|
snoopy138
Dec 15, 2010, 5:49 PM
Post #1 of 43
(7597 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992
|
She is trying to user her moderator powers to extort money from the users of this site. See here:
climbs4fun wrote: climbs4fun wrote: obsessed wrote: climbs4fun wrote: chossmonkey wrote: Kelly is deleting? Which Kelly? I didn't delete anything Me either. We play by the rules!! Really I'm just too lazy. And I have an unfair advantage in this game. I can delete even if they've been responded to. And they don't have to be mine to delete. Hmmmmmm. This sounds potentially profitable. How much is that milestone worth for you boys?
I don't think the site should have this sort of person as a member, let alone a moderator.
Thus, my suggestion is that you banz climbs4fun.
|
|
|
|
|
climbs4fun
Moderator
Dec 15, 2010, 5:57 PM
Post #2 of 43
(7591 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 19, 2003
Posts: 9679
|
snoopy138 wrote: She is trying to user her moderator powers to extort money from the users of this site. See here: climbs4fun wrote: climbs4fun wrote: obsessed wrote: climbs4fun wrote: chossmonkey wrote: Kelly is deleting? Which Kelly? I didn't delete anything Me either. We play by the rules!! Really I'm just too lazy. And I have an unfair advantage in this game. I can delete even if they've been responded to. And they don't have to be mine to delete. Hmmmmmm. This sounds potentially profitable. How much is that milestone worth for you boys? I don't think the site should have this sort of person as a member, let alone a moderator. Thus, my suggestion is that you banz climbs4fun.
Only BET users. They don't count
|
|
|
|
|
edge
Dec 15, 2010, 6:11 PM
Post #3 of 43
(7582 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120
|
climbs4fun wrote: snoopy138 wrote: She is trying to user her moderator powers to extort money from the users of this site. See here: climbs4fun wrote: climbs4fun wrote: obsessed wrote: climbs4fun wrote: chossmonkey wrote: Kelly is deleting? Which Kelly? I didn't delete anything Me either. We play by the rules!! Really I'm just too lazy. And I have an unfair advantage in this game. I can delete even if they've been responded to. And they don't have to be mine to delete. Hmmmmmm. This sounds potentially profitable. How much is that milestone worth for you boys? I don't think the site should have this sort of person as a member, let alone a moderator. Thus, my suggestion is that you banz climbs4fun. Only BET users. They don't count
She haz a poynt.
|
|
|
|
|
meatbomz
Dec 15, 2010, 6:14 PM
Post #4 of 43
(7578 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 23, 2010
Posts: 7073
|
snoopy138 wrote: She is trying to user her moderator powers to extort money from the users of this site. See here: climbs4fun wrote: climbs4fun wrote: obsessed wrote: climbs4fun wrote: chossmonkey wrote: Kelly is deleting? Which Kelly? I didn't delete anything Me either. We play by the rules!! Really I'm just too lazy. And I have an unfair advantage in this game. I can delete even if they've been responded to. And they don't have to be mine to delete. Hmmmmmm. This sounds potentially profitable. How much is that milestone worth for you boys? I don't think the site should have this sort of person as a member, let alone a moderator. Thus, my suggestion is that you banz climbs4fun.
I agree that c4f should receive the BANZ HAMMER. Strike her swiftly mods, lest she move our petition to the campground!
|
|
|
|
|
mojomonkey
Dec 15, 2010, 6:27 PM
Post #5 of 43
(7572 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869
|
climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread
|
|
|
|
|
climbs4fun
Moderator
Dec 15, 2010, 6:28 PM
Post #6 of 43
(7571 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 19, 2003
Posts: 9679
|
mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread
Why? It was a joke?
|
|
|
|
|
snoopy138
Dec 15, 2010, 6:30 PM
Post #7 of 43
(7567 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992
|
mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread
I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz.
And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions.
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Dec 15, 2010, 6:32 PM
Post #8 of 43
(7561 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions.
I feel that this is a wag the dog scenario. Snoppy is attempting to redirect attention from his flagrant and repeated parley violations to a very minor corruption case. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that this is merely a cover.
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Dec 15, 2010, 6:33 PM
Post #9 of 43
(7560 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
climbs4fun wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread Why? It was a joke?
|
|
|
|
|
erisspirit
Dec 15, 2010, 6:34 PM
Post #10 of 43
(7560 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770
|
snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions.
they just don't take teh BET seriously 
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Dec 15, 2010, 9:11 PM
Post #11 of 43
(7546 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
Who would take the BET seriously? 
|
|
|
|
|
snoopy138
Dec 15, 2010, 10:34 PM
Post #12 of 43
(7534 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992
|
dr_feelgood wrote: snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions. I feel that this is a wag the dog scenario. Snoppy is attempting to redirect attention from his flagrant and repeated parley violations to a very minor corruption case. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that this is merely a cover.
minor? and everyone violates the parlay, it's pretty much unenforceable at this point. furthermore, nobody on this site looks to me for guidance, whereas climbs4fun is a moderator, potentially held in high esteem by the user base.
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Dec 15, 2010, 11:19 PM
Post #13 of 43
(7525 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
edge wrote: climbs4fun wrote: snoopy138 wrote: She is trying to user her moderator powers to extort money from the users of this site. See here: climbs4fun wrote: climbs4fun wrote: obsessed wrote: climbs4fun wrote: chossmonkey wrote: Kelly is deleting? Which Kelly? I didn't delete anything Me either. We play by the rules!! Really I'm just too lazy. And I have an unfair advantage in this game. I can delete even if they've been responded to. And they don't have to be mine to delete. Hmmmmmm. This sounds potentially profitable. How much is that milestone worth for you boys? I don't think the site should have this sort of person as a member, let alone a moderator. Thus, my suggestion is that you banz climbs4fun. Only BET users. They don't count She haz a poynt.
+1
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Dec 16, 2010, 12:01 AM
Post #14 of 43
(7510 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
macherry wrote: edge wrote: climbs4fun wrote: snoopy138 wrote: She is trying to user her moderator powers to extort money from the users of this site. See here: climbs4fun wrote: climbs4fun wrote: obsessed wrote: climbs4fun wrote: chossmonkey wrote: Kelly is deleting? Which Kelly? I didn't delete anything Me either. We play by the rules!! Really I'm just too lazy. And I have an unfair advantage in this game. I can delete even if they've been responded to. And they don't have to be mine to delete. Hmmmmmm. This sounds potentially profitable. How much is that milestone worth for you boys? I don't think the site should have this sort of person as a member, let alone a moderator. Thus, my suggestion is that you banz climbs4fun. Only BET users. They don't count She haz a poynt. +1
Ummm, isn't "+1" counting?
|
|
|
|
|
edge
Dec 16, 2010, 2:34 AM
Post #15 of 43
(7483 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120
|
bill413 wrote: macherry wrote: edge wrote: climbs4fun wrote: snoopy138 wrote: She is trying to user her moderator powers to extort money from the users of this site. See here: climbs4fun wrote: climbs4fun wrote: obsessed wrote: climbs4fun wrote: chossmonkey wrote: Kelly is deleting? Which Kelly? I didn't delete anything Me either. We play by the rules!! Really I'm just too lazy. And I have an unfair advantage in this game. I can delete even if they've been responded to. And they don't have to be mine to delete. Hmmmmmm. This sounds potentially profitable. How much is that milestone worth for you boys? I don't think the site should have this sort of person as a member, let alone a moderator. Thus, my suggestion is that you banz climbs4fun. Only BET users. They don't count She haz a poynt. +1 Ummm, isn't "+1" counting?
No. It's adding.
I know only this.
|
|
|
|
|
drivel
Dec 16, 2010, 3:46 AM
Post #16 of 43
(7472 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2459
|
edge wrote: bill413 wrote: macherry wrote: edge wrote: climbs4fun wrote: snoopy138 wrote: She is trying to user her moderator powers to extort money from the users of this site. See here: climbs4fun wrote: climbs4fun wrote: obsessed wrote: climbs4fun wrote: chossmonkey wrote: Kelly is deleting? Which Kelly? I didn't delete anything Me either. We play by the rules!! Really I'm just too lazy. And I have an unfair advantage in this game. I can delete even if they've been responded to. And they don't have to be mine to delete. Hmmmmmm. This sounds potentially profitable. How much is that milestone worth for you boys? I don't think the site should have this sort of person as a member, let alone a moderator. Thus, my suggestion is that you banz climbs4fun. Only BET users. They don't count She haz a poynt. +1 Ummm, isn't "+1" counting? No. It's adding. I know only this.
lurker. i know only this.
|
|
|
|
|
meatbomz
Dec 16, 2010, 2:27 PM
Post #17 of 43
(7451 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 23, 2010
Posts: 7073
|
snoopy138 wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions. I feel that this is a wag the dog scenario. Snoppy is attempting to redirect attention from his flagrant and repeated parley violations to a very minor corruption case. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that this is merely a cover. minor? and everyone violates the parlay, it's pretty much unenforceable at this point. furthermore, nobody on this site looks to me for guidance, whereas climbs4fun is a moderator, potentially held in high esteem by the user base.
I didn't vote for her
|
|
|
|
|
snoopy138
Dec 16, 2010, 3:59 PM
Post #18 of 43
(7428 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992
|
meatbomz wrote: snoopy138 wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions. I feel that this is a wag the dog scenario. Snoppy is attempting to redirect attention from his flagrant and repeated parley violations to a very minor corruption case. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that this is merely a cover. minor? and everyone violates the parlay, it's pretty much unenforceable at this point. furthermore, nobody on this site looks to me for guidance, whereas climbs4fun is a moderator, potentially held in high esteem by the user base. I didn't vote for her
well, the non-democratic nature of these forums is another issue that potentially could be brought up in the Suggestions & Feedback forum.
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Dec 16, 2010, 4:07 PM
Post #19 of 43
(7425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
snoopy138 wrote: meatbomz wrote: snoopy138 wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions. I feel that this is a wag the dog scenario. Snoppy is attempting to redirect attention from his flagrant and repeated parley violations to a very minor corruption case. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that this is merely a cover. minor? and everyone violates the parlay, it's pretty much unenforceable at this point. furthermore, nobody on this site looks to me for guidance, whereas climbs4fun is a moderator, potentially held in high esteem by the user base. I didn't vote for her well, the non-democratic nature of these forums is another issue that potentially could be brought up in the Suggestions & Feedback forum.
Way to go, Asshole. It's your fault that C4F can't breath very well.
How can you look at yourself in the mirror?
|
|
|
|
|
artm
Dec 16, 2010, 10:18 PM
Post #20 of 43
(7385 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 22, 2001
Posts: 17990
|
meatbomz wrote: snoopy138 wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions. I feel that this is a wag the dog scenario. Snoppy is attempting to redirect attention from his flagrant and repeated parley violations to a very minor corruption case. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that this is merely a cover. minor? and everyone violates the parlay, it's pretty much unenforceable at this point. furthermore, nobody on this site looks to me for guidance, whereas climbs4fun is a moderator, potentially held in high esteem by the user base. I didn't vote for her
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Dec 16, 2010, 10:33 PM
Post #21 of 43
(7378 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
Hey, that poster looked like Teh Art
*waves*
Hi Art!
|
|
|
|
|
snoopy138
Dec 16, 2010, 10:36 PM
Post #22 of 43
(7374 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992
|
artm wrote: meatbomz wrote: snoopy138 wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions. I feel that this is a wag the dog scenario. Snoppy is attempting to redirect attention from his flagrant and repeated parley violations to a very minor corruption case. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that this is merely a cover. minor? and everyone violates the parlay, it's pretty much unenforceable at this point. furthermore, nobody on this site looks to me for guidance, whereas climbs4fun is a moderator, potentially held in high esteem by the user base. I didn't vote for her Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony
whoa .... you gonna start climbing again now that we've all zent the warmup?
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Dec 16, 2010, 10:52 PM
Post #23 of 43
(7367 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
artm wrote: meatbomz wrote: snoopy138 wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions. I feel that this is a wag the dog scenario. Snoppy is attempting to redirect attention from his flagrant and repeated parley violations to a very minor corruption case. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that this is merely a cover. minor? and everyone violates the parlay, it's pretty much unenforceable at this point. furthermore, nobody on this site looks to me for guidance, whereas climbs4fun is a moderator, potentially held in high esteem by the user base. I didn't vote for her Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony
Holy shit it's the art!
*waves*
Hi Art!
|
|
|
|
|
tripperjm
Dec 17, 2010, 1:00 AM
Post #24 of 43
(7343 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650
|
artm wrote: meatbomz wrote: snoopy138 wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions. I feel that this is a wag the dog scenario. Snoppy is attempting to redirect attention from his flagrant and repeated parley violations to a very minor corruption case. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that this is merely a cover. minor? and everyone violates the parlay, it's pretty much unenforceable at this point. furthermore, nobody on this site looks to me for guidance, whereas climbs4fun is a moderator, potentially held in high esteem by the user base. I didn't vote for her Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony
What teh Fuk??? Teh Art?
*waves*
Yore still alive? I have awlready told everyone ewe were dead.... Now how am I going to explain this. Maybe I could say yore like jebus and have risen from teh dead. Yea, that shud werk.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Dec 17, 2010, 1:10 AM
Post #25 of 43
(7339 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
tripperjm wrote: artm wrote: meatbomz wrote: snoopy138 wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: snoopy138 wrote: mojomonkey wrote: climbs4fun should just quickly delete this hole thread I'm kind of surprised that didn't happen, as out of control as she is with her moderatingz. And of course, another legitimate suggestion has been moved out of the forum for such suggestions. I feel that this is a wag the dog scenario. Snoppy is attempting to redirect attention from his flagrant and repeated parley violations to a very minor corruption case. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that this is merely a cover. minor? and everyone violates the parlay, it's pretty much unenforceable at this point. furthermore, nobody on this site looks to me for guidance, whereas climbs4fun is a moderator, potentially held in high esteem by the user base. I didn't vote for her Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony What teh Fuk??? Teh Art? *waves* Yore still alive? I have awlready told everyone ewe were dead.... Now how am I going to explain this. Maybe I could say yore like jebus and have risen from teh dead. Yea, that shud werk.
Wow. Jebus looked a lot bigger in the pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
