Forums: Community: Campground:
Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Campground

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All


Partner tgreene


Sep 15, 2004, 8:47 PM
Post #26 of 93 (1646 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 22, 2003
Posts: 7267

Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
tgreene, word on the remington, thats a fine gun.
Thanks, but my recommendation was for the Ruger KM77VT. :mrgreen:


unabonger


Sep 15, 2004, 10:25 PM
Post #27 of 93 (1646 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 8, 2003
Posts: 2689

Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Thanks folks I've made a list and am going shopping. I like the looks of the Springfied Armory subcompact and the price seems reasonable, lists at <500 on the website. Probably wait on the rifle until the spring. That's when the shit usually hits the fan around here what with the warm weather and all. Just kidding I'll be using it for killing beer cans mostly.

A-Doggy


Partner euroford


Sep 16, 2004, 2:58 AM
Post #28 of 93 (1646 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 2913

Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

you've really shown to know your stuff, i own allot of guns, but i'm far from a pro. so i'll just add my points for the fun of it :)

In reply to:
I personally hate Glocks for a multitude of reasons.

my first gun is the sl-17c 9mm. i didn't really know what i was doing when i bought it, and i've thought many times about getting rid of it. it just wasn't what i really wanted to have when i got it. though i do say, it shoots nicely, its easy to maintain, its been 100% trouble free, and i've probobly put 3 times more rounds through it than anything else i own. its a great plinker and fun to play with, but 9mm is definitly not for home or personal self defence IMO and now that i know what i didn't know than i would have chosen several other guns over it. but, when i want to take somebody shooting who has never shot before this is the one i put in there hands. its easy to live with.

In reply to:
HK's are superior, but so are the prices.

yup. my usp .45 is a piece of art, hk's stuff is beyond top notch, end of story. my only problem, is that it feels just a touch big for my hand, but this is not really a problem, i think it is just simply a fairly big gun. if i had the money i would add the usp compact to my collection.

In reply to:
  • Ruger makes a damn fine, low budget firearm, but aside from upgrading the grips, WYSIWYG.

  • my sister just bought a ruger 9mm compact against my recomendation. she loves it, i think its just kinda 'okay'.

    In reply to:
  • Unless you are wanting a revolver, stay away from Smith & Wesson

  • this is the only point we really disagree on. i absolutly LOVE my .40 compact. it was a screaming good deal at about $350, it fits my hand like it was made for me and i shoot very well with it. when i lived in TX and could carry, it was my CC weapon of choice. its obviously not as nice of a piece of engineering as the HK, but its been realiable and well, it just fits me so i guess thats why i love it.


    epic_ed


    Sep 16, 2004, 3:29 AM
    Post #29 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 17, 2002
    Posts: 4724

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    I haven't owned a gun in years but recently have been looking around. A trusted friend and owner of a fire arms sales license highly recommends the Kahr k-9 and other models from their product line. I fired the k-9 and the smaller PM9 and PM40. All three were excellent with how they felt from a novice shooters' perspective. I'm strongly learning toward the PM40. Anyone know more about this manufacturer and the models I mentioned?

    http://www.kahr.com/front.html

    Ed


    Partner rockrat511


    Sep 16, 2004, 8:42 AM
    Post #30 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 5, 2004
    Posts: 1109

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    In reply to:
    tgreene, word on the remington, thats a fine gun.
    Thanks, but my recommendation was for the Ruger KM77VT. :mrgreen:
    You're right tgreene, I had a mind fart while typing. :oops:


    jono


    Sep 16, 2004, 11:44 PM
    Post #31 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 6, 2002
    Posts: 2067

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    the 1911 safety kicksass. i love that grip safety


    astroman


    Sep 16, 2004, 11:56 PM
    Post #32 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 20, 2004
    Posts: 17

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    Thanks for everyone's input. I'm looking seriously at the Sprinfield Armory XD .40 Cal. Found a dealer nearby selling it for $417.00

    Not sold yet, still want to check prices on Walther and Sig.

    http://www.springfield-armory.com/...xd-pistol/XD9301.jpg

    ADog


    Partner tgreene


    Sep 16, 2004, 11:59 PM
    Post #33 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Oct 22, 2003
    Posts: 7267

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    The XD is a Glock w/ a different label! :nono:


    jono


    Sep 17, 2004, 12:00 AM
    Post #34 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 6, 2002
    Posts: 2067

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    barrel is too short for my taste.


    fecalquisinart


    Sep 17, 2004, 12:04 AM
    Post #35 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Sep 7, 2004
    Posts: 188

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    Try the Glock Model 23 in .40sw. Medium sizeed frame and still holds 13+1.

    That being said, if the shit does hit the fan, I would stay with a military round(9mm/.45) and .223/.308 for rifle. Brass, primers, etc is easily come by and if things go into total anarchy the local NG Armory should have more than enough to resupply.


    shortfatoldguy


    Sep 17, 2004, 2:40 AM
    Post #36 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Nov 4, 2002
    Posts: 1694

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    The XD is a Glock w/ a different label! :nono:

    No, it's not! Ergonomics are better, internals are different.

    HS Produkt, the maker, hired a bunch of ex-Glock people to design this gun, and they did stuff, like the grip safety, that Glock wouldn't let them do.

    It's not a Glock! It's better than a Glock.


    jono


    Sep 17, 2004, 3:48 AM
    Post #37 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 6, 2002
    Posts: 2067

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    it still has a tiny barrel.


    astroman


    Sep 17, 2004, 12:34 PM
    Post #38 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 20, 2004
    Posts: 17

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    it still has a tiny barrel.

    Well yeah that's the idea, its a subcompact.

    AstroPup


    Partner tgreene


    Sep 17, 2004, 12:43 PM
    Post #39 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Oct 22, 2003
    Posts: 7267

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    It's not a Glock! It's better than a Glock.
    Anything is better than a Glock; including Raven, Jennings or HighPoint! :lol:

    Seriously though, while there obviously have been a few select changes, the basic premise is far to similar to be considered much of anything more than a Glock with refinements. Also, it's a very "blocky" gun, for something that has been designed as a sub-compact. Either the Beretta Cougar, the Taurus Millenium, or the Kel-Tec would be superior choices in the sub-compact category.

    I'll take a mid or full sized weapon any day! :wink:


    astroman


    Sep 17, 2004, 5:27 PM
    Post #40 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 20, 2004
    Posts: 17

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    I checked out the Taurus Millenium 9mm, wow its very lightwieght. Elegant lines, I might enjoy that with a nice Cabernet.

    Also its not my only gun purchase in the next year, I'll be getting a nice full sized 1911 also but now I want a compact.

    http://www.taurususa.com/imagesMain/H_111B3.jpg


    fecalquisinart


    Sep 17, 2004, 7:47 PM
    Post #41 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Sep 7, 2004
    Posts: 188

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    Anything is better than a Glock; including Raven, Jennings or HighPoint!

    Do you know anything about guns? You are kidding, right?


    Partner tgreene


    Sep 17, 2004, 7:52 PM
    Post #42 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Oct 22, 2003
    Posts: 7267

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    In reply to:
    Anything is better than a Glock; including Raven, Jennings or HighPoint!

    Do you know anything about guns? You are kidding, right?
    Having been a Class-III dealer for 4 years, I know FAR more about firearms than most. :wink:

    While my comment was obviously meant to be tongue-in-cheek, it doesn't change the fact that Glocks suck!


    shortfatoldguy


    Sep 17, 2004, 9:13 PM
    Post #43 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Nov 4, 2002
    Posts: 1694

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    Also, it's a very "blocky" gun, for something that has been designed as a sub-compact. Either the Beretta Cougar, the Taurus Millenium, or the Kel-Tec would be superior choices in the sub-compact category.

    I'll take a mid or full sized weapon any day! :wink:

    Yes, it is wide for a subcompact. That's why I have the Kel-Tec .380, but the Kel-Tec is a specialized gun that pushes the limits of reliability in order to achieve its small size. (Great little shooter, though. I can put all seven in the A zone of an IPDA target at seven yards as fast as I can work the trigger--not bad for a package that size.) In the XD, I have the 4" service model, which I like very much (obviously) and shoot well for how much I get to practice. For me, the Glock feels like a length of 2x4, very different from my XD.

    I think your unfavorable comparison of Glock with Jennings ought to be posted over on glocktalk... :lol:


    superdiamonddave


    Sep 17, 2004, 9:22 PM
    Post #44 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jul 11, 2002
    Posts: 443

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    My favorite pistol is the S & W .357 Mag. I took off the blocky wooden grips and put on Hogue combat grips. They set off the stainless steel nicely and fit my hand perfectly. Also, I had some radioactive night sites put on about 12 years ago and they are about used up, but I like them anyway. I will eventually get them replaced but they are pricey.

    A question for tgreene:

    I still have about 3 boxes of .357 Black Talon ammo that I bought years ago. Is the ammo legal to use? And also, what kind of life span does ammo have?

    Thanks in advance,
    Dave


    Partner tgreene


    Sep 17, 2004, 9:24 PM
    Post #45 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Oct 22, 2003
    Posts: 7267

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    I think your unfavorable comparison of Glock with Jennings ought to be posted over on glocktalk... :lol:
    Hey, I've yet to hear of a Jennings go KABOOM! :mrgreen:

    Glock designed the striker firing mechanism that I'm very fond of, but the safeties are a joke. I will say that Gaston Glock knows how to throw one a hell of a party though! (I crashed one 2 years ago in Vegas, during ShotShow) :wink:


    Partner tgreene


    Sep 17, 2004, 9:35 PM
    Post #46 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Oct 22, 2003
    Posts: 7267

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    A question for tgreene:

    I still have about 3 boxes of .357 Black Talon ammo that I bought years ago. Is the ammo legal to use? And also, what kind of life span does ammo have?

    Thanks in advance,
    Dave

    Black Talon is basically the exact same ammo as the current Winchester SXT (which replaced the BT's), but without the powder coating. They never were illegal, but due to the media hype which falsely referred to these as "cop killers", Olin/Winchester voluntarily stopped making them. There may have actually been certain municipalities such as San Francisco or Chicago that specifically outlawed them by name, but nothing was ever done on either a Federal or State level.

    Most modern ammo that is created w/ non-corrosive primers is good for 10-15 years minimum, before you'll notice any decrease in performance. As long as the casings show no signs of degradation, then the ammo should be fine. Being that the BT's used nickle plated casings, they will last longer than your typical brass.

    I've actually taken old ammo that was showing signs of mild corrosion and tossed it in a tumbler for a few minutes, to remove the "crud" and polish the cases, so they would feed and extract better. You have to be careful when tumbling live ammo though, since too much tumbling will eventually break down the powders, creating unsafe pressures.


    jeffers_mz


    Sep 18, 2004, 8:42 AM
    Post #47 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jul 11, 2002
    Posts: 357

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    Astro:

    It's been talked around, but not brought right up front, so I will.

    A buddy of mine, former Marine and avid pursuer of fine firearms, has a 15 round plus one up (he never packs the magazine full to reduce the chances of a jam due to spring softening) manufactured under license copy of a Browning 9mm. If I remember correctly, it was manufactured in South America and I believe it is a Targa or a Taurus.

    I mention it because it puts a lot of firepower and features that I believe meet your needs into your hands for much lower cost than anything else I've seen suggested here.

    IIRC, he paid around $300 for it, new.

    I don't see you worrying about 1" circles versus same hole accuracy for a while yet, but I do see you carefully balancing cost versus performance and with this weapon you gain in two ways, initial price, and continuing expense to practice with it.

    It's not going to knock down a charging bull at 50 paces, but are you really worried about charging bulls or about some idjit in your house at 10 feet?

    Since you're also looking into a long gun, I suspect the latter.

    Something else to consider in planning your arsenal, which one are you likely to be using, and of the others, which are going to be effective in someone else's hands?

    Having a full range of weapons will increase your versatility, but you can only shoot one at a time.

    For close range, with at least a little bit of room to swing it, it's hard to beat a short barreled 12 gauge for putting lead on target, no matter who's wielding it. Of course, you aren't going to be carrying it concealed.

    Tgreene,

    A while back, I used to shoot perfect using an Anschutz .22 match rifle at 50 feet, and I'm guessing I could hit a human target today at least out to three or four hundred yards, maybe more.

    If possible, I'd like to pick up a rifle that would not limit the long range accuracy I can muster, but that also shoot full automatic with minor modifications.

    Cartridge availability, and common usage/ easy availibility of the rifle is also a consideration.

    Know anything that fits within these two extremes, or would I be better off with two different rifles?


    Partner tgreene


    Sep 18, 2004, 4:13 PM
    Post #48 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Oct 22, 2003
    Posts: 7267

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    If I remember correctly, it was manufactured in South America and I believe it is a Targa or a Taurus.
    Excam/Targa is manufactured by FIE in Italy. Taurus was a Brazilian company for years, but is now in the US.

    In reply to:
    If possible, I'd like to pick up a rifle that would not limit the long range accuracy I can muster, but that also shoot full automatic with minor modifications.

    Cartridge availability, and common usage/ easy availibility of the rifle is also a consideration.

    Know anything that fits within these two extremes, or would I be better off with two different rifles?
    You have just stated your potential intent to commit a felony, therefore these types of questions cannot and will not be answered! :idea:


    jeffers_mz


    Sep 18, 2004, 6:24 PM
    Post #49 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jul 11, 2002
    Posts: 357

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    "You have just stated your potential intent to commit a felony"

    Decidedly not, leading to one of two conclusions.

    Either you simply aren't aware that I religiously follow the law, or else you are implying that an automatic weapon cannot be legally licensed unless it is purchased in that condition as opposed to being modified after the fact.

    I have no objection to dotting the legal i's and crossing the t's, however, I do not wish to be dependent on required parts from an obscure or overseas manufacturer, or on the availibility of a world class gunsmith when it's time to upgrade the weapon.

    If, however, after market auto's can't be licensed, then you have answered the question, indicating I need two different rifles to satisfy my objectives.


    Partner tgreene


    Sep 18, 2004, 7:59 PM
    Post #50 of 93 (1646 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Oct 22, 2003
    Posts: 7267

    Re: Sweet Spot for Price vs Performance of 9mm Semi? [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Can't Post

    Machineguns manufactured after May of 1986, cannot be licensed on a Form-4 for private ownership, and are restricted to Title-II/III dealers, law enforcement, military or other regulated government agencies.

    No machineguns can ever be legally manufactured, except by licensed Title-II manufacturers.

    If you want a machinegun; then save your pennies, deal with the red tape, and own them where legally allowed... They'll start at $2000 for junky bullet hoses, and can easily go upwards of $50,000 for a collectable. The "average" Form-4 weapon will run you just under $10k.

    Subguns NFA Classified Adds

    First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All

    Forums : Community : Campground

     


    Search for (options)

    Log In:

    Username:
    Password: Remember me:

    Go Register
    Go Lost Password?



    Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook