|
trevor
Anonymous Poster
May 9, 2003, 12:45 AM
Post #1 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 11, 2006
Posts: 0
|
So we are now running this survey about whether or not the dynamic menu works or not and I am suprised at the number of people who say it doesn't work. It is supposed to work on almost all browsers. Could some of those people who have browsers that didn't work, please tell us what you are running? Netscape/MSIE? Version? Windows 95? Mac?
Also, I'd like to know what you meant by "didn't work." Did you find the page? Did you see a menu? Did the links not work? Did in not expand or collapse. Unfortunately I didn't have much room in the poll question to explain exactly what I was looking for in a response and what you "should" have seen.
In case you haven't voted, click here:
http://www.rockclimbing.com/polls/vote.php?pollID=47
Trevor
|
|
|
|
|
jhwnewengland
May 9, 2003, 12:51 AM
Post #2 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 2, 2002
Posts: 470
|
Doesn't work for me in Apple's new browser, Safari. The window doesn't expand. Works fine in Internet Explorer, but I don't use that.
|
|
|
|
|
renobdarb
May 9, 2003, 12:57 AM
Post #3 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2003
Posts: 393
|
I'm running latest version of Internet Explorer on PC... got zip-o on the menus... :(
-brad
|
|
|
|
|
voltzwgn
May 9, 2003, 1:01 AM
Post #4 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 14, 2002
Posts: 140
|
worked fine for me IE 6.0 sp1 on Win98, will try with XP later
|
|
|
|
|
sheldonjr
May 9, 2003, 1:15 AM
Post #5 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2003
Posts: 191
|
Workin great on Netscape 7.01 (expands, takes me to the pages) but the little plus minus box thingy's sometimes get messed up. (Don't appear.)
|
|
|
|
|
geckoee
May 9, 2003, 1:38 AM
Post #6 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2003
Posts: 99
|
Netscape 4.75 (the browser at work) didn't work. all of the menus appeared expanded, but would not "close up" No "-" button present
IE 5.50 works fine.
|
|
|
|
|
thegodfather
May 9, 2003, 1:55 AM
Post #7 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 200
|
dynamic menus? what?
|
|
|
|
|
mattiem
May 9, 2003, 3:23 AM
Post #8 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2002
Posts: 104
|
I am using Opera but not the latest version and i get absolutly nada
|
|
|
|
|
trevor
Anonymous Poster
May 9, 2003, 3:32 AM
Post #9 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 11, 2006
Posts: 0
|
Apparently this menu is supposed to work with:
Internet Explorer 4.0+
Netscape 4.7+
Mozilla 0.9+
Opera 7.0+
Safari is not supported right now.
We may have to have two versions. A simple menu for those poor souls that don't use one of the above versions and a dynamic one for everyone else.
It's just getting REALLY hard to create a menu structure that does the job.
|
|
|
|
|
tradkelly
May 9, 2003, 4:01 AM
Post #10 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 7, 2003
Posts: 278
|
Suggestion:
I was confused when I first saw the poll question, and the link. I moused over things, tooled around, got nothing. Then I pushed the link. Yeah, on that page, their dhtml or js worked (IE6.+whatever). Put in a snippet in that section or frame, or work in an IFRAME or something. Does it work? Well, not if someone doesn't leave the site to try it on someone else's site, and not if they don't have js enabled (on whatever version of whatever script lang their browser supports, if it's a js dyn menu). So, do some browser sniffing and put up an alternate that will, or state that it'll work with X versions and above but not whichever browsers won't! The approach to the question wasn't appropriate. Run a dozen different browser versions on your test nodes (ask some users, some of us webdev) and see what it looks like with screenshots or something. Not something you should ask 11,000+ users if it works with...
I'd use a framed js link page that expands as users push to expand sections, but it's not always considered good style. You're never going to be able to please all of the users, no matter what you do. Putting all of the links on the front page makes it too big, which I assume is what you're trying to get away from. Try four or five beta home pages with linked data instead of just the front (main, real) page, and ask for feedback, including bandwidth, OS, browser version, and results/opinions, and make a decision on it.
I'll use it nevertheless, whatever the interface. But then, I access usenet through a reader. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
tradkelly
May 9, 2003, 4:18 AM
Post #11 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 7, 2003
Posts: 278
|
Trevor,
After looking through the author's support info for it, build an alternate page with the script installed for the left-side menus, and put it up as /beta.html or something, and let us try it out. It looks decent and should be stable for most of your users. What the heck. Really, there's not more than an hour or so of coding to put up the alternate front page with all of the regular db links, is there? :) I'll be your huckleberry.
|
|
|
|
|
crack_climber
May 9, 2003, 4:25 AM
Post #12 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 4, 2003
Posts: 210
|
They worked fine for me and I am running Windows XP Professional Series and Internet Explorer 6.0.26
|
|
|
|
|
bsignorelli
May 10, 2003, 9:00 PM
Post #13 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 415
|
Works fine for me. I'm running...
Opera: Version 7.10
Build: 2840
Platform: Win32
System: Windows 2000
Java: Not installed
It also works in IE 6.0
|
|
|
|
|
hroldan
May 10, 2003, 9:21 PM
Post #14 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2002
Posts: 330
|
Hi there, it DIDN'T work on my Mac with Internet explorer 5. SOrry!!
|
|
|
|
|
freudian
May 14, 2003, 3:44 PM
Post #15 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 23, 2002
Posts: 236
|
I use OPERA Browser 7. It works fine with your treeview.
Andrew
|
|
|
|
|
pbjosh
May 14, 2003, 5:03 PM
Post #16 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 22, 2002
Posts: 1518
|
I wouldn't be surprised if people voted that it didn't work because of great distaste for dynamic menus. For what it's worth, I think dynamic menus just suck.
josh
|
|
|
|
|
orangekyak
May 14, 2003, 5:23 PM
Post #17 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 1832
|
In reply to: Try four or five beta home pages with linked data instead of just the front (main, real) page,
This is clearly an intelligent user with some design knowledge (I like this idea because I agree, and I've been suggesting this with little support).
Trevor, I'm going to make the bold statement (and you might know this already) that non-designers don't really know how to design a web page that KEEPS new users. The feedback you are getting is from established users who have been able to sift through the current design flaws of rc.com to find their "my rc.com" within the site's current jumbled configuration (which explains why you've had so many complaints when random features have gone down or been postponed).
It's great that you are getting feedback from these hardy folks, because you're doing a good job listening to your established audience. But when it comes to designing an interface that will get new users involved right away, you need to listen to designers and new users.
I'm hoping to do that mock-up I told you I'd do, but I'm so busy I will not get to until next week.
jeremy
|
|
|
|
|
climbersaurusrex
May 23, 2003, 6:59 AM
Post #18 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 23, 2002
Posts: 23
|
Well you can always sniff the browser's capabilities and do a little php magic... but that's always annoying
|
|
|
|
|
eric
May 24, 2003, 5:28 PM
Post #19 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 16, 2002
Posts: 1430
|
Seems like people have hyper-focused on the idea of "dynamic menus".
As someone who does, in part, user interface design and usability testing for a living I'd like to add that:
(a) dynamic menus only work for established/experienced users, not new users. New users consistently fail to navigate successfully. This is not true for applications that follow established patters, only websites.
(b) you will almost never get a comfortable interaction using just DHTML and JS. Timing issues, etc.
(c) you can do both -- organize it so that navigation works whether or not the menus do. I.E. it "de/up-grades" gracefully -- browsers that support it show a dynamic menu but others get passive navigation. But it's pretty damned rare to see anyone do this well.
(d) unless you spend ages doing (c) you alienate a percentage of users (like me) who insist on using their choice of browser.
There is a reason most very high-traffic sites avoid this kind of navigation. Years of testing have shown that the usability problems combined with the technical issues make it too difficult to manage. I've run my own usability tests (thinking that I might find a way) and come to the same conclusion...
I'm not saying it shouldn't ever be used, just that I think there are far easier, more manageable alternatives that would be more appropriate in this context.
Specifically I'm thinking of navigation that expands as you go into sections. E.g., At the top level you only see "Users", but when you go there you get more options. Pretty standard, examples everywhere. A lesson from Apple, etc.: Less is more. Too many options/links are confusing to users.
If anybody cares I'm quite happy to outline a navigation structure for RC.
|
|
|
|
|
ebrmusic
May 28, 2003, 12:43 PM
Post #20 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 27, 2003
Posts: 59
|
In regard to the earlier post about the menu's not working in safari: They do work in the newest version of safari (v74). I have also tried it in camino, formally chimera, and ie for mac. I like the idea of these menus, might clean up the nav a little.
|
|
|
|
|
bluelip
May 28, 2003, 2:37 PM
Post #21 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 23, 2003
Posts: 102
|
Whether or not they work, I would stay away from them. Maybe a better poll would be "Would you like rc.com to implement dynamic menus?" Having sub-menus hidden only adds to the confusion of newcomers and frustration of experienced users.
Mike Coles
'bluelip'
|
|
|
|
|
mathguyclimber
May 28, 2003, 5:36 PM
Post #22 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 3, 2003
Posts: 1
|
Works on Safari 1.0 B2.
|
|
|
|
|
orangekyak
May 28, 2003, 6:22 PM
Post #23 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 1832
|
Trevor, please listen to khanom. This dude clearly knows his stuff. If he's volunteering his expertise, please let him help.
|
|
|
|
|
ropeburn
Jun 4, 2003, 2:39 AM
Post #24 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 19, 2003
Posts: 594
|
IE 5.1 Macintosh displays your treeview correctly. But takes to long to load and like some other replies in this thread, I just don't like it.
|
|
|
|
|
fightlikeagirl
Jun 6, 2003, 4:11 AM
Post #25 of 38
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2002
Posts: 6
|
i have windows... but my computer's screwing around on me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
