Forums: Climbing Information: General:
This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed)
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next page Last page  View All


moose_droppings


Sep 4, 2015, 9:05 PM
Post #51 of 238 (14116 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [stevecurtis] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Snot is the grease that lubes the channels of communications.


Works well IMO.
Wink


marc801


Sep 5, 2015, 7:33 AM
Post #52 of 238 (14102 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [moose_droppings] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
Snot is the grease that lubes the channels of communications.]
I thought it was snark?


moose_droppings


Sep 5, 2015, 3:38 PM
Post #53 of 238 (14078 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [marc801] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Snark works great, when well lubed with snot.

[


Partner wideguy


Sep 23, 2015, 12:39 PM
Post #54 of 238 (13868 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 9, 2003
Posts: 15040

Re: [moose_droppings] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

I just wanted to be included. I have nothing to add.


billcoe_


Sep 29, 2015, 8:09 PM
Post #55 of 238 (13738 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4692

Re: [stevecurtis] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

stevecurtis wrote:
Pretty snotty title.

Agreed, I copy/pasted the the title exactly as the other earlier one that was whacked/killed by an unnamed moderator. For no apparent reason. Go to this link: http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC So then you agree that the first amendment sucks and nobody really needs nor should have free speech? Good for you. Got any climbing pictures? If not, STFU and stop being a douchbag.
______________________________________________

This is for the solid dude Dave Stephans. Dave, we are picking the plums from your backyard haha. This 1200' now 1/2 way climbed face is getting done for the first time. Not as many bolts as Hells canyon, but a shitload for sure anyway. My piss poor shoulders and attitude notwithstanding, hope to get it finished next year, gonna close out this year as the rain/cold is about here and the deer and elk hunters certainly are - good times. Route is now right at the top of the photo and to the left of the roofs at that fur patch. Last trip up, a squirrel suitor about to jump chose to pitch a rock over to clear the launch spot. Oh, he yelled "rock", and oh, it whacked me in the chest for sure:-0 Had my helmet too high up, it was on my head.




____________________________________________________


wideguy wrote:
I just wanted to be included. I have nothing to add.

Haha. Nice pitch! Welcome aboard, you got more than most of us and in fact, most assuredly more substance and interesting way to say it than that whining douchbag up there complaining about the title^^^^LOL. Any climbing shots?


climbingtrash


Oct 3, 2015, 8:32 AM
Post #56 of 238 (13635 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
ptftw's are not dead

iz troo


sungam


Oct 6, 2015, 8:49 PM
Post #57 of 238 (13469 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26797

Re: [climbingtrash] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
ptftw's are not dead

iz troo
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Now that we live on the same landmass are we going to climb a rock?


6pacfershur


Oct 8, 2015, 8:57 PM
Post #58 of 238 (13377 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 22, 2010
Posts: 254

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

WOW! this thread sure has resurrected some old-timers.....
er, what was the question?


climbingtrash


Oct 9, 2015, 5:53 AM
Post #59 of 238 (13362 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
ptftw's are not dead

iz troo
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Now that we live on the same landmass are we going to climb a rock?

Sure, I'll 2 to 1 yore arse up a root. Where on teh landmass are ewe?


sungam


Oct 9, 2015, 1:54 PM
Post #60 of 238 (13341 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26797

Re: [climbingtrash] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
ptftw's are not dead

iz troo
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Now that we live on the same landmass are we going to climb a rock?

Sure, I'll 2 to 1 yore arse up a root. Where on teh landmass are ewe?
C A L I B O I S


climbingtrash


Oct 9, 2015, 2:02 PM
Post #61 of 238 (13338 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Post deleted by climbingtrash [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  

 


Partner philbox
Moderator

Oct 9, 2015, 2:06 PM
Post #62 of 238 (13337 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13105

This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

This thread even brought me out of retirement to add a drive by post shooting.


sungam


Oct 11, 2015, 1:32 PM
Post #63 of 238 (13232 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26797

Re: [philbox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

philbox wrote:
This thread even brought me out of retirement to add a drive by post shooting.
Wow, I almost forgot your fabulous profile piccy existed m8

Wonderous. Majestic. Arousing. 11/10.


wonderwoman


Oct 13, 2015, 10:14 AM
Post #64 of 238 (13145 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [philbox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

philbox wrote:
This thread even brought me out of retirement to add a drive by post shooting.

But aren't you the king moderator?


Partner taualum23


Oct 16, 2015, 10:40 AM
Post #65 of 238 (12977 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 2370

Re: [philbox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

philbox wrote:
This thread even brought me out of retirement to add a drive by post shooting.

Funny, I was about to say nearly the same thing. I came by to see if anyone wanted to climb with me on Saturday, but dayum...this place is dead, huh? Somebody should start a thread about that.


epicsaga


Oct 22, 2015, 11:25 AM
Post #66 of 238 (12766 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2003
Posts: 226

Re: [taualum23] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

RC.com has been as much a scandal rant troll site as supertopo for a decade. Mountainproject won.


sungam


Oct 22, 2015, 12:59 PM
Post #67 of 238 (12758 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26797

Re: [epicsaga] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

epicsaga wrote:
RC.com has been as much a scandal rant troll site as supertopo for a decade. Mountainproject won.
Actually I am p. sure reddit won((


Samaran


Oct 28, 2015, 11:34 PM
Post #68 of 238 (12530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 26, 2015
Posts: 1

Re: [roadstead] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well said ^. I miss the vibrancy and relevance of the old RC.com. I don't miss some of the ass hat attack mentality some posters had, but they were a small minority and often added needed counterpoint.
http://www.sales.care


(This post was edited by Samaran on Nov 9, 2015, 2:32 AM)


Rokjox


Nov 1, 2015, 7:24 PM
Post #69 of 238 (12441 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 13, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [Samaran] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

It was a yin/yang that fed the worm oroboros. but another thing that has killed it is how damn risky all this social media shee is.

People are leaving the SM or transferring to footbook the giant that eats all, the wallmart of the social self publishers. Snow white and the 7 dwarves sites.

There can only be one.

But the risk thisng is unreal. DAmn a lot of nuts in the sport, guys who want control for money. Making it, taking it. Then there are the stalkers, guys who hate what you say, no matter which side you are on, you will piss off somebody, and the wound is there in print forever.


Nobody respects the avatar as a gentlemans veil, the ficticious psuedonym that would allow people to explore TWO sides, make two arguments even for just the cause of exploring the argument. Someone has to take the less popular side, in debates the counter and the direct argument are assigned. No chpoise. Dont argue a conservative point here, you are going be lonely. The liberal perfume is still strong. But some guys will PUNISH you for honesty, much less devoious behavious.

Its like a snake or a crocodile, you can't tell if its dead, it can still bite in an instant after sitting motionless for days. Who can risk posting in an environment like this? 5 years after you post something, somebody decides you said something wrong and need to be punished?

I'm fucking showing a autistic/compulsive streak for even writing this.

And so are you, dear brother climbing zombie posters.


sungam


Nov 2, 2015, 7:33 AM
Post #70 of 238 (12414 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26797

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rokjox wrote:
I'm fucking showing a autistic/compulsive streak for even writing this.
Embrace the tism - it is as worthy a character trait as any.


jt512


Nov 3, 2015, 8:14 PM
Post #71 of 238 (12281 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rokjox wrote:
It was a yin/yang that fed the worm oroboros. but another thing that has killed it is how damn risky all this social media shee is.

People are leaving the SM or transferring to footbook the giant that eats all, the wallmart of the social self publishers. Snow white and the 7 dwarves sites.

There can only be one.

But the risk thisng is unreal. DAmn a lot of nuts in the sport, guys who want control for money. Making it, taking it. Then there are the stalkers, guys who hate what you say, no matter which side you are on, you will piss off somebody, and the wound is there in print forever.


Nobody respects the avatar as a gentlemans veil, the ficticious psuedonym that would allow people to explore TWO sides, make two arguments even for just the cause of exploring the argument. Someone has to take the less popular side, in debates the counter and the direct argument are assigned. No chpoise. Dont argue a conservative point here, you are going be lonely. The liberal perfume is still strong. But some guys will PUNISH you for honesty, much less devoious behavious.

Its like a snake or a crocodile, you can't tell if its dead, it can still bite in an instant after sitting motionless for days. Who can risk posting in an environment like this? 5 years after you post something, somebody decides you said something wrong and need to be punished?

I'm fucking showing a autistic/compulsive streak for even writing this.

And so are you, dear brother climbing zombie posters.

Hooray for drug-induced ranting! Maybe this place is making a comeback after all.


sungam


Nov 4, 2015, 11:17 AM
Post #72 of 238 (12248 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26797

Re: [jt512] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Hooray for drug-induced ranting! Maybe this place is making a comeback after all.
No, J, off topic, conversational, or comedic posts that do anything to make the forum less like a wiki article are BAD for the forums' activity and is what KILLS websites.

I know this because the mods told me, and clearly they know how to keep a website alive.

ayyyyyy


marc801


Nov 5, 2015, 9:50 AM
Post #73 of 238 (12198 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
I know this because the mods told me, and clearly they know how to keep a website alive.
Obviously they and the site owner are taking lessons from the gunks.com site owner.


6pacfershur


Nov 5, 2015, 9:58 PM
Post #74 of 238 (12163 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 22, 2010
Posts: 254

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
....... off topic, conversational, or comedic posts that do anything to make the forum less like a wiki article are BAD for the forums' activity and is what KILLS websites.....

so, .... on-topic, serious, one-sided posts that make the forum more like a wiki-article are GOOD for forum activity and NURTURE websites? interesting......


theguy


Nov 9, 2015, 12:41 PM
Post #75 of 238 (12187 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2004
Posts: 469

Re: [6pacfershur] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ironic that this is the most lively thread in ages.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?
$62.96 (10% off)
$89.06 (10% off)
$49.46 (10% off)
$125.96 (10% off)



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook