|
sittingduck
Jun 17, 2010, 9:04 PM
Post #26 of 89
(3367 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 19, 2003
Posts: 338
|
Great thread! If you where writing a top-rope-how-to book with your name on the cover, would you recommend the setup you use on a daily basis, or maybe add a locker?
|
|
|
|
|
kjaking
Jun 17, 2010, 9:13 PM
Post #27 of 89
(3360 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 13, 2009
Posts: 35
|
csproul wrote: kjaking wrote: bill413 wrote: As for using lockers at the top of sport climbs - if all you will be doing is TR, OK. However, if you will occaisionally be pulling the rope for someone else to lead up, having a locked biner at your anchor is a pain. Give me two non-lockers there. I still don't get how a locker is a pain. Its the same thing, it just doesn't open unless you want it to. Or do we need to argue about what a locker is? Picture this; The first leader climbs the route and the rope is put through two locked lockers at the top of a route for several people to TR. Now, you pull it because you have decided to lead the route. You lead the climb (imagine it's a hard climb) and get to the anchors, where you can barely hang on to clip the anchors. Only now, you have to deal with two locked biners instead of just clipping the anchors. Get it now? Thats why people grab slings, but I get it.
|
|
|
|
|
sp00ki
Jun 17, 2010, 9:23 PM
Post #28 of 89
(3349 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 2, 2009
Posts: 552
|
jt512 wrote: kjaking wrote: jt512 wrote: gmggg wrote: +1 for having a locker in the top rope anchor. It is safer... I get the feeling that the italicized "is" means that this is a belief not based on any evidence; that is, you are assuming the conclusion of the argument. In reply to: ... it is generally equipment on hand, and it is just as easy to rig. And that is not true in a typical sport climbing scenario. Jay How is it more difficult to rig a toprope with a locker? because that one befuddles me. I only mean that when sport climbing, it would be unusual to have a draw with a locker on it with you. Hence, top ropes on sport routes are usually comprised of just two ordinary draws. Jay 1) if you have a quickdraw and you have a locker, you also easily have a quickdraw with a locker on it. Not having at least one locker at a sport crag is virtually unheard of. 2) you misused comprised.
(This post was edited by sp00ki on Jun 17, 2010, 9:24 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jun 17, 2010, 9:25 PM
Post #29 of 89
(3345 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
sittingduck wrote: Great thread! If you where writing a top-rope-how-to book with your name on the cover, would you recommend the setup you use on a daily basis, or maybe add a locker? Good question. When you write a book, you have to be very conservative, so, based on these results, I'd probably say that a minimum setup would be a locker and a non-locker. But there is nothing here that convinces me, that for my own purposes, two non-locking quickdraws is inadequate. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
gmggg
Jun 17, 2010, 9:43 PM
Post #30 of 89
(3326 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099
|
jt512 wrote: gmggg wrote: jt512 wrote: gmggg wrote: +1 for having a locker in the top rope anchor. It is safer... I get the feeling that the italicized "is" means that this is a belief not based on any evidence; that is, you are assuming the conclusion of the argument. In reply to: ... it is generally equipment on hand, and it is just as easy to rig. And that is not true in a typical sport climbing scenario. Jay I don't know that I'm assuming the conclusion of #1. If your safety concerns are predicated on the possibility of open gates, then a device that mitigates that likelihood is safer. Only if the combined open-gate strength of the two non-locking biners can be exceeded. So, the conclusion you are assuming, is that they can. Jay Hey, it was your hypothetical buddy. Like I said, generally the equipment is at hand and I don't see why I wouldn't use it. Like I said, if someone else didn't use a locker, or if I didn't have one handy I wouldn't bail. I never made any sort of all or nothing declaration.
|
|
|
|
|
IsayAutumn
Jun 17, 2010, 9:43 PM
Post #31 of 89
(3326 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 8, 2008
Posts: 355
|
jt512 wrote: sittingduck wrote: Great thread! If you where writing a top-rope-how-to book with your name on the cover, would you recommend the setup you use on a daily basis, or maybe add a locker? Good question. When you write a book, you have to be very conservative, so, based on these results, I'd probably say that a minimum setup would be a locker and a non-locker. But there is nothing here that convinces me, that for my own purposes, two non-locking quickdraws is inadequate. Jay Of course they are perfectly adequate! This is an interesting thread only because you took it so far as to be comical. The debate is academic. Either one is equally safe because both are "good enough."
(This post was edited by IsayAutumn on Jun 17, 2010, 9:53 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Jun 17, 2010, 9:49 PM
Post #32 of 89
(3319 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
sp00ki wrote: 1) if you have a quickdraw and you have a locker, you also easily have a quickdraw with a locker on it. Not having at least one locker at a sport crag is virtually unheard of. Really? The only locker I generally take sport climbing is my belay locker. I haven't used a locker on a sport climb/sport anchor in 8 years.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jun 17, 2010, 9:51 PM
Post #33 of 89
(3312 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
gmggg wrote: jt512 wrote: gmggg wrote: jt512 wrote: gmggg wrote: +1 for having a locker in the top rope anchor. It is safer... I get the feeling that the italicized "is" means that this is a belief not based on any evidence; that is, you are assuming the conclusion of the argument. In reply to: ... it is generally equipment on hand, and it is just as easy to rig. And that is not true in a typical sport climbing scenario. Jay I don't know that I'm assuming the conclusion of #1. If your safety concerns are predicated on the possibility of open gates, then a device that mitigates that likelihood is safer. Only if the combined open-gate strength of the two non-locking biners can be exceeded. So, the conclusion you are assuming, is that they can. Jay Hey, it was your hypothetical buddy. You're missing the point of the post. The results aren't meant to be conclusive, but to stimulate discussion. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Jun 17, 2010, 9:52 PM
Post #34 of 89
(3308 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
jt512 wrote: sittingduck wrote: Great thread! If you where writing a top-rope-how-to book with your name on the cover, would you recommend the setup you use on a daily basis, or maybe add a locker? Good question. When you write a book, you have to be very conservative, so, based on these results, I'd probably say that a minimum setup would be a locker and a non-locker. But there is nothing here that convinces me, that for my own purposes, two non-locking quickdraws is inadequate. Jay I learned a fair bit from the old Long anchor books, and I recall (don't have those books anymore) that it said two non locking opposite and opposed biners was adequate. This suggestion that a locker on the power point is mandatory is news to me, but I haven't read the new version of Long's anchor book. I don't generally use a locker on the anchor. Sometimes I do, but if so it's generally one of three biners on the anchor. If you just have two, and one is a locker, and one is a wiregate, the barrel of the locker gets in the way so that the spines don't lie flush, and if one biner rolls and the gates are on the same side, it seems like the barrel could press on the gate of the other biner.
|
|
|
|
|
gmggg
Jun 17, 2010, 10:01 PM
Post #35 of 89
(3300 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099
|
jt512 wrote: gmggg wrote: jt512 wrote: gmggg wrote: jt512 wrote: gmggg wrote: +1 for having a locker in the top rope anchor. It is safer... I get the feeling that the italicized "is" means that this is a belief not based on any evidence; that is, you are assuming the conclusion of the argument. In reply to: ... it is generally equipment on hand, and it is just as easy to rig. And that is not true in a typical sport climbing scenario. Jay I don't know that I'm assuming the conclusion of #1. If your safety concerns are predicated on the possibility of open gates, then a device that mitigates that likelihood is safer. Only if the combined open-gate strength of the two non-locking biners can be exceeded. So, the conclusion you are assuming, is that they can. Jay Hey, it was your hypothetical buddy. You're missing the point of the post. The results aren't meant to be conclusive, but to stimulate discussion. Jay Maybe. And maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
ptlong
Jun 17, 2010, 10:10 PM
Post #36 of 89
(3288 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 4, 2007
Posts: 418
|
caughtinside wrote: jt512 wrote: When you write a book, you have to be very conservative, so, based on these results, I'd probably say that a minimum setup would be a locker and a non-locker. But there is nothing here that convinces me, that for my own purposes, two non-locking quickdraws is inadequate. Jay I learned a fair bit from the old Long anchor books, and I recall (don't have those books anymore) that it said two non locking opposite and opposed biners was adequate. This suggestion that a locker on the power point is mandatory is news to me, but I haven't read the new version of Long's anchor book. At least a couple of the more recent Long books do say to include a locker. Is that because more has been learned? Here's a clip from a respected how-to book from the early 1980s:
(This post was edited by ptlong on Jun 17, 2010, 10:12 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
sittingduck
Jun 17, 2010, 10:10 PM
Post #37 of 89
(3287 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 19, 2003
Posts: 338
|
jt512 wrote: But there is nothing here that convinces me, that for my own purposes, two non-locking quickdraws is inadequate. You have no master-point with two quick-draws, so the two carabiners are kind of separated. If the direction of pull changes you will weight only one of the carabiners. If you use a long runner with a fig 8 master-point, the opp&opp carabiners would hang parallell to each other. Both carabiners would be loaded equally, regardless of the direction of pull. If the fig 8 anchor is safer than the q-d anchor, then maybe the q-d anchor need a locker?
|
|
|
|
|
ptlong
Jun 17, 2010, 10:20 PM
Post #39 of 89
(3269 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 4, 2007
Posts: 418
|
jt512 wrote: Is that image from Michael Loughman's book? Yes, it is. It's still a great resource for the basics of movement.
In reply to: That book was my bible when I was learning, and Michael's wife was kinda hot in a sort of Daisy-Duke-meets-Camp-4 way. Long, lonely nights of youth, reading the bible, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Jun 17, 2010, 10:21 PM
Post #40 of 89
(3264 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
ptlong wrote: caughtinside wrote: jt512 wrote: When you write a book, you have to be very conservative, so, based on these results, I'd probably say that a minimum setup would be a locker and a non-locker. But there is nothing here that convinces me, that for my own purposes, two non-locking quickdraws is inadequate. Jay I learned a fair bit from the old Long anchor books, and I recall (don't have those books anymore) that it said two non locking opposite and opposed biners was adequate. This suggestion that a locker on the power point is mandatory is news to me, but I haven't read the new version of Long's anchor book. At least a couple of the more recent Long books do say to include a locker. Is that because more has been learned? Here's a clip from a respected how-to book from the early 1980s: I'm not sure what book that's from or what that sling is connected to... but I'd probably climb on it. YMMV.
|
|
|
|
|
sp00ki
Jun 17, 2010, 10:25 PM
Post #41 of 89
(3261 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 2, 2009
Posts: 552
|
caughtinside wrote: sp00ki wrote: 1) if you have a quickdraw and you have a locker, you also easily have a quickdraw with a locker on it. Not having at least one locker at a sport crag is virtually unheard of. Really? The only locker I generally take sport climbing is my belay locker. I haven't used a locker on a sport climb/sport anchor in 8 years. You REALLY only have one locker in your bag when you climb? I always keep four: two for cleaning, one for belaying, one just in case. But even if you only had one, isn't it likely that your partner will have at least one too? It doesn't really seem excessive once you acknowledge that they last a really long time.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jun 17, 2010, 10:28 PM
Post #42 of 89
(3254 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
sp00ki wrote: caughtinside wrote: sp00ki wrote: 1) if you have a quickdraw and you have a locker, you also easily have a quickdraw with a locker on it. Not having at least one locker at a sport crag is virtually unheard of. Really? The only locker I generally take sport climbing is my belay locker. I haven't used a locker on a sport climb/sport anchor in 8 years. You REALLY only have one locker in your bag when you climb? I always keep four: two for cleaning, one for belaying, one just in case. There are well-known inverse relations between the number of years a person has climbed, and the number of lockers, hexes, belay devices, and yards of webbing he carries. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Jun 17, 2010, 10:29 PM
Post #43 of 89
(3253 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
sp00ki wrote: caughtinside wrote: sp00ki wrote: 1) if you have a quickdraw and you have a locker, you also easily have a quickdraw with a locker on it. Not having at least one locker at a sport crag is virtually unheard of. Really? The only locker I generally take sport climbing is my belay locker. I haven't used a locker on a sport climb/sport anchor in 8 years. You REALLY only have one locker in your bag when you climb? I always keep four: two for cleaning, one for belaying, one just in case. But even if you only had one, isn't it likely that your partner will have at least one too? It doesn't really seem excessive once you acknowledge that they last a really long time. You're right, lockers last nearly forever, except for belay lockers. I carried them in my bag and used them on lots of anchors for a couple years. Then I wised up, and just put two draws on every anchor. I stopped carrying the extra lockers because they were unnecessary, and now they live at the bottom of the gear bin. My bag is usually full of trad gear, and gets dumped all out when I throw in the quickdraws. To clean, I anchor in with draws. NBD. I don't know if my partners have extra lockers, never asked because I didn't need them.
|
|
|
|
|
suprasoup
Jun 17, 2010, 10:40 PM
Post #44 of 89
(3234 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2005
Posts: 309
|
jt512 wrote: sp00ki wrote: caughtinside wrote: sp00ki wrote: 1) if you have a quickdraw and you have a locker, you also easily have a quickdraw with a locker on it. Not having at least one locker at a sport crag is virtually unheard of. Really? The only locker I generally take sport climbing is my belay locker. I haven't used a locker on a sport climb/sport anchor in 8 years. You REALLY only have one locker in your bag when you climb? I always keep four: two for cleaning, one for belaying, one just in case. There are well-known inverse relations between the number of years a person has climbed, and the number of lockers, hexes, belay devices, and yards of webbing he carries. Jay Hmmm. So it's fair to say that in a couple of years you'll finally be a pebble wrestler right?
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jun 17, 2010, 10:45 PM
Post #45 of 89
(3229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
suprasoup wrote: jt512 wrote: sp00ki wrote: caughtinside wrote: sp00ki wrote: 1) if you have a quickdraw and you have a locker, you also easily have a quickdraw with a locker on it. Not having at least one locker at a sport crag is virtually unheard of. Really? The only locker I generally take sport climbing is my belay locker. I haven't used a locker on a sport climb/sport anchor in 8 years. You REALLY only have one locker in your bag when you climb? I always keep four: two for cleaning, one for belaying, one just in case. There are well-known inverse relations between the number of years a person has climbed, and the number of lockers, hexes, belay devices, and yards of webbing he carries. Jay Hmmm. So it's fair to say that in a couple of years you'll finally be a pebble wrestler right? I didn't say the relations were linear! Jay
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Jun 17, 2010, 11:26 PM
Post #47 of 89
(3206 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
jt512 wrote: ptlong wrote: Here's a clip from a respected how-to book from the early 1980s: [img]http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/1001/60967083.jpg[/img] Is that image from Michael Loughman's book? That book was my bible when I was learning, and Michael's wife was kinda hot in a sort of Daisy-Duke-meets-Camp-4 way. Jay She still is. Still got 'the legs' too. An elvish beauty that transcends time! I'm an analog climber so the indepth analysis is appreciated - its thinking I would never bother with on my own. If I happen to have a locker for a TR setup, I'll use it. If I don't, I won't sweat it really. If its a TR anchor that will see multiple ascents I might throw in 3rd biner, on feeling alone. I'm not so caught up in minimalism for it to be important to me to use 'just the right amount every time. Sometimes I rig spaghetti anchors just because I can! Hah! DMT
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jun 17, 2010, 11:28 PM
Post #48 of 89
(3202 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
dingus wrote: jt512 wrote: ptlong wrote: Here's a clip from a respected how-to book from the early 1980s: [img]http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/1001/60967083.jpg[/img] Is that image from Michael Loughman's book? That book was my bible when I was learning, and Michael's wife was kinda hot in a sort of Daisy-Duke-meets-Camp-4 way. Jay She still is. So you know the Loughmans? Are they still climbing? Jay
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Jun 17, 2010, 11:38 PM
Post #50 of 89
(3195 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
jt512 wrote: dingus wrote: jt512 wrote: ptlong wrote: Here's a clip from a respected how-to book from the early 1980s: [img]http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/1001/60967083.jpg[/img] Is that image from Michael Loughman's book? That book was my bible when I was learning, and Michael's wife was kinda hot in a sort of Daisy-Duke-meets-Camp-4 way. Jay She still is. So you know the Loughmans? Are they still climbing? Jay No longer a plural. I've never met Michael and that book of his holds a place of prominence in my lil ole library, as well. Simplicity! I love the basics of movement and rope systems in there. I learned so much from that book too. I've met her fairly recently climbing up at the Pass with a good friend of mine. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
|