|
|
|
|
dead_horse_flats
Feb 3, 2012, 10:11 PM
Post #26 of 92
(22522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2006
Posts: 64
|
cracklover wrote: [ Okay, but we got a foot of snow last night, and it's going to keep dumping all day today, so it will be some time before all this melts and I can take real photos outdoors. Would you prefer to wait, or shall I simulate it as well as I can indoors? At some point, I will try to recruit someone to shoot video, because actually watching the rope wiggling out from the first biner is much different than just seeing still pics of the progress. The escape from the second biner is more straightforward. Just the same, I'm confident that between text and photos, you should understand it well enough to be able to recreate it yourself. Anyway, please spell out your terms - what do you need from me? Real situation outdoors, or simulated indoors? Photos and instructions enough, or do you need video? Because if you need real video from outdoors, it could be a long time. (As I said, I'll try to do the video at some point even if you accept still shots now. Maybe my wife will agree to help if I split the $40 with her). GO You wont get a little wet and cold for $40. Actually go ahead and try the pictures indoors for a start and we'll see if it works.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Feb 3, 2012, 11:50 PM
Post #27 of 92
(22510 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
dead_horse_flats wrote: cracklover wrote: [ Okay, but we got a foot of snow last night, and it's going to keep dumping all day today, so it will be some time before all this melts and I can take real photos outdoors. Would you prefer to wait, or shall I simulate it as well as I can indoors? At some point, I will try to recruit someone to shoot video, because actually watching the rope wiggling out from the first biner is much different than just seeing still pics of the progress. The escape from the second biner is more straightforward. Just the same, I'm confident that between text and photos, you should understand it well enough to be able to recreate it yourself. Anyway, please spell out your terms - what do you need from me? Real situation outdoors, or simulated indoors? Photos and instructions enough, or do you need video? Because if you need real video from outdoors, it could be a long time. (As I said, I'll try to do the video at some point even if you accept still shots now. Maybe my wife will agree to help if I split the $40 with her). GO You wont get a little wet and cold for $40. Actually go ahead and try the pictures indoors for a start and we'll see if it works. Nothing to do with cold and wet. I have no exposed rock. Yea or nay on pics indoors? I'm not going to go through the trouble for "we'll see". I already know the answer to your question. You want to know it too, then you tell me the parameters you need. GO
|
|
|
|
|
dead_horse_flats
Feb 4, 2012, 4:47 AM
Post #28 of 92
(22480 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2006
Posts: 64
|
Indoors or out, I dont care. What matters is if you can adequately demonstrate and explain the process. If you can do that with photos, fine. If not then do a video. Pound some nails in your kitchen wall and build an anchor off those. The only thing that matters to me is that you explain it in a way that others can understand.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Feb 4, 2012, 6:10 PM
Post #29 of 92
(22433 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
Okay. It'll take some time to do right. But unless things get crazy at work, I should have it for you within the week. GO
|
|
|
|
|
dead_horse_flats
Feb 4, 2012, 11:48 PM
Post #30 of 92
(22397 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2006
Posts: 64
|
PM sent with terms and conditions for using a 3rd party judge.
|
|
|
|
|
jae8908
Feb 17, 2012, 3:25 AM
Post #31 of 92
(22258 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 15, 2011
Posts: 270
|
cracklover wrote: Okay. It'll take some time to do right. But unless things get crazy at work, I should have it for you within the week. GO Did you succeed?
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Feb 17, 2012, 4:46 PM
Post #32 of 92
(22203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
jae8908 wrote: cracklover wrote: Okay. It'll take some time to do right. But unless things get crazy at work, I should have it for you within the week. GO Did you succeed? My bad - haven't made it a priority. Between work, climbing, and VDay, I've been busy. Will work on it today after work and see how far i get. Thanks for the reminder. GO
|
|
|
|
|
jae8908
Feb 18, 2012, 5:54 AM
Post #33 of 92
(22161 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 15, 2011
Posts: 270
|
cracklover wrote: jae8908 wrote: cracklover wrote: Okay. It'll take some time to do right. But unless things get crazy at work, I should have it for you within the week. GO Did you succeed? My bad - haven't made it a priority. Between work, climbing, and VDay, I've been busy. Will work on it today after work and see how far i get. Thanks for the reminder. GO Good Luck!
|
|
|
|
|
tower_climber
Apr 5, 2012, 5:07 AM
Post #34 of 92
(21854 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 25, 2010
Posts: 157
|
Did this thing ever happen?
|
|
|
|
|
moose_droppings
Apr 5, 2012, 5:30 AM
Post #35 of 92
(21848 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371
|
cracklover wrote: I already know the answer to your question. You want to know it too, then you tell me the parameters you need. GO The parameters seem to get more rigid for each possible scenario offered up.
|
|
|
|
|
squierbypetzl
Moderator
Apr 6, 2012, 1:42 AM
Post #37 of 92
(21708 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3431
|
I'm curious to see the results.
|
|
|
|
|
ianmeister89
Apr 6, 2012, 9:16 PM
Post #39 of 92
(21601 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: 140
|
-Ian
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Apr 6, 2012, 10:35 PM
Post #40 of 92
(21580 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
ianmeister89 wrote: [image]http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/18005541.jpg[/image] -Ian That literally made me LOL! GO
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Apr 6, 2012, 10:38 PM
Post #41 of 92
(21579 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
Okay, so I tried photos, but they're meaningless. All it looks like is a rope unclipping from biners. So I had to go with video. I have no idea how well it will come out, since it's me operating the rope, and the video. But hopefully my explanations will be the main thing, and the video will just be explanatory. The video is captured, but editing and loading may take some time... GO
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Apr 7, 2012, 2:46 PM
Post #42 of 92
(21523 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
dead_horse_flats wrote: This is a $40 offer to anyone who can demonstrate a scenario of the failure of a top rope anchor using two non-locking opposed biners at the power point. Disclaimers. 1. Opposed means opposed. 2. No manually holding the biners to force the rope thru them. 3. No wrapping the rope around the biners unless you can create a situation where this could happen un-intentionally. 4. Failure means the rope escaped from BOTH biners. Both means both. 5. No theories, microfractures, CE marks, or alien abductions. Prove it and I will mail you $40. Okay, here ya go. Note - this post is getting quite long, so I'm going to split it up into sections. Here's the first part.... Setup - anchor configuration: ------------------------------------ - Two non-locking wiregate oval biners, opposite and opposed, with gates facing down and out - Static rope anchor, tied in a fig-8 knot on a bight. Step one - biner location: ----------------------------------- Two things have to happen, in no particular order: - The gates wind up inside the spine of the other biner. When you jostle the biners around, the gates will always settle either inside or outside the spine of the other biner. - The biners wind up sitting on the edge. A few things that could cause this are that one of the anchor points snags on something, shortening that arm, or that the anchor was set up poorly, such that when weighted, the biners are over the edge, but when some of the weight is released, the biners get pulled up onto it. Step 2 - gate opens: -------------------------------- If the edge is rough, the gate on the inner biner can get caught on even a small jut. Then a downward pull on the anchor can cause that gate to open. This can happen even without any sideways pull in the direction of the jut. Once the gate gets caught, the biners can rotate onto the bump on the rock, making it so that any force will cause the gate to open. link to video 1 Let's step back for a second - Why should it matter all that much if, when the climber's weight comes off the anchor, it can wind up sitting on the edge, and then if the weight goes back on it, it causes the gate to open momentarily? After all, I'm sure plenty of you are thinking, the biners are plenty strong enough to hold a small toprope fall, even with one gate open. And if a fall on the anchor causes it to get pulled all the way back over the edge, the gate will close on its own. All true! But... what if there were something that could cause the rope to escape the biner while it's open? Well it turns out that, given the following scenario, that's exactly what can happen. Read on...
(This post was edited by cracklover on Apr 7, 2012, 5:44 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Apr 7, 2012, 5:06 PM
Post #43 of 92
(21491 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
... continued from last post. Step 3 - rope gets caught in first biner --------------------------------------------- If, while the gate is caught open on the rock, the climber goes up and to the right, the rope can get caught in the open gate. Why would this happen? Well, perhaps the leader of the group, who set up the toprope, asks the person climbing to check on the anchor, noticing that the biners seem to be sitting on the edge. Perhaps they remembered seeing something that might snag one of the arms of the anchor up on the right. link to video 2 Step 4 - rope escapes first biner ------------------------------------- Once the rope is caught under the gate, I noticed two ways it can wind up getting pulled out completely. In this step, I'll demonstrate the first way. With the climber still above and right of the anchor, the belayer takes in a couple of inches of slack. link to video 3 Let's step back again and see where we are. Okay, so the climber is slightly above the anchor and to the right, and is now clipped into only one biner. Technically, they're still safe, though. And, because the other biner is oriented in the opposite direction, it cannot get levered open on that nub of rock no matter how much the climber thrashes around trying to fix the anchor. And even if it did, the rope running up and to the right would never wind up going through the open gate on the *left* side. So let's say this climber doesn't notice what's happened (the anchor might be under his body) - he would lower safely to the ground. After all, both biners are still clipped to the power point, and unless he looks carefully, he might not see that one of the biners (remember, it's the bottom one, and might be slightly hidden by the top one) is not clipped to the rope. But again, he's still safe. Now the next climber to go up on the TR is another story. Read on...
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Apr 7, 2012, 5:39 PM
Post #44 of 92
(21480 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
... continued from last post. Step 5 - Biners flip over ---------------------------- If the next climber to do the TR ties into the other end of the rope, something interesting can happen. If the second climber does the same thing as the first climber (going up and right of the anchor) - let's say because this climber hopes to fix the problem the first climber didn't, the biners can be flipped over when they climb over the anchor, and will orient themselves like they were in the beginning. Sorry, I didn't think to video this step, and I broke down my setup yesterday. But if you want, I can set it up again and video it. Step 6 - rope escapes from second biner ----------------------------------------------- In step 4 I showed one way that the rope, caught in the gate, can escape the biner completely when the belayer takes in a little slack. I mentioned that I had noticed a second way for the same thing to happen. In this step I'll show that second way. Of course in real life, either way could happen either time. The second way the rope can escape the biner completely: If there is a little bit of tension on the belayer end of the rope (it only took a few pounds when I tried), and the climber moves up, the biner scrapes on the rock and gets held in place while the rope moves out of it. This shot shows the whole thing happening at once: link to video 4 So there you go. In six steps, a scenario in which a toprope setup for a standard slingshot belay fails completely, leaving the climber on belay from below, but completely unanchored. Cheers, GO
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Apr 7, 2012, 6:26 PM
Post #45 of 92
(21468 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
Cheers! GO
|
|
|
|
|
iknowfear
Apr 7, 2012, 6:55 PM
Post #46 of 92
(21462 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670
|
cracklover wrote: [image]http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/18053429.jpg[/image] Cheers! GO Fair and square win. what are you going to spend your 40$ on? Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
billl7
Apr 7, 2012, 7:44 PM
Post #47 of 92
(21446 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1890
|
iknowfear wrote: Fair and square win. what are you going to spend your 40$ on? Not so fast. I always thought that the definition of leading was climbing above the anchor. So, by definition, this is not a standard sling-shot belay.
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Apr 7, 2012, 10:02 PM
Post #48 of 92
(21421 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
Two points of failure - a) don't use wiregates for TR anchors and b) never have a TR located where the rock can significantly impose on the biners. Absent those points there are no circumstances where a TR of two opposed, non-locking biners is going to fail. The odds are about a billion to one better that you will die going to and from that TR anchor in your car.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Hudon
Apr 8, 2012, 3:26 AM
Post #49 of 92
(21383 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2010
Posts: 82
|
Following my oath of "NO SNARK" I shall not make a comment.
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Apr 8, 2012, 3:40 AM
Post #50 of 92
(21379 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
Mark_Hudon wrote: Following my oath of "NO SNARK" I shall not make a comment. You are a prince of Snarklessness and should not dare a dimming of your true light...
|
|
|
|
|
|