from sending. Plus, I'm used to having up to a double set of cams on my harness, 14 draws and a locker feels light.


ilikepargo


Jan 12, 2012, 4:59 PM
Post #226 of 245 (15613 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2008
Posts: 133

Re: [GabeWalker] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't think I'd be able to pronounce "Kyrgyzstan" without hurting myself. That doesn't add any points does it?


eric_k


Jan 21, 2012, 11:03 AM
Post #227 of 245 (15553 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 190

Re: [ilikepargo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

40 points, but I use my Mammut rope bag with pride.

My Arcteryx harness is much nicer than the Petzl harnesses I have tried, and I got it for $50!

Even when I am no longer a n00b I will probably still be girth hitching a single sling to my harness to anchor in at the chains.

When I need one I make a stick clip out of a long stick and some tape. Once I am finished I remove the tape and return the stick to nature.

I probably am n00b but don't think I will change any time soon.

Eric

Edited to fix crappy grammar


(This post was edited by eric_k on Jan 21, 2012, 11:06 AM)


freeclimber92


Apr 7, 2012, 12:56 AM
Post #228 of 245 (15341 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2012
Posts: 4

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

No Helmet yet. 0
Damn you tesstarossa 10
Black Diamond 5
I have my grigri2 for belay and atc for rap off anchors 10
I have a mess of draws some BD (live wire and posiwire) and Petzl (ange s) -50?
No Rope bag yet 20
No stick Clip 10
No Girth 0
No REI 0
Red tesstarossa 1

I have a score of 6!!!


jt512


Apr 7, 2012, 1:33 AM
Post #229 of 245 (15332 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [freeclimber92] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

freeclimber92 wrote:
No Helmet yet. 0
Damn you tesstarossa 10
Black Diamond 5
I have my grigri2 for belay and atc for rap off anchors 10
I have a mess of draws some BD (live wire and posiwire) and Petzl (ange s) -50?
No Rope bag yet 20
No stick Clip 10
No Girth 0
No REI 0
Red tesstarossa 1

I have a score of 6!!!

Your score is 106. You don't get the -50 points for your non-logo Petzl draws, plus you get another 50 for thinking that you do.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Apr 7, 2012, 1:35 AM)


freeclimber92


Apr 7, 2012, 6:05 AM
Post #230 of 245 (15286 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2012
Posts: 4

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh well Im n00b then!


shotwell


Apr 7, 2012, 2:03 PM
Post #231 of 245 (15264 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
freeclimber92 wrote:
No Helmet yet. 0
Damn you tesstarossa 10
Black Diamond 5
I have my grigri2 for belay and atc for rap off anchors 10
I have a mess of draws some BD (live wire and posiwire) and Petzl (ange s) -50?
No Rope bag yet 20
No stick Clip 10
No Girth 0
No REI 0
Red tesstarossa 1

I have a score of 6!!!

Your score is 106. You don't get the -50 points for your non-logo Petzl draws, plus you get another 50 for thinking that you do.

Jay

Actually the score should be even higher if those draws have the stock 'bones. The Livewire draws have big 'bones, but the Posiwire and Ange draws both have 'bones too skinny to grab. Depending on how many of these he has, the score could be even more frightening.

I'm going to start running now, just on the outside chance that he is climbing anywhere reasonably near me.


tready


Apr 7, 2012, 6:38 PM
Post #232 of 245 (15251 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 10, 2007
Posts: 166

Re: [shotwell] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

What happens if the person in questions still has their stuff in a backpack of some sort? Is there something you can do in case you can't see their draws, harness, etc... when they ask you?

Edit: Now that I think about it, that probably wouldn't happen given the scenario, but I'm still curious.


(This post was edited by tready on Apr 7, 2012, 6:44 PM)


ilikepargo


Jun 13, 2012, 12:12 AM
Post #233 of 245 (14875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2008
Posts: 133

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I just looked over the test again. My score is higher than I thought. AND I just recently bought an REI backpack to carry my stuff. Plus I grabbed a couple of MadRock 'biners to hang a couple of things on the outside of it. They're red.

I can't count that high.

Frown


kf8mo


Aug 9, 2012, 4:10 AM
Post #234 of 245 (14611 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 31, 2012
Posts: 15

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

> Climber wore a helmet on the approach: 25 points

What if I wore my helmet on the approach to keep the sun from burning my balding head? Not having a bad hair day, just a no hair day...


jt512


Aug 9, 2012, 4:18 AM
Post #235 of 245 (14608 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kf8mo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kf8mo wrote:
> Climber wore a helmet on the approach: 25 points

What if I wore my helmet on the approach to keep the sun from burning my balding head? Not having a bad hair day, just a no hair day...

25 points. No exceptions. Plus 100 points for making this the subject of your first post on this site.

However, as a demonstration of my magnanimity I shall deduct 25 points from your score for your having prefaced a quote with '>' because it suggests you might have some Linux/Unix experience in your background.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 9, 2012, 6:11 AM)


majid_sabet


Aug 9, 2012, 4:27 AM
Post #236 of 245 (14601 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [ilikepargo] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ilikepargo wrote:
I don't think I'd be able to pronounce "Kyrgyzstan" without hurting myself. That doesn't add any points does it?

Gher_ghe_ghe Zstan

Stan means state or state of Gherghi or Kyrgyz-stan


sungam


Aug 9, 2012, 7:39 AM
Post #237 of 245 (14582 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
kf8mo wrote:
> Climber wore a helmet on the approach: 25 points

What if I wore my helmet on the approach to keep the sun from burning my balding head? Not having a bad hair day, just a no hair day...

25 points. No exceptions. Plus 100 points for making this the subject of your first post on this site.

However, as a demonstration of my magnanimity I shall deduct 25 points from your score for your having prefaced a quote with '>' because it suggests you might have some Linux/Unix experience in your background.

Jay
Be careful Jay - It might also mean they're from Reddit.


kf8mo


Aug 9, 2012, 12:35 PM
Post #238 of 245 (14570 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 31, 2012
Posts: 15

Re: [sungam] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

> Be careful Jay - It might also mean they're from Reddit.

Perish the thought! Recovering Solaris sysadmin; now Linux.

I have a BD rope bag, but it's yellow. Anyone know where I can get a red one? ;-)


robx


Oct 3, 2012, 5:04 PM
Post #239 of 245 (14260 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 11, 2011
Posts: 108

Re: [sungam] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I use a red backpack AND red rope bag (black diamond at least). I also have like, 4 different kinds of draws because I lose stuff and am scatterbrained. That and using a gri (go) for belay but atc for rap make me a super noob.
Also arcteryx harnesses are so much better than petzl. Just got one on clearance and am blown away by how much more comfortable it is.

I also climb with a helmet, but only when I don't leave it in the car.


ilikepargo


Oct 9, 2012, 2:23 AM
Post #240 of 245 (14152 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2008
Posts: 133

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
kf8mo wrote:
> Climber wore a helmet on the approach: 25 points

What if I wore my helmet on the approach to keep the sun from burning my balding head? Not having a bad hair day, just a no hair day...

25 points. No exceptions. Plus 100 points for making this the subject of your first post on this site.

However, as a demonstration of my magnanimity I shall deduct 25 points from your score for your having prefaced a quote with '>' because it suggests you might have some Linux/Unix experience in your background.

Jay

Only 25 for the helmet ON THE APPROACH??? Wow. You're lenient. In the past I used to bring my helmet along, just so that I could stuff my lunch in it. (On the theory that doing so would make it tougher for the Malibu Creek rats to steal my food.) These days I rarely even take it with me. Unless I'm in a place that is raining rocks, I'd never wear it on the approach.


circello


Nov 5, 2012, 2:57 PM
Post #241 of 245 (13919 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 31, 2006
Posts: 69

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

5 stars for sure

2 - Helmet

10 - Katanas

10 - ATC-XP

10 - No Gri-Gri

5 - BD ropebag (hate it, want the metolius one)

10 - No stick clip (prefer the old fashioned kind when necessary)

Grand Total : 47!


CrimpyFever


Jan 17, 2013, 3:56 AM
Post #242 of 245 (13485 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 17, 2013
Posts: 6

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

How many points is a full body harness?


dagibbs


Jan 17, 2013, 7:31 PM
Post #243 of 245 (13412 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2007
Posts: 921

Re: [CrimpyFever] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

CrimpyFever wrote:
How many points is a full body harness?

Depends on how they're built, and how you count points -- but at least 4-points.


jorgegonzalez


Jan 18, 2013, 8:42 PM
Post #244 of 245 (13352 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 17, 2005
Posts: 144

Re: [dagibbs] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If you read every page on this thread:

100 points!

You win!


MikeDierson


Feb 7, 2013, 8:00 PM
Post #245 of 245 (13166 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 7, 2013
Posts: 18

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
You're at the sport crag waiting for your partner to arrive, an unkown climber walks up to you, and asks, "Hey, you want a belay?" You're on the spot. You'd like to get a warm-up burn in, but you don't want to end up on the wrong end of some hapless gymbie's rope. If you hesitate before answering, you risk offense. You must be definitive. It's either got to be, "Sure, that would be great," or "No thanks. I'm still a little hungover." You need a way to size up your potential partner that is systematic, fast, and accurate. In short, you need a

Screening Test for N00bs


Through years of keen observation, I have identified 10 key risk factors for n00bs. Give the climber the number of points indicated for each risk factor. Then sum the points to arrive at the climber's n00b risk score.

Risk factor 1: Helmet
Climber has a helmet at the crag: 2 points
Climber is wearing a helmet belaying: 10 points
Climber wore a helmet on the approach: 25 points
Climber got out of car wearing helmet: 100 points

Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
Climber's shoes, if not slippers, are made from natural leather: 10 points*
Climber's shoes are made by Mad Rock: 10 points
*Exception 1: Climber's shoes are Firés: -50 points
*Exception 2: Climber's shoes are EBs: -100 points

Risk factor 3: Harness
Any modern harness not made by Petzl: 5 points

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
Give the climber 10^n points, where n is the number of belay devices on the climber's harness in excess of one.
In addition:
Does not have a grigri: 10 points
Has a Cinch: 10 points
Has a device whose brand name is "ATC" followed by something: 10 points

Risk factor 5: Quick draws
Anything other than Petzl: 5 points
Dogbones too skinny to grab: 10 points
Petzl logo on dogbones: -50 points

Risk factor 6: Rope bag
Non-Metolius: 5 points
None: 20 points

Risk factor 7: Stick clip
None: 10 points

Risk factor 8: Unnecessary equipment
10^n points, where n is the number of items girth hitched to the climber's harness
10 points for each locking carabiner on the climber's harness not clipped to a belay device
50 points for each quick link on the climber's harness

Risk factor 9: REI
1 point for each appearance of the REI logo on the climber's gear
20 points for each appearance of an REI price tag on the climber's gear
100 points for an REI shopping bag containing the climber's gear

Risk factor 10: The color red
1 point for each red item among the climber's gear, unless the gear is unscratched; then, 10 points.
Red grigri: 15 points

Scoring:
100 or more: Run away.
50–99 points: High n00b probability. Climb with at your own risk.
25–49 points: Possibly a n00b or a visiting trad climber.
0–24 points: Probably an experienced sport climber.
Less than 0: The climber probably knows more about climbing than you do.

In my country:
Sport Climber = Child/n00b
Traditional Climber = loftful


Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Sport Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook