|
ctardi
Nov 21, 2006, 2:12 AM
Post #1 of 11
(3159 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 8, 2004
Posts: 1278
|
Not sure if this has been mentioned, but there is not a way to see whom you are quoting. Gets kind of confusing when you don't remember whom (did I use that right?) said what...
|
|
|
|
|
thomasribiere
Nov 21, 2006, 11:58 AM
Post #3 of 11
(3144 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9306
|
It might be YOUR computer... 
|
|
|
|
|
sangiro
Nov 21, 2006, 12:17 PM
Post #4 of 11
(3143 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 8, 2003
Posts: 304
|
Hey Cam.
I understand what you're saying. The current code base does not parse "quote" tags in a way that makes it possible to indicate who the quote is attributed to. I'll look into creating something like [quote:username] and use that as an indicator of who spoke the word.
Give me some time to work on this one. I'll post updates here as we make progress.
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Nov 21, 2006, 5:30 PM
Post #5 of 11
(3132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
Oh, man, that would be fantastic. Been annoying me to no end, it has! Thanks, Willem.
|
|
|
|
|
ctardi
Nov 21, 2006, 6:49 PM
Post #6 of 11
(3128 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 8, 2004
Posts: 1278
|
Thanks!
You replying has created another bug, but i'll post that in a new thread.
|
|
|
|
|
htotsu
Nov 25, 2006, 7:04 AM
Post #8 of 11
(3095 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 673
|
sangiro wrote: ctardi wrote: Not sure if this has been mentioned, but there is not a way to see whom you are quoting. Gets kind of confusing when you don't remember whom (did I use that right?) said what... Cam, Ok - we've implemented this. Quotes should be a lot easier to follow now. You can use the following format to indicate whom the quote belongs to. [qu0te "username"]Text goes here [/qu0te] Clicking on the quote link at the top of a post will automatically quote the person who the post belongs to. The 0's in the example above should of course be o's. 
EXCELLENT!!!!!!!! Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
thomasribiere
Nov 25, 2006, 11:45 AM
Post #9 of 11
(3088 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9306
|
htotsu wrote: sangiro wrote: ctardi wrote: Not sure if this has been mentioned, but there is not a way to see whom you are quoting. Gets kind of confusing when you don't remember whom (did I use that right?) said what... Cam, Ok - we've implemented this. Quotes should be a lot easier to follow now. You can use the following format to indicate whom the quote belongs to. [qu0te "username"]Text goes here [/qu0te] Clicking on the quote link at the top of a post will automatically quote the person who the post belongs to. The 0's in the example above should of course be o's. EXCELLENT!!!!!!!! Thanks
good!
|
|
|
|
|
kachoong
Nov 25, 2006, 2:00 PM
Post #10 of 11
(3084 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304
|
thomasribiere wrote: htotsu wrote: sangiro wrote: ctardi wrote: Not sure if this has been mentioned, but there is not a way to see whom you are quoting. Gets kind of confusing when you don't remember whom (did I use that right?) said what... Cam, Ok - we've implemented this. Quotes should be a lot easier to follow now. You can use the following format to indicate whom the quote belongs to. [qu0te "username"]Text goes here [/qu0te] Clicking on the quote link at the top of a post will automatically quote the person who the post belongs to. The 0's in the example above should of course be o's. EXCELLENT!!!!!!!! Thanks good!
|
|
|
|
|
ctardi
Nov 25, 2006, 5:12 PM
Post #11 of 11
(3079 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 8, 2004
Posts: 1278
|
sangiro wrote: ctardi wrote: Not sure if this has been mentioned, but there is not a way to see whom you are quoting. Gets kind of confusing when you don't remember whom (did I use that right?) said what... Cam, Ok - we've implemented this. Quotes should be a lot easier to follow now. You can use the following format to indicate whom the quote belongs to. [qu0te "username"]Text goes here [/qu0te] Clicking on the quote link at the top of a post will automatically quote the person who the post belongs to. The 0's in the example above should of course be o's.
Looks good to me!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Come on, own up! 
