|
majid_sabet
Oct 24, 2011, 5:06 PM
Post #1 of 66
(12302 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
They were equipped with climbing gear and lights, but were not prepared to deal with overnight mountain temperatures dipping into the 20’s. Although they had set at 5:30 a.m. for their climb up the Moby Grape route up Cannon Cliffs, they became overextended on terrain that required more than their level of expertise. http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/...ntain-requiring.html
|
|
|
|
|
gmggg
Oct 24, 2011, 5:55 PM
Post #2 of 66
(12255 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099
|
majid_sabet wrote: They were equipped with climbing gear and lights, but were not prepared to deal with overnight mountain temperatures dipping into the 20’s. Although they had set at 5:30 a.m. for their climb up the Moby Grape route up Cannon Cliffs, they became overextended on terrain that required more than their level of expertise. http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/...ntain-requiring.html Hmm... I didn't know that the rap stations had been removed.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Oct 24, 2011, 6:04 PM
Post #3 of 66
(12244 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
Cannon is nothing to sneeze at. Lord knows, you'll never catch me on it again. This really belongs in A & I, along with most of your other posts. Did you not post it in there just so that you could call the climbers 'ignorant'? Do you know anything about Cannon or the general history / conditions / harsh weather of the area?
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Oct 24, 2011, 7:35 PM
Post #4 of 66
(12165 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
wonderwoman wrote: Cannon is nothing to sneeze at. Lord knows, you'll never catch me on it again. This really belongs in A & I, along with most of your other posts. Did you not post it in there just so that you could call the climbers 'ignorant'? Do you know anything about Cannon or the general history / conditions / harsh weather of the area? if a climber leaves his headlamp and a jacket behind to go for a day worth of climbing in any wilderness setting, I will name them ignorant cause too many of them been rescued for stupid thing
|
|
|
|
|
mr_rogers
Oct 24, 2011, 7:52 PM
Post #5 of 66
(12140 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2006
Posts: 57
|
gmggg wrote: Hmm... I didn't know that the rap stations had been removed. There were rap stations on Moby Grape? I can't think of any after the triangle roof (end of pitch 2 or 3). Which is not to say that there aren't plenty of places to bail from, you'll just be leaving some gear behind. Anyways, Moby Grape is awesome. The best multi-pitch 5.8 I've ever done. God, I love that climb. Ignore what wonderwoman says, the cliff is amazing and there's nothing to be.... OH SHIT!!!! ROCK ROCK ROCK !!!!! *whew* ... that was close.... what was I saying?
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Oct 24, 2011, 8:15 PM
Post #6 of 66
(12119 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
wonderwoman wrote: Cannon is nothing to sneeze at. Lord knows, you'll never catch me on it again. This really belongs in A & I, along with most of your other posts. Did you not post it in there just so that you could call the climbers 'ignorant'? Do you know anything about Cannon or the general history / conditions / harsh weather of the area? Gotta admit, that has to be the first time I've ever seen someone ask why majid didn't put a story in the A&I forum.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Oct 24, 2011, 8:54 PM
Post #7 of 66
(12082 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
majid_sabet wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Cannon is nothing to sneeze at. Lord knows, you'll never catch me on it again. This really belongs in A & I, along with most of your other posts. Did you not post it in there just so that you could call the climbers 'ignorant'? Do you know anything about Cannon or the general history / conditions / harsh weather of the area? if a climber leaves his headlamp and a jacket behind to go for a day worth of climbing in any wilderness setting, I will name them ignorant cause too many of them been rescued for stupid thing How do you know that having a headlamp or jacket would have made any difference in whether or not they would have called 911? And again, are you just posting this here so that you can call climbers 'ignorant'? Another report on NEclimbs says they got their rope stuck and were off route. Go to the left of Moby, and you're in aid climbing territory on wet rock. Seems like you know nothing of the route or situation. Guess this thread is properly titled, after all. And in NH, you have to allegedly pay for your rescues. Let's see how that pans out.
|
|
|
|
|
Dip
Oct 24, 2011, 8:55 PM
Post #8 of 66
(12081 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 16, 2009
Posts: 270
|
mr_rogers wrote: gmggg wrote: Hmm... I didn't know that the rap stations had been removed. There were rap stations on Moby Grape? I can't think of any after the triangle roof (end of pitch 2 or 3). Which is not to say that there aren't plenty of places to bail from, you'll just be leaving some gear behind. Anyways, Moby Grape is awesome. The best multi-pitch 5.8 I've ever done. God, I love that climb. Ignore what wonderwoman says, the cliff is amazing and there's nothing to be.... OH SHIT!!!! ROCK ROCK ROCK !!!!! *whew* ... that was close.... what was I saying? I was just up Moby Grape for the first time two weeks ago. You are correct, the last rap station is above the triangle roof pitch, and that's on two questionable old pins. You are also correct that it's a flipping awesome climb. I had an epic of my own running up it. Got behind some slow people, climbed too slow ourselves, were a little two fixated on getting up, ended up topping out at 11:45 p.m. Walked around the top of that bugger til 2:30 in the morning looking for the descent trail until we gave up and hunkered down behind a rock til daylight, at which time we stood up and were relieved/in disbelief to see the helipad 100 yards away. From what i hear there are headlamps on that ridge every other weekend. Almost surprised search and rescue went after them as quick as they did.
|
|
|
|
|
gmggg
Oct 24, 2011, 9:31 PM
Post #9 of 66
(12034 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099
|
mr_rogers wrote: gmggg wrote: Hmm... I didn't know that the rap stations had been removed. There were rap stations on Moby Grape? I can't think of any after the triangle roof (end of pitch 2 or 3). Which is not to say that there aren't plenty of places to bail from, you'll just be leaving some gear behind. Anyways, Moby Grape is awesome. The best multi-pitch 5.8 I've ever done. God, I love that climb. Ignore what wonderwoman says, the cliff is amazing and there's nothing to be.... OH SHIT!!!! ROCK ROCK ROCK !!!!! *whew* ... that was close.... what was I saying? Yep, you're correct. 3 nice raps from the top of that pitch. 1st some pins and then bolt anchors the rest of the way. And there's usually some tat around pitch 5 as well, which they could have used or backed up with their own gear. They were already through the meat of the route difficulty-wise and where they got rescued from, according to the short post on neclimbs anyway, was pitch 7 just after that big ledge. Rapping would have been pretty trivial compared to calling in the cavalcade of people required to help them.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 24, 2011, 10:24 PM
Post #10 of 66
(11996 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
majid_sabet wrote: They were equipped with climbing gear and lights, but were not prepared to deal with overnight mountain temperatures dipping into the 20’s. Although they had set at 5:30 a.m. for their climb up the Moby Grape route up Cannon Cliffs, they became overextended on terrain that required more than their level of expertise. http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/...ntain-requiring.html Ignorant? Maybe. Inexperienced? Definitely. That still doesn't mean that you should be kicking them when they are down, especially without knowing any details. The actual climbing on Moby is pretty casual, but when you combine it with the weather, loose rock, and route finding difficulties, you can quickly get over your head. Let's just hope they learned some things from this epic. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Oct 24, 2011, 10:57 PM
Post #11 of 66
(11965 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: majid_sabet wrote: They were equipped with climbing gear and lights, but were not prepared to deal with overnight mountain temperatures dipping into the 20’s. Although they had set at 5:30 a.m. for their climb up the Moby Grape route up Cannon Cliffs, they became overextended on terrain that required more than their level of expertise. http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/...ntain-requiring.html Ignorant? Maybe. Inexperienced? Definitely. That still doesn't mean that you should be kicking them when they are down, especially without knowing any details. The actual climbing on Moby is pretty casual, but when you combine it with the weather, loose rock, and route finding difficulties, you can quickly get over your head. Let's just hope they learned some things from this epic. Josh I mean, calling rescue team cause you are cold or you forgot about your plan B is just pure excuse and i do not see why these climbers do not get it in their head that this is not a gym climbing. you go out there to climb, you should be prepped to spend the night out there cause you never know what nature may bring.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Oct 24, 2011, 11:52 PM
Post #12 of 66
(11930 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
gmggg wrote: Rapping would have been pretty trivial compared to calling in the cavalcade of people required to help them. Trivial, except for when your rope is stuck.
|
|
|
|
|
Dip
Oct 25, 2011, 12:33 AM
Post #13 of 66
(11903 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 16, 2009
Posts: 270
|
majid_sabet wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: majid_sabet wrote: They were equipped with climbing gear and lights, but were not prepared to deal with overnight mountain temperatures dipping into the 20’s. Although they had set at 5:30 a.m. for their climb up the Moby Grape route up Cannon Cliffs, they became overextended on terrain that required more than their level of expertise. http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/...ntain-requiring.html Ignorant? Maybe. Inexperienced? Definitely. That still doesn't mean that you should be kicking them when they are down, especially without knowing any details. The actual climbing on Moby is pretty casual, but when you combine it with the weather, loose rock, and route finding difficulties, you can quickly get over your head. Let's just hope they learned some things from this epic. Josh I mean, calling rescue team cause you are cold or you forgot about your plan B is just pure excuse and i do not see why these climbers do not get it in their head that this is not a gym climbing. you go out there to climb, you should be prepped to spend the night out there cause you never know what nature may bring. I don't disagree that we should all be prepared for the worst when undertaking a climb like this. What bothers me is how quick you are to point a finger and say they had no business being up there, i.e. "gym climbers" when you have no idea what happened. And if you are right and they were indeed in over their head then in my opinion they did the right thing by calling for help. I'd rather read about three young people getting a questionable search and rescue than three dead teenagers. I know your counterpoint is going to be that they shouldn't have been up there in the first place if they weren't prepared for the undertaking, and you are 100% correct in saying so. I just think you should get all the facts before you start finger pointing and name calling.
|
|
|
|
|
jacques
Oct 25, 2011, 12:52 AM
Post #14 of 66
(11883 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 14, 2008
Posts: 318
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Ignorant? Maybe. Inexperienced? Definitely. That still doesn't mean that you should be kicking them when they are down, especially without knowing any details. ignorant is the good term in my opinion. If you begin at five in the morning, you can plan one hour and a half per pitches. with that schedule, you are at the top thirteen hour and a half later, at six thirty. they were three pitches lower (380 feet) They were at 4hour 30 from the top. They were really too slow even probably at the first pitch. Planning a route and route finding is some think relatively easy to learn when you climb with an experience climber for one year. The team on moby didn't know how to plan the route and have rope management problem and rap problem. For me, it is too many mistake to be inexperience. They didn't know what to do and just climb without knowledge. I understand that some people talk about route finding and accuse Canon to be dangerous. Climb ambrosia and you will know what is a dangerous cliff. Duet is also special and have some death long time ago (a block felt on the leg and the climber died from an open fracture). Route finding is a skill to learn to avoid the danger and be able to climb on that kind of rock. I onsight more than 10 route in the cliff and still be more stress by some sport climber at cathedral.
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Oct 25, 2011, 1:26 AM
Post #15 of 66
(11859 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
I love reading the newspaper articles written about "Dramatic Rescues" in the climbing world. Let's face it, we have no idea why they needed a rescue based on this article. Not properly equipped for a cold night, I have no idea what that means to be honest. Does it mean they didn't have sleeping bag, or that they were only in shorts and t-shirt with no jackets. Not properly equip from a newspaper reporter is very different than the same words used from a climber. I love climbing on Cannon, but one post above says 4.30 from the car to the top, if it's your first time on the cliff and you're a route at your ability, I think you're looking at a longer day than that. Route finding, if it was so easy, we wouldn't have guidebooks and more people would be putting up first ascents. It's a skill that is learned for sure. Every new place you climb has its own route finding issues. After climbing for years in Yosemite, I moved tot he South East and played on Looking Glass and Whiteside. Following the long cracks of Yosemite made route finding a lot easier than the eyebrows of Looking Looking Glass or the gear protected face climbs of white side. I've climbed on Canon, the talus field, on your first trip will slow you down, the route finding could slow you down too I guess. To call this a "Wilderness Wall" seems a bit of a stretch for me. The parking area is near the base of the talus field, and as the article mentioned, the Search an Rescue guys used a chairlift to access the top. Here is what I see, three guys who attempted a route and for some reason, maybe a stuck rope, were going to have to spend a cold night on the wall. They were scared and called for a rescue. As one post mentioned above, watch for falling rock.
|
|
|
|
|
shortys
Oct 25, 2011, 1:34 AM
Post #16 of 66
(11848 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 10, 2004
Posts: 72
|
majid_sabet wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: majid_sabet wrote: They were equipped with climbing gear and lights, but were not prepared to deal with overnight mountain temperatures dipping into the 20’s. Although they had set at 5:30 a.m. for their climb up the Moby Grape route up Cannon Cliffs, they became overextended on terrain that required more than their level of expertise. http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/...ntain-requiring.html Ignorant? Maybe. Inexperienced? Definitely. That still doesn't mean that you should be kicking them when they are down, especially without knowing any details. The actual climbing on Moby is pretty casual, but when you combine it with the weather, loose rock, and route finding difficulties, you can quickly get over your head. Let's just hope they learned some things from this epic. Josh I mean, calling rescue team cause you are cold or you forgot about your plan B is just pure excuse and i do not see why these climbers do not get it in their head that this is not a gym climbing. you go out there to climb, you should be prepped to spend the night out there cause you never know what nature may bring. majid_sabet really who cares?????????? Why didnt you help them?????
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Oct 25, 2011, 2:28 AM
Post #17 of 66
(11815 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
guangzhou wrote: As one post mentioned above, watch for falling rock. WG was my introduction to multi-pitch & black flies. I saw a climber pull off a rock the size of my kitchen table on a route to the right of me. It made me pause for a second.
|
|
|
|
|
olderic
Oct 25, 2011, 2:35 AM
Post #18 of 66
(11808 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 1539
|
jacques wrote: Duet is also special and have some death long time ago (a block felt on the leg and the climber died from an open fracture). a Small correction in the name of accuracy - though lord know that trying to maintain accuracy here would take an army of typing monkeys. The route that accident happened on was Sam's Swan Song (not Duet) and the victim was a Dartmouth student - Surgeon General Koop's son. This was back in the days before cams or nuts - pitons were the standard and he pried off a loose block while nailing it.
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Oct 25, 2011, 3:51 AM
Post #19 of 66
(11762 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
shortys wrote: majid_sabet wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: majid_sabet wrote: They were equipped with climbing gear and lights, but were not prepared to deal with overnight mountain temperatures dipping into the 20’s. Although they had set at 5:30 a.m. for their climb up the Moby Grape route up Cannon Cliffs, they became overextended on terrain that required more than their level of expertise. http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/...ntain-requiring.html Ignorant? Maybe. Inexperienced? Definitely. That still doesn't mean that you should be kicking them when they are down, especially without knowing any details. The actual climbing on Moby is pretty casual, but when you combine it with the weather, loose rock, and route finding difficulties, you can quickly get over your head. Let's just hope they learned some things from this epic. Josh I mean, calling rescue team cause you are cold or you forgot about your plan B is just pure excuse and i do not see why these climbers do not get it in their head that this is not a gym climbing. you go out there to climb, you should be prepped to spend the night out there cause you never know what nature may bring. majid_sabet really who cares?????????? Why didnt you help them????? me helping two Jr 18 years old climbing n00bs ? Are you kidding me ? I'll them freeze their balls off and when they are ready to take the AED pad to their heart, that's when I go and get them out
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 25, 2011, 4:56 AM
Post #20 of 66
(11729 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
wonderwoman wrote: gmggg wrote: Rapping would have been pretty trivial compared to calling in the cavalcade of people required to help them. Trivial, except for when your rope is stuck. ...and you're off route and disoriented and it's dark... Since they obviously were not willing to spend the night on the wall, I'd rather they acknowledged their situation and called for help, instead of "saving" themselves in to an early grave. Rapping in to unknown territory on Canon after dark is an easy way for an inexperienced climber to get dead.
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Oct 25, 2011, 4:58 AM
Post #21 of 66
(11727 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
majid_sabet wrote: me helping two Jr 18 years old climbing n00bs ? Are you kidding me ? I'll them freeze their balls off and when they are ready to take the AED pad to their heart, that's when I go and get them out i have never met anyone in emergency services ... or any outdoor guides with that attitude ... people run up the chief here all the time with nothing more than some water and a few gummy bears ... even now youre unlikely to bring anything more than some water, snacks, a jacket, matches, headlamp and a survival bag/blanket ... and a cell phone the basic rule of climbing longer rock routes, if mistah mahhjeed actually led more than 5.7 would know, is that you travel as fast and light as reasonably possible
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 25, 2011, 12:25 PM
Post #22 of 66
(11630 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
bearbreeder wrote: the basic rule of climbing longer rock routes, if mistah mahhjeed actually led more than 5.7 would know, is that you travel as fast and light as reasonably possible Fast and light is not something that inexperienced climbers should be doing, or are even capable of doing. These were obviously inexperienced climbers who got in over their heads. No one is debating that. But we don't know the details. 3 Kids who probably thought, 5.8?, we can do that, and headed out on an adventure. One thing leads to another...moving too slow, getting off route, not prepared for the weather, getting a rope stuck, not having the knowledge or experience to save themselves, scared and cold.......they called for help. To Majid and Jacques, would you rather they not called and wound up dead? Now, if the same people were to go out and do it again, that's one thing, but people make mistakes. Let's hope they learned from it. If you spent half the time climbing that you do scouring the internet for ignorance and stupidity, then you actually might be a half way decent climber. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
stagg54
Oct 25, 2011, 1:22 PM
Post #23 of 66
(11602 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 190
|
Fast and light is definitely the way to go but only if you have the experience and judgement to do it. I see so many beginners whose mantra is fast and light and they have no idea what they are doing. By going fast and light you are lowering your safety margin (I realize on some routes speed is safety -ie. dodging falling rocks/ice, ect. but I maintain that in general fast and light lowers your safety margin.). You have to have the judgement/experience to know when to bail and know when you can suffer through it. Beginners don't have that judgement/experience. You also have to be able to know when you gotten lucky. Unfortunately many new climbers mistake luck for skill, and then proceed to step things up and get even more over their head.
|
|
|
|
|
gmggg
Oct 25, 2011, 1:47 PM
Post #24 of 66
(11589 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099
|
wonderwoman wrote: gmggg wrote: Rapping would have been pretty trivial compared to calling in the cavalcade of people required to help them. Trivial, except for when your rope is stuck. Both of them? It's hard to imagine that they had only one rope since there were three of them. Also, what exactly is a "stuck" rope in this particular case. What did they get it stuck in/on? That upper section is brief slabs intertwined with blocky sections. There aren't a whole ton of cracks and there aren't trees. Now of course weird stuff does happen and maybe something did happen but barring injury they should have been able to (or at least willing to attempt to) figure it out or they shouldn't have been there. And, did the rescuers help them retrieve their rope or did they sacrifice it to Cannon? With that said, I'm sure they were pretty spooked during their experience and I have full empathy for what I imagine they were going through. But the reality is that they could/should have been able to handle it themselves. I think any gray area hinges around that "could/should" line. Some people self rescue when they should call for help and some people call for help when they don't really need it. It's situational.
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Oct 25, 2011, 2:10 PM
Post #25 of 66
(11573 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
bearbreeder wrote: majid_sabet wrote: me helping two Jr 18 years old climbing n00bs ? Are you kidding me ? I'll them freeze their balls off and when they are ready to take the AED pad to their heart, that's when I go and get them out i have never met anyone in emergency services ... or any outdoor guides with that attitude ... people run up the chief here all the time with nothing more than some water and a few gummy bears ... even now youre unlikely to bring anything more than some water, snacks, a jacket, matches, headlamp and a survival bag/blanket ... and a cell phone the basic rule of climbing longer rock routes, if mistah mahhjeed actually led more than 5.7 would know, is that you travel as fast and light as reasonably possible you sure do you like your gummy bear story... 2 threads in 2 totally different forums and topics...
|
|
|
|
|
jacques
Oct 25, 2011, 2:36 PM
Post #26 of 66
(4115 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 14, 2008
Posts: 318
|
gmggg wrote: Also, what exactly is a "stuck" rope in this particular case. What did they get it stuck in/on? That upper section is brief slabs intertwined with blocky sections. There aren't a whole ton of cracks and there aren't trees. When you rap, you pull the rope and the rope can be stuck after you let's go the end of the rope. You have to climb back to the anchor. worse think that can happen and in accident in north america, there always a case like that...in a blank wall. In the introduction of canon cliff, ed webster book: "Canon is not the place to learn how to belay or rappel. become proficientat both techniquebefore you come to Canon. I was at two hour from the top and we had 2 hour and 30 of light and more at dust. I was with three partner. One of them took one hour and a half to do the finger of fate. the rest of the team was at the belay half and hour later and, in the traverse to the right, I didn't have enought light and not sure were to go to risk and injury and place my team in danger. I had to bail in the night with three person with low knowledge of safety. I brought them all down even if a rope was stuck in the pitch after repy's crack. I was lucky. There is a lot of difference between someone who know what to do and be push by the even to make mistake and people who climb a long route with 11 hours of light, cold weather and lot of rain the days before. If I had an accident, and i know that it can happen, it had been a mistake because I had too many thing to do at the same time. Can I estimate that a twenty minutes move will had took 1hour 30 minutes... I don't think so. I had test my climber in an harder route before, she was not in a good day. Accident is always something stupid because we analyse it with our two feet on the ground. As we analyse it in the context, experience climber will do mistake because they try to go too fast (lenght of the rope on a rap), inexperience climber will take a good decision and make mistake after because they have too much thing to manage at the same time. Ignorant climber will make many mistake and call the rescue before finding a solution. As the rescue team know a lot about accident, I am always surprise by there comment. Drunk and drivive is somethink stupid and insulting the driver can gave go results. Climbing is not stupid and nobody like to put there life in danger. The role of the rescue is to educate the climber and i think that making a strong distinction between learning trad and learning sport is important .
(This post was edited by jacques on Oct 25, 2011, 2:42 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Oct 25, 2011, 3:16 PM
Post #27 of 66
(4103 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
jakedatc wrote: bearbreeder wrote: majid_sabet wrote: me helping two Jr 18 years old climbing n00bs ? Are you kidding me ? I'll them freeze their balls off and when they are ready to take the AED pad to their heart, that's when I go and get them out i have never met anyone in emergency services ... or any outdoor guides with that attitude ... people run up the chief here all the time with nothing more than some water and a few gummy bears ... even now youre unlikely to bring anything more than some water, snacks, a jacket, matches, headlamp and a survival bag/blanket ... and a cell phone the basic rule of climbing longer rock routes, if mistah mahhjeed actually led more than 5.7 would know, is that you travel as fast and light as reasonably possible you sure do you like your gummy bear story... 2 threads in 2 totally different forums and topics... He sure does like that story. So much that bearbutter has brought up his gummybears story over at backpackinglight.com where he's been trying his hardest his to become the Majid of backpacking SAR.
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Oct 25, 2011, 3:29 PM
Post #28 of 66
(4094 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Fast and light is not something that inexperienced climbers should be doing, or are even capable of doing. These were obviously inexperienced climbers who got in over their heads. No one is debating that. But we don't know the details. 3 Kids who probably thought, 5.8?, we can do that, and headed out on an adventure. One thing leads to another...moving too slow, getting off route, not prepared for the weather, getting a rope stuck, not having the knowledge or experience to save themselves, scared and cold.......they called for help. To Majid and Jacques, would you rather they not called and wound up dead? Now, if the same people were to go out and do it again, that's one thing, but people make mistakes. Let's hope they learned from it. If you spent half the time climbing that you do scouring the internet for ignorance and stupidity, then you actually might be a half way decent climber. Josh IMO it depends ... on the route and the level of commitement and the parties themselves ive seen people run up the apron with full 40L+ packs .. i askes whats inside and its got everything from sleeping bags to a light stove ... and yet they take 5+ hours to do a climb that should take no more than 2-3 max ... then there are the people with the big packs that take 12+ hours to run up the easiest 5.9 route up the chief, they dont know the descent and end up being rescued anyways then theres the reverse this year where some newer climbers tried to run up yak peak with no extra clothing, a single rope, and needed to be rescued by a comorant heli the more you bring, the slower you will be, and if yr whole bunch of new people, it doesnt really matter how much extra stuff you bring IMO ... youll just be slower and heavier ... ultimately its a judgement call, and if the climbers lacked the judgement to make that call, a shorter route or climbing with someone with more experience may have been a better idea bringing the kitchen sink, IMO, would not have helped
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Oct 25, 2011, 3:34 PM
Post #29 of 66
(4089 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
chadnsc wrote: jakedatc wrote: bearbreeder wrote: majid_sabet wrote: me helping two Jr 18 years old climbing n00bs ? Are you kidding me ? I'll them freeze their balls off and when they are ready to take the AED pad to their heart, that's when I go and get them out i have never met anyone in emergency services ... or any outdoor guides with that attitude ... people run up the chief here all the time with nothing more than some water and a few gummy bears ... even now youre unlikely to bring anything more than some water, snacks, a jacket, matches, headlamp and a survival bag/blanket ... and a cell phone the basic rule of climbing longer rock routes, if mistah mahhjeed actually led more than 5.7 would know, is that you travel as fast and light as reasonably possible you sure do you like your gummy bear story... 2 threads in 2 totally different forums and topics... He sure does like that story. So much that bearbutter has brought up his gummybears story over at backpackinglight.com where he's been trying his hardest his to become the Majid of backpacking SAR. yea check the thread I was there ;) .. with a side of JT's nutrition advice.... except that unlike Jay they have no clue what they're talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Oct 25, 2011, 4:08 PM
Post #30 of 66
(4078 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
bearbreeder wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: Fast and light is not something that inexperienced climbers should be doing, or are even capable of doing. These were obviously inexperienced climbers who got in over their heads. No one is debating that. But we don't know the details. 3 Kids who probably thought, 5.8?, we can do that, and headed out on an adventure. One thing leads to another...moving too slow, getting off route, not prepared for the weather, getting a rope stuck, not having the knowledge or experience to save themselves, scared and cold.......they called for help. To Majid and Jacques, would you rather they not called and wound up dead? Now, if the same people were to go out and do it again, that's one thing, but people make mistakes. Let's hope they learned from it. If you spent half the time climbing that you do scouring the internet for ignorance and stupidity, then you actually might be a half way decent climber. Josh IMO it depends ... on the route and the level of commitement and the parties themselves ive seen people run up the apron with full 40L+ packs .. i askes whats inside and its got everything from sleeping bags to a light stove ... and yet they take 5+ hours to do a climb that should take no more than 2-3 max ... then there are the people with the big packs that take 12+ hours to run up the easiest 5.9 route up the chief, they dont know the descent and end up being rescued anyways then theres the reverse this year where some newer climbers tried to run up yak peak with no extra clothing, a single rope, and needed to be rescued by a comorant heli the more you bring, the slower you will be, and if yr whole bunch of new people, it doesnt really matter how much extra stuff you bring IMO ... youll just be slower and heavier ... ultimately its a judgement call, and if the climbers lacked the judgement to make that call, a shorter route or climbing with someone with more experience may have been a better idea bringing the kitchen sink, IMO, would not have helped I cannot say this strongly enough - I think you are dead wrong, and giving bad and dangerous advice. Newbies should underestimate their abilities, and overestimate the amount of gear they need. If that means only doing a shorter/easier route, like Whitney Gilman, when they *probably* could have done MG, then that's the better choice. If that means taking a full extra rope, rather than just a pull line, then that's a better choice. If that means making sure everyone in the party has enough gear to at least survive a night on the wall if doing something long, then that's the better choice. If that means taking a few extra pieces on the rack, when the leaders aren't that experienced, and maybe even having to dial down the difficulty because of the weight of the rack, then that's the better choice. If that means sacrificing some of your climbing time to practice rope handling, gear placing, and rappelling, then that's the better choice. The alternative is running a high risk of getting in over your head and not having the skills to deal. Or, worse, allowing your inexperience to lead you down the wrong path and getting seriously hurt or dead. There is plenty of time to get your systems dialed, thin down the rack, learn enough tricks to make do with less, and start pushing your limits. All of that naturally comes with experience if you give climbing the time and the attention it needs, and you have sufficient natural skill and smarts. As for the broader question, I'm not making any judgment of whether the party in question made the right call to go do this route with the gear and the experience they had. Without knowing them, and given the minimal detail in the articles, I don't think any of us has enough info to pass judment. GO
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Oct 25, 2011, 5:09 PM
Post #31 of 66
(4061 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
guangzhou wrote: I've climbed on Canon, the talus field, on your first trip will slow you down, the route finding could slow you down too I guess. To call this a "Wilderness Wall" seems a bit of a stretch for me. The parking area is near the base of the talus field, and as the article mentioned, the Search an Rescue guys used a chairlift to access the top. I hear you on that one. The talus field us a bitch but it's hard to call it 'wilderness' when you can see (and hear?) the highway and you've got the ski resort a mile away. Committing and scary, yes, but wilderness?
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Oct 26, 2011, 12:41 AM
Post #32 of 66
(4004 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
My point is simply that all the fancy gear n the world is no substute for skills Note i said REASONABLY fast and light in my original post One can bring everything one needs and still be reasonably light.. I can personally fit a synthetic puffy, a down puffy, a rain jacket, a survival bag, headlamp, snacks, water, aid kit, and more in a small bullet pack ... Etc ... If you cant do a rock climb in a non remote location without dragging up a shietload of gear (not just pro an ropes) then my suggestion would be to go on something more suitable ... You dont want to be one of those parties here aiding up every crux an causing traffic jams ... Or being recued because yr too slow and got benighted I always wonder about these people bringing big 40L+ packs up what are basically roadside rock multipitch routes ....
cracklover wrote: bearbreeder wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: Fast and light is not something that inexperienced climbers should be doing, or are even capable of doing. These were obviously inexperienced climbers who got in over their heads. No one is debating that. But we don't know the details. 3 Kids who probably thought, 5.8?, we can do that, and headed out on an adventure. One thing leads to another...moving too slow, getting off route, not prepared for the weather, getting a rope stuck, not having the knowledge or experience to save themselves, scared and cold.......they called for help. To Majid and Jacques, would you rather they not called and wound up dead? Now, if the same people were to go out and do it again, that's one thing, but people make mistakes. Let's hope they learned from it. If you spent half the time climbing that you do scouring the internet for ignorance and stupidity, then you actually might be a half way decent climber. Josh IMO it depends ... on the route and the level of commitement and the parties themselves ive seen people run up the apron with full 40L+ packs .. i askes whats inside and its got everything from sleeping bags to a light stove ... and yet they take 5+ hours to do a climb that should take no more than 2-3 max ... then there are the people with the big packs that take 12+ hours to run up the easiest 5.9 route up the chief, they dont know the descent and end up being rescued anyways then theres the reverse this year where some newer climbers tried to run up yak peak with no extra clothing, a single rope, and needed to be rescued by a comorant heli the more you bring, the slower you will be, and if yr whole bunch of new people, it doesnt really matter how much extra stuff you bring IMO ... youll just be slower and heavier ... ultimately its a judgement call, and if the climbers lacked the judgement to make that call, a shorter route or climbing with someone with more experience may have been a better idea bringing the kitchen sink, IMO, would not have helped I cannot say this strongly enough - I think you are dead wrong, and giving bad and dangerous advice. Newbies should underestimate their abilities, and overestimate the amount of gear they need. If that means only doing a shorter/easier route, like Whitney Gilman, when they *probably* could have done MG, then that's the better choice. If that means taking a full extra rope, rather than just a pull line, then that's a better choice. If that means making sure everyone in the party has enough gear to at least survive a night on the wall if doing something long, then that's the better choice. If that means taking a few extra pieces on the rack, when the leaders aren't that experienced, and maybe even having to dial down the difficulty because of the weight of the rack, then that's the better choice. If that means sacrificing some of your climbing time to practice rope handling, gear placing, and rappelling, then that's the better choice. The alternative is running a high risk of getting in over your head and not having the skills to deal. Or, worse, allowing your inexperience to lead you down the wrong path and getting seriously hurt or dead. There is plenty of time to get your systems dialed, thin down the rack, learn enough tricks to make do with less, and start pushing your limits. All of that naturally comes with experience if you give climbing the time and the attention it needs, and you have sufficient natural skill and smarts. As for the broader question, I'm not making any judgment of whether the party in question made the right call to go do this route with the gear and the experience they had. Without knowing them, and given the minimal detail in the articles, I don't think any of us has enough info to pass judment. GO
|
|
|
|
|
damienclimber
Oct 26, 2011, 12:50 AM
Post #33 of 66
(4002 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2011
Posts: 313
|
notapplicable wrote: wonderwoman wrote: gmggg wrote: Rapping would have been pretty trivial compared to calling in the cavalcade of people required to help them. Trivial, except for when your rope is stuck. ...and you're off route and disoriented and it's dark... Since they obviously were not willing to spend the night on the wall, I'd rather they acknowledged their situation and called for help, instead of "saving" themselves in to an early grave. Rapping in to unknown territory on Canon after dark is an easy way for an inexperienced climber to get dead. There's always moonlight! Its is a natural adaptation. Besides blind climbers climb and rap in perpetual darkness very decently.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 26, 2011, 4:28 AM
Post #34 of 66
(3988 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
damienclimber wrote: notapplicable wrote: wonderwoman wrote: gmggg wrote: Rapping would have been pretty trivial compared to calling in the cavalcade of people required to help them. Trivial, except for when your rope is stuck. ...and you're off route and disoriented and it's dark... Since they obviously were not willing to spend the night on the wall, I'd rather they acknowledged their situation and called for help, instead of "saving" themselves in to an early grave. Rapping in to unknown territory on Canon after dark is an easy way for an inexperienced climber to get dead. There's always moonlight! Its is a natural adaptation. Besides blind climbers climb and rap in perpetual darkness very decently. For an experienced climber, sure. But a nOOb rapping in to an unexpectedly steep and blank section of the wall with no anchor options would be forced to ascend the rope with numb hands or hang there till rescue could be arranged. That is both a very real possibilty and a substantial danger to life and limb. No, I stand by my post.
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Oct 26, 2011, 5:37 AM
Post #35 of 66
(3978 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
bearbreeder wrote: My point is simply that all the fancy gear n the world is no substute for skills Agree, and in many cases, thee extra wait of bringing everything you might need cause you to slow down and need it. What you bring and don't bring is up to you as a climber. If these guys would have been hauling on MB and somehow needed to be rescued, people on this site would have called them Noob and ignorant for bringing so much. Because they choose to lighter, they are being called noobs. Sometime, things do happen we can't control. My partner and I ran decided to do royal arches after having lunch at the deli one day. We ran up the route in about 3 hours, and were back on the ground in under 5. We ate dinner at the deli. A week later, we wanted to see if could do the entire route in under one hour. Just above the Pendulum, a thunderstorm came out of no-where. We spent a cold and miserable afternoon on the ledge. Around Midnight, the rain let up, but because we were planning on climbing in under an hour, we had no headlamp, instead of going up or down, we used sticks and twigs on the ledge to keep warm. (I always have a lighter on the zipper of my chalk-bag. We had a set of nuts, 70 meter 10mm rope, and half a set of cams. two quarts of water, and by luck some sticks. We were cold, wet, and hungry. Same partner and I have done the Valley Floor to Summit of Snake Dike in under 6 hours. On those trips, I see climber carrying everything they camped with up the route. Many of them finish after dark, and hike out by headlamp. Even with sub six hours on Snake Dike, a few years ago, a partner who did Serenity and Sons of Yesterday to Crest Jewel with me two days before slipped on the traverse of Snake Dike. Her ankle felt less pain smearing than walking, so we decided the best way out was over the top. We were moving light, had a very cold night on the summit, called SAR to mule her out after descending the cables and I hike out solo to meet her in the Hospital.
In reply to: One can bring everything one needs and still be reasonably light.. I can personally fit a synthetic puffy, a down puffy, a rain jacket, a survival bag, headlamp, snacks, water, aid kit, and more in a small bullet pack ... Etc ... Doesn't seem so light to me. Especially if everyone in the party has that packing list. First Aid Kit, I always wonder how useful the First Aid kits I see are. In most cases, a roll of Athletic tape and a shirt would be better suited. Do you bring this packing list on every single multi-pitch route you do? If not, which ones? How many time in the last year have you climb a route 5 pitches or longer with everyone in your party carrying this packing list up the route?
In reply to: If you cant do a rock climb in a non remote location without dragging up a shietload of gear (not just pro an ropes) then my suggestion would be to go on something more suitable ... You dont want to be one of those parties here aiding up every crux an causing traffic jams ... Or being recued because yr too slow and got benighted No one goes up hoping to need rescuing. A combination of things, often small things, cause problems along the way.
In reply to: I always wonder about these people bringing big 40L+ packs up what are basically roadside rock multipitch routes .... Me too
In reply to: Fast and light is not something that inexperienced climbers should be doing, or are even capable of doing. You only gain experience by doing it. The more experience the lighter you can go. Again, non of us have any idea how light these guys were.
In reply to: These were obviously inexperienced climbers who got in over their heads. No one is debating that. But we don't know the details. 3 Kids who probably thought, 5.8?, we can do that, and headed out on an adventure. I don't know these guys experience level and don' want to assume anything. As for "5.8 we can do that" is that different from "5.10 I can do that," or "5.11 I can do that," and then find out you can't and need rescuing?
In reply to: One thing leads to another...moving too slow, getting off route, not prepared for the weather, getting a rope stuck, not having the knowledge or experience to save themselves, scared and cold.......they called for help. Maybe it was premature to call for help, I really don't know. Here is what I know, no-one died or lost limbs so all ended well.
In reply to: To Majid and Jacques, would you rather they not called and wound up dead? Now, if the same people were to go out and do it again, that's one thing, but people make mistakes. Let's hope they learned from it. Agree 100% with you on that.
In reply to: If you spent half the time climbing that you do scouring the internet for ignorance and stupidity, then you actually might be a half way decent climber. Josh Nice.
In reply to: IMO it depends ... on the route and the level of commitement and the parties themselves ive seen people run up the apron with full 40L+ packs .. i askes whats inside and its got everything from sleeping bags to a light stove ... and yet they take 5+ hours to do a climb that should take no more than 2-3 max ... then there are the people with the big packs that take 12+ hours to run up the easiest 5.9 route up the chief, they dont know the descent and end up being rescued anyways then theres the reverse this year where some newer climbers tried to run up yak peak with no extra clothing, a single rope, and needed to be rescued by a comorant heli the more you bring, the slower you will be, and if yr whole bunch of new people, it doesnt really matter how much extra stuff you bring IMO ... youll just be slower and heavier ... ultimately its a judgement call, and if the climbers lacked the judgement to make that call, a shorter route or climbing with someone with more experience may have been a better idea bringing the kitchen sink, IMO, would not have helped I completely agree with you.
In reply to: I cannot say this strongly enough - I think you are dead wrong, and giving bad and dangerous advice. That how I feel about the advice you're giving.
In reply to: Newbies should underestimate their abilities, and overestimate the amount of gear they need. Climbers, regardless of their ability should do what ever they can to accurately estimate their ability and what gear they need.
In reply to: If that means only doing a shorter/easier route, like Whitney Gilman, when they *probably* could have done MG, then that's the better choice. While Moby Grape is rated harder, I think it has easier route finding, better protection, and easier on many other fronts.
In reply to: If that means taking a full extra rope, rather than just a pull line, then that's a better choice. If that means making sure everyone in the party has enough gear to at least survive a night on the wall if doing something long, then that's the better choice. If that means taking a few extra pieces on the rack, when the leaders aren't that experienced, and maybe even having to dial down the difficulty because of the weight of the rack, then that's the better choice. If that means sacrificing some of your climbing time to practice rope handling, gear placing, and rappelling, then that's the better choice. Extra ropes mean extra rope management skills, extra gear means slower climbing. The more "just in case something happens" gear you bring up, the more likely you are to use it.
In reply to: The alternative is running a high risk of getting in over your head and not having the skills to deal. Or, worse, allowing your inexperience to lead you down the wrong path and getting seriously hurt or dead. Not sure how having more gear improves your skill level. Sometime, more is just that, more. More for the sake of more is called excess.
In reply to: There is plenty of time to get your systems dialed, thin down the rack, learn enough tricks to make do with less, and start pushing your limits. All of that naturally comes with experience if you give climbing the time and the attention it needs, and you have sufficient natural skill and smarts. Maybe these guys had practice on several routes already. For all you know they were doing two or three ground to summit 5.8 routes a day at Cathedral Ledges and decided to do something on Canon. Again, this articles provides nothing about their back-ground.
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Oct 26, 2011, 6:22 AM
Post #36 of 66
(3969 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
guangzhou wrote: In reply to: One can bring everything one needs and still be reasonably light.. I can personally fit a synthetic puffy, a down puffy, a rain jacket, a survival bag, headlamp, snacks, water, aid kit, and more in a small bullet pack ... Etc ... Doesn't seem so light to me. Especially if everyone in the party has that packing list. First Aid Kit, I always wonder how useful the First Aid kits I see are. In most cases, a roll of Athletic tape and a shirt would be better suited. Do you bring this packing list on every single multi-pitch route you do? If not, which ones? How many time in the last year have you climb a route 5 pitches or longer with everyone in your party carrying this packing list up the route? thats more of an example of what i can fit in there ... unless if it falls below freezing im not putting it all in there ... do note that the jackets are all UL, ie all my jackets combined (rain and 2 puffies) weight less than my old arcteryx rain jacket the last run i did up the chief 2 weeks ago ... i brought a light synth puffy jacket (13 oz) a headsheets survival blanket (3 oz) headlamp (3 oz) 1L of water for myself (partner had 1L as well) first aid kit (home made, basically climbing tape, gauzes, alcoholic hand cleaner that doubles as firestarter and TP that can be used as same) matches whistle gummy bears cell phone and likely a few other things i cant remember partner had a fleece as well and i have a softshell on ... temps were in the 40s to 50s in the day ... and i considered it adequate in case of a bivy ... and thats between both partners, no packs depending on the situation id take the rain jacket (6oz), down puffy (5oz) or blizzard survival bag (14 oz, it is a tested 40F COMFORT,not survival rating, bag) or mix and match depending on the conditions heres a pic of the "oh shiet" scenario gear ... 2 puffies, rain jacket, a 40F comfort rated bag, headlamp, water, etc ... it all fits into a 14L bullet pack and weights a total of 6 lbs including water, but not including gummy bears for all the above i listed previously, i consider it highly survivable down to the 20s, which is as low as reasonable for overnight temps while climbing rock outside IMO ... i frequently run up with WAY less depending on the route and conditions ... in the summer all you need is some water, a headlamp and light first aid in pocket, cell phone, survival blanket and matches in the other pocket ... and gummy bears of course heres me and a partner (who has never done trad multi so we were slow) about a month ago going up 12 easy linked pitches up the chief in 5-6 hours and that was with a minor epic on route ... we may have had a light bullet pack between the 2 of us ... people run up it easily in 3-4 hours if they are fast ... i did bring extras in cams though as my partner was not well versed in cleaning tricams ... of course some groups spend 10+hours on the route, they also seem to be hauling bigger packs heres another one from this month where we descended in the dark .... no pack, run up the chief ... partner staring off in the sunset on the 1st peak as said previously it all depends on the route, conditions, level of the climber ... but generally the more you bring, the slower you are, and the more likely you are to get caught for most routes under 6 pitches, i dont bother bringing a pack unless its the shoulder seasons or more remote ... i usually run up a 6+ pitch route 2-3 times a week when the weather is good i ran up 2 of them the weekend before and another one last week, no pack generally ... keep in mind that many squamish routes are generally right by the road with trees you can rap down from ... ie low commitement factor ... hope that answers yr question
(This post was edited by bearbreeder on Oct 26, 2011, 8:15 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Oct 26, 2011, 2:28 PM
Post #38 of 66
(3897 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
notapplicable wrote: bearbreeder wrote: Face blurred to protect the identity of PAS user. also seems like one of those guys who likes walking around with their ATC hitting them in the junk all day.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 26, 2011, 2:51 PM
Post #39 of 66
(3888 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
guangzhou wrote: As for "5.8 we can do that" is that different from "5.10 I can do that," or "5.11 I can do that," and then find out you can't and need rescuing? I'm not going to respond to everything you said, because I either agree or it's not important enough to me to offer a rebuttal, but I do want to respond to this. I do think it's different and here's why. Grades aside and realizing they are subjective and everyone has their own idea about what a moderate is, I think they do tell part of the story. I think we can all agree that, in general, 5.8 is pretty attainable for almost everyone in a short amount of time. Because of being that attainable, climbers who don't have the experience may assume that if they can do one 5.8, they can do another. Climbers that have progressed a little more have more experience to draw from (Which includes how to get themselves out of less than ideal situations). IME, people that I know that are climbing 10s and 11s on gear understand their limits much better. Josh Josh
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Oct 26, 2011, 5:45 PM
Post #40 of 66
(3871 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
guangzhou wrote: In reply to: Newbies should underestimate their abilities, and overestimate the amount of gear they need. Climbers, regardless of their ability should do what ever they can to accurately estimate their ability and what gear they need. You're completely missing my point. New leaders do not have a fine-tuned understanding of their abilities. They don't know how good their gear really is, so they are smart to place extra. They don't know how snail-eye exposure may make them freeze up at a crux they'd cruise near the ground, making some pitches take longer, or requiring them to place an extra piece to soothe their head. They don't know how well they'll do, or how long it will take them, if they run into all kids of situations that they've only read about, or maybe handled once in a low-stress environment. And they're more likely to get in those situations in the first place. When following, they may take ten times longer to figure out how to A0 or jug a rope to get past a move they can't do than you or I would. Route finding may be much more challenging for them. They may severely underestimate how long their belay changeovers will take. They may miss subtle gear placements you or I would notice, and have to place more gear to make up for it, or bring more gear to make up for not being able to adequately use whatever's left at the top of the pitch. They may be more likely to get a rap rope stuck, and be happy to have a real lead rope rather than a pull line to work with.. Etc etc. And half of this is stuff they don't even know they don't know. It's all stuff that just comes with experience. When you know your capabilities, you know what can get thrown at you, how to avoid some of it, and deal with the rest fairly efficiently, you can play it closer to the line, and 1 - have a better chance of pulling it off, and 2 - deal safely with the consequences if everything doesn't go according to plan. That means you can get away with bringing less gear, and setting harder and more committing objectives, relative to your physical climbing ability.
In reply to: In reply to: If that means only doing a shorter/easier route, like Whitney Gilman, when they *probably* could have done MG, then that's the better choice. While Moby Grape is rated harder, I think it has easier route finding, better protection, and easier on many other fronts. Yer high. There are two or three pitches on MG I can think of that are either indistinct, confusing, or take almost zero gear on a full rope length of crap rock. There's not one such on WG. WG is also fewer pitches, and the pitches go by faster. Mountain Project rightly calls WG grade II and MG grade III.
In reply to: In reply to: If that means taking a full extra rope, rather than just a pull line, then that's a better choice. If that means making sure everyone in the party has enough gear to at least survive a night on the wall if doing something long, then that's the better choice. If that means taking a few extra pieces on the rack, when the leaders aren't that experienced, and maybe even having to dial down the difficulty because of the weight of the rack, then that's the better choice. If that means sacrificing some of your climbing time to practice rope handling, gear placing, and rappelling, then that's the better choice. Extra ropes mean extra rope management skills, extra gear means slower climbing. The more "just in case something happens" gear you bring up, the more likely you are to use it. How does having a 9 mil lead-rated cord in your bag rather than an 8 mil pull line mean extra rope handling? If anything, the real rope is less likely to get snarled. And yes, bringing a few extra pieces on the rack does mean you'll use them. But if you seriously think that a new leader should pare down to a mini-rack on a big route because "light is right", you're as nuts as Bearbreeder. I'm not saying the new leader should go overboard. I'm simply saying that with more experience comes the knowledge required to make the right judgment calls about what to pare down off the "standard rack", and when.
In reply to: In reply to: The alternative is running a high risk of getting in over your head and not having the skills to deal. Or, worse, allowing your inexperience to lead you down the wrong path and getting seriously hurt or dead. Not sure how having more gear improves your skill level. Sometime, more is just that, more. More for the sake of more is called excess. I never said more for the sake of more. I gave a few specific examples. You chose to ignore most of them. These are cases where additional gear can provide a little more of a safety net, leading to better outcomes for folks with less experience and skill. But taking a few extra pieces was not my main point. You can take all the gear in the world, and if you pick too hard an objective, you're going to get screwed. My point is that new leaders should dial back their objectives, and dial up their safety net, relative to what they think they can maybe do. Then as they feel comfortable, they can push it further, and see where that takes them.
In reply to: In reply to: There is plenty of time to get your systems dialed, thin down the rack, learn enough tricks to make do with less, and start pushing your limits. All of that naturally comes with experience if you give climbing the time and the attention it needs, and you have sufficient natural skill and smarts. Maybe these guys had practice on several routes already. For all you know they were doing two or three ground to summit 5.8 routes a day at Cathedral Ledges and decided to do something on Canon. Again, this articles provides nothing about their back-ground. Now you're just being a jerk. You snipped out the part of my post where I said:
In reply to: As for the broader question, I'm not making any judgment of whether the party in question made the right call to go do this route with the gear and the experience they had. Without knowing them, and given the minimal detail in the articles, I don't think any of us has enough info to pass judment. and acting as if I were passing judgment. Nice... GO
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Oct 26, 2011, 5:54 PM
Post #41 of 66
(3867 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
bearbreeder wrote: My point is simply that all the fancy gear n the world is no substute for skills Note i said REASONABLY fast and light in my original post One can bring everything one needs and still be reasonably light.. I can personally fit a synthetic puffy, a down puffy, a rain jacket, a survival bag, headlamp, snacks, water, aid kit, and more in a small bullet pack ... Etc ... If you cant do a rock climb in a non remote location without dragging up a shietload of gear (not just pro an ropes) then my suggestion would be to go on something more suitable ... You dont want to be one of those parties here aiding up every crux an causing traffic jams ... Or being recued because yr too slow and got benighted I always wonder about these people bringing big 40L+ packs up what are basically roadside rock multipitch routes .... cracklover wrote: bearbreeder wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: Fast and light is not something that inexperienced climbers should be doing, or are even capable of doing. These were obviously inexperienced climbers who got in over their heads. No one is debating that. But we don't know the details. 3 Kids who probably thought, 5.8?, we can do that, and headed out on an adventure. One thing leads to another...moving too slow, getting off route, not prepared for the weather, getting a rope stuck, not having the knowledge or experience to save themselves, scared and cold.......they called for help. To Majid and Jacques, would you rather they not called and wound up dead? Now, if the same people were to go out and do it again, that's one thing, but people make mistakes. Let's hope they learned from it. If you spent half the time climbing that you do scouring the internet for ignorance and stupidity, then you actually might be a half way decent climber. Josh IMO it depends ... on the route and the level of commitement and the parties themselves ive seen people run up the apron with full 40L+ packs .. i askes whats inside and its got everything from sleeping bags to a light stove ... and yet they take 5+ hours to do a climb that should take no more than 2-3 max ... then there are the people with the big packs that take 12+ hours to run up the easiest 5.9 route up the chief, they dont know the descent and end up being rescued anyways then theres the reverse this year where some newer climbers tried to run up yak peak with no extra clothing, a single rope, and needed to be rescued by a comorant heli the more you bring, the slower you will be, and if yr whole bunch of new people, it doesnt really matter how much extra stuff you bring IMO ... youll just be slower and heavier ... ultimately its a judgement call, and if the climbers lacked the judgement to make that call, a shorter route or climbing with someone with more experience may have been a better idea bringing the kitchen sink, IMO, would not have helped I cannot say this strongly enough - I think you are dead wrong, and giving bad and dangerous advice. Newbies should underestimate their abilities, and overestimate the amount of gear they need. If that means only doing a shorter/easier route, like Whitney Gilman, when they *probably* could have done MG, then that's the better choice. If that means taking a full extra rope, rather than just a pull line, then that's a better choice. If that means making sure everyone in the party has enough gear to at least survive a night on the wall if doing something long, then that's the better choice. If that means taking a few extra pieces on the rack, when the leaders aren't that experienced, and maybe even having to dial down the difficulty because of the weight of the rack, then that's the better choice. If that means sacrificing some of your climbing time to practice rope handling, gear placing, and rappelling, then that's the better choice. The alternative is running a high risk of getting in over your head and not having the skills to deal. Or, worse, allowing your inexperience to lead you down the wrong path and getting seriously hurt or dead. There is plenty of time to get your systems dialed, thin down the rack, learn enough tricks to make do with less, and start pushing your limits. All of that naturally comes with experience if you give climbing the time and the attention it needs, and you have sufficient natural skill and smarts. As for the broader question, I'm not making any judgment of whether the party in question made the right call to go do this route with the gear and the experience they had. Without knowing them, and given the minimal detail in the articles, I don't think any of us has enough info to pass judment. GO Yeah, a closer reading of your post makes me agree much more with what I think you are trying to say. If all you mean is that it is possible to go overboard, and more is not always better, while acknowledging that newer leaders should bring relatively more gear, and should pick relatively smaller objectives, then I'd agree 100% GO
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Oct 26, 2011, 6:13 PM
Post #42 of 66
(3861 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
bearbreeder wrote: a light synth puffy jacket (13 oz) a headsheets survival blanket (3 oz) headlamp (3 oz) 1L of water for myself (partner had 1L as well) first aid kit (home made, basically climbing tape, gauzes, alcoholic hand cleaner that doubles as firestarter and TP that can be used as same) matches whistle gummy bears cell phone and likely a few other things i cant remember Yeah that doesn't seem that light to me and yet it's still not adequate in many regards. Then again if you're 'trashing' your gear like you say you need to if you're really using it then I suppose that's all you have.
|
|
|
|
|
cogmog
Oct 26, 2011, 6:26 PM
Post #43 of 66
(3852 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 3, 2005
Posts: 19
|
Ok.. simply putting all the reteric asside. The fact remains, they needed to be rescued of a 5.8 which they averaged over two hours per pitch! To me, this defines "not ready" to lead!!! Stay on the top rope walls until you can trust your gear and head on long moderates. ANY climber who is on a multi 5.8 should be able to self rescue and be willing to leave gear if need be. I have gotten caught in lightning storms, hail storms and lack daylight at Senecan, Stone, Looking Glass and Lumpy Ridge to name a few ...on 8's and 9's and had to bail, leaving gear to recover the next day. Its called "climbing" people!! Its not supposed to be safe! Rescues are for EXTREME situations. These three are what closes access to great areas. Where ever I'm at, as soon as I see the bright and shiny unused rack of friends (with no nuts, hex's or tricams) comeout of the brand new backpack, I LEAVE the area!!! LOL! Hate to judge, but these three were not ready and were not willing to suffer a little to learn.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 27, 2011, 12:21 AM
Post #45 of 66
(3786 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
jakedatc wrote: notapplicable wrote: bearbreeder wrote: [IMG]http://i40.tinypic.com/21o0o7n.jpg[/IMG] Face blurred to protect the identity of PAS user. also seems like one of those guys who likes walking around with their ATC hitting them in the junk all day. Come on now, we've been over this a thousand times on here. Gear loops are for gear, tie in points are for softgoods and belay loops are for belay devices. Everything in it's proper place...
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Oct 27, 2011, 1:21 AM
Post #46 of 66
(3772 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
cogmog wrote: Ok.. simply putting all the reteric asside. The fact remains, they needed to be rescued of a 5.8 which they averaged over two hours per pitch! To me, this defines "not ready" to lead!!! Stay on the top rope walls until you can trust your gear and head on long moderates. ANY climber who is on a multi 5.8 should be able to self rescue and be willing to leave gear if need be. I have gotten caught in lightning storms, hail storms and lack daylight at Senecan, Stone, Looking Glass and Lumpy Ridge to name a few ...on 8's and 9's and had to bail, leaving gear to recover the next day. Its called "climbing" people!! Its not supposed to be safe! Rescues are for EXTREME situations. These three are what closes access to great areas. Where ever I'm at, as soon as I see the bright and shiny unused rack of friends (with no nuts, hex's or tricams) comeout of the brand new backpack, I LEAVE the area!!! LOL! Hate to judge, but these three were not ready and were not willing to suffer a little to learn. Cannon is in part of NH that has some of the worst weather in the US. at 4100' it is a pretty high elevation for the area and the night time temps are around freezing and many of the taller mountains have snow on them already looked up Franconia's weather that day.. 50F day time 34 night time at around 3000' of elevation lower. Yes they had an epic fail. but calling for rescue i think was a good idea. they were not prepared to spend the night on Cannon
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Oct 27, 2011, 12:22 PM
Post #47 of 66
(3733 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
cogmog wrote: Ok.. simply putting all the reteric asside. The fact remains, they needed to be rescued of a 5.8 which they averaged over two hours per pitch! To me, this defines "not ready" to lead!!! Stay on the top rope walls until you can trust your gear and head on long moderates. Not sure top-roping will prepare you for leading more.
In reply to: ANY climber who is on a multi 5.8 should be able to self rescue and be willing to leave gear if need be. They should also know when it's time to call for a rescue.
In reply to: I have gotten caught in lightning storms, hail storms and lack daylight at Senecan, Stone, Looking Glass and Lumpy Ridge to name a few ...on 8's and 9's and had to bail, leaving gear to recover the next day. Any climber doing multi-pitch should have enough sense to check the weather report more regularly. Sounds you bad weather follows you around, think I'll avoid climbing the same cliff on the days you're at the crags.
In reply to: Its called "climbing" people!! Its not supposed to be safe! I own a rack and rope to make climbing safer. I do what I can to be safe whenever I climb. I take calculated risk, but I avoid purposely putting myself in dangerous situations.
In reply to: Rescues are for EXTREME situations. These three are what closes access to great areas. Rescues are for situation your can't get yourself out of. I think these three dying of hypothermia because they were to proud or macho to call for a rescue would have threaten access more.
In reply to: Where ever I'm at, as soon as I see the bright and shiny unused rack of friends (with no nuts, hex's or tricams) comeout of the brand new backpack, I LEAVE the area!!! LOL! A few years ago, I received some new cams from a company to field test, they even gave me a new harness and pack, I showed up to the cliff with all the above. My partner and I had a great day with exactly the gear above.
In reply to: Hate to judge, but these three were not ready and were not willing to suffer a little to learn. For someone who hates judging, you sure do a lot of it based on this one post. I don't know what these guys put up with before they called for a rescue. I do know they are not dead and have not lost any fingers.
|
|
|
|
|
sp115
Oct 27, 2011, 12:57 PM
Post #48 of 66
(3730 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515
|
jakedatc wrote: cogmog wrote: Ok.. simply putting all the reteric asside. The fact remains, they needed to be rescued of a 5.8 which they averaged over two hours per pitch! To me, this defines "not ready" to lead!!! Stay on the top rope walls until you can trust your gear and head on long moderates. ANY climber who is on a multi 5.8 should be able to self rescue and be willing to leave gear if need be. I have gotten caught in lightning storms, hail storms and lack daylight at Senecan, Stone, Looking Glass and Lumpy Ridge to name a few ...on 8's and 9's and had to bail, leaving gear to recover the next day. Its called "climbing" people!! Its not supposed to be safe! Rescues are for EXTREME situations. These three are what closes access to great areas. Where ever I'm at, as soon as I see the bright and shiny unused rack of friends (with no nuts, hex's or tricams) comeout of the brand new backpack, I LEAVE the area!!! LOL! Hate to judge, but these three were not ready and were not willing to suffer a little to learn. Cannon is in part of NH that has some of the worst weather in the US. at 4100' it is a pretty high elevation for the area and the night time temps are around freezing and many of the taller mountains have snow on them already looked up Franconia's weather that day.. 50F day time 34 night time at around 3000' of elevation lower. Yes they had an epic fail. but calling for rescue i think was a good idea. they were not prepared to spend the night on Cannon Without knowing more details it really is hard to figure out how badly they screwed up or what they should have done. On one hand the climb is one of the most popular on the cliff and the weather comes in over the back, so you often don't get much warning if a local storm hits. Then again on the other, the climb has been done car to car in less than an hour by more than a few hardmen*... * one of which, I'm definitely not
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Oct 27, 2011, 1:07 PM
Post #49 of 66
(3726 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
sp115 wrote: jakedatc wrote: cogmog wrote: Ok.. simply putting all the reteric asside. The fact remains, they needed to be rescued of a 5.8 which they averaged over two hours per pitch! To me, this defines "not ready" to lead!!! Stay on the top rope walls until you can trust your gear and head on long moderates. ANY climber who is on a multi 5.8 should be able to self rescue and be willing to leave gear if need be. I have gotten caught in lightning storms, hail storms and lack daylight at Senecan, Stone, Looking Glass and Lumpy Ridge to name a few ...on 8's and 9's and had to bail, leaving gear to recover the next day. Its called "climbing" people!! Its not supposed to be safe! Rescues are for EXTREME situations. These three are what closes access to great areas. Where ever I'm at, as soon as I see the bright and shiny unused rack of friends (with no nuts, hex's or tricams) comeout of the brand new backpack, I LEAVE the area!!! LOL! Hate to judge, but these three were not ready and were not willing to suffer a little to learn. Cannon is in part of NH that has some of the worst weather in the US. at 4100' it is a pretty high elevation for the area and the night time temps are around freezing and many of the taller mountains have snow on them already looked up Franconia's weather that day.. 50F day time 34 night time at around 3000' of elevation lower. Yes they had an epic fail. but calling for rescue i think was a good idea. they were not prepared to spend the night on Cannon Without knowing more details it really is hard to figure out how badly they screwed up or what they should have done. On one hand the climb is one of the most popular on the cliff and the weather comes in over the back, so you often don't get much warning if a local storm hits. Then again on the other, the climb has been done car to car in less than an hour by more than a few hardmen*... * one of which, I'm definitely not all i was saying is that they were justified in calling for help once it got dark and they could not ascend or descend themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
cogmog
Oct 27, 2011, 1:36 PM
Post #50 of 66
(3713 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 3, 2005
Posts: 19
|
Guangzhou: Ok,...Toprope walls offers people to place gear and do it safely until they are competant on good gear placement to get on the sharp end. "Weather reports": Weather blows in man and you should be ready. I can fit an emergency blanket, gloves, portaparka and hat in a watterbottle size stuff sack. I do check weather reports....but in many places weather blows in regardless! Ever climb at Lumpy ridge? Snows in July ...out of the blue. Great thing about CO is if you don't like the weather, wait ten minutes! Reagardless of nit picking. The point remains, they were not ready and they were in above their heads. I would have been pissed if I was behind them and most certainly would not have needed a rescue. As far as you "field testing shiny gear" woopedy doo! I'm not a pro, nor do I own a climbing gym but MOST people know what I was getting at here. As far as climbing being "safe" with a rope and rack! Duh...yeah...safer...but its still not "safe". If you think alpine climbing is safe, your going to get hurt or need a rescue. Suffering is part of big wall and alpine cliimbing....if you don't know this, you shouldn't be there! Cheers Mate jakedatc: Totally true mate! But the question remains....why were they not prepared?!! It just simply sounds like a three man party of inexperience. not to knock new climbers....but stay within your abilities. I wish them luck in the future and I hope they learned from it. It will probably make them better climbers and will hopefully send the message of "always cary an emergency kit". An always note where good rap points are in case you have to bail. Gear costs ALOT less than a rescue! As far as them getting off the wall safe. I'm glad they did. I have a feeling one or two of party was "freaking out" and could have hampered the ability to self rescue. If this was the case, that was another error. Don't take inexperience up a wall like that even if you are competant. Cheers!
(This post was edited by cogmog on Oct 27, 2011, 2:10 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Oct 27, 2011, 1:54 PM
Post #51 of 66
(2934 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
cogmog wrote: Guangzhou: LOL! Glad you took well
In reply to: Ok,...Toprope walls offers people to place gear and do it safely until they are competant on good gear placement to get on the sharp end. "Weather reports": Weather blows in man and you should be ready. I can fit an emergency blanket, gloves, portaparka and hat in a watterbottle size stuff sack. I do check weather reports....but in many places weather blows in regardless! Ever climb at Lumpy ridge? Snows in July ...out of the blue. Great thing about CO is if you don't like the weather, wait ten minutes! Reagardless of nit picking. The point remains, they were not ready and they were in above their heads. I don't know what caused them to need rescuing, so I can't comment on what happened.
In reply to: I would have been pissed if I was behind them and most certainly would not have needed a rescue. Me too
In reply to: As far as you "field testing shiny gear" woopedy doo! Most people know what I was getting at here. lol. As far as climbing being "safe" with a rope and rack! Duh...yeah...safer...but its still not "safe". If you think alpine climbing is safe, your going to get hurt or need a rescue. Suffering is part of big wall and alpine cliimbing....if you don't know this, you shouldn't be there! Cheers Mate I spent a month climbing on Lumpy Ridge and some other long Alpine rock in the area. Yeah, weather comes in, I agree, but I do what I can to avoid it.On Lumpy, the weather while I was there was mostly coming in in the afternoon, so I woke early, moved fast, and traveled as light as I could. I do avoid Mountaineering, but I love Alpine rock, I don't suffer much when I do it. I just go out and enjoy myself. On Alpine rock routes, I do pack differently, that's for sure. Big Walls, I haven't done many, less than 30 of them. While I'll agree they are hard work, I don't see it as suffering. Do I get tired and worn out, yes. I sleep well at night too. Often I stink. Do I suffer, not really. If I felt I suffered on Big Walls, I would avoid them, something I don't do. Actually, I'm working on a new Big Wall project this year. My goal, to establish a new big Wall safely. (No Search and Rescue team here in Indonesia.) Actually, I sort of miss knowing I can call Yosar before starting up on many of the multi-pitch I've done here. Especially on Big Walls where my partner and I are the only people around. During my project, it will be hot and humid, I'll be tired, but I definitely won't be suffering. I avoid putting myself in situations where I know I'll suffer.
|
|
|
|
|
sp115
Oct 27, 2011, 2:04 PM
Post #52 of 66
(2932 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515
|
jakedatc wrote: Ok..all i was saying is that they were justified in calling for help once it got dark and they could not ascend or descend themselves. No real argument from me, even if it does turn out that they were complete idiots, I'm glad they're off and safe and no one was hurt in the rescue. Huge props BTW, to the folks that performed the rescue. I'm genuinely impressed by the people that dedicate themselves to this type of work.
|
|
|
|
|
cogmog
Oct 27, 2011, 2:59 PM
Post #53 of 66
(2921 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 3, 2005
Posts: 19
|
guangzhou wrote: cogmog wrote: Guangzhou: LOL! Glad you took well In reply to: Ok,...Toprope walls offers people to place gear and do it safely until they are competant on good gear placement to get on the sharp end. "Weather reports": Weather blows in man and you should be ready. I can fit an emergency blanket, gloves, portaparka and hat in a watterbottle size stuff sack. I do check weather reports....but in many places weather blows in regardless! Ever climb at Lumpy ridge? Snows in July ...out of the blue. Great thing about CO is if you don't like the weather, wait ten minutes! Reagardless of nit picking. The point remains, they were not ready and they were in above their heads. I don't know what caused them to need rescuing, so I can't comment on what happened. In reply to: I would have been pissed if I was behind them and most certainly would not have needed a rescue. Me too In reply to: As far as you "field testing shiny gear" woopedy doo! Most people know what I was getting at here. lol. As far as climbing being "safe" with a rope and rack! Duh...yeah...safer...but its still not "safe". If you think alpine climbing is safe, your going to get hurt or need a rescue. Suffering is part of big wall and alpine cliimbing....if you don't know this, you shouldn't be there! Cheers Mate I spent a month climbing on Lumpy Ridge and some other long Alpine rock in the area. Yeah, weather comes in, I agree, but I do what I can to avoid it.On Lumpy, the weather while I was there was mostly coming in in the afternoon, so I woke early, moved fast, and traveled as light as I could. I do avoid Mountaineering, but I love Alpine rock, I don't suffer much when I do it. I just go out and enjoy myself. On Alpine rock routes, I do pack differently, that's for sure. Big Walls, I haven't done many, less than 30 of them. While I'll agree they are hard work, I don't see it as suffering. Do I get tired and worn out, yes. I sleep well at night too. Often I stink. Do I suffer, not really. If I felt I suffered on Big Walls, I would avoid them, something I don't do. Actually, I'm working on a new Big Wall project this year. My goal, to establish a new big Wall safely. (No Search and Rescue team here in Indonesia.) Actually, I sort of miss knowing I can call Yosar before starting up on many of the multi-pitch I've done here. Especially on Big Walls where my partner and I are the only people around. During my project, it will be hot and humid, I'll be tired, but I definitely won't be suffering. I avoid putting myself in situations where I know I'll suffer. Yep...No mountaineering for me either! I like sun and warm rock. Alpine is fun but I tend to "suffer" because I hate the cold...thus I guess it's not suffering for everyone. I'm nt a pro.. so for big walls there would be some expected suffering for me on a big wall. But it would be the good suffering! Anyway, Good luck with your new route, it does not appear you are somone who would need a rescue. Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
moose_droppings
Oct 27, 2011, 3:06 PM
Post #54 of 66
(2917 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371
|
This is it in a nutshell.
cracklover wrote: My point is that new leaders should dial back their objectives, and dial up their safety net, relative to what they think they can maybe do. GO I'm glad that they didn't get hurt, but we don't know if spending the night out would have been lethal for them. I do believe an unplanned night out on the wall would make their climbing decisions more humble in the future. Either way, unnecessary climbing deaths or unnecessary climbing rescues strain relations with the nonclimbing community.
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Oct 27, 2011, 4:08 PM
Post #55 of 66
(2905 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
i hate to say it but no death is necessary in climbing
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Oct 27, 2011, 4:26 PM
Post #56 of 66
(2901 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
moose_droppings wrote: This is it in a nutshell. cracklover wrote: My point is that new leaders should dial back their objectives, and dial up their safety net, relative to what they think they can maybe do. GO I'm glad that they didn't get hurt, but we don't know if spending the night out would have been lethal for them. I do believe an unplanned night out on the wall would make their climbing decisions more humble in the future. Either way, unnecessary climbing deaths or unnecessary climbing rescues strain relations with the nonclimbing community. I agree. There's just not enough info out there to know. It could be equally true based on what I've read that they made a series of terrible decisions, or that they did everything pretty much perfectly, and just got the shit end of the stick. Either way, I'm glad they're okay, and I do hope they learn the right lessons from their (mis)adventure. GO
|
|
|
|
|
LostinMaine
Oct 27, 2011, 4:29 PM
Post #57 of 66
(2899 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 8, 2007
Posts: 539
|
bearbreeder wrote: i hate to say it but no death is necessary in climbing Someone didn't watch the first 5 minutes of Vertical Limit...
|
|
|
|
|
moose_droppings
Oct 27, 2011, 7:26 PM
Post #58 of 66
(2876 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371
|
bearbreeder wrote: i hate to say it but no death is necessary in climbing You shouldn't hate to say it. Given the circumstances, some are easier to understand IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Oct 28, 2011, 12:32 AM
Post #59 of 66
(2847 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
cogmog wrote: guangzhou wrote: cogmog wrote: Guangzhou: LOL! Glad you took well In reply to: Ok,...Toprope walls offers people to place gear and do it safely until they are competant on good gear placement to get on the sharp end. "Weather reports": Weather blows in man and you should be ready. I can fit an emergency blanket, gloves, portaparka and hat in a watterbottle size stuff sack. I do check weather reports....but in many places weather blows in regardless! Ever climb at Lumpy ridge? Snows in July ...out of the blue. Great thing about CO is if you don't like the weather, wait ten minutes! Reagardless of nit picking. The point remains, they were not ready and they were in above their heads. I don't know what caused them to need rescuing, so I can't comment on what happened. In reply to: I would have been pissed if I was behind them and most certainly would not have needed a rescue. Me too In reply to: As far as you "field testing shiny gear" woopedy doo! Most people know what I was getting at here. lol. As far as climbing being "safe" with a rope and rack! Duh...yeah...safer...but its still not "safe". If you think alpine climbing is safe, your going to get hurt or need a rescue. Suffering is part of big wall and alpine cliimbing....if you don't know this, you shouldn't be there! Cheers Mate I spent a month climbing on Lumpy Ridge and some other long Alpine rock in the area. Yeah, weather comes in, I agree, but I do what I can to avoid it.On Lumpy, the weather while I was there was mostly coming in in the afternoon, so I woke early, moved fast, and traveled as light as I could. I do avoid Mountaineering, but I love Alpine rock, I don't suffer much when I do it. I just go out and enjoy myself. On Alpine rock routes, I do pack differently, that's for sure. Big Walls, I haven't done many, less than 30 of them. While I'll agree they are hard work, I don't see it as suffering. Do I get tired and worn out, yes. I sleep well at night too. Often I stink. Do I suffer, not really. If I felt I suffered on Big Walls, I would avoid them, something I don't do. Actually, I'm working on a new Big Wall project this year. My goal, to establish a new big Wall safely. (No Search and Rescue team here in Indonesia.) Actually, I sort of miss knowing I can call Yosar before starting up on many of the multi-pitch I've done here. Especially on Big Walls where my partner and I are the only people around. During my project, it will be hot and humid, I'll be tired, but I definitely won't be suffering. I avoid putting myself in situations where I know I'll suffer. Yep...No mountaineering for me either! I like sun and warm rock. Alpine is fun but I tend to "suffer" because I hate the cold...thus I guess it's not suffering for everyone. I'm nt a pro.. so for big walls there would be some expected suffering for me on a big wall. But it would be the good suffering! Anyway, Good luck with your new route, it does not appear you are somone who would need a rescue. Cheers I am no pro either. As for someone who doesn't need a rescue, I hope to never need one. I think all climbers hope to never need one. With that said, as a climber, and being human, something, or a series of small somethings, could cause me to need rescuing. One thing is for sure, I need to do more training with my local climbing partners here on self rescue. They plenty of long rock rocks around that are sunny and warm.
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Oct 28, 2011, 1:30 AM
Post #60 of 66
(2843 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
Almost forgot, I don't like the cold much either. I've lived near the equator for about a decade now. Get back to the states every year for a few weeks of climbing. My wife, who is Indonesia, has to put on her fleece every-time the sun dips behind a cloud on those trips. Last summer at lover's leap, the summer before in Colorado, she ha her fleece with her everyday. A pile cap too. While I would love to climb in Patagonia, I will avoid it just because of the cold.
(This post was edited by guangzhou on Oct 28, 2011, 1:32 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
jacques
Oct 28, 2011, 3:18 PM
Post #61 of 66
(2822 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 14, 2008
Posts: 318
|
olderic wrote: jacques wrote: Duet is also special and have some death long time ago (a block felt on the leg and the climber died from an open fracture). a Small correction in the name of accuracy - though lord know that trying to maintain accuracy here would take an army of typing monkeys. The route that accident happened on was Sam's Swan Song (not Duet) and the victim was a Dartmouth student - Surgeon General Koop's son. This was back in the days before cams or nuts - pitons were the standard and he pried off a loose block while nailing it. It is sam sang song. We also had an accident on that route, less severe. A loose block felt on the hand of the leader. He had enought reflex to redirect the rock so we didn't receive it on the belay. With two injure climber, the rap would have been harder. Base took the direction of the operation. It was easier to rap than to walk off. Perfect self rescue.
|
|
|
|
|
olderic
Oct 28, 2011, 3:23 PM
Post #62 of 66
(2817 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 1539
|
jacques wrote: olderic wrote: jacques wrote: Duet is also special and have some death long time ago (a block felt on the leg and the climber died from an open fracture). a Small correction in the name of accuracy - though lord know that trying to maintain accuracy here would take an army of typing monkeys. The route that accident happened on was Sam's Swan Song (not Duet) and the victim was a Dartmouth student - Surgeon General Koop's son. This was back in the days before cams or nuts - pitons were the standard and he pried off a loose block while nailing it. It is sam sang song. We also had an accident on that route, less severe. A loose block felt on the hand of the leader. He had enought reflex to redirect the rock so we didn't receive it on the belay. With two injure climber, the rap would have been harder. Base took the direction of the operation. It was easier to rap than to walk off. Perfect self rescue. Sam's has fallen off most peoples' radar these days. Besides the Koop fatality in the late 60's there was a double fatality in ~1973. Lots of loose rock (duh - it's cannon) but there were several pitches of quite nice climbing.
|
|
|
|
|
sp115
Oct 28, 2011, 5:55 PM
Post #63 of 66
(2791 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515
|
olderic wrote: jacques wrote: olderic wrote: jacques wrote: Duet is also special and have some death long time ago (a block felt on the leg and the climber died from an open fracture). a Small correction in the name of accuracy - though lord know that trying to maintain accuracy here would take an army of typing monkeys. The route that accident happened on was Sam's Swan Song (not Duet) and the victim was a Dartmouth student - Surgeon General Koop's son. This was back in the days before cams or nuts - pitons were the standard and he pried off a loose block while nailing it. It is sam sang song. We also had an accident on that route, less severe. A loose block felt on the hand of the leader. He had enought reflex to redirect the rock so we didn't receive it on the belay. With two injure climber, the rap would have been harder. Base took the direction of the operation. It was easier to rap than to walk off. Perfect self rescue. Sam's has fallen off most peoples' radar these days. Besides the Koop fatality in the late 60's there was a double fatality in ~1973. Lots of loose rock (duh - it's cannon) but there were several pitches of quite nice climbing. Always wanted to do Sam's. Is it significantly looser than other, more popular route (Lakeview, Consolation Prize)?
|
|
|
|
|
olderic
Oct 28, 2011, 6:12 PM
Post #64 of 66
(2783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 1539
|
sp115 wrote: Always wanted to do Sam's. Is it significantly looser than other, more popular route (Lakeview, Consolation Prize)? I haven't done it in a long long time *(30+ years) so I'm not really sure. It does seem to have developed a reputation but then again most of the moderate routes on Cannon have had incidents in the past 10 years. Try asking on neclimbs and you will probably get someone with recent experience. Duet - near by - continues to be popular although I think most people just go to the top of the lower buttress and don't do the upper part of the climb.
|
|
|
|
|
jacques
Oct 29, 2011, 12:56 AM
Post #65 of 66
(2750 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 14, 2008
Posts: 318
|
sp115 wrote: Always wanted to do Sam's. Is it significantly looser than other, more popular route (Lakeview, Consolation Prize)? I climbed the four first pitch twice and bail...one because a thunderstorm and the other an accident. I definitely want to go to the top. Call me next spring or a warm day in week end this fall. It is doable. as for british were coming, a 5.7 for 5.10 leader. Consolation prize is kind of sand stuff in the fifth pitch and loose block at the top. the rope can dislodge them if you don't care. Falling aspiration is mostly rotten rock in the second pitch, with hard route finding. Tripple S is more piece of rock that broke when you load it. three point of contact as you climb is mandatory in the route. You have to look, listen and load slowly.
(This post was edited by jacques on Oct 29, 2011, 1:03 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
sp115
Oct 29, 2011, 12:42 PM
Post #66 of 66
(2713 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515
|
jacques wrote: sp115 wrote: Always wanted to do Sam's. Is it significantly looser than other, more popular route (Lakeview, Consolation Prize)? I climbed the four first pitch twice and bail...one because a thunderstorm and the other an accident. I definitely want to go to the top. Call me next spring or a warm day in week end this fall... Thanks, it's back on the list and I'll keep that offer in mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|