|
evanwish
Oct 29, 2008, 3:50 AM
Post #26 of 76
(3903 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040
|
wishiwasamonkey wrote: I just finished making my own 11" cam and am fine tuning the spring action. I was wondering if anyone has experimented with different spring configurations (anything other than torsional) for bigger cams? such as extension springs or compression springs like in the c3s care to post a picture? thats pretty awesome!
(This post was edited by evanwish on Oct 29, 2008, 3:54 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
wishiwasamonkey
Oct 29, 2008, 3:28 PM
Post #27 of 76
(3862 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2006
Posts: 54
|
adatesman wrote: Why do anything but a torsion spring? The reason for compression springs in C3's and flat torsion springs in Aliens is dealing with the lack of space due to having a narrow head. In an 11" cam you've got all the space you could possibly want, so why change the type of spring? My thought was that with room available new options may be available. Also, since as cams get larger you need stiffer torsional springs to maintain the same outward force generated without a load applied and with the longer stem greater outward force is required to prevent walking, the torsional springs required gain significant weight and size. I thought a different spring configuration might shave some weight off a heavy cam by either having lighter springs or allowing a narrower head and, as mentioned by apollodorus, the axle is a significant portion of a cams weight. Finally, I have a variety of springs at my disposal and it would be fun to play with something new. Photos might be a few days. The thing is currently laying in pieces on my living room floor awaiting a few modifications. Its snowing here so my motivation is pretty low. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
|
evanwish
Oct 29, 2008, 11:27 PM
Post #28 of 76
(3808 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040
|
awesome! lookin forward to it [that is, because i'm in the midst of making my own] ;)
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Oct 30, 2008, 12:08 AM
Post #29 of 76
(3784 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Oct 30, 2008, 12:22 AM
Post #30 of 76
(3766 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2437
|
Hey I know, let's re-invent the wheel. While we're at it, let's make sure to get on rc.noob and ask all the other noobs for their valuable input to a process I shouldn't be undertaking to begin with. Then, after the Instron tests convince me how smart I am, let's go out to the rocks and try it. Just go climbing and leave this stuff to the folks who know what in the hell they are doing.
(This post was edited by socalclimber on Oct 30, 2008, 12:28 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
flipnfall
Oct 30, 2008, 12:39 AM
Post #31 of 76
(3754 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 18, 2004
Posts: 717
|
socalclimber wrote: Hey I know, let's re-invent the wheel. While we're at it, let's make sure to get on rc.noob and ask all the other noobs for their valuable input to a process I shouldn't be undertaking to begin with. Then, after the Instron tests convince me how smart I am, let's go out to the rocks and try it. Just go climbing and leave this stuff to the folks who know what in the hell they are doing. I know what I'm doing! Hey, I'm going to make a cam. GT
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Oct 30, 2008, 1:04 AM
Post #32 of 76
(3738 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Oct 30, 2008, 1:38 AM
Post #33 of 76
(3707 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2437
|
"Sigh" Here's a tissue, dry your eyes and wipe your nose. I have a sneaking suspicion I've been around engineering longer than you've likely been able to spell the word. Tinker all you want, in fact I think Hasbro created the perfect product, there called Tinker Toys", but coming to an internet forum like rc.noob and asking for the ever valuable advice of others equaly as cluesless as you is a fools paradise. Comments like "There's nothing all that complex about cams" is clearly an indication you have yet to work on a project where either lives are at stake, or hundreds of millions of dollars are going down the toilet if you fuck up. This one is a gem: "and all the math is already done and readily available online (Vaino Kodas, Susan Ruff, John Middendorf)" Brilliant, gee, all the hard work has already been done for me, why on earth would I want to check that data and do some analysis for myself. When I worked at JPL, we had a saying when we had to hire the summer college students. It would never fail, we'd have a problem to solve, we'd have the meeting, and almost always we'd get one of these tards say "no problems, just do x,y, and z.". We always responded the same: It's trivial! Have a good time children. God there must be thousands of sites in the mech. engieering world where he could get real advice from, instead, he comes here. Speaks volumes.
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Oct 30, 2008, 1:47 AM
Post #34 of 76
(3690 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
styndall
Oct 30, 2008, 1:50 AM
Post #35 of 76
(3683 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 29, 2002
Posts: 2741
|
socalclimber wrote: "Sigh" Here's a tissue, dry your eyes and wipe your nose. I have a sneaking suspicion I've been around engineering longer than you've likely been able to spell the word. Tinker all you want, in fact I think Hasbro created the perfect product, there called Tinker Toys", but coming to an internet forum like rc.noob and asking for the ever valuable advice of others equaly as cluesless as you is a fools paradise. Comments like "There's nothing all that complex about cams" is clearly an indication you have yet to work on a project where either lives are at stake, or hundreds of millions of dollars are going down the toilet if you fuck up. This one is a gem: "and all the math is already done and readily available online (Vaino Kodas, Susan Ruff, John Middendorf)" Brilliant, gee, all the hard work has already been done for me, why on earth would I want to check that data and do some analysis for myself. When I worked at JPL, we had a saying when we had to hire the summer college students. It would never fail, we'd have a problem to solve, we'd have the meeting, and almost always we'd get one of these tards say "no problems, just do x,y, and z.". We always responded the same: It's trivial! Have a good time children. God there must be thousands of sites in the mech. engieering world where he could get real advice from, instead, he comes here. Speaks volumes. Don't be such a douche. He replied to a really old post in which Apollodorus, a guy who made the best big cams around, discussed his methods for making the Valley Giants. This is the right place for this question, though maybe not the right time. I haven't seen Apollodorus post in quite a while.
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Oct 30, 2008, 1:50 AM
Post #36 of 76
(3683 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
socalclimber wrote: "Sigh" Here's a tissue, dry your eyes and wipe your nose. I have a sneaking suspicion I've been around engineering longer than you've likely been able to spell the word. Tinker all you want, in fact I think Hasbro created the perfect product, there called Tinker Toys", but coming to an internet forum like rc.noob and asking for the ever valuable advice of others equaly as cluesless as you is a fools paradise. Comments like "There's nothing all that complex about cams" is clearly an indication you have yet to work on a project where either lives are at stake, or hundreds of millions of dollars are going down the toilet if you fuck up. This one is a gem: "and all the math is already done and readily available online (Vaino Kodas, Susan Ruff, John Middendorf)" Brilliant, gee, all the hard work has already been done for me, why on earth would I want to check that data and do some analysis for myself. When I worked at JPL, we had a saying when we had to hire the summer college students. It would never fail, we'd have a problem to solve, we'd have the meeting, and almost always we'd get one of these tards say "no problems, just do x,y, and z.". We always responded the same: It's trivial! Have a good time children. God there must be thousands of sites in the mech. engieering world where he could get real advice from, instead, he comes here. Speaks volumes. Spoken like a typical engineer. Translation: "No one could be as smart as we are."
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Oct 30, 2008, 1:58 AM
Post #37 of 76
(3672 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2437
|
Be rest assured I won't, because you clearly wouldn't listen or learn anything anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Oct 30, 2008, 2:13 AM
Post #38 of 76
(3659 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
evanwish
Oct 30, 2008, 2:18 AM
Post #39 of 76
(3654 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040
|
adatesman wrote: Wishiwasamonkey and Evanwish- how are you making your cams? Lobes- hand tools, manual milling machine or CNC? Stems- single stem / dual stem? Wire or solid like forged friends? If wire stems- swaged, brazed or something else? Lobe profiles- freehand, spreadsheet, CAD, other? I've drawn up all the pieces to scale and they're ready for my buddy to cut (He works in a machining shop). I'm not sure how they do cut it the shop, so he's the smarts on that portion of the project. Its a Dual U stem (wire of course) and the lobes were coppied from a spreadsheet for the record: i highly doubt we'd acctually be using this on the rock.. I came up with an idea that would give the cam a 3:1 expansion range and think it's worth a try to see if its worth anything :]
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Oct 30, 2008, 2:24 AM
Post #40 of 76
(3651 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2437
|
Yawn.... ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...........................
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Oct 30, 2008, 2:28 AM
Post #41 of 76
(3646 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
evanwish
Oct 30, 2008, 2:43 AM
Post #42 of 76
(3633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040
|
yeah that's got to be a great sense of accomplishment. I would definately get it pull tested before i trusted it though.
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Oct 30, 2008, 11:24 AM
Post #43 of 76
(3577 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
socalclimber wrote: Comments like "There's nothing all that complex about cams" is clearly an indication you have yet to work on a project where either lives are at stake, or hundreds of millions of dollars are going down the toilet if you fuck up. Ray Jardine said it himself. Cams just aren't that complicated. Nobody is talking about building skyscrapers.
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Oct 30, 2008, 1:08 PM
Post #44 of 76
(3559 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
rightarmbad
Oct 30, 2008, 1:52 PM
Post #45 of 76
(3540 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 218
|
Looking at the bigger one, it is obvious why the big lobes had to be on the outside now.
|
|
|
|
|
wishiwasamonkey
Oct 31, 2008, 12:51 PM
Post #46 of 76
(3452 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2006
Posts: 54
|
Here is the cam: [inline PA3103722.gif] I have a old bridgeport mill retrofitted with digital readouts, no power feed, no CNC. So I generated my toolpath in excel and crank the lobes out manually to within .003". If I do this again I will opt for .005" to save some time. I aim to retrofit my mill for CNC eventually so I will probably wait until then to make another. The cam cost about 20 dollars in materials and 2 afternoons in the shop. I have leftover aluminum so you could probably do it for less. Head width is 4". I will give a review once i get it out on some rock. As a side note: I don't get why the "no one could be as smart or capable as me" attitude is so common among engineers. It drives me a little nuts sometimes, and I am one.
|
Attachments:
|
PA3103722.JPG
(80.6 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Oct 31, 2008, 1:03 PM
Post #47 of 76
(3447 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
wishiwasamonkey wrote: Here is the cam: I have a old bridgeport mill retrofitted with digital readouts, no power feed, no CNC. So I generated my toolpath in excel and crank the lobes out manually to within .003". If I do this again I will opt for .005" to save some time. I aim to retrofit my mill for CNC eventually so I will probably wait until then to make another. The cam cost about 20 dollars in materials and 2 afternoons in the shop. I have leftover aluminum so you could probably do it for less. Head width is 4". I will give a review once i get it out on some rock. As a side note: I don't get why the "no one could be as smart or capable as me" attitude is so common among engineers. It drives me a little nuts sometimes, and I am one.
|
|
|
|
|
sgreer
Oct 31, 2008, 3:15 PM
Post #48 of 76
(3340 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2008
Posts: 112
|
Is it really woth the time when you can go down to the store and buy them? All the effort in aquireing the materials and the tools to do the job correctly may not be worth the headache. Have you ever used silver solider before? Do you know what kind of heat treating some components recieve? Many lobes and components are anodized to resist corrosion. Are you going to do this ro something similar? Do you plan on testing some to failure? I work in the product development field as a Mechanical Engineer. If you need direction or tips hit me up. Athough a huge undertaking, it sounds like a blast!
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Oct 31, 2008, 3:48 PM
Post #49 of 76
(3322 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
sgreer wrote: Is it really woth the time when you can go down to the store and buy them? All the effort in aquireing the materials and the tools to do the job correctly may not be worth the headache. Headache? On complex projects that's most of the fun!
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Oct 31, 2008, 3:57 PM
Post #50 of 76
(3318 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
sgreer wrote: Is it really woth the time when you can go down to the store and buy them? All the effort in aquireing the materials and the tools to do the job correctly may not be worth the headache. Haven't you ever done something yourself when you could have paid someone else to build/repair/do it? My wife and I have done a ton or work on our house: repointed and lined a chimney (former sweep); refinished floors; installed counter tops, a fence and railing; etc. Friends of mine build furniture, knit, raise chickens, do minor car repair, sew their own chalk bags, etc. There's something satisfying in both the work and final product of your labor. That said, not all of us have the equipment, knowledge, time, and desire to build our own cams. For those that do, their efforts are rarely as clean as commercially available cams. One poster said it cost him around $20 in material and a couple afternoons. That sounds like a pretty minor investment to me. Edit: I reread your post. Disregard my knee-jerk reply to your first paragraph. You obviously know the effort that goes into the process, which is part of the reward for some.
(This post was edited by markc on Oct 31, 2008, 4:00 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|