|
|
Forums:
Climbing Information:
Gear Heads:
Re: [dan2see] Three-point Equalette:
Edit Log
|
|
healyje
Mar 5, 2007, 5:21 PM
Views: 8677
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
Dan, now normally I don't make this sort of comment, but get a grip, dude - in 2006 you couldn't be bothered to read one of the more in-depth and interesting threads ever done on the subject as per your post back late last year:
In reply to: Well Smorg, if you know how to set-up the basic sliding-X, I'd say don't worry about all the pages and pages of opinions.
And then you post this thread, where you "explore" a poor extension (literally) of the sliding-X while apparently managing to confuse the use of the term "Equalette" given it is now commonly associated with a specific design which is not this one. For anyone who hasn't, please go back and read at least a few pages of the Sliding-X thread before posting/discussing stuff like this...
Bone up on the "Improved sliding x: Is it really safer?" thread here:
http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._reply;so=ASC;mh=25;
(This post was edited by healyje on Mar 5, 2007, 5:27 PM)
|
|
|
Edit Log:
|
|
Post edited by healyje
() on Mar 5, 2007, 5:24 PM
|
|
Post edited by healyje
() on Mar 5, 2007, 5:26 PM
|
|
Post edited by healyje
() on Mar 5, 2007, 5:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
