Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Trad Climbing:
Definition of Trad climbing?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Trad Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All


scubasnyder


Apr 13, 2004, 11:58 PM
Post #51 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 3, 2003
Posts: 1639

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Traditional climbing, climbing without bolts or anything, just climbing with trad gear


jv


Apr 14, 2004, 12:01 AM
Post #52 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 26, 2003
Posts: 363

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Second, you really think it'll only take 4 hours to master crack technique? Ask Randy Leavitt how long it took him to master his. Ask anyone whos ever flailed on any offwidth how long it takes to master crack technique. Supposedly, in 4 hours, I should be able to cruise any 5.12+ crack.....Again..not meant to be inflamatory, just comments and questions.
This is hyperbole, but has basis in fact. When Huber came over here, he went to Josh to learn crack technique before going to try the Salathe. If I remember correctly it took him about four days to go from getting spanked on a 5.8, to flashing low .12s, and getting high .12s after a try or two.

JV


shorty


Apr 14, 2004, 12:06 AM
Post #53 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2003
Posts: 1266

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
but I can't bring myself to call someone a "trad climber" unless they are placing gear (FA excluded).

Peter Croft is a trad climber?
When Peter Croft places his hand in a crack, it is gear.


moeman


Apr 14, 2004, 12:29 AM
Post #54 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 1, 2002
Posts: 1417

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
*This has been a really popular statement around the site these last few days, and yet it goes against every definition I have ever learned of sport and trad. Can you explain that?*

There are basically 2 kinds of free climbing on rock - crack climbing or face climbing. Here in Cali we have hundreds of relatively low angle granite domes. The routes on these domes do not necessarily follow crack systems - in fact, they rarely do. Instead you use face climbing technique, which involves frictioning and tiny edges. Of course there's usually no natural protection, so since the 1960's, starting in Yosemite and a few other places, climbers drilled bolts with a hammer and hand held drill for pro while leading the first ascent of these routes, usually from tenuous, insecure stances. These routes invariably had long distances between bolts due to the labor involved in stopping and drilling. Since the prevailing ethic of the day was ground-up, no one thought to come in from above on rappell and preplace the bolts, so in terms of style, for the first ascent anyway, these were considered trad routes.

A huge limitation of this approach, though, was the fact that you could only stop to drill on the lead if the rock was low angle enough to basically let go with both hands so you could hit the drill with the hammer. The best climbers were clearly capable of climbing the steeper faces, but the ability to protect it on the lead had not (and still has'nt) advanced. It was the Europeans, the French in particular, who, in the early to mid 80's, unhindered by the "traditional" ground up ethic, and with vast amounts of otherwise unprotectable, steep, crackless limestone, began to bolt on rappell, also using motorized drills which cut down the labor of drilling and with it the justification for sparse bolting, and "sport" climbing, for lack of a better term, was born.

It's pretty easy, though, to confuse a bolt protected "trad" route with a bolt protected "sport" route. Both are bolted face climbs - really the only difference, in this country anyway, is the bolted trad route tends to be low angle and runout, and the bolted sport route, steeper and not runout. But there are bolted trad routes that are not runout, and bolted sport routes that are. In my opinion the difference between sport face climbing and trad face climbing is not really protection, but difficulty.

Up to about medium 5.12, the modern sport route is little different from the hardest bolted trad routes of the pre-sport era - it basically took sport tactics (bolting on rappell) to push face climbing into hard 5.12 and beyond. The new ethic (or rather, lack thereof) meant that the extremely difficult, gymnastic moves that were practiced on boulders could now be used for the first time on actual climbs, and the artificial ceiling imposed by the ground up ethic could be dispensed with - the door to 5.13 face climbing was opened. There was widespread resistance to this among the old guard, who believed that all the old challenges would soon be bolted on rappell instead being left as bold ground-up projects for future generations, which did indeed happen, but when the top European sport climbers came to the US and did the hardest routes in the country with minimal effort, the final nail in the coffin of ground-up face climbing was driven. The new tactics also had the huge and unforseen benefit of opening up previously unprotectable and therefore untouched new climbing areas, a process which continues to this day.

Kalcario stikes agsin. Well put.


andypro


Apr 14, 2004, 1:45 AM
Post #55 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 23, 2003
Posts: 1077

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
This is hyperbole, but has basis in fact. When Huber came over here, he went to Josh to learn crack technique before going to try the Salathe. If I remember correctly it took him about four days to go from getting spanked on a 5.8, to flashing low .12s, and getting high .12s after a try or two.

JV

Granted, I heard this was the case as well. However, the hubers are friggin superhuman if you ask me. As for the average sport climber, I dont see it as feasible. Sure, if they already climb 13+ they might be able to power through with sloppy technique, or even pick it up relatively quickly due to thier abilityu to do so in the beginning.


kalcario


Apr 14, 2004, 2:50 AM
Post #56 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 1601

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

*Excellent point. I have pointed this out in the past but it seems that some prefer to assume that if a climber is from Europe, he doesn't have trad ethics. There was an article in Climbing a few years ago. I think Jeff Achey wrote it. It was a profile of Alex Huber, and it showed him 30 feet out on overhanging limestone. Why so far? He couldn't stop to place a bolt. He went on to disparage sport climbers. I will find it and quote from it. Suffice to say, you don't have to forsake traditional ethics to climb high numbers . . . at least not if you are incredibly determined, or incredibly gifted.*

Achey is about as journalistically balanced as Sean Hannity, he slanted the editorial tone of that article (and many others) to suit his anti-sport agenda. It's ridiculous to state that Huber is anti-sport, he spent years hangdogging hard routes in Europe, how do you think he got so good in the first place? NOBODY gets that good without sport climbing.

By the way, those "30 feet out on overhanging limestone" multi pitch alpine sport routes in Europe are more a product of expediency than adhering to ethics, basically on something that big it is simpler to climb up, hang from a hook and drill than it is rig a top-down civil engineering project on a 1000' wall. There really is no "trad vs sport" in Europe, there are guys in Spain and France you've never heard of who climb 5.14 sport, A5 on El Cap, waterfall ice and 8000 meter peaks.


Partner angry


Apr 14, 2004, 3:22 AM
Post #57 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Kalci baby, I know you are just trying to start a fight.

I need to clarify a few things from my last post. The sport climber in question spent 4 years dedicated to trad prior to his first sport experience. He could onsight mid 10 and redpoint 11a trad, his first trip to Wild Iris he was onsighting 11c/d and was getting 12's his second or third try. He's a touch better than that now.

I've spent many days with him on cracks, I'll attest that he knows crack technique better than the vast majority of "trads" you see in the cracks. He is the first person to admit that sport is fun because he can get big numbers.

4 hours to learn crack technique? Isn't that the average amount of time a sport climber spends on a 2 pitch 5.7 (I can name names :twisted: )


couloir


Apr 14, 2004, 3:30 AM
Post #58 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 4, 2001
Posts: 304

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Up and Over


curt


Apr 14, 2004, 3:30 AM
Post #59 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The really funny thing about this.....
In reply to:
Achey is about as journalistically balanced as Sean Hannity, he slanted the editorial tone of that article (and many others) to suit his anti-sport agenda. It's ridiculous to state that Huber is anti-sport, he spent years hangdogging hard routes in Europe, how do you think he got so good in the first place? NOBODY gets that good without sport climbing.
is that sportards like kalcario always claim that trad climbers will never get strong enough to pull hard moves unless they sport climb too.

Then you take the same sportards bouldering and guess what? You find out that they really can't pull hard moves either. :D

Curt


kalcario


Apr 14, 2004, 3:41 AM
Post #60 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 1601

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

*Kalci baby, I know you are just trying to start a fight.*

"Shooting fish in a barrel" is more like it. Sport isn't more fun than trad because of ratings. By far the biggest appeal of sport climbing is... it's overhanging. The steeper the climbing is, the more fun it is. Vertical-or-less literally doesn't even warm me up anymore. Ok it warms up my feet but that's it


jv


Apr 14, 2004, 4:50 AM
Post #61 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 26, 2003
Posts: 363

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Achey is about as journalistically balanced as Sean Hannity, he slanted the editorial tone of that article (and many others) to suit his anti-sport agenda. It's ridiculous to state that Huber is anti-sport, he spent years hangdogging hard routes in Europe, how do you think he got so good in the first place? NOBODY gets that good without sport climbing.

By the way, those "30 feet out on overhanging limestone" multi pitch alpine sport routes in Europe are more a product of expediency than adhering to ethics, basically on something that big it is simpler to climb up, hang from a hook and drill than it is rig a top-down civil engineering project on a 1000' wall. There really is no "trad vs sport" in Europe, there are guys in Spain and France you've never heard of who climb 5.14 sport, A5 on El Cap, waterfall ice and 8000 meter peaks.

You threw a lot of unsubstantiated prattle out there. But without some facts, it's just your opinion. And you know what that's worth. Put up or shut up.

JV


kalcario


Apr 14, 2004, 5:04 AM
Post #62 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 1601

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

*You threw a lot of unsubstantiated prattle out there. But without some facts, it's just your opinion. And you know what that's worth. Put up or shut up.*

Tell me what would you specifically like me to back up and I'll see what I can do for you.


kalcario


Apr 14, 2004, 5:09 AM
Post #63 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 1601

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

*Then you take the same sportards bouldering and guess what? You find out that they really can't pull hard moves either.*

Your drivel is not worth responding to anymore. Bye


jv


Apr 14, 2004, 5:11 AM
Post #64 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 26, 2003
Posts: 363

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
*You threw a lot of unsubstantiated prattle out there. But without some facts, it's just your opinion. And you know what that's worth. Put up or shut up.*

Tell me what would you specifically like me to back up and I'll see what I can do for you.
Pot luck. Pick a point at random and back it up with with a source.

JV


curt


Apr 14, 2004, 5:18 AM
Post #65 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
*Then you take the same sportards bouldering and guess what? You find out that they really can't pull hard moves either.*

Your drivel is not worth responding to anymore. Bye

That's about what I expected from Joe. Call his bluff and he runs away with his tail between his legs.

Curt


kalcario


Apr 14, 2004, 5:52 AM
Post #66 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 1601

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

*Pot luck. Pick a point at random and back it up with with a source.*

Be more specific please

...and what do you mean, "a source"? My source is Common Knowledge


jv


Apr 14, 2004, 3:23 PM
Post #67 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 26, 2003
Posts: 363

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
*Pot luck. Pick a point at random and back it up with with a source.*

Be more specific please

...and what do you mean, "a source"? My source is Common Knowledge

My source is an article in which in addition to the author's opinion, there are quotes from Huber himself. I will locate it and quote from it. Aside from the fact that there is no trad vs. sport debate in Europe, your "common knowledge" is nothing more than your unsubstantiated opinion without a source to back it up. So I challenge you again to put up or shut up.

JV


mtnbkrxtrordnair


Apr 14, 2004, 4:56 PM
Post #68 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 11, 2003
Posts: 267

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

[quote="curtThat's about what I expected from Joe. Call his bluff and he runs away with his tail between his legs.Curt
Word, If you call his bluff he won't respond cause his testicles have atrophied to the size of lentils from all the sport climbing.


alpinerockfiend


Apr 14, 2004, 5:08 PM
Post #69 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 3, 2003
Posts: 598

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wow. Things were off to such a nice start and I thought that I would certainly have a chance to put in my relavent two cents worth. Alas, I came back from class and it had digressed into the same flamewar with slightly different terms. I'll post anyway.

In reply to:
*Trad climbing or Traditional climbing refers to climbing a route that is protected by placing gear on lead.*

Nope. There are thousands of trad routes that are bolt protected - Tuolumne fo example. Bolt protected face climbing has been around way longer than sport climbing.

First of all, you are a gigantic douche and it's clear that you're being contrite for the sake of being contrite. As you yourself stated earlier, the routes in Tuolumne were drilled on lead. Who's to say that this wouldn't fit under the definition of gear in the aforementioned definition?

In reply to:
But the idea of top down route preparation is certainly a hall mark of sport climbing....A trad climber is a person who starts at the bottom of a climb and climbs to the top, without benefit of having prepared the route from the top down.
In reply to:
Rather than rehearsing the moves on a climb and hanging on the rope as in sport climbing, climbers work up to a hard route by doing many easier routes in “good style,” that is, from the ground up with no falls or hangs.

The ethic and definition of "trad" was somewhat different in Gallatin Canyon, MT. Many, if not most, of the harder trad lines established here in the early-mid 70's were toproped prior to a lead ascent. Moves were rehearsed, loose blocks and flakes were trundled on toprope and rappel... Sounds sort of like modern development of a sport route. Here's the conflict: When finally led, only passive pro would be used. And this is the early 70's, before the dawn of SLCDs. No pins (except in rare cases), no bolts. Many of these routes involve long, dangerous runouts and weird, oppositional nut placements between them. Sounds sort of like the headpoint ethic to me... is this not trad?
I'm not trying to say that fixed pro automatically rules the route out of trad classification. Just yesterday we were outin the canyon and encountered two of the area's most respected climbers toproping and cleaning an interesting, difficult face line with insipient cracks that would accept small gear with big runouts between. On a steep buttress next to the new climb, there was an ancient route that sported a couple of buttonheads on an otherwise featureless face. At the top, there was a ratty and faded sling anchor. We were curious about the climb, and asked the route developers next to us about it. They seemed to agree that the fixed pro was dubious at best, but "hats off to the ground-up style".


antepater


Apr 15, 2004, 2:27 AM
Post #70 of 70 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2004
Posts: 22

Re: Definition of Trad climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

apples and oranges if you ask me. I enjoy both in different circumstances but in general would prefer to trad. I really enjoy placing my own pro.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Trad Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook