Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads:
totem cams now available?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Gear Heads

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All


johnwesely


Jul 27, 2010, 8:34 PM
Post #76 of 140 (6776 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [drector] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

drector wrote:
patto wrote:
How many cams do you know can do this?

[image]http://www.totemcams.com/files/galeria/images/UniqueCapabilities/30flaredWeb.JPG[/image]

I know of lots. All of my DB, Trango, OP, etc., cams can be photographed inside of a crack like that.

Dave

Have you seen the video?


vegastradguy


Jul 27, 2010, 8:55 PM
Post #77 of 140 (6763 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919

Re: [kane_schutzman] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
Right,

So who is definitely purchasing oneand writing up a review? Anyone?

oh, im sure a review will rear its ugly head at some point- rc.com has, afterall, been the foremost climbing media outlet that has been covering these little beauties for the last three years....


Rudmin


Jul 28, 2010, 7:50 PM
Post #78 of 140 (6623 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2009
Posts: 606

Re: [patto] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

patto wrote:
How many cams do you know can do this?

[image]http://www.totemcams.com/files/galeria/images/UniqueCapabilities/30flaredWeb.JPG[/image]

The 40 deg flare claim seems pretty suspect to me. Sure their cams can physically operate within a 40 degree flare but that is completely conditional on having a very high coefficient of friction, more than the conservative estimate of 0.25 which dictates a 4:1 caming ratio or traditional 14 degree cam angle.

A normal cam will pop it's lobes in a 28 degree flare, but this is also the conservative limit most commonly used for any friction holding metal on rock device. Totem cams are just going beyond the conservative range. That means that only certain textures of rock can actually hold a 40 degree flare. Those same rocks could also potentially hold traditional cams with 20 degree cam angles, but you don't see anyone making those because they aren't very safe.

Their design lets them get more torque on the lobes, but it doesn't negate the maximum angle that you can apply a force on a rock surface without slipping. If 14 degrees is the slipping angle for friction of metal on rock, you could get a power jack into that flare and it will still pop out at 28 degrees.

If people start buying these things to pop into 40 degree flares, they will be disappointed or hurt.

It's simple physics. If the coefficient of friction is 0.25, then 28 degrees is the maximum angle you can squeeze something into a flare using only friction. Any demonstration of larger flares is just rock that has a larger coefficient of friction.


shimanilami


Jul 28, 2010, 8:14 PM
Post #79 of 140 (6626 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043

Re: [vegastradguy] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

vegastradguy wrote:
... covering these little beauties for the last three years....

I'm beginning to think these things are an internet hoax. If they're so bad-ass, then why is it taking them so long to get them out for review? It's not like they'd need to build a fricken' factory. Just machine a few dozen up and send them to someone for a test drive.

The slow pace is doing nothing for my confidence ... quite the opposite, actually.


vegastradguy


Jul 29, 2010, 1:30 AM
Post #80 of 140 (6589 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919

Re: [shimanilami] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

well, theres actually lots of legit reasons for why they have been so delayed...but, if it comforts you to know, my review set arrived on monday afternoon, so they are in hand at this point. i also know of another review set that will be arriving in the states shortly (probably within the week if it hasnt already).

i probably wont get a chance to play with them for another few weeks (too goddamn hot), but my fellow gear reviewer will probably have 100 pitches on them by then and a verdict.


the_climber


Jul 29, 2010, 1:33 AM
Post #81 of 140 (6586 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 9, 2003
Posts: 6142

Re: [vegastradguy] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

If you're fellow reviewer can't get out then send them up to Alberta and I'll review them.

I'm a staunch trad climber BTW, and can guarantee they will be used on new routes.


(This post was edited by the_climber on Jul 29, 2010, 1:33 AM)


vegastradguy


Jul 29, 2010, 1:40 AM
Post #82 of 140 (6579 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919

Re: [the_climber] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

the_climber wrote:
If you're fellow reviewer can't get out then send them up to Alberta and I'll review them.

I'm a staunch trad climber BTW, and can guarantee they will be used on new routes.

well, my fellow reviewer is doing it for a separate site and i'll crosslink his review on this one, so its unlikely he'll be willing to give them up, but nice try!


crackers


Jul 29, 2010, 3:29 AM
Post #83 of 140 (6553 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2005
Posts: 416

Re: [shimanilami] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shimanilami wrote:
I'm beginning to think these things are an internet hoax. If they're so bad-ass, then why is it taking them so long to get them out for review? It's not like they'd need to build a fricken' factory. Just machine a few dozen up and send them to someone for a test drive.

Actually, to have a review done and published you'd need to a) have your factory set up, b) have the factory pass the iso 9001, c) pass the relevant CE/UIAA safety tests, d) have all of your legal usage documentation vetted and approved, e) HAVE YOUR INSURANCE VALIDATE THE ABOVE, e) then send them out for review.

Editorial reviews are done JUST before things go to market, so that these reviews are published when the things can be bought.

just my $0.02 after several years running a manufacturing company. ;)


adatesman


Jul 29, 2010, 4:08 AM
Post #84 of 140 (6540 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


majid_sabet


Jul 29, 2010, 4:15 AM
Post #85 of 140 (6535 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [adatesman] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, Graham, but IIRC the UIAA/CE thing applies only to goods for sale in the EU. Last I checked there was no certification needed for sale in the US, whether ISO9xxx or CE/UIAA. I seem to recall a certain US-based cam company only reinstating their CE certification quite recently (coinciding with the company being put up for sale), despite being in business for quite a long time and being quite popular.

US does not requires any certification period. certification makes it easier to buy liability insurance in case of SOL.Also certification is not mandatory in EU either.


bandycoot


Jul 29, 2010, 4:50 AM
Post #86 of 140 (6516 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028

Re: [shimanilami] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shimanilami wrote:
vegastradguy wrote:
... covering these little beauties for the last three years....

I'm beginning to think these things are an internet hoax. If they're so bad-ass, then why is it taking them so long to get them out for review? It's not like they'd need to build a fricken' factory. Just machine a few dozen up and send them to someone for a test drive.

The slow pace is doing nothing for my confidence ... quite the opposite, actually.

Ironic you posted this today since I just got them in the mail this morning:

I'm probably the other reviewer that vegastradguy is referring to. I'll be testing them out, but possibly not at the pace that he expects. I've got a busy summer. Still, I plan to put them through the runner and in the end I'll post up my review here and on other websites. The testing begins this weekend at Tahquitz. So, since I have my paws on these things, what do you guys want to know about them?

Josh


brenta


Jul 29, 2010, 6:02 AM
Post #87 of 140 (6494 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 25, 2006
Posts: 50

Re: [Rudmin] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rudmin wrote:
The 40 deg flare claim seems pretty suspect to me. Sure their cams can physically operate within a 40 degree flare but that is completely conditional on having a very high coefficient of friction, more than the conservative estimate of 0.25 which dictates a 4:1 caming ratio or traditional 14 degree cam angle.

A normal cam will pop it's lobes in a 28 degree flare, but this is also the conservative limit most commonly used for any friction holding metal on rock device. Totem cams are just going beyond the conservative range. That means that only certain textures of rock can actually hold a 40 degree flare. Those same rocks could also potentially hold traditional cams with 20 degree cam angles, but you don't see anyone making those because they aren't very safe.

Their design lets them get more torque on the lobes, but it doesn't negate the maximum angle that you can apply a force on a rock surface without slipping. If 14 degrees is the slipping angle for friction of metal on rock, you could get a power jack into that flare and it will still pop out at 28 degrees.

If people start buying these things to pop into 40 degree flares, they will be disappointed or hurt.

It's simple physics. If the coefficient of friction is 0.25, then 28 degrees is the maximum angle you can squeeze something into a flare using only friction. Any demonstration of larger flares is just rock that has a larger coefficient of friction.
Let Fl be the frictional force along one face of the crack and Fn the force normal to the face of the crack. Let mu be the coefficient of static friction between cam lobe and rock.

The constraint that holds for all cams is that the ratio Fl/Fn should not exceed mu.

For regular cams, Fl/Fn equals tan(beta), where beta is the cam angle, but for Totem Cams, Fl/Fn is less than tan(beta). Hence, the same load produces more outward force than a conventional cam with the same angle.

EDITED to add: This greater outward force, however, in a downward flared crack has a downward component, which must be overcome by the upward component of the frictional force. In a conventional cam, this requires tan(beta) < tan(phi), where beta is the cam angle and phi is half the angle between the crack faces.

For a Totem cam, beta should be replaced by the effective cam angle, which is the ratio between frictional force and normal force. This angle is about 13 degrees instead of about 20.

The friction coefficient does not play a role in this derivation.


(This post was edited by brenta on Jul 29, 2010, 2:28 PM)


vegastradguy


Jul 29, 2010, 2:38 PM
Post #88 of 140 (6451 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919

Re: [adatesman] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, Graham, but IIRC the UIAA/CE thing applies only to goods for sale in the EU. Last I checked there was no certification needed for sale in the US, whether ISO9xxx or CE/UIAA. I seem to recall a certain US-based cam company only reinstating their CE certification quite recently (coinciding with the company being put up for sale), despite being in business for quite a long time and being quite popular.

Its true that goods sold in the US do not require CE Cert (but afaik, goods in europe do, or UIAA cert)- but by and large, its one of those certifications that you kinda should have because consumers are looking for it.

also, i dont actually know if by being manufactured in Spain they are required by Spain to have their CE cert before being able to be exported for sale to other countries- probably not, but who knows?


USnavy


Jul 29, 2010, 2:48 PM
Post #89 of 140 (6443 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667

Re: [majid_sabet] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
possum2082 wrote:
just saw the add in rock and ice.

85 for the big un'

http://totemcams.com

or may be I am just blind and a dumbass
I'd bank on it.


johnwesely


Jul 29, 2010, 2:57 PM
Post #90 of 140 (6434 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [bandycoot] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

bandycoot wrote:
I'm probably the other reviewer that vegastradguy is referring to. I'll be testing them out, but possibly not at the pace that he expects. I've got a busy summer. Still, I plan to put them through the runner and in the end I'll post up my review here and on other websites. The testing begins this weekend at Tahquitz. So, since I have my paws on these things, what do you guys want to know about them?

Josh

I really think the biggest question on everyone's mind is, "is there potential in these to revolutionize traditional climbing?" Is the first person on the block who gets a set of these going to be able to put up a slew of FAs, or are the funky placements that Totem cams will hold in too rare to make a big difference?


kachoong


Jul 29, 2010, 2:58 PM
Post #91 of 140 (6431 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [mtnkid85] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mtnkid85 wrote:
acorneau wrote:
There are several of you that want to try them out. Why not pool together, buy a full set to get the free shipping, and then divide out the cams once in the states.

Unimpressed

Alright so a set is 5 units. So we need 5 people to agree to throw down the 85 dollars to split the set (assume 5 for shipping).

So far in this thread we have:
J ung
Mheyman
Suprasoup
adatesman(?)
Patto(?)
I would love to get one, but I really shouldnt be spending the money right now.

Looking on the website shipping for one cam is like 9.50 so we would really only be saving less than 5 bucks if your only getting one cam anyway. It also looks like the free shipping is on any 5 cams so we could order the 5 sizes each person wants rather than the entire set.

You guys still doing this? I could be tempted to be in on it.


bandycoot


Jul 29, 2010, 3:20 PM
Post #92 of 140 (6414 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028

Re: [johnwesely] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
bandycoot wrote:
I'm probably the other reviewer that vegastradguy is referring to. I'll be testing them out, but possibly not at the pace that he expects. I've got a busy summer. Still, I plan to put them through the runner and in the end I'll post up my review here and on other websites. The testing begins this weekend at Tahquitz. So, since I have my paws on these things, what do you guys want to know about them?

Josh

I really think the biggest question on everyone's mind is, "is there potential in these to revolutionize traditional climbing?" Is the first person on the block who gets a set of these going to be able to put up a slew of FAs, or are the funky placements that Totem cams will hold in too rare to make a big difference?

Well, I'll do my best at throwing these things in funky placements, setting good gear below, and jumping off... Maybe I can answer some of those questions, but I don't think there is the revolutionary potential you're imagining. You're talking about marginal placements suddenly becoming bomber and I don't think that's going to consistently happen with these things. I also think someone would get hurt if they made that assumption and pushed the cams limits assuming that these things would hold everything. That said, I can't wait to get these out on the rock to see what they can do!

Josh


johnwesely


Jul 29, 2010, 3:28 PM
Post #93 of 140 (6407 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [bandycoot] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

bandycoot wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
bandycoot wrote:
I'm probably the other reviewer that vegastradguy is referring to. I'll be testing them out, but possibly not at the pace that he expects. I've got a busy summer. Still, I plan to put them through the runner and in the end I'll post up my review here and on other websites. The testing begins this weekend at Tahquitz. So, since I have my paws on these things, what do you guys want to know about them?

Josh

I really think the biggest question on everyone's mind is, "is there potential in these to revolutionize traditional climbing?" Is the first person on the block who gets a set of these going to be able to put up a slew of FAs, or are the funky placements that Totem cams will hold in too rare to make a big difference?

Well, I'll do my best at throwing these things in funky placements, setting good gear below, and jumping off... Maybe I can answer some of those questions, but I don't think there is the revolutionary potential you're imagining. You're talking about marginal placements suddenly becoming bomber and I don't think that's going to consistently happen with these things. I also think someone would get hurt if they made that assumption and pushed the cams limits assuming that these things would hold everything. That said, I can't wait to get these out on the rock to see what they can do!

Josh

That is sort of what I figured. I imagine it will vary significantly by rock type and area also.


JimTitt


Jul 29, 2010, 3:31 PM
Post #94 of 140 (6400 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2008
Posts: 1002

Re: [vegastradguy] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

vegastradguy wrote:
Its true that goods sold in the US do not require CE Cert (but afaik, goods in europe do, or UIAA cert)- but by and large, its one of those certifications that you kinda should have because consumers are looking for it.

also, i dont actually know if by being manufactured in Spain they are required by Spain to have their CE cert before being able to be exported for sale to other countries- probably not, but who knows?

To sell climbing equipment in the EU you must have CE/EN certification. The UIAA Safety Label is optional and anyway depends on the product having CE certification.
One can manufacture anything in Europe without CE certification (obviously as we have to make stuff to the standards required in other countries for export), it is the selling or `introducing to the market´ stage that requires conformity. The `introducing to the market´is to cover not only selling, to stop McDonalds giving away poisonous toys to little kiddies for example.
Be a brave man that put cams on the market without certification though!


kachoong


Jul 29, 2010, 3:34 PM
Post #95 of 140 (6397 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [bandycoot] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I see potential for these things in shallow slots in dihedrals, where only two lobes contact in the slot. Looking at this pic from one of the documents, the cam could be placed in such a way that the outside lobe contacts the side wall, to counter the twist... in this case it would twist counter-clockwise.


Attachments: totemtwolobe.jpg (21.6 KB)


vegastradguy


Jul 29, 2010, 3:54 PM
Post #96 of 140 (6375 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919

Re: [JimTitt] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

JimTitt wrote:
vegastradguy wrote:
Its true that goods sold in the US do not require CE Cert (but afaik, goods in europe do, or UIAA cert)- but by and large, its one of those certifications that you kinda should have because consumers are looking for it.

also, i dont actually know if by being manufactured in Spain they are required by Spain to have their CE cert before being able to be exported for sale to other countries- probably not, but who knows?

To sell climbing equipment in the EU you must have CE/EN certification. The UIAA Safety Label is optional and anyway depends on the product having CE certification.
One can manufacture anything in Europe without CE certification (obviously as we have to make stuff to the standards required in other countries for export), it is the selling or `introducing to the market´ stage that requires conformity. The `introducing to the market´is to cover not only selling, to stop McDonalds giving away poisonous toys to little kiddies for example.
Be a brave man that put cams on the market without certification though!

yeah, to be honest, the way these things work is so unique, i'd kinda want an independent lab to test them before having my customers test them with their lives!

i know the guys who run totem, and to be honest, they really are good guys who are trying to do everything by the book and the CE cert for them was a no-brainer- just something they had to have before bringing them to market.

good to know about the CE cert info in europe- thanks jim.


Rudmin


Jul 29, 2010, 3:55 PM
Post #97 of 140 (6374 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2009
Posts: 606

Re: [brenta] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

brenta wrote:
Rudmin wrote:
The 40 deg flare claim seems pretty suspect to me. Sure their cams can physically operate within a 40 degree flare but that is completely conditional on having a very high coefficient of friction, more than the conservative estimate of 0.25 which dictates a 4:1 caming ratio or traditional 14 degree cam angle.

A normal cam will pop it's lobes in a 28 degree flare, but this is also the conservative limit most commonly used for any friction holding metal on rock device. Totem cams are just going beyond the conservative range. That means that only certain textures of rock can actually hold a 40 degree flare. Those same rocks could also potentially hold traditional cams with 20 degree cam angles, but you don't see anyone making those because they aren't very safe.

Their design lets them get more torque on the lobes, but it doesn't negate the maximum angle that you can apply a force on a rock surface without slipping. If 14 degrees is the slipping angle for friction of metal on rock, you could get a power jack into that flare and it will still pop out at 28 degrees.

If people start buying these things to pop into 40 degree flares, they will be disappointed or hurt.

It's simple physics. If the coefficient of friction is 0.25, then 28 degrees is the maximum angle you can squeeze something into a flare using only friction. Any demonstration of larger flares is just rock that has a larger coefficient of friction.
Let Fl be the frictional force along one face of the crack and Fn the force normal to the face of the crack. Let mu be the coefficient of static friction between cam lobe and rock.

The constraint that holds for all cams is that the ratio Fl/Fn should not exceed mu.

For regular cams, Fl/Fn equals tan(beta), where beta is the cam angle, but for Totem Cams, Fl/Fn is less than tan(beta). Hence, the same load produces more outward force than a conventional cam with the same angle.

EDITED to add: This greater outward force, however, in a downward flared crack has a downward component, which must be overcome by the upward component of the frictional force. In a conventional cam, this requires tan(beta) < tan(phi), where beta is the cam angle and phi is half the angle between the crack faces.

For a Totem cam, beta should be replaced by the effective cam angle, which is the ratio between frictional force and normal force. This angle is about 13 degrees instead of about 20.

The friction coefficient does not play a role in this derivation.

I think you started to see the problem but then ignored it. I am not talking about how the Totem cam works. I know how it works. But it still can't defy physics. It's not about the cam itself. Here I have drawn you an illustration explaining why the cam itself is irrelevant.

EDITED FOR PIC:


I have called it mystery cam. It is capable of producing any outward forces that you want. You can have a 100:1 ratio of downward force to outward force if you like, but so long as this cam is constrained to be in static equilibrium, it requires a coefficient of friction greater than 0.25 (0.34) to remain in a 40 deg flare.

The basic fact is that to support a downward pull, one of the contact forces must include an upward component. For any contact force to have an upward component, it must be at some angle greater than horizontal. If the flare is 40 degrees, a horizontal contact force would produce a contact angle of 20 degrees off of normal. An angle above horizontal will produce an angle greater than 20 degrees. If metal slips on rock at 14 degrees, then 20 degrees is out of the question. The result is that anything at all wedged into a 40 degree flare with a less than 0.34 coefficient of friction will fall out.

When they say that a Totem cam can operate in a 40 deg flare, they don't mention that it is conditional on having grippy conditions. A normal cam will pop out at 28 degrees no matter what the friction and should theoretically be guaranteed to hold on anything less than 28 degrees. A Totem cam will pop out at 40 degrees or whenever it exceeds the coefficient of friction. Somewhere between 28 degrees and 40 degrees it will fall out. Making performance claims on optimistic estimates of rock seems less than genuine to me. People are already lining up to buy these cams specifically for flares because of that 40 degree number.

Comprende?


(This post was edited by Rudmin on Jul 29, 2010, 3:57 PM)


shimanilami


Jul 29, 2010, 4:20 PM
Post #98 of 140 (6355 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043

Re: [crackers] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

crackers wrote:
shimanilami wrote:
I'm beginning to think these things are an internet hoax. If they're so bad-ass, then why is it taking them so long to get them out for review? It's not like they'd need to build a fricken' factory. Just machine a few dozen up and send them to someone for a test drive.

Actually, to have a review done and published you'd need to a) have your factory set up, b) have the factory pass the iso 9001, c) pass the relevant CE/UIAA safety tests, d) have all of your legal usage documentation vetted and approved, e) HAVE YOUR INSURANCE VALIDATE THE ABOVE, e) then send them out for review.

Editorial reviews are done JUST before things go to market, so that these reviews are published when the things can be bought.

just my $0.02 after several years running a manufacturing company. ;)

I'm interested in a functional design evaluation by an independent reviewer, which can be performed prior to establishing all your operational BS. After all, if your design sucks, who cares if you can manufacture it well?

But the point is moot. We'll be hearing reviews of manufactured product in short time.


brenta


Jul 29, 2010, 4:46 PM
Post #99 of 140 (7408 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 25, 2006
Posts: 50

Re: [Rudmin] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rudmin wrote:
I think you started to see the problem but then ignored it.
Yes, intentionally, though I should have acknowledged it explicitly when I edited my post this morning.

You have pointed out a bound that is based on the friction coefficient. I pointed out a bound that is based on the construction of the cam. You say that half the flare angle should not exceed the one at which the two materials start slipping. I say that the tangent of half the flare angle cannot exceed the ratio between frictional and normal forces that a given SLCD produces for an arbitrarily large friction coefficient. Otherwise the reaction at the crack face points down instead of up.

What caused me to be a little too terse is that I'm still somewhat incredulous of my own result. The equation is simple enough: Let Fa be the load: then Fa/2 + Fn*sin(phi) should equal Fl*cos(phi). Since Fa, Fl, and Fn are positive, this implies Fl*cos(phi) > Fn*sin(phi); that is, Fl/Fn > tan(phi). But Fl/Fn for the Totem Cam is allegedly roughly tan(13 degrees). So, how does it work? This even ignores the torsion springs, which tend to spit out the cam from a downward flaring crack.

EDITED to add: The ratio Fl/Fn comes out of the moment equation, and hence is not affected by the flare angle.

EDITED again to add: My mistake above is that for the Totem Cam, the moment equation does not change when the crack is flared, but the Fl/Fn ratio does, because one needs to substitute the vertical balance equation that depends on the flare angle. In particular, for phi=beta, Fl/Fn=tan(beta). End result: disregard the above.


(This post was edited by brenta on Jul 30, 2010, 1:01 AM)


Rudmin


Jul 29, 2010, 4:47 PM
Post #100 of 140 (7409 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2009
Posts: 606

Re: [Rudmin] totem cams now available? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
Rudmin wrote:
The basic fact is that to support a downward pull, one of the contact forces must include an upward component. For any contact force to have an upward component, it must be at some angle greater than horizontal. If the flare is 40 degrees, a horizontal contact force would produce a contact angle of 20 degrees off of normal. An angle above horizontal will produce an angle greater than 20 degrees. If metal slips on rock at 14 degrees, then 20 degrees is out of the question. The result is that anything at all wedged into a 40 degree flare with a less than 0.34 coefficient of friction will fall out.

No. You're considering the "horizontal" to be absolute, when it is actually relative to the rock.

In other words, if you have a cam that contacts the rock at 14 degrees, then it contacts the rock at 14 degrees! It doesn't matter if the rock face is perfectly vertical, or 20 degrees off vertical. It still generates the same frictional force.

GO

"Horizontal" is 90 degrees perpendicular to the direction of pull. Assuming the direction of pull is downwards, horizontal is the universally accepted definition of horizontal.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Gear Heads

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook