|
chadnsc
Feb 16, 2011, 8:17 PM
Post #26 of 51
(3665 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
spikeddem wrote: sbaclimber wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: I feel like I'm in a dream world where no RC.com'ers remember the exact same problem with the #6 dragon cam by DMM... Yeah you must be dreaming. I mean the OP and several others referneced the problem with the #6 Dragon cam and how it was similar / identical to the problem with the #5 Dragon. I got five stars. Fleeting was your fortune. I've got even more now! Five stars + a couple 1 or 2 star ratings = more than five now! Right?? Nope. It means you suck at math.
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Feb 16, 2011, 8:21 PM
Post #27 of 51
(3660 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
spikeddem wrote: sbaclimber wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: I feel like I'm in a dream world where no RC.com'ers remember the exact same problem with the #6 dragon cam by DMM... Yeah you must be dreaming. I mean the OP and several others referneced the problem with the #6 Dragon cam and how it was similar / identical to the problem with the #5 Dragon. I got five stars. Fleeting was your fortune. I've got even more now! Five stars + a couple 1 or 2 star ratings = more than five now! Right?? Technically, yes. Edit: d'oh, I'm an idiot...and can't read. It even says, "average"... Sorry, Chad's right, you(we) suck at math. Now, watch carefully.......
(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Feb 16, 2011, 8:24 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Feb 16, 2011, 8:24 PM
Post #28 of 51
(3654 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
sbaclimber wrote: spikeddem wrote: sbaclimber wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: I feel like I'm in a dream world where no RC.com'ers remember the exact same problem with the #6 dragon cam by DMM... Yeah you must be dreaming. I mean the OP and several others referneced the problem with the #6 Dragon cam and how it was similar / identical to the problem with the #5 Dragon. I got five stars. Fleeting was your fortune. I've got even more now! Five stars + a couple 1 or 2 star ratings = more than five now! Right?? Technically, yes. Watch carefully....... Technically really just means "duh." duhhhhhhhh
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Feb 16, 2011, 8:26 PM
Post #29 of 51
(3649 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
spikeddem wrote: sbaclimber wrote: spikeddem wrote: sbaclimber wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: I feel like I'm in a dream world where no RC.com'ers remember the exact same problem with the #6 dragon cam by DMM... Yeah you must be dreaming. I mean the OP and several others referneced the problem with the #6 Dragon cam and how it was similar / identical to the problem with the #5 Dragon. I got five stars. Fleeting was your fortune. I've got even more now! Five stars + a couple 1 or 2 star ratings = more than five now! Right?? Technically, yes. Watch carefully....... Technically really just means "duh." duhhhhhhhh *mimicks*, "duhhhhhhhh" [insert drooling smiley here] But, hey, look, you're back up to 3 stars! (at least this time I bothered counting)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Feb 16, 2011, 8:30 PM
Post #30 of 51
(3639 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
And he's back down to two stars. Five votes and two stars.
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Feb 16, 2011, 8:31 PM
Post #31 of 51
(3637 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
erisspirit wrote: chadnsc wrote: majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: majid_sabet wrote: Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ? pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ? BD ? Weren't the Aliens made in USA? they had their problems too they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem" Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here. Way to overlook the facts midget. I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them. of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM it would very difficult to convenes a climber with mechanical background such as myself that " we just saw a problem" and please send it back for refund. climbing is already dangerous and what we have left is 7 oz of metal between ourselves and the earth. Better QA, better testing and longer field test should be conducted before dumping tons of climbing gear in the market. One thing MFGs should remember that a lot of these product may end up in other countries where people are not up to date on information nor they are internet addictive like what we got in USA or Europe and informing those climbers will be very difficult. .
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Feb 16, 2011, 8:36 PM
Post #33 of 51
(3625 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
sbaclimber wrote: chadnsc wrote: And he's back down to two stars. Five votes and two stars. Hey, at least I tried.... It just means even MORE than I said before. 5 * 2 = 10.
|
|
|
|
|
no_email_entered
Feb 16, 2011, 8:36 PM
Post #34 of 51
(3624 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2008
Posts: 558
|
majid_sabet wrote: Better QA, better testing and longer field test should be conducted before dumping tons of climbing gear in the market. One thing MFGs should remember that a lot of these product may end up in other countries where people are not up to date on information nor they are internet addictive like what we got in USA or Europe and informing those climbers will be very difficult. . find any cracks in your duece hammers yet?
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Feb 16, 2011, 8:39 PM
Post #35 of 51
(3618 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
majid_sabet wrote: it would very difficult to convenes a climber with mechanical background such as myself that " we just saw a problem" and please send it back for refund. climbing is already dangerous and what we have left is 7 oz of metal between ourselves and the earth. Better QA, better testing and longer field test should be conducted before dumping tons of climbing gear in the market. One thing MFGs should remember that a lot of these product may end up in other countries where people are not up to date on information nor they are internet addictive like what we got in USA or Europe and informing those climbers will be very difficult. . You were already grossly wrong about DMM having these cams built in China to save money. I have a hard time believing anything you have to say on this subject. Edit: Cheezed a quote.
(This post was edited by chadnsc on Feb 16, 2011, 8:40 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Feb 16, 2011, 8:42 PM
Post #36 of 51
(3611 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
spikeddem wrote: sbaclimber wrote: chadnsc wrote: And he's back down to two stars. Five votes and two stars. Hey, at least I tried.... It just means even MORE than I said before. 5 * 2 = 10. Nope, just means you suck at math even more than before.
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Feb 16, 2011, 8:43 PM
Post #37 of 51
(3609 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: chadnsc wrote: majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: majid_sabet wrote: Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ? pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ? BD ? Weren't the Aliens made in USA? they had their problems too they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem" Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here. Way to overlook the facts midget. I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them. of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM it would very difficult to convenes a climber with mechanical background such as myself that " we just saw a problem" and please send it back for refund. climbing is already dangerous and what we have left is 7 oz of metal between ourselves and the earth. Better QA, better testing and longer field test should be conducted before dumping tons of climbing gear in the market. Although I don't dissagree in principal, please tell us what an "acceptable" and realistic level of testing would be! Both DMM and BD (who does produce in China) use 3 Sigma testing. Please do tell what you would do better...
|
|
|
|
|
tower_climber
Feb 17, 2011, 1:38 AM
Post #38 of 51
(3520 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 25, 2010
Posts: 157
|
sbaclimber wrote: Although I don't dissagree in principal, please tell us what an "acceptable" and realistic level of testing would be! Both DMM and BD (who does produce in China) use 3 Sigma testing. Please do tell what you would do better... Majid would never have to test any climbing gear he produced, because with his mechanical background he would never have a product with an issue. Duh.
|
|
|
|
|
jbro_135
Feb 17, 2011, 1:41 AM
Post #39 of 51
(3518 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2009
Posts: 662
|
tower_climber wrote: sbaclimber wrote: Although I don't dissagree in principal, please tell us what an "acceptable" and realistic level of testing would be! Both DMM and BD (who does produce in China) use 3 Sigma testing. Please do tell what you would do better... Majid would never have to test any climbing gear he produced, because with his mechanical background he would never have a product with an issue. Duh. also majid will never test any climbing gear because he doesn't climb
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Feb 17, 2011, 8:13 AM
Post #40 of 51
(3455 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
At present there is NO evidence that ANY Dragon Cam has failed below the rated strength. What is evident is that residual stresses between the axle boss and the stem over a long period of time can sometimes cause fracture cracks in the axle boss.
|
|
|
|
|
Chrisrow
Feb 17, 2011, 9:19 AM
Post #41 of 51
(3444 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 16
|
Hi Guys , Yes we do have a full recall for all Dragon size 4,and 5. The size six recall is still current. At present we have photographic evidence of three size 5 cams with visible cracks, but as yet no examples of size 4 Dragon Cams. In the circumstances we thought it best to recall both sizes, as climbers safety is paramount here. We have tried to publish the information through as many channels as possible world wide, and welcome any help in relaying this information to those climbers who mIght not have heard. The recall does not effect the Dragon size 1,2 and 3, as these have a different construction. The full details are posted on the recall notice on our site and we try to keep people updated as and when appropriate. In the meantime we thank Mountain Gear for their vigilance, and also our Distributors in the US, Excalibur for the extra work that this will unfortunately heap upon them. We have already set in place a system to rebuild/replace the units and will do everything in our power to ensure a quick turnaround. Thankyou for your help and patience. Best Chris Rowlands Brand Manager DMM
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Feb 17, 2011, 10:00 AM
Post #42 of 51
(3435 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: chadnsc wrote: majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: majid_sabet wrote: Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ? pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ? BD ? Weren't the Aliens made in USA? they had their problems too they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem" Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here. Way to overlook the facts midget. I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them. of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM like what we got in USA or Europe . What do you mean "we"? You are not even a US citizen, have you even ever visited the USA? And your not in Europe either, I think your lost.
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Feb 17, 2011, 1:02 PM
Post #43 of 51
(3402 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: I feel like I'm in a dream world where no RC.com'ers remember the exact same problem with the #6 dragon cam by DMM... Yeah you must be dreaming. I mean the OP and several others referneced the problem with the #6 Dragon cam and how it was similar / identical to the problem with the #5 Dragon. I got five stars. You have seven stars now. Spread out over seven ratings, but still.
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Feb 17, 2011, 4:52 PM
Post #44 of 51
(3348 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
USnavy wrote: majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: chadnsc wrote: majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: majid_sabet wrote: Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ? pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ? BD ? Weren't the Aliens made in USA? they had their problems too they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem" Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here. Way to overlook the facts midget. I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them. of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM like what we got in USA or Europe . What do you mean "we"? You are not even a US citizen, have you even ever visited the USA? And your not in Europe either, I think your lost. No , But I know US history pretty well
|
|
|
|
|
erisspirit
Feb 17, 2011, 5:12 PM
Post #45 of 51
(3336 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770
|
Chrisrow wrote: Hi Guys , Yes we do have a full recall for all Dragon size 4,and 5. The size six recall is still current. At present we have photographic evidence of three size 5 cams with visible cracks, but as yet no examples of size 4 Dragon Cams. In the circumstances we thought it best to recall both sizes, as climbers safety is paramount here. We have tried to publish the information through as many channels as possible world wide, and welcome any help in relaying this information to those climbers who mIght not have heard. The recall does not effect the Dragon size 1,2 and 3, as these have a different construction. The full details are posted on the recall notice on our site and we try to keep people updated as and when appropriate. In the meantime we thank Mountain Gear for their vigilance, and also our Distributors in the US, Excalibur for the extra work that this will unfortunately heap upon them. We have already set in place a system to rebuild/replace the units and will do everything in our power to ensure a quick turnaround. Thankyou for your help and patience. Best Chris Rowlands Brand Manager DMM Thanks for the quick actions. WOO! I have sizes 1-3! I'm good
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Feb 17, 2011, 5:52 PM
Post #46 of 51
(3323 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
majid_sabet wrote: USnavy wrote: majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: chadnsc wrote: majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: majid_sabet wrote: Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ? pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ? BD ? Weren't the Aliens made in USA? they had their problems too they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem" Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here. Way to overlook the facts midget. I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them. of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM like what we got in USA or Europe . What do you mean "we"? You are not even a US citizen, have you even ever visited the USA? And your not in Europe either, I think your lost. No , But I know US history pretty well You mean like how well you 'know' where the Dragon cams are made? Like how well you 'know' that the testing done on the Dragon cams wasn't sufficient? Like how well you 'know' what caused the issues with the Dragon cams? Sure midget, sure.
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Feb 17, 2011, 9:25 PM
Post #47 of 51
(3278 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
chadnsc wrote: majid_sabet wrote: USnavy wrote: majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: chadnsc wrote: majid_sabet wrote: erisspirit wrote: majid_sabet wrote: Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ? pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ? BD ? Weren't the Aliens made in USA? they had their problems too they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem" Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here. Way to overlook the facts midget. I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them. of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM like what we got in USA or Europe . What do you mean "we"? You are not even a US citizen, have you even ever visited the USA? And your not in Europe either, I think your lost. No , But I know US history pretty well You mean like how well you 'know' where the Dragon cams are made? Like how well you 'know' that the testing done on the Dragon cams wasn't sufficient? Like how well you 'know' what caused the issues with the Dragon cams? Sure midget, sure. Hey, you shouldn't be so hard on Majid. He is just trying to fit in around here...
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Feb 17, 2011, 9:27 PM
Post #48 of 51
(3273 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
He's been tryin' for a few years now.
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Feb 17, 2011, 9:33 PM
Post #49 of 51
(3268 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
chadnsc wrote: He's been tryin' for a few years now. Yeah, but he's starting to get the hang of it. Instead of drawings of red and green arrows (I actually miss those ), he is now posting suggested information that is either based on ignorance and/or refusal to use Google to check facts before posting, laziness, or an attempt at trolling. All he needs now is to throw in some gross exaggeration (see thread about traps), and he will fit right in. @Majid, please never leave! You have recognised your role here and accepted it, and I tip my hat to you for it.
|
|
|
|
|
erisspirit
Feb 17, 2011, 9:39 PM
Post #50 of 51
(3264 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770
|
sbaclimber wrote: chadnsc wrote: He's been tryin' for a few years now. Yeah, but he's starting to get the hang of it. Instead of drawings of red and green arrows (I actually miss those ), he is now posting suggested information that is either based on ignorance and/or refusal to use Google to check facts before posting, laziness, or an attempt at trolling. All he needs now is to throw in some gross exaggeration (see thread about traps), and he will fit right in. @Majid, please never leave! You have recognised your role here and accepted it, and I tip my hat to you for it. don't forget to add in a couple gud sotries that make you an expert "I had a friend that had a cousin whose neighbor did the same thing.... "
|
|
|
|
|
|