Forums: Climbing Information: Regional Discussions:
Jacks Canyon in Climbing mag
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Regional Discussions

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All


climbingbums


Nov 23, 2003, 11:02 PM
Post #51 of 51 (5172 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 18, 2003
Posts: 117

Maybe it is the worst [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If I am not good enough to complete a climb, I either work on it, forget about it temporarily until I get more experience, or simply never do the climb. It is truly disgraceful to climbers not to have this mentality, and instead resort to chipping or comfortizing holds. If you suck too bad to do a climb, leave it alone and allow it to possibly be a beautiful, difficult natural line for better climbers. I have been there and climbed on the chipped holds, and I believe that the magazine may have been right. and the chipping and disgrace of the "outdoor gym" was not the only thing that contributed to the addition to list, I imagine it's because it really is like roped bouldering, somewhat poor rock quality, and the fact that most of the cruxes are less than 10 feet off the deck. Also the bolting of easily naturally protectable cracks may have had an impact. I have to say, I have climbed at a majority of the places listed in the magazine, including Alaska, and I believe that the magazine wasn't far off from the truth.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Regional Discussions

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook