|
USnavy
Mar 18, 2009, 4:50 AM
Post #1 of 83
(5502 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
I know it sounds elementary but I know some knots get stuck easier than others in RR. On Prince of Darkness and Unimpeachable Groping we will lead on a 10.5 and trail a 9.1 to rap off of. On all the other routes we will lead on two 9.1's. We intend to simulrap to save time if it’s getting dark. Generally I just use a figure eight (standard follow through figure eight, not the one sided figure eight bend) however I am a bit less sure of how a figure eight reacts to two different rope sizes and how easy a figure eight gets stuck out there. So I guess the question is, follow through figure eight, triple fishermans or EDK for different sized ropes? And if EDK is the best option should I use the follow through EDK (opposing tails) or the EDK bend (tails on the same side)?
(This post was edited by USnavy on Mar 18, 2009, 5:33 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Mar 18, 2009, 5:33 AM
Post #2 of 83
(5473 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
i only ever use an overhand for rappelling. i regularly rap on a 9.8/8.4 combo- pre-tension it well and leave about 12-18" of tail and you're good to go. personally, i think the 8 is too bulky, but i dont actually know anyone who uses it. be very careful simul-rapping if you havent done it before- it can save alot of time if done right, but can also be very dangerous if done wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Mar 18, 2009, 5:43 AM
Post #3 of 83
(5462 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
Do you recommend the bend: Or the follow through: It seems the follow through would be much stronger and safer then the bend variation.
|
|
|
|
|
andrewG
Mar 18, 2009, 5:58 AM
Post #4 of 83
(5443 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 5, 2008
Posts: 102
|
The bend. The follow through won't roll to go over an edge. Just make sure to set the knot well and leave long tails so the knot won't roll off the ends of the rope. The tails you have in your pictures are definitely insufficient to make me happy. Edit: I would call "the bend EDK" an EDK and the "follow through EDK" an overhand follow through.
(This post was edited by andrewG on Mar 18, 2009, 6:00 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
byran
Mar 18, 2009, 5:59 AM
Post #5 of 83
(5441 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2006
Posts: 266
|
I use the bend with a second overhand backing it up. It runs smoothly over the rock making it less likely to get snagged, and it's easy to untie after being weighted. Just be aware that it can walk after multiple rappels so make sure there's plenty of tail and a backup overhand is a good idea.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Mar 18, 2009, 5:59 AM
Post #6 of 83
(5439 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
bend (aka, edk)- fast and easy and more than strong enough for rappelling. it doesnt get caught up on protrusions. its important to pre-tension the knot and to make sure the tails are much longer than what is pictured.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Mar 18, 2009, 6:56 AM
Post #7 of 83
(5407 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
Would it be appropriate to back the knot up by tying the tails to the opposite rope with a triple fishermans? Or would that simply defeat the purpose of using the EDK to reduce the chance of the rope getting hung up? Or maybe should one back up it by tying the tails together with a fishermans?
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Mar 18, 2009, 7:12 AM
Post #8 of 83
(5397 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
USnavy wrote: Would it be appropriate to back the knot up by tying the tails to the opposite rope with a triple fishermans? Or would that simply defeat the purpose of using the EDK to reduce the chance of the rope getting hung up? Or maybe should one back up it by tying the tails together with a fishermans? it would defeat the purpose. to back it up, tie another knot snugged up against the first.
|
|
|
|
|
pyrosis
Mar 18, 2009, 7:42 AM
Post #9 of 83
(5381 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 150
|
I rapped off the bend/EDK the other day on a 10.5 lead and 8.0 tag line. It kind of freaked me out seeing ropes of two drastically different diameters tied in the EDK, but it was fine. Four double rope raps later and the tails were still the same length as when we started. I am curious though, is there a point when the ropes are too different and the EDK isn't reliable anymore? For example an 11 mm tied to a 7.8 mm or something? Anyone know?
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Mar 18, 2009, 7:54 AM
Post #10 of 83
(5373 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
If you're worried about the edk, tie another edk on top of it. No way in hell you're going to weigh enough to roll an edk over an edk. It should still stand up when you pull it so you it won't snag. I'm more concerned about the guy rapping the 9.1 single line.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Mar 18, 2009, 7:56 AM
Post #11 of 83
(5371 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
pyrosis wrote: I rapped off the bend/EDK the other day on a 10.5 lead and 8.0 tag line. It kind of freaked me out seeing ropes of two drastically different diameters tied in the EDK, but it was fine. Four double rope raps later and the tails were still the same length as when we started. I am curious though, is there a point when the ropes are too different and the EDK isn't reliable anymore? For example an 11 mm tied to a 7.8 mm or something? Anyone know? And then ask yourself: "What if the ropes are wet?" Jay
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Mar 18, 2009, 9:34 AM
Post #12 of 83
(5355 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
USnavy wrote: Would it be appropriate to back the knot up by tying the tails to the opposite rope with a triple fishermans? Or would that simply defeat the purpose of using the EDK to reduce the chance of the rope getting hung up? Or maybe should one back up it by tying the tails together with a fishermans? Normally i am not the one to start bashing people, and shouting around "STFU n00b", but this "idea" along with a few others of your recent statements gets me on the verge of doing so. But this time it is just a friendly suggestion: Maybe you should brush up on some of your basic climbing skills, before asking all kinds of questions. Read a few books, go out with someone experienced, or take a course. Of course you can tie a backup to an EDK (and under certain conditions, ie. very different rope diameters you should), but if you make a giantic clusterfuck that totally defeats the purpose of using an overhand then you should rethink your approach. As others have said: If you want to avoid snagging as much as possible, use an overhand (EDK). Always give it long tails! and if the ropes are very different, put another overhand directly on top of it. qwert
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Mar 18, 2009, 9:38 AM
Post #13 of 83
(5355 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
andrewG wrote: The bend. The follow through won't roll to go over an edge. Just make sure to set the knot well and leave long tails so the knot won't roll off the ends of the rope. The tails you have in your pictures are definitely insufficient to make me happy. Edit: I would call "the bend EDK" an EDK and the "follow through EDK" an overhand follow through.
byran wrote: I use the bend with a second overhand backing it up. It runs smoothly over the rock making it less likely to get snagged, and it's easy to untie after being weighted. Just be aware that it can walk after multiple rappels so make sure there's plenty of tail and a backup overhand is a good idea. I hope you guys realise that the figure-8 bend is NEVER a good knot to join ropes. It rolls far worse than a single overhand bend (AKA EDK). There is no reason to use it and it is dangerous. Use a follow through, EDK or a fishermans.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Mar 18, 2009, 10:00 AM
Post #14 of 83
(5348 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
patto wrote: andrewG wrote: The bend. The follow through won't roll to go over an edge. Just make sure to set the knot well and leave long tails so the knot won't roll off the ends of the rope. The tails you have in your pictures are definitely insufficient to make me happy. Edit: I would call "the bend EDK" an EDK and the "follow through EDK" an overhand follow through. byran wrote: I use the bend with a second overhand backing it up. It runs smoothly over the rock making it less likely to get snagged, and it's easy to untie after being weighted. Just be aware that it can walk after multiple rappels so make sure there's plenty of tail and a backup overhand is a good idea. I hope you guys realise that the figure-8 bend is NEVER a good knot to join ropes. It rolls far worse than a single overhand bend (AKA EDK). There is no reason to use it and it is dangerous. Use a follow through, EDK or a fishermans. It’s a poor knot to use when you tie it in a bend formation. When you use it in a follow through formation, its bomber. In all cases the rope will break before the knot will slips when tied in the follow through formation.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Mar 18, 2009, 10:13 AM
Post #15 of 83
(5345 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
USnavy wrote: It’s a poor knot to use when you tie it in a bend formation. When you use it in a follow through formation, its bomber. In all cases the rope will break before the knot will slips when tied in the follow through formation. Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Mar 18, 2009, 10:38 AM
Post #16 of 83
(5329 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
Hrrmmm... I think I found a video of the EDK capsizing. http://www.youtube.com/...569E8750&index=2 0:49. Is that the EDK? It looks like it. Hard to tell from the side though.
(This post was edited by USnavy on Mar 18, 2009, 10:38 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
epoch
Moderator
Mar 18, 2009, 12:01 PM
Post #17 of 83
(5308 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163
|
USnavy wrote: I know it sounds elementary but I know some knots get stuck easier than others in RR. On Prince of Darkness and Unimpeachable Groping we will lead on a 10.5 and trail a 9.1 to rap off of. On all the other routes we will lead on two 9.1's. We intend to simulrap to save time if it’s getting dark. Generally I just use a figure eight (standard follow through figure eight, not the one sided figure eight bend) however I am a bit less sure of how a figure eight reacts to two different rope sizes and how easy a figure eight gets stuck out there. So I guess the question is, follow through figure eight, triple fishermans or EDK for different sized ropes? And if EDK is the best option should I use the follow through EDK (opposing tails) or the EDK bend (tails on the same side)? Buahahahahahahaha... Our resident self-proclaimed hotshot know-it-all bestest climber in Hawaii didn't just ask this, did he? I hope you epic.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Mar 18, 2009, 12:23 PM
Post #18 of 83
(5290 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
It most definately is. The first knot is a EDK and the second is a figure 8 bend. I know which one I'd prefer.
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
Mar 18, 2009, 1:15 PM
Post #19 of 83
(5252 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
epoch wrote: USnavy wrote: I know it sounds elementary but I know some knots get stuck easier than others in RR. On Prince of Darkness and Unimpeachable Groping we will lead on a 10.5 and trail a 9.1 to rap off of. On all the other routes we will lead on two 9.1's. We intend to simulrap to save time if it’s getting dark. Generally I just use a figure eight (standard follow through figure eight, not the one sided figure eight bend) however I am a bit less sure of how a figure eight reacts to two different rope sizes and how easy a figure eight gets stuck out there. So I guess the question is, follow through figure eight, triple fishermans or EDK for different sized ropes? And if EDK is the best option should I use the follow through EDK (opposing tails) or the EDK bend (tails on the same side)? Buahahahahahahaha... Our resident self-proclaimed hotshot know-it-all bestest climber in Hawaii didn't just ask this, did he? I hope you epic. Hey Epoch- I've had VERY similar thoughts while following USN's attempt to plan out this trip on the knob. While reading the betting thread with regards to the cam competition, I had a thought But I wanted to air it before I gotted the BANZ. Would it be "banzable" ('case I'm pretty sure it IS in poor taste ) to set up a thread where we take bets on what climb and how long USN's epic will take place on his trip to RR's ???!?!?!?! I'd be willing to put something up as a prize, too!
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Mar 18, 2009, 2:01 PM
Post #20 of 83
(5209 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
I wouldn't wish an epic on my worst enemy.
|
|
|
|
|
jrathfon
Mar 18, 2009, 2:24 PM
Post #21 of 83
(5188 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494
|
j_ung wrote: I wouldn't wish an epic on my worst enemy. How about a mini-epic? e.g. stuck ropes, bail in the rain, benighting...
|
|
|
|
|
andrewG
Mar 18, 2009, 3:16 PM
Post #22 of 83
(5140 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 5, 2008
Posts: 102
|
jrathfon wrote: j_ung wrote: I wouldn't wish an epic on my worst enemy. How about a mini-epic? e.g. stuck ropes, bail in the rain, benighting... I've learned a lot from every epic I've been through. I wouldn't wish an injury laden epic on anyone, but the occasional epic is a good thing IMHO. Just makes the post climb beers that much better.
|
|
|
|
|
moose_droppings
Mar 18, 2009, 3:55 PM
Post #23 of 83
(5104 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371
|
Isn't what your calling a "follow through", actually a water knot? Or is the water knot just a name given to an overhand follow through? Incidentally, I asked Arick way back when he started the 'break things' thread if he'd try breaking a simple water knot made up with some 7mm perlon, or if anyone knew of some data on that. edit: After reading my own question my bet would be a water knot is just a name given to an overhand follow through.
(This post was edited by moose_droppings on Mar 18, 2009, 3:59 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Mar 18, 2009, 5:06 PM
Post #24 of 83
(5067 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
j_ung wrote: I wouldn't wish an epic on my worst enemy. On the other hand, USN probably isn't your worst enemy. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
Sin
Mar 18, 2009, 6:29 PM
Post #25 of 83
(5041 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 236
|
altelis wrote: epoch wrote: USnavy wrote: I know it sounds elementary but I know some knots get stuck easier than others in RR. On Prince of Darkness and Unimpeachable Groping we will lead on a 10.5 and trail a 9.1 to rap off of. On all the other routes we will lead on two 9.1's. We intend to simulrap to save time if it’s getting dark. Generally I just use a figure eight (standard follow through figure eight, not the one sided figure eight bend) however I am a bit less sure of how a figure eight reacts to two different rope sizes and how easy a figure eight gets stuck out there. So I guess the question is, follow through figure eight, triple fishermans or EDK for different sized ropes? And if EDK is the best option should I use the follow through EDK (opposing tails) or the EDK bend (tails on the same side)? Buahahahahahahaha... Our resident self-proclaimed hotshot know-it-all bestest climber in Hawaii didn't just ask this, did he? I hope you epic. Hey Epoch- I've had VERY similar thoughts while following USN's attempt to plan out this trip on the knob. While reading the betting thread with regards to the cam competition, I had a thought But I wanted to air it before I gotted the BANZ. Would it be "banzable" ('case I'm pretty sure it IS in poor taste ) to set up a thread where we take bets on what climb and how long USN's epic will take place on his trip to RR's ???!?!?!?! I'd be willing to put something up as a prize, too! You'd have to add a "no go" option. It would be so funny if USN went through all this planning and posting, and never ended up going. I think most of the climbers in the states, know where USN is going to be pretty soon.
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Mar 18, 2009, 7:28 PM
Post #26 of 83
(4384 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
Sin wrote: altelis wrote: epoch wrote: USnavy wrote: I know it sounds elementary but I know some knots get stuck easier than others in RR. On Prince of Darkness and Unimpeachable Groping we will lead on a 10.5 and trail a 9.1 to rap off of. On all the other routes we will lead on two 9.1's. We intend to simulrap to save time if it’s getting dark. Generally I just use a figure eight (standard follow through figure eight, not the one sided figure eight bend) however I am a bit less sure of how a figure eight reacts to two different rope sizes and how easy a figure eight gets stuck out there. So I guess the question is, follow through figure eight, triple fishermans or EDK for different sized ropes? And if EDK is the best option should I use the follow through EDK (opposing tails) or the EDK bend (tails on the same side)? Buahahahahahahaha... Our resident self-proclaimed hotshot know-it-all bestest climber in Hawaii didn't just ask this, did he? I hope you epic. Hey Epoch- I've had VERY similar thoughts while following USN's attempt to plan out this trip on the knob. While reading the betting thread with regards to the cam competition, I had a thought But I wanted to air it before I gotted the BANZ. Would it be "banzable" ('case I'm pretty sure it IS in poor taste ) to set up a thread where we take bets on what climb and how long USN's epic will take place on his trip to RR's ???!?!?!?! I'd be willing to put something up as a prize, too! You'd have to add a "no go" option. It would be so funny if USN went through all this planning and posting, and never ended up going. I think most of the climbers in the states, know where USN is going to be pretty soon. The thing to do would be to cockblock the two climbs he just mentioned. Ironically, I just rapped POD this last weekend and we had our ropes get stuck... twice. We used an EDK but both incidents had nothing to do with the joining knot. I don't want to be a spoiler, but I'll advise our hot shot resident trad expert to bring prussics [winkyface].
|
|
|
|
|
rgold
Mar 18, 2009, 7:47 PM
Post #27 of 83
(4372 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804
|
The overhand (AKA Euro Death Knot) is the way to go in Red Rocks. Tying with different-sized ropes is fine, but you should form the knot so that the fatter rope does extra duty in roll prevention: The way you check that you've got it right is to pull the two long strands apart---the first thing they encounter upon entering the knot should be a turn of the thinner rope. For extra security (not normally necessary but perhaps not a bad idea for simul raps) the backup should be tied so as to cut off possible rolling slack: Note that the tails in the photos were tied short for illustration purposes. When you tie the knot for real, the tails should be about the length of your forearm.
|
|
|
|
|
jamincan
Mar 18, 2009, 7:51 PM
Post #28 of 83
(4369 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2007
Posts: 207
|
I'm by no means an expert on knots, but I've always understood the water knot refers to an overhand follow through tied in webbing.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Mar 19, 2009, 4:23 AM
Post #29 of 83
(4308 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
rgold wrote: The overhand (AKA Euro Death Knot) is the way to go in Red Rocks. Tying with different-sized ropes is fine, but you should form the knot so that the fatter rope does extra duty in roll prevention: [img]http://usera.ImageCave.com/rgold/Technical/EDK2Dia1.jpg[/img] The way you check that you've got it right is to pull the two long strands apart---the first thing they encounter upon entering the knot should be a turn of the thinner rope. For extra security (not normally necessary but perhaps not a bad idea for simul raps) the backup should be tied so as to cut off possible rolling slack: [img]http://usera.ImageCave.com/rgold/Technical/EDK2Dia2.jpg[/img] Note that the tails in the photos were tied short for illustration purposes. When you tie the knot for real, the tails should be about the length of your forearm. Nice info, thanks. If I may ask, why do you prefer to tie an overhand knot in the smaller rope as a backup opposed to tying a second EDK against the first one? Is it simply because you wish to minimize the size of the knot or does your method provide a better backup then a second EDK?
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Mar 19, 2009, 4:38 AM
Post #30 of 83
(4303 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
zeke_sf wrote: Ironically, I just rapped POD this last weekend and we had our ropes get stuck... twice. We used an EDK but both incidents had nothing to do with the joining knot. I, too, had our ropes get stuck rapping in RR - Dark Shadows, specifically - that had nothing to do with the kind of knot we used. In fact, had anyone told us ahead of time how our ropes would get stuck, I'd have never believed them.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Mar 19, 2009, 6:07 AM
Post #31 of 83
(4300 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
i should point out that while using the EDK in RR will help alleviate stuck ropes, it will by no means eliminate it altogether. once piece of advice for folks climbing here- pay close attention to what side of the anchor the knot is on (the pull side)- that is, what direction you want the ropes to fall and where that knot is going to go when you start pulling. i personally think you should do this anyway, but its especially important here. an extra 30 seconds figuring this out can save you an hour or more later on.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Mar 19, 2009, 6:13 AM
Post #32 of 83
(4297 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
USnavy wrote: I know it sounds elementary but I know some knots get stuck easier than others in RR. On Prince of Darkness and Unimpeachable Groping we will lead on a 10.5 and trail a 9.1 to rap off of. On all the other routes we will lead on two 9.1's. We intend to simulrap to save time if it’s getting dark. Generally I just use a figure eight (standard follow through figure eight, not the one sided figure eight bend) however I am a bit less sure of how a figure eight reacts to two different rope sizes and how easy a figure eight gets stuck out there. So I guess the question is, follow through figure eight, triple fishermans or EDK for different sized ropes? And if EDK is the best option should I use the follow through EDK (opposing tails) or the EDK bend (tails on the same side)? USN, with all this hand wringing about what knot to use to minimize the rope getting stuck, do you know how to safely get your rope down if it does get stuck? Jay
(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 19, 2009, 6:13 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
climbinginchico
Mar 19, 2009, 6:34 AM
Post #33 of 83
(4291 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 3032
|
You're kidding, right Jay? Right?
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Mar 19, 2009, 6:37 AM
Post #34 of 83
(4288 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
climbinginchico wrote: You're kidding, right Jay? Right? Uh, no. Why would you think I'm kidding? Jay
|
|
|
|
|
climbinginchico
Mar 19, 2009, 6:40 AM
Post #35 of 83
(4285 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 3032
|
As in, you think there's actually a chance he knows how to self rescue?
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Mar 19, 2009, 6:49 AM
Post #36 of 83
(4284 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
climbinginchico wrote: As in, you think there's actually a chance he knows how to self rescue? In all seriousness, I don't know; and believe it or not, I was actually trying to be helpful. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
climbinginchico
Mar 19, 2009, 7:08 AM
Post #37 of 83
(4279 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 3032
|
jt512 wrote: climbinginchico wrote: As in, you think there's actually a chance he knows how to self rescue? In all seriousness, I don't know; and believe it or not, I was actually trying to be helpful. Jay I know. Maybe he should be asking about how to save himself. You know, just in case.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Mar 19, 2009, 7:32 AM
Post #38 of 83
(4278 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
jt512 wrote: USnavy wrote: I know it sounds elementary but I know some knots get stuck easier than others in RR. On Prince of Darkness and Unimpeachable Groping we will lead on a 10.5 and trail a 9.1 to rap off of. On all the other routes we will lead on two 9.1's. We intend to simulrap to save time if it’s getting dark. Generally I just use a figure eight (standard follow through figure eight, not the one sided figure eight bend) however I am a bit less sure of how a figure eight reacts to two different rope sizes and how easy a figure eight gets stuck out there. So I guess the question is, follow through figure eight, triple fishermans or EDK for different sized ropes? And if EDK is the best option should I use the follow through EDK (opposing tails) or the EDK bend (tails on the same side)? USN, with all this hand wringing about what knot to use to minimize the rope getting stuck, do you know how to safely get your rope down if it does get stuck? Jay Well it depends on the situation. If there is enough rope left I can simply relead the pitch. If there is not enough rope left to do a normal free climb lead I can do a roped solo lead with two locking biners and a clove hitch. If both ends of the rope are still at the belay station I can ascend the line with cordlet tied in a prussic or slings with a climbheist. If there is not enough rope to relead the pitch normally, I can also use a prussic or GriGri to climb the rope in a roped solo mode as opposed to the double carabiner and clove hitch method (assuming the other end of the rope can be tied down and assuming the rope is still running through the rap ring). Ultimately I would choose the roped solo lead last for I have never done one before and I know its risky and I am fairly sure its a bitch to get the clove hitch to pass rope as you climb. So my first option would be to relead the pitch if I could. If not, I would assend the line if I can get to both ropes. If not my last option would be to do a roped solo lead. But I guess the largest problem would be determining if there is enough rope left to reach the problem site and free the rope via a standard relead. Because after all if I started to relead the pitch and there was not enough rope to get there I would have no way back down accept to down climb and remove gear as I go. I would imagen the nice thing about doing a roped solo lead is that I could lead on the rope that is stuck and as long as the rope is not stuck very far off route, I can’t run out of rope. But I don’t really like roped solo leads so I would probably try something a bit less extreme first, if possible. I think it’s fairly improbable that the rope will get caught on something before it pulls through the rings. I think the most probable situation would be that the rope gets caught on something as it pulls through the ring and starts to fall. If that is the case a standard relead would probably be a viable option for I would likely have a good length of rope in my hand. If it’s not, a roped solo lead would be the only other option that I can think of that is not insanely dangerous. If worse comes to worse I can cut the rope which will greatly increase my options. If the rope got stuck on the way down I would likely have a good 50m or more of rope accessible to me (unless it got stuck dead in the middle of the rope). Although I can only use half that with a standard relead, I can use all 50m (or whatever length is accessible to me) if I cut the rope at the belay station and re join the ropes when I get to the top and free the stuck end. Furthermore, the cut rope may be long enough for me to do half raps on gear to the ground if I am only one or two pitches from the ground. That would of course involve leaving gear but it would eliminate the need to go back up to free the stuck rope.
(This post was edited by USnavy on Mar 19, 2009, 7:45 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
colatownkid
Mar 19, 2009, 1:10 PM
Post #39 of 83
(4250 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2007
Posts: 512
|
USnavy wrote: jt512 wrote: USnavy wrote: I know it sounds elementary but I know some knots get stuck easier than others in RR. On Prince of Darkness and Unimpeachable Groping we will lead on a 10.5 and trail a 9.1 to rap off of. On all the other routes we will lead on two 9.1's. We intend to simulrap to save time if it’s getting dark. Generally I just use a figure eight (standard follow through figure eight, not the one sided figure eight bend) however I am a bit less sure of how a figure eight reacts to two different rope sizes and how easy a figure eight gets stuck out there. So I guess the question is, follow through figure eight, triple fishermans or EDK for different sized ropes? And if EDK is the best option should I use the follow through EDK (opposing tails) or the EDK bend (tails on the same side)? USN, with all this hand wringing about what knot to use to minimize the rope getting stuck, do you know how to safely get your rope down if it does get stuck? Jay Well it depends on the situation. If there is enough rope left I can simply relead the pitch. If there is not enough rope left to do a normal free climb lead I can do a roped solo lead with two locking biners and a clove hitch. If both ends of the rope are still at the belay station I can ascend the line with cordlet tied in a prussic or slings with a climbheist. If there is not enough rope to relead the pitch normally, I can also use a prussic or GriGri to climb the rope in a roped solo mode as opposed to the double carabiner and clove hitch method (assuming the other end of the rope can be tied down and assuming the rope is still running through the rap ring). Ultimately I would choose the roped solo lead last for I have never done one before and I know its risky and I am fairly sure its a bitch to get the clove hitch to pass rope as you climb. So my first option would be to relead the pitch if I could. If not, I would assend the line if I can get to both ropes. If not my last option would be to do a roped solo lead. But I guess the largest problem would be determining if there is enough rope left to reach the problem site and free the rope via a standard relead. Because after all if I started to relead the pitch and there was not enough rope to get there I would have no way back down accept to down climb and remove gear as I go. I would imagen the nice thing about doing a roped solo lead is that I could lead on the rope that is stuck and as long as the rope is not stuck very far off route, I can’t run out of rope. But I don’t really like roped solo leads so I would probably try something a bit less extreme first, if possible. I think it’s fairly improbable that the rope will get caught on something before it pulls through the rings. I think the most probable situation would be that the rope gets caught on something as it pulls through the ring and starts to fall. If that is the case a standard relead would probably be a viable option for I would likely have a good length of rope in my hand. If it’s not, a roped solo lead would be the only other option that I can think of that is not insanely dangerous. If worse comes to worse I can cut the rope which will greatly increase my options. If the rope got stuck on the way down I would likely have a good 50m or more of rope accessible to me (unless it got stuck dead in the middle of the rope). Although I can only use half that with a standard relead, I can use all 50m (or whatever length is accessible to me) if I cut the rope at the belay station and re join the ropes when I get to the top and free the stuck end. Furthermore, the cut rope may be long enough for me to do half raps on gear to the ground if I am only one or two pitches from the ground. That would of course involve leaving gear but it would eliminate the need to go back up to free the stuck rope. Navy, that's a pretty fair assessment of the situation. I might add a couple things, though. Be extraordinarily careful about pulling the end of the rope through the rings. You want the rope to clear the rings cleanly, without getting caught on any features, especially things far to one side or the other. as VTG mentioned, figuring out which side of the rope should be the pull side based on the surrounding features is a good call. also, be super careful about what you're doing with the end of the rope you're pulling on. likely, you're going to just feed it right back through the rings and let it drop. however, in a place like red rocks where ropes are particularly snag-prone, you want to make sure your rope won't get caught on anything pulling it back up. if the top of your rope gets caught, you'll naturally pull the bottom back up to re-lead on that end. but if the bottom of the rope is also stuck in a crack, etc., you'll have to rap down to clear the end and then ascend back up before you can re-lead. of course, if it's stuck so hard you have to cut it to free the end, you may be left with a lot less rope than you thought. in that case, you may be looking at ascending the stuck line on prussiks, which is pretty undesirable (at least in my view). finally, when you're tossing your ropes for the next rappel, you might save yourself a lot of hassle in the long-run if you rappel "saddle bag" style and feed the rope out as you go instead of tossing the rope.
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
Mar 19, 2009, 1:20 PM
Post #40 of 83
(4248 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
Hey man, something to keep in mind when considering how you would get out of a stuck rap-rope situation, is whether the rap route is the same as the climbing route, the same as another route (is it within your lead abilities), or is it simply down the most direct plumb line thats really not climbable/protectable at all. The three different possibilities lead to very different solutions, eh? Also, I think you're making a good choice with going with two leadable lines. In most multipitch situations I climb on a 7 mm tag line and my lead line. That said, I pretty much always use two leadable lines in RR. For me, since I have 8 mm doubles I usually either just use my double ropes. If the route doesn't really dictate double technique I'll use my 10.2 lead line and bring one of the 8mm doubles as a tag line (or stuffed into a pack) for the rappels. I find this saves me tons of time seeing as I climb much faster and can change over belays much faster like this. I would recommend that unless the climb is SERIOUSLY wandering or the pro is seriously sketchy (which I don't think your are going to be seeing given your climbs) trailing one of the Jokers. I think you'll find the savings in rope management time is well worth it. If the pro is moderately wandering just bring extra double length slings for extending long and go with that. My experience is that when getting into the multipitch world the more you can do to simplify and stream-line your process the better. The thing that, at least in the beginning, caused me to have to break out the headlamps unexpectedly, was taking too long. Clusterfucks at the anchors, route-finding issues, etc. The more simple the techniques you choose in the beginning the better. Pick routes that can best accommodate these techniques. Once you feel better about your skills and want to start adding tricks you can start eying different routes that need those skills. YMMV.
|
|
|
|
|
mojomonkey
Mar 19, 2009, 3:21 PM
Post #41 of 83
(4219 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869
|
colatownkid wrote: Navy, that's a pretty fair assessment of the situation. I might add a couple things, though. Be extraordinarily careful about pulling the end of the rope through the rings. You want the rope to clear the rings cleanly, without getting caught on any features, especially things far to one side or the other. as VTG mentioned, figuring out which side of the rope should be the pull side based on the surrounding features is a good call. also, be super careful about what you're doing with the end of the rope you're pulling on. likely, you're going to just feed it right back through the rings and let it drop. however, in a place like red rocks where ropes are particularly snag-prone, you want to make sure your rope won't get caught on anything pulling it back up. if the top of your rope gets caught, you'll naturally pull the bottom back up to re-lead on that end. but if the bottom of the rope is also stuck in a crack, etc., you'll have to rap down to clear the end and then ascend back up before you can re-lead. of course, if it's stuck so hard you have to cut it to free the end, you may be left with a lot less rope than you thought. in that case, you may be looking at ascending the stuck line on prussiks, which is pretty undesirable (at least in my view). finally, when you're tossing your ropes for the next rappel, you might save yourself a lot of hassle in the long-run if you rappel "saddle bag" style and feed the rope out as you go instead of tossing the rope. That last suggestion can save a lot of hassle if it is windy.
|
|
|
|
|
colatownkid
Mar 19, 2009, 3:32 PM
Post #42 of 83
(4207 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2007
Posts: 512
|
altelis wrote: Hey man, something to keep in mind when considering how you would get out of a stuck rap-rope situation, is whether the rap route is the same as the climbing route, the same as another route (is it within your lead abilities), or is it simply down the most direct plumb line thats really not climbable/protectable at all. The three different possibilities lead to very different solutions, eh? Also, I think you're making a good choice with going with two leadable lines. In most multipitch situations I climb on a 7 mm tag line and my lead line. That said, I pretty much always use two leadable lines in RR. For me, since I have 8 mm doubles I usually either just use my double ropes. If the route doesn't really dictate double technique I'll use my 10.2 lead line and bring one of the 8mm doubles as a tag line (or stuffed into a pack) for the rappels. I find this saves me tons of time seeing as I climb much faster and can change over belays much faster like this. I would recommend that unless the climb is SERIOUSLY wandering or the pro is seriously sketchy (which I don't think your are going to be seeing given your climbs) trailing one of the Jokers. I think you'll find the savings in rope management time is well worth it. If the pro is moderately wandering just bring extra double length slings for extending long and go with that. My experience is that when getting into the multipitch world the more you can do to simplify and stream-line your process the better. The thing that, at least in the beginning, caused me to have to break out the headlamps unexpectedly, was taking too long. Clusterfucks at the anchors, route-finding issues, etc. The more simple the techniques you choose in the beginning the better. Pick routes that can best accommodate these techniques. Once you feel better about your skills and want to start adding tricks you can start eying different routes that need those skills. YMMV. also good points. along the same lines, speed is everything in multipitch. it's rarely the climbing that slows you down--it's the time spent at the anchor. building it, gear change-overs, drinking, eating, digging around in your pack for [insert tiny thing that you just need to have right now], etc. my recommendation would be to practice building anchors that are absolutely bomber as quickly as possible. (no need to rush, but when you get to the ledge, you shouldn't waste time trying to figure out where to put the thing. it should be almost instinctual.) also, you can circumvent many of the other issues by use a plaquette or other self-locking device to belay. you can eat, dig through your pack, etc. while bringing up the second, not when he/she is already there. finally, for the gear change-over, if you're using a sling, for the love of god, don't drop the thing. if you're racking off your harness, just clip each individual piece to each other's safety leash to avoid dropping anything. and in both cases, try to re-rack in an organized fashion as you clean the pitch to save time at the belay.
|
|
|
|
|
colatownkid
Mar 19, 2009, 3:35 PM
Post #43 of 83
(4201 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2007
Posts: 512
|
mojomonkey wrote: colatownkid wrote: Navy, that's a pretty fair assessment of the situation. I might add a couple things, though. Be extraordinarily careful about pulling the end of the rope through the rings. You want the rope to clear the rings cleanly, without getting caught on any features, especially things far to one side or the other. as VTG mentioned, figuring out which side of the rope should be the pull side based on the surrounding features is a good call. also, be super careful about what you're doing with the end of the rope you're pulling on. likely, you're going to just feed it right back through the rings and let it drop. however, in a place like red rocks where ropes are particularly snag-prone, you want to make sure your rope won't get caught on anything pulling it back up. if the top of your rope gets caught, you'll naturally pull the bottom back up to re-lead on that end. but if the bottom of the rope is also stuck in a crack, etc., you'll have to rap down to clear the end and then ascend back up before you can re-lead. of course, if it's stuck so hard you have to cut it to free the end, you may be left with a lot less rope than you thought. in that case, you may be looking at ascending the stuck line on prussiks, which is pretty undesirable (at least in my view). finally, when you're tossing your ropes for the next rappel, you might save yourself a lot of hassle in the long-run if you rappel "saddle bag" style and feed the rope out as you go instead of tossing the rope. That last suggestion can save a lot of hassle if it is windy. one more thing: in regards to that last suggestion, if you're wearing a pack, the pack can be substituted for saddle bags, if appropriate. be safe and don't get in over your head. (well, not too much anyway.) in my experience, jumping into the shallow end and seeing how long you can keep your head under water has a lot less potential for drowning than dropping into the deep end with cinder blocks tied to your feet. have fun.
|
|
|
|
|
rgold
Mar 19, 2009, 3:39 PM
Post #44 of 83
(4199 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804
|
USNavy wrote: Why do you prefer to tie an overhand knot in the smaller rope as a backup opposed to tying a second EDK against the first one? Is it simply because you wish to minimize the size of the knot or does your method provide a better backup then a second EDK? The primary concern is not to make a bigger knot, and the small additional overhand is good enough. Many people have pointed out that no knot by itself is going to prevent a rope from getting stuck. The knot itself can still get caught somewhere, and other parts of the rope can hang up too. I've had an free end hang up more than once; it is really amazing how an end can whip around and somehow lock behind a flake or around a small bush. VTG mentioned thinking about what side of the anchor the rope pulls from. This is particularly important if there is a crack system off to one side that the falling rope might stack itself into, something you'd prefer to avoid if possible. But at Red Rocks, the rope can also get stuck in the middle of a "blank" slab, so you can never be sure you won't have a problem. Something else you can do to help matters, if you can develop the appropriate coordination, is to fling the pulled rope outward just as it comes loose from the anchor, with the goal of making it fall free rather than slither down a less than vertical wall. Timing is criticial for this, and I personally rarely manage to do it effectively, but one of my partners, John Bragg, is a master of this maneuver and there is little doubt that is can be very helpful. However, you don't want to do this if it is very windy, because then you'll just be helping the pulled rope to blow somewhere inaccessible. As for being in a position to get out of trouble, I agree that having a pull line that you can lead on can make the difference between a long day (and night) and an actual rescue. Steve Molis and I had the worst-case scenario hang on the Solar Slab rappels last year; the very end of the trailing line hung up and absolutely refused to budge in spite of energetic efforts by both of us together to dislodge it. Eventually, Steve was able to lead up the regular route on the rope we did have, get above the jam, which was out in the middle of a slab away from the route line and not directly reachable. He climbed higher, traversed some tricky and poorly protected ground, and freed the rope by pulling from above. He then reversed the traverse and downclimbed the route, leaving no gear behind. Our ascent (Beulah's book to Helios) had been a bit too leisurely, and after the time spent trying to get the ropes down and deciding what to do next, Steve began in failing light and finished entirely by headlamp light. This illustrates how trad skills, including safe and effective leading with poor protection, can be called into play on any long route. Since we were climbing with double (half) ropes, we had a rope we could lead with. Without this, our options were not good. We might have been able to abandon the stuck rope and get down with our remaining rope, I'm not sure. We would have had to use gear to create intermediate rap stations of course, so if this was possible with what we had, and then we would have had to mount a retrieval expedition which would certainly have consumed a precious vacation day and might have required us to buy more equipment. The only other option would have been to bivouac and wait for another party to show up the next day and help us out. Of course, if the weather turned bad overnight or the next day, a serious rescue situation would have developed. Although we had enough light to get down if there had been no hitches, as it was we were faced with the rest of the descent in the dark. Rappelling the lower Solar Slab gully in inky blackness was a trial of another order, as the inability to see much forced us to rappel ground which I had downclimbed unroped on other occasions. Finding (and not rappelling past) anchors in the dark was a problem, the substantial potential for further hang-ups was an ongoing worry, and the need to continually untangle thrown ropes slowed the process even further. I mention all this because climbing can involve a lot more than tying the right knot.
|
|
|
|
|
knudenoggin
Mar 19, 2009, 4:06 PM
Post #45 of 83
(4190 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 6, 2004
Posts: 596
|
USnavy wrote: We intend to simulrap to save time if it’s getting dark. Generally I just use a figure eight (standard follow through figure eight, not the one sided [ offset] figure eight bend) however I am a bit less sure of how a figure eight reacts to two different rope sizes and how easy a figure eight gets stuck out there. So I guess the question is, follow through figure eight, triple fishermans or EDK for different sized ropes? And if EDK is the best option should I use the follow through EDK[^hH^H^H => Ring Bend (opposing tails) or the EDK bend (tails on the same side)[ Offset Ring Bend]? This question was well anticipated a couple weeks ago under Gear Heads; cf http://www.rockclimbing.com/...orum_view_collapsed; entitled "Beyond the EDK => Offset 9-Oh, 8-Oh". FYI, "bend" has been advocated by Clifford Ashley and those wishing to take his lead as meaning "ends-joining knot" (although historical usage doesn't adhere to this distinction). So, please, forget the new distinction you're trying to make with "bend" vs. "follow-through" (the latter is enough of a nuisance itself). --don't add to sleeping dogs! Regarding your nice images, please note that the top/first one has the ropes oriented poorly: given their different diameters, the thinner should be where the red/thicker one is, and vice versa; the idea is to make it all the more difficult for the knot to flype ("roll")--as the then thinner rope would have to be pried out around the thicker (& thicker pulled down through thinner). In your 2nd photo, you show what I think is the stronger orientation for the Ring Bend--loaded lines running to far end, vs. the same structure but with the other ends loaded and turning more interior. --a small difference asserted various places, and somewhat shown by Lyon Equipment testing (HSE ... report 2001/386?), who as least had the wit to recognize such differences in the Ring Bend (Water knot) and like knots--Fig.8-9-10 bends. (My guess is that strength will be optimal if the knot is set hard by loading the ENDS, to form a nice curved surface over which the mainlines will turn.) Note--in the cited GearHeads thread--the particular end to tie off to back up the Offset Ring Bend (ORB) (aka EDK--there's only one "EDK", don't try to proliferate this); it is the thinner rope, in proper orientation, which is the first to be pulled apart, and so where resistance to that distortion has best effect. *kN*
|
|
|
|
|
debaser655321
Mar 19, 2009, 4:14 PM
Post #46 of 83
(4187 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2004
Posts: 60
|
Whatever knot you chose remember you must put the thicker rope through the anchor/rap ring. Especially if you simulrap.
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Mar 19, 2009, 5:18 PM
Post #48 of 83
(4157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
acorneau wrote: You shouldn't make blanket statements like that. Sounds like a blanket statement...
acorneau wrote: We have 9.9 and a 9.7 ropes. You're telling me that if we thread the 9.7 through the anchors we will DIE?!? No, just you.
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Mar 19, 2009, 6:06 PM
Post #49 of 83
(4141 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
epoch wrote: Buahahahahahahaha... Our resident self-proclaimed hotshot know-it-all bestest climber in Hawaii didn't just ask this, did he? I hope you epic. That comes off making you sound bad. I have to go with Angry on this. Tie the overhand with a second overhand right behind it cinched up tight. Have a good trip USN!
|
|
|
|
|
knudenoggin
Mar 19, 2009, 8:59 PM
Post #50 of 83
(4120 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 6, 2004
Posts: 596
|
rgold wrote: The overhand (AKA Euro Death Knot) is the way to go in Red Rocks. Tying with different-sized ropes is fine, but you should form the knot so that the fatter rope does extra duty in roll prevention: ... For extra security (not normally necessary but perhaps not a bad idea for simul raps) the backup should be tied so as to cut off possible rolling slack: ... Note that the tails in the photos were tied short for illustration purposes. When you tie the knot for real, the tails should be about the length of your forearm. Thanks, RGold. I guess the reply I wrote earlier was lost to my Preview then brainspasm & disconnect w/o posting, duh. The OP's question was well anticipated in a thread started by me about 2 weeks ago in GearHeads, entitled "Beyond the EDK => Offset 9-Oh, 8-Oh". I show similar securing of the Offset Ring Bend with a simple Overhand stopper in the thinner rope (I knew but didn't find your long-ago images), and show it in two orientations (something not commonly understood, and MAYBE of little significance). cf http://www.rockclimbing.com/...d;page=unread#unread At some point, though, I think we need to recognize that the added security is indeed GOOD--and the "leave tails long" advice is superfluous. That WAS the point of my seeking secure options to it, after all: find an offset bend that's free of that caveat. Aric & I hope to put some samples to The Lab's rigors. OP, NB: in your nice image of the Offset Ring Bend, you have the thicker-thinner orientation WRONG, vis-a-vis the rationale of inhibiting flyping described above. And you have the (non-offset) Ring bend (aka "Water Knot") in what has been asserted to be the stronger form--i.e., the mainlines running to the extreme ends of the knot, rather than the the shown ends which lie more interior. Clear images! *kN*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
roy_hinkley_jr
Mar 19, 2009, 10:47 PM
Post #52 of 83
(3927 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2005
Posts: 652
|
debaser655321 wrote: Whatever knot you chose remember you must put the thicker rope through the anchor/rap ring. Especially if you simulrap. Not always a good idea. If using a thick dynamic and skinny static combo, it's better to thread the skinny rope. That way when you pull, you a) can grab the thick rope easier and b) if the rope does get stuck anyway, you have a lot more functional rope in your hands. The caveat if you do it this way is make sure your skinny rope is at least 5 meters longer than the thick to allow for stretch differences.
|
|
|
|
|
budman
Mar 19, 2009, 11:20 PM
Post #53 of 83
(3917 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 170
|
Good point. Also the skinny rope has less friction than the fatty, so it pulls much easier. If multiple rappels thread the pull rope thru next rap station to speed the process. As the pull rope is passing thru the rings someone is stacking and ready to throw when the second rope comes down. Hopefully the skinny is threaded for the hard pulls. If the pulling the fatty and the next pull is bad, pull both and feed the skinny. Spending some extra time saves time. Also make sure the knot is over any edges as the second raps down, bring the knot with them. If you see the knot then it is usually clear of obstacles and excessive friction.
|
|
|
|
|
rgold
Mar 20, 2009, 1:30 AM
Post #54 of 83
(3902 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804
|
There is a reason to thread the thicker rope. With two ropes of unequal diameter, the higher stretch of the thinner rope (together with the thinness) will typically cause it to run through the rappel device faster than the thick rope. The point of threading the thick rope is to allow the knot to jam up against the rap rings and so prevent unequal running of the strands. If this happens with the thin rope threaded, then the knot, which is on the thick rope side, will be pulled down as the rappeller descends, with the result that the ends may be very uneven at the bottom. Without knots in the ends of the rope, uneven ends seem to be the primary cause of fatal rappelling accidents. So climbers who thread the thinner rope for the pulling advantages that method confers also have to be extra vigilent about unequal ends. One way around this is to stabilize the two strands at the anchor by clipping them together with a quickdraw for everyone but the last person down. The party below can manage the ropes in a fireman's belay for the last person, although the tug of war that might ensue could make it hard for them to descend... It is also possible to rappel without the ends becoming uneven---the rappeller has to feed the rappel rope hand-over-hand into the device, rather than allowing the strands to slip through the brake hand.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Mar 20, 2009, 1:36 AM
Post #55 of 83
(3900 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
rgold wrote: There is a reason to thread the thicker rope. With two ropes of unequal diameter, the higher stretch of the thinner rope (together with the thinness) will typically cause it to run through the rappel device faster than the thick rope. The point of threading the thick rope is to allow the knot to jam up against the rap rings and so prevent unequal running of the strands. If this happens with the thin rope threaded, then the knot, which is on the thick rope side, will be pulled down as the rappeller descends, with the result that the ends may be very uneven at the bottom. Without knots in the ends of the rope, uneven ends seem to be the primary cause of fatal rappelling accidents. So climbers who thread the thinner rope for the pulling advantages that method confers also have to be extra vigilent about unequal ends. One way around this is to stabilize the two strands at the anchor by clipping them together with a quickdraw for everyone but the last person down. The party below can manage the ropes in a fireman's belay for the last person, although the tug of war that might ensue could make it hard for them to descend... It is also possible to rappel without the ends becoming uneven---the rappeller has to feed the rappel rope hand-over-hand into the device, rather than allowing the strands to slip through the brake hand. i understand the concept and theory behind this, but to be honest, i've never experienced it myself- and i regularly alternate which rope gets pulled, but i have never experienced noticeable rope creep with my two lines (9.8mm & 8.4mm). thats not to say it doesnt happen in other instances, i'm just posting an observation.
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Mar 20, 2009, 1:50 AM
Post #56 of 83
(3895 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
I don't think you've got a big enough difference. 10mm and 7.5mm and you'll see it plain as day.
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
Mar 20, 2009, 1:57 AM
Post #57 of 83
(3892 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
angry wrote: I don't think you've got a big enough difference. 10mm and 7.5mm and you'll see it plain as day.[/quote +1
|
|
|
|
|
rgold
Mar 20, 2009, 2:30 AM
Post #58 of 83
(3885 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804
|
Right, I guess I was thinking of the case of a normal single and a tag line of some sort. Still, I do think that the potential for getting unequal ends with different diameter ropes, even if it doesn't necessarily happen when the diameters are not too different, means that the rappeller should be especially vigilant about their ends, particularly because this thread is basically for the benefit of beginners.
|
|
|
|
|
jkd159
Mar 20, 2009, 3:06 AM
Post #59 of 83
(3875 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 64
|
I'll admit to having only skimmed the 50+ posts in this thread, so forgive me if this has already been mentioned.
USnavy wrote: Well it depends on the situation. If there is enough rope left I can simply relead the pitch. ... But I guess the largest problem would be determining if there is enough rope left to reach the problem site As others have pointed out, you save yourself lots of headaches when you rappel on two ropes which are each suitable for leading. Except in some very pathological cases, there is always enough rope to lead the pitch, at least to the tail of the other rope. Even for a full 60m pitch, you will have pulled all of rope #1 at the point when rope #2 is free of the rap anchor. So you can lead the pitch on rope #1. If anything gets stuck before rope #2 clears the rap anchor (usually the knot joining the ropes), you are guaranteed to have enough of rope #1 to lead up to the tail of rope #2, at which point you can prussik on both ropes. But we are specifically talking about Dark Shadows, right? If I remember the climb, you don't rappel the route. So if your rope gets stuck, you may not be able to lead the pitch where the rope is stuck. Then things become much more interesting. If anyone is interested, I created a flowchart that describes my procedures for dealing with a stuck rope. Disclaimer: It is not meant to be instructional, it is simply a guide to help experienced climbers make the best decision. http://www.jeffdeutsch.com/...0201/Stuck_Ropes.pdf I'm including the link because I think it is relevant to the discussion, but also because I'm interested in improving the flowchart. If anyone has suggestions, criticisms or flames let me know. I realize the flowchart symbols aren't proper and some of the arrows don't align... That will be fixed when I get around to it. I'm more interested in improving/correcting the content. P.S. Sure, you can avoid getting your rope stuck when rappelling Dark Shadows, but can you keep the rope dry? P.P.S. To answer the OP's original question: I use two EDKs snugged against each other. Long tails, perfectly dressed, well tensioned. RG's recommendation of an EDK with an overhand on one strand is another very good option.
(This post was edited by jkd159 on Mar 20, 2009, 3:25 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Mar 20, 2009, 5:19 AM
Post #60 of 83
(3859 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
angry wrote: I don't think you've got a big enough difference. 10mm and 7.5mm and you'll see it plain as day. i suspect you're right- i just dont climb on anything thicker than 9.8mm anymore unless someone has managed to talk me into wall climbing! i also agree with you, rgold- you definitely need to be diligent and aware of whats going on with your ropes when rappelling, no matter what the circumstance.
|
|
|
|
|
budman
Mar 20, 2009, 2:01 PM
Post #61 of 83
(3850 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 170
|
I understand your logic but after numerous desert routes and lots of towers I'll stick to my system as it works well. I use a square knot backed up by a double fisherman, 9.8lead, and 6mm static tag for weigh and less friction when pulling. First rule of rappeling watch the dam ends of the ropes or your doing something else called trying to get hurt. After having stuck ropes on long days I never tie a knot in the ends of the rope, just something else to get stuck in cracks, on chickenheads, and god knows what else. Fixing things in the dark I believe is more of a hazard than the what some might call the poor system that I use. For the most part in the real world rappels are rarely a full 60m. When they are be very careful with a 60m static and 60m lead rope. Can't say I figured this out on my own. Most are things picked up from friends that have been climbing in the desert for years. All I can say is if it works for you do it as long as you come back in one piece. Oh yeh that goes for your partner too.
|
|
|
|
|
theguy
Mar 20, 2009, 7:07 PM
Post #62 of 83
(3833 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469
|
USnavy wrote: If there is not enough rope left to do a normal free climb lead I can do a roped solo lead with two locking biners and a clove hitch. If both ends of the rope are still at the belay station I can ascend the line with cordlet tied in a prussic or slings with a climbheist. If there is not enough rope to relead the pitch normally, I can also use a prussic or GriGri to climb the rope in a roped solo mode as opposed to the double carabiner and clove hitch method (assuming the other end of the rope can be tied down and assuming the rope is still running through the rap ring). What am I missing in these scenarios? a) Could you explain why a roped solo lead requires less rope than a normal free climb lead? b) If you're able to tie into one end, and you're "assuming the other end of the rope can be tied down", then aren't both ends of the rope still at the belay station, or as good as? c) If "both ends are at the belay station" and you have a partner, why would you ascend the lines with a prussik or klemheist? Why wouldn't you just run one (if one of the ropes is snagged off to the side and you're short on additional rope) or both ropes through your ATC or similar device (you haven't lost that or ditched it in favor of a gri-gri have you?) and have your partner give you a fireman's belay?
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Mar 20, 2009, 8:32 PM
Post #63 of 83
(3816 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
jkd159 wrote: But we are specifically talking about Dark Shadows, right? Not really. The OP specifically mentioned Prince of Darkness. In slight thread drift, I happened to mention Dark Shadows and that our ropes got stuck in the unlikeliest of ways. Here's the story: Final two-rope rap into the pool. Our ropes were tied with an EDK. They pulled fine, and we were able to keep the first one dry. When enough of the second rope was pulled, it started to run freely, as expected. It got about a foot from the end and suddenly stopped. We pulled and tried all sorts of tricks - it wouldn't budge. We waited for the party behind us to free it when they descended. A combination of rock configuration, anchor location, rings on the anchor, and the end of the rope starting to fling around......all conspired to cause a loop of the rope to jam beneath one of the rings on the anchor. It was just an overhand loop, not even a knot, that wedged in just the right way, and no amount of teasing from the ground could release it. Obviously, this was explained to us by the other party, but had we been last, we would have reclimbed the pitches - prussiking was out of the question since we knew 1) somehow the last foot of rope was jammed, 2) no idea how or on what.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Mar 20, 2009, 11:16 PM
Post #64 of 83
(3796 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
theguy wrote: USnavy wrote: If there is not enough rope left to do a normal free climb lead I can do a roped solo lead with two locking biners and a clove hitch. If both ends of the rope are still at the belay station I can ascend the line with cordlet tied in a prussic or slings with a climbheist. If there is not enough rope to relead the pitch normally, I can also use a prussic or GriGri to climb the rope in a roped solo mode as opposed to the double carabiner and clove hitch method (assuming the other end of the rope can be tied down and assuming the rope is still running through the rap ring). What am I missing in these scenarios? Knowledge of how to rope solo and ascend a fixed line, apparently.
In reply to: a) Could you explain why a roped solo lead requires less rope than a normal free climb lead?? Because for a belayed lead, the climber ties into the end of the rope and the belayer runs a bight of rope through his belay device. There has to be enough slack in the rope so that the rope will be able to run from the stuck point down to the belayer and back up to the stuck point. When you rope solo, you anchor one end of the rope, tie into the middle of the rope, and move up your tie-in point as you ascend, so you can rope solo the route with very little slack in the rope.
In reply to: c) If "both ends are at the belay station" and you have a partner, why would you ascend the lines with a prussik or klemheist? Why wouldn't you just run one (if one of the ropes is snagged off to the side and you're short on additional rope) or both ropes through your ATC or similar device (you haven't lost that or ditched it in favor of a gri-gri have you?) and have your partner give you a fireman's belay? To ascend a rope you use prusiks. A belay device is not necessary or useful, nor is a fireman's belay. There is no such thing as "up-rappelling." Jay
|
|
|
|
|
theguy
Mar 20, 2009, 11:45 PM
Post #65 of 83
(3793 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469
|
jt512 wrote: theguy wrote: USnavy wrote: If there is not enough rope left to do a normal free climb lead I can do a roped solo lead with two locking biners and a clove hitch. If both ends of the rope are still at the belay station I can ascend the line with cordlet tied in a prussic or slings with a climbheist. If there is not enough rope to relead the pitch normally, I can also use a prussic or GriGri to climb the rope in a roped solo mode as opposed to the double carabiner and clove hitch method (assuming the other end of the rope can be tied down and assuming the rope is still running through the rap ring). What am I missing in these scenarios? Knowledge of how to rope solo and ascend a fixed line, apparently. In reply to: a) Could you explain why a roped solo lead requires less rope than a normal free climb lead?? Because for a belayed lead, the climber ties into the end of the rope and the belayer runs a bight of rope through his belay device. There has to be enough slack in the rope so that the rope will be able to run from the stuck point down to the belayer and back up to the stuck point. When you rope solo, you anchor one end of the rope, tie into the middle of the rope, and move up your tie-in point as you ascend, so you can rope solo the route with very little slack in the rope. In reply to: c) If "both ends are at the belay station" and you have a partner, why would you ascend the lines with a prussik or klemheist? Why wouldn't you just run one (if one of the ropes is snagged off to the side and you're short on additional rope) or both ropes through your ATC or similar device (you haven't lost that or ditched it in favor of a gri-gri have you?) and have your partner give you a fireman's belay? To ascend a rope you use prusiks. A belay device is not necessary or useful, nor is a fireman's belay. There is no such thing as "up-rappelling." Jay Thanks for clarification. Re. a) If I'm understanding right, you're proposing that he'd rope-solo the stuck end of the rope, just needing enough slack for the clove hitches and any backup knots? Re. b) I was thinking of Dark Shadows and POD specifically, where you can climb the rap lines. Evidently if you can't climb it, you're going to need to ascend the rope...
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Mar 20, 2009, 11:51 PM
Post #66 of 83
(3790 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
theguy wrote: jt512 wrote: theguy wrote: USnavy wrote: If there is not enough rope left to do a normal free climb lead I can do a roped solo lead with two locking biners and a clove hitch. If both ends of the rope are still at the belay station I can ascend the line with cordlet tied in a prussic or slings with a climbheist. If there is not enough rope to relead the pitch normally, I can also use a prussic or GriGri to climb the rope in a roped solo mode as opposed to the double carabiner and clove hitch method (assuming the other end of the rope can be tied down and assuming the rope is still running through the rap ring). What am I missing in these scenarios? Knowledge of how to rope solo and ascend a fixed line, apparently. In reply to: a) Could you explain why a roped solo lead requires less rope than a normal free climb lead?? Because for a belayed lead, the climber ties into the end of the rope and the belayer runs a bight of rope through his belay device. There has to be enough slack in the rope so that the rope will be able to run from the stuck point down to the belayer and back up to the stuck point. When you rope solo, you anchor one end of the rope, tie into the middle of the rope, and move up your tie-in point as you ascend, so you can rope solo the route with very little slack in the rope. In reply to: c) If "both ends are at the belay station" and you have a partner, why would you ascend the lines with a prussik or klemheist? Why wouldn't you just run one (if one of the ropes is snagged off to the side and you're short on additional rope) or both ropes through your ATC or similar device (you haven't lost that or ditched it in favor of a gri-gri have you?) and have your partner give you a fireman's belay? To ascend a rope you use prusiks. A belay device is not necessary or useful, nor is a fireman's belay. There is no such thing as "up-rappelling." Jay Thanks for clarification. Re. a) If I'm understanding right, you're proposing that he'd rope-solo the stuck end of the rope, just needing enough slack for the clove hitches and any backup knots? Yes.
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Mar 21, 2009, 7:25 PM
Post #67 of 83
(3760 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
budman wrote: I use a square knot backed up by a double fisherman, 9.8lead, and 6mm static tag for weigh and less friction when pulling. Man, I love the square knot. So elegant, so simple, so... knotty. I've never used it for rapping (I just use it to secure my chalkbag belt), but with a double fisherman backup, I bet it's as good as anything else out there. The sharp bends that "weaken" it is the big argument against it, I gather, but if you're worried about your rope breaking under any force you could conceivably exert on rappel, you're probably climbing on clothesline. If you've trusted it to hold ropes with such diameter differences, more similarly-sized rope would be no problem.
|
|
|
|
|
knudenoggin
Mar 21, 2009, 8:22 PM
Post #68 of 83
(3749 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 6, 2004
Posts: 596
|
zeke_sf wrote: So elegant, so simple, so... knotty. I've never used it for rapping (I just use it to secure my chalkbag belt), but with a double fisherman backup, I bet it's as good as anything else out there. The sharp bends that "weaken" it is the big argument against it, I gather, ... So ... --what?! So ill-suited to different-nature (size, stiffness, ...) ropes! And backed up with Strangle knots, which are the component halves of a Dlb.Fish./Grapevine. Aside from poor performance w/mis-matched ropes, the Square knot w/back-ups is much more bulky and difficult to pull over a surface than the Offset knots previously cited. (And well longer to tie/untie, though simple enough.) It might be noted here that the back-up, Strangle knots in this case are only as tight as one sets them; in contrast to the simple Overhand back-up for the Offset Ring Bend (EDK), which will be tensioned further by loading (if it is set properly snug to the ORB body). Indeed, some might prefer the Thief knot (Square form, but loaded on catercorner ends) precisely so that in slippage it will bring the Strangle back-ups into some tension. (But that doesn't help with flow over a surface.) *kN*
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Mar 21, 2009, 9:18 PM
Post #69 of 83
(3743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
I certainly agree about a square knot not being safe for ropes of different diameters. Sailors discovered this quite some time ago. In situations with differing ropes, there is another knot that is superior. But, I wouldn't use it for rappel. One of the dangers of the square knot is that, with ropes of differing stiffness, it can transfer into a girth hitch around one strand. Basically like a one wrap prussik. In fact, this transformation is where the other name of the square knot is derived from - the reef knot. It was used to reef sails (bundle them up for less area in the wind) because it could be shaken out by pulling on one strand. Not something I would trust without back-ups. The EDK is much better suited for rappelling applications.
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Mar 22, 2009, 5:50 AM
Post #70 of 83
(3719 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
knudenoggin wrote: zeke_sf wrote: So elegant, so simple, so... knotty. I've never used it for rapping (I just use it to secure my chalkbag belt), but with a double fisherman backup, I bet it's as good as anything else out there. The sharp bends that "weaken" it is the big argument against it, I gather, ... So ... --what?! So ill-suited to different-nature (size, stiffness, ...) ropes! And backed up with Strangle knots, which are the component halves of a Dlb.Fish./Grapevine. Aside from poor performance w/mis-matched ropes, the Square knot w/back-ups is much more bulky and difficult to pull over a surface than the Offset knots previously cited. (And well longer to tie/untie, though simple enough.) It might be noted here that the back-up, Strangle knots in this case are only as tight as one sets them; in contrast to the simple Overhand back-up for the Offset Ring Bend (EDK), which will be tensioned further by loading (if it is set properly snug to the ORB body). Indeed, some might prefer the Thief knot (Square form, but loaded on catercorner ends) precisely so that in slippage it will bring the Strangle back-ups into some tension. (But that doesn't help with flow over a surface.) *kN* Despite your book larnin', it seems dude has had a successful track record with this combo? And that's quite a millimeter spread between his tag and lead line too. And, much as I appreciate a Squah Knot, I'm not actually gonna rap off of it when the EDK and other options are better. Also, I think the whole rope catching the tie-in knot deal may be overstated, but, hey, if I hadn't used an EDK at Red Rock, I may well have had that problem as well.
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Mar 22, 2009, 5:52 AM
Post #71 of 83
(3715 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
bill413 wrote: I certainly agree about a square knot not being safe for ropes of different diameters. Sailors discovered this quite some time ago. In situations with differing ropes, there is another knot that is superior. But, I wouldn't use it for rappel. One of the dangers of the square knot is that, with ropes of differing stiffness, it can transfer into a girth hitch around one strand. Basically like a one wrap prussik. In fact, this transformation is where the other name of the square knot is derived from - the reef knot. It was used to reef sails (bundle them up for less area in the wind) because it could be shaken out by pulling on one strand. Not something I would trust without back-ups. The EDK is much better suited for rappelling applications. I stopped reading at "Sailors". Did I miss anything?
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Mar 22, 2009, 5:53 AM
Post #72 of 83
(3710 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
zeke_sf wrote: bill413 wrote: I certainly agree about a square knot not being safe for ropes of different diameters. Sailors discovered this quite some time ago. In situations with differing ropes, there is another knot that is superior. But, I wouldn't use it for rappel. One of the dangers of the square knot is that, with ropes of differing stiffness, it can transfer into a girth hitch around one strand. Basically like a one wrap prussik. In fact, this transformation is where the other name of the square knot is derived from - the reef knot. It was used to reef sails (bundle them up for less area in the wind) because it could be shaken out by pulling on one strand. Not something I would trust without back-ups. The EDK is much better suited for rappelling applications. I stopped reading at "Sailors". Did I miss anything?
|
|
|
|
|
catbird_seat
Mar 23, 2009, 1:55 AM
Post #73 of 83
(3685 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 7, 2004
Posts: 425
|
vegastradguy wrote: rgold wrote: There is a reason to thread the thicker rope. With two ropes of unequal diameter, the higher stretch of the thinner rope (together with the thinness) will typically cause it to run through the rappel device faster than the thick rope. The point of threading the thick rope is to allow the knot to jam up against the rap rings and so prevent unequal running of the strands. If this happens with the thin rope threaded, then the knot, which is on the thick rope side, will be pulled down as the rappeller descends, with the result that the ends may be very uneven at the bottom. Without knots in the ends of the rope, uneven ends seem to be the primary cause of fatal rappelling accidents. So climbers who thread the thinner rope for the pulling advantages that method confers also have to be extra vigilent about unequal ends. One way around this is to stabilize the two strands at the anchor by clipping them together with a quickdraw for everyone but the last person down. The party below can manage the ropes in a fireman's belay for the last person, although the tug of war that might ensue could make it hard for them to descend... It is also possible to rappel without the ends becoming uneven---the rappeller has to feed the rappel rope hand-over-hand into the device, rather than allowing the strands to slip through the brake hand. i understand the concept and theory behind this, but to be honest, i've never experienced it myself- and i regularly alternate which rope gets pulled, but i have never experienced noticeable rope creep with my two lines (9.8mm & 8.4mm). thats not to say it doesnt happen in other instances, i'm just posting an observation. I have seen this creep when the smaller rope is threaded through the anchor. My partner was really tired and not paying attention to what he was doing. I was at the anchor, pinching the strands together with my hand to prevent the knot from migrating any further. It was disturbing.
|
|
|
|
|
TJGoSurf
Mar 26, 2009, 7:32 PM
Post #74 of 83
(3616 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 17, 2008
Posts: 280
|
EDK, and not to point out the obvious, with your long tails make sure you don't try to rap down the tails, its a real short/long trip.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Mar 26, 2009, 7:44 PM
Post #75 of 83
(3609 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
Holy fuck!! Has that happened before?
|
|
|
|
|
TJGoSurf
Mar 26, 2009, 7:48 PM
Post #76 of 83
(1089 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 17, 2008
Posts: 280
|
Probably more than once, I've heard about it happening at Table Rock I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Mar 26, 2009, 8:48 PM
Post #77 of 83
(1075 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
Thats fucked up. Obviously it's completely human error but still, that sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
knudenoggin
Mar 27, 2009, 12:29 AM
Post #78 of 83
(1046 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 6, 2004
Posts: 596
|
And it's a good reason to use a secured "EDK" such as has been presented in "Beyond the EDK => Offset 9-Oh..."; i.e., do NOT use a knot that requires the caveat "leave long tails"!
In reply to: the higher stretch of the thinner rope (together with the thinness) will typically cause it to run through the rappel device faster than the thick rope. Two points re this: 1) Where is it shown that the usual "static" haul line has more stretch (at approx. half body weight, here) than dynamic rope (which has been designed to try to minimize this, but still is dynamic) ? --kinda hard to find such data on the smaller ropes, isn't it?! And at half body wgt., how much diff. will there be? (2) If indeed one rope stretched more than the other, well, that implies that the OTHER must feed faster through the rap. device (to compensate for the first rope's stretched length)! In fact, I surmise it's more an issue of difference in friction at the device that leads to more slippage of the thin rope. *kN*
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Mar 27, 2009, 1:31 AM
Post #79 of 83
(1033 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
notapplicable wrote: Thats fucked up. Obviously it's completely human error but still, that sucks. my partner almost did that off the top of intersection rock. had he not double checked, he'd be dead. definitely something to watch out for.
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
Mar 27, 2009, 2:11 AM
Post #80 of 83
(1029 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
knudenoggin wrote: the higher stretch of the thinner rope (together with the thinness) will typically cause it to run through the rappel device faster than the thick rope. Two points re this: 1) Where is it shown that the usual "static" haul line has more stretch (at approx. half body weight, here) than dynamic rope (which has been designed to try to minimize this, but still is dynamic) ? --kinda hard to find such data on the smaller ropes, isn't it?! And at half body wgt., how much diff. will there be? Just a heads up, but if I remember correctly USNavy's (wise) plan is to bring two dynamic ropes. That way if one gets caught on the pull he at least has a chance of still holding on to a lead-able rope to use to try and retrieve the stuck line. Don't remember if he said that in this thread or another of his threads in the "getting ready for RR" series. So, the skinnier line WILL stretch more because it is dynamic. Otherwise, you would be right. Typically with a skinny static second line the skinny line will still run through the device more quickly it just won't stretch more.
|
|
|
|
|
knudenoggin
Mar 28, 2009, 2:17 AM
Post #81 of 83
(985 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 6, 2004
Posts: 596
|
[POSTED IN PART TO GET THE QUOTES RIGHT (A., yours lacked ']' after 'knudenoggin') ]
altelis wrote: knudenoggin wrote: In reply to: the higher stretch of the thinner rope (together with the thinness) will typically cause it to run through the rappel device faster than the thick rope. Two points re this: 1) Where is it shown that the usual "static" haul line has more stretch (at approx. half body weight, here) than dynamic rope (which has been designed to try to minimize this, but still is dynamic) ? --kinda hard to find such data on the smaller ropes, isn't it?! And at half body wgt., how much diff. will there be? ... USNavy's (wise) plan is to bring two dynamic ropes. ... So, the skinnier line WILL stretch more because it is dynamic. Otherwise, you would be right. Typically with a skinny static second line the skinny line will still run through the device more quickly it just won't stretch more. NO, whether there's a difference in stretch depends on the particular ropes: e.g., look over Beal's specs, and you'll see that in some cases the skinnier rope has less stretch--to the same static-loading-- than even 10.5-11mm ones!! And in use the question will be re stretch to well shy of 80kg per rope. Now, finding data (for possible other combinations) re "accessory cord" ropes is not so easy. (And the same aspect for Caving rope is painted by a different standard.) *kN*
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
Mar 28, 2009, 2:43 AM
Post #82 of 83
(974 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
Duder, my respectful reply is, em, well, YES. A static rope will stretch less than a dynamic rope. And, in case you missed it, I had "typically" in there for a reason. There may be some rope combos where the skinnier dynamic will stretch less than a fatter dynamic, HOWEVER, the typical case is that the skinnier dynamic line stretches more than the fatter dynamic line. this is the rule, to which, yes, there are exceptions.
|
|
|
|
|
knudenoggin
Mar 28, 2009, 1:18 PM
Post #83 of 83
(959 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 6, 2004
Posts: 596
|
Well, to your "typical", I challenge for actual facts, as IIRC the Beal data does NOT support that generalization (MUCH to my surprise, esp. re their 11mm). And, again, realize that the UIAA-standard data is for the full 80kg, whereas the lines will be used jointly and halving force between them, and to some degree halving thus any small (and it will be small--8.5% vs. 10%) difference in stretching. *kN*
|
|
|
|
|
|