|
hugepedro
Apr 28, 2010, 6:09 PM
Post #126 of 146
(3389 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
cracklover wrote: Oh wait, that's right, I was just saving weight by leaving behind an entire 60 meters (200 feet? Dingus, please do the conversion for me) of rope! Beat that HugePedro! G 
Excellent form, my man. Excellent. You have my esteem. I'll save a few honeys for you.
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Apr 28, 2010, 6:48 PM
Post #127 of 146
(3367 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
hugepedro wrote: cracklover wrote: Oh wait, that's right, I was just saving weight by leaving behind an entire 60 meters (200 feet? Dingus, please do the conversion for me) of rope! Beat that HugePedro! G Excellent form, my man. Excellent. You have my esteem. I'll save a few honeys for you.
SIXTY!
DMT
|
|
|
|
|
hugepedro
Apr 28, 2010, 6:52 PM
Post #128 of 146
(3365 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
dingus wrote: hugepedro wrote: cracklover wrote: Oh wait, that's right, I was just saving weight by leaving behind an entire 60 meters (200 feet? Dingus, please do the conversion for me) of rope! Beat that HugePedro! G Excellent form, my man. Excellent. You have my esteem. I'll save a few honeys for you. SIXTY! DMT
Sixty honeys? No problem. That is a mere few out of the numbers of honeys I'm gettin.
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Apr 28, 2010, 6:58 PM
Post #129 of 146
(3359 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
And all of em named Rosey!
What a coincidence.
DMT
|
|
|
|
|
edge
Apr 28, 2010, 7:05 PM
Post #130 of 146
(3351 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120
|
dingus wrote: And all of em named Rosey! What a coincidence. DMT
Ha!
Last name?
|
|
|
|
|
hugepedro
Apr 28, 2010, 7:17 PM
Post #131 of 146
(3343 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
She prefers to be called Tyfanni.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Apr 28, 2010, 8:05 PM
Post #132 of 146
(3324 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
hugepedro wrote: dingus wrote: hugepedro wrote: cracklover wrote: Oh wait, that's right, I was just saving weight by leaving behind an entire 60 meters (200 feet? Dingus, please do the conversion for me) of rope! Beat that HugePedro! G Excellent form, my man. Excellent. You have my esteem. I'll save a few honeys for you. SIXTY! DMT Sixty honeys? No problem. That is a mere few out of the numbers of honeys I'm gettin.
Sixty honeys? Hmm... I thought he was answering my conversion conundrum - sixty feet. Although sixty feet = sixty meters doesn't make all that much sense either. Oh well.
Oh, and back on topic: "safety hitch" bwahahahaha! What a perfectly rc.com name for clipping in with a daisy.
G
|
|
|
|
|
hugepedro
Apr 28, 2010, 8:17 PM
Post #133 of 146
(3314 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
cracklover wrote: Sixty honeys? Hmm... I thought he was answering my conversion conundrum
He prolly was, but, I see no reason not to bring up all my honeys anyway. Just in case you guys forgot.
|
|
|
|
|
wallwombat
Apr 28, 2010, 9:18 PM
Post #134 of 146
(3306 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 17, 2003
Posts: 727
|
hugepedro wrote: wallwombat wrote: That was 45 minutes of my life that I will NEVER get back.  Shutup, n00b!!!!11
Is this where I'm supposed to go,
noob? YOU CALLED ME A NOOB?
My scrotum has been climbing longer than you......blah, blah, blah....... I'm so experienced........blah, blah, blah....I was climbing blah, blah, blah before you were blah, blah....I used to own a pair of Scarpa Superatz....blah blah blah......I tie in at belays with my wee wee....blah, blah, blah....
....Well, I can't be bothered. 
(This post was edited by wallwombat on Apr 28, 2010, 9:20 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
hugepedro
Apr 28, 2010, 9:52 PM
Post #135 of 146
(3290 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
I might borrow that scrotum line from time to time. Hope you don't mind.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Apr 29, 2010, 11:40 AM
Post #136 of 146
(3260 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Well, if you have no means to tie into the anchor, other than the rope, then you are also carrying something that serves only a single, specialized purpose - that 4-8 feet of rope (which is way heavier than my rig). huh? if you and I climb the same pitch, and I tie in with the rope, and you tie in with a PAS, then how is it that I'm carrying more? Cause, like, this isn't making any sense. Or, T0 Because Pedro is so bad at making sense, I will try to explain. His point, at least I think, is that his system allows him to use twin ropes instead of bringing up a second rope for rappels, thus saving weight. However, I may be completely mistaken.
I climb with doubles.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Apr 29, 2010, 11:47 AM
Post #137 of 146
(3258 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
hugepedro wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Well, if you have no means to tie into the anchor, other than the rope, then you are also carrying something that serves only a single, specialized purpose - that 4-8 feet of rope (which is way heavier than my rig). huh? if you and I climb the same pitch, and I tie in with the rope, and you tie in with a PAS, then how is it that I'm carrying more? Cause, like, this isn't making any sense. Or, T0 Well we aren’t climbing the same pitches. I’m climbing longer ones than you because of the constraints of your system. I’m pwning you and gettin all the honeys. Again, someone was mocking my degree of “weight naziness” because I carry an “extra” 3 ounces. This was a hypothetical comparison to demonstrate that my system is actually lighter on a weight per useful length of rope basis (and probably lighter overall if they are doing routes that require full length rappels and aren’t using twins or a skinnier rap cord). Try re-reading some of the posts, and if you still don’t get it then I probably can’t help you.
Oh, I read them just fine thanks. [rolls eyes]
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Apr 29, 2010, 11:52 AM
Post #138 of 146
(3255 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Well, if you have no means to tie into the anchor, other than the rope, then you are also carrying something that serves only a single, specialized purpose - that 4-8 feet of rope (which is way heavier than my rig). huh? if you and I climb the same pitch, and I tie in with the rope, and you tie in with a PAS, then how is it that I'm carrying more? Cause, like, this isn't making any sense. Or, T0 Because Pedro is so bad at making sense, I will try to explain. His point, at least I think, is that his system allows him to use twin ropes instead of bringing up a second rope for rappels, thus saving weight. However, I may be completely mistaken. I climb with doubles.
Pedro thinks it is easier with his purcells.
(This post was edited by johnwesely on Apr 29, 2010, 11:52 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Apr 29, 2010, 12:25 PM
Post #139 of 146
(3234 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Well, if you have no means to tie into the anchor, other than the rope, then you are also carrying something that serves only a single, specialized purpose - that 4-8 feet of rope (which is way heavier than my rig). huh? if you and I climb the same pitch, and I tie in with the rope, and you tie in with a PAS, then how is it that I'm carrying more? Cause, like, this isn't making any sense. Or, T0 Because Pedro is so bad at making sense, I will try to explain. His point, at least I think, is that his system allows him to use twin ropes instead of bringing up a second rope for rappels, thus saving weight. However, I may be completely mistaken. I climb with doubles. Pedro thinks it is easier with his purcells.
actually, I think he's saying he jugs as the second.
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Apr 29, 2010, 12:43 PM
Post #140 of 146
(3229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Well, if you have no means to tie into the anchor, other than the rope, then you are also carrying something that serves only a single, specialized purpose - that 4-8 feet of rope (which is way heavier than my rig). huh? if you and I climb the same pitch, and I tie in with the rope, and you tie in with a PAS, then how is it that I'm carrying more? Cause, like, this isn't making any sense. Or, T0 Because Pedro is so bad at making sense, I will try to explain. His point, at least I think, is that his system allows him to use twin ropes instead of bringing up a second rope for rappels, thus saving weight. However, I may be completely mistaken. I climb with doubles. Pedro thinks it is easier with his purcells. actually, I think he's saying he jugs as the second.
Whatever helps him get the honeys.
|
|
|
|
|
hugepedro
Apr 29, 2010, 3:44 PM
Post #141 of 146
(3204 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Well, if you have no means to tie into the anchor, other than the rope, then you are also carrying something that serves only a single, specialized purpose - that 4-8 feet of rope (which is way heavier than my rig). huh? if you and I climb the same pitch, and I tie in with the rope, and you tie in with a PAS, then how is it that I'm carrying more? Cause, like, this isn't making any sense. Or, T0 Because Pedro is so bad at making sense, I will try to explain. His point, at least I think, is that his system allows him to use twin ropes instead of bringing up a second rope for rappels, thus saving weight. However, I may be completely mistaken. I climb with doubles.
I've come to the considered opinion that you are a dumbass.
|
|
|
|
|
hugepedro
Apr 29, 2010, 3:50 PM
Post #142 of 146
(3199 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
johnwesely wrote: Whatever helps him get the honeys.
Now you're learning.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Apr 29, 2010, 3:52 PM
Post #143 of 146
(3196 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
hugepedro wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Well, if you have no means to tie into the anchor, other than the rope, then you are also carrying something that serves only a single, specialized purpose - that 4-8 feet of rope (which is way heavier than my rig). huh? if you and I climb the same pitch, and I tie in with the rope, and you tie in with a PAS, then how is it that I'm carrying more? Cause, like, this isn't making any sense. Or, T0 Because Pedro is so bad at making sense, I will try to explain. His point, at least I think, is that his system allows him to use twin ropes instead of bringing up a second rope for rappels, thus saving weight. However, I may be completely mistaken. I climb with doubles. I've come to the considered opinion that you are a dumbass.
that's all right, you were a little slow in making the assumption mutual.
|
|
|
|
|
hugepedro
Apr 29, 2010, 4:01 PM
Post #144 of 146
(3189 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Well, if you have no means to tie into the anchor, other than the rope, then you are also carrying something that serves only a single, specialized purpose - that 4-8 feet of rope (which is way heavier than my rig). huh? if you and I climb the same pitch, and I tie in with the rope, and you tie in with a PAS, then how is it that I'm carrying more? Cause, like, this isn't making any sense. Or, T0 Because Pedro is so bad at making sense, I will try to explain. His point, at least I think, is that his system allows him to use twin ropes instead of bringing up a second rope for rappels, thus saving weight. However, I may be completely mistaken. I climb with doubles. I've come to the considered opinion that you are a dumbass. that's all right, you were a little slow in making the assumption mutual.
Dude, how do you even have time to post? Aren't you getting behind on your rope flaking?
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Apr 29, 2010, 4:13 PM
Post #145 of 146
(3181 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
hugepedro wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Well, if you have no means to tie into the anchor, other than the rope, then you are also carrying something that serves only a single, specialized purpose - that 4-8 feet of rope (which is way heavier than my rig). huh? if you and I climb the same pitch, and I tie in with the rope, and you tie in with a PAS, then how is it that I'm carrying more? Cause, like, this isn't making any sense. Or, T0 Because Pedro is so bad at making sense, I will try to explain. His point, at least I think, is that his system allows him to use twin ropes instead of bringing up a second rope for rappels, thus saving weight. However, I may be completely mistaken. I climb with doubles. I've come to the considered opinion that you are a dumbass. that's all right, you were a little slow in making the assumption mutual. Dude, how do you even have time to post? Aren't you getting behind on your rope flaking?
I was, but then I realized I don't need it.
|
|
|
|
|
hugepedro
Apr 29, 2010, 4:34 PM
Post #146 of 146
(3155 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: johnwesely wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: hugepedro wrote: Well, if you have no means to tie into the anchor, other than the rope, then you are also carrying something that serves only a single, specialized purpose - that 4-8 feet of rope (which is way heavier than my rig). huh? if you and I climb the same pitch, and I tie in with the rope, and you tie in with a PAS, then how is it that I'm carrying more? Cause, like, this isn't making any sense. Or, T0 Because Pedro is so bad at making sense, I will try to explain. His point, at least I think, is that his system allows him to use twin ropes instead of bringing up a second rope for rappels, thus saving weight. However, I may be completely mistaken. I climb with doubles. I've come to the considered opinion that you are a dumbass. that's all right, you were a little slow in making the assumption mutual. Dude, how do you even have time to post? Aren't you getting behind on your rope flaking? I was, but then I realized I don't need it.
Hahaha! Sweet! It's always a good day when you realize you will have more time to post on rc.com. From here on it's post count+++++ for you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
