|
Gmburns2000
Jun 12, 2014, 3:04 PM
Post #1 of 3
(4849 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
Change in land management = a chance in policies. Not that this directly affects climbers (now). but there are similarities.
Get your jumps in before it becomes official?
http://www.boston.com/...KD5ngODOL/story.html
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jun 12, 2014, 4:01 PM
Post #2 of 3
(4827 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
There are HEAPS of arches that are veiw-only, can't they leave just one for swinging?
I guess you could argue that Looking glass Arch has a swing, but that isn't actually on the arch so I don't reckon it counts.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Jun 12, 2014, 6:46 PM
Post #3 of 3
(4791 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
sungam wrote: There are HEAPS of arches that are veiw-only, can't they leave just one for swinging? I guess you could argue that Looking glass Arch has a swing, but that isn't actually on the arch so I don't reckon it counts.
Dunno. Corona Arch is a pretty majestic arch. I really enjoyed it. I think I thought about climbing for about 30 seconds before figuring it was better to look at it than to climb it.
However, as far as access goes, I understand the "swingers". It's not so close and not so far away either, so it would make a good swinging arch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
