|
milesenoell
Feb 28, 2011, 11:16 PM
Post #1 of 40
(15635 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
I've been wondering, does anybody know how aid compares to free climbing in terms of A&I rates?
Aid feels scarier than free to me, but frankly I have no idea if it really is any more dangerous. Anybody know?
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Mar 1, 2011, 1:17 AM
Post #3 of 40
(15521 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
milesenoell wrote: I've been wondering, does anybody know how aid compares to free climbing in terms of A&I rates? Aid feels scarier than free to me, but frankly I have no idea if it really is any more dangerous. Anybody know?
aid climbers are overall good climbers but when they fall, they pull pros left and right till they meet belayer
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Mar 1, 2011, 1:37 AM
Post #4 of 40
(15506 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
majid_sabet wrote: milesenoell wrote: I've been wondering, does anybody know how aid compares to free climbing in terms of A&I rates? Aid feels scarier than free to me, but frankly I have no idea if it really is any more dangerous. Anybody know? aid climbers are overall good climbers but when they fall, they pull pros left and right till they meet belayer
Huh?
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Mar 1, 2011, 1:38 AM
Post #5 of 40
(15504 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
majid_sabet wrote: aid climbers are overall good climbers but when they fall, they pull pros left and right till they meet belayer
You're suppose to put a happy face at the end of that kind of spew, that way we all recognize that you were joking, and not just a mentally challenged individual.
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Mar 1, 2011, 1:55 AM
Post #6 of 40
(15492 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
I'm still laughing at that video. That video was just the kind of thing I was looking for. A seasoned climber's honest opinion is often more desirable (to me at least) than a heap of statistics.
It sounds to me about like I suspected: aid climbing gives you a wealth of opportunities to psyche yourself up, but that the risks remain within a familiar zone.
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Mar 1, 2011, 1:59 AM
Post #7 of 40
(15484 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2437
|
Aid climbing can be very dangerous, just like free climbing. It all depends on your skill level and what you're attempting.
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Mar 1, 2011, 2:06 AM
Post #8 of 40
(15476 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
socalclimber wrote: Aid climbing can be very dangerous, just like free climbing. It all depends on your skill level and what you're attempting.
I would hope that goes without saying.
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Mar 1, 2011, 2:16 AM
Post #9 of 40
(15466 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2437
|
You'd be surprised...
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Mar 1, 2011, 3:58 AM
Post #10 of 40
(15389 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
billcoe_ wrote: majid_sabet wrote: aid climbers are overall good climbers but when they fall, they pull pros left and right till they meet belayer You're suppose to put a happy face at the end of that kind of spew, that way we all recognize that you were joking, and not just a mentally challenged individual.
As I said, they will pull pros till they reach their point of start (normally at belayer's level) but I never read or heard some one died while aid climbing.
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Mar 1, 2011, 4:29 AM
Post #11 of 40
(15368 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
majid_sabet wrote: As I said, they will pull pros till they reach their point of start (normally at belayer's level) but I never read or heard some one died while aid climbing.
hey ya mista mahh jeed .... y duntcha list da aid routes you have done ...
im shuuure an upstanding 5.7 climber like ya has done sum krazy hard aid ... at least A3 ....
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Mar 1, 2011, 4:33 AM
Post #12 of 40
(15361 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
It's death up there miles... death.
|
|
|
|
|
dreday3000
Mar 1, 2011, 4:38 AM
Post #13 of 40
(15353 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566
|
dangerously boring
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Mar 1, 2011, 4:42 AM
Post #14 of 40
(15352 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
bearbreeder wrote: majid_sabet wrote: As I said, they will pull pros till they reach their point of start (normally at belayer's level) but I never read or heard some one died while aid climbing. hey ya mista mahh jeed .... y duntcha list da aid routes you have done ... im shuuure an upstanding 5.7 climber like ya has done sum krazy hard aid ... at least A3 ....
why are you following this wabbitt like yosemite sam with a gun ?
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Mar 1, 2011, 5:05 AM
Post #16 of 40
(15326 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
bearbreeder wrote: majid_sabet wrote: why are you following this wabbitt like yosemite sam with a gun ? oh my ... guns now? ... what next ... lol just wondering about the aid climbs youve done since you said "aid climbers are overall good climbers but when they fall, they pull pros left and right till they meet belayer " you wouldnt say such a thing without aid climbing would u now ... nahhhhh 
me ? probebly none but then you would not believe it either
do you?
|
|
|
|
|
Guran
Mar 1, 2011, 1:28 PM
Post #17 of 40
(15250 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 18, 2008
Posts: 220
|
milesenoell wrote: I've been wondering, does anybody know how aid compares to free climbing in terms of A&I rates? Aid feels scarier than free to me, but frankly I have no idea if it really is any more dangerous. Anybody know?
Well... Statistics might be misleading.
Here's the ting.
For sport climbing, the harder the route the safer the climber since harder generally equals steeper and less featured rock which equals less risk of slamming into something when you fall.
For trad climbing it depends. Some venture into the poorly protected routes in micronuts and taped hook territory. Others prefer to go for steep cracks where the pro is still good even if the route is hard.
But for aid (as well as ice and alpine), "harder" always equals "more dangerous". Without taking risks you'll never get above the weekend warrior level. If you are content with that, and stay focused, aid is not inherently dangerous. If you have ambitions, realize you will be betting your life.
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Mar 1, 2011, 2:19 PM
Post #18 of 40
(15231 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
Guran wrote: milesenoell wrote: I've been wondering, does anybody know how aid compares to free climbing in terms of A&I rates? Aid feels scarier than free to me, but frankly I have no idea if it really is any more dangerous. Anybody know? Well... Statistics might be misleading. Here's the ting. For sport climbing, the harder the route the safer the climber since harder generally equals steeper and less featured rock which equals less risk of slamming into something when you fall. For trad climbing it depends. Some venture into the poorly protected routes in micronuts and taped hook territory. Others prefer to go for steep cracks where the pro is still good even if the route is hard. But for aid (as well as ice and alpine), "harder" always equals "more dangerous". Without taking risks you'll never get above the weekend warrior level. If you are content with that, and stay focused, aid is not inherently dangerous. If you have ambitions, realize you will be betting your life.
Ok, then– as the video I posted originally asks, I will ask you the same question:
How many hard aid climbers have died from doing hard aid? I'm not talking about rappel accidents, objective hazards like rockfall or weather, or anything like that. I mean, how many hard aid climbers have died when their hook placement, or bubblegum copperhead, or rp string blew out, and they cratered?
If hard aid is really more dangerous, there should be more fatalities, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Guran
Mar 1, 2011, 3:07 PM
Post #19 of 40
(15198 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 18, 2008
Posts: 220
|
camhead wrote: Ok, then– as the video I posted originally asks, I will ask you the same question: How many hard aid climbers have died from doing hard aid? I'm not talking about rappel accidents, objective hazards like rockfall or weather, or anything like that. I mean, how many hard aid climbers have died when their hook placement, or bubblegum copperhead, or rp string blew out, and they cratered? If hard aid is really more dangerous, there should be more fatalities, right?
As I said, statistics are misleading here.
Off the top of my head I can't think of a single "proper" aid fatality, though I'm sure there has been some. That does not in any way mean that hard aid is not sick dangerous. Hard aid is all about cutting your safety margins thin. (After all, you could have brought out the drill and placed a bolt, but chosed not to.)
That does not equal certain death-by-gravity, but it does mean not only "don't fuck up" but also "don't have bad luck".
So dangerous in the same sense as carrying a bottle of nitroglycerin in your pocket. Don't trip and don't fuck around with it and you'll be fine. Nobody would argue, however, that it's not dangerous.
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Mar 1, 2011, 3:54 PM
Post #20 of 40
(15170 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
majid_sabet wrote: me ? probebly none but then you would not believe it either do you?
im not the one claiming
"aid climbers are overall good climbers but when they fall, they pull pros left and right till they meet belayer "
mista mahhh jeeed
|
|
|
|
|
skiclimb
Mar 1, 2011, 4:41 PM
Post #21 of 40
(15142 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 11, 2004
Posts: 1938
|
Is aid really dangerous.
nah it's always safe. Aid climbing unlike real climbing never has rockfall (nice bonus we don't ever wear helmets). Aid climbing guarantees good weather and eliminate all objective hazards. In Aid climbng the rope can never get cut the gear can never break. All placements are always bomber ...that is why we can use hooks for pro. Operator error is impossible in aid climbing.
Aid climbing automatically makes you a genius incapable of distraction or misjudgement.
Aid climbing makes it impossible to get hurt if you fall. just ask Dean Potter. Thats why most aid climbers don't even own a rope and if we do it's a static.
Aid climbing makes you invulnerable. This is why our chalkbag contains a lighter and a pack of non-filter cigarettes for leading.
(This post was edited by skiclimb on Mar 1, 2011, 4:48 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
fresh
Mar 1, 2011, 5:01 PM
Post #22 of 40
(15110 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199
|
camhead wrote: If hard aid is really more dangerous, there should be more fatalities, right?
I can't really put my finger on it, but there's something about the amount of attention or skill required to stay safe in a given situation that has a lot to do with how dangerous it is, to me. how many accidents happen on R rated routes? does that mean R rated routes aren't dangerous?
anyway it's possible that aid climbing really isn't that dangerous, I dunno. but to say that just because there aren't more fatalities it's not dangerous, is mullarky to me.
(btw I love that rant, can't see it at work, but I'm pretty sure I know the one.)
|
|
|
|
|
summerprophet
Mar 1, 2011, 7:30 PM
Post #23 of 40
(15053 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 17, 2004
Posts: 764
|
camhead wrote: If hard aid is really more dangerous, there should be more fatalities, right?
Hard aid is about putting you in a position of danger, whether it is dangerous or not is completly subjective to the individual.
Let me explain:
hard aid is classified both on the potential length of fall, and the difficulty or the placements.
Compared to free soloing, the fall distance would alway be to the ground..... but if the climb is 5.2, where every hold is burying your entire arm solidly into a perfect crack, the chances of falling are fairly minimal.
If the climb is a 5.11 tips crack, again, the fall is all the way to the ground, AND DEPENDING ON THE CLIMBER, this could be an incredibly secure route, with minimal fall hazard...... or impossible to get off the ground.
Aid climbing is similar to this. A5 climbing involves numerous precarious pieces for dozens or hundreds of feet, however without it is hard to get very far into this terrain without being proficiant at the skills to begin with.
Compare it to running a marathon, you don't just get off the couch one day, and run a marathon.... or if you do, you quickly realize that you aren't prepared and you pull over.
Hard aid is the art of Micro-Engineering, in essence, you have a bunch of stuff, and you have to deduce a way to get something to stick long enough for you to move upward to figure out something else.
Yes, Taped hooks in microedges happen, and if you shift your weight at all, they will blow, BUT how the hell do you think you ended up standing on it if you didn't have those skills allready.
In my Opinion, turning 16 and buying a sportbike is INFINITLY more dangerous than working your way up to hard aid.
|
|
|
|
|
coastal_climber
Mar 3, 2011, 4:37 AM
Post #24 of 40
(14921 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 2542
|
Its as dangerous as you want to make it.
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Mar 3, 2011, 7:44 AM
Post #25 of 40
(14874 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
No form of climbing done by competent climbers is as dangerous as the casino-like overall demographic of gym/sport climbers equipped with grigris. It's surviving the latter and climbing long enough to join the ranks of the former that's the challenge. After that there are lots of ways to hurt yourself, but at least it will be honest pilot error in most of those cases (ok, so that's little comfort...).
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
