|
captromalley
Sep 14, 2008, 3:30 PM
Post #1 of 10
(3089 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2008
Posts: 47
|
So I'll start of by letting you all know what I need. I need a picture of a muscle bound preferably shirtless male climber and a semi scantily clad fit strong woman climber. That would sound easy enough but I have tried typing many many things in "the google" (I don't recommend googling shirtless sexy climber @ work) with very poor results. The reason I need this, is the gym I work at wants to post up a few photos of the physical results of a good climbing regiment. Also they would be images we would possibly want to blow up a bit so the quality has to be decent. Any ideas? Cover of rock and ice, April issue with Puigblanque comes to mind.
|
|
|
|
|
jdefazio
Sep 14, 2008, 3:56 PM
Post #2 of 10
(3075 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 228
|
Close Enough?
|
|
|
|
|
mushroomsamba
Sep 14, 2008, 4:38 PM
Post #3 of 10
(3056 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 24, 2006
Posts: 389
|
jdefazio wrote: Close Enough? [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/393601-work-n525020742_1775402_4382.jpg[/image] quality
|
|
|
|
|
crotch
Sep 14, 2008, 4:42 PM
Post #4 of 10
(3053 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: 1277
|
Of course you will be compensating the photographer for commercial use of the image, right?
(This post was edited by crotch on Sep 14, 2008, 5:10 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
captromalley
Sep 14, 2008, 5:41 PM
Post #5 of 10
(3017 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2008
Posts: 47
|
Its great!!! The only problem would be the resolution. I feel that when we blow that up to about 3 feet by 12 some very important details my begin to get a little "fuzzy". What else we got? And also, if anyone has any actual help, that would be nice too.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 14, 2008, 6:54 PM
Post #6 of 10
(2991 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
You gunna ask me first before you start putting up naked photos of me all over the shop???
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 14, 2008, 11:15 PM
Post #8 of 10
(2929 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Oh noez!
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
Sep 14, 2008, 11:37 PM
Post #9 of 10
(2918 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
The extreme of the climber physique is not really all that attractive with giant shoulders and lats on top of chicken legs and Popeye forearms. The caveman-hunch/spoon-chest or the sports bra lat-muffin-top is not exactly a vision of beauty.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 14, 2008, 11:54 PM
Post #10 of 10
(2898 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Not attractive? NOT ATTRACTIVE? HOW IS THIS NOT ATTRACTIVE???
|
|
|
|
|
|