|
ClimbOnSister
Mar 21, 2012, 2:54 PM
Post #1 of 71
(8710 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 21, 2012
Posts: 8
|
If you like both, you should check out this site: http://www.climbonsister.com/ Training tips, humorous articles, women crushing rocks. Why would you look any further?
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 21, 2012, 3:32 PM
Post #2 of 71
(8673 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
ClimbOnSister wrote: If you like both, you should check out this site: http://www.climbonsister.com/ Training tips, humorous articles, women crushing rocks. Why would you look any further? All that time trying to gain equality... and look what you gone and done. We are not the ones keeping you down .
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Mar 21, 2012, 3:48 PM
Post #3 of 71
(8655 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
I love both. So I looked at your site. The structure of it is not clear to me, which means I have to work real hard to get anything potentially useful out of it. I don't have time for that. Disclaimer: I'm a guy. And not a super web savvy guy either. So I'm sure that you will consider my inability to quickly assess and understand your website as my shortcoming. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but I'm pretty sure that others will feel the same so I'd think about giving it a more obvious structure.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Mar 21, 2012, 3:53 PM
Post #4 of 71
(8646 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
ceebo wrote: ClimbOnSister wrote: If you like both, you should check out this site: http://www.climbonsister.com/ Training tips, humorous articles, women crushing rocks. Why would you look any further? All that time trying to gain equality... and look what you gone and done. We are not the ones keeping you down . You can't keep us down, and I can't understand your post. We're even, I suppose.
|
|
|
|
|
kennoyce
Mar 21, 2012, 7:40 PM
Post #5 of 71
(8511 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2001
Posts: 1338
|
shockabuku wrote: I love both. So I looked at your site. The structure of it is not clear to me, which means I have to work real hard to get anything potentially useful out of it. I don't have time for that. Disclaimer: I'm a guy. And not a super web savvy guy either. So I'm sure that you will consider my inability to quickly assess and understand your website as my shortcoming. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but I'm pretty sure that others will feel the same so I'd think about giving it a more obvious structure. I completely agree. There needs to be some kind of organization. As it is right now, I wouldn't ever go there again.
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Mar 21, 2012, 8:11 PM
Post #6 of 71
(8491 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
shockabuku wrote: The structure of it is not clear to me, which means I have to work real hard to get anything potentially useful out of it. I don't have time for that. Disclaimer: I'm a guy. And not a super web savvy guy either. So I'm sure that you will consider my inability to quickly assess and understand your website as my shortcoming. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but I'm pretty sure that others will feel the same so I'd think about giving it a more obvious structure. Yet you somehow manage on this site, and, I'm certain, others as well. Site builders need to always remember that *all* people spend the vast majority of their time *on other sites*. Theirs is not so special or so compelling that people would be willing to put up with having to learn their way around (with the exception of games).
|
|
|
|
|
kiwiprincess
Mar 21, 2012, 8:47 PM
Post #7 of 71
(8462 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 26, 2007
Posts: 307
|
Thanks for the link
|
|
|
|
|
ClimbOnSister
Mar 21, 2012, 8:56 PM
Post #8 of 71
(8448 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 21, 2012
Posts: 8
|
Thanks for the feedback, guys. I admit, it could be more organized. The "site" is actually on Blogger and I'm trying to figure out a better solution to organizing posts. For now though, it'll have to do.
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 22, 2012, 2:04 PM
Post #9 of 71
(8305 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
wonderwoman wrote: ceebo wrote: ClimbOnSister wrote: If you like both, you should check out this site: http://www.climbonsister.com/ Training tips, humorous articles, women crushing rocks. Why would you look any further? All that time trying to gain equality... and look what you gone and done. We are not the ones keeping you down . You can't keep us down, and I can't understand your post. We're even, I suppose. The Op's website in regards to male/female equality is compareble to ''the cop stopped me coz i is black''. The fact that the car was flashing up stolen, just a detail. I do not see poeple here pointing out ''male'' spacific feets.. just individual feets that happen to be mostly from men. It gets on my fking nerves when women have to point out the fact that they are women. Btw, why is their a need to have a spacific women's sub forum on RC?. Another pointless and moronic devide.I respect women as equal.. so fking respect me back as it?... you don't need ''special'' treatments. Lets not stop their though. I suggest the following. Sub forums to be added: - For overweight people - For coulerd peoples - For disabled people
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Mar 22, 2012, 4:22 PM
Post #10 of 71
(8242 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
ceebo wrote: wonderwoman wrote: ceebo wrote: ClimbOnSister wrote: If you like both, you should check out this site: http://www.climbonsister.com/ Training tips, humorous articles, women crushing rocks. Why would you look any further? All that time trying to gain equality... and look what you gone and done. We are not the ones keeping you down . You can't keep us down, and I can't understand your post. We're even, I suppose. The Op's website in regards to male/female equality is compareble to ''the cop stopped me coz i is black''. The fact that the car was flashing up stolen, just a detail. I do not see poeple here pointing out ''male'' spacific feets.. just individual feets that happen to be mostly from men. It gets on my fking nerves when women have to point out the fact that they are women. Btw, why is their a need to have a spacific women's sub forum on RC?. Another pointless and moronic devide.I respect women as equal.. so fking respect me back as it?... you don't need ''special'' treatments. Lets not stop their though. I suggest the following. Sub forums to be added: - For overweight people - For coulerd peoples - For disabled people Female climbers are a minority in this sport. Women are built different, we have periods and the ability to have babies, we have different training needs in the sence we have different strengths and weaknessnes because of our bodies. It can also be hard to find practical gear and clothing that work for rock and ice climbing. They just don't make the same amount of stuff for women as they do for men, or at least the stores don't carry the same selection. And even when there is and it is carried it can be lower functionality for the sake of being "more attractive". We also look at issues differently. There are too many factors here to pin it down, but in general women tend to be more empathetic and more emotional (or at least show it more) than men. Editing is weak and Khoi is correct.
(This post was edited by granite_grrl on Mar 23, 2012, 12:53 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Mar 22, 2012, 4:36 PM
Post #12 of 71
(8227 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
ceebo wrote: wonderwoman wrote: ceebo wrote: ClimbOnSister wrote: If you like both, you should check out this site: http://www.climbonsister.com/ Training tips, humorous articles, women crushing rocks. Why would you look any further? All that time trying to gain equality... and look what you gone and done. We are not the ones keeping you down . You can't keep us down, and I can't understand your post. We're even, I suppose. The Op's website in regards to male/female equality is compareble to ''the cop stopped me coz i is black''. The fact that the car was flashing up stolen, just a detail. I do not see poeple here pointing out ''male'' spacific feets.. just individual feets that happen to be mostly from men. It gets on my fking nerves when women have to point out the fact that they are women. Btw, why is their a need to have a spacific women's sub forum on RC?. Another pointless and moronic devide.I respect women as equal.. so fking respect me back as it?... you don't need ''special'' treatments. Lets not stop their though. I suggest the following. Sub forums to be added: - For overweight people - For coulerd peoples - For disabled people Women are different than men. That's a fact that only an idiot would argue against. The significance and relevance of those differences are debatable, but the difference isn't. So a different forum for them makes sense. Just like sport climbers and boulderers have separate forums.
(This post was edited by shockabuku on Mar 22, 2012, 4:37 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
climbs4fun
Moderator
Mar 22, 2012, 4:56 PM
Post #13 of 71
(8199 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 19, 2003
Posts: 9679
|
ok guys. Although this guy's post was less than appropriate, let's try to keep it civil. Name calling will not change anything and certainly not the thought process of somebody like this. I'd hide his/her posts, but they've been quoted too many times. If it doesn't remain civil, the whole thread is going to the recycle bin.
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 22, 2012, 7:39 PM
Post #14 of 71
(8129 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
granite_grrl wrote: Female climbers are a minority in this sport. Women are built different, we have periods and the ability to have babies, we have different training needs in the sence we have different strengths and weaknessnes because of our bodies. It can also be hard to find practical gear and clothing that work for rock and ice climbing. They just don't make the same amount of stuff for women as they do for men, or at least the stores don't carry the same selection. And even when there is and it is carried it can be lower functionality for the sake of being "more attractive". We also look at issues differently. There are too many factors here to pin it down, but in general women tend to be more empathetic and more emotional (or at least show it more) than men. Be reasonable, you act like women landed on earth 2 days ago. Quite aware of the biological differances. And in terms of man/women climbing.. you are only differant in what you wanne define from. Ultimately we are all the same.. in the sence we are climbing rock?. So you pee sitting and i pee standing, huge deal right?. I'm not trying to be an ass really. But please share with me what is so hugely differant in the way women train for climbing than what men do?. Women can't use hang boards or campus boards?. Women can't off train with wieghts?. Women can't climb with a weight vest?. The beta of X route is invalid to you becuase it was made by a man?. You need to remove that devide you have in your head, along with the other 2 girls who decided to choose forum names of such.
(This post was edited by ceebo on Mar 22, 2012, 7:40 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
surfstar
Mar 22, 2012, 7:50 PM
Post #15 of 71
(8116 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 31, 2011
Posts: 206
|
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Mar 23, 2012, 12:06 AM
Post #16 of 71
(8060 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
ceebo wrote: granite_grrl wrote: Female climbers are a minority in this sport. Women are built different, we have periods and the ability to have babies, we have different training needs in the sence we have different strengths and weaknessnes because of our bodies. It can also be hard to find practical gear and clothing that work for rock and ice climbing. They just don't make the same amount of stuff for women as they do for men, or at least the stores don't carry the same selection. And even when there is and it is carried it can be lower functionality for the sake of being "more attractive". We also look at issues differently. There are too many factors here to pin it down, but in general women tend to be more empathetic and more emotional (or at least show it more) than men. Be reasonable, you act like women landed on earth 2 days ago. Quite aware of the biological differances. And in terms of man/women climbing.. you are only differant in what you wanne define from. Ultimately we are all the same.. in the sence we are climbing rock?. So you pee sitting and i pee standing, huge deal right?. I'm not trying to be an ass really. But please share with me what is so hugely differant in the way women train for climbing than what men do?. Women can't use hang boards or campus boards?. Women can't off train with wieghts?. Women can't climb with a weight vest?. The beta of X route is invalid to you becuase it was made by a man?. You need to remove that devide you have in your head, along with the other 2 girls who decided to choose forum names of such. Actually I often pee standing up too out in the woods thanks to my Freshette. I was also told in my recent thread trying to get information about weight lifting that I shouldn't be lifting weights at all because I'll bulk up too much. I don't know what divide I need to remove from my head, I'm quite comfortable in the world of men (from my work to my play) and I don't feel like I need to pretend I'm not a woman. But it's silly for you to assume that women don't like their own little space to talk with other people who understand them much better than someone like you does.
|
|
|
|
|
Khoi
Mar 23, 2012, 12:30 AM
Post #17 of 71
(8046 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 294
|
granite_grrl wrote: Coloured - I think that any coloured people that are involved in climbing in North America have had similar upbringings as white poeple in North America. What kind of "coloured" issues do they need to discuss. You should have quit before you blundered down to his level.
|
|
|
|
|
happiegrrrl
Mar 23, 2012, 4:34 AM
Post #18 of 71
(7975 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660
|
ceebo wrote: ... Lets not stop their though. I suggest the following. Sub forums to be added: - For overweight people - For coulerd peoples - For disabled people Then surely the place should also have a sub-forum for users whose posts are consistently rated as one-star wonders.
|
|
|
|
|
tscampbell
Mar 23, 2012, 8:17 AM
Post #19 of 71
(7942 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 30, 2009
Posts: 38
|
there is a reason i prefer climbing with women. ego. it seems men these days have a pretty hard time putting that shit away and realizing that we're just talking about climbing rocks. it's fun. it shouldn't be anything else. thanks for your civility ladies.
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 23, 2012, 10:24 AM
Post #20 of 71
(7914 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
granite_grrl wrote: ceebo wrote: granite_grrl wrote: Female climbers are a minority in this sport. Women are built different, we have periods and the ability to have babies, we have different training needs in the sence we have different strengths and weaknessnes because of our bodies. It can also be hard to find practical gear and clothing that work for rock and ice climbing. They just don't make the same amount of stuff for women as they do for men, or at least the stores don't carry the same selection. And even when there is and it is carried it can be lower functionality for the sake of being "more attractive". We also look at issues differently. There are too many factors here to pin it down, but in general women tend to be more empathetic and more emotional (or at least show it more) than men. Be reasonable, you act like women landed on earth 2 days ago. Quite aware of the biological differances. And in terms of man/women climbing.. you are only differant in what you wanne define from. Ultimately we are all the same.. in the sence we are climbing rock?. So you pee sitting and i pee standing, huge deal right?. I'm not trying to be an ass really. But please share with me what is so hugely differant in the way women train for climbing than what men do?. Women can't use hang boards or campus boards?. Women can't off train with wieghts?. Women can't climb with a weight vest?. The beta of X route is invalid to you becuase it was made by a man?. You need to remove that devide you have in your head, along with the other 2 girls who decided to choose forum names of such. Actually I often pee standing up too out in the woods thanks to my Freshette. I was also told in my recent thread trying to get information about weight lifting that I shouldn't be lifting weights at all because I'll bulk up too much. I don't know what divide I need to remove from my head, I'm quite comfortable in the world of men (from my work to my play) and I don't feel like I need to pretend I'm not a woman. But it's silly for you to assume that women don't like their own little space to talk with other people who understand them much better than someone like you does. I was out walking not so long ago and a girl in the group had to go pee, she made no deal about it. ''I have to go''.. we walked on slowly.. a min later she was back with us, ok great, full steam ahead. The fact that she done it crouched or standing is irelivent, no normal person actually cares either way. She got on with it. Are you saying that only girls will bulk up if lifting to much?. Yes ofc its been a mans world for a long time but things have changed and are still changing. The point im getting at is that descrimination works both ways. If you constantly need to point out the fact you are differant.. even though those differances by many have been accepted and brushed aside.. then thats upto you. And i still think that having a women only forum that is basically saying ''men stay out'' is utter bull shit. Any issues women have should be openly discussed so that more poeple have a chance to understand and accept them. p.s happygrrl, you make no5.
(This post was edited by ceebo on Mar 23, 2012, 10:27 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Mar 23, 2012, 10:54 AM
Post #21 of 71
(7902 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
ceebo wrote: wonderwoman wrote: ceebo wrote: ClimbOnSister wrote: If you like both, you should check out this site: http://www.climbonsister.com/ Training tips, humorous articles, women crushing rocks. Why would you look any further? All that time trying to gain equality... and look what you gone and done. We are not the ones keeping you down . You can't keep us down, and I can't understand your post. We're even, I suppose. The Op's website in regards to male/female equality is compareble to ''the cop stopped me coz i is black''. The fact that the car was flashing up stolen, just a detail. I do not see poeple here pointing out ''male'' spacific feets.. just individual feets that happen to be mostly from men. It gets on my fking nerves when women have to point out the fact that they are women. Btw, why is their a need to have a spacific women's sub forum on RC?. Another pointless and moronic devide.I respect women as equal.. so fking respect me back as it?... you don't need ''special'' treatments. Lets not stop their though. I suggest the following. Sub forums to be added: - For overweight people - For coulerd peoples - For disabled people We should have a special Ceebo forum too, and keep your incoherent spew out of all other parts of the site.
|
|
|
|
|
6pacfershur
Mar 23, 2012, 1:25 PM
Post #22 of 71
(7868 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 23, 2010
Posts: 254
|
tscampbell wrote: .....ego.....we're just talking about climbing rocks. it's fun. it shouldn't be anything else..... +1
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Mar 23, 2012, 2:06 PM
Post #23 of 71
(7845 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
camhead wrote: ceebo wrote: wonderwoman wrote: ceebo wrote: ClimbOnSister wrote: If you like both, you should check out this site: http://www.climbonsister.com/ Training tips, humorous articles, women crushing rocks. Why would you look any further? All that time trying to gain equality... and look what you gone and done. We are not the ones keeping you down . You can't keep us down, and I can't understand your post. We're even, I suppose. The Op's website in regards to male/female equality is compareble to ''the cop stopped me coz i is black''. The fact that the car was flashing up stolen, just a detail. I do not see poeple here pointing out ''male'' spacific feets.. just individual feets that happen to be mostly from men. It gets on my fking nerves when women have to point out the fact that they are women. Btw, why is their a need to have a spacific women's sub forum on RC?. Another pointless and moronic devide.I respect women as equal.. so fking respect me back as it?... you don't need ''special'' treatments. Lets not stop their though. I suggest the following. Sub forums to be added: - For overweight people - For coulerd peoples - For disabled people We should have a special Ceebo forum too, and keep your incoherent spew out of all other parts of the site. I've been thinking this for some time. This thread and the overweight climbing thread sure make me feel like less of an asshole.
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 23, 2012, 2:55 PM
Post #24 of 71
(7818 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
happiegrrrl wrote: ceebo wrote: ... Lets not stop their though. I suggest the following. Sub forums to be added: - For overweight people - For coulerd peoples - For disabled people Then surely the place should also have a sub-forum for users whose posts are consistently rated as one-star wonders. No day withought night. A person like you may understand.
|
|
|
|
|
happiegrrrl
Mar 23, 2012, 3:18 PM
Post #25 of 71
(7810 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660
|
ceebo wrote: And i still think that having a women only forum that is basically saying ''men stay out'' is utter bull shit. Any issues women have should be openly discussed so that more poeple have a chance to understand and accept them. p.s happygrrl, you make no5. Your insight("men stay out") is incorrect. The Ladies Room is not a women-only section. It is simply a place where women-specific issues may be posted in a place that has a higher degree of moderation than the General section. The reason is, that in less-moderated sections, woman-specific threads have been shown to be degraded by remarks made by some users. In General, a woman posting about issues like "Why are the guys hitting on me? I just want to climb?" is going to get at least ONE "useless without pics" type response, and likely will be a lot worse. In the Ladies Room, the chances of that occurring are less, due to the moderation, and when/if it does, the remark will be removed, which helps the thread stay on topic. Men are welcome in the Ladies Room, and often participate. On the other hand, I would really like to see a Men's Room section. I wish RC.com would add it. Male-bashing or "useless without pics" type posts by women would not be tolerated; it would be interesting to watch the section evolve.
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Mar 23, 2012, 5:40 PM
Post #26 of 71
(2962 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
happiegrrrl wrote: On the other hand, I would really like to see a Men's Room section. I wish RC.com would add it. Male-bashing or "useless without pics" type posts by women would not be tolerated; it would be interesting to watch the section evolve. The whold world is the Men's Room! But all kidding aside, I can't really imagine that many men would have those kind of conversations online. In my experience they don't happen in person very often unless someone is pretty drunk.
|
|
|
|
|
happiegrrrl
Mar 23, 2012, 5:58 PM
Post #27 of 71
(2955 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660
|
I know...but I think the IDEA of a Men's Room here would have the monkeys rattling cages and throwing pooh, providing a measure of entertainment value.
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 23, 2012, 7:56 PM
Post #29 of 71
(2932 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
happiegrrrl wrote: ceebo wrote: And i still think that having a women only forum that is basically saying ''men stay out'' is utter bull shit. Any issues women have should be openly discussed so that more poeple have a chance to understand and accept them. p.s happygrrl, you make no5. Your insight("men stay out") is incorrect. The Ladies Room is not a women-only section. It is simply a place where women-specific issues may be posted in a place that has a higher degree of moderation than the General section. The reason is, that in less-moderated sections, woman-specific threads have been shown to be degraded by remarks made by some users. In General, a woman posting about issues like "Why are the guys hitting on me? I just want to climb?" is going to get at least ONE "useless without pics" type response, and likely will be a lot worse. In the Ladies Room, the chances of that occurring are less, due to the moderation, and when/if it does, the remark will be removed, which helps the thread stay on topic. Men are welcome in the Ladies Room, and often participate. On the other hand, I would really like to see a Men's Room section. I wish RC.com would add it. Male-bashing or "useless without pics" type posts by women would not be tolerated; it would be interesting to watch the section evolve. 99% of topics on Rc venture off into the unkown, much like this one. Why, when it is a womens topics.. should it be any differant?. Are your issues more important than w/e issue was of any other topic?. Ofc.. yopu are a ''minority''.. clear the way guys. Men hitting on women, will that ever change?.... not unless the power/s that be re write nature itself. A mans forum is not needed, since you do not see poster names like MexicanMaleClimber who has a issue like ''not matter how much i shake.. or flick.. or squeeze.. the last drop always runs down my leg!''. Shit rolls down hill indeed, but their is more than one side to a hill. But w/e.. the world is flat, meh? who cares.
|
|
|
|
|
happiegrrrl
Mar 23, 2012, 8:31 PM
Post #30 of 71
(2917 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660
|
chadnsc wrote: Uh, you mean the campground? No, I mean a section where if women came in and said, of a guy upset because no matter how much he shakes, squeezes, flicks, the pee still runs down his leg, something like "Well you know...some people are into water sports." and then sent the guy a PM trying to hit on him, the comment would be deleted and she would get the mod smackdown. Yes - I know it is unnecessary. The post was a spontaneous attempt at humor. quote "ceebo"] 99% of topics on Rc venture off into the unkown, much like this one. Why, when it is a womens topics.. should it be any differant?. Are your issues more important than w/e issue was of any other topic?. Ofc.. yopu are a ''minority''.. clear the way guys. It is not that women's issues are more important. It is because without some moderation, the space would become unsafe for some of the women. If you cannot understand why that would be, I cannot help you.
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 23, 2012, 8:49 PM
Post #31 of 71
(2910 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
happiegrrrl wrote: chadnsc wrote: Uh, you mean the campground? No, I mean a section where if women came in and said, of a guy upset because no matter how much he shakes, squeezes, flicks, the pee still runs down his leg, something like "Well you know...some people are into water sports." and then sent the guy a PM trying to hit on him, the comment would be deleted and she would get the mod smackdown. Yes - I know it is unnecessary. The post was a spontaneous attempt at humor. quote "ceebo"] 99% of topics on Rc venture off into the unkown, much like this one. Why, when it is a womens topics.. should it be any differant?. Are your issues more important than w/e issue was of any other topic?. Ofc.. yopu are a ''minority''.. clear the way guys. It is not that women's issues are more important. It is because without some moderation, the space would become unsafe for some of the women. If you cannot understand why that would be, I cannot help you. I do not understand but please explain
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 23, 2012, 9:00 PM
Post #32 of 71
(2902 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
ceebo wrote: happiegrrrl wrote: chadnsc wrote: Uh, you mean the campground? No, I mean a section where if women came in and said, of a guy upset because no matter how much he shakes, squeezes, flicks, the pee still runs down his leg, something like "Well you know...some people are into water sports." and then sent the guy a PM trying to hit on him, the comment would be deleted and she would get the mod smackdown. Yes - I know it is unnecessary. The post was a spontaneous attempt at humor. ceebo wrote: 99% of topics on Rc venture off into the unkown, much like this one. Why, when it is a womens topics.. should it be any differant?. Are your issues more important than w/e issue was of any other topic?. Ofc.. yopu are a ''minority''.. clear the way guys. It is not that women's issues are more important. It is because without some moderation, the space would become unsafe for some of the women. If you cannot understand why that would be, I cannot help you. I do not understand but please explain Explain what, how to properly quote a post?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Mar 24, 2012, 6:34 PM
Post #38 of 71
(2794 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
ceebo wrote: Fine by me, these forums are dead anyway under any other circumstance than flame wars. They are what they are, because of posters like you. As they say, don't let the door hit you....yata yata yata.... Josh
|
|
|
|
|
crjanow
Mar 24, 2012, 6:43 PM
Post #39 of 71
(2787 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 18, 2008
Posts: 69
|
granite_grrl wrote: ceebo wrote: wonderwoman wrote: ceebo wrote: ClimbOnSister wrote: If you like both, you should check out this site: http://www.climbonsister.com/ Training tips, humorous articles, women crushing rocks. Why would you look any further? All that time trying to gain equality... and look what you gone and done. We are not the ones keeping you down . You can't keep us down, and I can't understand your post. We're even, I suppose. The Op's website in regards to male/female equality is compareble to ''the cop stopped me coz i is black''. The fact that the car was flashing up stolen, just a detail. I do not see poeple here pointing out ''male'' spacific feets.. just individual feets that happen to be mostly from men. It gets on my fking nerves when women have to point out the fact that they are women. Btw, why is their a need to have a spacific women's sub forum on RC?. Another pointless and moronic devide.I respect women as equal.. so fking respect me back as it?... you don't need ''special'' treatments. Lets not stop their though. I suggest the following. Sub forums to be added: - For overweight people - For coulerd peoples - For disabled people Female climbers are a minority in this sport. Women are built different, we have periods and the ability to have babies, we have different training needs in the sence we have different strengths and weaknessnes because of our bodies. In reply to: It can also be hard to find practical gear and clothing that work for rock and ice climbing. They just don't make the same amount of stuff for women as they do for men, or at least the stores don't carry the same selection. And even when there is and it is carried it can be lower functionality for the sake of being "more attractive". funny i havent noticed that In reply to: We also look at issues differently. There are too many factors here to pin it down, but in general women tend to be more empathetic and more emotional (or at least show it more) than men. no shit!!! Editing is weak and Khoi is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 24, 2012, 7:21 PM
Post #40 of 71
(2775 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
ceebo wrote: That was good of you, as for the rest.. i guess your orginal post was a more ''mature'' way of directing negitivity personaly?. It's nice you have that ability. A person may say ''hey, fat guy'' i can picture you saying ''hey, gravity challenged guy''. I think this one may have tipped the scale for a ban ;/. To many narrow minded people here anyway. ::rolls eyes::
|
|
|
|
|
bigredscowboy
Mar 25, 2012, 2:51 AM
Post #42 of 71
(2724 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 30, 2007
Posts: 138
|
So... what was this thread about before ceebo assumed the position of unintelligible antagonist? To the OP, this thread has proved the need for moderation on your site. Keep up the good work on your end.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Mar 26, 2012, 2:13 PM
Post #43 of 71
(2610 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
Personal attacks and quotes of personal attacks have been hidden.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Mar 26, 2012, 2:45 PM
Post #45 of 71
(2590 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: ceebo wrote: Fine by me, these forums are dead anyway under any other circumstance than flame wars. They are what they are, because of posters like you. As they say, don't let the door hit you....yata yata yata.... Josh you forgot your patented or or or or I didn't feel ceebo was worthy of any expression.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Mar 26, 2012, 2:53 PM
Post #46 of 71
(2586 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: ceebo wrote: Fine by me, these forums are dead anyway under any other circumstance than flame wars. They are what they are, because of posters like you. As they say, don't let the door hit you....yata yata yata.... Josh you forgot your patented or or or or I didn't feel ceebo was worthy of any expression. ah, well, in that case, thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Mar 26, 2012, 5:07 PM
Post #48 of 71
(2535 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
happiegrrrl wrote: ceebo wrote: And i still think that having a women only forum that is basically saying ''men stay out'' is utter bull shit. Any issues women have should be openly discussed so that more poeple have a chance to understand and accept them. p.s happygrrl, you make no5. Your insight("men stay out") is incorrect. The Ladies Room is not a women-only section. It is simply a place where women-specific issues may be posted in a place that has a higher degree of moderation than the General section. The reason is, that in less-moderated sections, woman-specific threads have been shown to be degraded by remarks made by some users. In General, a woman posting about issues like "Why are the guys hitting on me? I just want to climb?" is going to get at least ONE "useless without pics" type response, and likely will be a lot worse. In the Ladies Room, the chances of that occurring are less, due to the moderation, and when/if it does, the remark will be removed, which helps the thread stay on topic. Men are welcome in the Ladies Room, and often participate. On the other hand, I would really like to see a Men's Room section. I wish RC.com would add it. Male-bashing or "useless without pics" type posts by women would not be tolerated; it would be interesting to watch the section evolve. Do you realize that by adding the second half of your post you completely undercut the otherwise excellent first half? It's like you wanted to demonstrate that you actually don't have a clue as to why there is a Ladies Room, even though you (clearly) do. ??? GO
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 26, 2012, 6:15 PM
Post #49 of 71
(2516 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
cracklover wrote: happiegrrrl wrote: ceebo wrote: And i still think that having a women only forum that is basically saying ''men stay out'' is utter bull shit. Any issues women have should be openly discussed so that more poeple have a chance to understand and accept them. p.s happygrrl, you make no5. Your insight("men stay out") is incorrect. The Ladies Room is not a women-only section. It is simply a place where women-specific issues may be posted in a place that has a higher degree of moderation than the General section. The reason is, that in less-moderated sections, woman-specific threads have been shown to be degraded by remarks made by some users. In General, a woman posting about issues like "Why are the guys hitting on me? I just want to climb?" is going to get at least ONE "useless without pics" type response, and likely will be a lot worse. In the Ladies Room, the chances of that occurring are less, due to the moderation, and when/if it does, the remark will be removed, which helps the thread stay on topic. Men are welcome in the Ladies Room, and often participate. On the other hand, I would really like to see a Men's Room section. I wish RC.com would add it. Male-bashing or "useless without pics" type posts by women would not be tolerated; it would be interesting to watch the section evolve. Do you realize that by adding the second half of your post you completely undercut the otherwise excellent first half? It's like you wanted to demonstrate that you actually don't have a clue as to why there is a Ladies Room, even though you (clearly) do. ??? GO Com on cracklover, stop trying to bring reasoning and understanding into this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Marylandclimber
Mar 26, 2012, 7:40 PM
Post #50 of 71
(2488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 3, 2011
Posts: 224
|
Who cares just climb...
|
|
|
|
|
Marylandclimber
Mar 26, 2012, 10:04 PM
Post #52 of 71
(3640 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 3, 2011
Posts: 224
|
Its just who cares what gender or race or overweight. Everyone has there own style of climbing. Women are great climbers and so as men. The only difference might be the style in which they climb but that's not a big deal.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 27, 2012, 1:40 AM
Post #53 of 71
(3609 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
Marylandclimber wrote: Its just who cares what gender or race or overweight. Everyone has there own style of climbing. Women are great climbers and so as men. The only difference might be the style in which they climb but that's not a big deal. You're right, little things like style, technique, center of gravity, height, reach, hip flexibility, hand size, weight, and muscle mass are exactly the same in men and women. I mean except that whole style thing which you pointed out those other things don't effect your climbing at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Marylandclimber
Mar 27, 2012, 1:42 AM
Post #54 of 71
(3608 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 3, 2011
Posts: 224
|
Your thinking too much... Were all good just climb...
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 27, 2012, 2:02 AM
Post #55 of 71
(3596 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
Marylandclimber wrote: Your thinking too much... Were all good just climb... ... and you're failing to see the obvious. Look, I never disputed your second comment but . . . Grades are subjective People are different There is nothing wrong with being different.
|
|
|
|
|
happiegrrrl
Mar 27, 2012, 4:00 AM
Post #56 of 71
(3577 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660
|
cracklover wrote: Do you realize that by adding the second half of your post you completely undercut the otherwise excellent first half? It's like you wanted to demonstrate that you actually don't have a clue as to why there is a Ladies Room, even though you (clearly) do. ??? GO No, I don't see how that is the case, and would be interested in your perspective. I was actually just taking a stab at humor, and imagining guys running with the scissors that would be the novelty of having a men's room forum. I do not actually think a men's room forum is needed or would have much in the way of seriousness if one were, for some reason, implemented.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Mar 27, 2012, 3:05 PM
Post #57 of 71
(3540 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
happiegrrrl wrote: cracklover wrote: Do you realize that by adding the second half of your post you completely undercut the otherwise excellent first half? It's like you wanted to demonstrate that you actually don't have a clue as to why there is a Ladies Room, even though you (clearly) do. ??? GO No, I don't see how that is the case, and would be interested in your perspective. I was actually just taking a stab at humor, and imagining guys running with the scissors that would be the novelty of having a men's room forum. I do not actually think a men's room forum is needed or would have much in the way of seriousness if one were, for some reason, implemented. - Because no-one wants one - Because if one existed, it would be nothing like what you imagine/describe - Because the men of the forum do not have the needs that such a forum fills - Because your (seemingly serious) suggestion makes it seem as though your are oblivious to the three points above. - Because if you can't tell the difference, you don't really understand why the women's forum would be helpful to some women here. Oh, and sorry, your humor didn't really come across. GO
|
|
|
|
|
happiegrrrl
Mar 27, 2012, 3:25 PM
Post #58 of 71
(3533 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660
|
cracklover wrote: - Because no-one wants one - Because if one existed, it would be nothing like what you imagine/describe - Because the men of the forum do not have the needs that such a forum fills - Because your (seemingly serious) suggestion makes it seem as though your are oblivious to the three points above. - Because if you can't tell the difference, you don't really understand why the women's forum would be helpful to some women here. Oh, and sorry, your humor didn't really come across. GO Jeez - apparently not! You've got no emoticons going on there, GO, but it seems you are a little wound up on this one.... You may not have noticed, but I'm been known to give the smackdown to people(men and women alike) who minimize/intimidate and otherwise attack women on this forum for voicing concerns which would be "ladies room-appropriate"). I am not the enemy here, when it comes to female empowerment.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Mar 27, 2012, 4:12 PM
Post #59 of 71
(3514 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
happiegrrrl wrote: cracklover wrote: - Because no-one wants one - Because if one existed, it would be nothing like what you imagine/describe - Because the men of the forum do not have the needs that such a forum fills - Because your (seemingly serious) suggestion makes it seem as though your are oblivious to the three points above. - Because if you can't tell the difference, you don't really understand why the women's forum would be helpful to some women here. Oh, and sorry, your humor didn't really come across. GO Jeez - apparently not! You've got no emoticons going on there, GO, but it seems you are a little wound up on this one.... You may not have noticed, but I'm been known to give the smackdown to people(men and women alike) who minimize/intimidate and otherwise attack women on this forum for voicing concerns which would be "ladies room-appropriate"). I am not the enemy here, when it comes to female empowerment. Huh? I'm not wound up. You seemed honestly puzzled, and asked me to explain, so I did. I never said you were the enemy. As I said, you clearly know why the forum is here. I was simply pointing out that you totally undercut your own argument. Cheers, GO
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Mar 27, 2012, 5:26 PM
Post #60 of 71
(3498 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
cracklover wrote: happiegrrrl wrote: cracklover wrote: - Because no-one wants one - Because if one existed, it would be nothing like what you imagine/describe - Because the men of the forum do not have the needs that such a forum fills - Because your (seemingly serious) suggestion makes it seem as though your are oblivious to the three points above. - Because if you can't tell the difference, you don't really understand why the women's forum would be helpful to some women here. Oh, and sorry, your humor didn't really come across. GO Jeez - apparently not! You've got no emoticons going on there, GO, but it seems you are a little wound up on this one.... You may not have noticed, but I'm been known to give the smackdown to people(men and women alike) who minimize/intimidate and otherwise attack women on this forum for voicing concerns which would be "ladies room-appropriate"). I am not the enemy here, when it comes to female empowerment. Huh? I'm not wound up. You seemed honestly puzzled, and asked me to explain, so I did. I never said you were the enemy. As I said, you clearly know why the forum is here. I was simply pointing out that you totally undercut your own argument. Cheers, GO Your tone comes across like you are. The big indicators I was picking up on that lead me to believe the same thing are: The repetitive use of because comes off as condescending. The use of "you don't really understand" is a pretty harsh judgement, based on a couple of sentences, of someone's ability to conceptualize an issue.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Mar 27, 2012, 7:58 PM
Post #61 of 71
(3458 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
shockabuku wrote: cracklover wrote: happiegrrrl wrote: cracklover wrote: - Because no-one wants one - Because if one existed, it would be nothing like what you imagine/describe - Because the men of the forum do not have the needs that such a forum fills - Because your (seemingly serious) suggestion makes it seem as though your are oblivious to the three points above. - Because if you can't tell the difference, you don't really understand why the women's forum would be helpful to some women here. Oh, and sorry, your humor didn't really come across. GO Jeez - apparently not! You've got no emoticons going on there, GO, but it seems you are a little wound up on this one.... You may not have noticed, but I'm been known to give the smackdown to people(men and women alike) who minimize/intimidate and otherwise attack women on this forum for voicing concerns which would be "ladies room-appropriate"). I am not the enemy here, when it comes to female empowerment. Huh? I'm not wound up. You seemed honestly puzzled, and asked me to explain, so I did. I never said you were the enemy. As I said, you clearly know why the forum is here. I was simply pointing out that you totally undercut your own argument. Cheers, GO Your tone comes across like you are. The big indicators I was picking up on that lead me to believe the same thing are: The repetitive use of because comes off as condescending. The use of "you don't really understand" is a pretty harsh judgement, based on a couple of sentences, of someone's ability to conceptualize an issue. Hahaha! Touche! Anyway, sorry it came across that way. Was just trying to be matter-of-fact about it. Oh and I hate to belabor the point, but for whatever it's worth - "you don't really understand..." was not a judgement of HG. It was saying that: "if the writer couldn't see the above, then she would not understand..." Of course HG does see the above, but was writing as if she didn't. Which was odd - but I get that it was supposed to be humorous. Cheers, G
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 27, 2012, 10:05 PM
Post #62 of 71
(3433 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
chadnsc wrote: Marylandclimber wrote: Its just who cares what gender or race or overweight. Everyone has there own style of climbing. Women are great climbers and so as men. The only difference might be the style in which they climb but that's not a big deal. You're right, little things like style, technique, center of gravity, height, reach, hip flexibility, hand size, weight, and muscle mass are exactly the same in men and women. I mean except that whole style thing which you pointed out those other things don't effect your climbing at all. Most of the points you make are not the same from person to person so god only knows how you go about defining them from man to woman. I repeat, most of them. http://mandingueira.com/...upper-body-strength/ Granite girl,If at all valid then this link is interesting for you. Says to me that women do not need to train differantly to men at all.
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Mar 28, 2012, 12:18 AM
Post #63 of 71
(3412 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
ceebo wrote: chadnsc wrote: Marylandclimber wrote: Its just who cares what gender or race or overweight. Everyone has there own style of climbing. Women are great climbers and so as men. The only difference might be the style in which they climb but that's not a big deal. You're right, little things like style, technique, center of gravity, height, reach, hip flexibility, hand size, weight, and muscle mass are exactly the same in men and women. I mean except that whole style thing which you pointed out those other things don't effect your climbing at all. Most of the points you make are not the same from person to person so god only knows how you go about defining them from man to woman. I repeat, most of them. http://mandingueira.com/...upper-body-strength/ Granite girl,If at all valid then this link is interesting for you. Says to me that women do not need to train differantly to men at all. Who ever said the same basic principles of building muscle mass works different for men than it does for women? In my experience though most women (myself included) don't start off at the same strength to weight ratio as men do. You then see women struggling on steep and burly routes and problems that the guy who just started climbing with her is monkey barring up. Now this is totally a stereo type, but I think we can all relate to the young guy new to climbing muscling his way up routes at the gym. The other stereo type is the woman who takes well to the delicate vertical faces. The problem is that strength begets strength and you get these ladies who have been climbing for a couple of years complaining how hard overhanging faces are (myself included back then). Meanwhile the guy hasn't really gained much technique from his monkey barring (though instead of complaining how hard slabby walls are he normally just wallows in the world of 5.10 at this point). Everyone should work on their weaknesses and man and women tend to develop different weaknesses when they start climbing (it's WAY more fun to cater to your strengths). So yes, I think these two stereotypes need to train differently.
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 28, 2012, 2:16 AM
Post #64 of 71
(3389 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
granite_grrl wrote: ceebo wrote: chadnsc wrote: Marylandclimber wrote: Its just who cares what gender or race or overweight. Everyone has there own style of climbing. Women are great climbers and so as men. The only difference might be the style in which they climb but that's not a big deal. You're right, little things like style, technique, center of gravity, height, reach, hip flexibility, hand size, weight, and muscle mass are exactly the same in men and women. I mean except that whole style thing which you pointed out those other things don't effect your climbing at all. Most of the points you make are not the same from person to person so god only knows how you go about defining them from man to woman. I repeat, most of them. http://mandingueira.com/...upper-body-strength/ Granite girl,If at all valid then this link is interesting for you. Says to me that women do not need to train differantly to men at all. Who ever said the same basic principles of building muscle mass works different for men than it does for women? In my experience though most women (myself included) don't start off at the same strength to weight ratio as men do. You then see women struggling on steep and burly routes and problems that the guy who just started climbing with her is monkey barring up. Now this is totally a stereo type, but I think we can all relate to the young guy new to climbing muscling his way up routes at the gym. The other stereo type is the woman who takes well to the delicate vertical faces. The problem is that strength begets strength and you get these ladies who have been climbing for a couple of years complaining how hard overhanging faces are (myself included back then). Meanwhile the guy hasn't really gained much technique from his monkey barring (though instead of complaining how hard slabby walls are he normally just wallows in the world of 5.10 at this point). Everyone should work on their weaknesses and man and women tend to develop different weaknesses when they start climbing (it's WAY more fun to cater to your strengths). So yes, I think these two stereotypes need to train differently. The link was in effort to be helpful not to argue against something you think you said. The rest of your post is just rediculess. In context of climbers who have climbed for a few month perhaps you are more right than wrong.. but the exceptions even in those are thousands of people. One thing that is most true is women on over hangs, or more so the lack of. The worst part here is that you assume women get some god given vert and slab technique. Slab, vert, overhang, being the common angles in climbing do not fully pass over to each other. No 8a on sight level vert or slab climber will ever jump on a 8a overhang and complete it. I garuntee it. On the other hand.. a 8a on sight over hang climber will stand a very good chance at doing the compareble slab/vert. Its simple why. Slab climbing has the smallest learning curve, its emphisis is more on technique than strength. You can do it over and over with ought muscles packing in, its not hard to learn. Over hangs though, the inherent physical strain that come with them make angle spacific technique consolidation much harder. You get less time to practice due to physical fatigue dictating the pace. What you are trying to say is that men need to start climbing more slab and so so?.. wrong. Both men and women need to climb a mix of all.. but with the majority of time going to over hang, some to vert.. a little to slab. That is ofc, in the mindset of a climber wishing to be good at all. I left roof climbing and other styles out for simplicity.
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Mar 28, 2012, 11:37 AM
Post #65 of 71
(3371 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
ceebo wrote: granite_grrl wrote: ceebo wrote: chadnsc wrote: Marylandclimber wrote: Its just who cares what gender or race or overweight. Everyone has there own style of climbing. Women are great climbers and so as men. The only difference might be the style in which they climb but that's not a big deal. You're right, little things like style, technique, center of gravity, height, reach, hip flexibility, hand size, weight, and muscle mass are exactly the same in men and women. I mean except that whole style thing which you pointed out those other things don't effect your climbing at all. Most of the points you make are not the same from person to person so god only knows how you go about defining them from man to woman. I repeat, most of them. http://mandingueira.com/...upper-body-strength/ Granite girl,If at all valid then this link is interesting for you. Says to me that women do not need to train differantly to men at all. Who ever said the same basic principles of building muscle mass works different for men than it does for women? In my experience though most women (myself included) don't start off at the same strength to weight ratio as men do. You then see women struggling on steep and burly routes and problems that the guy who just started climbing with her is monkey barring up. Now this is totally a stereo type, but I think we can all relate to the young guy new to climbing muscling his way up routes at the gym. The other stereo type is the woman who takes well to the delicate vertical faces. The problem is that strength begets strength and you get these ladies who have been climbing for a couple of years complaining how hard overhanging faces are (myself included back then). Meanwhile the guy hasn't really gained much technique from his monkey barring (though instead of complaining how hard slabby walls are he normally just wallows in the world of 5.10 at this point). Everyone should work on their weaknesses and man and women tend to develop different weaknesses when they start climbing (it's WAY more fun to cater to your strengths). So yes, I think these two stereotypes need to train differently. The link was in effort to be helpful not to argue against something you think you said. The rest of your post is just rediculess. In context of climbers who have climbed for a few month perhaps you are more right than wrong.. but the exceptions even in those are thousands of people. One thing that is most true is women on over hangs, or more so the lack of. The worst part here is that you assume women get some god given vert and slab technique. Slab, vert, overhang, being the common angles in climbing do not fully pass over to each other. No 8a on sight level vert or slab climber will ever jump on a 8a overhang and complete it. I garuntee it. On the other hand.. a 8a on sight over hang climber will stand a very good chance at doing the compareble slab/vert. Its simple why. Slab climbing has the smallest learning curve, its emphisis is more on technique than strength. You can do it over and over with ought muscles packing in, its not hard to learn. Over hangs though, the inherent physical strain that come with them make angle spacific technique consolidation much harder. You get less time to practice due to physical fatigue dictating the pace. What you are trying to say is that men need to start climbing more slab and so so?.. wrong. Both men and women need to climb a mix of all.. but with the majority of time going to over hang, some to vert.. a little to slab. That is ofc, in the mindset of a climber wishing to be good at all. I left roof climbing and other styles out for simplicity. I have no idea what you're trying to say here. That slab and verticle climbing is easy? I think that all depends on your strengths and weaknesses.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 28, 2012, 1:39 PM
Post #66 of 71
(3345 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
ceebo wrote: Most of the points you make are not the same from person to person so god only knows how you go about defining them from man to woman. I repeat, most of them. http://mandingueira.com/...upper-body-strength/ Granite girl,If at all valid then this link is interesting for you. Says to me that women do not need to train differantly to men at all. Here I thought you got a time out. Guess you just ran away and hid for a couple days.
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Mar 28, 2012, 1:47 PM
Post #67 of 71
(3341 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
It's all good. I'm trying to develop a better understanding of unintended tones in my own writing so that I don't piss people off at work!
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 28, 2012, 4:17 PM
Post #68 of 71
(3297 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
granite_grrl wrote: I have no idea what you're trying to say here. That slab and verticle climbing is easy? I think that all depends on your strengths and weaknesses. No.. slab and vert is not ''easy'' but in comparison to over hang, they are far easier to get more miledge on, for physical reasons i already pointed out. More miledge >> better chance to learn in that style. Slab skill deminishes FAST, i already said why in other post. You are under some silly illusion that climbers who are strong on over hangs (that you associate with half shaven ape men who have no grasp of technique) can not also be just as good and have the required technique attributes associated with slab climbing under their belt. My slab climbing ability has always matched w/e my max grade was on other styles yet i rarely climb slab in comparison. The learning curve technique wise in climbing slab was not small, but due to the lack of physical aspects involved (that i again pointed out) it makes for endless miledge to ge that shit done and move on. Once you have a good idea how to climb slab and even vert you then just venture into route spacific moves. The underlining factor from their on out IMO is physical condition to allow more time to refine and attempt those spacific moves. Overhang climbing comes with the pro of giving you the physical condition to eliminate as a weakness in the other styles. Has it registered?.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 28, 2012, 4:36 PM
Post #69 of 71
(3286 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
ceebo wrote: granite_grrl wrote: I have no idea what you're trying to say here. That slab and verticle climbing is easy? I think that all depends on your strengths and weaknesses. No.. slab and vert is not ''easy'' but in comparison to over hang, they are far easier to get more miledge on, for physical reasons i already pointed out. More miledge >> better chance to learn in that style. Slab skill deminishes FAST, i already said why in other post. Spray deleted. Has it registered?. Ceebo you really should run away and hide again.
|
|
|
|
|
ceebo
Mar 28, 2012, 6:41 PM
Post #70 of 71
(3254 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862
|
chadnsc wrote: ceebo wrote: granite_grrl wrote: I have no idea what you're trying to say here. That slab and verticle climbing is easy? I think that all depends on your strengths and weaknesses. No.. slab and vert is not ''easy'' but in comparison to over hang, they are far easier to get more miledge on, for physical reasons i already pointed out. More miledge >> better chance to learn in that style. Slab skill deminishes FAST, i already said why in other post. Spray deleted. Has it registered?. Ceebo you really should run away and hide again. You try so hard, go ahead and count this as a bite. It's kinde funy that the steroe type granite described probably applys to you. In that light im not suprised at what you would consider spray. Kill file me?.. instead of coming across like you crave my attention.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 28, 2012, 9:00 PM
Post #71 of 71
(3225 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
Craving your attention, meh. Wanting you to go away, yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|