Forums: Climbing Information: Accident and Incident Analysis:
Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Accident and Incident Analysis

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All


Partner cracklover


Oct 9, 2012, 8:19 PM
Post #26 of 35 (4860 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [hugepedro] Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

OK, on further research, it looks like a new sport route was bolted there since my guidebook came out, and they were on Lady and the Tramp. Two pitch, 5.4, bolted.

Anyway...

To answer your question directly, robx - I have no idea what the deal was in the first situation, when you were still on CDDD, but in answer to the second situation, when you were at the base, it sounds like this was the situation:

Leader was getting lowered off pitch one of Lady and the Tramp, cleaning his draws as he went. His rope was roughly 30 feet too short. Am I describing correctly the scene you came upon? If so...

If there were no bolts in the first 30 feet, I would just tie my rope to his, pass the knot in the belay, and lower him the rest of the way.

If there were bolts in the first 30 feet, I would probably solo up to clean the draws, climb back down, and then do the same as above.

If there were bolts in the first 30 feet, and for whatever reason I didn't feel comfortable soloing it, I'd do the following:
1 - Tie my rope to theirs.
2 - Have the belayer lower the leader until the rope runs out.
3 - Put the leader on belay below the knot, and mule it off.
4 - Have the belayer take the leader off belay (now the leader is on me.)
5 - Climb the first 30 feet, using the leader as a counterweight to protect myself, cleaning the draws as I go.
6 - Once the climber is on the ground, and I have cleaned all the gear, undo the mule knot, and single-strand rappel (still using the leader as a counterweight) to the ground myself.

GO


Partner cracklover


Oct 9, 2012, 8:22 PM
Post #27 of 35 (4858 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [hugepedro] Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hugepedro wrote:
I assumed the munter hitch would be for the leader, who didn't have a belay device, to belay up the second?

How does that help anything? Now you just have two climbers stranded with a too-short rope, instead of one.

In reply to:
I still don't understand why he didn't just tie his rope on theirs and finish lowering the guy. N00bs rescuing n00bs, I guess.

That's pretty much what I suggested.

GO


hugepedro


Oct 9, 2012, 9:16 PM
Post #28 of 35 (4838 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875

Re: [cracklover] Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
hugepedro wrote:
I assumed the munter hitch would be for the leader, who didn't have a belay device, to belay up the second?

How does that help anything? Now you just have two climbers stranded with a too-short rope, instead of one.

GO

Lots of assumptions here, but I assume he was going to suggest a munter hitch belay by the leader so that they would have a means of finishing the climbing and then using whatever standard descent is there, rather than trying to lower off.


Partner cracklover


Oct 9, 2012, 9:41 PM
Post #29 of 35 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [hugepedro] Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hugepedro wrote:
cracklover wrote:
hugepedro wrote:
I assumed the munter hitch would be for the leader, who didn't have a belay device, to belay up the second?

How does that help anything? Now you just have two climbers stranded with a too-short rope, instead of one.

GO

Lots of assumptions here, but I assume he was going to suggest a munter hitch belay by the leader so that they would have a means of finishing the climbing and then using whatever standard descent is there, rather than trying to lower off.

Okay, that makes sense. In fact, I see that one of the comments on the route description on MP suggests that parties walk off. So perhaps that's what the OP had in mind. Certainly very unusual for Rumney, so I had no idea that's what he meant (if it is indeed what he had in mind).

GO


ClimbSoHigh


Oct 10, 2012, 5:16 PM
Post #30 of 35 (4767 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 28, 2008
Posts: 208

Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Since this took place on CDD with roped teams, I second the less of a gumby helping more of a gumby theory.

Assuming the guy was about to be lowered off the end of the rope, good to hear the OP got that safety knot tied in time, or this jumbled mess of an almost accident could have been an actual accident report.

To clarify the climb, the first 40 feet you can walk up standing up with no hands. The first pitch is over 30M long (guessing a 40M pitch), so you cannot double rope rap from the ledge on a single 60M rope. If you try you will come up about 30 feet short.

What really confuses me (other than the munter part) is that the party could not lower the climber back to the ground since there was not enough rope to do so, resulting in an almost accident. If you have enough rope for the leader to climb to the ledge, you also have enough rope to lower the same distance + rope stretch. Also, lowering the climber would strand the belayer on the 1/2 way ledge.

To save the day all you would have had to do when you got to the ledge is lower both of them single strand back to the ground. Then finish your climb.

Or you could help them fix their rope to the anchor, have them both rap single strand to the gournd, and then booty their rope. Think of it as helping to prevent future accidents.


jakedatc


Oct 10, 2012, 10:20 PM
Post #31 of 35 (4719 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [ClimbSoHigh] Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

or they could have just swung over 10' to the woods and walked down.

it amazes me people rappel Clippity.. it takes 5 minutes to walk down and much longer to rap.. Crazy


jt512


Oct 10, 2012, 11:13 PM
Post #32 of 35 (4709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [jakedatc] Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
or they could have just swung over 10' to the woods and walked down.

it amazes me people rappel Clippity.. it takes 5 minutes to walk down and much longer to rap.. Crazy

N00bs rap. You know that.


tradmanclimbs


Oct 11, 2012, 12:34 AM
Post #33 of 35 (4691 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 2599

Re: [jt512] Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I have only done clippity oce. Not familar with the terrain up there so I strapped a rope on my back and hiked up it and rapped back down. 60m made it fine. Find it hard to believe they retroed a rout to the right and did not rig it for 60's?
I would have simply walked up to the guy and coached him through whatever was nessicary to get out of his situation.


jakedatc


Oct 11, 2012, 4:09 AM
Post #34 of 35 (4664 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [jt512] Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
or they could have just swung over 10' to the woods and walked down.

it amazes me people rappel Clippity.. it takes 5 minutes to walk down and much longer to rap.. Crazy

N00bs rap. You know that.

truth..


jakedatc


Oct 11, 2012, 4:13 AM
Post #35 of 35 (4662 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [tradmanclimbs] Near Miss at Rumney on Sunday [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

tradmanclimbs wrote:
I have only done clippity oce. Not familar with the terrain up there so I strapped a rope on my back and hiked up it and rapped back down. 60m made it fine. Find it hard to believe they retroed a rout to the right and did not rig it for 60's?
I would have simply walked up to the guy and coached him through whatever was nessicary to get out of his situation.

book says it takes 4 rappels to get down. i think if you go from just the first bolted anchor to the bottom you end up on this small "ledge" which is just a outcrop of the woods that you can walk down from. if they hadn't freaked out i bet they could have turned around and walked.. at the very least could have butt slid down. if it was not an exaggeration of 30' then they could have had 50m rope and came up way short.

If they were on lady and the tramp i'm not sure where you get with either length from P1 anchor..


(This post was edited by jakedatc on Oct 11, 2012, 4:25 AM)

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Accident and Incident Analysis

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook