Forums: Climbing Information: General:
LYING ABOUT ACCOMPLISHMENTS?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All


wallwombat


May 24, 2010, 12:05 PM
Post #51 of 56 (1915 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2003
Posts: 727

     Re: [lotze] NOT SOLO, proven lack of integrity [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
 

lotze wrote:
As revealed with Chad's own interview statements, cited and quoted in links,
(1) Chad's Everest attempt is no longer unsupported, nor, without the aid of Sherpa.
(2) No longer solo.

A major change from months of dozens of press releases world wide with his professed commitments to do a Solo, Unsupported, Without Sherpa Assistance, speed climb.

His climb is now
NOT SOLO
SUPPORTED
SHERPA AIDED with 2 hired Sherpa.

So, he is hardly the first person who has set off to the Himalayas, with a particular goal in mind and, for one reason or another, has failed to achieve that goal.

He seems to have admitted that. Get over it.

You are giving everyone here a headache with your incessant whining.

Seriously, mate, you are coming across as a seriously unhinged, obsessive little prat.


Partner climboard


May 24, 2010, 2:07 PM
Post #52 of 56 (1897 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2001
Posts: 503

     Re: [ilikepargo] Lying About Accomplishments [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
 

I believe this is more appropriate-




(This post was edited by climboard on May 24, 2010, 2:10 PM)


bill413


May 24, 2010, 5:41 PM
Post #53 of 56 (1850 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

     Re: [climboard] Lying About Accomplishments [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
 

climboard wrote:
I believe this is more appropriate-

[image]http://annarborgrocerydelivery.com/shop/images/Fruit-Loops.bmp[/image]

See - there is a Kelloggcereal controversy


(This post was edited by bill413 on May 24, 2010, 5:44 PM)


caughtinside


May 24, 2010, 7:44 PM
Post #54 of 56 (1815 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

     Re: [lotze] NOT SOLO, proven lack of integrity [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
 

lotze wrote:
Proven Chad Kellogg's Everest attempt, happening today, is NOT SOLO, contrary to what he has been stating for months.

http://mountaineeringfrauds.wordpress.com/...tegrityless-conduct/


In a May 17 interview with Outside Magazine, Chad abruptly changed his plan 5 days before his attempt, and will be doing 1/2 of the climb with a climbing partner.

http://outside-blog.away.com/...st-chad-kellogg.html
Stephanie: “Are you afraid of anything?”
Chad: “As a tentative solution I’ll have a buddy descend with me so I don’t do anything stupid.”

As revealed with Chad's own interview statements, cited and quoted in links,
(1) Chad's Everest attempt is no longer unsupported, nor, without the aid of Sherpa.
(2) No longer solo.

A major change from months of dozens of press releases world wide with his professed commitments to do a Solo, Unsupported, Without Sherpa Assistance, speed climb.

His climb is now
NOT SOLO
SUPPORTED
SHERPA AIDED with 2 hired Sherpa.

Hey that's cute. While your pal Chad is in Nepal doing something cool, you're sitting at home on the internet reading about it and shitting your pants in rage. Score one for Chad.


chadnsc


May 24, 2010, 7:52 PM
Post #55 of 56 (1809 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

     Re: [caughtinside] NOT SOLO, proven lack of integrity [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
 

caughtinside wrote:
Score one for Chad.

Yippie I scored one! Wink


edge


May 24, 2010, 8:02 PM
Post #56 of 56 (1800 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120

     Re: [caughtinside] NOT SOLO, proven lack of integrity [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
 

To be fair:

Lotze and his previous incarnations have been banned. It is plain that they were accounts set up to bash someone else personally...

Should this person choose to set up yet another account to bash someone, then it is fair to say that they will also be banned, as soon as it is realized/brought to the mods attention.

Sure, it may be more fun to poke at him with a sharp stick, but we seem to be dealing with someone with serious emotional issues. I would hope that we could afford better responses, but I will not count on it.

Dan/lotze/you know your other names: KNOCK IT OFF.

I hate moderating free speech, but you, sir, deserve every restriction so far.

Others will be more swift.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook