|
|
|
|
acorneau
Jul 24, 2009, 6:58 PM
Post #1 of 73
(22309 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
Howdy folks, (Mods: If this belongs someplace other than the Lab, please move it to the most appropriate forum.) Every once in a while I'll head over to Mountain Project and browse through the latest pictures. I found this one and thought I'd toss it over here for some discussion: http://www.mountainproject.com/v/philgru/106496750 From what I can see, there is a couple of nuts, a piton and some other anchor out of view. The anchor points are tied off with clove hitches (guessing for the out-of view piece), a fig-8 on a bight between the two left pieces and the same for the right two. The person in the pic seems to be connected directly to the anchor point out of view (possibly with a clove hitch). The person taking the picture is tethered into the two fig-8's with a locker. I can see the two fig-8's coming together to create a main "master point" and being able to adjust the clove hitches to even things out. Simple, rope-built anchor which seems to fit most folks criteria for an anchor. So, what do you think?
(This post was edited by acorneau on Jul 24, 2009, 7:01 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Jul 24, 2009, 7:09 PM
Post #2 of 73
(22288 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
Looks like a clusterfuck to me. All the pain of rigging an equalette (including tying the stopper knots) with none of the benefits. That doesn't look like it equalizes worth a shit for anything other than the direction of pull it was rigged for (eg straight down). Seems to me if you're going to toss out equalization you might as well rig a standard-issue cordalette or just girth-hitch the rope to each piece in series. Much faster that way. Would I bitch about it if someone belayed me up on that? Only if it took as long to rig as it looks like it did.
|
|
|
|
|
billl7
Jul 24, 2009, 7:24 PM
Post #3 of 73
(22269 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1890
|
Bugs me some that his tie-in with the rope bypasses the power point and goes directly to one piece of pro (off picture) - mostly an extension issue should that piece blow. I'm assuming his belay was /will be off the harness. What's that hanger-looking thing on the locker at the power point? Bill
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Jul 24, 2009, 7:35 PM
Post #4 of 73
(22249 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
billl7 wrote: Bugs me some that his tie-in with the rope bypasses the power point and goes directly to one piece of pro (off picture) Yeah, I would have left more slack to tie into the master point with a clove.
In reply to: What's that hanger-looking thing on the locker at the power point? Looks like a hanger used for carrot bolts:
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 24, 2009, 7:48 PM
Post #5 of 73
(22230 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
looks like too much effort, with no real safety gains, over other systems.
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Jul 24, 2009, 8:05 PM
Post #6 of 73
(22208 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
acorneau wrote: billl7 wrote: Bugs me some that his tie-in with the rope bypasses the power point and goes directly to one piece of pro (off picture) Yeah, I would have left more slack to tie into the master point with a clove. In reply to: What's that hanger-looking thing on the locker at the power point? Looks like a hanger used for carrot bolts: WTF is a carrot bolt?
|
|
|
|
|
billl7
Jul 24, 2009, 8:25 PM
Post #8 of 73
(22169 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1890
|
Wow, thanks for the info. I've never seen such a hanger. I guess that is an answer to the problem of hangerless bolts.
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Jul 24, 2009, 8:40 PM
Post #9 of 73
(22145 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
acorneau wrote: knieveltech wrote: WTF is a carrot bolt? It's a bolt that sticks out of the rock a little and has no permanent hanger, and is used mostly down-under. Looks like this: You slide one of the hangers on it then clipping a biner is supposed to hold it in place, but sometimes it doesn't work completely: Thanks for the explanation. That is fucking horrifying.
|
|
|
|
|
Alpine07
Jul 24, 2009, 8:40 PM
Post #10 of 73
(22145 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 1, 2007
Posts: 842
|
While we are on the subject of interesting anchors... Take a look at this. Top of anchor: Bottom of anchor:
(This post was edited by Alpine07 on Jul 24, 2009, 8:44 PM)
|
Attachments:
|
IMG_1953 2.JPG
(139 KB)
|
|
IMG_1952 2.JPG
(92.0 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
moof
Jul 24, 2009, 8:46 PM
Post #11 of 73
(22136 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 400
|
Best I can tell the dude is on a clove to the leftmost piece. Perhaps he's out right just for the photo-op? The left 2 pieces form a V with cloves and a figure 8 in the middle. The rightmost 2 pieces get exactly the same, with the slack of the rope dangling out of frame off the rightmost piece (presumably piled on the ledge?). 1. The two figure 8's come together at too much of an angle, crossloadind the biner the camera man is clipped in with. 2. Only static equalization as already noted. 3. It is not clear to me what will change when the leader takes off, but as shown the dude is putting his weight onto a single piece. To be done properly he should be tied into a locker at the power point so that a falling leader won't cause the belayer to load only a single piece. I'm guessing something along those lines would happen before they proceeded, but no context is given. 4. The pile of slings on the dude's shoulder imply that he did up this anchor as a novelty, not out of necessity. It would be nice to know how those nuts are, as it sort of looks like a situation where cloving them together with a sling to maintain their orientation might be prudent. Again, context intrigues me.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 24, 2009, 8:50 PM
Post #12 of 73
(22125 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Bomber! How shitty was the ice that it warranted 5 screws?
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 24, 2009, 8:54 PM
Post #13 of 73
(22118 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
knieveltech wrote: That is fucking horrifying. Heh. Stay. Away. from moab.
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Jul 24, 2009, 8:55 PM
Post #14 of 73
(22114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
sungam wrote: knieveltech wrote: That is fucking horrifying. Heh. Stay. Away. from moab. What, the rock near Moab doesn't take gear?
|
|
|
|
|
Alpine07
Jul 24, 2009, 8:56 PM
Post #15 of 73
(22113 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 1, 2007
Posts: 842
|
Dude, it was so bad, haha. Edit: And by bad, I mean awesome. Except for the crappy pro, it was some of the most fun stuff that I have climbed on.
(This post was edited by Alpine07 on Jul 24, 2009, 8:57 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 24, 2009, 10:04 PM
Post #17 of 73
(22035 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
knieveltech wrote: sungam wrote: knieveltech wrote: That is fucking horrifying. Heh. Stay. Away. from moab. What, the rock near Moab doesn't take gear?
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 24, 2009, 10:06 PM
Post #18 of 73
(22031 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
acorneau wrote: Alpine07 wrote: While we are on the subject of interesting anchors... Take a look at this. I've never been ice climbing before, but I would guess that 5 ice screws plus the two axes probably would hold a little bit. Hah. Wishfull thinking. If it needs 5 screws and 2 axxes, and won't take a abakolov then falling iz not an option, but also more likely. Go figure.
|
|
|
|
|
yankinoz
Jul 24, 2009, 10:30 PM
Post #19 of 73
(22009 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 28, 2007
Posts: 35
|
knieveltech wrote: acorneau wrote: knieveltech wrote: WTF is a carrot bolt? It's a bolt that sticks out of the rock a little and has no permanent hanger, and is used mostly down-under. Looks like this: [image]http://www.safercliffs.org/images/machine_bolt.jpg[/image] You slide one of the hangers on it then clipping a biner is supposed to hold it in place, but sometimes it doesn't work completely: [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/0/178530-work-33618.jpg[/image] Thanks for the explanation. That is fucking horrifying. No more so than the snakes or spiders.
|
|
|
|
|
philbox
Moderator
Jul 24, 2009, 11:39 PM
Post #20 of 73
(21971 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2002
Posts: 13105
|
I've seen the OP type of anchor taught in an ACIA text book from memory. I've never been a fan of it but have used it on occasion. It works a treat when you have a well spread out anchor with a significantly high piece which needs extending down a very long way. The thing about using the rope is that you have a fair degree of equalisation due to the inherent spring in the rope. What I don't like about this anchor as pictured is the triaxial loading on the locker. Chuck another locker opposed in there and yer sweet. This definitely looks like an Australian setup and the give away is as pointed out the carrot hanger. A lot of the old carrots are being replaced nowadays but there are still significant carrot fields out there particularly in the Blue Mountains. One of my fave climbs is called Hotel California and if you run the first two pitches together you need something like 25 hangers and of course the quickdraws to match. Itsa rope stretcher. The really horrifying thing about carrots s was pointed out is that they do not work with a lot of the more modern tiny thin biners now extensively used. They were designed to be used with the olde solid gate clip gated biners. Don't use wire gates. Leaders have been shocked when all their gear fell off the route. It occurs when the rope jiggles the hanger and qickdraw combination such that the nose jiggles around to the hanger bolt junction. Scary.
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Jul 24, 2009, 11:54 PM
Post #21 of 73
(21958 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
sungam wrote: knieveltech wrote: sungam wrote: knieveltech wrote: That is fucking horrifying. Heh. Stay. Away. from moab. What, the rock near Moab doesn't take gear? Ah, I see hexes are worth carrying!
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Jul 24, 2009, 11:58 PM
Post #22 of 73
(21952 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
Fully qualified CF anchor but this is interesting that no one talks about master biner and potential X-load problems.
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Jul 25, 2009, 1:44 AM
Post #23 of 73
(21886 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
majid_sabet wrote: Fully qualified CF anchor but this is interesting that no one talks about master biner and potential X-load problems. You must have missed the mention of tri-axial / cross-loading. Go back & find it.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Jul 25, 2009, 2:36 AM
Post #24 of 73
(21857 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
Looks like the third pitch belay on Watchtower Crack, Arapiles. (I checked the photo caption and yes I'm right) This is how I do 90% of my anchors. Its fast, its safe, it doesn't need a cordalette, its easy to adjust, its dynamic and it equalisers. The only thing it doesn't do is dynamic equalisation. (I wouldn't normally have such a sharp angle between my to figure-8s though.) If anybody has any questions about how and why regarding this anchor I'd be happy to answer them.
majid_sabet wrote: Fully qualified CF anchor but this is interesting that no one talks about master biner and potential X-load problems. Far from a CF majid. Just because you don't understand a system doesn't make it wrong.
knieveltech wrote: Looks like a clusterfuck to me. All the pain of rigging an equalette (including tying the stopper knots) with none of the benefits. That doesn't look like it equalizes worth a shit for anything other than the direction of pull it was rigged for (eg straight down). I find it as fast if not faster to rig than a cordalette. It is easier to equalise than a cordalette.
knieveltech wrote: Seems to me if you're going to toss out equalization you might as well rig a standard-issue cordalette or just girth-hitch the rope to each piece in series. Much faster that way. Girth hitch (i presume you me clove hitch) the rope in series WTF!? where is the equalisation there?
knieveltech wrote: Would I bitch about it if someone belayed me up on that? Only if it took as long to rig as it looks like it did. It takes no longer to rig than most anchor setups.
(This post was edited by patto on Jul 25, 2009, 2:54 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
Alpine07
Jul 25, 2009, 2:42 AM
Post #25 of 73
(21849 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 1, 2007
Posts: 842
|
sungam wrote: acorneau wrote: Alpine07 wrote: While we are on the subject of interesting anchors... Take a look at this. I've never been ice climbing before, but I would guess that 5 ice screws plus the two axes probably would hold a little bit. Hah. Wishfull thinking. If it needs 5 screws and 2 axxes, and won't take a abakolov then falling iz not an option, but also more likely. Go figure. Wishful thinking indeed. When my brother cleaned the anchor he was able to yank out two of the screws. A picket would have been much better, but lacking that, five screws and two tools did the job alright.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Jul 25, 2009, 2:50 AM
Post #26 of 73
(14395 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
patto wrote: knieveltech wrote: Seems to me if you're going to toss out equalization you might as well rig a standard-issue cordalette or just girth-hitch the rope to each piece in series. Much faster that way. Girth hitch the rope in series WTF!? where is the equalisation there? I'm guessing he meant "clove hitch" not "girth hitch".
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Jul 25, 2009, 2:55 AM
Post #27 of 73
(14390 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
acorneau wrote: I'm guessing he meant "clove hitch" not "girth hitch". True, true. I actually presumed the same thing. Either way my comment stands, unless the pieces are perfectly in line clove hitching in series doesn't equalise.
|
|
|
|
|
moof
Jul 25, 2009, 4:08 AM
Post #28 of 73
(14370 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 400
|
majid_sabet wrote: Fully qualified CF anchor but this is interesting that no one talks about master biner and potential X-load problems. Dude, that was my first comment ont he anchor...
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 25, 2009, 4:37 AM
Post #29 of 73
(14362 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Alpine07 wrote: sungam wrote: acorneau wrote: Alpine07 wrote: While we are on the subject of interesting anchors... Take a look at this. I've never been ice climbing before, but I would guess that 5 ice screws plus the two axes probably would hold a little bit. Hah. Wishfull thinking. If it needs 5 screws and 2 axxes, and won't take a abakolov then falling iz not an option, but also more likely. Go figure. Wishful thinking indeed. When my brother cleaned the anchor he was able to yank out two of the screws. A picket would have been much better, but lacking that, five screws and two tools did the job alright. Did you consider hammering you axe in like a picket? Now THAT would have been truely awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
Alpine07
Jul 25, 2009, 4:16 PM
Post #30 of 73
(14327 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 1, 2007
Posts: 842
|
sungam wrote: Alpine07 wrote: sungam wrote: acorneau wrote: Alpine07 wrote: While we are on the subject of interesting anchors... Take a look at this. I've never been ice climbing before, but I would guess that 5 ice screws plus the two axes probably would hold a little bit. Hah. Wishfull thinking. If it needs 5 screws and 2 axxes, and won't take a abakolov then falling iz not an option, but also more likely. Go figure. Wishful thinking indeed. When my brother cleaned the anchor he was able to yank out two of the screws. A picket would have been much better, but lacking that, five screws and two tools did the job alright. Did you consider hammering you axe in like a picket? Now THAT would have been truely awesome! Hahaha. That would have been awesome trying to pound in a viper ice tool with "fangs" (pinky rest).
|
|
|
|
|
knudenoggin
Jul 25, 2009, 7:15 PM
Post #31 of 73
(14306 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 6, 2004
Posts: 596
|
patto wrote: majid_sabet wrote: Fully qualified CF anchor but this is interesting that no one talks about master biner and potential X-load problems. Far from a CF majid. Just because you don't understand a system doesn't make it wrong. knieveltech wrote: Looks like a clusterfuck to me. All the pain of rigging an equalette (including tying the stopper knots) with none of the benefits. .... Two "... CF"s, but only Majid gets slammed? No bias here, is there. ---- Of the presumed four Clove Hitches, only three can be seen; the ones left & right are mis-tied -- loaded line should lead to the spine-side of this knot, not away from it. Were the powerpoint 'biner reversed -- narrow end holding Fig.8 eyeknots --, I think that the cross-loading forces would be reduced (as the eyes would be pretty close together and to the spine, vs. one able to drift away). As for set-up, I agree that this looks as quick to set up as anything. And using those short slings instead of the rope ... ? Please show how that would be nearly as quick and equalized (they are short!). (One could Clove H. the infamous "ADT" on each side, then clip an extra two 'biners into each triangle, and repeat for the masterpoint -- ELETs. But that's three slings + 2 more 'biners, and all static.) *kN*
|
|
|
|
|
skinner
Jul 26, 2009, 1:29 AM
Post #32 of 73
(14278 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2004
Posts: 1747
|
Well, ya gotta admit, he looks pretty damn proud of his setup anyways. IMO, all the clove-hitches on the piton and nuts, should go, they limit the anchors efficiency to small directional range. It's not how I'd do it, but I am rarely fortunate enough to find 3 sound placements (in the local choss-stone) for an anchor, let alone 4!!! I don't worry as much about x-loading biners, since I use primarily ovals, and locking ovals for building anchors. All that aside, Isn't this.... just a "rivet" and this.. a "rivet hanger"?
The_Climbers_Dictionary" wrote: Rivet: A short metal stud or machine screw which is tapped into a drilled hole and connected to a short sling or hanger. Rivets are used as protection primarily on aid routes and are intended to hold the body weight of a climber, even in very shallow holes. I guess when people don't use SS and they end up all rusted to f*ck, they sort of do resemble a row of poorly planted carrots. And this.. It's got an oval biner and a yates shorty screamer on it, it's good to go! BTW.. is that a an old Clog? SMC, Chounard? hex? (have some similar ones hanging above my fireplace). Why I really dropped into the lab was.. I heard a rumor that sungam is going to be visiting the Alberta Rockies soon?
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Jul 26, 2009, 3:32 AM
Post #33 of 73
(14258 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
skinner wrote: Isn't this....just a "rivet" and this..a "rivet hanger"? Not quite. This is a rivet: The first bolt in this chart is what the Aussies call a carrot and is glued in:
In reply to: BTW.. is that a an old Clog? SMC, Chounard? hex? It's a modern-day DB wired hex, I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
wiki
Jul 26, 2009, 4:23 AM
Post #34 of 73
(14239 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2007
Posts: 243
|
acorneau wrote: skinner wrote: Isn't this....just a "rivet" and this..a "rivet hanger"? Not quite. This is a rivet: Funny... Thats what we call carrot tops in NZ... They are all bashed in and pretty rusty mostly! Don't know if there is even any of those Aussie ones around.
|
|
|
|
|
philbox
Moderator
Jul 26, 2009, 7:02 AM
Post #35 of 73
(14221 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2002
Posts: 13105
|
Old school carrots are not glued in. They are filed down to look like an actual carrot. They are then pounded in the usually hand drilled hole. Some of the oldy baddy traddies still aroundwill still use this method. They always hand drill on lead and bash these things in. This one is typical of what can be seen up in the Blueies. This one was ripped out of Brisbane's Kangaroo Point. It shows how the thread was filed down. It's a wonder more people have not decked on sme of the timebombs that have been getting replaced. You'd be surprised what a carrot will hold.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 26, 2009, 7:04 AM
Post #36 of 73
(14221 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
skinner wrote: And this.. It's got an oval biner and a yates shorty screamer on it, it's good to go! BTW.. is that a an old Clog? SMC, Chounard? hex? (have some similar ones hanging above my fireplace). Why I really dropped into the lab was.. I heard a rumor that sungam is going to be visiting the Alberta Rockies soon? BD hex on 1/4 inchers with a wing nut on. Aint the Fishers grand? Plenty of driven stars on that pitch, too. It is true, indeed, that I shall be arriving in canadia in no less then 3 days! Calgary shall be my point of arrival. Shall we make like a banana and climb something? Edit: CT.
(This post was edited by sungam on Jul 26, 2009, 7:17 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 26, 2009, 7:17 AM
Post #38 of 73
(14217 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
:puke:
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Jul 26, 2009, 12:11 PM
Post #39 of 73
(14193 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
Phil, where's the pic of that valve stem? Lol
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Jul 26, 2009, 1:44 PM
Post #40 of 73
(14178 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
philbox wrote: Old school carrots are not glued in. They are filed down to look like an actual carrot. Hey Phibox, Thanks for chiming in and clarifying the whole "carrot" thing. So you guys don't call them carrots anymore? What do you call the mechanical/chemical bolts now?
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Jul 26, 2009, 10:56 PM
Post #41 of 73
(14130 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
patto wrote: Girth hitch (i presume you me clove hitch) the rope in series WTF!? where is the equalisation there? There is none, and often none is needed. I brought a partner up on a bomber 3" nut and a slung chickenhead the size of my forearm last weekend. No need to equalize that.
patto wrote: It takes no longer to rig than most anchor setups. Bullshit. Cordalette: 2, 3, or 4 pieces, one knot, shitty equalization. Equallette: 2, 3, or 4 pieces, one knot per piece, excellent equalization. The anchor pictured: 4 pieces, six knots, shitty equalization + force amplification due to angle.
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Jul 26, 2009, 10:57 PM
Post #42 of 73
(14129 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
acorneau wrote: patto wrote: knieveltech wrote: Seems to me if you're going to toss out equalization you might as well rig a standard-issue cordalette or just girth-hitch the rope to each piece in series. Much faster that way. Girth hitch the rope in series WTF!? where is the equalisation there? I'm guessing he meant "clove hitch" not "girth hitch". This is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Jul 26, 2009, 11:13 PM
Post #43 of 73
(14123 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
knieveltech wrote: There is none, and often none is needed. I brought a partner up on a bomber 3" nut and a slung chickenhead the size of my forearm last weekend. No need to equalize that.[ If I am going to the trouble of adding a second or third piece for redundancy then if go to the trouble to ensure that there is equalisation and no extension.
knieveltech wrote: patto wrote: It takes no longer to rig than most anchor setups. Bullshit. Cordalette: 2, 3, or 4 pieces, one knot, shitty equalization. Equallette: 2, 3, or 4 pieces, one knot per piece, excellent equalization. The anchor pictured: 4 pieces, six knots, shitty equalization + force amplification due to angle. Well you can BS all you want but this anchoring style is bloody fast. In the time that it takes you to take your cordalette off your harness I would probably have all three clove hitches attached to the pieces. (A fouth is rarely necessary). I normally use this method even despite having a cordalette sitting on my harness. I find it just as fast. It has the advantages of not needing two cordalettes on multipitching. Though if you're not swinging leads then building anchors out of climbing rope has its disadvantages.
(This post was edited by patto on Jul 27, 2009, 10:32 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Jul 27, 2009, 12:34 AM
Post #44 of 73
(14102 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
sungam wrote: knieveltech wrote: sungam wrote: knieveltech wrote: That is fucking horrifying. Heh. Stay. Away. from moab. What, the rock near Moab doesn't take gear? Funny thing is I was so scared of that bolt that I used the screamer on it thinking there was no way it would get worse. Hehe, oh boy was I wrong...
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Jul 27, 2009, 12:37 AM
Post #45 of 73
(14099 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
skinner wrote: BTW.. is that a an old Clog? SMC, Chounard? hex? (have some similar ones hanging above my fireplace). Definitely not an old hex, but it is a BD hex. Bought it probably about 5 years ago. And yes, I use it.
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Jul 27, 2009, 12:39 AM
Post #46 of 73
(14098 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
patto wrote: You can call BS all you want but I normally use this method even despite having a cordalette sitting on my harness. I find it just as fast. *shrug* I don't much care about your chosen method of anchoring. I'm simply pointing out you're full of shit for saying you can rig six knots on four pieces of gear anywhere near as fast as your average climber can rig a cordolette. So you're slow building anchors. That's fine. I'm not likely to end up behind you on a climb so carry on.
|
|
|
|
|
philbox
Moderator
Jul 27, 2009, 7:55 AM
Post #47 of 73
(14068 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2002
Posts: 13105
|
acorneau wrote: philbox wrote: Old school carrots are not glued in. They are filed down to look like an actual carrot. Hey Phibox, Thanks for chiming in and clarifying the whole "carrot" thing. So you guys don't call them carrots anymore? What do you call the mechanical/chemical bolts now? Actually we do call glue in machine bolts carrots too. There is a difference between a glue in and an old bash in though. Generically the head of a bolt sticking out of the rock either bashed in old school like or glue in new wave type is all called a carrot. j_ung, I really should dig up that engine valve pic, I've still got the olde engine valve kicking around in my museum of bits and pieces I keep in my bolting kit. I use them for excuses if I ever again get busted by a ranger. Officer, I was only replacing this bad piece of gear, honest injun. The pic of the engine valve is on my old pbase account. I'll try to put it up via the jpeg link, I'll also link the url page if that doesn't stick. pbase is funny about linking pics directly. http://www.pbase.com/phil_box/image/17694264 How's that for a baaaaaad belay. Imagine heading up one of the old school routes and seeing that hit you in the face like a wet mullet.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Jul 27, 2009, 10:48 AM
Post #48 of 73
(14045 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
knieveltech wrote: *shrug* I don't much care about your chosen method of anchoring. I'm simply pointing out you're full of shit for saying you can rig six knots on four pieces of gear anywhere near as fast as your average climber can rig a cordolette. So you're slow building anchors. That's fine. I'm not likely to end up behind you on a climb so carry on. I'm not asking you to care about my chosen method of anchoring. But why you feel the need to insult me simply because you prefer a cordalette over the climbing rope somewhat baffles me. I have extensively used both coralettes and this climbing rope method as an anchoring method. I find neither one especially faster than the other.They both have a couple advantages over each other in certain circumstances. Do you really think I choose the climbing rope over the cordalette for some perverse reason not mentioned? Either way it seems clear that you have never built this style of anchor in your life so I don't see how you are in much of a position to comment and the speed of constructing one.
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Jul 27, 2009, 11:27 AM
Post #49 of 73
(14034 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
acorneau wrote: skinner wrote: Isn't this....just a "rivet" and this..a "rivet hanger"? Not quite. This is a rivet: [image]http://www.fixeusa.com/images/products/bolts/buttonhead_300x373.gif[/image] Nope. That is NOT a rivet. That is a classic rawl drive button head split shaft bolt. A rivet, at least in Yosemite, is a standard machine bolt pounded into a hole. DMT
(This post was edited by dingus on Jul 27, 2009, 11:30 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
king_rat
Jul 27, 2009, 12:12 PM
Post #50 of 73
(14015 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 365
|
Having climbed in a quite a few different countries (US, UK, Australia, SA, France, Spain and Italy) you often find that there are different ideas about techniques and safety in different countries. I think it comes down to the climbing culture and history of that country. Argue till you're blue in the face, but people who learnt to climb within a particular climbing culture will always think that their way is superior to yours. As for the original anchor, it basically looks OK, if you are used to setting up this kind of anchor it can be done quickly. I do have two issues with it. 1 the guy in the photo appears to be attached to one of the anchors rather then the master point. If this anchor was to fail it looks like he would then load the second anchor 2 the angle at which the ropes are tied in to the locking biner.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Jul 27, 2009, 12:34 PM
Post #51 of 73
(5793 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
king_rat wrote: Having climbed in a quite a few different countries (US, UK, Australia, SA, France, Spain and Italy) you often find that there are different ideas about techniques and safety in different countries. I think it comes down to the climbing culture and history of that country. Argue till you're blue in the face, but people who learnt to climb within a particular climbing culture will always think that their way is superior to yours. As for the original anchor, it basically looks OK, if you are used to setting up this kind of anchor it can be done quickly. I do have two issues with it. 1 the guy in the photo appears to be attached to one of the anchors rather then the master point. If this anchor was to fail it looks like he would then load the second anchor 2 the angle at which the ropes are tied in to the locking biner. I agree with your two issues.
|
|
|
|
|
fitzontherocks
Jul 27, 2009, 1:23 PM
Post #52 of 73
(5779 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 11, 2003
Posts: 864
|
The original anchor looks like all pieces are all in the same crack or feature. By the book, that's supposed to be bad, but the rock itself looks decent.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Jul 27, 2009, 2:12 PM
Post #53 of 73
(5765 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
fitzontherocks wrote: The original anchor looks like all pieces are all in the same crack or feature. By the book, that's supposed to be bad, but the rock itself looks decent. Crack climbing. Sometimes all your lead protection and all your anchor is in the same feature. Though having led this climb myself I remember i did place a small nut on a different feature. But yes for flakes or minor cracks you should be quite aware of this issue. Also yes the rock is extraordinarily good. After all it is the home of the original micronut the RP. Infact his leftmost visible peice IS an RP. EDIT some photos of this fantastic climb can be seen here: http://images.google.com.au/...amp;hl=en&tab=wi
(This post was edited by patto on Jul 27, 2009, 2:16 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
king_rat
Jul 27, 2009, 2:24 PM
Post #54 of 73
(5759 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 365
|
fitzontherocks wrote: The original anchor looks like all pieces are all in the same crack or feature. By the book, that's supposed to be bad, but the rock itself looks decent. This is only really an issue if the rock/feature has the potential to fail, break or move such as stacking cams behind a flake or under a boulder. Looking at this picture it looks highly unlikely that that crack would fail unless the whole side of the mountain collapsed.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Jul 27, 2009, 2:37 PM
Post #55 of 73
(5753 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
dingus wrote: Nope. That is NOT a rivet. That is a classic rawl drive button head split shaft bolt. A rivet, at least in Yosemite, is a standard machine bolt pounded into a hole. DMT I've never come across one, so I'll defer to your greater experience. You learn something new every day! [edit for extraneous apostrophe]
(This post was edited by acorneau on Jul 28, 2009, 2:25 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Jul 27, 2009, 3:06 PM
Post #56 of 73
(5738 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
patto wrote: I'm not asking you to care about my chosen method of anchoring. But why you feel the need to insult me simply because you prefer a cordalette over the climbing rope somewhat baffles me. You're mistaken on a couple of points here. I don't prefer the cordalette. I prefer the equalette or the rope, but in any case my anchor preferences aren't the issue here. I've stated a clear disagreement with your asertion that tying six knots on the rope (two of which are height dependent and thus apt to result in screwing around with clove hitches to get the height right) could even possibly be as fast as clipping three or four pieces of gear, pulling down on the cord, and then tying a single overhand or eight. That's simply nonsensical. Even if you nailed your lengths first try you can't tie six knots in equal or less time than it takes to tie a single overhand. If you find that insulting, well, life is often difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Jul 27, 2009, 3:17 PM
Post #57 of 73
(5731 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
knieveltech wrote: Even if you nailed your lengths first try you can't tie six knots in equal or less time than it takes to tie a single overhand. If you find that insulting, well, life is often difficult. No but that was not what I asserted in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
blondgecko
Moderator
Jul 28, 2009, 6:06 AM
Post #58 of 73
(5684 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666
|
Ahh, the Watchtower crack. Still up there as one of the scariest climbs I've ever done. The fear was all self-inflicted, though - I attacked it armed mostly with RPs, nuts, and only two pieces of gear (a #10 hex and a #4 Camalot) that were actually big enough to fit in the crack proper.
|
|
|
|
|
skinner
Jul 29, 2009, 9:36 PM
Post #59 of 73
(5625 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2004
Posts: 1747
|
sungam wrote: skinner wrote: And this.. It's got an oval biner and a yates shorty screamer on it, it's good to go! BTW.. is that a an old Clog? SMC, Chounard? hex? (have some similar ones hanging above my fireplace). Why I really dropped into the lab was.. I heard a rumor that sungam is going to be visiting the Alberta Rockies soon? BD hex on 1/4 inchers with a wing nut on. Aint the Fishers grand? Plenty of driven stars on that pitch, too. It is true, indeed, that I shall be arriving in canadia in no less then 3 days! Calgary shall be my point of arrival. Shall we make like a banana and climb something? Edit: CT. Latest rumors have you dwelling with the darkside ? Get Grant to bring you down for a beer at Nicks tonight after 8:00 PM, and I'm sure you can hook up with someone to get out with,.. I won't know until the morning what day(s) I can go, but if I don't have to work, let's climb something. I just talked to Brenden aka-the_climber, who'll be at Nicks as well.
|
|
|
|
|
skinner
Jul 29, 2009, 10:05 PM
Post #60 of 73
(5613 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2004
Posts: 1747
|
acorneau wrote: skinner wrote: Isn't this....just a "rivet" and this..a "rivet hanger"? Not quite. This is a rivet: Well I guess we must just be cheap here, I know that official "rivets" like in the photo (above) exist, I've never actually come across one myself. All the "rivet ladders" that I've had the misfortune to find myself on, were made up of nothing more then 1/4" slightly modified (or not).. standard machine bolts, tapped in, with just the threads holding them in place. Pretty much all like this.. Basically, most of us here refer to anything that is just bashed into a hole without some form of anchoring mechanism as is the case with a bolt, intended for body weight only (of course sometimes this is the only pro, and you hope/pray that it will exceed these expectations when/if required).. a rivet. It's all semantics when you come across one and there's nothing else around. I for one, clip it, don't really care what it's called, hope it holds!
|
|
|
|
|
scotty1974
Jul 30, 2009, 6:03 PM
Post #61 of 73
(5569 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 31, 2006
Posts: 248
|
In response to the ice anchor.... Seems strong but yipes that's alot of gear!! Hope there isn't a pitch after that one! 5 screws and 2 axes?? I'm also assuming it's not wieghted, but there seems to be alot of slack and lack of equalization. I'd probably use less gear since the ice "looks" good and tidy it up a bit IMO.
(This post was edited by scotty1974 on Jul 30, 2009, 6:06 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
rightarmbad
Aug 24, 2009, 12:16 PM
Post #62 of 73
(5472 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 218
|
The term carrot in Australia originally referred to a badly placed bash in bolt, possible bent, droopy or suffering other maladies from a bad install. Good bolts are just that, bolts. Newer climbers just call everything that is a bolt a carrot, as they tend not to have any contact with the original installers of these things.
|
|
|
|
|
mikebee
Aug 24, 2009, 12:53 PM
Post #63 of 73
(5457 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 190
|
In reply to: Newer climbers just call everything that is a bolt a carrot, as they tend not to have any contact with the original installers of these things. I reckon that a lot of climbers, regardless of age or era now refer to any hanger-less bolt (like the one pictured above) as a "carrot". Certainly everyone I speak to about climbing uses the term that way.
|
|
|
|
|
Alpine07
Aug 25, 2009, 9:20 PM
Post #64 of 73
(5390 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 1, 2007
Posts: 842
|
In response to the response to the ice anchor. It may seem strong, but it is not. It is not weighted. The reason for it looking like there is a lot of slack and such is because I was leaning away to take the picture, which makes it look unequalized by pulling sideways on the anchor... The ice may look good, but I assure you that it is nowhere near being good. Oh yeah, it was night too.
|
|
|
|
|
shimanilami
Aug 25, 2009, 9:57 PM
Post #65 of 73
(5373 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043
|
The guy in the picture is the follower. The belay was redirected through the piece out of the picture on the left. The belayer is attached to the powerpoint via a sling. The crossloading is not that severe, and the master 'biner is not going to get shock loaded. I'd have no concerns about this. I can't figure out why there's keyhole hanger on the master 'biner. Presuming the pieces are good, that achor is bomber. And if using the rope to build the anchor bothers you, grow up.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Aug 26, 2009, 1:53 PM
Post #66 of 73
(5342 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
shimanilami wrote: The guy in the picture is the follower. The belay was redirected through the piece out of the picture on the left. The belayer is attached to the powerpoint via a sling. The crossloading is not that severe, and the master 'biner is not going to get shock loaded. I'd have no concerns about this. I can't figure out why there's keyhole hanger on the master 'biner. Presuming the pieces are good, that achor is bomber. And if using the rope to build the anchor bothers you, grow up. Was this directed at me or just replying to the thread?
|
|
|
|
|
shimanilami
Aug 26, 2009, 4:52 PM
Post #67 of 73
(5320 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043
|
acorneau wrote: Was this directed at me or just replying to the thread? Not at you.
|
|
|
|
|
Factor2
Aug 26, 2009, 5:49 PM
Post #68 of 73
(5303 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 17, 2008
Posts: 188
|
is nobody looking at the shitton of rope that anchor uses? what if you had a 180, 190' pitch after that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wesleydouglas
Aug 27, 2009, 6:54 AM
Post #73 of 73
(5219 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 16, 2004
Posts: 8
|
Hangerless bolts in Australia are generally and accurately described as carrots. Original carrots were mild steel bash-in types. Nost of those place nowadays are stainless steel glue-ins. Carrots were developed by Bryden Allen, a current member of the Sydney Rockclimbing Club, to protect unprotectable sections on sandstone cliffs - the main rock-type we climb here in NSW, Australia. They are a neat and low-key solution to a local problem - soft sandstone. Carrots and keyhole hangers are mostly bomber with very few failures recorded in decades of use. Expansion-type bolts cannot be used in NSW sandstone. Occasionally visiting Yanks, Poms or Euros will squeal with puzzlement when they rock up to a sport crag and find that the route they want to climb is hanger free. When in Australia BYO hangers, although many sport crags - such as Nowra - mostly have ringbolts or fixed hangers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|