Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Post deleted by adatesman
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 Next page Last page  View All


jrathfon


Jul 20, 2010, 6:07 PM
Post #26 of 111 (4036 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [donald949] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

donald949 wrote:
shimanilami wrote:
ANSWER: Jay should cut the rope.
Exactly. Although he could save time by just letting go, as I noticed his belay technique is pretty bad.
And Paul has it coming, as clearly it is his plan to drop Jay later by untieing.
Paul you are a bastard, dropping Jay after he held you. I will never climb with you. Mad

it's be pretty hard to untie a knot with 976 N of force holding it tight. i bet that bitch paul pulled a "touching the void" or "eiger nordwand" move, e.g. he cut jay's life off, snuffed him out in one deliberate slicing action.

edit argh!! i mean 976 N, the tension, duh.

MFPTFTWB!!!!!

pancakes.


(This post was edited by jrathfon on Jul 20, 2010, 6:09 PM)


adatesman


Jul 20, 2010, 6:10 PM
Post #27 of 111 (4032 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  

 


jrathfon


Jul 20, 2010, 6:12 PM
Post #28 of 111 (4028 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [adatesman] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
adatesman wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
not so fast

how did you get these #s?

Must have had a copy of the Teacher's edition. The Student edition only has answers to the odd-numbered questions in the back. Oh, the book is Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 3rd Edition by Tipler.

Um, no, I have no such thing. I just happen to be an engineer and know how to use sine... and the equations of motion.

Sorry, the smiley was intended to be implied! LaughSmile

pwned!!!


adatesman


Jul 20, 2010, 6:17 PM
Post #29 of 111 (4021 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  

 


majid_sabet


Jul 20, 2010, 6:21 PM
Post #30 of 111 (4017 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [adatesman] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

it would be interesting if we added USN as the third party falling on crevasse so now one person is holding two on a 40%
edit: add 10 meter between second and third


(This post was edited by majid_sabet on Jul 20, 2010, 6:22 PM)


jrathfon


Jul 20, 2010, 6:25 PM
Post #31 of 111 (4015 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [majid_sabet] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
it would be interesting if we added USN as the third party falling on crevasse so now one person is holding two on a 40%
edit: add 10 meter between second and third

there'd be two different accelerations due to two different tensions: one while both USN and Paul are falling, then another after USN craters, then get's landed on!

@adatesman: sucka!!!


majid_sabet


Jul 20, 2010, 7:35 PM
Post #32 of 111 (3990 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [jrathfon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jrathfon wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
it would be interesting if we added USN as the third party falling on crevasse so now one person is holding two on a 40%
edit: add 10 meter between second and third

there'd be two different accelerations due to two different tensions: one while both USN and Paul are falling, then another after USN craters, then get's landed on!

@adatesman: sucka!!!

so let's say we had A @ 70 kg, B at 55 KG and C at 60 Kg. ABC are walking on flat ice with 10 m rope in between(5 m slack between ABC) and a hole opens up and C gets pulled in to hole then 5 meter later B and now A is reaching the hole. how long before A kiss his as* goodbye ?

edit : or how long before B and how long before A deck


(This post was edited by majid_sabet on Jul 20, 2010, 7:37 PM)


jrathfon


Jul 20, 2010, 7:37 PM
Post #33 of 111 (3984 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [majid_sabet] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

with a frictionless surface, A's mass doesn't even matter!


jrathfon


Jul 20, 2010, 7:38 PM
Post #34 of 111 (3983 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [majid_sabet] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

also, how deeps the hole? eh?


desertwanderer81


Jul 20, 2010, 7:56 PM
Post #35 of 111 (3976 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 5, 2007
Posts: 2272

Re: [jrathfon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jrathfon wrote:
adatesman wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
aiight:

a) T = 976 N, and Paul decks at 6.47 m/s

b) assuming Paul chills before he cuts the rope and Jay is at rest, Jay craters at 20.7 m/s

so:

a) do i win a cookie

b) that's 14.5 and 46.3 mph respectively for all you 'mericans. aka Jay's getting screwed, why would Paul cut the rope? unless he's got some beef.

c) this all assumes they are in a vacuum.

not so fast

how did you get these #s?

Must have had a copy of the Teacher's edition. The Student edition only has answers to the odd-numbered questions in the back. Oh, the book is Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 3rd Edition by Tipler.

Um, no, I have no such thing. I just happen to be an engineer and know how to use sine... and the equations of motion.

p.s. Majid, I'm not going to let you cheat.

but, find the vector of force pulling on the rope from jay's weight, add that to paul's force (hint F=ma), there's your tension. subtract those two values to get the force paul is accelerating toward the ground with. calculate paul's acceleration and plug it into the EOM. voila time it takes paul to crate, thus you can back calculate his final velocity.

now, calculate the length of the slope, knowing it's 25 m tall at a 40deg incline (with sine). subtract 5 m from it, since there is still 5 m of rope left when paul crater's, now that's how far jay will slide. change that back into the vertical he will fall (again sine), since it's a frictionless slope. he will fall at 1G, again since it's a frictionless slope. now you know jay's cratering acceleration, EOM's, voila, dun.

I do not believe you are correct on the first part.

First off, in a static situation, tension is only calculated with the force on one object. IE, if you have two objects hanging dead off of a frictionless pulley, the total tension in your system will only be that of the weight of one of the objects, not both of the objects combined.

What I did (and there are probably errors in this, so bear with me:

Force on Paul from Gravity = 52*9.81=510.1
Force on Jay from Gravity = 74*9.81=725.94
Force directed downhill from Gravity on Jay = 725.94*Cos(50)=466.1N.

The net force on our system is 510.1-466.1=44N


Calculate the net acceleration:

F(net) = m(net) * a
44N = (52+74)*a
a = 0.349 m/s^2


Calculate the tension on the rope:

F(due to acceleration) = m(paul) * a

F(due to acceleration) = 74*.349 = 25.8N

466.1 + 25.8 = 491.9N

The tension on the rope is 491.9N


Calculate the speed at which Paul decks:


x= 1/2*a*t^2
25=.5*0.349^2
t = 11.97 seconds

V = a * t = 0.349 * 11.97 = 4.18 m/s

I could have made an error in there somewhere. If I did, please let me know!


(This post was edited by desertwanderer81 on Jul 20, 2010, 10:19 PM)


chadnsc


Jul 20, 2010, 8:12 PM
Post #36 of 111 (3968 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [majid_sabet] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Notice how Midget didn't answer the question but instead is asking one of his own where he controls the parameters and wording of said question?


CamCardon


Jul 20, 2010, 8:46 PM
Post #37 of 111 (3944 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2008
Posts: 11

Re: [adatesman] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
Remember when you'd post sets of climbing related problems for people to calculate the answer to? Well, I was flipping through one of my old physics textbooks last night and happened to notice this:



Obviously it needs more Red and Green Arrows, but not bad otherwise! Laugh

-a.


Oooh, this looks like a fun one.

a) The tension in the rope can be figured by adding the opposing forces on the rope, in this case, Paul and Jay. Pauls force on the rope is his full 52kg, but because Jay is on a slope, his will only be 47.565kg (74*sin40), Giving us 99.565kg of tension in the rope.

b) Because there is no friction, Paul will still fall at a rate of 9.81m/s^2, even though his effective mass is only 4.435kg. So if he falls the 20m, he will hit the ground at 19.809m/s. Jay is a very different case, because when Paul hits and unties (assuming instantaneous untying of a figure 8 that has just taken a fatty fall :p) then Jay will still be 5m from the top. At that moment, he will have the same velocity as Paul, 19.809m/s. Because he is going uphill, the force of gravity (Fg) will slow him down before he goes over the edge, with a force of 47.565kg. Using the equation F=ma (Force=Mass*Accelaration) we solve for a, giving us F/m=a, or 47.565/74=.643m/s^2. So Jay will have an initial velocity of 19.809m/s, and slow down with an accelaration of -.643m/s^2, leaving him going 19.646m/s at the point of the mountain. Now, when he takes off, he will be traveling upward at an angle of 40 degrees. With a little trig, we find his upward velocity to be 12.628m/s, and his horizontal to be 15.050m/s. Gravity will slow him down at a rate of 9.81m/s^2, which using the equation Vf^2= Vi^2 + 2ax, solved for x, being Vf^2-Vi^2/2a= x, he will travel a full 8.12m upward before he stops midair. This will put him a total of 33.12m above the ground, so when he hits, the vertical component of his velocity will be 25.491m/s. Because of his horizontal velocity, and since he spent a full 3.877 seconds in the air, he will be 58.5 meters away from Paul when he hits the ground, and his resultant velocity will be 29.602m/s, striking at an angle of 59.4 degrees. So Paul will be going 19.809m/s (44.3mi/h), and Jay will be going 29.602m/s (66.2 mi/h)

I hope that made sense and is correct. Either way, their both gonna be pretty messed up, if not dead, after this "predicament"


jrathfon


Jul 20, 2010, 8:54 PM
Post #38 of 111 (3939 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [desertwanderer81] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

desertwanderer81 wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
adatesman wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
aiight:

a) T = 976 N, and Paul decks at 6.47 m/s

b) assuming Paul chills before he cuts the rope and Jay is at rest, Jay craters at 20.7 m/s

so:

a) do i win a cookie

b) that's 14.5 and 46.3 mph respectively for all you 'mericans. aka Jay's getting screwed, why would Paul cut the rope? unless he's got some beef.

c) this all assumes they are in a vacuum.

not so fast

how did you get these #s?

Must have had a copy of the Teacher's edition. The Student edition only has answers to the odd-numbered questions in the back. Oh, the book is Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 3rd Edition by Tipler.

Um, no, I have no such thing. I just happen to be an engineer and know how to use sine... and the equations of motion.

p.s. Majid, I'm not going to let you cheat.

but, find the vector of force pulling on the rope from jay's weight, add that to paul's force (hint F=ma), there's your tension. subtract those two values to get the force paul is accelerating toward the ground with. calculate paul's acceleration and plug it into the EOM. voila time it takes paul to crate, thus you can back calculate his final velocity.

now, calculate the length of the slope, knowing it's 25 m tall at a 40deg incline (with sine). subtract 5 m from it, since there is still 5 m of rope left when paul crater's, now that's how far jay will slide. change that back into the vertical he will fall (again sine), since it's a frictionless slope. he will fall at 1G, again since it's a frictionless slope. now you know jay's cratering acceleration, EOM's, voila, dun.

I do not believe you are correct on the first part.

First off, in a static situation, tension is only calculated with the force on one object. IE, if you have two objects hanging dead off of a frictionless pulley, the total tension in your system will only be that of the weight of one of the objects, not both of the objects combined.

What I did (and there are probably errors in this, so bear with me:

Force on Jay from Gravity = 52*9.81=510.1
Force on Paul from Gravity = 74*9.81=725.94
Force directed downhill from Gravity on Paul = 725.94*Cos(50)=466.1N.

The net force on our system is 510.1-466.1=44N


Calculate the net acceleration:

F(net) = m(net) * a
44N = (52+74)*a
a = 0.349 m/s^2


Calculate the tension on the rope:

F(due to acceleration) = m(paul) * a

F(due to acceleration) = 74*.349 = 25.8N

466.1 + 25.8 = 491.9N

The tension on the rope is 491.9N


Calculate the speed at which Jay decks:


x= 1/2*a*t^2
25=.5*0.349^2
t = 11.97 seconds

V = a * t = 0.349 * 11.97 = 4.18 m/s

I could have made an error in there somewhere. If I did, please let me know!

go check out the simple force diagram on any climbing pulley and report back.

thanks.

you got the net force paul is falling with correct however. thus you can get paul's acceleration.


jrathfon


Jul 20, 2010, 8:54 PM
Post #39 of 111 (3938 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [CamCardon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

CamCardon wrote:
adatesman wrote:
Remember when you'd post sets of climbing related problems for people to calculate the answer to? Well, I was flipping through one of my old physics textbooks last night and happened to notice this:



Obviously it needs more Red and Green Arrows, but not bad otherwise! Laugh

-a.


Oooh, this looks like a fun one.

a) The tension in the rope can be figured by adding the opposing forces on the rope, in this case, Paul and Jay. Pauls force on the rope is his full 52kg, but because Jay is on a slope, his will only be 47.565kg (74*sin40), Giving us 99.565kg of tension in the rope.

b) Because there is no friction, Paul will still fall at a rate of 9.81m/s^2, even though his effective mass is only 4.435kg. So if he falls the 20m, he will hit the ground at 19.809m/s. Jay is a very different case, because when Paul hits and unties (assuming instantaneous untying of a figure 8 that has just taken a fatty fall :p) then Jay will still be 5m from the top. At that moment, he will have the same velocity as Paul, 19.809m/s. Because he is going uphill, the force of gravity (Fg) will slow him down before he goes over the edge, with a force of 47.565kg. Using the equation F=ma (Force=Mass*Accelaration) we solve for a, giving us F/m=a, or 47.565/74=.643m/s^2. So Jay will have an initial velocity of 19.809m/s, and slow down with an accelaration of -.643m/s^2, leaving him going 19.646m/s at the point of the mountain. Now, when he takes off, he will be traveling upward at an angle of 40 degrees. With a little trig, we find his upward velocity to be 12.628m/s, and his horizontal to be 15.050m/s. Gravity will slow him down at a rate of 9.81m/s^2, which using the equation Vf^2= Vi^2 + 2ax, solved for x, being Vf^2-Vi^2/2a= x, he will travel a full 8.12m upward before he stops midair. This will put him a total of 33.12m above the ground, so when he hits, the vertical component of his velocity will be 25.491m/s. Because of his horizontal velocity, and since he spent a full 3.877 seconds in the air, he will be 58.5 meters away from Paul when he hits the ground, and his resultant velocity will be 29.602m/s, striking at an angle of 59.4 degrees. So Paul will be going 19.809m/s (44.3mi/h), and Jay will be going 29.602m/s (66.2 mi/h)

I hope that made sense and is correct. Either way, their both gonna be pretty messed up, if not dead, after this "predicament"

kg of tension? sweet jebus!


CamCardon


Jul 20, 2010, 8:57 PM
Post #40 of 111 (3934 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2008
Posts: 11

Re: [jrathfon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jrathfon wrote:

kg of tension? sweet jebus!

Sorry, 976N :p


jrathfon


Jul 20, 2010, 8:59 PM
Post #41 of 111 (3931 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [CamCardon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

CamCardon wrote:
adatesman wrote:
Remember when you'd post sets of climbing related problems for people to calculate the answer to? Well, I was flipping through one of my old physics textbooks last night and happened to notice this:



Obviously it needs more Red and Green Arrows, but not bad otherwise! Laugh

-a.


Oooh, this looks like a fun one.

a) The tension in the rope can be figured by adding the opposing forces on the rope, in this case, Paul and Jay. Pauls force on the rope is his full 52kg, but because Jay is on a slope, his will only be 47.565kg (74*sin40), Giving us 99.565kg of tension in the rope.

b) Because there is no friction, Paul will still fall at a rate of 9.81m/s^2, even though his effective mass is only 4.435kg. So if he falls the 20m, he will hit the ground at 19.809m/s. Jay is a very different case, because when Paul hits and unties (assuming instantaneous untying of a figure 8 that has just taken a fatty fall :p) then Jay will still be 5m from the top. At that moment, he will have the same velocity as Paul, 19.809m/s. Because he is going uphill, the force of gravity (Fg) will slow him down before he goes over the edge, with a force of 47.565kg. Using the equation F=ma (Force=Mass*Accelaration) we solve for a, giving us F/m=a, or 47.565/74=.643m/s^2. So Jay will have an initial velocity of 19.809m/s, and slow down with an accelaration of -.643m/s^2, leaving him going 19.646m/s at the point of the mountain. Now, when he takes off, he will be traveling upward at an angle of 40 degrees. With a little trig, we find his upward velocity to be 12.628m/s, and his horizontal to be 15.050m/s. Gravity will slow him down at a rate of 9.81m/s^2, which using the equation Vf^2= Vi^2 + 2ax, solved for x, being Vf^2-Vi^2/2a= x, he will travel a full 8.12m upward before he stops midair. This will put him a total of 33.12m above the ground, so when he hits, the vertical component of his velocity will be 25.491m/s. Because of his horizontal velocity, and since he spent a full 3.877 seconds in the air, he will be 58.5 meters away from Paul when he hits the ground, and his resultant velocity will be 29.602m/s, striking at an angle of 59.4 degrees. So Paul will be going 19.809m/s (44.3mi/h), and Jay will be going 29.602m/s (66.2 mi/h)

I hope that made sense and is correct. Either way, their both gonna be pretty messed up, if not dead, after this "predicament"

i'll elaborate: jay's mass is always accelerating towards the ground at 9.8 m/s^2, the vector component of this is always point down the incline at 466 N. paul's mass is accelerating due to gravity in the downward direction with a force of 510 N. Thus the overall tension is 976 N, the NET force on the pulley system is the difference of 44 N taking paul's ship downwards, you can use this to find the system's acceleration in that direction, hence the time to fall and thus his final velocity after 20 m to the ground.


CamCardon


Jul 20, 2010, 9:04 PM
Post #42 of 111 (3916 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2008
Posts: 11

Re: [jrathfon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

And what would that be? If there is no friction, then masses dont matter, they will both accelarate at 9.81m/s^2...


jrathfon


Jul 20, 2010, 9:06 PM
Post #43 of 111 (3914 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [CamCardon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

CamCardon wrote:
And what would that be? If there is no friction, then masses dont matter, they will both accelarate at 9.81m/s^2...

um, jay has an opposing force.... so yes mass does matter. however as jay falls once the rope is cut, you are correct, his mass does not matter due to the frictionless surface.

for bonus points we should consider that a person has a drag coefficient of Cd ~ 1.3

GO!!


CamCardon


Jul 20, 2010, 9:12 PM
Post #44 of 111 (3907 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2008
Posts: 11

Re: [jrathfon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jrathfon wrote:
CamCardon wrote:
And what would that be? If there is no friction, then masses dont matter, they will both accelarate at 9.81m/s^2...

um, jay has an opposing force.... so yes mass does matter. however as jay falls once the rope is cut, you are correct, his mass does not matter due to the frictionless surface.

for bonus points we should consider that a person has a drag coefficient of Cd ~ 1.3

GO!!

I realize he has an opposing force, but since Pauls is larger, and there is no friction, they will both be taken Pauls direction with the accelaration of gravity. And ive done enough math today to deal with adding in more crap into this problem... :p


desertwanderer81


Jul 20, 2010, 9:21 PM
Post #45 of 111 (3896 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 5, 2007
Posts: 2272

Re: [jrathfon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jrathfon wrote:
In reply to:
I do not believe you are correct on the first part.

First off, in a static situation, tension is only calculated with the force on one object. IE, if you have two objects hanging dead off of a frictionless pulley, the total tension in your system will only be that of the weight of one of the objects, not both of the objects combined.

What I did (and there are probably errors in this, so bear with me:

Force on Jay from Gravity = 52*9.81=510.1
Force on Paul from Gravity = 74*9.81=725.94
Force directed downhill from Gravity on Paul = 725.94*Cos(50)=466.1N.

The net force on our system is 510.1-466.1=44N


Calculate the net acceleration:

F(net) = m(net) * a
44N = (52+74)*a
a = 0.349 m/s^2


Calculate the tension on the rope:

F(due to acceleration) = m(paul) * a

F(due to acceleration) = 74*.349 = 25.8N

466.1 + 25.8 = 491.9N

The tension on the rope is 491.9N


Calculate the speed at which Jay decks:


x= 1/2*a*t^2
25=.5*0.349^2
t = 11.97 seconds

V = a * t = 0.349 * 11.97 = 4.18 m/s

I could have made an error in there somewhere. If I did, please let me know!

go check out the simple force diagram on any climbing pulley and report back.

thanks.

you got the net force paul is falling with correct however. thus you can get paul's acceleration.


You mean like this?

Nice little cocky "report back" though :p

Even if you're wrong :p


(This post was edited by desertwanderer81 on Jul 20, 2010, 9:33 PM)


desertwanderer81


Jul 20, 2010, 9:38 PM
Post #46 of 111 (3882 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 5, 2007
Posts: 2272

Re: [CamCardon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

CamCardon wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
CamCardon wrote:
And what would that be? If there is no friction, then masses dont matter, they will both accelarate at 9.81m/s^2...

um, jay has an opposing force.... so yes mass does matter. however as jay falls once the rope is cut, you are correct, his mass does not matter due to the frictionless surface.

for bonus points we should consider that a person has a drag coefficient of Cd ~ 1.3

GO!!

I realize he has an opposing force, but since Pauls is larger, and there is no friction, they will both be taken Pauls direction with the accelaration of gravity. And ive done enough math today to deal with adding in more crap into this problem... :p

Except that you have to look at the vector components of Paul's weight. The force along the slope is less than Jay's weight.


desertwanderer81


Jul 20, 2010, 9:41 PM
Post #47 of 111 (3879 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 5, 2007
Posts: 2272

Re: [jrathfon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jrathfon wrote:
CamCardon wrote:
And what would that be? If there is no friction, then masses dont matter, they will both accelarate at 9.81m/s^2...

um, jay has an opposing force.... so yes mass does matter. however as jay falls once the rope is cut, you are correct, his mass does not matter due to the frictionless surface.

for bonus points we should consider that a person has a drag coefficient of Cd ~ 1.3

GO!!

1.3 is a bit high ;) But obviously 1.3 would make it so they would not be going anywhere.

And that's not even taking into account the rope over the edge ;)


CamCardon


Jul 20, 2010, 9:42 PM
Post #48 of 111 (3878 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2008
Posts: 11

Re: [desertwanderer81] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

desertwanderer81 wrote:
CamCardon wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
CamCardon wrote:
And what would that be? If there is no friction, then masses dont matter, they will both accelarate at 9.81m/s^2...

um, jay has an opposing force.... so yes mass does matter. however as jay falls once the rope is cut, you are correct, his mass does not matter due to the frictionless surface.

for bonus points we should consider that a person has a drag coefficient of Cd ~ 1.3

GO!!

I realize he has an opposing force, but since Pauls is larger, and there is no friction, they will both be taken Pauls direction with the accelaration of gravity. And ive done enough math today to deal with adding in more crap into this problem... :p

Except that you have to look at the vector components of Paul's weight. The force along the slope is less than Jay's weight.

There are no components of Paul's weight, he is falling straight down. And the opposing component of Jay's weight is still less than Paul's total weight.


kriso9tails


Jul 20, 2010, 9:44 PM
Post #49 of 111 (3878 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [donald949] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

donald949 wrote:
shimanilami wrote:
ANSWER: Jay should cut the rope.
Exactly. Although he could save time by just letting go, as I noticed his belay technique is pretty bad.
And Paul has it coming, as clearly it is his plan to drop Jay later by untieing.
Paul you are a bastard, dropping Jay after he held you. I will never climb with you. Mad

If you look closely, the rope seems to be affixed to something inside of Jay's pants. The foot belay is sounding pretty reasonable right about now.


desertwanderer81


Jul 20, 2010, 9:49 PM
Post #50 of 111 (3872 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 5, 2007
Posts: 2272

Re: [CamCardon] Hey Majid!!! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

CamCardon wrote:
desertwanderer81 wrote:
CamCardon wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
CamCardon wrote:
And what would that be? If there is no friction, then masses dont matter, they will both accelarate at 9.81m/s^2...

um, jay has an opposing force.... so yes mass does matter. however as jay falls once the rope is cut, you are correct, his mass does not matter due to the frictionless surface.

for bonus points we should consider that a person has a drag coefficient of Cd ~ 1.3

GO!!

I realize he has an opposing force, but since Pauls is larger, and there is no friction, they will both be taken Pauls direction with the accelaration of gravity. And ive done enough math today to deal with adding in more crap into this problem... :p

Except that you have to look at the vector components of Paul's weight. The force along the slope is less than Jay's weight.

There are no components of Paul's weight, he is falling straight down. And the opposing component of Jay's weight is still less than Paul's total weight.

ooops! I flipped their names around. Sorry.

In reply to:
Except that you have to look at the vector components of Jay's weight. The force along the slope is less than Paul's weight.

I'm not sure I'm gathering at what you were getting at then.....

You're stating "masses don't matter since there is no friction"

The mass of each person does matter :p


(This post was edited by desertwanderer81 on Jul 20, 2010, 9:51 PM)

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook