Forums: Climbing Information: Accident and Incident Analysis:
Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Accident and Incident Analysis

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All


Tipton


Jun 28, 2010, 9:11 PM
Post #26 of 133 (11196 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2007
Posts: 272

Re: [boymeetsrock] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

boymeetsrock wrote:
+1

And to Those of you who can't read, please go back and try again. Bill was clear about where the fixed lines were and what they were for. And this is not his third rescue. One mentioned rescue was of a friend of his. The other was an unfortunate ground fall he took (not soloing if I understood correctly, but not totally sure right now).

Josh, your comments seem right on from what I can read.

Again, best wishes to Bill and Tom. Proud objective, sad outcome.

I never said anything about soloing. This:

In reply to:
Earlier in my climbing career they rescued my partner off of Castle Rock when he dislocated his shoulder. In 1999, they rescued me from Death and Transfiguration when I fell 70 feet to the ground and broke my back.
(taken from the blog)

implies that he was involved in a rescue at Castle Rock, one on Death and Transfiguration, and one on Redguard.

I'm not wishing ill on any of the parties involved, just surprised at the frequency of accidents this poor guy is involved in. Most people aren't involved in a single rescue in their climbing career and he's at 2, possibly 3. Hopefully the injured will have a speedy recovery.

Edit: Grammar


(This post was edited by Tipton on Jun 28, 2010, 9:13 PM)


billl7


Jun 28, 2010, 9:47 PM
Post #27 of 133 (11173 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1890

Re: [Tipton] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Tipton wrote:
I'm not wishing ill on any of the parties involved, just surprised at the frequency of accidents this poor guy is involved in. Most people aren't involved in a single rescue in their climbing career and he's at 2, possibly 3.
There's quite a range in what one might call a "career" ... the guy who climbs all his life but only follows someone else one weekend a month ... the gal who climbs everyone weekend for five years and moves onto something else ... the guy who got layed off two years ago when the US economy took a dump and has quadrupled the amount of climbing since then compared to the previous four years.


Partner cracklover


Jun 28, 2010, 10:43 PM
Post #28 of 133 (11133 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [robdotcalm] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Great writeup. Thanks for the link.

First of all, I hope Tom has a full and a speedy recovery. And I hope Bill does too; he's gotta be emotionally devastated.

Second, that was a proud objective. I'm so sorry it turned out so badly.

Third - okay, analysis? Really, the only thing that can be said is that it might have been better if they'd taken a double rack and placed more gear, or exchanged gear more often. Sure, that would have required more time and more effort, and would have made the goal that much harder. Point is - they made their choice, and will have to live with the consequences. I don't judge them! I might make my choice differently, but we all make 1000s of choices that could render us dead or alive while climbing. That's the name of the game.

Only other point is that it sounds like Tom's life was clearly saved by his helmet.

And, of course, by the rescue personnel. Kudos to them.

GO


sspssp


Jun 28, 2010, 10:46 PM
Post #29 of 133 (11129 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 2, 2003
Posts: 1731

Re: [billl7] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I am glad to hear that everyone survived.

I can understand climbing up in the hope that the injured climber would eventually lower enough to reach a ledge. It sounds like that almost/kind of happened.

The alternative I wonder about: Could he have tied off the belay rope sooner? I didn't catch whether the rope leading down to the leader was within reach after the fall. If it was, could that rope have been tied off with a prussic or sling. He could then climb up a few feet, to get some slack, and then tie the rope off to an anchor. (Or perhaps he could have climbed up to the first placed piece in order to have something to tie into).

So if he got to one or more pieces that he considered a sufficient anchor and got the leader tied off. He could clip into the anchor. Untie, pull the rope and then have free rope to rap down to the victim. Once you get to the victim, set up another anchor, clip him in, and go from there.


boymeetsrock


Jun 28, 2010, 10:47 PM
Post #30 of 133 (11127 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709

Re: [Tipton] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Tipton wrote:
I never said anything about soloing.

I wasn't saying you did. I was only qualifying my statement. Many people believe soloing to be irresponsible, and accidents soloing even more so.


Tipton wrote:
This:
In reply to:
Earlier in my climbing career they rescued my partner off of Castle Rock when he dislocated his shoulder. In 1999, they rescued me from Death and Transfiguration when I fell 70 feet to the ground and broke my back.
(taken from the blog)

implies that he was involved in a rescue at Castle Rock, one on Death and Transfiguration, and one on Redguard.

No it doesn't. It implies his partner was involved in a rescue, at Castle Rock. The vast majority of climbers I know refer to all of their climbing buddies as "partner" whether or not they are physically climbing together at the time or not. (Sampling bias, I know...)

Tipton wrote:
I'm not wishing ill on any of the parties involved, just surprised at the frequency of accidents this poor guy is involved in. Most people aren't involved in a single rescue in their climbing career and he's at 2, possibly 3. Hopefully the injured will have a speedy recovery.

I'll concede, I don't know if Bill was involved in three accidents or not. I certainly feel for the guy for the accidents he has experienced. But what essentially amounts to slander up thread is uncalled for. Far better climbers than we have been involved in multiple accidents and rescues because they decided to push the envelope. The fact that someone needed rescue does not in and of itself condemn their actions.

Just because you or I have gotten lucky when we've made poor choices or mistakes doesn't give us the right to condemn others who've been less lucky.

Tipton, I'm not calling YOU out. You weren't the only one to comment on the number of Bill's accidents. I just disagree with that line of reasoning at this point in the discussion is all...


majid_sabet


Jun 28, 2010, 11:06 PM
Post #31 of 133 (11118 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [flamer] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

flamer wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
This was one of the most dangerous self-rescue project I have ever heard with such a poor planning. climbing a tensioned rope ( with an injured climber at the end)on a piece that just took 100 feet of FF2 with no extra rope or gear was a bad idea especially when your action did not do anything other than jeopardizing your own lives.

You need to reread what Bill wrote.
At no time did he climb the tensioned line.
FF2 with that much rope out and pure dynamic(ie counter-weight) belay? Extremely doubtful.

josh

josh

from his blog

I continued moving up the crack until I was about fifteen feet below the piece holding us. At this point the crack above was too side for any gear, so I constructed a belay here from the #3 and the #3.5 Camalots, equalizing them to the weight from an upward pull towards the #2 Camalot above. Once this was done I put two prussiks on the rope and attached them to the belay. Now when I moved up a bit more the Tom’s weight was held by the prusiks and finally the rope to me went slack.




(This post was edited by majid_sabet on Jun 29, 2010, 6:05 AM)


sspssp


Jun 28, 2010, 11:21 PM
Post #32 of 133 (11099 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 2, 2003
Posts: 1731

Re: [majid_sabet] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think you guys are talking about two different things.

He climbed while the leaders weight was on his harness.

He didn't untie from the rope and prussic up a tensioned rope.


billl7


Jun 28, 2010, 11:22 PM
Post #33 of 133 (11096 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1890

Re: [majid_sabet] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
flamer wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
This was one of the most dangerous self-rescue project I have ever heard with such a poor planning. climbing a tensioned rope ( with an injured climber at the end)on a piece that just took 100 feet of FF2 with no extra rope or gear was a bad idea especially when your action did not do anything other than jeopardizing your own lives.

You need to reread what Bill wrote.
At no time did he climb the tensioned line.
FF2 with that much rope out and pure dynamic(ie counter-weight) belay? Extremely doubtful.

from his blog

I continued moving up the crack until I was about fifteen feet below the piece holding us. At this point the crack above was too side for any gear, so I constructed a belay here from the #3 and the #3.5 Camalots, equalizing them to the weight from an upward pull towards the #2 Camalot above. Once this was done I put two prussiks on the rope and attached them to the belay. Now when I moved up a bit more the Tom’s weight was held by the prusiks and finally the rope to me went slack.
Majid - I still don't see the FF2 or the ascension of a tensioned rope. Bill


majid_sabet


Jun 29, 2010, 12:25 AM
Post #34 of 133 (11056 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [billl7] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

billl7 wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
flamer wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
This was one of the most dangerous self-rescue project I have ever heard with such a poor planning. climbing a tensioned rope ( with an injured climber at the end)on a piece that just took 100 feet of FF2 with no extra rope or gear was a bad idea especially when your action did not do anything other than jeopardizing your own lives.

You need to reread what Bill wrote.
At no time did he climb the tensioned line.
FF2 with that much rope out and pure dynamic(ie counter-weight) belay? Extremely doubtful.

from his blog

I continued moving up the crack until I was about fifteen feet below the piece holding us. At this point the crack above was too side for any gear, so I constructed a belay here from the #3 and the #3.5 Camalots, equalizing them to the weight from an upward pull towards the #2 Camalot above. Once this was done I put two prussiks on the rope and attached them to the belay. Now when I moved up a bit more the Tom’s weight was held by the prusiks and finally the rope to me went slack.
Majid - I still don't see the FF2 or the ascension of a tensioned rope. Bill

Bill

He climbed a tensioned rope meaning his partner was at the end of his line so when he was climbing, his partner was been lowered (pulley action) . This whole thing was taken place on a cam that just took 100 footer . If he had a second rope then he was able to escape belay and secure the top piece, rap down, assess the situation and fix another anchor then lower partner via second rope instead, he was planning to fix the top piece and rap down via prusic on a rope that had climber hanging on it. What I like to know was his plan C after he got down to the injured climber . Set another anchor, climb back up to the first piece, get the rope out and rap down, and then lower partner using that lead rope ?

what in 30 minutes ?


billl7


Jun 29, 2010, 12:48 AM
Post #35 of 133 (11044 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1890

Re: [majid_sabet] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
He climbed a tensioned rope meaning his partner was at the end of his line so when he was climbing, his partner was been lowered (pulley action) .
Yes - I agree.

majid_sabet wrote:
This whole thing was taken place on a cam that just took 100 footer .
... perhaps as much as a 140 footer but not the only piece on the line.

majid_sabet wrote:
If he had a second rope then he was able to escape belay and secure the top piece, rap down, assess the situation and fix another anchor then lower partner via second rope
Right ... but no second rope.

majid_sabet wrote:
... he was planning to fix the top piece and rap down via prusic on a rope that had climber hanging on it.
Right - while leapfrogging upward the gear he had with him as he climbed up. When he couldn't move it up further he built a belay-worth anchor (as best he could) before soloing up to reinforce the top piece. Anchor pieces were set for an upward pull which would be iffy if the top piece blew.

majid_sabet wrote:
What I like to know was his plan C after he got down to the injured climber . Set another anchor, climb back up to the first piece, get the rope out and rap down, and then lower partner using that lead rope ?
Probably not much more of a plan given that he knew an external rescue team was mobilizing. Probably main thing is to get his partner so he's not hanging unconcious in his harness, stop any bleeding, and wait.

Not sure there was much more he should have done. Different story if no one was coming. But your criticism pertained to the actual circumstances?

Bill L


kachoong


Jun 29, 2010, 1:04 AM
Post #36 of 133 (11033 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [majid_sabet] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
billl7 wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
flamer wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
This was one of the most dangerous self-rescue project I have ever heard with such a poor planning. climbing a tensioned rope ( with an injured climber at the end)on a piece that just took 100 feet of FF2 with no extra rope or gear was a bad idea especially when your action did not do anything other than jeopardizing your own lives.

You need to reread what Bill wrote.
At no time did he climb the tensioned line.
FF2 with that much rope out and pure dynamic(ie counter-weight) belay? Extremely doubtful.

from his blog

I continued moving up the crack until I was about fifteen feet below the piece holding us. At this point the crack above was too side for any gear, so I constructed a belay here from the #3 and the #3.5 Camalots, equalizing them to the weight from an upward pull towards the #2 Camalot above. Once this was done I put two prussiks on the rope and attached them to the belay. Now when I moved up a bit more the Tom’s weight was held by the prusiks and finally the rope to me went slack.
Majid - I still don't see the FF2 or the ascension of a tensioned rope. Bill

Bill

He climbed a tensioned rope meaning his partner was at the end of his line so when he was climbing, his partner was been lowered (pulley action) . This whole thing was taken place on a cam that just took 100 footer . If he had a second rope then he was able to escape belay and secure the top piece, rap down, assess the situation and fix another anchor then lower partner via second rope instead, he was planning to fix the top piece and rap down via prusic on a rope that had climber hanging on it. What I like to know was his plan C after he got down to the injured climber . Set another anchor, climb back up to the first piece, get the rope out and rap down, and then lower partner using that lead rope ?

what in 30 minutes ?

Majid... you're not making much sense. He wasn't "climbing" a tension rope. Sure, he was climbing, and the rope was in tension, but he wasn't ascending it... from your last wording though I'm guessing that's also what you believe, but your condescending tone is a little out of line.

Secondly, why would they even have a second rope? Where did you pull that from? In the style they chose, they had no need for a second rope. For the third (fourth?) time, they had rap lines in place and decided 30m of rope adequate (and not unreasonable) for their planned outing. Should they have carried extra? I'm sure a lot of climbers under the same circumstances, and with the same goal, would have not.

And what do you mean by "30 minutes"...? Is this a magical number? Please enlighten us.

His decision at the time seems to have involved a serious amount of unselfishness and worry for his partner. The fallen climber was hanging, most likely upside down and it looks like his upward movement allowed for his partner to reach a ledge... righting himself in the process.

With the same accident in a different location, say more remote, I'm very sure these same climbers would have prepared differently. I think he did a great job under the circumstances.

[edit: I guess you beat me to it, Bill...]


(This post was edited by kachoong on Jun 29, 2010, 1:05 AM)


billl7


Jun 29, 2010, 1:33 AM
Post #37 of 133 (11011 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1890

Re: [kachoong] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kachoong wrote:
In the style they chose, they had no need for a second rope. For the third (fourth?) time, they had rap lines in place and decided 30m of rope adequate (and not unreasonable) for their planned outing. Should they have carried extra? I'm sure a lot of climbers under the same circumstances, and with the same goal, would have not.

...

His decision at the time seems to have involved a serious amount of unselfishness and worry for his partner. The fallen climber was hanging, most likely upside down and it looks like his upward movement allowed for his partner to reach a ledge... righting himself in the process.

Well said. Under the conditions they chose to climb and the proximity to help, Bill may have done exactly the right thing in relatively quickly lowering Tom.

Edit: There is the one question by sspssp - whether Bill could reach the rope going to Tom. Securing that would have left a fair amount of rope available, even if not enough to rap to Tom. But with the right techniques he could have more fully lowered Tom.


(This post was edited by billl7 on Jun 29, 2010, 1:55 AM)


Gmburns2000


Jun 29, 2010, 3:02 AM
Post #38 of 133 (10956 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [billl7] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Wow. Really intense story. I hope the climber recovers well. It certainly sounds as if he was lucky.

Good luck to the author, too. That has to be a pretty traumatic event to recover from.

It is amazing if he really is active again in just a few weeks as the author mentioned was a possibility. Here's hoping his prediction comes true.

We don't get very many simul-climbing accidents, so I'm also curious to know what people think of his actions (or, even if they agree with his actions what else could have possibly been done). I would think that most of the analysis, however, would involved escaping the system somehow.

One specific question, though, what is the realistic chance that a leader fall while simul-climbing can cause the second to zipper out the gear ahead of him. I know he had cams between him and the the piece that held (the #2), and that cams are more multi-directional than nuts, but is it possible that such a leader fall could generate enough force such that the second rips the gear out as he rockets upward? Do people tend to only simul-climb with cams as a result of this possibility?


ClimbClimb


Jun 29, 2010, 3:19 AM
Post #39 of 133 (10939 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 5, 2009
Posts: 389

Re: [boymeetsrock] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

boymeetsrock wrote:
But what essentially amounts to slander up thread is uncalled for. Far better climbers than we have been involved in multiple accidents and rescues because they decided to push the envelope.

+1


patto


Jun 29, 2010, 3:21 AM
Post #40 of 133 (10938 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453

Re: [Gmburns2000] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is harness hand syndrome. It is possible that the second's action my climbing up and lowering his partner to a ledge saved the partners life. We don't know and its difficult to speculate.

Gmburns2000 wrote:
We don't get very many simul-climbing accidents, so I'm also curious to know what people think of his actions (or, even if they agree with his actions what else could have possibly been done). I would think that most of the analysis, however, would involved escaping the system somehow.

Given the situation what the climber did was fine. If help wasn't available the the first priority is to get the the injured party and secure him. Next you need to reclimb and retrieve the rope.

Gmburns2000 wrote:
One specific question, though, what is the realistic chance that a leader fall while simul-climbing can cause the second to zipper out the gear ahead of him. I know he had cams between him and the the piece that held (the #2), and that cams are more multi-directional than nuts, but is it possible that such a leader fall could generate enough force such that the second rips the gear out as he rockets upward? Do people tend to only simul-climb with cams as a result of this possibility?

Some gear could get zippered but by that time the top piece is holding the fall and the concern of zippering gear is not really a big one.

Simul climbing happens all the time in alpine and mixed routes. A friend of mine put up a new route on Mt Cook and simul-climbed half of it. I've simul climbed twice. And pitching out Royal Arches I wish I had simul climbed it.


patto


Jun 29, 2010, 3:31 AM
Post #41 of 133 (10935 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453

Re: [Gmburns2000] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I agree. I don't understand alot of the criticism leveled in this thread at the style that these climber chose.

Go climb Snake Dike in Yosemite for example and your risks are far far greater than the risks here. 25m between the bolts has a potential for an even larger fall than experienced here. Almost zero option for improvised anchors. Self rescue of a immobilised climber would be extraordinarily difficult. 4 hours minimum hike to get help. High altitude, possible high winds and sub zero temperatures. Hey and all this on a 5.7 popular climb!

If this simul climbing episode sounds especially risky to you then your scope of climbing adventure must be narrow.


marc801


Jun 29, 2010, 5:25 AM
Post #42 of 133 (10894 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [cracklover] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
Second, that was a proud objective.
Proud? 100 pitches in Eldo of all places with fixed descent lines and stashed water and food. Sounds more like a stunt.

We all feel for the climbers involved and wish a speedy recovery. Too bad it wasn't for some other objective, but that's what they wanted to do. So be it.


onrockandice


Jun 29, 2010, 5:27 AM
Post #43 of 133 (10892 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 16, 2009
Posts: 355

Re: [lena_chita] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
For the same reason(s) you have when you climb. You make your choices on style, protection, boldness, difficulty, etc. But you take risks when you climb.

I love the presence of mind your bring to these chats. I am going to go somewhere quiet and thank whatever God I believe in that, "I am allowed my reasons for doing what I do."

So very thankful. Rock climbing is a gift to every last one of us. It's precious and we don't want to be judged for how we use it and neither does anyone else.

I gave you 5 stars because you made me thankful that I'm a climber and as a climber I have choices that make the sport satisfying, exciting and rewarding.


rtwilli4


Jun 29, 2010, 5:35 AM
Post #44 of 133 (10889 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

Re: [patto] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

patto wrote:
I agree. I don't understand alot of the criticism leveled in this thread at the style that these climber chose.

Go climb Snake Dike in Yosemite for example and your risks are far far greater than the risks here. 25m between the bolts has a potential for an even larger fall than experienced here. Almost zero option for improvised anchors. Self rescue of a immobilised climber would be extraordinarily difficult. 4 hours minimum hike to get help. High altitude, possible high winds and sub zero temperatures. Hey and all this on a 5.7 popular climb!

If this simul climbing episode sounds especially risky to you then your scope of climbing adventure must be narrow.

This is exactly why I wanted some people to weigh in on what could be done if they had been in a wilderness setting.

I will be climbing out west for a few months this fall and will probably be simul-climbing that exact route (Snake Dyke not Eldo)! I have a pretty good idea of what I would have done but I'd need to go back and re-read exactly what gear he had w/ him to write it up properly. Also, I don't think you're making anchors that easily on something like Snake Dyke so let me ask ONE MORE TIME:

- What do you do in a wilderness situation?
- What do you do if there is nowhere for gear
- What do you do if there is rescue coming but you can see that your partner desperately needs your help, immediately?

We should either have a meaningful discussion or stop arguing.


patto


Jun 29, 2010, 6:05 AM
Post #45 of 133 (10884 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453

Re: [rtwilli4] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rtwilli4 wrote:
This is exactly why I wanted some people to weigh in on what could be done if they had been in a wilderness setting.


If you are out in the wilderness then you are going to vastly improve you possiblities by having a spare rope and a spare partner. If you are efficient with plaquette belay devices then a party of three shouldn't be any slower.

Here is a 'rescue' situation on a wilderness climb.
http://www.summitpost.org/...belisk-Accident.html

rtwilli4 wrote:
I will be climbing out west for a few months this fall and will probably be simul-climbing that exact route (Snake Dyke not Eldo)!
I'm not sure that simul-climbing on Snake Dyke in fact with the small amount of gear there it wouldn't be much different from soloing!

When I did snake dyke we had a party of three and two ropes. That said I'm not sure either of my partners would have had the skills to rescue me had I fallen. (i had just met them in camp4)

They were slower than I had hoped on the second and on a hanging belay half way through I said to speed things up one of them had to lead the next pitch. I had the ropes nicely coiled on each leg. I wasn't excited about the rope management if I had to lead again. Both refused to lead due to the exposure. Based on that, the wind, the cold and the threat of rain I ended up calling the bail. I wasn't enjoying the climbing and a was nervous about a wet unprotected class 4 top out.

I still wonder whether I was a pussy for wussing out or if it was a sensible decision. The weather didn't come in and if we had continued it would have been fine though probably we would have been back after dark.

They next day one guy died in this incident because the weather did come in. http://www.rockclimbing.com/...tuck%20rope;#1909967


majid_sabet


Jun 29, 2010, 6:11 AM
Post #46 of 133 (10879 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [patto] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

patto wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
This is exactly why I wanted some people to weigh in on what could be done if they had been in a wilderness setting.


If you are out in the wilderness then you are going to vastly improve you possiblities by having a spare rope and a spare partner. If you are efficient with plaquette belay devices then a party of three shouldn't be any slower.

Here is a 'rescue' situation on a wilderness climb.
http://www.summitpost.org/...belisk-Accident.html

rtwilli4 wrote:
I will be climbing out west for a few months this fall and will probably be simul-climbing that exact route (Snake Dyke not Eldo)!
I'm not sure that simul-climbing on Snake Dyke in fact with the small amount of gear there it wouldn't be much different from soloing!

When I did snake dyke we had a party of three and two ropes. That said I'm not sure either of my partners would have had the skills to rescue me had I fallen. (i had just met them in camp4)

They were slower than I had hoped on the second and on a hanging belay half way through I said to speed things up one of them had to lead the next pitch. I had the ropes nicely coiled on each leg. I wasn't excited about the rope management if I had to lead again. Both refused to lead due to the exposure. Based on that, the wind, the cold and the threat of rain I ended up calling the bail. I wasn't enjoying the climbing and a was nervous about a wet unprotected class 4 top out.

I still wonder whether I was a pussy for wussing out or if it was a sensible decision. The weather didn't come in and if we had continued it would have been fine though probably we would have been back after dark.

They next day one guy died in this incident because the weather did come in. http://www.rockclimbing.com/...tuck%20rope;#1909967

I saw some of the images from the party's camera. You were lucky. That storm looked black and scary from miles away. These guys had time but ignored the signs and paid a heavy price for it.


patto


Jun 29, 2010, 6:38 AM
Post #47 of 133 (10867 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453

Re: [majid_sabet] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
I saw some of the images from the party's camera. You were lucky. That storm looked black and scary from miles away. These guys had time but ignored the signs and paid a heavy price for it.

Yes. That storm was well forcsast as you probably know that is despite what the incident report says.

Just to clear things up there was nothing forecast the day I went up Snake Dike. I pretty sure the storm was forecast for the following night.

I think I went up Snake Dike on the 9th, ill have to check my photos from my camera. From memory it was miserable and wet in the valley during the day on the 10th and the big storm hit on the evening of the 10th.

Additionally I had rain jacket, down jacket, and a polartec jacket as well as thermals. If I had continued that climb it would have been fine. The fog that was enveloping the half dome disapated as we descended and there was no rain.


dingus


Jun 29, 2010, 1:47 PM
Post #48 of 133 (10768 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [kachoong] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

kachoong wrote:
In the style they chose, they had no need for a second rope.

Well as it turned out they DID have a need for a 2nd rope.

DMT


kachoong


Jun 29, 2010, 2:16 PM
Post #49 of 133 (10745 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [majid_sabet] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

onrockandice wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
For the same reason(s) you have when you climb. You make your choices on style, protection, boldness, difficulty, etc. But you take risks when you climb.

I love the presence of mind your bring to these chats. I am going to go somewhere quiet and thank whatever God I believe in that, "I am allowed my reasons for doing what I do."

So very thankful. Rock climbing is a gift to every last one of us. It's precious and we don't want to be judged for how we use it and neither does anyone else.

I gave you 5 stars because you made me thankful that I'm a climber and as a climber I have choices that make the sport satisfying, exciting and rewarding.

^^+1


majid_sabet wrote:
from his blog

I continued moving up the crack until I was about fifteen feet below the piece holding us. At this point the crack above was too side for any gear, so I constructed a belay here from the #3 and the #3.5 Camalots, equalizing them to the weight from an upward pull towards the #2 Camalot above. Once this was done I put two prussiks on the rope and attached them to the belay. Now when I moved up a bit more the Tom’s weight was held by the prusiks and finally the rope to me went slack.


To be more helpful, you should put your diagram here in the thread rather than edit an older post. Some people may miss it if they're already following this thread.

I'm guessing you're trying to show the situation as it was after he had made his anchor, 15ft up from where he started...?


onrockandice


Jun 29, 2010, 3:37 PM
Post #50 of 133 (10686 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 16, 2009
Posts: 355

Re: [rtwilli4] Fall while simul-climbing Eldorado [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rtwilli4 wrote:
We should either have a meaningful discussion or stop arguing.

Wow! I just read the accident posted by Friends of YOSAR.

Very frightening because I and a fellow climber were in nearly the exact same situation at 8,000 feet on Wednesday night of last week.

I'll write up a full report on what we did wrong (we did nothing right) and how we were so damned lucky to get out of it alive and embarrassed.

We should be dead. I knew better, had all the stuff we needed sorted and packed very tightly in a zippered waterproof bag the size of a 1 gallon ziploc bag. I handed it to him because he was younger and therefore the sherpa (he volunteered) he was so eager he forgot to pack it and I was so pressed I forgot to double-check we had it.

What later ensued was 16 hours of being stupid that we get to live and retell thank God.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Accident and Incident Analysis

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook