 |
Forums:
Climbing Information:
The Lab:
Re: [ja1484] Proposed Anchor Rigging:
Edit Log
|
|

knudenoggin
May 20, 2007, 5:57 PM
Views: 22550
Registered: May 6, 2004
Posts: 596
|
In reply to: Therefore, when it comes to wear and repeated lowering (meaning ropes running over the aluminum), you can expect it to wear and behave much like our oval would. This makes little sense: UNlike an oval 'biner, a ring has no set axis and thus can be rotated to distribute repeated loadings in different places (though I have seen some thin rings that became a bit oval, and hence held a particular position).
In reply to: Likewise, when using our Rap Rings, one must be careful not to apply simultaneous, multi-directional loading. In other words, put the load along one single axis. To load them otherwise is to weaken them. Just like a carabiner. Likewise, I remain unconvinced by this argument. Has anyone actually tested some sort of triaxial loading? In the particular case at hand, I'd think that any weakening would be slight, and beyond concern for the range of conceivable loads. *kN* ps: "Wootles drop-tests suggesting..." --huh? RGold, you're suffering forums daze: no "Wootles" here, though there is a poster of sterling qualifications as a tester!
(This post was edited by knudenoggin on May 20, 2007, 6:12 PM)
|
|
Edit Log:
|
Post edited by knudenoggin
() on May 20, 2007, 6:12 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|