|
pinktricam
Jan 9, 2013, 4:24 AM
Post #1 of 31
(17819 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
Ten years (and counting) today and some of you assholes would be lost without me.
I could name names, but I'm a better person than that.
|
|
|
|
|
epoch
Moderator
Jan 9, 2013, 2:46 PM
Post #2 of 31
(17744 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163
|
Name them names. I dare you.
|
|
|
|
|
iknowfear
Jan 9, 2013, 8:03 PM
Post #3 of 31
(17722 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670
|
pinktricam wrote: Ten years (and counting) today and some of you assholes would be lost without me. I could name names, but I'm a better person than that.
unless you invented GPS or EPIRB, I doubt that claim.
cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
pinktricam
Jan 11, 2013, 10:52 AM
Post #4 of 31
(17682 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
epoch wrote: Name them names. I dare you.
The Minnesota moron for one. She knows who she is.
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Jan 11, 2013, 6:35 PM
Post #5 of 31
(17670 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
pinktricam wrote: epoch wrote: Name them names. I dare you. The Minnesota moron for one. She knows who she is.
the love affair continues
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Jan 11, 2013, 9:09 PM
Post #6 of 31
(17662 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
I hope I made the list. Otherwise, I don't know what I'd do with myself.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 13, 2013, 10:50 PM
Post #7 of 31
(17624 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
I guess pinkies desperate for attention Ma.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 13, 2013, 10:52 PM
Post #8 of 31
(17617 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
epoch wrote: Name them names. I dare you.
He's too scared to; it's the internet and all he has to use are his words.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Jan 18, 2013, 9:04 PM
Post #9 of 31
(17570 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
holy moly. 10 years here. who woulda thought?
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 18, 2013, 9:23 PM
Post #10 of 31
(17563 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
petsfed wrote: I hope I made the list. Otherwise, I don't know what I'd do with myself.
You didn't make the list. Don't worry though, it's really just a ploy for PCT to try and get in your pants.
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Jan 19, 2013, 4:03 AM
Post #11 of 31
(17548 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
chadnsc wrote: petsfed wrote: I hope I made the list. Otherwise, I don't know what I'd do with myself. You didn't make the list. Don't worry though, it's really just a ploy for PCT to try and get in your pants.
Well, that's flattering. I guess pink isn't a roses and chocolate kind of guy then?
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 20, 2013, 1:38 AM
Post #12 of 31
(17529 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
petsfed wrote: chadnsc wrote: petsfed wrote: I hope I made the list. Otherwise, I don't know what I'd do with myself. You didn't make the list. Don't worry though, it's really just a ploy for PCT to try and get in your pants. Well, that's flattering. I guess pink isn't a roses and chocolate kind of guy then?
Nope. He's more of a gunz and duck tape kind of guy.
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jan 21, 2013, 7:07 PM
Post #13 of 31
(17507 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
chadnsc wrote: petsfed wrote: chadnsc wrote: petsfed wrote: I hope I made the list. Otherwise, I don't know what I'd do with myself. You didn't make the list. Don't worry though, it's really just a ploy for PCT to try and get in your pants. Well, that's flattering. I guess pink isn't a roses and chocolate kind of guy then? Nope. He's more of a gunz and duck tape kind of guy.
Ooohh! I wanna play too!
|
|
|
|
|
jules
Jan 22, 2013, 4:44 AM
Post #14 of 31
(17485 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 1, 2001
Posts: 3099
|
2003? Pfft...
|
|
|
|
|
pinktricam
Jan 22, 2013, 11:46 AM
Post #15 of 31
(17472 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
jules wrote: 2003? Pfft...
Hey, jules....long time.
There are some scientists looking for an adventurous woman to have a Neanderthal baby. That's right up your ally!
|
|
|
|
|
jules
Jan 22, 2013, 7:04 PM
Post #16 of 31
(17456 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 1, 2001
Posts: 3099
|
It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility?
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jan 22, 2013, 8:47 PM
Post #17 of 31
(17446 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility?
Ewwww.... I dont like where this is going
|
|
|
|
|
pinktricam
Jan 23, 2013, 10:40 PM
Post #18 of 31
(17427 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility?
Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher?
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 24, 2013, 2:03 PM
Post #19 of 31
(17413 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
pinktricam wrote: jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility? Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher?
Classy to the end. Could you please not be such a crass jerk?
(This post was edited by chadnsc on Jan 24, 2013, 4:17 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 24, 2013, 2:07 PM
Post #20 of 31
(17410 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility?
Five stars!
|
|
|
|
|
jules
Jan 24, 2013, 6:57 PM
Post #21 of 31
(17389 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 1, 2001
Posts: 3099
|
pinktricam wrote: jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility? Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher?
You know, I never have been before, but for you, I'd consider it.
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Jan 24, 2013, 7:37 PM
Post #22 of 31
(17386 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
jules wrote: pinktricam wrote: Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher? You know, I never have been before, but for you, I'd consider it.
trophy
Its the Groucho Marx of the 2010s
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 24, 2013, 7:42 PM
Post #23 of 31
(17382 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
jules wrote: pinktricam wrote: jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility? Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher? You know, I never have been before, but for you, I'd consider it.
Jules you win. PCT, you loose.
|
|
|
|
|
pinktricam
Jan 30, 2013, 5:41 AM
Post #24 of 31
(17343 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
jules wrote: pinktricam wrote: jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility? Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher? You know, I never have been before, but for you, I'd consider it.
So you're not the lesbian (bi?) amateur entomologist then?
|
|
|
|
|
clymbrchk
Feb 25, 2013, 9:34 PM
Post #25 of 31
(17249 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2007
Posts: 115
|
pinktricam wrote: Ten years (and counting) today and some of you assholes would be lost without me. I could name names, but I'm a better person than that.
Damn, that makes it sound like a long time. Did I make the list? I <3 lists.
Editted to observe that my register date is in 2007. Weird. I'm pretty sure that I went out on my first climbing trip with you suckers in 2002.
Hmm, maybe I've been hacked.
(This post was edited by clymbrchk on Feb 25, 2013, 9:36 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
wideguy
Apr 4, 2013, 4:36 PM
Post #27 of 31
(2215 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 9, 2003
Posts: 15046
|
Dang. I'm over 10 years. But not really.
Glad Jules' post is one of the few I caught ;)
|
|
|
|
|
rendog
Jun 14, 2013, 9:09 PM
Post #28 of 31
(2152 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 2468
|
epoch wrote: Name them names. I dare you.
Hell I triple dog dare you mofo!!!
|
|
|
|
|
climber49er
Aug 27, 2013, 8:49 PM
Post #29 of 31
(2045 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
What a bunch of dirtbags. I guess it's time for me to change the thread title to "Who's been here for 10 years". Those 8 year noobs will never catch up.
|
|
|
|
|
brent_e
Dec 14, 2013, 6:07 PM
Post #30 of 31
(1947 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111
|
looks like it's 9 years for me. except the last 5 years that I haven't been here…..
|
|
|
|
|
climbingtrash
Dec 20, 2013, 5:22 AM
Post #31 of 31
(1923 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114
|
brent_e wrote: looks like it's 9 years for me. except the last 5 years that I haven't been here…..
Holy shit it's brent_e! If ewe haven't been here in 5 years ewe might be...
|
|
|
|
|
|
