|
petsfed
May 3, 2011, 9:18 PM
Post #51 of 107
(2355 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
Honestly, the really hard part is to wrap the worm around so they can't see the hook.
|
|
|
|
|
clee03m
May 3, 2011, 11:11 PM
Post #52 of 107
(2339 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 29, 2004
Posts: 785
|
LostinMaine wrote: This is my first spring as a parent. I have somewhat decided that the first year or two are dedicated to our little girl and I will take up activities that we can easily do together. Having said that, my wife and I set up a TR rope solo last weekend, each taking turns climbing while the other walked the baby and did the parenting thing. It worked out really well. If you don't know how to rope solo safely, this might be a fantastic opportunity and incentive to learn. I had always meant to and never really learned or got gear for it. This may be a fun opportunity to learn. Thanks for the suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
May 4, 2011, 12:23 AM
Post #53 of 107
(2328 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
What's funny here is that everyone seems to think babies have to loud and yelling. I've seen babies at the crags in several countries. I've never seen one that inconvenienced me in any way. Some crags are dangerous, some are not. Taking a baby to the a safe climbing area is no more dangerous than taking the same baby hiking, and problem safer than taking the same baby to the beach. Go climb in Germany or France, and chance are you see a baby at the cliff most weekends. Of course, European families actually spend time together. I also notice that European climbers tend to climb harder then American climbers, could be all that exposure at an early age. Climbing is as safe or dangerous as you make it.
|
|
|
|
|
cacalderon
May 4, 2011, 1:31 AM
Post #54 of 107
(2323 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 150
|
definitely NOT a good idea as many things could go wrong ( too easy for belayer to lose concentration plus dropped gear, falling rock/debris, tripping and falling, etc) find someone (other couples with kids) and take turns babysitting. cheers
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
May 4, 2011, 1:51 AM
Post #55 of 107
(2317 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
I plan on using my baby as a crash pad. Just think of all that squishy padding, you'll not roll an ankle on that chubby sucker!
|
|
|
|
|
boymeetsrock
May 4, 2011, 12:53 PM
Post #56 of 107
(2282 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709
|
Where is that picture of the guy using his six year old as a crash pad at the gunks, when you need it.?.
|
|
|
|
|
smallclimber
May 4, 2011, 5:07 PM
Post #58 of 107
(2246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 11, 2003
Posts: 301
|
I agree, babies don't always make a lot of noise, and even if they are crying it will be less volume than annoying climbers spraying or giving unsolicited beta, which is far more distracting than a background whine. A large group of children could be noisy, but a baby will watch whats going on, sleep a bit and when they cry parents can stop and give him some attention. To all the people who said "leave the baby at home" - whats the point in having a baby if you leave him at home? You're a family now, the idea is you enjoy doing things, including climbing outside, together.
|
|
|
|
|
Diphthong
May 4, 2011, 5:44 PM
Post #59 of 107
(2235 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 5, 2011
Posts: 2639
|
guangzhou wrote: What's funny here is that everyone seems to think babies have to loud and yelling. I've seen babies at the crags in several countries. I've never seen one that inconvenienced me in any way. Some crags are dangerous, some are not. Taking a baby to the a safe climbing area is no more dangerous than taking the same baby hiking, and problem safer than taking the same baby to the beach. Go climb in Germany or France, and chance are you see a baby at the cliff most weekends. Of course, European families actually spend time together. I also notice that European climbers tend to climb harder then American climbers, could be all that exposure at an early age. Do you ever make a post that doesn't unnecessarily reference your foreign travel?
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
May 4, 2011, 5:54 PM
Post #60 of 107
(2230 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
smallclimber wrote: To all the people who said "leave the baby at home" - whats the point in having a baby if you leave him at home? You're a family now, the idea is you enjoy doing things, including climbing outside, together. ...as long as you're not negatively affecting the enjoyment of said outdoors of others. For those who do not particularly like babies or small children, just the act of bringing them to a crag is doing just that - affecting the experience and enjoyment of others. It's not necessarily noise, either. Just the presence of all the paraphernalia and the creation of a baby base camp is a major annoyance. Hence the suggestions to either leave the baby at home or go someplace wildly secluded or put aside climbing for 10 years or so. It's your pet kid - I don't have to like it or anything about it one iota and my opinion that it doesn't belong at a crag is just as valid as your misguided belief that it does.
|
|
|
|
|
ClimbSoHigh
May 4, 2011, 6:36 PM
Post #61 of 107
(2217 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2008
Posts: 208
|
In reply to: To all the people who said "leave the baby at home" - whats the point in having a baby if you leave him at home? You're a family now, the idea is you enjoy doing things, including climbing outside, together. To me it has nothing to do with the noise, but more about the safety of the baby. I am more distracted by noobs trying to chat me up and unleashed dogs trying to eat my sandwich.
|
|
|
|
|
smallclimber
May 4, 2011, 6:39 PM
Post #62 of 107
(2212 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 11, 2003
Posts: 301
|
Actually the unleashed dog trying to eat the baby is more of a concern to me than most other issues people have raised. Shame on you if you allow a nOOb chatting you up to distract you though....
|
|
|
|
|
markc
May 4, 2011, 8:06 PM
Post #63 of 107
(2194 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
marc801 wrote: smallclimber wrote: To all the people who said "leave the baby at home" - whats the point in having a baby if you leave him at home? You're a family now, the idea is you enjoy doing things, including climbing outside, together. ...as long as you're not negatively affecting the enjoyment of said outdoors of others. For those who do not particularly like babies or small children, just the act of bringing them to a crag is doing just that - affecting the experience and enjoyment of others. It's not necessarily noise, either. Just the presence of all the paraphernalia and the creation of a baby base camp is a major annoyance. Hence the suggestions to either leave the baby at home or go someplace wildly secluded or put aside climbing for 10 years or so. It's your pet kid - I don't have to like it or anything about it one iota and my opinion that it doesn't belong at a crag is just as valid as your misguided belief that it does. If you're serious, I think you're wound a bit tight. Even seeing a well-behaved kid negatively impacts you? A blanket about the size of a crash pad with books, toys, and snacks on it is a major annoyance, even if it's out of the way and contained? Perhaps it's not families with kids who should find somewhere wildly secluded. I still don't grasp why you're more entitled to be in an area for public use. I don't always like the behavior of others at the crag. That applies to those who are primarily interested in spraying, shouting beta, or being generally disruptive; people who strew stuff all over the crag, including trails; and large groups that rope more than they can climb at once and try to exclude others. I appreciate that these folks have equal right to be there, and I deal with it. I can't say a small family out for the day has ever been an issue for me. When I'm out with the family, it's my goal to not make an issue for anyone else.
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
May 4, 2011, 8:39 PM
Post #64 of 107
(2179 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
markc wrote: marc801 wrote: smallclimber wrote: To all the people who said "leave the baby at home" - whats the point in having a baby if you leave him at home? You're a family now, the idea is you enjoy doing things, including climbing outside, together. ...as long as you're not negatively affecting the enjoyment of said outdoors of others. For those who do not particularly like babies or small children, just the act of bringing them to a crag is doing just that - affecting the experience and enjoyment of others. It's not necessarily noise, either. Just the presence of all the paraphernalia and the creation of a baby base camp is a major annoyance. Hence the suggestions to either leave the baby at home or go someplace wildly secluded or put aside climbing for 10 years or so. It's your pet kid - I don't have to like it or anything about it one iota and my opinion that it doesn't belong at a crag is just as valid as your misguided belief that it does. If you're serious, I think you're wound a bit tight. Even seeing a well-behaved kid negatively impacts you? A blanket about the size of a crash pad with books, toys, and snacks on it is a major annoyance, even if it's out of the way and contained? Perhaps it's not families with kids who should find somewhere wildly secluded. I still don't grasp why you're more entitled to be in an area for public use. I don't always like the behavior of others at the crag. That applies to those who are primarily interested in spraying, shouting beta, or being generally disruptive; people who strew stuff all over the crag, including trails; and large groups that rope more than they can climb at once and try to exclude others. I appreciate that these folks have equal right to be there, and I deal with it. I can't say a small family out for the day has ever been an issue for me. When I'm out with the family, it's my goal to not make an issue for anyone else. Your last statement is fine, but what you fail to grasp is that not everyone likes or easily tolerates babies/children or their associated crap. I'm not any more entitled than you to use public lands, but you need to realize that not everyone feels the same about kids and the family scene, and that your mere presence with said scene can be just as annoying as any of the other objectionable behaviors you enumerated. Again, we're supposedly just talking about bringing babies to the crag in this thread. Bringing in the other annoyances is just obfuscating noise. Face it. You procreated. Humans have done that billions of times over thousands of years. Big deal. It's nothing special. Neither is your kid to anyone else. Get over it.
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
May 4, 2011, 8:56 PM
Post #65 of 107
(2168 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
marc801 wrote: markc wrote: marc801 wrote: smallclimber wrote: To all the people who said "leave the baby at home" - whats the point in having a baby if you leave him at home? You're a family now, the idea is you enjoy doing things, including climbing outside, together. ...as long as you're not negatively affecting the enjoyment of said outdoors of others. For those who do not particularly like babies or small children, just the act of bringing them to a crag is doing just that - affecting the experience and enjoyment of others. It's not necessarily noise, either. Just the presence of all the paraphernalia and the creation of a baby base camp is a major annoyance. Hence the suggestions to either leave the baby at home or go someplace wildly secluded or put aside climbing for 10 years or so. It's your pet kid - I don't have to like it or anything about it one iota and my opinion that it doesn't belong at a crag is just as valid as your misguided belief that it does. If you're serious, I think you're wound a bit tight. Even seeing a well-behaved kid negatively impacts you? A blanket about the size of a crash pad with books, toys, and snacks on it is a major annoyance, even if it's out of the way and contained? Perhaps it's not families with kids who should find somewhere wildly secluded. I still don't grasp why you're more entitled to be in an area for public use. I don't always like the behavior of others at the crag. That applies to those who are primarily interested in spraying, shouting beta, or being generally disruptive; people who strew stuff all over the crag, including trails; and large groups that rope more than they can climb at once and try to exclude others. I appreciate that these folks have equal right to be there, and I deal with it. I can't say a small family out for the day has ever been an issue for me. When I'm out with the family, it's my goal to not make an issue for anyone else. Your last statement is fine, but what you fail to grasp is that not everyone likes or easily tolerates babies/children or their associated crap. I'm not any more entitled than you to use public lands, but you need to realize that not everyone feels the same about kids and the family scene, and that your mere presence with said scene can be just as annoying as any of the other objectionable behaviors you enumerated. Again, we're supposedly just talking about bringing babies to the crag in this thread. Bringing in the other annoyances is just obfuscating noise. Face it. You procreated. Humans have done that billions of times over thousands of years. Big deal. It's nothing special. Neither is your kid to anyone else. Get over it. Well, by that logic, neither are you. It's a two way street, bucko.
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
May 4, 2011, 9:02 PM
Post #67 of 107
(2163 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
carabiner96 wrote: Well, by that logic, neither are you. It's a two way street, bucko. Yep. Never claimed otherwise. But it's something a *lot* of n00b parents forget.
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
May 4, 2011, 9:09 PM
Post #68 of 107
(2159 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
marc801 wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Well, by that logic, neither are you. It's a two way street, bucko. Yep. Never claimed otherwise. But it's something a *lot* of n00b parents forget. You're painting with a pretty broad brush. According to your post, the mere sight of kid related paraphernalia 'annoys' you. Really dude? Sounds like someone has some daddy issues. Lemme guys, don't get this guy started on crag dogs. I'd rather have cute kids running around than some asshole sport wanker cussing at a move he can't stick, or telling the whole crag how 'rad' his home turf is. Don't go all Camden.
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
May 4, 2011, 9:10 PM
Post #69 of 107
(2158 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
Sorry Clee, we've gone and ruined your thread. All we need now is Enigma and USnavy and we'll have a real shit show.
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
May 4, 2011, 9:18 PM
Post #70 of 107
(2156 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
carabiner96 wrote: Sorry Clee, we've gone and ruined your thread. All we need now is Enigma and USnavy and we'll have a real shit show. Ewww- the two of them are into that?!
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
May 4, 2011, 9:23 PM
Post #71 of 107
(2154 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
altelis wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Sorry Clee, we've gone and ruined your thread. All we need now is Enigma and USnavy and we'll have a real shit show. Ewww- the two of them are into that?! Oh man, new thread :"Celebrity off spring of RC.noob: Which users which create the worst offspring? " A USN and a Majid lovechild would rank pretty high.
|
|
|
|
|
redlude97
May 4, 2011, 10:14 PM
Post #72 of 107
(2145 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2008
Posts: 990
|
carabiner96 wrote: marc801 wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Well, by that logic, neither are you. It's a two way street, bucko. Yep. Never claimed otherwise. But it's something a *lot* of n00b parents forget. I'd rather have cute kids running around than some asshole sport wanker cussing at a move he can't stick, or telling the whole crag how 'rad' his home turf is. Don't go all Camden. Just because you find one more acceptable than the other doesn't make either better or worse. Everyone should strive to be considerate of others, and unfortunately that lesson in school wasn't learned by all climbers across the spectrum, from the sport wankers to the group clusterfucks and families.
|
|
|
|
|
TwoPercent
May 4, 2011, 10:33 PM
Post #73 of 107
(2138 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 8, 2010
Posts: 7
|
Good question. It's been great seeing you and the family at the gym. Here's a pic for ya. Bobby
|
Attachments:
|
Baby Tossing.jpg
(74.0 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
erisspirit
May 4, 2011, 11:45 PM
Post #74 of 107
(2123 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770
|
If the parents are being responsible and safe, I actually like it when I see parents outside with their children. These kids are growing up to hopefully respect and love the outdoors. I haven't seen many children at crags yet, but of the ones I have seen so far, the parents have been respectful, and the children well behaved.
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
May 5, 2011, 12:28 AM
Post #75 of 107
(2106 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
Diphthong wrote: guangzhou wrote: What's funny here is that everyone seems to think babies have to loud and yelling. I've seen babies at the crags in several countries. I've never seen one that inconvenienced me in any way. Some crags are dangerous, some are not. Taking a baby to the a safe climbing area is no more dangerous than taking the same baby hiking, and problem safer than taking the same baby to the beach. Go climb in Germany or France, and chance are you see a baby at the cliff most weekends. Of course, European families actually spend time together. I also notice that European climbers tend to climb harder then American climbers, could be all that exposure at an early age. Do you ever make a post that doesn't unnecessarily reference your foreign travel? Considering that I live in foreign countries, I have no choice. American climbers want to make people believe the sport is elitist and not recreation. European think of climbing as a family activity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|