|
bart
Oct 15, 2001, 1:06 PM
Post #1 of 6
(1982 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 5, 2001
Posts: 278
|
I think the headings of the grade chart are wrong. It's not a disaster, but it would be handy if they were right. I think each heading refers to the next column (or the other way round).
|
|
|
|
|
fiend
Oct 15, 2001, 6:24 PM
Post #2 of 6
(1982 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669
|
You're right, only problem is, which grade doesn't fit!
we've got seven headings, but only six grade types.
|
|
|
|
|
fiend
Oct 15, 2001, 6:44 PM
Post #3 of 6
(1982 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669
|
fixededed.
|
|
|
|
|
rck_climber
Oct 15, 2001, 7:34 PM
Post #4 of 6
(1982 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2001
Posts: 1010
|
You DA MAN, Mark!!
|
|
|
|
|
bart
Oct 16, 2001, 7:06 AM
Post #5 of 6
(1982 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 5, 2001
Posts: 278
|
Excellent... (here should stay a picture of Mr Burns)
Thanx
|
|
|
|
|
rck_climber
Oct 16, 2001, 4:49 PM
Post #6 of 6
(1982 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2001
Posts: 1010
|
Now this might be a silly point, but what about replacing the "S" for type (which I assume stands for Sport) with either "S/T" (for Sport/Trad) or "F" (for Free).
It might lead some newer climbers to believe that there is a seperate rating system for Trad, etc. that was left off.
Just a thought.
Mick
|
|
|
|
|
|
