Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads:
Biners
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Gear Heads

Premier Sponsor:

 


climberslacker


Dec 8, 2006, 4:39 AM
Post #1 of 24 (1367 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 3, 2006
Posts: 94

Biners
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

K so i was wondering how many of what type of biners i need ( locking vs. non lockiing) for a typicl top-rope setup?

Im gonna take a class on anchor setups and would like to immediatl go home and practice making my anchoprs.


Partner tattooed_climber


Dec 8, 2006, 5:05 AM
Post #2 of 24 (1354 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 4838

Re: [climberslacker] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

either or......but when it comes to anchors, use lockers before non lockers (trad and alpine philosophy here)

technically for TR, youre less likely to take a 'fall' vs taking a whipper like with trad, so the likely hood of the rope/anchor backclipping a biner is far less...still, and especially at the master point (the biner that connects the rope the anchor) always use 2 locking and opposed biners



its youre "practicing" at home around the couch or something, any biner will do....still, if youre just starting out, buying 6 lockers first thing off the bat never hurts


greenketch


Dec 8, 2006, 5:54 PM
Post #3 of 24 (1262 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 501

Re: [climberslacker] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If your going to take a class start with about four and four. One would be hard pressed to create an equalized three piece anchor with less than eight biners. A few more would be nice and you can always use them later.

As to actually useing them use a locker anywhere that a failure would have severe consequences. if failure is not that bad a non-locker is fine. After the class go make up some anchors and then carefully analyze for what happens. You will probably decide you need to have something differant.

If you have any aspirations to leading you will need to learn the art of createing safe anchors out of whatever is left on your rack. By then you will have lots of biners to play with.


wanlessrm


Dec 8, 2006, 6:00 PM
Post #4 of 24 (1255 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2002
Posts: 333

Re: [greenketch] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Are you kidding? Eight biners? WTF


dbrayack


Dec 8, 2006, 6:09 PM
Post #5 of 24 (1246 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 1260

Re: [climberslacker] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I took a tope roping class a while ago.

We were taught to use webbing/static rope around trees and to use:

TWO NON-LOCKING OVAL biners opposite and oposed.

Be sure they are symmetrical so you do not get offset (does this make sense?) which makes the rope run weird.

A locker thrown in with a non locker isn't a bad idea, but the theory of two lockers is that the screw locks rub and can end up unlocking themselves.


drfelatio


Dec 8, 2006, 7:28 PM
Post #6 of 24 (1214 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 475

Re: [tattooed_climber] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

tattooed_climber wrote:
...at the master point (the biner that connects the rope the anchor) always use 2 locking and opposed biners

Noob question: Why TWO lockers? I assume we're worried about loading the gate and unclipping (hence the need for TWO opposite and opposed NON-lockers), but isn't that what using a locker is supposed to prevent? I'm not saying its wrong, necessarily. I mean, if you have them, by all means use them, but it just seems superfluous to me.

wanlessrm wrote:
Are you kidding? Eight biners? WTF

No doubt! You need at least four (At the most, five, keep reading...). One locker for each anchor and one locker (or maybe 2...see first quote) or two non-lockers for the power point.

If all you had were non-lockers, then, yeah, eight would be nice.


(This post was edited by drfelatio on Dec 8, 2006, 7:29 PM)


dbrayack


Dec 8, 2006, 7:31 PM
Post #7 of 24 (1209 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 1260

Re: [drfelatio] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

why lockers for the anchor point? Why not just girth hitch or tie around the tree? My top rope anchors only need two biners (non lockers)


greenketch


Dec 8, 2006, 8:07 PM
Post #8 of 24 (1182 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 501

Re: [wanlessrm] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wanlessrm wrote:
Are you kidding? Eight biners? WTF


We are talking about a class here. If I were setting up a textbook equalette off three pieces, it could be done with four standard and one locker. (one at each piece of pro and two at the master point). It is true that two standard could be used at the master point as well. But again I must state that we are discussing a class. If I was at a class and they only covered perfect placements and locations where there are bomber trees positioned just so (in which case webbing and two biners is all you need) I would ask for a refund. In my book a class is to become acquainted with some of the "what if's" and "how to's". In that setting having eight biners to use and become profficient with is not terribly unreasonable.

I think I will stand by my recomend for this one. Now if you are truelly poor and can't afford it, less is fine, but maybe one needs to reexamine there choice of recreation.


wanlessrm


Dec 8, 2006, 8:27 PM
Post #9 of 24 (1168 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2002
Posts: 333

Re: [greenketch] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This is a new person were talking about and they will only be building anchors in a prime location. On a multipitch route 16 beaners at the belays. Who would carry that? If I was your climbing partner I would think your nuts with 8.
With more experience I think you'll soon change you mind!


percious


Dec 8, 2006, 8:28 PM
Post #10 of 24 (1167 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2005
Posts: 140

Re: [climberslacker] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Some suggestions are good here. I assume you will not be building artificial anchors, because otherwise you would be asking about stoppers and cams... That being said, you will need at least two lockers for the powerpoint. A couple of extra lockers are good for friction-wrapping trees, and if you use a cordolette or a sling on a tree.

I would not recommend girth-hitching a tree because it is the least-strong way to set up a sling, instead simply loop the tree and attach your static line to the sling at the two loops with two opposite and apposed carabiners. (hard to describe). While it is not redundant, it has the most strength, and you will need more than one anchor point anyway which will give you your redundancy.

Make sure you get two carabiners for your power point that have large gate openings like BD pearabiners or OP Jakes. Some people I know use steelies for the power point because they will last a lot longer. They tend to take a significant amount of abuse while hanging over the edge of the cliff, especially on routes that are hang-doggers. Also consider getting key-lock carabiners because they tend to hang up less when you are setting/breaking down stuff. Almost all of my locking carabiners are key-lock at this point.

After all that how many do you need for one setup?

2 - (large) Power Point lockers
2-4 - Other lockers
1 - carabiner for belay device
1 - carabiner for autoblock

Also consider picking up an extra single length sling to extend your belay device on rappel. If you don't know what an autoblock is then ask your instructor.

Have a great class!

-percious


dbrayack


Dec 8, 2006, 8:37 PM
Post #11 of 24 (1157 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 1260

Re: [percious] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'd just like to note that everything here so far is sound, we're just bickering about efficiency etc.

Really, its all pretty straight forward. I try to be a minimalist (least amount of links in the system)

While others prefer to ensure maximum strength and least chance of failure (not girth hitching because of strength loss, locking biners etc)


drfelatio


Dec 8, 2006, 8:54 PM
Post #12 of 24 (1137 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 475

Re: [dbrayack] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dbrayack wrote:
why lockers for the anchor point? Why not just girth hitch or tie around the tree? My top rope anchors only need two biners (non lockers)

Uhm...cause there aren't always trees at the anchor?

greenketch wrote:
We are talking about a class here. If I were setting up a textbook equalette off three pieces, it could be done with four standard and one locker. (one at each piece of pro and two at the master point).

We must be reading different textbooks. Mine tells me a bomber, 3-piece anchor includes three lockers -- one at each piece of pro -- and two non-lockers for the master point (although I believe one locker could be used instead...see previous post). Where are you putting your locker? At the master point? If so, I just don't understand why you would mix a locker with a non-locker. In that situation, I would think that the non-locker would be superfluous.

greenketch wrote:
It is true that two standard could be used at the master point as well. But again I must state that we are discussing a class. If I was at a class and they only covered perfect placements and locations where there are bomber trees positioned just so (in which case webbing and two biners is all you need) I would ask for a refund. In my book a class is to become acquainted with some of the "what if's" and "how to's".

Agreed.

greenketch wrote:
In that setting having eight biners to use and become profficient with is not terribly unreasonable.

Not at all...if that was all you had. But I think the greater lesson here is that if you don't have a locking biner, then two non-lockers whose gates are opposite and opposed can be used instead. The point I'm trying to make is why use eight non-lockers when you can use four lockers?

greenketch wrote:
I think I will stand by my recomend for this one. Now if you are truelly poor and can't afford it, less is fine, but maybe one needs to reexamine there choice of recreation.

Fair enough, but while you fiddle with your eight non-lockers, I'm gonna carry half that number (and less weight too) in lockers!


drfelatio


Dec 8, 2006, 9:00 PM
Post #13 of 24 (1130 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 475

Re: [percious] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

percious wrote:
After all that how many do you need for one setup?

2 - (large) Power Point lockers
2-4 - Other lockers
1 - carabiner for belay device
1 - carabiner for autoblock

Clarification: 1 - LOCKER for belay device


coastal_climber


Dec 8, 2006, 9:06 PM
Post #14 of 24 (1124 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 2542

Re: [drfelatio] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

2 lockers, 2 non lockers, 2 pieces of webbing. Length of webbing pending on distance from bolts to endge of climb.


devils_advocate


Dec 8, 2006, 10:13 PM
Post #15 of 24 (1082 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2006
Posts: 1823

Re: [coastal_climber] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

what's a locker?


wanlessrm


Dec 8, 2006, 10:28 PM
Post #16 of 24 (1070 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2002
Posts: 333

Re: [devils_advocate] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Its something you keep your clothes in at the gym!Wink


percious


Dec 8, 2006, 10:32 PM
Post #17 of 24 (1069 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2005
Posts: 140

Re: [drfelatio] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

yes,
locker for belay device, and locker for auto-block. Thanks for the clarification.

-percious


tradrenn


Dec 9, 2006, 1:53 AM
Post #18 of 24 (1029 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 16, 2005
Posts: 2990

Re: [climberslacker] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

6 Locking biners max.


pjdf


Dec 9, 2006, 7:41 AM
Post #19 of 24 (1000 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 23, 2006
Posts: 307

Re: [percious] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

percious wrote:
I would not recommend girth-hitching a tree because it is the least-strong way to set up a sling, instead simply loop the tree and attach your static line to the sling at the two loops with two opposite and apposed carabiners. (hard to describe). While it is not redundant, it has the most strength, and you will need more than one anchor point anyway which will give you your redundancy.

While I understand your concern about girth hitches, it is important to note that if you don't have enough sling to extend significantly away from the tree, you may end up with a tri-axial loading of the carabiners, which is also a big problem.

Also, I'd like to second dbrayack's comment about using two lockers together for a power point. I have seen a rope unlock a single locker, and two together will unlock each other if opposite but not opposed (or opposed but not opposite--I'm not certain which term refers to which degree of freedom).


jumpingrock


Dec 10, 2006, 5:38 AM
Post #20 of 24 (930 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 5692

Re: [pjdf] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I use however many lockers I have when I get to the lockers. This depends on how many I remembered to pack/carried up the climb. Learn to improvise and when a non-locker is "good-enough".

The only thing I like to do if I know that I am going to be setting up TR's is bring along one of the DMM auto-locking biners for the power point. I like the knowledge that once that clicks in place it will never open unless I will it to.


percious


Dec 11, 2006, 2:19 PM
Post #21 of 24 (865 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2005
Posts: 140

Re: [jumpingrock] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I am guessing you are speaking about the DMM "locksafe" carabiners. They are a two-function carabiner which should reduce the likelihood of the carabiner opening inadvertently. I would not use a single-function auto-locking carabiner at the power point because the gate may be opened inadvertently. Personally, I think Petzls Ball-lock carabiners are better for a power point carabiner, but to be truthful, I usually use simple lockers.

-percious


hex


Dec 11, 2006, 2:36 PM
Post #22 of 24 (860 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 7, 2003
Posts: 110

Re: [climberslacker] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

People often add a second karabiner to the powerpoint not for strength but to reduce the curve the rope has to run around and thus reduce the friction making the rope easier to belay with.... So could have 1 locker + 1 non locker, 2 lockers or 2 non lockers... always opposite and oppose the krabs and try and use ones that are similar size and shape.


drfelatio


Dec 15, 2006, 1:24 AM
Post #23 of 24 (776 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 475

Re: [hex] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've heard a lot of good arguments for using two biners -- lockers or non-lockers -- for the powerpoint. This was the information that I was wanting to hear so thank you!

But back to the OP's original question: How many and what type biners are needed for a typical top-rope setup?

As dbrayack pointed out, if there are plenty of stout trees/boulders that you can throw a sling around you will need at least two (2) non-lockers (for the powerpoint).

If you need to clip your anchor into something, say, bolt hangers, then you will need at least five (5) biners:

** Three lockers, one for each anchor point

** Two opposite and opposed lockers or non-lockers or a combination of the two for the powerpoint

Having more than these minimum amounts certainly doesn't hurt, but, except in the case of substituting two non-lockers for one locker, they probably aren't necessary.


devils_advocate


Dec 15, 2006, 5:15 PM
Post #24 of 24 (730 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2006
Posts: 1823

Re: [drfelatio] Biners [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

drfelatio wrote:
But back to the OP's original question: How many and what type biners are needed for a typical top-rope setup?

6... no wait, 4... crap, no 8. Yeah that’s it, 8. 7?

I find it amazing how often this question comes up. I find it hard to believe that anyone with enough understanding of what needs to go into a solid anchor actually needs to ask this question. If you have what it takes, and it really doesn’t take much, you should be able to visualize a redundant, equalized TR anchor in your head. You should be able to visualize different scenarios that might require more or less gear.

If you need to ask this question, please don’t build anchors without assistance.


Forums : Climbing Information : Gear Heads

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook