|
sul-pont
Deleted
Feb 18, 2005, 7:02 PM
Post #1 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered:
Posts:
|
Obviously not for the masterpoint, but in other parts of an anchor configuation (slings, bolts, cordelette, etc.), instead of straight-gate D biners?
|
|
|
|
|
shakylegs
Feb 18, 2005, 7:10 PM
Post #2 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 4774
|
Don't see why not. I use 'em but, as you said, not as the masterpoint.
|
|
|
|
|
taino
Feb 18, 2005, 7:12 PM
Post #3 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 2, 2003
Posts: 5371
|
No disadvantage. T
|
|
|
|
|
climb_high4life
Feb 18, 2005, 7:15 PM
Post #4 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2005
Posts: 60
|
I don't see any disadvantage over wire gates. Just make sure that they're opposing and you should be good.
|
|
|
|
|
enjoimx
Feb 23, 2005, 5:34 AM
Post #5 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: 378
|
Whats so bad about using them as the masterpoint?
|
|
|
|
|
abraxas
Feb 23, 2005, 5:39 AM
Post #6 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2005
Posts: 66
|
In reply to: Whats so bad about using them as the masterpoint? Correct. No problem there either, as long as they are opposite and opposed.
|
|
|
|
|
abraxas
Feb 23, 2005, 5:40 AM
Post #7 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2005
Posts: 66
|
In reply to: Masterpoint needs to be a locker Wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
anykineclimb
Feb 23, 2005, 5:40 AM
Post #8 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 30, 2003
Posts: 3593
|
Masterpoint needs to be a locker
|
|
|
|
|
abraxas
Feb 23, 2005, 5:41 AM
Post #9 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2005
Posts: 66
|
In reply to: Masterpoint needs to be a locker Wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Feb 23, 2005, 6:14 AM
Post #10 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
a powerpoint can be either a locker or two non-lockers opposite and opposed. wiregates can be used for anything you want to use 'em for.
|
|
|
|
|
abraxas
Feb 23, 2005, 6:23 AM
Post #11 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2005
Posts: 66
|
In reply to: Sorry, IF its a single biner, the powerpoint needs to be a locker. Better? much better.
|
|
|
|
|
anykineclimb
Feb 23, 2005, 6:23 AM
Post #12 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 30, 2003
Posts: 3593
|
Sorry, IF its a single biner, the powerpoint needs to be a locker. Better?
|
|
|
|
|
abraxas
Feb 23, 2005, 6:24 AM
Post #13 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2005
Posts: 66
|
In reply to: Sorry, IF its a single biner, the powerpoint needs to be a locker. Better? Yes, much better.
|
|
|
|
|
kalcario
Feb 23, 2005, 6:26 AM
Post #14 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 1601
|
*Sorry, IF its a single biner, the powerpoint needs to be a locker. Better?* I guess...but I'd still rather have 2 opposed non-lockers instead of one locker...
|
|
|
|
|
abraxas
Feb 23, 2005, 6:33 AM
Post #15 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2005
Posts: 66
|
In reply to: *Sorry, IF its a single biner, the powerpoint needs to be a locker. Better?* I guess...but I'd still rather have 2 opposed non-lockers instead of one locker... Me too.
|
|
|
|
|
gamehendge
Feb 23, 2005, 7:10 AM
Post #16 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 2, 2004
Posts: 398
|
In reply to: In reply to: *Sorry, IF its a single biner, the powerpoint needs to be a locker. Better?* I guess...but I'd still rather have 2 opposed non-lockers instead of one locker... Me too. two opposed one locker and one wiregate is what i find ideal. And I prefer using wiregates on everything especially on the rope end of a draw/sling. Much easier to clip into.
|
|
|
|
|
jackhammer
Feb 23, 2005, 10:51 AM
Post #17 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2004
Posts: 255
|
no disadvantage...might even be a little stronger than straight gate biners
|
|
|
|
|
dirtineye
Feb 23, 2005, 12:36 PM
Post #18 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590
|
In reply to: ... I'd still rather have 2 opposed non-lockers instead of one locker... There's at least one really clever good reason for this. Anyone who doesn't know why want to take a guess?
|
|
|
|
|
tisar
Feb 23, 2005, 12:46 PM
Post #19 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 1, 2004
Posts: 2577
|
In reply to: In reply to: ... I'd still rather have 2 opposed non-lockers instead of one locker... There's at least one really clever good reason for this. Anyone who doesn't know why want to take a guess? ... rather ... 2 ... instead ... one ... :?: - Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
adamwvt
Feb 23, 2005, 1:41 PM
Post #20 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2002
Posts: 146
|
Just a stab, but two is better, because you are all set up to haul with a garda hitch if need be.
|
|
|
|
|
azrockclimber
Feb 23, 2005, 2:01 PM
Post #21 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 666
|
gotta be a locker to be the safest..however I have used a wire gate to clip into sport anchors many times. Personal choice and level of safety desired
|
|
|
|
|
michelleh
Feb 23, 2005, 2:08 PM
Post #22 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 8, 2004
Posts: 57
|
Before saying anything, I do NOT trad climb. However, the only place that I have heard where it is better not to use a wiregate is when using nuts as they need a much smaller opening to be unclipped (due to the width of the wire). Any comments?
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Feb 23, 2005, 2:45 PM
Post #23 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
i've had it happen- almost lost half my stoppers when they worked out of one of my ovalwires. other folks havent had any problems at all....so, who knows.
|
|
|
|
|
illimaniman
Feb 23, 2005, 3:13 PM
Post #24 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 21, 2002
Posts: 128
|
Yeah, I would say don't rack your nuts on a wiregate carabiner, as there is a risk of them working their way off of the biner. As for using a wiregate biner on the pro end of your draw, I've never done it and don't know what the possibility is of it coming undone.
|
|
|
|
|
neurostar
Feb 23, 2005, 10:45 PM
Post #25 of 51
(6823 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 7, 2004
Posts: 153
|
Isn't there less of an issue with gate flutter when using wiregate 'biners?
|
|
|
|
|
|