Forums: Climbing Information: General:
New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All


karlbaba


Apr 11, 2008, 3:15 AM
Post #1 of 132 (8061 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 10, 2002
Posts: 1159

New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sean Jones and Crew put up a new almost all free route on the South Face of Half Dome. Story is here

http://www.rockandice.com/...7&type=exclusive

Many have cried fowl because rap bolting was used in the upper slab portions of the route when the Fa party was uncertain if it would go and couldn't drill from stances or hooks (and didn't want to put up a death route)

What do you think. Tactics justified or bad style (or both)

Peace

Karl


tolman_paul


Apr 11, 2008, 3:23 AM
Post #2 of 132 (8050 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2005
Posts: 385

Re: [karlbaba] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Like this hasn't been discussed to death. And you end your post with peace? Wouldn't a more apropriate salutation be, incoming.


karlbaba


Apr 11, 2008, 3:28 AM
Post #3 of 132 (8045 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 10, 2002
Posts: 1159

Re: [tolman_paul] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Actually Paul, there's been no mention of it at all on Rockclimbing.com. I'm curious what different perspectives different crowds have.

Whether it's peaceful or not depends on the players. It's an important discussion to have and nobody's worse for the wear so far.

Peace

Karl


moose_droppings


Apr 11, 2008, 3:38 AM
Post #4 of 132 (8024 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [karlbaba] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think most people that do care about it have probably been keeping tabs on it here.
Just a guess.

http://www.supertopo.com/...html?topic_id=566859


Partner happiegrrrl


Apr 11, 2008, 3:57 AM
Post #5 of 132 (7999 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [moose_droppings] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wow....Karl's being called a troll. For posting about a probable landmark route on a climbing site. Because it's already been on another one. Didn't know topics for the various forums were proprietary.

I know there are plenty of people who don't post on ST, though they do lurk. Perhaps they might be more apt to post here, or on MP or SP....

But good on you, Karl, if your post was an intended troll, at least..... It's off to a fine start!


curt


Apr 11, 2008, 4:27 AM
Post #6 of 132 (7974 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [karlbaba] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karlbaba wrote:
Sean Jones and Crew put up a new almost all free route on the South Face of Half Dome. Story is here

http://www.rockandice.com/...7&type=exclusive

Many have cried fowl because rap bolting was used in the upper slab portions of the route when the Fa party was uncertain if it would go and couldn't drill from stances or hooks (and didn't want to put up a death route)

What do you think. Tactics justified or bad style (or both)

Peace

Karl

Personally, I cry "foul." Fowl is OK too, though.

Curt


marc801


Apr 11, 2008, 4:38 AM
Post #7 of 132 (7959 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [happiegrrrl] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
Didn't know topics for the various forums were proprietary.

I know there are plenty of people who don't post on ST, though they do lurk. Perhaps they might be more apt to post here, or on MP or SP....
With over 1200 posts and counting on ST, what more could anyone possibly say?


karlbaba


Apr 11, 2008, 4:51 AM
Post #8 of 132 (7946 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 10, 2002
Posts: 1159

Re: [marc801] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've noticed from times I've posted the same question on this forum and then on Supertopo, that I've received very different responses. I'm trying to get a wider perspective on where the climbing community is at.

It's kinda like this: Some of my California friends were just dumbfounded that Bush got (sort-of) re-elected. They are in touch with like-minded people so they didn't get that there are plenty of folks who think different.

So I want to know what this forum thinks. I think on the supertopo forum there were probably folks who didn't feel like weighing in for or against the heavyweights on both sides of the coin. It might have been better if folks didn't read those comments before saying what they think here, but perhaps by doing so they'd be better informed of the issues.

Peace

karl


moose_droppings


Apr 11, 2008, 4:52 AM
Post #9 of 132 (7945 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [happiegrrrl] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Thats quite a leap to say that I'm calling troll because I pointed out a guess as to why it hasn't been being dicussed here yet.

Aren't many topics there that catch my eye, but this one did and I lurked my way through it since I'm not registered there.
Can't remember whos words were to the effect of, 'climbers better iron this one out before it invites the government to do so'. This BS of my bolt is OK but yours isn't is pretty petty from my viewpoint. No one person owns public rock. Get over it before someone else steps in and settles it in a way that neither side will like.

Reply to karls obove post edit:
Yes, I think it would help others to catch up to whats already been pointed out. Pretty sure most already have their opinion formed on style and etheics (I'd hope) without jumping fence.


(This post was edited by moose_droppings on Apr 11, 2008, 4:57 AM)


quiteatingmysteak


Apr 11, 2008, 4:53 AM
Post #10 of 132 (7943 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [karlbaba] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karlbaba wrote:
I've noticed from times I've posted the same question on this forum and then on Supertopo, that I've received very different responses. I'm trying to get a wider perspective on where the climbing community is at.

It's kinda like this: Some of my California friends were just dumbfounded that Bush got (sort-of) re-elected. They are in touch with like-minded people so they didn't get that there are plenty of folks who think different.

So I want to know what this forum thinks. I think on the supertopo forum there were probably folks who didn't feel like weighing in for or against the heavyweights on both sides of the coin. It might have been better if folks didn't read those comments before saying what they think here, but perhaps by doing so they'd be better informed of the issues.

Peace

karl

I agree with Karl, I would like to see how this flies on RC.com. RC seems to be a more liberal climbing discussion arena, and a lot of people don't post on the taco.


Probably it will be tragic.


-GDavis


quiteatingmysteak


Apr 11, 2008, 4:55 AM
Post #11 of 132 (7941 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Jesus karl I just saw some of your work... holy Sh!t. Them's some good photos, man. I saw that island and thought it was some background of a video game.... take me along next time K?

-GDavis


potreroed


Apr 11, 2008, 5:00 AM
Post #12 of 132 (7935 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 30, 2001
Posts: 1454

Re: [karlbaba] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Bolts on an otherwise unprotectable slab--what a concept!!! With the amount of work involved, and the general bottom-feeding nature of the majority of climbers, I don't think we have to worry about the whole wall being grid-bolted. While I'm not a big fan of rap-bolting I say they did it right.


curt


Apr 11, 2008, 5:10 AM
Post #13 of 132 (7922 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [karlbaba] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karlbaba wrote:
...I think on the supertopo forum there were probably folks who didn't feel like weighing in for or against the heavyweights on both sides of the coin.

Peace

karl

Are you implying that more fat people post over there?

Curt


curt


Apr 11, 2008, 5:12 AM
Post #14 of 132 (7919 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [potreroed] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

potreroed wrote:
Bolts on an otherwise unprotectable slab--what a concept!!! With the amount of work involved, and the general bottom-feeding nature of the majority of climbers, I don't think we have to worry about the whole wall being grid-bolted. While I'm not a big fan of rap-bolting I say they did it right.

Well, not surprisingly, I disagree.

Curt


quiteatingmysteak


Apr 11, 2008, 5:17 AM
Post #15 of 132 (7914 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [curt] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
potreroed wrote:
Bolts on an otherwise unprotectable slab--what a concept!!! With the amount of work involved, and the general bottom-feeding nature of the majority of climbers, I don't think we have to worry about the whole wall being grid-bolted. While I'm not a big fan of rap-bolting I say they did it right.

Well, not surprisingly, I disagree.

Curt


1200 posts later on Supertopo.

This is about as far as we have come.

Smile


quiteatingmysteak


Apr 11, 2008, 5:18 AM
Post #16 of 132 (7908 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In all honesty I think a lot of climbers need to understand where the traditional camp is coming from. Not necessarily to agree with, but to grasp the concepts; routes start at the ground and the game is adventure, not difficulty. Sometimes this seems lost in the endless pursuant of VHard.


shockabuku


Apr 11, 2008, 5:36 AM
Post #17 of 132 (7878 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

quiteatingmysteak wrote:
In all honesty I think a lot of climbers need to understand where the traditional camp is coming from. ... and the game is...

Was that really your point.

Funny (ironic), it's similar to the thread on the value of climbing. If it's a game, then I can play whatever variation of the game I want and it's none of your business (but that's not quite true when people are calling out for attention to what they've done, is it?). It's all relative. Ethics are an argument for the locals. I guess in the age of the internet nothing is quite as local as it used to be.


curt


Apr 11, 2008, 5:51 AM
Post #18 of 132 (7870 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [shockabuku] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
quiteatingmysteak wrote:
In all honesty I think a lot of climbers need to understand where the traditional camp is coming from. ... and the game is...

Was that really your point.

Funny (ironic), it's similar to the thread on the value of climbing. If it's a game, then I can play whatever variation of the game I want and it's none of your business...

Similarly, when you go bowling, remember to ask the nice man behind the desk to put the bumper guards up on your lane. Just please don't misrepresent to anyone that you actually did go bowling.

Curt


shockabuku


Apr 11, 2008, 5:56 AM
Post #19 of 132 (7864 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [curt] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
quiteatingmysteak wrote:
In all honesty I think a lot of climbers need to understand where the traditional camp is coming from. ... and the game is...

Was that really your point.

Funny (ironic), it's similar to the thread on the value of climbing. If it's a game, then I can play whatever variation of the game I want and it's none of your business...

Similarly, when you go bowling, remember to ask the nice man behind the desk to put the bumper guards up on your lane. Just please don't misrepresent to anyone that you actually did go bowling.

Curt

I always liked the saying:

The devil is in the details.

I was never sure if that was the Devil proper or just the devil in general however.

I used to take risks and keep the bumpers down but nowadays I can't even motivate myself to get out there anymore. Maybe it's too safe an environment nowadays, you know with all the anti-smoking laws and anti-drunk driving and eat healthy shit going on these days.


jaybro


Apr 11, 2008, 7:46 AM
Post #20 of 132 (7823 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 2, 2005
Posts: 441

Re: [karlbaba] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hmm, seems like no one is really into climbing related material, here...

was that a troll?


Partner xtrmecat


Apr 11, 2008, 2:18 PM
Post #21 of 132 (7724 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 548

Re: [karlbaba] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

  Karl, I'll weigh in on this again. Once on ST and again here. I also believe that Yosemite locals(ethics) have always been ground up and on the leading edge of the sport. I am trying hard to climb this way, and would never consider rap bolting as an option to putting up a route.
I also understand the whole slab,unprotectable argument, and although not being able to climb at this level, think that it should have been left for future climbing that can be done in this style and ethics.
Also, anytime the people in controversy are using media or money to their gain then I am totally against it. DP, this route, professionally guiding(whether on the river or rock). These people should be held to a slightly higher standard being "professionals" so to speak. It is a finite resource and belongs to all, not just those seeking money or fame. If it can be climbed in the prevailing style(bottom up, drilling on lead) then go baby go.
If not it is not a plum to be plucked by you. As a wise man stated on this topic, that I was not good enough should be the attitude, and just walk on by. Someone, some day will either do it, or not. But the rest of us (who the climb really belongs to) do not get raped of the opportunity to send it the right way.
I vacation there roughly every other year and also climb in some areas that have differing ethics. I believe it would be wrong to adopt my home crags bolting ethics on my vacation crags stone.
Trad all the way, sport climbing is neither.
Bob

Flame retardant suit at the ready.

Oh yeah, Hi Karl.


(This post was edited by xtrmecat on Apr 11, 2008, 2:23 PM)


Partner j_ung


Apr 11, 2008, 2:43 PM
Post #22 of 132 (7691 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [xtrmecat] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Bearing in mind that I'm not a local, have never even been there, and hence, don't have an amoeba in the petri dish, let alone a dog in the fight, I think it was poorer style than was appropriate for the crag. That said, do I even care? Nawp. If you look back in time at all the style and ethic-based nonsense that has occurred from time to time in Yosemite, it's a tip-toe through the ego field of melodrama. This is just more of the same.


Truck


Apr 11, 2008, 3:35 PM
Post #23 of 132 (7631 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2007
Posts: 67

Re: [j_ung] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
If you look back in time at all the style and ethic-based nonsense that has occurred from time to time in Yosemite, it's a tip-toe through the ego field of melodrama. This is just more of the same.

Nuff said right there. We just saved 1200 posts.

Truck


quiteatingmysteak


Apr 11, 2008, 4:19 PM
Post #24 of 132 (7571 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [shockabuku] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
quiteatingmysteak wrote:
In all honesty I think a lot of climbers need to understand where the traditional camp is coming from. ... and the game is...

Was that really your point.

Funny (ironic), it's similar to the thread on the value of climbing. If it's a game, then I can play whatever variation of the game I want and it's none of your business (but that's not quite true when people are calling out for attention to what they've done, is it?). It's all relative. Ethics are an argument for the locals. I guess in the age of the internet nothing is quite as local as it used to be.


As Hemingway said, the only real games are bullfighting, boxing and mountain climbing Wink

But then again Hemingway was an ass.

I don't think calling it a 'game' takes away from its seriousness, heritage or construct. I for SURE would call golf a game (also a huge waste of time, though fun) yet would hardly expect those on the PGA tour to call mulligans. Similarly Football is a game -- a coach just got fined $750,000.000. Some games have high stakes.


deltav


Apr 11, 2008, 4:47 PM
Post #25 of 132 (7521 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 597

Re: [marc801] New Route on Half Dome. Fine route or Ethics Violation [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
happiegrrrl wrote:
Didn't know topics for the various forums were proprietary.

I know there are plenty of people who don't post on ST, though they do lurk. Perhaps they might be more apt to post here, or on MP or SP....
With over 1200 posts and counting on ST, what more could anyone possibly say?

I don't read ST. Thanks for bringing it up Karl

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook