|
uptick
Nov 23, 2007, 8:19 PM
Post #1 of 4
(1691 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 30, 2006
Posts: 78
|
|
|
|
|
|
wilddoc
Nov 24, 2007, 10:46 PM
Post #2 of 4
(1631 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2006
Posts: 15
|
I'll be in the market for a new camera body soon. What's your reasons for preferring the 200 over the 300?
|
|
|
|
|
uptick
Nov 25, 2007, 6:03 AM
Post #3 of 4
(1588 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 30, 2006
Posts: 78
|
1) I'm too much of a dumbass to make the 300 sing.
or really...
2) The 200 is as much of a camera as I need. The 300 is nice but I probably would have stayed with my D70s if the fps was higher. Thought it would suffice at first but after attempting to shoot some sports, 3 really drags.
Put my name in the hat when the 300's werIn reply to: e first announced and figured I'd have time to evaluate the body over the ensuing months. I did...
|
|
|
|
|
piton
Nov 28, 2007, 1:55 PM
Post #4 of 4
(1507 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 11, 2002
Posts: 1034
|
lots of debate about how much better one is over the other. imo the 300 isn't worth the upgrade from a 200.
|
|
|
|
|
|
