Forums: Community: Campground:
wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS....
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Campground

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page Last page  View All


alx


Jun 27, 2006, 9:21 PM
Post #101 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 22, 2003
Posts: 159

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

I got thrown out of a movie theater because they noticed I was packing three bananna cream pies. Some damn commie "no food from outside" policy. I don't know about you people but I never leave the house without my pies. What if I walk into a store and some clowns want to start a pie fight? I could show you many many instances of innocent people getting creamed just because they were too unprepared to defend themselves. I for one won't be cowed into giving up my constitutional right to defend myself and I'm willing to fight for it. Make pies illegal and only clowns will have pies. Where will we be then? I don't know where but we'll probably be forced to wear big floppy shoes.


rhaig


Jun 27, 2006, 9:48 PM
Post #102 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 2179

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

I didn't mean how often does it happen to you, I meant how often does it happen, period.

Browsing the CDC it looks like there are 0.04 gunshot homicides per capita in the US per year. Compare that to 2.24 deaths/capita for heart disease and 2.0 for cancer.

This is why people are calling you guys paranoid....it's incredibly unlikely for you to be involved in a situation where your gun would be needed.


considering that I'm more worried about being a victim of a generic violent crime than a specific homicide, I'll consider some different stats. from http://www.fbi.gov/...ent_crime/index.html
in 2004 there were 465 violent crimes per 100000 people. that's 0.4655% chance that I'll be a victim of such a crime in any given year. that doesn't take into account crimes against many people, or robberies of stores with many people in them. This is crimes reported per 100000 populous.

I don't know how those heart disease numbers were calculated, but I'm guessing you mis-communicated. as 2.24 deaths per capita per year would mean that everyone dies 2.24 times this year.

and yes, it is incredibly unlikely that I'll ever be in a situation where I'll need my gun. That doesn't mean I shouldn't be able to carry it.


epic_ed


Jun 27, 2006, 10:16 PM
Post #103 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2002
Posts: 4724

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Is anybody's mind going to change here?

Does it ever? Nah...but you pick your battles, I suppose. This is one I obviously feel a bit more passioned about than some of the generic political debates. It looks like a few others, do, too.

It's partly your fault, anyways. I hadn't owned a gun for several years when I visited your place -- got my trigger finger itchy again. I've been scratchin it ever since. Looks like I might have to bring my wallet with me next time I'm up there.

Ed


rhaig


Jun 27, 2006, 10:36 PM
Post #104 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 2179

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I got thrown out of a movie theater because they noticed I was packing three bananna cream pies. Some damn commie "no food from outside" policy. I don't know about you people but I never leave the house without my pies. What if I walk into a store and some clowns want to start a pie fight? I could show you many many instances of innocent people getting creamed just because they were too unprepared to defend themselves. I for one won't be cowed into giving up my constitutional right to defend myself and I'm willing to fight for it. Make pies illegal and only clowns will have pies. Where will we be then? I don't know where but we'll probably be forced to wear big floppy shoes.
You can go around thinking that you'll never be assaulted by a cream pie, but look at the news...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/...1022042coulter1.html

these things happen all the time.


alx


Jun 27, 2006, 11:16 PM
Post #105 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 22, 2003
Posts: 159

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

...and poor Ann powerless to defend herself! What if that was you're child up there dodging desserts? If you think I gonna stand by and watch as my family lives in fear you've got another thing coming.

We all need to start writing letters to our congressmen telling them to vote against the pending legislation on whipped cream registration.


dangle


Jun 27, 2006, 11:48 PM
Post #106 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 2, 2004
Posts: 814

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

They are coming out with some excellent rigs for concealing pies these days.


beta


Jun 28, 2006, 2:31 AM
Post #107 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 17, 2001
Posts: 204

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Hmmmm, food for thought.

40 Reasons To Support Gun Control

1. Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, and Chicago cops need guns.

2. Washington DC’s low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis’ high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.

3. Statistics showing high murder rates justify gun control but statistics showing increasing murder rates after gun control are "just statistics."

4. The Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban, both of which went into effect in 1994, are responsible for the decrease in violent crime rates, which have been declining since 1991.

5. We must get rid of guns because a deranged lunatic may go on a shooting spree at any time and anyone who would own a gun out of fear of such a lunatic is paranoid.

6. The more helpless you are the safer you are from criminals.

7. An intruder will be incapacitated by tear gas or oven spray, but if shot with a .357 Magnum will get angry and kill you.

8. A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.

9. When confronted by violent criminals, you should "put up no defense — give them what they want, or run" (Handgun Control Inc. Chairman Pete Shields, Guns Don't Die - People Do, 1981, p. 125).

10. The New England Journal of Medicine is filled with expert advice about guns; just like Guns and Ammo has some excellent treatises on heart surgery.

11. One should consult an automotive engineer for safer seatbelts, a civil engineer for a better bridge, a surgeon for spinal paralysis, a computer programmer for Y2K problems, and Sarah Brady [or Sheena Duncan, Adele Kirsten, Peter Storey, etc.] for firearms expertise.

12. The 2nd Amendment, ratified in 1787, refers to the National Guard, which was created by an act of Congress in 1917.

13. The National Guard, funded by the federal government, occupying property leased to the federal government, using weapons owned by the federal government, punishing trespassers under federal law, is a state militia.

14. These phrases," right of the people peaceably to assemble," "right of the people to be secure in their homes," "enumeration's herein of certain rights shall not be construed to disparage others retained by the people," and "The powers not delegated herein are reserved to the states respectively, and to the people," all refer to individuals, but "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" refers to the state.

15. We don't need guns against an oppressive government, because the Constitution has internal safeguards, but we should ban and seize all guns, thereby violating the 2nd, 4th, and 5th amendments to that Constitution.

16. Rifles and handguns aren't necessary to national defense, which is why the army has millions of them.

17. Private citizens shouldn't have handguns, because they serve no military purpose, and private citizens shouldn't have "assault rifles," because they are military weapons.

18. The ready availability of guns today, with waiting periods, background checks, fingerprinting, government forms, et cetera, is responsible for recent school shootings,compared to the lack of school shootings in the 40's, 50's and 60's, which resulted from the availability of guns at hardware stores, surplus stores, gas stations, variety stores, mail order, et cetera

19. The NRA's attempt to run a "don't touch" campaign about kids handling guns is propaganda, and the anti-gun lobby's attempt to run a "don't touch" campaign is responsible social activity.

20. Guns are so complex that special training is necessary to use them properly, and so simple to use that they make murder easy.

21. A handgun, with up to 4 controls, is far too complex for the typical adult to learn to use, as opposed to an automobile that only has 20.

22. Women are just as intelligent and capable as men but a woman with a gun is "an accident waiting to happen" and gun makers' advertisements aimed at women are "preying on their fears."

23. Ordinary people in the presence of guns turn into slaughtering butchers but revert to normal when the weapon is removed.

24. Guns cause violence, which is why there are so many mass killings at gun shows.

25. A majority of the population supports gun control, just like a majority of the population supported owning slaves.

26. A self-loading small arm can legitimately be considered to be a "weapon of mass destruction" or an "assault weapon."

27. Most people can't be trusted, so we should have laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.

28. The right of online pornographers to exist cannot be questioned because it is constitutionally protected by the Bill of Rights, but the use of handguns for self defense is not really protected by the Bill of Rights.

29. Free speech entitles one to own newspapers, transmitters, computers, and typewriters, but self-defense only justifies bare hands.

30. The ACLU is good because it uncompromisingly defends certain parts of the Constitution, and the NRA is bad, because it defends other parts of the Constitution.

31. Charlton Heston as president of the NRA is a shill who should be ignored, but Michael Douglas as a representative of Handgun Control, Inc. is an ambassador for peace who is entitled to an audience at the UN arms control summit.

32. Police operate with backup within groups, which is why they need larger capacity pistol magazines than do "civilians" who must face criminals alone and therefore need less ammunition.

33. We should ban "Saturday Night Specials" and other inexpensive guns because it's not fair that poor people have access to guns too.

34. Police officers, who qualify with their duty weapons once or twice a year, have some special Jedi-like mastery over handguns that private citizens can never hope to obtain.

35. Private citizens don't need a gun for self-protection because the police are there to protect them even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.

36. Citizens don't need to carry a gun for personal protection but police chiefs, who are desk-bound administrators who work in a building filled with cops, need a gun.

37. "Assault weapons" have no purpose other than to kill large numbers of people, which is why the police need them but "civilians" do not.

38. When Microsoft pressures its distributors to give Microsoft preferential promotion, that's bad; but when the Federal government pressures cities to buy guns only from Smith & Wesson, that's good.

39. Trigger locks do not interfere with the ability to use a gun for defensive purposes, which is why you see police officers with one on their duty weapon.

40. When Handgun Control, Inc., says they want to "keep guns out of the wrong hands," they just mean you, not the heads of their organization.

All that being said, I would rather have a gun in my hands than a cop on the phone.

beta
(mostly harmless)


zozo


Jun 28, 2006, 3:49 AM
Post #108 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 3, 2004
Posts: 3431

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:


Would I rather run away? Yep -- retreat is almost always the first and best option. If I can't, then I'd much rather have the option of drawing my gun than pulling a knife in order to stop the attack. It doesn't seem like such a stretch to understand why this would be my choice, but if you don't get it, then you just don't get it. I think you're in denial.

If someone is close enough to you to pull a knife as an actual threat and you pull a gun, chances are he will drop the knife and go for the gun. If you lose the gun your dead. Why do people think a gun is such an automatic victory?

I will take an empty handed knife defense against pulling a gun in a close situation anyday.


rhaig


Jun 28, 2006, 4:59 AM
Post #109 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 2179

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

If someone is close enough to you to pull a knife as an actual threat and you pull a gun, chances are he will drop the knife and go for the gun. If you lose the gun your dead. Why do people think a gun is such an automatic victory?

I will take an empty handed knife defense against pulling a gun in a close situation anyday.

when the vca drops his knife and reaches for my gun, the only way I haven't shot him yet is if it's still in the holster. in which case, I've disarmed him (though he did the work for me) and occupied at least one of his hands. Now I can pull my knife with my left hand and start cutting on him while my right hand keeps my weapon in it's holster. once he's well enough cut, and made aware of it, he'll let go and try to get away. That's when I draw my gun, take a few steps back as space allows and (wait for it...) see what his next move is. Disarmed, and injured, most VCA's run, or try to reacquire their weapon and run. The ones that don't, well... I'd rather not sit through a grand jury hearing, but I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 (as the old saying goes).

Having a gun isn't an automatic victory. It's just another tool in the toolbox. I also have some tactical training in my toolbox. And a couple of knives. I've been through these scnearios with fake guns, training knives, and been on the attacker, defender, and wining and losing sides (won and lost from both sides of the scenario). Training isn't real life, but it's better than bitching about what you think might happen in some web forum based off of what you've seen in the movies or some other grasseater told you.


zozo


Jun 28, 2006, 5:26 AM
Post #110 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 3, 2004
Posts: 3431

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

when the vca drops his knife and reaches for my gun, the only way I haven't shot him yet is if it's still in the holster.

Your a tool...

In reply to:
in which case, I've disarmed him (though he did the work for me) and occupied at least one of his hands. Now I can pull my knife with my left hand and start cutting on him while my right hand keeps my weapon in it's holster. once he's well enough cut, and made aware of it, he'll let go and try to get away. That's when I draw my gun, take a few steps back as space allows and (wait for it...) see what his next move is.

Your a tool

In reply to:
Disarmed, and injured, most VCA's run, or try to reacquire their weapon and run. The ones that don't, well... I'd rather not sit through a grand jury hearing, but I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 (as the old saying goes).


Your a tool


In reply to:
Having a gun isn't an automatic victory. It's just another tool in the toolbox. I also have some tactical training in my toolbox. And a couple of knives. I've been through these scnearios with fake guns, training knives, and been on the attacker, defender, and wining and losing sides (won and lost from both sides of the scenario). Training isn't real life, but it's better than b---- about what you think might happen in some web forum based off of what you've seen in the movies or some other grasseater told you.


There dont seem to be enough letter "O"'s in the word tool to describe what a tool you are.


epic_ed


Jun 28, 2006, 6:14 AM
Post #111 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2002
Posts: 4724

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Dude, there's no need to bust out with the name calling. He gave a resaonable response to how he would handle a CQC situation. If you don't agree with it -- fine -- it's your choice how you'd prefer to face close combat with a person armed with a knife. Mine would be different. If you have taken the time and made the effort to learn some self-defense techniques to give yourself a chance at surviving a knife attack, that's great. I think that's just another layer of preparedness you can add. But if you can do that, you can also take the time to do some very basic tactical weapons training and learn about weapon retention techniques and close quarter combat skills. Just another tool. As Tradman mentioned, a real fight is never cleat cut and by the book. Its bound to get messy regardless of training or preparation and it never goes as expected. That doesn't mean you shouldn't choose the weapons and options that give you the best chance for survival. You go hand to hand if you want. I'll draw.

Ed


overlord


Jun 28, 2006, 7:47 AM
Post #112 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I got thrown out of a movie theater because they noticed I was packing three bananna cream pies. Some damn commie "no food from outside" policy. I don't know about you people but I never leave the house without my pies. What if I walk into a store and some clowns want to start a pie fight? I could show you many many instances of innocent people getting creamed just because they were too unprepared to defend themselves. I for one won't be cowed into giving up my constitutional right to defend myself and I'm willing to fight for it. Make pies illegal and only clowns will have pies. Where will we be then? I don't know where but we'll probably be forced to wear big floppy shoes.

and what if youre attacked with pickles?? those evil little green things.

borrowed form this thread...


Partner tradman


Jun 28, 2006, 9:36 AM
Post #113 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Dude, there's no need to bust out with the name calling. He gave a resaonable response to how he would handle a CQC situation. If you don't agree with it -- fine -- it's your choice how you'd prefer to face close combat with a person armed with a knife. Mine would be different. If you have taken the time and made the effort to learn some self-defense techniques to give yourself a chance at surviving a knife attack, that's great. I think that's just another layer of preparedness you can add. But if you can do that, you can also take the time to do some very basic tactical weapons training and learn about weapon retention techniques and close quarter combat skills. Just another tool. As Tradman mentioned, a real fight is never cleat cut and by the book. Its bound to get messy regardless of training or preparation and it never goes as expected. That doesn't mean you should choose the weapons and options that give you the best chance for survival. You go hand to hand if you want. I'll draw.


AHAHAHAHAHAAAA!

Ed "The Snake" faces down another imaginary opponent in the mirror. He snarls and cracks his neck. "So you gonna draw, varmint? I'll draw" BAM! He spits juicily. "Ya shoulda drawn, boy".

(cue harmonica riff)

Meanwhile in the real world, is someone who's holding a knife pointed at you really going to let you fumble with your gun, get it out, unsafety it, point it at them and shoot? Or will they just stab you the instant your hand goes for the gun?

In reply to:
I've disarmed him (though he did the work for me) and occupied at least one of his hands. Now I can pull my knife with my left hand and start cutting on him while my right hand keeps my weapon in it's holster. once he's well enough cut, and made aware of it, he'll let go and try to get away.

Elite ninja commando Rhaig-sensei fights with his mind. Or at least, all his fights occur in his mind. He seamlessly flows through the secret techniques of his imaginary art, or at least he will, or pretends that he will.

These scenarios are comical. Please post more (but try to avoid just ripping off the Steven Seagal films you're so obviously overly fond of would you? Thanks!)

:lol:


thorne
Deleted

Jun 28, 2006, 12:09 PM
Post #114 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered:
Posts:

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Your a tool...
In reply to:
Your a tool
In reply to:
Your a tool
In reply to:

The possessive of you means something completely different than the contraction of you are.

If you're going to resort to cheap ad hominem attacks, you should try to get your words rite.


rhaig


Jun 28, 2006, 1:00 PM
Post #115 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 2179

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
There dont seem to be enough letter "O"'s in the word tool to describe what a tool you are.

I know you are but what am I

:P

are we done being 9 now or do I have to call my mom?


rhaig


Jun 28, 2006, 1:00 PM
Post #116 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 2179

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
and what if youre attacked with pickles?? those evil little green things.

borrowed form this thread...

as long as it's not a pointed stick


kubi


Jun 28, 2006, 1:06 PM
Post #117 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 15, 2004
Posts: 815

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:

I didn't mean how often does it happen to you, I meant how often does it happen, period.

Browsing the CDC it looks like there are 0.04 gunshot homicides per capita in the US per year. Compare that to 2.24 deaths/capita for heart disease and 2.0 for cancer.

This is why people are calling you guys paranoid....it's incredibly unlikely for you to be involved in a situation where your gun would be needed.


considering that I'm more worried about being a victim of a generic violent crime than a specific homicide, I'll consider some different stats. from http://www.fbi.gov/...ent_crime/index.html
in 2004 there were 465 violent crimes per 100000 people. that's 0.4655% chance that I'll be a victim of such a crime in any given year. that doesn't take into account crimes against many people, or robberies of stores with many people in them. This is crimes reported per 100000 populous.

I don't know how those heart disease numbers were calculated, but I'm guessing you mis-communicated. as 2.24 deaths per capita per year would mean that everyone dies 2.24 times this year.

and yes, it is incredibly unlikely that I'll ever be in a situation where I'll need my gun. That doesn't mean I shouldn't be able to carry it.

I totally fucked up those statistics, I thought "per capita" meants "per 1000 people" :oops: :oops: My stats should read, "Compare that to 0.224% chance of dying from heart disease and 0.20% for cancer."


rhaig


Jun 28, 2006, 1:07 PM
Post #118 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 2179

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Dude, there's no need to bust out with the name calling. He gave a resaonable response to how he would handle a CQC situation. If you don't agree with it -- fine -- it's your choice how you'd prefer to face close combat with a person armed with a knife. Mine would be different. If you have taken the time and made the effort to learn some self-defense techniques to give yourself a chance at surviving a knife attack, that's great. I think that's just another layer of preparedness you can add. But if you can do that, you can also take the time to do some very basic tactical weapons training and learn about weapon retention techniques and close quarter combat skills. Just another tool. As Tradman mentioned, a real fight is never cleat cut and by the book. Its bound to get messy regardless of training or preparation and it never goes as expected. That doesn't mean you should choose the weapons and options that give you the best chance for survival. You go hand to hand if you want. I'll draw.

Ed

I'd prefer to be a master at escrima and kung fu (a good friend has an introduction to escrima and several years of kung fu training). At that point a gun wouldn't get me that much extra equalizing factor. But my family takes up most of my non-work time leaving little martial arts.

isn't that what he meant by calling me a tool? implying that I should hone my hand to hand combat skills?


rhaig


Jun 28, 2006, 1:19 PM
Post #119 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 2179

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Dude, there's no need to bust out with the name calling. He gave a resaonable response to how he would handle a CQC situation. If you don't agree with it -- fine -- it's your choice how you'd prefer to face close combat with a person armed with a knife. Mine would be different. If you have taken the time and made the effort to learn some self-defense techniques to give yourself a chance at surviving a knife attack, that's great. I think that's just another layer of preparedness you can add. But if you can do that, you can also take the time to do some very basic tactical weapons training and learn about weapon retention techniques and close quarter combat skills. Just another tool. As Tradman mentioned, a real fight is never cleat cut and by the book. Its bound to get messy regardless of training or preparation and it never goes as expected. That doesn't mean you should choose the weapons and options that give you the best chance for survival. You go hand to hand if you want. I'll draw.


AHAHAHAHAHAAAA!

Ed "The Snake" faces down another imaginary opponent in the mirror. He snarls and cracks his neck. "So you gonna draw, varmint? I'll draw" BAM! He spits juicily. "Ya shoulda drawn, boy".

(cue harmonica riff)

Meanwhile in the real world, is someone who's holding a knife pointed at you really going to let you fumble with your gun, get it out, unsafety it, point it at them and shoot? Or will they just stab you the instant your hand goes for the gun?
and once you're stabbed once you're dead right? can't continue the draw motion and fire?
In reply to:
In reply to:
I've disarmed him (though he did the work for me) and occupied at least one of his hands. Now I can pull my knife with my left hand and start cutting on him while my right hand keeps my weapon in it's holster. once he's well enough cut, and made aware of it, he'll let go and try to get away.

Elite ninja commando Rhaig-sensei fights with his mind. Or at least, all his fights occur in his mind. He seamlessly flows through the secret techniques of his imaginary art, or at least he will, or pretends that he will.

These scenarios are comical. Please post more (but try to avoid just ripping off the Steven Seagal films you're so obviously overly fond of would you? Thanks!)

:lol:

again you selectively quote me (or maybe you didn't read the whole thing). go back and read where I've been through these scenarios in training (not my mind). These training scenarios were designed by people who work in cities where guns are banned (tough cities) and are not comical. (neither the people nor the scenarios).

And have you seen any Segal flicks lately, they've gone way downhill. I caught about 15min of one the other day when I was channel surfing. I'd rather beat a dead horse about rockclimbing in the gun control forums.



let me state that I'm not trying to change anyone's mind about carrying a gun. if you're not wanting to carry a gun, it's going to take a lot more than any of us here can say to change you. I was going to say I just want to explain to you why I carry, but I've already explained that and been called names for it. so that's it. I don't really have anything else to say on this topic other than If anyone wants to carry a gun to defend themselves, I believe they should get some professional tactical training. It will greatly change the way you look at concealed carry.

done


kubi


Jun 28, 2006, 1:25 PM
Post #120 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 15, 2004
Posts: 815

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
BUNCH OF STUFF

All that being said, I would rather have a gun in my hands than a cop on the phone.

beta
(mostly harmless)

I was going to go through that god-awful list and refute the more blatantly illogical statements, but there were too many of them. Most of those don't apply to the points we are bringing up anyway.

I would like to bring up the point that I am in favor of gun control not to keep guns out of my own hands....it's to keep the guns out of the hands of people who will mis-use them. Let's be honest, the majority of Americans are complete fuckin' idiots* and I don't want them carrying.

The other big reason I'm in favor of gun control is because I do not want to be forced to kill anyone. If everyone carries a gun then I am much more likely to need to carry a gun, which means that I may be required to draw it, which means I may be required to shoot someone.


*Please refer to Arrested Development v. Fox, 2005


Partner tradman


Jun 28, 2006, 2:07 PM
Post #121 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
and once you're stabbed once you're dead right? can't continue the draw motion and fire?

Elite ninja commando Rhaig-sensei senses the attack before it begins. He shifts seamlessly into weasel style and goes for his gun, turning the incoming blade on his shoulder, leaving no lasting damage other than a fetching scar which will make men respectful and women want to have sex with him. Despite the wound, he continues with his draw and shoots the evil man dead.

You really think he's going to stab you just once? When you've got a gun and are trying to kill him?

:lol:

Again, I appreciate that you're desperate to learn some hard and fast rule which will calm your fear of this sort of thing, but there isn't one. You could be stabbed 20 times and live, or die instantly from one wound.


boondock_saint


Jun 28, 2006, 3:02 PM
Post #122 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
and once you're stabbed once you're dead right? can't continue the draw motion and fire?

Elite ninja commando Rhaig-sensei senses the attack before it begins. He shifts seamlessly into weasel style and goes for his gun, turning the incoming blade on his shoulder, leaving no lasting damage other than a fetching scar which will make men respectful and women want to have sex with him. Despite the wound, he continues with his draw and shoots the evil man dead.

You really think he's going to stab you just once? When you've got a gun and are trying to kill him?

:lol:

Again, I appreciate that you're desperate to learn some hard and fast rule which will calm your fear of this sort of thing, but there isn't one. You could be stabbed 20 times and live, or die instantly from one wound.

When I was 11 (during the war) I watched my friends uncle get stabbed 30 or so times. He lived. Actually lives here in St. Louis now.

Another friend's uncle got shot in front of our building. Took 4 in the abdomen. Die hard son of a bitch drove himself to the hospital. He lived too.

So you see guns & knifes can be quite ineffective at killing people. If you want to make sure they are dead, you have to nuke 'em.


epic_ed


Jun 28, 2006, 3:27 PM
Post #123 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2002
Posts: 4724

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Tradman, the human pin cushion. Like I said, if you prefer to fend off a knife attack hand-to-hand, that's fine with me. I'd much rather have a gun to draw. I know you don't get it. Everyone who carries a gun, in your mind, is a simpleton cowboy. Keep thinking that, bro. Bury your head in the sand and ignore the fact that millions of us carry concealed every day and there isn't a morgue around the country that is stacking bodies like cord wood because a bunch a lunatics with CCW's went on a rampage. Nope -- the only bodies at the morgue are those of victims of violent crimes, committed by criminals. And the occasional perp who got stopped by someone who was carrying concealed.

Ed


epic_ed


Jun 28, 2006, 3:32 PM
Post #124 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2002
Posts: 4724

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Here's a good story for you:

http://www.azcentral.com/...robbery28-ON-CR.html

In reply to:
Two armed men robbed 20 customers at a central Phoenix restaurant Tuesday night, according to officials.

Phoenix police officers said the men stormed the New China Buffet near 24th Street and Thomas Road around 9 p.m., taking wallets, purses and jewelry from everyone inside.

One of the robbers fled the scene in a customer’s Hummer. The other man left in the Ford Bronco the two arrived in. advertisement

Police traced the license plate of the Bronco to an area near 73rd Avenue and Camelback Road. Plain clothed officers searched the area overnight and found and arrested one of the suspects. They also took a second man into custody they think was the accomplice.

Investigators said there were no injuries as a result of the crime or arrests but that one of the suspects was taken to a local hospital for an unrelated illness.

Stay with azcentral.com for updates.

Reach the reporter at ckline@azcentral.com or at (602) 523-3123.

Trad, and others -- what do you think I would have done in this situation? What do think the average person with a CCW would have done? I'll bet I know the answer, but please -- let's hear it from you.

Ed


Partner macherry


Jun 28, 2006, 3:39 PM
Post #125 of 211 (3378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: wHY WE NEED TO CARRY FIREARMS.... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

i would have given my wallet and not confronted the robbers.

what would you have done ed?

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Community : Campground

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook